McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-1
Designing Pay Levels, Mix, and Pay Structures
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-2
How to Use Local Salary Survey DataA Presentation to HRACC
April 10, 2012
Rebecca Ellis, Ph.D.Professor of HRM at Cal Poly
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-3
•Uses of Salary Survey Data
•Interpreting HRACC Survey Data
•How You Can Help
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-4
Uses of survey datato help develop pay structuresprice jobs adjust structures over timeadvise on salary offersforecast wage movementformulate performance pay matricesprepare salary budgetssupport labor contract negotiationsperform other work requiring sound information on competitive pay.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-5Building a Market-Based Pay Structure
Gather the background information needed for project success.
Determine your sources of external market data and get the data ready.
Conduct the market data analysis. Develop pay structures. Calculate the costs of the pay structures.
Implement and evaluate the new pay structures.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-6Determining ExternallyCompetitive Pay Levels and
StructuresExternal competitiveness: Pay relationships among organizations
Set Policy Select market
Design survey
Draw policy lines
Merge internal & external pressures
Competitive pay levels, mix, and structures
Some Major Decisions in Pay Level Determination Determine pay-level policy. Define purpose of survey. Specify relevant labor market. Design and conduct survey. Interpret and apply results. Design grades and ranges or bands.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-7What Is the Purpose of a Salary Survey?
A systematic process of collecting and making judgments about compensation paid by other employers
Provides data for:
Setting the pay policy relative to competition
Translating that policy into pay levels and structures
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-8Why Conduct a Salary Survey?
Adjust pay level – How much to pay?
Adjust pay mix – What forms?
Adjust your existing pay structure-update percentage to use?
Analyze special situations- e.g. hard-to- hire; ‘hot jobs’
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-9 Select Relevant Market Competitors
Relevant labor market includes employers who compete For same occupations or skillsFor employees in same geographic areaWith same products or services
ExampleExhibit 1: Relevant Labor Markets by
Geographic and Employee Groups
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-10Exhibit 1: Relevant Labor Markets by Geographic and Employee
GroupsGeographic
ScopeProduction Office and
ClericalTechnicians Scientists &
EngineersManagerial
ProfessionalExecutive
Local: Within relatively small areas such as cities or MSAs
Most likely Most likely Most likely
Regional: Within a particular area of the state or several states
Only if in short supply or critical
Only if in short supply or critical
Most likely Likely Most likely
National: Across the country
Most likely Most likely Most likely
International: Across several countries
Only for critical skills or those in very short supply
Only for critical skills or those in very short supply
Sometimes
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-11Interpret Survey Results (1 of 2)
No single best approachVerify data
Check accuracy of job matchesCheck for anomalies
Does any one company dominate? (Cal Poly)Do all employers show similar patterns?
(industry differences)Outliers?
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-12Interpret Survey Results (2 of 2)
Statistical analysis Measures of central tendency
Average/Mean Median Weighted mean
Measures of variation Median = 50th %ile
Updating/aging survey data Choices for Updating Salary Data include the quarterly
Employment Cost Index (ECI) of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and the annual Salary Budget Survey of WorldatWork. Some employers use the CPI, particularly in labor negotiations.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-13
Help Desk Support
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-14
H.R. Assistant
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-15
Web Salary Data
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-16Why ‘age’ survey data?
Salary surveys capture salary data at a specific point in time in the past. But, the market continues to move because of pay increases, market adjustments, promotions and employee job switches.
Therefore, it is necessary to “age” or “trend” the data to a common point in time—e.g., today’s date, the date the pay plan will go live, the beginning of a new fiscal year, etc.—using a factor that reflects market movements.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-17
Four Simple Steps to Aging1. Determine the starting date for the new pay structure.
2. Determine wage movement percentages over the relevant time period (from survey current date to pay plan starting date)
3. Determine the aging factor4. Apply the aging factor to bring data up to date as of the beginning of your plan year.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-18
Actual 2010 Actual 2011 Projected 2012
Mean Median Mean Median Mean Median
WorldatWork’s 2012 survey projects: WorldatWork Pay Increase Survey
Actual 2010
Actual 2011
Projected 2012
Mean Median Mean Median Mean MedianGeneral Increase/
COLA
1.4% 1.0% 1.5% 1.9% 1.7% 2.0%
Merit 2.3 2.5 2.6 3.0 2.8 3.0Other 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.5 0.9 0.5Total 2.5 2.7 2.8 3.0 2.9 3.0
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-19
Construct a Market Pay Line
Definition of market pay lineLinks a company’s benchmark jobs on
horizontal axis (internal structure) with market rates paid by competitors (market survey) on vertical axis
Approaches to constructing a market pay lineFreehand approachRegression analysis
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-20
Understanding Regression
Job Evaluation Points20 40 60
Surv
ey:
Sala
ry ($
000)
2
0 80 120100 160140 180
86
1210
14
4
16
Tech A Sr Tech Eng 1 Eng 3 Eng 5 Mgr 1 Mgr 3
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-21Combine Internal Structureand External Market Rates
Two parts of the total pay model have mergedInternally aligned structure - Horizontal axisExternal competitive data - Vertical axis
Two aspects of pay structurePay-policy linePay ranges
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-22Balancing Internal and External Pressures: Adjusting the Pay
Structure
Internal Pressures External Pressures
Job Structure Pay Structure
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-23
AB CDEF
Exte
rnal
Com
petit
iven
ess:
Sala
ries p
aid
by c
ompe
titor
s
Pay Policy Line30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
55,000
GHIJK LMN OPInternal Structure: JE Points
Develop Pay Grades
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-24From Policy to Practice:Pay Policy Line
Approaches to translate external competitive policy into practiceChoice of measure
50th percentile for base pay75th percentile for total compensation
UpdatingPolicy line as percent of market line
Specify a percent above or below market line an employer intends to match
Other optionsPay among the leadersLead for some job families and lag for others
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-25Implementing Pay Level Policy
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-26From Policy to Practice:Grades and Ranges
Why bother with grades and ranges?Offer flexibility to deal with pressures from
external markets and differences among firms
Develop gradesEstablish range midpoints, minimums, and maximums
Examine grade overlap
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-27Why Bother with Grades and Ranges?
External pressuresDifferences in quality (KSAs) among
individuals in external marketDifferences in productivity or value of quality
variationsDifferences in mix of pay forms of competitors
Internal pressuresRecognize individual performance differences
with payMeet employees’ expectations that their pay
will increase over timeEncourage employees to remain with
organization
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-28
Develop GradesGrades group job evaluation data on horizontal axisAll jobs considered substantially equal for
pay purposes placed in same gradeEach pay grade has its own pay range and all
jobs in a single grade have same pay rangeEnhances ability to move people among jobs
within a grade with no change in payHow many pay grades?
Number of jobsOrganization hierarchyReporting relationships
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-29Establish Range Midpoints,Minimums, and Maximums
Ranges group salary data on vertical axisEstablish upper and lower pay limits for all
jobs in each gradeMidpoints correspond to competitive pay policyPoint where pay-policy line crosses center of
each gradeOften represents base pay for a seasoned
employee
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-30
Exhibit 2: Range Midpoint,Minimum, and Maximum
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-31Establish Range Midpoints,Minimums, and Maximums
Size of range based on judgment about how ranges support Career paths Promotions Other organization systems
Typical range spread Top-level management positions – 30 to 60% above
and below midpoint Entry to midlevel professional and managerial
positions – 15 to 30% above and below midpoint Office and production positions – 5 to 15% above
and below midpoint
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-32
Exhibit 3: Range Overlap
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-33
Market PricingApproach
Sets pay structures almost exclusively by relying on external market rates
Emphasizes external competitiveness (market-based factors) and de-emphasizes internal alignment
IssuesValidity of market dataUse of competitors’ pay decisions as primary
determinant of pay structureLack of value added via internal alignmentDifficult-to-imitate aspects of pay structure are
deemphasizedFairness
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-34
Sample Merit Grid
Position in Range
Performance Level
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 3 Zone 4
4 6-8% 4-6% 2-4% 1-3%
3 4-6% 2‐4% 1‐3% 0
2 2-4% 0 0 0
1 0 0 0 0
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
8-35
Attraction Drivers Gen Y Gen X Boomers
Career Advancement 1 2 8
Competitive Base 2 1 1Learning/Development 3 6Challenging Work 4 3 2Convenient Location 5 4 3Reputation as Good Employer 6 7 4
Flexible Schedule 7 5 5PTO 8 10Competitive Benefits 9 9Reasonable Workload 10Organization’s Financial Health 8
Competitive Retirement 10