+ All Categories
Home > Documents > DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though...

DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though...

Date post: 08-Jul-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
16
DesignOps CWDS place image here DesignOps Sprint Review Sprint 9.2 Sept 6 - Sept 20
Transcript
Page 1: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

DesignOpsCWDS

place image here

DesignOps Sprint ReviewSprint 9.2 Sept 6 - Sept 20

Page 2: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

Research

● CANS 1.0 User Feedback

● Accessibility Update

Design System

Component Library

Sprint Activity

DesignOps Sprint Review 2

Page 3: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

Research

Page 4: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

place image here● Synthesis of Feedback and Findings under final review● Some interesting insights:

• MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality

• Participants were able to complete the 4 key user tasks

• Informed by our other findings, CANS team was able to make some fast, “low-hanging fruit” usability improvements for 1.0.

4DesignOps Sprint Review

CANS 1.0 User Feedback (WIP)

Page 5: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

place image here

● Accessibility Policy has been reviewed by Policy● Focus on CANS accessibility compliance

- Worked directly with devs to resolve multiple issues captured in JIRA

- CANS has passed minimum automated testing requirements set forth for this phase

- Manual testing to resume code complete● Color contrast issues persist across digital services.

Collaboration with DesignOps is needed to fully resolve this issue

What’s Next● Audit CWDS website for accessibility so Accessibility

Policy can be linked● Revisit Intake accessibility

5DesignOps Sprint Review

Accessibility Update

Page 6: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

Design System

Page 7: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

place image here

What’s Next? (from last time)

● DNS● Components

○ Form Elements○ MultiContext Card

● Add Technical Resources

$ diff sprint todo’s

- DNS+ ESM imports+ DS Site Updates+ README, CHANGELOG

Components- Form Elements MultiScope Card+ DataGrid Pagination+ Loading, NoData+ Card[loading]+ JumpToTop

- Add Technical Resources+ Designers & MDX

Page 8: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

Library Status Tracking

Changelog

---------

WE NOW HAVE A CHANGELOG

$ lerna ls

@cwds/components v0.2.0-alpha.18

@cwds/core v0.1.0

@cwds/validation v0.0.1

design.cwds.io v0.1.0 (private)

rails_app v0.1.0 (private)

Page 9: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

Progress

Page 10: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

DataGrids, Card[*variants], and Form Elements

GA-ready components & resolved patterns:

✔ DataGrids

W Card[*variants]

✘ FormElements

Page 11: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

DataGrids

DataGrid[basic]

DataGrid[simple-search]

DataGrid[advanced-search] (WiP)

Pagination = (...CARES) => {...}

Loading, NoData

Page 12: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

Card[*variants]

Loading

MultiScope (WiP)

https://5ba412a9b13fb13e94c19ab0--distracted-dijkstra-a44525.netlify.com/components/cards

Page 13: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

Component Docs & GitHub Improvements

README

CHANGELOG

Design System Guide Site > Component Library

Page 14: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

<Demo />

Page 15: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

place image here

What’s Next?

● Netlify SaaS & DNS● Components

○ Form Elements○ A la carte Layout

(style encapsulation)○ Rolodex/ Collapsible Cards

● Improve Doc Coverage(Design Resources)

Page 16: DesignOps Sprint Review - Amazon Web Services · • MVP user feedback was largely positive, though all participants wanted more functionality • Participants were able to complete

Questions?


Recommended