+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Det. Supt. Charlie McMurdie. Why?? MPA scrutiny into MPS e-crime capability 2006/7 Primary finding...

Det. Supt. Charlie McMurdie. Why?? MPA scrutiny into MPS e-crime capability 2006/7 Primary finding...

Date post: 19-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 217 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
8
Det. Supt. Charlie McMurdie
Transcript
Page 1: Det. Supt. Charlie McMurdie. Why?? MPA scrutiny into MPS e-crime capability 2006/7 Primary finding was a lack of oversight and co-ordination across silos.

Det. Supt. Charlie McMurdie

Page 2: Det. Supt. Charlie McMurdie. Why?? MPA scrutiny into MPS e-crime capability 2006/7 Primary finding was a lack of oversight and co-ordination across silos.

Why??

• MPA scrutiny into MPS e-crime capability 2006/7

• Primary finding was a lack of oversight and

co-ordination across silos of expertise within the MPS

• E-crime awareness across all staff was poor.

• A capability gap exists in the high-level investigation and

prosecution of major cyber attacks.

These findings mirrored the position across all ACPO Forces

Page 3: Det. Supt. Charlie McMurdie. Why?? MPA scrutiny into MPS e-crime capability 2006/7 Primary finding was a lack of oversight and co-ordination across silos.

• A scoping exercise into e-crime capability within each of the 43

police forces and then collectively across Forces.

• A ‘mapping’ exercise of the e-crime capability existing across

other UK law-enforcement agencies.

• A ‘mapping’ exercise to identify what government, private and

charitable e-crime organisations exist and their functions.

• A series of stakeholder engagement events to identify the e-crime

needs of industry, academia and ‘civil society’.

Evidencing the Gap

Page 4: Det. Supt. Charlie McMurdie. Why?? MPA scrutiny into MPS e-crime capability 2006/7 Primary finding was a lack of oversight and co-ordination across silos.

Delivering the PCeU

Stage 1

• Obtain agreement across the police service

Stage 2

• Obtain agreement across other stakeholders

Stage 3

• Obtain the funding

Stage 4

• Deliver !!

Page 5: Det. Supt. Charlie McMurdie. Why?? MPA scrutiny into MPS e-crime capability 2006/7 Primary finding was a lack of oversight and co-ordination across silos.

UK Law Enforcement & Partnership Agencies

Home Office

ACPO43

Police Forces

PCeU PoliceACPO LeadICF Chair

Interpol RepresentativeFraud Alert Unit

Kidnap/ Blackmail TraffickingPaedophilia

Extreme pornographyHate Crime

Counter terrorismHackers/MalwareBotNet Taskforce

SOCA

Other UK and foreign LEA’s

Business, industry and other partners

Partnership Development Unit Research & Development Unit

Intelligence Unit

Co-ordination Unit

Prevention Unit

CIRT Functions

Joint Intelligence Sharing Protocols to be established

with Industry

SPOC for Internet Crime Forum and National e-crime strategic group.

Identify Funding opportunities for UK & International E-Crime

Initiatives

Joint Police and Private sector Operations

MOUs with external agencies re data sharing,

tasking & operational terms of engagement

National & International interface with

Interpol/Europol

Identify Key Stakeholders and create structured Forums re Intelligence

Sharing

Centre of Excellence for Law enforcement e-crime

Research & Development

National Forensic Best Practise Lead

Research & Testing of Technical Developments (Hardware & Software)

Tactical & Technical Support Services

Minimum Standards for Ops and Tasking

NSAC/CERT/WARP Liaison

Harvest Strategic/Tactical Intelligence. Ongoing

Intelligence Feed

Revising Protocols & establishing Systems for Intel

Dissemination

Co-ordinate National Strategic Analysis

Fraud Alert Intel coordination

ACPO LiaisonNational Policy

Development (NeSg)

National and International interface with

Interpol/Europol/Cepo l /SOCA

Central Skills Database

Performance Measurement

Direct & Management of law enforcement national

e-crime Strategy

Legal SPOC for advice, co-ordination and best

practice

e-crime Awareness Training

Media – Internal and External

Joint intelligence sharing protocols

Intelligence Development of Intelligence SPOC

Closure of ISP, Platform Numbers, VOIP Accounts

and Phishing Websites

Fraud Advice Website

SPOC with other Fraud/Law enforcement Agencies

Training Library of Prevention Training

Packages

Threat Analysis

To provide a National Investigative response to CNI

matters

Liaison with Industry, NSAC/UNIRAS regarding

attacks, vectors, methodologies and threads

SOCA Capability

Page 6: Det. Supt. Charlie McMurdie. Why?? MPA scrutiny into MPS e-crime capability 2006/7 Primary finding was a lack of oversight and co-ordination across silos.

Banks Re Phishing

Reports

Child AbuseCeOP’s

AnalysisAnalysisIntelligenceIntelligence

DisseminationDisseminationAlertsAlerts

Crime Reporting

NPIA (Training)

PoLCIRT

CPNI(Government)

WARPS

Online InternetAdvice

Law EnforcementIntelligenceSOCA/IC3/Interpol etc

ComputerIncident

Response Teams

Other Websites

Botnet Taskforce

Anti Terrorist

IT IndustryAV / ISP /

Academia / etc

National Fraud Reporting

Centre

Fraud Alert

SECRET

SECRET

Page 7: Det. Supt. Charlie McMurdie. Why?? MPA scrutiny into MPS e-crime capability 2006/7 Primary finding was a lack of oversight and co-ordination across silos.

CC Ian JohnstonBritish Transport Police

Crime Business Area

CC Chris SimsStaffordshire

Forensic Science

DCC Jon MurphyMerseyside

Organised Crime

ACC Nick GarganThames Valley

Intelligence

CC Tim HollisHumberside

Drugs

ACC Susannah FyshNottinghamshire

Firearms

CC Keith BristowWarwickshireViolent Crime

CC Barbara WildingSouth Wales

Acquisitive Crime

ACC Bernard LawsonMerseyside

Standards, Training

DCC Stephen LongWiltshire

Technology

Comm Mike BowronCity of London

Economic Crime

CC Mick CreedonDerbyshire

Asset Recovery

DAC Janet WilliamsMPS

E-crime

Page 8: Det. Supt. Charlie McMurdie. Why?? MPA scrutiny into MPS e-crime capability 2006/7 Primary finding was a lack of oversight and co-ordination across silos.

Det. Supt. Charlie McMurdie

[email protected]


Recommended