+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation...

Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation...

Date post: 13-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: juniper-booth
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
38
Design of the Wisconsin Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004 27, 2004
Transcript
Page 1: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Design of the Wisconsin County Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Coordinate System: Some

Current IssuesCurrent Issues

Al Vonderohe Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004 SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004

Page 2: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

OutlineOutlineReview: Datums / Map ProjectionsNeed for Wisconsin County Coordinate

Systems (WCCS)Original Design MethodologyCurrent Issues / WLIA Task Force on

Wisconsin Coordinate SystemsMethodology for Possible Re-DesignInitial Results

Page 3: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Ellipsoid

Meridian of Longitude

Prime Meridian

Parallel of Latitude

Page 4: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Rotate about minor

axis to generate

oblate spheroid.

Page 5: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

How do we choose the size and shape of the ellipsoid to use?

Best fit to geoid.

The geoid is a gravitational equipotential surface corresponding to “mean sea level”.

Ellipsoid Used for Current National Geodetic Datum (NAD83) is Named “GRS 80”:– a = 6378137.0 m– b = 6356752.3141403 m

Page 6: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Computational and Computational and Visualization ProblemVisualization Problem

Latitude / Longitude are Angular, not Rectangular Coordinates.

Ellipsoid Surface Cannot be Cut and Laid Flat.

Latitude / Longitude Must be Projected to a “Developable” Surface to Obtain Rectangular Coordinates.

Page 7: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Developable SurfacesDevelopable Surfaces

Page 8: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

One Way to Conceptualize “Projection”One Way to Conceptualize “Projection”

Points on the ellipsoid are projected to the projection surface by straight lines from the center of the ellipsoid.

Note scale factor and how it varies across the projection surface.

“Secant” projection.

Page 9: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Lambert Projections Lambert Projections

Page 10: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Lambert Projections Lambert Projections Scale varies north-south. Good for areas with east-west extents.

Projection Parameters:

0 (longitude of central meridian)

Central Meridian (0)

1, 2 (latitudes of standard parallels)

1

2

0, X0,Y0 (latitude, false easting, false northing of the coordinate origin)

X

Y

0XoYo

Alternative to 1, 2 is 0,k0

(latitude and scale factor at central parallel).

Page 11: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Lambert Projections Lambert Projections Scale varies north-south. Good for areas with east-west extents.

Projection Parameters:

0 (longitude of central meridian)

Central Meridian (0)

1, 2 (latitudes of standard parallels)

0, X0,Y0 (latitude, false easting, false northing of the coordinate origin)

X

Y

0XoYo

Alternative to 1, 2 is 0,k0

(latitude and scale factor at central parallel).

0 k0

0,k0 can be computed from 1, 2 .

Page 12: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Transverse Mercator Projections Transverse Mercator Projections

Page 13: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Transverse Mercator Projections Transverse Mercator Projections Scale varies east-west. Good for areas with north-south extents.

Projection Parameters:

0 (longitude of central meridian)

k0 (scale factor along central meridian)

0, X0,Y0 (latitude, false easting, false northing of the coordinate origin)

X

Y

0XoYo

0,k0

Page 14: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Design of Map ProjectionsDesign of Map Projections Design means choosing the projection

parameters so that the projection meets specific objectives across specific geographic extents.

The design objective is often having the scale factor fall within specific bounds.

For example, the State Plane Coordinate System was designed so that the scale factor is no larger than 1:10,000 anywhere within a zone.

Page 15: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

State Plane Coordinate Zones

North

Central

South

Page 16: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

What is This Scale Factor?What is This Scale Factor? It is the ratio of distances on the map

projection surface to distances on the ellipsoid surface.

It is not the ratio of distances on the map projection to distances on the ground.

To convert ground distances to map projection distances an additional factor must be taken into account.

Page 17: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Scale Transforms Ellipsoid Distances Scale Transforms Ellipsoid Distances to Map Projection Distancesto Map Projection Distances

We know this can be done, but how do we get ellipsoid distances in the first place?

Page 18: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

How Do We Get Ellipsoid Distances How Do We Get Ellipsoid Distances in the First Place?in the First Place?

R / (R + N + H) is called the “ellipsoid factor”.

We then have to multiply S by the scale factor to get a map projection distance (M).

So

M = D * (ellipsoid factor)* (scale factor).

Both ellipsoid and scale factors vary with position.

Page 19: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

There are actually four surfaces!

Map Projection Surface

Distances on property maps and construction stakeout are measured here.

GIS Spatial databases and design drawings are developed here.

Page 20: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Wisconsin County CoordinatesWisconsin County Coordinates

Property maps have tens of thousands of ground-level distances on them. – Too difficult to convert to existing map projections

for GIS spatial database development.

Design drawings have tens of thousands of map projection distances on them.– Too difficult to convert to ground distances for

construction stakeout.

Page 21: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Wisconsin County CoordinatesWisconsin County Coordinates

Solution: Develop map projections that are even more localized than state plane coordinate projections.– There should be no significant differences

between ground distances and map projection distances, so that ground distances can be used directly in spatial databases and design distances can be used directly for stakeout.

– How?

Page 22: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

The ellipsoid was enlarged to the mean elevation of the terrain for the local area.– alocal = aGRS80 + (N + h)local

– blocal = bGRS80 + (N + h)local

Ellipsoid factor = 1. Projection parameters

chosen so that scale factor is– 1:50,000 in urban areas.– 1:30,000 in rural areas.

Differences between ground and map projection distances are negligible in local area.

Enlarged Local Ellipsoid Surface

Local Map Projection Surface (Secant)

Page 23: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Wisconsin County Coordinate Wisconsin County Coordinate SystemsSystems

Design funded by WisDOT59 separate map projections (Lambert

and Transverse Mercator) and coordinate systems for the state.

72 counties – some have shared projections.

Page 24: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Wisconsin County Wisconsin County Coordinate SystemsCoordinate Systems

Page 25: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Wisconsin County Coordinate Wisconsin County Coordinate SystemsSystems

Many counties are using these systems in development of their GIS spatial databases.– Some have officially adopted them through

ordinances.WisDOT uses the systems for all

infrastructure design and construction.

Page 26: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Emerging IssueEmerging Issue

Enlarging the ellipsoid has the mathematical effect of modifying the underlying geodetic datum.

This has caused difficulties in both the vendor and user communities.– Vendors want to support WCCS, but there

is complexity.– Most of the user community doesn’t have a

clue about datums and map projections.

Page 27: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

WLIA Task ForceWLIA Task Force The WLIA Task Force on Wisconsin Coordinate

Systems was formed early this year to address this and other issues associated with location referencing in Wisconsin.

A question that emerged: Can the WCCS be re-designed so that:

1. There is no need to change the ellipsoid from GRS 80. That is, there will be one datum for all projections.

2. Coordinate differences between the existing and re-designed systems will be within negligible bounds. In this way, legacy databases and records will not have to be modified.

Page 28: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Leave the ellipsoid where it is and enlarge only the map projection surface.

This way, the ellipsoid factor and the scale factor are nearly inverses of one another and their product = 1.

Map Projection Surface

Page 29: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Approach to Lambert Re-DesignApproach to Lambert Re-Design

Two strategies:1. Make the original and re-designed map

projection surfaces be identical in three-dimensional space.

– This will cause the latitude of the central parallel (0) to change.

– Challenge: Finding 0.

2. Hold 0 constant.– This will cause the original and re-designed map

projection surfaces to be dissimilar.– Challenge: Finding k0.

Page 30: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Approach to Strategy 1Approach to Strategy 1

Work in geocentric coordinates (3D rectangular).

Use analytical geometry. Find equations of the line that is the

projection of the central meridian. Find the point of tangency between GRS

80 ellipsoid and a line parallel with the above line.

Convert X,Y,Z of this point to ,,h. is the latitude of the central parallel.

Page 31: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Geocentric / Geodetic CoordinatesGeocentric / Geodetic Coordinates Geocentric coordinates

are based upon a 3D right-handed system with origin at ellipsoid center, XY plane is the equatorial plane, +X axis passes through = 0, +Y axis passes through = 90E.

For any point, there are direct and inverse transformations between X,Y,Z and ,,h.

Page 32: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Approach to Strategy 1Approach to Strategy 1Profile through GRS80, enlarged ellipsoid, and original map projection surface at 0:

GRS 80 Enlarged ellipsoid

Map projection surface

Geodetic coords = 1, 0, 0; Compute X,Y,Z

Geodetic coords = 2, 0, 0; Compute X,Y,Z

Compute equations for this line.

Parallel

Find X,Y,Z of point of tangency. Transform to 0, 0, h.

NOTE: Two sets of geodetic coordinates; one set of geocentric coordinates.

Page 33: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Approach to Strategy 1Approach to Strategy 1To find k0:

GRS 80 Enlarged ellipsoid

Map projection surface

Compute perpendicular distance between these two lines.

D

R

DRk

0

where R is the radius in the meridian of GRS 80 at 0.

Ellipsoid Normal

Minor Axis

R

Page 34: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Approach to Strategy 1Approach to Strategy 1

There will be discrepancies because the two ellipsoids do not have the same shape.

Compute best fit translation in Y (change in false northing) and scale from sets of coordinates of points in both the original and re-designed systems.

– Points should be well-distributed across geographic extent.

Apply these best fits to final re-designed parameters.

Page 35: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Dane County Test of Lambert Dane County Test of Lambert Methodology (Strategy 1)Methodology (Strategy 1)

X = -0.003m;Y = 0.000m

X = +0.003m;Y = +0.001m

X = +0.001m;Y = -0.001m

X = -0.001m;Y = -0.001m

X = +0.002m;Y = 0.000m

Page 36: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Approach to Transverse Mercator Approach to Transverse Mercator Re-DesignRe-Design

Hold all parameters initially constant except k0.

Compute new k0 in manner similar to that for Lambert re-design.

Compute best fits for translation in Y (false northing) and scale.

Apply best fits to final parameters. NOTE: Cannot hold map projection

surface identical because the 2 cylinders have different shapes.

Page 37: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

Lincoln County Test of Transverse Lincoln County Test of Transverse Mercator MethodologyMercator Methodology

X = -0.002m;Y = -0.002m

X = +0.002m;Y = +0.002m

Page 38: Design of the Wisconsin County Coordinate System: Some Current Issues Al Vonderohe SIAC Presentation - October 27, 2004.

ConclusionsConclusions

Under the re-design, all WCCS would have a single, common datum based upon the GRS 80 ellipsoid.

Initial tests indicate that WCCS can be re-designed to within 5mm or better.

The WLIA Task Force has deemed 5mm to be a negligible difference.

The WLIA Task Force is recommending re-design.


Recommended