+ All Categories
Home > Documents > DESIGN OF AN ULTRA-WIDE-BAND CMOS LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER

DESIGN OF AN ULTRA-WIDE-BAND CMOS LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER

Date post: 13-Oct-2015
Category:
Upload: irresponsible-shovon
View: 94 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
The objective of this paper is to investigate a ultra-wideband (UWB) low noise amplifier (LNA) by utilizing a simple inductively degenerated LNA with resistive feedback into differential topology, which can improve the bandwidth. The Proposed LNA has been simulated by using HSpice considering BSIM3 model in 0.18 µm RF CMOS technology. Based on those technologies, this proposed UWB LNA obtained a flat gain 8dB bandwidth of 4.7GHz, the constant gain of 8dB, noise figure lower than 2.2dB, and the return loss better than –30dB. HSpice simulation of the proposed LNA shows wider bandwidth of 1.2GHz, low power consumption with gain of 8dB in the frequency band of 4.2 GHz to 8.9GHz. Finally, LNA characterization exhibits ultra-wide bandwidth characteristic and low noise margin. This proposed LNA can be used in UWB and microwave communication system.
Popular Tags:

of 69

Transcript
  • DESIGN OF AN ULTRA-WIDE-BAND CMOS LOW NOISE AMPLIFIER

    A Thesis Submitted to the Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering

    Of AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

    By Md. Sadirul Islam, Student ID: 09.01.05.152 Farzana Ishtiaq, Student ID: 09.01.05.160 Afsana Akhtar, Student ID: 09.01.05.202 Shakib Aman, Student ID: 09.01.05.208

    Tazreen Ahmed, Student ID: 09.01.05.028

    In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Of

    Bachelor of Science in Electrical and Electronic Engineering July 2013

    AHSANULLAH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Dhaka, Bangladesh

  • i

    DECLARATION

    This is to certify that this thesis is the outcome of the original work of the undersigned. No part of this work has been submitted elsewhere, partially and fully, for the award of any other degree or diploma. Materials of work found by other researcher are mentioned by references. Any material reproduced in this thesis has been properly acknowledged.

    (Dr. Pran Kanai Saha) (Md. Sadirul Islam) Professor, Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering BUET, Bangladesh

    (Farzana Ishtiaq)

    Signature of Supervisor

    (Afsana Akhtar)

    (Shakib Aman)

    (Tazreen Ahmed)

    Signature of Authors

  • ii

    ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

    We want to express our sincere gratitude to our supervisor, Professor Dr.

    Pran Kanai Saha, for his continuous guidance and support throughout our

    thesis at Ahsanullah University of Science And Technology. His wisdom and

    kindness had been invaluable and made the whole thesis experience

    enjoyable.

    We specially thank Mr. Md. Sariful Islam (Lecturer, Dept. of EEE, AUST) for his

    valuable suggestion and concise comments on some of the research papers of

    the thesis. He has been very kind enough to extend his help at various phases

    of this research.

    This thesis would not have been possible without the guidance and the help of

    several individuals who in one way or another contributed and extended their

    valuable assistance in the preparation and completion of this thesis.

    Last but not the least, to our family and the one above all of us, the

    omnipresent God, for giving us the strength to complete this thesis within

    given resource and time.

  • iii

    ABSTRACT

    The objective of this paper is to investigate a ultra-wideband (UWB) low noise

    amplifier (LNA) by utilizing a simple inductively degenerated LNA with

    resistive feedback into differential topology, which can improve the

    bandwidth. The Proposed LNA has been simulated by using HSpice

    considering BSIM3 model in 0.18 m RF CMOS technology. Based on those

    technologies, this proposed UWB LNA obtained a flat gain 8dB bandwidth of

    4.7GHz, the constant gain of 8dB, noise figure lower than 2.2dB, and the return

    loss better than 30dB. HSpice simulation of the proposed LNA shows wider

    bandwidth of 1.2GHz, low power consumption with gain of 8dB in the

    frequency band of 4.2 GHz to 8.9GHz. Finally, LNA characterization exhibits

    ultra-wide bandwidth characteristic and low noise margin. This proposed

    LNA can be used in UWB and microwave communication system.

  • iv

    Contents

    Chapter 1 Introduction1

    1.1: Ultra-wideband Technology.....................1

    1.2: CMOS Technology.3

    1.3: VLSI Technology3

    1.4: Basic concept of Ultra-Wide-Band Technology4

    1.5: Ultra-Wide-Band Technologies..6

    1.5.1: Carrier Free Direct Sequence UWB Technology.6

    1.5.2: Multi-Band OFDM (MB-OFDM) UWB Technology........6

    1.6: Advantages of using Ultra-Wide-Band.6

    1.7: Potential Applications of Ultra-Wide-Band.10

    1.7.1: Communications and Sensors10

    1.7.2: Position Location and Tracking.12

    1.7.3: Radar Applications12

    1.8: Ultra-Wide-Band Design Challenges12

    1.9: Objective of this thesis..13

    1.10: Organization of the thesis...13

    Chapter 2 UWB Low Noise Amplifier (LNA)...14

    2.1: Parameters in LNA Design.16

    2.1.1: Noise Figure.16

    2.1.2: Input Impedance Match.18

    2.1.3: Gain.19

    2.1.4: Linearity.20

    2.2: Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) Topologies.22

    2.2.1: Amplifier Distributed (DA).23

    2.2.2: Common Gate (CG)24

    2.2.3: Inductively Degenerated Common Source Topology (IDCS)...26

    2.2.4: Cascode Topology..27

  • v

    2.2.5: Folded Cascode Topology...28

    2.2.6: Cascade Topology29

    2.2.7: Current Reuse Topology..29

    2.2.8: Differential Topology.31

    2.2.9: Novel Topology.32

    2.3: Proposed Topology.32

    Chapter 3 Architecture of UWB LNA and Simulation Results..33

    3.1 Architecture of UWB LNA...36

    3.1.1 Single Ended LNA.37

    3.1.2 Full Differential LNA..41

    3.1.3 Balun Circuit43

    3.2 Final Simulation Results..44

    Chapter 4 Conclusion..52

    4.1 Summary of Contribution...52

    4.2 Future Work52

  • vi

    List of Figures

    Fig 1.1: Ultra wideband Technology ..2

    Fig 1.2: Block Diagram of UWB System.2

    Fig 1.3: Illustration of the Definition of UWB frequency range..4

    Fig 1.4: UWB spectral mask for indoor communication systems..5

    Fig 2.1: (a) Block Diagram of LNA at receiving end14

    (b) Signal processing.15

    Fig 2.2: Combination of power amplifier circuit and LNA circuit..15

    Fig 2.3: Equivalent small signal circuit...17

    Fig 2.4: More hardware in the input matching network..19

    Fig 2.5: Equivalent circuit with inductive source degeneration.19

    Fig 2.6: CP1 and 3rd order intercept point20

    Fig 2.7: Two-tones with the IDM3 product...21

    Fig 2.8: Generalized structure of distributed LNA...23

    Fig 2.9: Conventional CG- LNA and low noise techniques employing feedback ..24

    Fig 2.10: (a) Common source configuration for Narrow band 26

    (b) Inductive degenerated CS for UWB..26

    Fig 2.11: Cascode configuration..27

    Fig 2.12: Folded cascade configuration..28

    Fig 2.13: Conventional current reuse configuration..30

    Fig 2.14: Differential capacitive cross coupled configuration..31

    Fig 2.15: Noise cancelling principle of differential topology.31

    Fig 3.1: Block Diagram of LNA.33

  • vii

    Fig 3.2: Common LNA Architectures: Resistive termination34

    Fig 3.3: Common LNA Architectures: 1/gm termination34

    Fig 3.4: Common LNA Architectures: Shunt-series feedback...35

    Fig 3.5: Common LNA Architectures: Inductive degeneration35

    Fig 3.6: Simplified Block Diagram of proposed LNA..36

    Fig 3.7: LNA topology for UWB single ended LNA...37

    Fig 3.8: LNA topology for UWB LNA Small-signal equivalent circuit of the input of LNA...38

    Fig 3.9: S21of Single Ended LNA...39

    Fig 3.10: S11of Single Ended LNA39

    Fig 3.11: AC output Noise Figure of Single Ended LNA.40

    Fig 3.12: Maximum Power Gain of Single Ended LNA...40

    Fig 3.13: Full-Differential LNA.41

    Fig 3.14: Balun Circuit...43

    Fig 3.15: S21 (dB) of Differential LNA...44

    Fig 3.16: S11 (dB) of Differential LNA...44

    Fig3.17: Comparison between S21 and S11 ...45

    Fig 3.18: AC output Noise figure of Differential LNA.46

    Fig 3.19: Minimum AC output Noise figure of Differential LNA..46

    Fig 3.20: S22 of Differential LNA..47

    Fig 3.21: Comparison between S11 and S22 of Differential LNA...47

    Fig 3.22: S12 of Differential LNA..48

    Fig 3.23: Output Noise of Differential LNA...48

    Fig 3.24: Input Noise (dB) of Differential LNA...49

    Fig 3.25: Comparison between input noise (dB) and output noise (dB)...49

    Fig 3.27: Maximum Power Gain of Differential LNA..50

  • viii

    List of Tables

    Table 1.1: FCC allocations for each UWB category.5

    Table3.1: Comparison of performance between Single ended LNA and Differential LNA........50

    Table3.2: Performance of LNA51

    Table3.3: Comparison with other LNA from the bibliography.51

  • ix

    List of Abbreviations

    BPSK Binary Phase Shift Keying

    CGLNA Common-Gate Low-Noise Amplifier

    CSLNA Common-Source Low-Noise Amplifier

    CCC Capacitive Cross-Couple

    CDMA Code Division Multiple Access

    DS Direct Sequence

    EVDO Enhanced Voice-Data Only

    EIRP Effective Isotropic Radiated Power

    FH Frequency Hopping

    FCC Federal Communications Commission

    IP3 3rd Order Intercept Point

    IMD3 3rd Order Intermodulation

    IDCS Inductively Degenerated Common Source

    IIP3 3rd Order Input Power Level

    LPI Low Probability of Intercept

    LPD Low Probability of Detection

    LOS Line Of Sight

    MBOFDM Multi-Band Offset Frequency Division Modulation

    MMIC Microwave Monolithic Integrated Circuit

    NLOS Non-Line Of Sight

    OFDM Offset Frequency Division Modulation

    OIP3 3rd Order Output Power Level

  • x

    PG Processing Gain

    PDA Personal Digital Assistant

    PSD Power Spectral Density

    SNR Signal To Noise Ratio

    SpO2 Oxygen Saturation Sensor

    SFDR Spurious Free Dynamic Range

    UWB Ultra-wideband

    VSWR Voltage Standing Wave Ratio

    WWAN Wireless Wide Area Network

    WLAN Wireless Local Area Network

    WPAN Wireless Personal Area Network

    WBAN Wireless Body Area Network

  • 1

    Chapter 1

    Introduction

    The late 20th and early 21st century can be referred to as the wireless era, in which we

    witnessed the rapid growth of wireless communication technologies. It is not uncommon

    nowadays for an average home to have several digital cameras, portable music players,

    cellular phones and external hard drives. As the number of device increase, so does the

    number of wires connecting these devices together. It is usually frustrating to see a mess of

    cables around the home or office desk and can also be inconvenient to have to carry these

    cables when travelling.

    One could see how wireless technologies could erase the life of user by removing some or

    all of these wires. The current wireless data technologies can be divided into 3 categories:

    WWAN (Wireless Wide Area Network),

    WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network)

    WPAN (Wireless Personal Area Network).

    WWAN includes direct satellite link, CDMA based EVDO and WIMAX that covers regions of

    several miles wide. WLAN system is Wi-Fi (802.11a/b/g). Wi-Fi has the potential for high

    data rates. WPAN has a coverage range of a few feet. Two notable examples of WPAN are

    infra-red and Bluetooth communication.

    Among all these wireless technologies, Ultra-Wideband (UWB) is the most promising

    technology for next generation WPANs, especially because of its low cost, low power and

    high data rates for applications.

    1.1 Ultra-wideband Technology

    The recent surge in the demand for low power portable wireless electronics that can offer

    extremely high data rates has resulted in much active research in Ultra-wideband (UWB)

    systems. UWB is widely recognized as a promising technology for high data rate, short-

    range applications with precise time resolution and high energy efficiency. Ultra wideband

    (also known as UWB or as digital pulse wireless) is a wireless technology for transmitting

  • 2

    large amounts of digital data over a wide spectrum of frequency bands with very low

    power for a short distance.

    Figure 1.1: Ultra wideband Technology

    All these benefits originate from the wideband current technology, UWB can offer data

    rates up to 480 Mbps and its operational frequency spectrum is between 3.1 and 10.6GHz.

    However, the wideband operation of UWB systems imposes many design challenges that

    have not been explored before in the traditional narrowband ones.

    A basic UWB system has a signal pulse generator which generates a Gaussian pulse to

    transmit the encoded signal. The pulses are amplified and transmitted via antenna to the

    receiver. When receiving antenna receives the transmitted signal, LNA amplify the signal

    before it continues on into the receiver.

    Figure 1.2: Block Diagram of UWB System.[1]

  • 3

    Here LNA is the subsystem and in this thesis our focus is the LNA design. We will discuss

    about LNA in chapter 2 and LNA design in chapter 3.

    1.2 CMOS Technology

    Complementary metaloxidesemiconductor (CMOS) is a technology for constructing

    integrated circuits. In CMOS technology, both N-type and P-type transistors are used to

    realize logic functions.

    CMOS was originally not considered a good technology for analog and RF applications

    [Compared to Silicon-Germanium (SiGe) and Gallium-Arsenide (GaAs)]. However, the rapid

    growth of the digital industry due to the continuous scaling of the CMOS technology has

    motivated designers to create analog and RF CMOS circuits that can be integrated easily

    with digital circuitry. The speed of CMOS is more than adequate for a common wireless

    system which has a maximum operating frequency at 10 GHz. Despite the inferior

    performance of RF CMOS circuits compared to SiGe and GaAs counterparts, the feasibility

    of integrating analog/digital/RF circuits on chip, the potential low cost and low power

    consumption and the dominance of CMOS in digital circuitry has provided reasonable

    motives to adopt CMOS over other technologies.

    1.3 VLSI Technology

    Very-large-scale integration (VLSI) is design/manufacturing of extremely small, complex

    circuitry using modified semiconductor material. It may contain millions of transistors,

    each a few mm in size which is called Integrated circuit (IC).It is the process of creating

    integrated circuits by combining thousands of transistor-based circuits into on a single chip

    and has wide range of applications mostly based on electronic logic devices. As a side effect

    of advances in the world of computers, there has been a dramatic proliferation of tools that

    can be used to design VLSI circuits. CMOS having the ability to allow a high density of logic

    functions on a chip, it became the most used technology to be implemented in VLSI chips.

  • 4

    1.4 Basic concept of Ultra-Wide-Band Technology

    Ultra-Wideband Communications was first employed by Guglielmo Marconi in 1901 to

    transmit Morse code sequences across Atlantic Ocean using spark gap radio transmitters.

    Approximately fifty years after Marconi, UWB technology was applied to impulse radars in

    military applications and this technology was restricted to military from 1960s to 1990s.

    However, ultra-wideband is now ready for commercial applications because of recent

    advancements in microprocessors stemming from the rapid development of semiconductor

    technology.

    Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the United States defined UWB signal as any

    emitting signal that has a fractional bandwidth greater than or equal to 0.20 or has a

    bandwidth greater than or equal to 500MHz. The fractional bandwidth is calculated as 2

    ( fH - fL)/( fH + fL) and can be expressed as:

    Bf= B

    100% =

    100%

    Where B is the absolute frequency bandwidth, fc is the center frequency, fH is the upper -10

    dB corner frequency and fL is the lower -10 dB corner frequency as shown in the figure.

    Figure 1.3: Illustration of the Definition of UWB frequency range.

    The early applications of UWB technology were primarily radar related, driven by the

    promise of fine-range resolution that comes with large bandwidth. But the recent 3.1-

  • 5

    10.6GHz allocation extends the UWB use to a larger application area for which the specific

    frequency ranges are reported in the table 1.4.1 FCC allocations for each UWB category.

    Table 1.1: FCC allocations for each UWB category

    Class/Application Frequency Band for operation

    Communication and measurement systems 3.1 to 10.6 GHz (different out-of-band

    emission Limits for indoor and outdoor

    devices)

    Imaging : ground penetrating radar, wall,

    medical imaging

    960 MHz or 3.1 to 10.6 GHz

    Imaging: through wall 960 MHz or 1.99 to 10.6 GHz

    Imaging: surveillance 1.99 to 10.6 GHz

    UWB operational frequency bands, authorized by the FCC are, below 960 MHz, 3.1-10.6

    GHz and 22-29 GHz. The FCC has mandated that UWB radio transmissions can legally

    operate in the range 3.1 to 10.6 GHz, with the power spectral density (PSD) satisfying a

    specific spectral mask assigned by FCC. Figure illustrates the UWB spectral mask for indoor

    communications. According to the spectral mask the allowed effective isotropic radiated

    power (EIRP) is below 41.3 dBm /MHz .

    Figure 1.4: UWB spectral mask for indoor communication systems.

  • 6

    1.5 Ultra-Wide-Band Technologies

    UWB communications transmit in which it does not interfere with conventional

    narrowband and carrier wave used in the same frequency band.

    Despite the single named used for the ultra wideband (UWB) transmissions, there are two

    very different technologies being developed:

    Carrier free direct sequence ultra wideband technology

    MBOFDM, Multi-Band OFDM ultra wideband technology

    1.5.1 Carrier Free Direct Sequence UWB Technology

    Direct sequence (DS) format for ultra wideband is often referred to as an impulse,

    baseband or zero carrier technology. DS based UWB increases system performance over

    traditional impulse based UWB by using direct sequence spread technology, while

    maintaining a very simple system structure. This form of UWB technology transmits a

    series of low power Gaussian shaped pulses which are coherently received at the receiver.

    Each of the DS UWB pulses has an extremely short duration typically between 10 and 1000

    picoseconds. As a result it is shorter than the duration of a single bit of the data to be

    transmitted.

    1.5.2 Multi-Band OFDM (MB-OFDM) UWB Technology

    This form of ultra wideband technology uses a wide band or multiband orthogonal

    frequency division multiplex (MBOFDM) signal that is effectively a 500 MHz wide OFDM

    signal. This is 500 MHz signal is then hopped in frequency to enable it to occupy a

    sufficiently high bandwidth.

    1.6 Advantages of using Ultra-Wide-Band

    The main advantages of UWB technology are high data rates, low cost and low power. This

    means that many types of devices in the home and business environments, such as laptops,

    mobile phones, TVs, DVDs, memory sticks, digital cameras and MP3 players could be

    networked wirelessly at a data rate that would effectively be impossible using classical

  • 7

    radio technology. This is because of UWB's very large data rate at very low power and at

    low cost.

    Some forms of UWB allow distances to be measured accurately. The nature of the short-

    duration pulses used in UWB technology offers several advantages over narrowband

    communications systems.

    1. Large channel capacity

    Main advantage of UWB technology is perceived from the channel capacity. Channel

    capacity is the theoretical maximum possible number of bits per second of information

    which may be conveyed through one or more links in an area. According to the Shannon

    Hartley theorem channel capacity can be expressed as:

    C= B log2 (1+SNR)

    Where C represents the channel capacity in bits per second, B is the channel bandwidth in

    Hz and SNR is the signal-to-noise ratio.

    Thus channel capacity increases linearly with increasing channel's bandwidth to the

    maximum value available, or by increasing the signal power exponentially where

    bandwidth is fixed.[2] By virtue of the large bandwidths inherent in UWB systems, large

    channel capacities could be achieved in principle without invoking higher-order

    modulations requiring a very high SNR. Ideally, the receiver signal detector should match

    the transmitted signal in bandwidth, signal shape and time. A mismatch results in loss of

    margin for the UWB radio link. Several gigahertz of bandwidth available for UWB signals, a

    data rate of gigabits per second (Gbps) can be expected.

    2. Ability to Work with Low Signal to Noise Ratios

    The Hartley-Shannon formula for maximum capacity also indicates that the channel

    capacity is only logarithmically dependent on signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Therefore, UWB

    communications systems are capable of working in harsh communication channels with

    low SNRs and still offer a large channel capacity as a result of their large BW.

  • 8

    3. Ability to Share the Frequency Spectrum

    The FCCs requirement of 41.3dBm/MHz, 5 equal to 75 nano watts/MHz for UWB systems,

    puts them in the category of unintentional radiators, such as TVs and computer monitors.

    Such power restriction allows UWB systems to reside below the noise floor of a typical

    narrow band receiver and enables UWB signals to coexist with current radio services with

    minimal or no interference. However, this all depends on the type of modulation used for

    data transfer in a UWB system.

    4. Low Probability of Intercept (LPI) and Low Probability of Detection (LPD)

    Because of low average transmission power, UWB communications systems have an

    inherent immunity to detection and intercept. The extremely narrow pulse-width and low

    duty cycle because the UWB signals to be spread thinly over a wide bandwidth resulting in

    extremely low power spectral densities over GHz bandwidths. With such low transmission

    power, the eavesdropper has to be very close to the transmitter (about 1 meter) to be able

    to detect the transmitted information. In addition, UWB pulses are time modulated with

    codes unique to each transmitter/receiver pair. The time modulation of extremely narrow

    pulses adds more security to UWB transmission, because detecting picoseconds pulses

    without knowing when they will arrive is next to impossible. Therefore, UWB systems hold

    significant promise of achieving highly secure, low probability of intercept and detection

    communications that is a critical need for military operations.

    5. Resistance to Jamming

    Unlike the well-defined narrowband frequency spectrum, the UWB spectrum covers a vast

    range of frequencies from near DC to several gigahertz and offers high processing gain for

    UWB signals. Processing gain (PG) is a measure of a radio system's resistance to jamming

    and is defined as the ratio of the RF bandwidth to the information bandwidth of a signal:

    PG = RF Bandwidth

    Information Bandwidth

    The frequency diversity caused by high processing gain makes UWB signals relatively

    resistant to intentional and unintentional jamming, because no jammer can jam every

    frequency in the UWB spectrum at once. Therefore, if some of the frequencies are jammed,

  • 9

    there is still a large range of frequencies that remains untouched. However, this resistance

    to jamming is only in comparison to narrowband and wideband systems.

    6. Multipath Propagation Performance

    The phenomenon known as multipath is unavoidable in wireless communications

    channels. It is caused by multiple reflections of the transmitted signal from various surfaces

    such as buildings, trees, and people. The straight line between a transmitter and a receiver

    is the line of sight (LOS); the reflected signals from surfaces are non-line of sight (NLOS).

    The effect of multipath is rather severe for narrowband signals; it can cause signal

    degradation up to 40 dB due to the out-of-phase addition of LOS and NLOS continuous

    waveforms. On the other hand, the very short duration of UWB pulses makes them less

    sensitive to the multipath effect. Because the transmission duration of a UWB pulse is

    shorter than a nanosecond in most cases, the reflected pulse has an extremely short

    window of opportunity to collide with the LOS pulse and cause signal-degradation.

    7. Superior Penetration Properties

    Unlike narrowband technology, UWB systems can penetrate effectively through different

    materials. The low frequencies included in the broad range of the UWB frequency spectrum

    have long wavelengths, which allows UWB signals to penetrate a variety of materials,

    including walls. This property makes UWB technology viable for through-the-wall

    communications and ground-penetrating radars. However, the material penetration

    capability of UWB signals is useful only when they are allowed to occupy the low-frequency

    portion of the radio spectrum.

    8. Simple Transceiver Architecture

    UWB transmission is carrier-less, meaning that data is not modulated on a continuous

    waveform with a specific carrier frequency, as in narrowband and wideband technologies.

    Carrier-less transmission requires fewer RF components than carrier-based transmission.

    For this reason UWB transceiver architecture is significantly simpler and thus cheaper to

    build.

  • 10

    1.7 Potential Applications of Ultra-Wide-Band

    There have been tremendous research efforts to apply ultra wide band (UWB) technology

    to the military and government sectors. Some of them are already accomplished and some

    are intended for future.

    UWB technology can enable a wide variety of applications in wireless communications,

    networking, radar imaging, and localizing systems. The potential applications UWB are

    categorized into three parts:

    Communications and sensors

    Position location and tracking

    Radar applications

    1.7.1 Communications and Sensors

    For wireless communication the use of UWB technology offers significant potential for the

    deployment of 3 communication systems:

    Low Data Rate for Sensor Network:

    Under the low-rate operation mode, UWB technology could be beneficial and potentially

    useful in sensor, positioning and identification networks. A sensor network comprises a

    large number of nodes spread over a geographical area to be monitored. Depending on the

    specific application, the sensor nodes can be static or mobile. With its unique properties of

    low complexity, low cost and extremely low power spectral density (PSD), UWB technology

    is well suited to sensor networks. The innovative communication method of UWB at low

    data rate gives numerous benefits to different sectors. For instance, the wireless

    connection of computer peripherals such as mouse, monitor, keyboard, joystick and printer

    can utilize UWB technology. UWB allows the operation of multiples devices without

    interference at the same time in the same space. It can be used as a communication link in a

    sensor network. It can also create a security bubble around a specific area to ensure

    security. It is the best candidate to support a variety of WBAN applications. A network of

    UWB sensors such as electrocardiogram (ECG), oxygen saturation sensor (SpO2) and

    electromyography (EMG) can be used to develop a proactive and a smart healthcare

  • 11

    system. This can benefit the patient in chronic condition and provides long term health

    monitoring. In UWB system, the transmitter is often kept simpler and most of the

    complexity is shifted towards receiver, which permits extremely low energy consumption

    and thus extends battery life.

    High Data Rate:

    The unique applications of UWB systems in different scenarios have initially drawn much

    attention, since many applications of UWB spans around existing market needs for high

    data rate applications. Demand for high density multimedia applications is increasing,

    which needs innovative methods to better utilize the available bandwidth. UWB system has

    the property to fill the available bandwidth as demand increases. The problem of designing

    receiver and robustness against jamming are main challenges for high-rate applications.

    The large high-resolution video screens can benefit from UWB. These devices stream video

    content wirelessly from video source to a wall-mounted screen. Various high data rata

    applications include internet access and multimedia services, wireless peripheral

    interfaces and location based services. Regardless of the environment, very high data rate

    applications (>1 Gbps) have to be provided. The use of very large bandwidth at lower

    spectral efficiency has designated UWB system as a suitable candidate for high internet

    access and multimedia applications. Standardized wireless interconnection is highly

    desirable to replace cables and propriety plugs. The interconnectivity of various numbers

    of devices such as laptops and mobile phones is increasingly important for battery-

    powered devices.

    Home Network Applications:

    Home network application is a crucial factor to make pervasive home network

    environment. The wireless connectivity of different home electronic systems removes

    wiring clutter in living room. This is particularly important when we consider the bit rate

    needed for high definition television that is in excess of 30 Mbps over a distance of at least

    few meters. In IEEE 1394, an attempt has been made to integrate entertainment, consumer

    electronics and computing within a home environment. It provides isochronous mode

  • 12

    where data delivery is guaranteed with constant transmission speed. It is important for

    real time applications such as video broadcasts.

    1.7.2 Position Location and Tracking

    Position location and tracking have wide range of benefits such as locating patient in case

    of critical condition, hikers injured in remote area, tracking cars, and managing a variety of

    goods in a big shopping mall. For active RF tracking and positioning applications, the short-

    pulse UWB techniques offer distinct advantages in precision time-of-flight measurement,

    multipath immunity for leading edge detection, and low prime power requirements for

    extended-operation RF identification. The reason of supporting human-space intervention

    is to identify the persons and the objects the user aims at, and identifying the target task of

    the user. Knowing where a person is, we can figure out near to what or who this person is

    and finally make a hypothesis what the user is aiming at. This human-space intervention

    could improve quality of life when used in a WBAN. In a WBAN, a number of intelligent

    sensors are used to gather patients data and forwards it to a PDA which is further

    forwarded to a remote server. In case of critical condition such as arrhythmic disturbances,

    the correct identification of patients location could assist medical experts in treatment.

    1.7.3 Radar Applications

    Short-pulse UWB techniques have several radar applications such as higher range

    measurement accuracy and range resolution, enhanced target recognition, increased

    immunity to co-located radar transmissions, increased detection probability for certain

    classes of targets and ability to detect very slowly moving or stationary targets. UWB is a

    leading technology candidate for micro air vehicles (MAV) applications. The nature of

    creating millions of ultra-wideband pulses per second has the capability of high

    penetration in a wide range of materials such as building materials, concrete block, plastic

    and wood.

    1.8 Ultra-Wide-Band Design Challenges

    Designing UWB systems have several challenges, some of which have not been reached

    before in traditional narrowband systems. One particular design techniques have evolved

    to handle narrowband signals extremely efficiently, but these techniques do not apply UWB

  • 13

    systems. Furthermore, since the entire system power consumption is no longer dominated

    by the radiation power, achieving low power consumption in the LNA and mixer is

    extremely important.

    The requirement for maximum total power consumption set by the 802.15.3a specification

    at 110 Mb/s and 200 Mb/s is 100 mW and 250 mW, respectively. Which implies that, in

    case of designing a UWB transceiver, a power save mode must be supported. To meet these

    constraints, a transceiver must either target the lowest power for all data rates or use an

    architecture that scales power with data rate. It is also advantageous to have an

    architecture that scales power consumption under optimal channel conditions.

    Another challenge is narrowband jammers. Due to the wide operational band of UWB,

    interferences from existing radio systems are unavoidable. The FCC spectral mask for UWB

    EIRP is -41.3 dBm/MHz, Which is low enough to not cause interference to other wireless

    system sharing the same bandwidth. However, this does not guarantee that in-band

    narrowband transmitters do not saturate UWB receivers. This presents a serious challenge

    for UWB since other systems operating in the same band usually have much higher

    transmitted powers. For example, the transmitted power of cellular radios can be up to +30

    dBm, which are several orders of magnitude higher than UWB transmitters are permitted.

    1.9 Objective of this thesis

    The objective of this thesis is to design a ultra-wideband (UWB) low noise amplifier (LNA)

    with minimum noise figure, Maximum Signal Voltage gain transfer, minimum power

    dissipation

    1.10 Organization of this thesis

    This thesis begins with an overview of UWB signals and systems followed by a discussion

    about UWB LNA and then proceeds this research in two sections: a simple single ended

    inductively degenerated LNA with resistive shunt feedback and a fully differential LNA

    based on the single ended LNA proposed before. Both sections analyze the performance of

    the LNA and systems in detail, and numerous measurements accompany the design choices

    to show the improvements and tradeoffs. The final chapter concludes and discusses

    exciting new research directions that expand this body of work.

  • 14

    Chapter 2

    UWB Low Noise Amplifier

    Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) is an electronic amplifier, located close to the detection device

    which can reduce the losses in the feedline. It is placed at the front of a radio receiver

    circuit. The receivers front end is dominated by the first few stages. The effect of noise

    from these stages of the receiver chain is reduced by the gain of LNA, while the noise is

    injected directly into the receiver signal. So for a LNA, to boost the desired signal power is

    necessary. Its main function is to amplify extremely low signals without adding noise, thus

    preserving the required Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) of the system at extremely low power

    levels.[3] Additionally, for large signal levels, the LNA amplifies the received signal without

    introducing any distortions, which eliminates channel interference.

    Figure 2.1: (a) Block Diagram of LNA at receiving end

  • 15

    Figure 2.1: (b) Signal processing.

    A good LNA has-

    1. A low NF (like 1 db)

    2. A large enough gain (like 20 db)

    3. A large enough intermodulation (IP3) and compression point (P1 db)

    Criteria are- 1.Operating bandwidth

    2. Gain flatness

    3. Stability

    4. Input-output voltage standing wave ratio (VSWR)

    Figure 2.2: Combination of power amplifier circuit and LNA circuit.

  • 16

    2.1 Parameters in LNA Design

    For any communication system LNAs are basic building blocks. There are 4 important

    parameters are in LNA design:

    1. Noise figure

    2. Input impedance match

    3. Gain

    4. Linearity

    2.1.1 Noise Figure

    The ratio between the total output noise power due to all noise sources and the output

    noise power generated by the source internal resistance is known as noise figure (NF).[4]

    Measuring noise figure in low noise elements become particularly important to the

    development of next generation communications system. This application note examines

    the process of making practical noise figure measurements of low noise amplifiers. Keeping

    a low NF is a crucial process when designing the LNA.

    According to Friis for n-stage network equation is:

    NFt = 1+ (NF1-1) + (NF2-1)/Ap1 + (NF3-1)/Ap2Ap3 +..+ (NFn-1)/Ap1 Ap(n-1)

    Where, Ap =gain of the stage

    Overall NF is dominated by NF1.

    We can discard the noise contribution of the later stages on overall noise figure

    calculation[5], which means we could only focus on the noise situation, which is given

    below:

  • 17

    Figure 2.3: Equivalent small signal circuit.

    It contains current noise in drain ), current noise in gate ,

    resistance from Rg and Lg

    ). The noise figure of such LNA can be expressed as:

    .. (1)

    Where,

    .. (2)

    Here,

    = Gate noise in the channel

    = Thermal noise in the channel

    gm1/gdo1 ( =1 in long channel devices)

    QL= 1/ 0RsCgs1 = Quality factor of input match network

    Cgs1= WLCox

    c=0.395 (even consider the short-channel effect [6])

    0=work frequency

    r=resonance frequency gm1/Cgs1

  • 18

    From (1) and (2) we get that,

    The value of QL.opt = 3.5 5.5

    Finally F reaches its minimun value and that is[7]:

    The channel bandwidth,

    .(3)

    2.1.2 Input Impedance Match

    It is mainly conjugate pair of load and source impedances. The input impedance of the

    amplifier (Zin) which is now tuned to the source impedance (Z0) using two inductors LS and

    Lg. From figure 2.3 input impedance of LNA is expressed as:

    Zin=sLg+RLg+Rg+Z1

    Where,

    Z1= sLs+1/sCgs1+ TLs

    We can adjust Ls to make the input impedance that equals Rs (50) when working

    frequency is close to 0 ,which means Zin=Re(Zin) = TLs=Rs ; (neglecting RLg & Rg)[8]

    Ls =Rs/ T

    & Lgs=1/ 02Cgs1-Ls

    Ls does not affect the real part of Zin.

  • 19

    To get more degrees in the design, we can add additional hardware to the input impedance

    matching network. It is possible for more area on the chip.[9]

    Figure 2.4: More hardware in the input matching network.

    2.1.3 Gain

    LNA must have high gain for the processing of signal into post circuit. High gain LNA is

    designed for application by manufacturer. If the LNA doesn't have high gain, the signal will

    be affected in by noise in LNA circuit itself. So high gain of LNA is a important parameter of

    LNA. An inductive load is used to maximize amplifier gain and linearity. The power gain is

    given by when LNA is matched at input and output.

    Figure 2.5: Equivalent circuit with inductive source degeneration.

  • 20

    From this equivalent circuit,we can express the transconductance (Gm1) of the first stage

    (common source):

    T/2 0Rs

    For a certain technology we considered that gm= nCox(W/L)(VGS-VTS),all parameters are

    fixed except channel bandwidth. For large gain,we can increase W for the weak signal.

    According to equation (3), increased width could elevate noise figure and introduce to

    more noise to LNA.

    2.1.4 Linearity

    Linearity is an important parameter of LNA. There are many ways to describe the linearity

    of LNA. High linearity is necessary for low adjacent channel leakage power. For linearity,

    third order (IP3) intercept point is the commonly used method. The IIP3 is plotted

    graphically by plotting the output power verses the input power both on dB scales. Here

    two curves are drawn:

    1. One for the linearly amplified signal at an input tone frequency

    2. Another for a non-linear product

    Figure 2.6: CP1 and 3rd order intercept point.

  • 21

    From the figure 2.6, it shows 1 dB compression point (P1 dB) and 3rd order intercept point

    (IP3). IP3 is a figure of merit for linearity. For the derivation of IP3, two-tone test is

    typically used. IP3 is an important parameter for system designers to estimate the spurious

    free dynamic range (SFDR).

    The P1 dB is defined as the point where the gain has dropped by 1 dB on the logarithmic

    scale of gain as a function of input power. The point where the curves of the fundamental

    signal and third order distortion product signal intercept, is known as IP3.The input power

    level is known as IIP3 and the output power is known as OIP3.Figure 2.6 shows the output

    power vs. input power of the fundamental frequency and the 3rd order intermodulation

    (IMD3) product.[10]

    The method of measuring two-tone IP3, begins by applying two sinusoids to the circuits

    input at frequencies f1 and f2. The frequencies at which the IMD3 products appear for the

    signals:

    2f1 f2

    2f2 f1

    Where,

    2f1 = 2nd harmonic of f1

    2f2 = 2nd harmonic of f2

    Figure 2.7: Two-tones with the IDM3 product.[11]

  • 22

    IP3 can be calculated by two equations:

    OIP3=P1st+(P1st-P3rd)/2 dBm

    IIP3=OPI3-G dBm

    Where,

    P1st = Power of the fundamental in dbm

    P3rd= Power of the 3rd order intermodutlation product in dbm[12]

    To increase the current density or current draw of the LNA is the easiest way to improve

    the IP3 performance.

    2.2 Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) Topologies

    There are various types of LNA topologies. The two well-known topology structure found

    are common source (CS) topology and common gate topology (CG). There are various other

    possible topologies, such as:

    1. Distributed Amplifier (DA) topology

    2. Common Gate (CG) Topology

    3. Inductively degenerated common source topology (IDCS)

    4. Cascode Topology

    5. Folded Cascode Topology

    6. Cascade Topology

    7. Current reuse topology

    8. Differential topology

    9. Novel topology

  • 23

    2.2.1 Amplifier Distributed (DA)

    Distributed amplifiers are widely used in wideband LNA design. This type of structure

    which utilizes several stages of common-source amplifiers is well-known for large power

    and area consumption (0.8mm2 in and 1.4mm2 in ). It combines the parasitic gate-source

    capacitance with on-chip inductors to build transmission lines which have intrinsic

    broadband frequency response that goes all the way down to DC.

    Figure 2.8: Generalized structure of distributed LNA.[10]

    Features of DA topology are:

    The capability of designing on-chip T-lines, and high-Q inductors

    Integrated circuits incorporating on-chip T-lines

    In frequency domain, the transistors parasitic capacitances are absorbed

    into the constants of the T-line

    Until the cut-off frequency of the line itself is reached, the circuits bandwidth

    remains approximately constant

    Capable of providing a wideband input/output matching

    Advantages of DA topology are:

    Very broad band performance

    Good Input/output matching

    Power combining characteristics

    Partially isolated port for dc bias injection[13]

  • 24

    Drawbacks of DA topology are:

    Large silicon area, which is due to the presence of several on-chip inductors

    and/or transmission lines

    High power consumption that is related to the number of stages

    required to enhance the gain

    2.2.2 Common Gate (CG)

    The conventional common-gate low-noise amplifier (CGLNA) exhibits a relatively high

    noise figure (NF) at low operating frequencies relative to the MOSFET fT, which has limited

    its adoption even though its superior linearity, input matching, and stability compared to

    the inductively degenerated (CS-LNA). The design of a low-power inductorless LNA using a

    capacitive cross-coupled (CCC) gm -boosting and a positive feedback schemes is described

    that improves the NF and retains the advantages of the CGLNA. The LNA designed in 0.13

    mum CMOS shows more than 15 dB input return loss, maximum gain of 18.2 dB, NF of 2.86

    dB, and the third-order input intercept point (IIP3) is 2 dB while dissipating 1.8 mA from

    1.2 V supply.

    Figure 2.9: Conventional CG- LNA and low noise techniques employing feedback. [10]

  • 25

    Features of CG topology are:

    It is a parallel resonance as opposed to the series resonance of the

    inductor-degenerated LNA

    Low Q (quality factor)

    Wider bandwidth

    Advantages of CG topology are:

    Wide operation BW

    Accurate ranging

    Extremely high-speed data communication

    Drawbacks of CG topology are:

    Number of on-chip inductors

    Becomes more troublesome when designing a balanced or differential LNA

    Large group-delay variation due to several resonances in the input-

    matching network

    It requires moderate to large silicon area and introduces a high insertion-

    loss that degrades the amplifier NF and gain

  • 26

    2.2.3 Inductively Degenerated Common Source Topology (IDCS)

    The inductive source degeneration design is widely used in ultra-wideband low noise

    amplifier (3.1-10.6 GHz band). It is a widely used topology in narrow-band RF applications.

    The cascode device decouples the input and output matching.

    Figure 2.10: (a) Conventional inductively degenerated common source

    configuration for narrow band applications. [10]

    (b) Inductive degenerated CS for UWB.

    Features of IDCS topology are:

    Increases the voltage gain of the LNA & the output impedance

    Additional cascode device provides large active load to improve voltage

    gain at high frequency

    Advantages of IDCS topology are:

    High gain, low noise, high linearity over a wide frequency range

    Doesnt use any off-chip components, it can be easily integrated as one

    part of a complete low-voltage transceiver

    Drawback of IDCS topology is:

    Comparatively large in size.

  • 27

    2.2.4 Cascode Topology

    The cascode is a two-stage amplifier composed of a transconductance amplifier followed by

    a current buffer. Compared to a single amplifier stage, this combination may have one or

    more of the following characteristics: higher input-output isolation, higher input

    impedance, high output impedance, higher gain or higher bandwidth. In modern circuits,

    the cascode is often constructed from two transistors (BJTs or FETs), with one operating as

    a common emitter or common source and the other as a common base or common gate.

    The cascode improves input-output isolation (or reverse transmission) as there is no direct

    coupling from the output to input.

    Figure 2.11: Cascode configuration. [10]

    Features of Cascode topology are:

    Increases the voltage gain of the LNA & the output impedance

    Additional cascode device provides large active load to improve voltage

    gain at high frequency

    Advantages of Cascode topology are:

    High gain, low noise, high linearity over a wide frequency range

    Doesnt use any off-chip components, it can be easily integrated as one

    part of a complete low-voltage transceiver

    Drawback of Cascode topology is:

    Comparatively large in size

  • 28

    2.2.5 Folded Cascode Topology

    The basic folded cascode consists of three fundamental circuit elements: a common-base

    transistor, an associated emitter resistor and a voltage reference, which is connected to the

    base of the cascode transistor. The input of such a stage is in the form of a current, which is

    applied to the emitter of the common-base transistor. The output is also in the form of a

    current, available at the collector of the common-base transistor.

    Figure 2.12: Folded cascade configuration. [10]

    Features of Folded Cascode topology are:

    Composed of one NMOS transistor & one PMOS transistor

    Requires a large supply voltage

    Total transconductance is increased with the same current consumption

    Advantages of Folded Cascode topology are:

    Possesses exclusive advantages in terms of amplifier linearity noise figure,

    and bias stability

    One single transistor exists in each DC path which increases the voltage

    swing and consequently improves the circuit linearity and power gain

    Drawback of Folded Cascode topology is:

    The inherently low gain is one of the major concerns as the current

    consumption is limited

  • 29

    2.2.6 Cascade Topology

    A cascade amplifier or topology is any diode constructed from a series of amplifiers. It is

    basically a differential amplifier with one input grounded and the side with the real input

    has no load. It can also be seen as a common collector (emitter follower) followed by a

    common base. Since the input side has no load there is no gain on that side and the Miller

    effect does not come into play.

    Features of Cascade topology are:

    Found in multi section or multi stage circuit topology

    Two or more stages connected to achieve the high gain

    Advantages of Cascade topology are:

    Two or more LNA blocks of CS and CG can be connected in cascade to get

    desired gain

    Drawbacks of Cascade topology are:

    Supply voltage requirement is more in cascade topology

    Consumes large silicon area as compared to cascode topology

    2.2.7 Current Reuse Topology

    Low power low voltage operation is found to be the bottleneck of future CMOS system

    implementations. To comply with these constrains, a current reuse configuration is here

    reported to design UWB Low Noise Amplifiers (LNA).

  • 30

    Figure 2.13: Conventional current reuse configuration. [10]

    Features of Current Reuse topology are:

    Reduce the power consumption of LNA

    Preserve high gain

    The power consumption, noise and the IIP3 can be improved

    Advantages of Current Reuse topology are:

    Suitable configuration for LNA implementation because of its low DC

    power consumption, high and flat gain, low NF and high reverse

    isolation

    Can be used with any circuit configuration like cascode, CS,CG and

    feedback topologies or even with multi stage cascaded structures to

    reduce the DC power consumption

    Drawbacks of Current Reuse topology are:

    Since the second stage of the traditional current-reused LNA topology

    requires a DC bias as well as biasing resistor, they will result in extra

    noise and signal leakage

    High input and output impedances, thus requiring external impedance

    matching networks

  • 31

    2.2.8 Differential Topology

    Differential topology considers the properties and structures that require only a smooth

    structure on a manifold to be defined. Smooth manifolds are 'softer' than manifolds with

    extra geometric structures, which can act as obstructions to certain types of equivalences

    and deformations that exist in differential topology.

    Figure 2.14: Differential capacitive cross coupled configuration.

    Figure 2.15: Noise cancelling principle of differential topology. [10]

    Features of Differential topology are:

    Can Highly diminish the 2nd order nonlinearity

    Shunt series triple resonance peaking technique is adopted to achieve

    wideband flat gain

  • 32

    Advantages of Differential topology are:

    Provide the input matching and low noise figure, but the power gain of

    6.1-8.5dB (or 5.2-8.2dB) is insufficient to suppress the noise of the

    subsequent components

    Input matching, high power gain, and low noise figure under the

    wideband condition

    Better immunity to environmental noise, improved linearity, low power

    consumption

    Drawbacks of Differential topology are:

    Not suitable for low-power applications

    Single-stage LNAs consume low power but their output bandwidth

    cannot provide the flat-high-gain response

    2.2.9 Novel Topology

    Few novel topologies are also possible other than the topologies discussed above. Novel

    topology is nothing but the combination of above basic topology with either bandwidth

    extension techniques or noise cancelling techniques. Even in few papers topology is

    invented to optimize BW, gain and NF simultaneously at the cost of other parameters.

    2.3 Proposed Topology

    After taking all the benefits and drawbacks of different topologies, Inductively Degenerated

    Common Source (IDCS) and Cascode topology is chosen for higher gain, better input

    impedence matching and Differential LNA is chosen for linearity and stability along with

    reverse isolation and immunity to noise. Easement of designing as well as further

    improvement of the device is also given priority.

  • 33

    Chapter 3

    Architecture of proposed UWB LNA and Simulation

    Results

    For the UWB receiver using direct-conversion architecture, Low Noise Amplifier (LNA) is

    an important system block. It is the first gain stage after antenna in the receive path, so the

    LNA noise figure is critical since it directly adds to the total noise figure of whole system. It

    is also expected for LNA to have good gain, linearity and stability. Furthermore, good

    reverse isolation is desirable for LNA to reduce the amount of LO signal that leaks from the

    mixer back to antenna.

    Figure 3.1: Block Diagram of LNA

    Based on the way input matching is provided LNA can be classified into four

    architectures [13] : Resistive termination, 1/gm termination, shunt-series feedback and

    inductive degeneration.

  • 34

    Resistive termination technique is a straightforward matching method which uses a

    resistor at the input port to provide a termination of 50 impedance. It suffers from poor

    noise performance due to the deleterious effect of real resistor at input port.

    Figure 3.2: Common LNA Architectures: Resistive termination

    The 1/gm termination method uses the source of common gate stage as the termination

    point and the impedance is set by the 1/gm of the transistor in the common gate stage. It is

    more suitable for bipolar transistor than CMOS to achieve low noise figure performance.

    Figure 3.3: Common LNA Architectures: 1/gm termination

  • 35

    Shunt-series feedback uses shunt series feedback to set the input and output impedances of

    the system. The bias point of the input is fixed with the output voltage. This method can

    increase the power dissipation compared to others with similar noise performance.

    Figure 3.4: Common LNA Architectures: Shunt-series feedback

    The inductive source degeneration method employs inductor at source terminal to

    generate a real term for the input impedance.

    Figure 3.5: Common LNA Architectures: Inductive degeneration

    This method often works with cascode transistor and has been widely used for LNA design

    due to its good noise performance, reverse isolation and high feasible gain.

    In this paper, an inductively degenerated LNA with resistive shunt feedback is adopted to

    achieve wide bandwidth and good noise performance.

  • 36

    3.1 Architecture of the proposed LNA

    Figure 3.6 shows the simplified block diagram of the proposed LNA architecture, where

    two simple inductively degenerated LNA with resistive shunt feedback is paired to make a

    Differential LNA to get higher linearity, better input matching, higher power gain and lower

    noise figure for wide band application.

    Figure 3.6: Simplified Block Diagram of proposed LNA

  • 37

    3.1.1 Single Ended LNA

    As shown in Fig. 3.5, this LNA employs cascode transistor (M1 and M2) to reduce miller

    effect of gate-drain capacitor (Cgd) and enhance gain. Inductor Ls is for simultaneous noise

    and input matching; inductor Lg is for the impedance matching between the source

    resistance Rs and the input of the LNA.

    Figure 3.7: LNA topology for UWB single ended LNA [13]

    Capacitor Cgs in Fig. 3.3 represents the gate-source capacitance of the input transistor M1.

    Resistor Rf is a shunt feedback resistor added to the conventional cascode narrowband

    LNA. The capacitor Cf is for ac signal coupling purpose. The inductor Lload is a shunt peaking

    inductor at the output port. The large amplitude range of signals, received in antenna in

    wireless communications systems, requires variable gain stages to enhance the signal to

    the noise ratio (SNR). The variable gain feature is realized by including an additional n-type

    MOSFET in parallel with the cascode device in the traditional cascode LNA.

  • 38

    Figure 3.8: LNA topology for UWB LNA Small-signal equivalent circuit of the input of LNA

    While in high-gain mode, the original cascode device steers current signal to LC load and

    the additional NMOS bypasses the signal directly to VDD to lower the gain in low gain mode.

    Note that in Fig.3.5, Ms1 is used to bypass the signal in lower gain mode. As shown in the

    small-signal equivalent circuit (Fig. 3.6) for input part of this LNA, a series combination of

    reactive elements is chosen to have a serial resonance at the frequencies of interest. The

    symbol t means the cutoff frequency of transistor M1. The -3-dB bandwidth of a typical

    RLC resonant circuit is inversely proportional to its Q-factor (BW-3db=0/QWB), where QWB

    is approximately determined by following equation.

    Where, Rfm=Rf/[1-Av] and Av represents the open-loop voltage gain of LNA. The key role of

    the shunt-feedback resistor Rf is to reduce the Q-factor of the LNA input circuit. With low Q-

    factor, LNA is capable of providing wide bandwidth (BW-3dB). Resistor Rf also helps in

    flattening the gain over a wide bandwidth of frequencies with small noise figure

    degradation.

  • 39

    Simulation Results of Single Ended LNA

    Simulation results show that Single Ended LNA has S21 gain of 10dB with bandwidth 1GHz

    between 8GHz and 9GHz with center Frequency 8.5GHz. Simulation results are shown in

    Fig 3.9 to Fig 3.12.

    Fig 3.9: S21of Single Ended LNA

    Fig 3.10: S11of Single Ended LNA

  • 40

    Fig 3.11: AC output Noise Figure of Single Ended LNA

    At the center frequency 8.5GHz Noise figure of the Single Ended LNA is 2dB. Maximum

    Power gain of this LNA is 18.35dB at 7GHz, and 18dB at the center frequency.

    Fig 3.12: Maximum Power Gain of Single Ended LNA

  • 41

    3.1.2 Differential LNA

    LNA in our design, according to the specifications, is differential with variable gain mode.

    Since the transceiver architecture is Zero-IF architecture, the output load is the capacitive

    impedance seen by LNA when connected to the next mixer stage. A reasonable estimate of

    the value of input capacitance of the mixer is 400 fF and is used in our design and

    simulations in parallel with a 200 resistance. As shown in Fig. 3.4, a full-differential LNA

    is designed based on the single-ended LNA in previous section.

    Figure 3.13: Differential LNA [13]

    The most important advantage of differential LNAs over single-end ones is that differential

    LNA has much higher immunity to environmental noise. This is to make sure that an

    adequate rejection of the noise and the interfering signals traveling through the common

    substrate.

  • 42

    Design Procedure

    The load inductor Lload= 2.664 nH is designed to resonate with the output capacitance (400

    fF) and the parasitic drain capacitance of the cascode transistor at the center frequency of

    the band. If we assume Cd,M2 200fF, then output resonance frequency is:

    In order to reduce the Q-factor and improve the bandwidth of the output network, a small

    resistor Load= 5 is added in series with the load inductor. The source input matching is

    achieved by selecting the source degeneration inductor Ls= 0.17 nH to match the input

    resistor 50 such that

    The gate inductance Lg= 2.223 nH resonates with Cgs and parasitic source capacitance

    (300 fF) of low-gain mode transistor at resonance frequency:

    As mentioned earlier, the feedback resistance Rf= 1.14 k and Cf= 2 pF are chosen to

    reduce the Q-factor of the input network and AC coupling respectively.

    The bias resistance Rbias= 1.417 k is chosen high enough to minimize its noise power

    contribution, which is given by:

  • 43

    While selecting the W/L ratio of the input transistors, trade-off between the noise power

    contributed and the gain needs to be considered. The noise power of the n-channel

    MOSFET is given by:

    Whereas gain is:

    If gm is increased to improve the gain, the noise contributed by the MOSFET increases

    proportionally. The W/L ratio of the cascode transistor is selected such that the ratio of

    gms of M1 and M2 is close to 550. Finally, the W/L of the low-gain mode transistor is

    optimized to give the necessary gain in the low-gain mode.

    3.1.3 Balun Circuit

    A Balun is a device which converts unbalanced impedance to balanced and vice versa. A

    Balun Circuit is used whenever a circuit design requires signals on two lines that are equal

    in magnitude and 180 degrees out of phase. In our Design we have used Balun to create

    differential input and achieve differential output.

    Figure 3.14: Balun Circuit

  • 44

    3.2 Final Simulation Results

    The Design was simulated with BSIM3 model provided for 0.18 m RF CMOS process. Some

    of the important parameters for LNA such as S21, S11, S12, S22, Power gain and Noise Figure

    are simulated in HSpice. Figures 3.13 to 3.24 show the corner simulations for each of

    these parameters.

    Fig 3.15: S21 (dB) of Differential LNA

    Fig 3.16: S11 (dB) of Differential LNA

  • 45

    Fig3.17: Comparison between S21 and S11

    Gain and input matching parameters (S21 and S11) are plotted in Fig 3.15 to Fig 3.17. S21 of

    the proposed LNA is plotted in Fig 3.15. S21 is around 8dB from 4.8GHz to 9GHz. It can be

    compared with S21 of the single ended LNA in Fig 3.10. S21 of Single ended LNA is 10dB

    from 5.6GHz to 9GHz. Comparison shows that Differential LNA gets wider bandwidth but

    lower gain.

    Fig 3.16 shows S11 of the Differential LNA, which has a value of -30dB at 8.9GHz. Comparing

    this plot with the S11 of single ended LNA of Fig 3.11, we get Single ended LNA has a S11 of -

    12dB.

    So, S21 and S11 of Fig 3.17 assure good input matching of the network.

  • 46

    Fig 3.18: AC output Noise figure of Differential LNA

    Fig 3.18 shows the AC output noise figure and Fig 3.19 shows the stability factor of the

    proposed LNA. AC output noise figure is less than 2.5dB.

    Fig 3.19: Minimum AC output Noise figure of Differential LNA

  • 47

    Fig 3.20: S22 of Differential LNA

    Fig 3.20 shows the S22 of the proposed LNA and the Comparison between S11 and S22 is

    shown in Fig 3.21.

    Fig 3.21: Comparison between S11 and S22 of Differential LNA

  • 48

    Fig 3.22: S12 of Differential LNA

    Fig 3.22 shows the S12 of the LNA of this work. The output noise is shown in Fig 3.23.

    Fig 3.23: Output Noise of Differential LNA

  • 49

    Fig 3.25: Input Noise (dB) of Differential LNA

    The input Noise is shown in 3.25. Fig 3.26 shows the comparison between input noise and

    output noise.

    Fig 3.26: Comparison between input noise (dB) and output noise (dB)

  • 50

    Fig 3.24: Maximum Power Gain of Differential LNA

    Maximum power gain of the proposed LNA is shown in Fig 3.24. At 7GHz we get the

    maximum power gain with a value of 18.3dB. At center Frequency 8.9GHz Power Gain is

    more than 18dB.

    Comparison of performance between Single ended LNA and Differential LNA in this paper

    is given in the table below.

    Table3.1: Comparison of performance between Single ended LNA and Differential LNA

    Parameter Single Ended Double Ended

    Frequency 8.6GHz 8.9 GHz

    Power Supply Voltage 1.8 V 1.8 V

    Power Consumption 5.6 mW 2.7mW

    S21 10 dB 8dB

    S11 -12dB -30dB

    Noise Figure 2dB 2.15dB

  • 51

    The performance of the proposed Differential LNA is summarized in the table below.

    Table3.2: Performance of LNA

    Figure Value

    Maximum Gain 18 dB

    BW-3dB 7.5-10.6GHz

    Noise Figure < 2 dB

    S11 -27 dB

    S21 8 dB

    Power Consumption 27mW

    Bias Current 15mA

    Comparison with other works in the reference is given in the table below.

    Table3.3: Comparison with other LNA from the bibliography

    Technology Bandwidth Gain NF Differential Input Match Power

    [15] 0.5m 100 900 MHz

    14.8 dB 3.3 dB no no 3.4 mA 3.3V

    [11] 0.35m 50 900 MHz 11 dB 4.4 dB no yes 1.5 mA 3.3V

    [14] 0.25m 2 1600 MHz 13.7 dB 2.5 dB no yes 14 mA 2.5V

    [16] 0.18m .8 1 GHz 26 dB 4.1 dB yes yes 20 mA 1.8V

    [17] 0.13m 100 930 MHz

    13 dB 4 dB yes yes 0.6 mA 1.2V

    This work

    0.18 m 8.2-9.4GHz 18 dB < 2 dB yes yes 15mA 1.8V

  • 52

    Chapter 4

    Conclusion

    4.1 Summary of Contribution

    A simple inductively degenerated single ended LNA proposed by [13] has been modified

    to improve LNA gain, Bandwidth and Noise Figure. A differential topology of the single

    ended LNA has also been implemented in this work. The aspect ratio of the MOS

    transistor has been optimized in this work for increasing LNA gain. Resistance and

    Inductance of the circuit has also been optimized for better matching of the circuit to

    improve the reflection coefficient (S11). The circuit has been simulated in HSpice and

    HSpice simulation results shows wider bandwidth of 8.2 9.4GHz and higher power gain

    of 18dB, better matching performance with S11 around -30dB at 8.8GHz.

    4.2 Future Work

    LNA in this paper can be extended to operate in other band groups of UWB standard

    either by tuning the inductances and capacitances or placing the different matching

    circuitry for each band in parallel. Combinations of these methods can also be used to

    achieve the same. The simulations on layout are not available at the time of publishing

    this paper due to certain limitations in the design kit, which have not been completely

    resolved, can be solved in future.

    The Noise Figure of the LNA can significantly be improved if a noise cancelling technique

    is applied. In the future, noise canceling methods should be investigated while trying to

    maintain the other performance measures at almost the same level.

    Another issue to be addressed is that the input return loss is relatively high. This is

    because the input matching network was not optimized for input return loss, as it was

    designed to optimize gain, noise figure and power dissipation instead. However, this

  • 53

    problem could likely be solved by trading off increased power consumption for a better

    input return loss.

    At the circuit level, managing the tradeoff between supply voltage, clock speed, and

    power consumption has been widely explored for digital circuits. However, analog

    designers are faced with a few challenges without answers as transistors continue to

    scale: creating new architectures to support low voltage operation and/or operating at

    the optimal supply voltage. Instead of blindly following voltage scaling for digital

    circuits, it is important to revisit and analyze tradeoffs made when important techniques

    and architectures such as cascoding and op-amps cannot be used. Ultimately, to survive

    with voltage scaling, analog designers must think in sub-systems of simple circuits that

    functionally provide the same (or better!) performance as compared to well-known,

    monolithic analog circuits.

    In summary, the UWB LNA has room for improvement. However, it is important to pay

    attention to the overall performance (the figure of merit) in order to decide whether a

    particular modification is acceptable.

  • HSpice netlists

    Single ended LNA .temp 27 .options post .param Vdd=1.8 .global gnd lload nvdd 1 2.664nH lg nin+ 7 2.223nH ls 4 gnd 0.17nH rload 1 2 5 rf 2 5 1.14K rbias 6 nvbias 1.417K cf 5 6 2pF c1 7 6 300fF c2 2 nvout 400fF Ms nvdd nvm 6 cmosn l=0.18u w=100u M2 2 nvdd 3 cmosn l=0.18u w=100u M1 3 6 4 cmosn l=0.18u w=100u vbias nvbias gnd dc=0.8v vm nvm gnd dc=0.8v vdd nvdd gnd dc=1.8v *vin nin+ gnd dc ac 500mv 0 .ac lin 50 3G 15G P1 nin+ gnd port=1 z0=50 dc = 0 P2 nvout gnd port=2 z0=50 .lin noisecalc=1 sparcalc=1 .print ac s11(db) s12(db) s21(db) s22(db) .print ac nf(db) nfmin(db) .print g_max .probe .end

  • Differential LNA .temp 27 .options post .param Vdd=1.8 .global gnd .subckt balun 1 2 3 4 E1 5 2 1 0 0.5 V1 3 5 F1 1 0 V1 -0.5 R1 1 0 1T E2 6 4 1 0 0.5 V2 2 7 F2 1 0 V2 -0.5 R2 7 6 1u .ends balun *part 1 lload1 nvdd 1 2.664nH lg1 nin+ 7 2.223nH ls1 4 gnd 0.17nH rload1 1 2 5 rf1 2 5 1.14K rbias1 6 nvbias 1.417K cf1 5 6 2pF c1 7 6 300fF c2 2 nvout1 400fF Ms1 nvdd nvm 6 cmosn l=0.18u w=100u M2 2 nvdd 3 cmosn l=0.18u w=100u M1 3 6 4 cmosn l=0.18u w=100u *part 2 lload2 nvdd 8 2.664nH lg2 nin- 14 2.223nH ls2 11 gnd 0.17nH rload2 8 9 5 rf2 12 9 1.14K rbias2 13 nvbias 1.417K

  • cf2 12 13 2pF c3 14 13 300fF c4 9 nvout2 400fF Ms2 nvdd nvm 13 cmosn l=0.18u w=100u M4 9 nvdd 10 cmosn l=0.18u w=100u M3 10 13 11 cmosn l=0.18u w=100u vbias nvbias gnd dc=0.8v vdd nvdd gnd dc=1.8v *vin nin gnd dc ac 500mv 0 xdi d c nin+ nin- balun xdo dd cd nvout1 nvout2 balun .ac lin 50 3G 12G P1 d gnd port=1 z0=50 dc = 0 P2 dd gnd port=2 z0=50 .print ac s11(db) s12(db) s21(db) s22(db) .print ac nf(db) nfmin(db) .print noise inoise(db) onoise(db) .print ac g_max .lin noisecalc=1 sparcalc=1

    .end

  • Bibliography

    [1] Ultra-Wideband Communications: Fundamentals and Applications By Faranak Nekoogar

    [2] Ultra-Wideband Communications Systems: Multiband OFDM Approach By W. Pam

    Siriwongpairat, K. J. Ray Liu

    [3] Nejati, H.; Ragheb, T.; Nieuwoudt, A.; Massoud, Y., Modeling and Design of Ultrawideband

    Low Noise Amplifiers with Generalized Impedance Matching Networks, ISCAS 2007. IEEE,

    p.2622-2625, (2007)

    [4] Nejati, H.; Ragheb, T.; Massoud, Y., Analytical Modeling of Common-Gate Low Noise

    Amplifiers, ISCAS.2008, IEEE, p.888

    [5] T. H. Lee, The Design of CMOS Radio-Frequency Integrated Circuits (second edition),

    Publishing House of Electronics Industry, 2006

    [6] Jiwei Chen, Bingxue Shi, Analysis and optimization of the impact of channel resistance on

    CMOS LNA noise performance, Microelectronics Journal 33, p. 1027-1031, (2002)

    [7] B. Chi, Z. Yu, B. Shi, Analysis and Design of CMOS RF Integrated Circuits, Tsinghua Press,

    2006

    [8] Massoud, Y.; Nieuwoudt, A.; Ragheb, T., Variability-Aware Synthesis for Wideband Low

    Noise Amplifiers, ISCAS 2007, IEEE, p.3219-3222

    [9] Design Considerations And Performance Requirements For High Speed Driver Amplifiers.

    By: Nils Nazoa, Consultant Engineer (LA Techniques Ltd)

    [10] Sunny Gyamlani, Sameena Zafar, Jigisa Sureja, Jigar Chaudhari, Comparative Study of

    various LNA topologiesUsed for CMOS LNA Design,

    [11] F. Bruccoleri, et al., Noise cancelling in wideband CMOS LNAs, IEEE ISSCC Dig. Tech.

    Papers, pp. 406-407, 2002.

    [12] C. Kim, M. Kang, P. T. Anh, H. Kim, and S. Lee, An ultra-wideband CMOS low noise

    amplifier for 3-5 GHz UWB system, IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, Vol.40, No. 2, Feb.

    2005.

  • [13] C. Garuda, X. Cui, P.-C. Lin, S. J. Doo, P. Zhang, and M. Ismail, A 3-5 GHz Fully Differential

    CMOS LNA with Dual-gain Mode for Wireless UWB Applications, 48th Midwest Symposium on

    Circuits and Systems, Aug. 2005

    [14] F. Bruccoleri, et al., Generating All Two-MOS-Transistor Amplifiers leads to new wide-

    band LNAs, IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. 36, pp. 1032-1040, July 2001.

    [15] J. Janssens, et al., A 10-mW Inductorless, Broadband CMOS Low Noise Amplifier for

    900MHz Wireless Communications, Proc. of IEEE CICC, pp. 75-78, May 1998.

    [16] Adiseno, et al., A 1.8-V Wide-band CMOS LNA for Multiband Multistandard Front-end

    Receiver, Proc. of IEEE ESSCIRC, pp. 141-144,Sept. 2003.

    [17] Stanley B. T. Wang, Ali M. Niknejad, and Robert W. Brodersen, A Sub-mW 960-MHz

    Ultra-Wideband CMOS LNA, Berkeley Wireless Research Center, Dept. of EECS, UC Berkeley,

    Berkeley, CA 94704, USA

    [18] Microelectronic Circuits, by Prof. H. Rashid, pp. 554 580


Recommended