DETAILED PROJECT REPORT OF IWMP - …slnaiwmpassam.gov.in/xfiles/Karbi...

1

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT OF IWMP (2010 – 2014)

Micro Watershed : Derajuri Micro Watershed Code No : 3B2C1i IWMP project : Karbi Anglong 23 (Derajuri) IWMP Block : Rongkhang Development Block District : Karbi Anglong

Name of the PIA : Divisional officer, Hamren Soil Conservation Division,Hamren, Karbi Anglong

2

Contents

Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................. 8

CHAPTER 1 ......................................................................................................................................... 9

Introduction and Background ............................................................................................................... 9

INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 9

II). PROFILE OF THE WATERSHED PROJECT: ...................................................................................... 9

Table No.1.1 Project at a Glance ......................................................................................................10

Table No. 1.2 Need and Scope for Watershed Development ................................................................10

Table no.1.3: Watershed information .................................................................................................15

Table No.1.4: Status of other development project in the area .............................................................16

Table No. 1.5: Status of previous watershed programme- ....................................................................16

CHAPTER 2 ........................................................................................................................................17

General Description of Project Area ......................................................................................................17

Table 2.1: Location ..........................................................................................................................19

Details of the types of areas covered under the project .......................................................................21

3

Table no: 2.2 Land Details ................................................................................................................21

Table No. 2.3: Details of the types of areas covered under the project ..................................................21

Table No. 2.4: Details of Agro-climatic condition .................................................................................23

Table No. 2.5 Details of flood and drought in the project area ..............................................................24

Table No. 2.6: Details of soil erosion in the project area ......................................................................24

Table No. 2.7 Details of the Soil pH ...................................................................................................25

Table No.2.7.1 Climatic Condition ......................................................................................................26

Table No.-2.8 Physiographic Features ................................................................................................27

Table No. 2.9 Watershed characteristics .............................................................................................27

CHAPTER – 3 .....................................................................................................................................28

BASE LINE INFORMATION OF WATERSHED ..........................................................................................28

Table No. 3.1: Demographic features: ...............................................................................................28

Table No. 3.2: Livestock details: ........................................................................................................28

Table No.3.3:Socio- economic status: ................................................................................................30

Table No. 3.4: Migration Details: .......................................................................................................31

Table No. 3.5: Details of Community Based Organizations existing in the watershed village: ...................31

Table No. 3.6: Infrastructure Facilities: .............................................................................................33

Table No.3.7 Land use pattern (in Hectares) ......................................................................................35

4

Table No. 3.8: Details of Common Property Resources: .......................................................................36

Table No. 3.9: Agriculture implements: ............................................. Table No. 3.10: Crop Classification 37

Table No. 3.11: Crops & Cropping pattern: .........................................................................................37

Table No. 3.12: Land capability Classification.....................................................................................38

Table No.3.13: Irrigation facilities:....................................................................................................39

Table No. 3.14: Status of water table: ...............................................................................................39

Table No. 3.15: Assessment of drinking water facility*: .......................................................................40

Table No. 3.16: Surface water resources ...........................................................................................41

Table No. 3.17 Ground Water Structures to be repaired. .......................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table No. 3.18: Existing Water Saving Practices: ................................................................................41

Table No. 3.19: Details of existing livelihoods .....................................................................................42

Table No. 3.20: Existing functional assets (Works already completed under different schemes including works undertaken by farmers independently) .....................................................................................43

Table No.3.21 PROBLEM TYPOLOGY OF THE WATERSHED ..................................................................43

CHAPTER – 4 .....................................................................................................................................45

Institutional Building and Project Management ......................................................................................45

Table No. 4.1 Details of SHGs & UGs newly formed under IWMP: .........................................................46

4.2: Details of Watershed Committees (WC) ......................................................................................48

5

Table No 4.3: WDT Particulars: .........................................................................................................49

Table No. 4.4: PIA particulars ..........................................................................................................49

Table No. 4.5 Bank Account Details ...................................................................................................50

Institutional Mechanisms: (Enclose the following documents) ...............................................................50

Documents of Agreements: ..............................................................................................................51

Table No. 4.8 Convergence plan with IWMP: ......................................................................................52

CHAPTER – 5 .....................................................................................................................................54

Management/Action Plan ....................................................................................................................54

Description on methodology of plan adopted ......................................................................................54

5.2 Details of Natural Resource Management Activities ........................................................................57

Table No. 5.2.1 Soil and Moisture Conservation structures ...................................................................57

Table No. 5.2.2 Water Harvesting Structures ......................................................................................61

Table No. 5.2.2 Vegetative Covers .....................................................................................................64

5.3: Structure or Activity Wise Details of Engineering Structure and Vegetative Measures .......................76

Table No.5.3.1 : Engineering structures for Soil Conservation Measures (SMC) ....................................76

5.3.2: Details of engineering structures for Water Harvesting WHS ........... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table No. 5.3.3: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works* ............... Error! Bookmark not defined.

6

Chapter 6 ..........................................................................................................................................80

Capacity Building Plan .........................................................................................................................80

Table No. 6.1 Details of Capacity Building ..........................................................................................81

Chapter 7 ..........................................................................................................................................83

Phasing of Programme and Budgeting .................................................................................................83

Table No. 7.1: Phasing of the action plan ..........................................................................................83

Table No. 7.2 Estimated Benefit Cost Ratio....................................................................................... 106

Chapter 8 ........................................................................................................................................ 107

Consolidation and completion of various works .................................................................................... 107

Table No. 8.1: Consolidation of Action Plan ...................................................................................... 107

CHAPTER – 9 ................................................................................................................................... 109

EXPECTED OUTCOMES ..................................................................................................................... 109

9.1 Describe in detail the “Expected Outcomes” ..................................... Error! Bookmark not defined.

Table No. 9.2: Summarize in the table given below (Quantifiable indicators) ........................................ 111

Table No.9.3: Backward and Forward Linkages ................................................................................ 113

List of Maps to be enclosed along with DPR. ....................................................................................... 116

7

Annexure 1: Five Year Budget Details as approved by CEO SLNA – JSWM and Rural Development Secretary, Jharkhand

Annexure 2: Convergence of IWMP and MNREGA guideline of DoLR, GoI

Annexure 3: Action Plan as recommended by CEO SLNA-JSWM

8

Executive Summary Brief about area

Institutional arrangements

Salient Project activities

Physical target and financial outlays

Treatment area and details

Fact sheet about bench mark indicators and action plan a glance.

9

CHAPTER 1

Introduction and Background

INTRODUCTION Name of the State : Assam

Name of the District :Karbi Anglong

Names of the Blocks : Rongkhang Development Block

Name of the project : Karbi Anglong 23 (Derajuri) IWMP

Financial Year of sanction :

Project duration : From………2010……………………….. to…………2014…………………

Map of the project area showing village boundaries, contours and drainage.

PROFILE OF THE WATERSHED PROJECT:

Derajuri (Karbi Anglong IWMP-23) project is located in Karbi Anglong District of Assam. The project is a cluster of

four micro-watersheds with 3B2C1i2b, 3B2C1i1d, 3B2C1i2a and 3B2C1i1c being their respective codes. The total

project area of the watershed is about 3990.0 ha, of which 3438.79 ha has been identified for treatment under

Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2013-14.

The nearest town is Hamren, which is located at about 35 Km from Derajuri and is connected by Pucca road. The

project area lies in the edges of Hamren town. The watershed includes 13 villages. The villages are Artu Bonglong

Gaon, Derajuri Killing Gaon, Bilandi Gaon, Dera Arlok Gaon, Thongja Gaon, Ingti Basapo Gaon, Dera Nihang Gaon,

Thervecherop Gaon, Chek Artur Gaon, Kabung Gaon, Barman Pangcho Gaon, Harlongsora Gaon and Waham Langso .

Karbi communities are the primary inhabitants of the villages. The livelihood of the people of the project area is

primarily based on rainfed agriculture, animal husbandry, wage labour, goat and pig rearing. The project area falls

10

under the hilly area according to the classification of ………..(DoLR) of Govt of India.. The villages are very poor on

the border of Nagaon and Karbi Anglong district of Assam. The topography of the area is undulating and primarily with

low top hills in the west and steep hills in the south. The basic project information is presented in Table 1.1

Table No.1.1 Project at a Glanc

1 Name of the State Assam 2 Name of the project Karbi Anglong 23 (Derajuri) IWMP 3 Name of the District Karbi Anglong 4 Names of the Blocks Rongkhang Development Block 5 Names of Gram Panchayats Hamren Constituency of Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council,Karbi Anglong 6 Names & Census Code of Villages covered Artu Bonglong

Gaon

Barman Pangcho

Gaon 295490 Derajuri

Killing Gaon 295484 Harlongsora

Gaon 295492

Bilandi Gaon

296818 Waham Langso 295483

Dera Arlok Gaon 285485

Thongja Gaon

Ingti Basapo

Gaon

Dera Nihang

Gaon 295487

Thervecherop

Gaon

Chek Artur

Gaon 295465

Kabung Gaon 295488

7 Four major reasons for selection of watershed

11

8 Name, Address , Phone No and Reg.No.. of the PIA(s)

Divisional officer, Hamren Soil Conservation Division,Hamren, Karbi Anglong

9 Date of approval of Watershed Development Plan by the DPC

10 Area of the Project (ha.) 3990 11 Area proposed to be treated (ha.) 3438.79 12 Financial Year of sanction 13 Project duration From 2011 To 2017 14 Project Cost (Rs. in Lakhs) 515.82 15 Date of Sanction by State authority 16 Date of Release of 1st Installment of Central

Assistance (To be filled by DoLR) 17 Any other, please specify

Table No. 1.2 Need and Scope for Watershed Development Watershed Development Programme is prioritized based on the thirteen parameters namely, Poverty Index, Percentage

of SC/ST, Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area under

rainfed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of degraded land, Productivity Potential of the land,

Continuity of another watershed that has already developed /treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly terrain. The

criteria and weightage for selection of watershed are given in Table 2. Based on these thirteen parameters a composite

ranking was given to Derajuri Watershed project

The total number of BPL families is more than 80 percent of the total households of the village; hence a score of 10 is

allotted. The schedule tribes population in the village is about 100 percent; hence a score of 10 was allotted. Rainfed

agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village due to the fact that ground water is acidic(pH in the range of

…….) and hence unfit for usage. More than 60 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual

wages earned by the labour is less than the minimum wages. Hence a composite rank of 5 and 10 are allotted

12

respectively.

Since the rainfall received is high and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under rainfed.

Drinking water is problematic in the village. Majority of land is degraded due to inherent soil loss and degraded land.

The soil is very permeable and production of crop can be significantly enriched with the provision of timely irrigation.

Derajuri watershed falls in continuity with Karbi ……. Cluster approach was followed taking into consideration four

micro-watersheds covering a total area of 3990 Ha. Thus, a cumulative score of 93.0

is given to the watershed.

The cumulative scores of the project area are calculated as per the criteria and scores mentioned in Table 2 . The actual field data were calculated during baseline survey and participatory rural appraisal (PRA) conducted in the area.

A write up elaborating the weightage table for selection of the watershed. (Weightage for selection of Watershed (as per DoLR’s instructions already issued)

Project Name Project Type

Weightage i ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi xii xiii Total

Karbi Anglong 23 (Derajuri) IWMP

Artu Bonglong Gaon

8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0

Derajuri Killing Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0

Bilandi Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0 Dera Arlok Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0

Thongja Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0 Ingti Basapo Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0

13

Dera Nihang Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0

Thervecherop Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0

Chek Artur Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0

Kabung Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0 Barman Pangcho Gaon

8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0

Harlongsora Gaon 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0

Waham Langso 8.5 9 5 10 3 0 5 7.5 15 10 5 0 15 93.0

*As per PPR

Slno. Criteria Max Score

Ranges and Scores

i Poverty index(%of poor to population)

10 Above 80% (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20% (2.5)

ii % of SC/ST population 10 More than 40% (10) 20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20% (3)

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or higher than minimum wages (0)

iv % of small and marginal farmers

10 More than 80% (10) 50 to 80% (5) Less than 50 (3)

v Ground water status 15 Over exploited (15) Critical (10) Sub critical (5) Safe (0)

vi Moisture index/ DPAP/DDP Block

10 -66.7 & below (10) DDP Block -33.3 to -66.6 (5) DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/DDP Block

vii Area under assured irrigation

15 Less than 10% (15) 10 to 20% (10) 20 to 30% (5) Above 30% (Reject)

14

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5) Partially covered (5) Fully covered (0)

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20% (15) Medium – 10 to 20 % (10)

Low – less than 10 % of TGA (5)

x Productivity potential of the land

10 Lands with low production & where productivity can be significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (10)

Land with moderate production & where productivity can be enhanced with reasonable efforts (5)

Lands with high production & where productivity can be marginally enhanced with reasonable efforts (0)

xi Contiguity to another watershed that has already been developed/treated

10 Contiguous to previously treated watershed & contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project (10)

Contiguity with in the micro watersheds in the project but non contiguous to previously treated watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to previously treated watershed nor contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project (0)

xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)

4 to 6 micro watersheds in cluster (10)


xiii Cluster approach in the hills (More than one contiguous micro- watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in cluster (15)



Total 150 150 90 41 2.5

15

Table no.1.3: Watershed information

Sl no Name of Project Watershed Code Villages to be Treated

Geographical Area(Ha)

Treatable Area(Ha) Approval Year

1

Karbi Anglong 23 (Derajuri) IWMP

3B2C1i2b MWS1

Artu Bonglong Gaon 279 240 2 Derajuri Killing Gaon 265 229 3 Bilandi Gaon 292 252 4

3B2C1i1d MWS2

Dera Arlok Gaon 366 316 5 Thongja Gaon 523 451 6 Ingti Basapo Gaon 230 198 7 Dera Nihang Gaon 345 298 8

3B2C1i2a MWS3

Thervecherop Gaon 264 228 9 Kabung Gaon 198 171

10 Barman Pangcho Gaon

132 115

11 Chek Artur Gaon 66 57 12 3B2C1i1c

MWS4

Harlongsora Gaon 668 576

13 Waham Langso

360 310

Other developmental projects running in the Derajuri village:

The villages proposed to be covered in the project are very backward. Currently, there is no other developmental

projects included under national flagship programmes like Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee

Scheme (MGNREGS), Border Area Development programme (BADP), Nirmal Bharat Abhijan(NBA), Swarnajayanti

Gram Swarojgar Yojana (SGSY), Indira Awas Yojana (IAY).. Backward Region Grant Fund (BRGF). The details are

16

given in Table 1.4

Table No.1.4: Status of other development project in the area Table No.1.4: Status of other development project in the area

S no Name of the programme/scheme

Sponsoring agency

Objectives of the programme/scheme

Year of commencement

Villages covered Estimated number of beneficiaries

No other watershed programme was taken up in the project area

In the proposed project area no watershed development projects were taken up in the past.

Table No. 1.5: Status of previous watershed programme-

S. No

Project name

Year started

Name of villages

No. Of micro watershed

Watershed codes

Area under treatment

Funding source

Nodal agency

PIA

Total cost

Expenditure incurred up to start of IWMP

% financial completion

% physical completion

17

CHAPTER 2

General Description of Project Area Assam State Soil Conservation Department is the State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated Water shed Management

Programme (IWMP) in Assam. The SLNA selects the Project implementing Agency (PIA) by an appropriate mechanism. The PIAs are

responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line departments, autonomous organizations

under state/Central Governments, Government Institutes/ research bodies. The PIA for Derajuri watershed Project is District watershed

development Unit (DWDU), Hamren.

The organization and its objectives:

The District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU, Hamren is a district level watershed agency to oversee the smooth implementation

of watershed projects in the district. The Divisional Officer (DO), Soil Conservation Department is the chairmen of the DWDU. The

DWDU has dedicated and experienced staff comprising one Project Manager (Range Officer, Derajuri Soil Conservation Range), a

technical expert and multidisciplinary team of agriculture expert, community mobilization expert, community mobilization expert and

Data Entry Operator, Civil engineer, MIS coordinator, system analyst, surveyor, and accountant. The objectives of the DWDU, Hamren

are supervision, planning, implementation, documentation and promotion of watershed development projects and related developmental

activities in the district as per guidelines. The DWDU, Hamren also works as a PIA for some IWMP projects.

Programmes/ projects of DWDU, Diphu:

At present 11 IWMP projects have been sanctioned by Government of India for Karbi Angng District. Diphu and Hamren Soil

Conservation Division are the PIAs in the district. The entry point activities of all the eleven IWMP projects have been identified by the

respective PIAs in the district through PRA. Diphu Soil Conservation Division is PIA for 5 projects and Hamren Soil Conservation

Division is the PIA for rest of the two projects.

SWOT analysis of the DWDU:

18

Strength:

1. DWDU is manned by Dedicated and experienced staff

2. DWDU is equipped with a multidisciplinary team

3. Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, Assam University and NGOs for capacity building

and technical guidance.

4. Scientific planning of the watershed projects with the help of M/s Survive NE, Guwahati.

5. District level monitoring, coordination & Co-operation Committee.

Weakness:

1. Inaccessibility with respect to motor able road 2. Disruption of Public Activities due to frequent disturbance in the area.

Opportunities:

1. Possibility of convergence with other development schemes. (MGNREGA, NBA etc.) 2. Better financial provision under IWMP 3. Usage of new ICT tools like GIS, GPS

Threats:

1. Irregularities in fund flow can derail the smooth implementation of the project 2. Lack of contribution and cooperation from local people

19

Table 2.1: Location

Longitude 92°44'30" E to 92°48'30 E Latitude 25°47'30" N to 25°53'0" N State Assam District Karbi Anglong Subdivision Hamren Block Ronghang Development Block Panchayat Hamren Constituency of Karbi Anglong Autonomous Council,Karbi Anglong Villages Artu Bonglong Gaon Chek Artur Gaon

Derajuri Killing Gaon Harlongsora Gaon

Bilandi Gaon Waham Langso Dera Arlok Gaon Thongja Gaon Ingti Basapo Gaon Dera Nihang Gaon Thervecherop Gaon

Kabung Gaon Barman Pangcho Gaon

Approach Road Yes

20

INSERT WATERSHED LOCATION MAP

21

Details of the types of areas covered under the project (Area in Ha.)

Table no: 2.2 Land Details

S. No.

Names of villages

Geographical Area of the village (ha)

Forest Area (ha)

Land under agricultural use (ha)

Rain-fed area (ha)

Irrigated Area

Permanent pastures (ha)

Wasteland Cultivable

(ha) Non-cultivable (ha)

1 Artu Bonglong Gaon 279 13.93 164 11.15 8.36 47.37 0.84

2 Derajuri Killing Gaon 265 13.27 157 10.62 7.96 45.12 0.80

3 Bilandi Gaon 292 14.60 172 11.68 8.76 49.63 0.88 4 Dera Arlok Gaon 366 18.31 216 14.65 10.99 62.26 1.10 5 Thongja Gaon 523 26.16 309 20.93 15.70 88.95 1.57 6 Ingti Basapo Gaon 230 11.51 136 9.21 6.91 39.14 0.69 7 Dera Nihang

Gaon 345 17.27 204 13.81 10.36 58.70 1.04

8 Thervecherop Gaon 264 13.22 156 10.58 7.93 44.95 0.79

9 Kabung Gaon 198 9.92 117 7.93 5.95 33.71 0.59 10 Barman Pangcho

Gaon 132 6.61 78 5.29 3.97 22.47 0.40

11 Chek Artur Gaon 66 3.305 39 2.64 1.98 11.24 0.20 12 Harlongsora Gaon 668 33.41 394 26.73 20.05 113.59 2.00 13 Waham Langso 360 17.99 212 14.39 10.79 61.17 1.08

Table No. 2.3: Details of the types of areas covered under the project 1 2 3

S. No. Name of village

No. of beneficiaries covered

MF SF LF Landless Total

22

1 Artu Bonglong Gaon 2 Derajuri Killing Gaon 3 Bilandi Gaon 4 Dera Arlok Gaon 5 Thongja Gaon 6 Ingti Basapo Gaon 7 Dera Nihang Gaon 8 Thervecherop Gaon 9 Kabung Gaon 10 Barman Pangcho Gaon 11 Chek Artur Gaon 12 Harlongsora Gaon 13 Waham Langso

Soil and topography:

The Derajuri watershed project (LWP) is under Sub tropical to Humic Agro Climatic Zone. The soil is mainly sandy loam and clayey.

The soil is reddish to very dark grayish brown in surface colour. The depth of soil is moderate to deep; about 12 to 115 cm. The

predominant texture of soil is loamy sand and clay. The soil fertility is poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The topography

of the area is moderate ranging from 0-42% slope.

The rainfall is high which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of soil erosion in the watershed area. The average rainfall of this area is

about 655 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity of 120 mm within span of a day. This uneven distribution is leading to

runoff of soil every year to the streams, rivulets and depressed area of the watershed area. The soil type and topography of the project

area are given in Table 2.4

23

Table No. 2.4: Details of Agro-climatic condition 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Sl. No.

Name of the Project

Name of the Agro-climatic zone covers project area

Area in ha

Names of the villages

Major soil types Major crops

a)Type b) Area in ha

a) Name

b) Area in ha

1

Karbi Anglong 23 (Derajuri)

IWMP

Sub Tropical to Humic

279

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Fine,Typic Hapludalf-loamy skeletal,Umbric Dystroc & Fine,Dystric

Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic Hapludalf 240

Paddy 47

2 265 Derajuri Killing Gaon

Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic Hapludalf 229

Paddy 45

3 292

Bilandi Gaon Fine,Typic Hapludalf-loamy skeletal,Umbric Dystroc & Fine,Dystric


Paddy 50

4 366 Dera Arlok Gaon Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic

Hapludalf 316 Paddy

62

5 523

Thongja Gaon Fine,Typic Hapludalf-loamy skeletal,Umbric Dystroc & Fine,Dystric


Paddy 89

6 230

Ingti Basapo Gaon Fine,Typic Hapludalf-loamy skeletal,Umbric Dystroc & Fine,Dystric


Paddy 39

7 345 Dera Nihang Gaon Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic

Hapludalf 298 Paddy

59

8 264 Thervecherop Gaon Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic

Hapludalf 228 Paddy

45

9 198 Chek Artur Gaon Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic

Hapludalf 171 Paddy

34

10 132 Kabung Gaon Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic

Hapludalf 115 Paddy

22

11 66

Barman Pangcho Gaon

Fine,Typic Hapludalf-loamy skeletal,Umbric Dystroc & Fine,Dystric


Paddy 11

12 668 Harlongsora Gaon Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic

Hapludalf 576 Paddy

114

13 360 Waham Langso Fine,Dystric Eutrochrepts-Fine,Mollic

Hapludalf 310 Paddy

61

24

The flood and drough condition of the project area are given in Table 2.5

Table No. 2.5 Details of flood and drought in the project area

1 2 3 4 5

Sl. No. Particulars Villages

Periodicity

Not affected Annual

Any other (please specify)

1 Flood No. of villages 13 Name(s) of villages Artu Bonglong Gaon

Derajuri Killing Gaon Bilandi Gaon Dera Arlok Gaon Thongja Gaon Ingti Basapo Gaon Dera Nihang Gaon Thervecherop Gaon Chek Artur Gaon Kabung Gaon Barman Pangcho Gaon Harlongsora Gaon Waham Langso 2 Drought No. of villages 13

Name(s) of villages Artu Bonglong Gaon Derajuri Killing Gaon Bilandi Gaon Dera Arlok Gaon

25

Thongja Gaon Ingti Basapo Gaon Dera Nihang Gaon Thervecherop Gaon Chek Artur Gaon Kabung Gaon Barman Pangcho Gaon Harlongsora Gaon Waham Langso

The soil Erosion type of the project area indicating run off and average soil loss are given in Table 2.6

Table No. 2.6: Details of soil erosion in the project area

1 2 3 4 5

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha)

Run off Average soil loss (Tonnes/ ha/ year) (mm/ year)

Water erosion a Sheet 1195

785 mm/yr 1.35 Tones/ha/yr b Rill 1040 c Gully 105

Sub-Total 2340 0 0 Wind erosion 0 NA 0 Total 2340 785 mm/yr 1.35 Tones/ha/yr

26

The soil of the project area is acidic The soil ingress type of the project area are given in Table 2.7

Table No. 2.7 Details of the Soil pH

Name of the Villages Sample no Soil Ph Soil Type Artu Bonglong Gaon NA 5.4 NA Derajuri Killing Gaon NA 6.5 NA Bilandi Gaon NA 6.1 NA Dera Arlok Gaon NA 6.2 NA Thongja Gaon NA 5.8 NA Ingti Basapo Gaon NA 6.2 NA Dera Nihang Gaon NA 6.3 NA Thervecherop Gaon NA 5.9 NA Chek Artur Gaon NA 6.9 NA Kabung Gaon NA 6.5 NA Barman Pangcho Gaon NA 5.6 NA Harlongsora Gaon NA 6.2 NA Waham Langso NA 5.9 NA

The climatic condition of the project area depicts highest rainfall of 1950 mm During the period 2008 to 2012 The

overall climatic condition are given in Table 2.7.1

Table No.2.7.1 Climatic Condition

Sl No Year Average Monthly Rain fall(in mm)

Average Annual rainfall(in

mm)preceding 5 years

Temp(0C) Wind Velocity

Open pan evaporation

(mm per day)

Relative Humidity

(RH)

Average Annual run off

(mm/year) Max Min

1 2012 1350 655 37.4 10.5 32 71 33

27

2 2011 1950 685 36.5 11.6 31 69 31 3 2010 1430 690 35.9 11.3 30 68 29 4 2009 1590 655 36.5 10.8 28 73 32 5 2008 1650 590 35.4 9.6 33 38 28

Table No.-2.8 Physiographic Features

Elevation(MSL) Slope Range(%) Order of Watershed Major Stream

Toposequence

(Soil series) Average annual soil loss(Ton / hectare/year)

126 m 0-9% MWS 1 NA 195 m 0-7% MWS 2 NA 121 m 0-8% MWS 3 NA 130 m 0-7% MWS 4 NA

Table No. 2.9 Watershed characteristics Shape index of the watershed

Length of main stream

Drainage density Average slope Watershed relief Perimeter of the watershed

28

CHAPTER – 3

BASE LINE INFORMATION OF WATERSHED Derajuri watershed project has a total of 1553 households with a population of 5540 (as per base-line survey ) out of

which 2778 are male and 2762 female. The sex ratio is 1017 female to 1000 male. There are 388 BPL families. The

average family size is 5. The literacy rate is very low i.e, 19.2 percent; male literacy rate is 26.4 per cent (of total

male population) and female literacy rate is very low i.e; 8.25 percent (of total female population).The major castes

in the village are Karbi and all are Schedule Tribes. Majority of population is involved in agriculture and animal

husbandry.

The demographic information of the project area are depicted in Table 3.1

Table No. 3.1: Demographic features:

1 2 3 4 5 S.No Feature Male Female Total 1 Population 2778 2762 5540 SC 5 4 9 ST 2819 2710 5529 BC 0 0 0 Others 0 0 0 2 Children(0-14

years)

3 Sex Ratio

4 Literacy 1459 1028 2487

Literates 0 Illiterates 0

29

5 Work Force 2143 1611 3754 Agriculture 1896 1169 3065 Industrial/Business 748 286 1034 Service 48 28 76 6 Birth Rate 7 Death Rate

The watershed has 472 cows, 462 buffalos, 1380 goats,1034 poultry and 1090 pigs. Majority of karbi community

depends on goat and pig rearing for their livelihood. Cows and bullocks are of local breed. Lack of rain and surface

water has reduced the fodder and pasture availability for their animals. This leads to heavy migration to other parts

of the state with their herds of goats and sheep. Milk production is so low that there is no dairy cooperative in the

village.

The Livestock details are given in Table 3.2

Table No. 3.2: Livestock details:

1 2 3 S.No Feature No./ quantity)

1 Milch Animals Cows 472 Buffaloes 462 Goat, sheep 1380

2 Draft Animals Ox 0 He Buffalo 0

3 Others

30

Poultry 1034 Piggery 1090

4 Total Milk production from milch animals (ltrs/day) 5 Fodder Availability

Dry (Abundant/Sufficient/ Scarce) Sufficient Green (Abundant/Sufficient/ Scarce) Abundant

6 Fuel wood Availability (Abundant/Sufficient/Scarce) Sufficient

Table No.3.3:Socio- economic status:

1 2 3 4 5 6 S. No Type Total

HHs No. of BPL HHs

Land Holding (Ha) Annual Gross Income (Rs.) Rain fed Irrigated SC ST Others Total SC ST Others SC ST Others

1 Marginal 895 186 2 Small Farmers 413 77 3 Big farmers 168 104 4 Landless 77 21

Total 1553 388

31

Migration Pattern:

People migrate during summer season to different parts of the state like Nagaon, Lanka,Hamren and Diphu as daily

wagers, agricultural labours and construction workers. Lack of fodder availability and grazing land for smaller

ruminant force these people to migrate to other places.

About 17% of population are migrating to other areas in search of livelihood. The details of migration in the project

area are given in Table 3.4

Table No. 3.4: Migration Details:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Sl. No. No. of persons migrating No. of days per

year of migration Major reason(s) for

migrating

Distance of destination of migration from the village (km)

Occupation during

migration

Income from such occupation

(Rs.) M F Total 1 1692 785 2477 150-200 Livelihood option 20-30 km Casual Labours Rs 3500 / month

Table No. 3.5: Details of Community Based Organizations existing in the watershed village:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

S. No.

Type of

Group Total no. of CBOs No. of members

No. of ST in each

category

No. of SC in each

category

No. of Others in

each category

No. of BPL in each

category

Bank linkage

32

With

only Men

With only

Women

With

both

Total M F

Total M F

Total M F

Total M F

Total M F

Total

No. of SHGs

Bank Loan Amount (Rs.)

1 SHG

(i) Landles

s

(ii) MF (iii) SF (iv) LF

Total

2

UGs

11 7 0 18

(i) Landles

s 0 0 0

(ii) MF 9 7 16 (iii) SF 11 9 20 (iv) LF 0 0 0

Total 20

16 36

3 VSS

4 FG/

FC[1]

5 WUA

6 F-SHG-

C

7 F-SHG-

B

8 PG 9 PC

10

Other related Groups (Specif

y)

[1]

33

VSS: Van Suraksha Samiti, FG: Farmer’s Group/ Farmer’s Club, WUA: Water User Association, F-SHG: Federation of SHGs (C: at Cluster, B: at Block), PG: Producer’s Group, PC: Producer’s Cooperative.

Infrastructure facilities:

Derajuri watershed is well connected with Hamren Sub division with pucca roads. The village has electricity

connectivity of the State Government. Nearly 75 percent of households in the village have their personal electric

meters. Derajuri watershed has 13 primary schools. For middle and higher secondary education, the students have to

go to Hamren which is about 35 kilometers away. This also contributed to lower education level of the people. The

village do not have a Primary Health Center for which villagers have to go to Hamren which is 35 Km. away.

The details of village infrastructure in the project area are given in Table 3.6

Table No. 3.6: Infrastructure Facilities:

1 2 3 4 5 S.No Infrastructure type No./Quantity Distance (km) Status

(description) 1 Educational Institutions

Anganwadi 3 Primary School 13 105 Secondary school 1 2.7 Govt. College 0 2.8

34

Vocational Institutions 0 2 Service Institutions

Bank 0 0 Post office 0 0 Primary Health Care Center 0 0 Veterinary Center 0 Markets/ Village Haat 10 1.2

3 No. of bore wells/pump sets (Functional) 4 No. of Milk collection centers

( Union/ Society/ Pvt. Agency/Others) Total Quantity of surplus milk

5 Road Connectivity (to main road by an all-weather road) (Yes/No)

Yes

6 Bus facility (Yes/No) Yes 7 No. of HHs provided electricity 510 8 No. of HHs with access to drinking water 17 9 Access to Agro Industries (Yes/No) No

10 Any other facilities (specify-------------)

Land use pattern:

The net geographical area of Derajuri watershed is about 3990.0 ha of which 26% is forest area. The forest area is

mainly divided into two parts; one part is hilly while other part plain or gentle slope (0 to 3% slope). About 51.8%

of land is under agriculture which is completely rainfed; mainly a kharif crop is taken. About 39% of the total land

is classified under wasteland of which 60 percent is cultivable and rest is uncultivable and hilly. The land use

pattern of the project area are shown in Table 3.7

35

Table No.3.7 Land use pattern (in Hectares)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13*

S. No Village

Geographical Area#

Forest

Area Community Land

Land under Non

Agriculture Use

Permanent

Pastures

Land Under

miscellaneous use

Uncultivated Private land Cultivated area

Net Sow

n Area

Net Area

sown

more

than

once

Gross Cropp

ed Area

Temporary

fallow

Permanent

Fallow

Cultivated

Rainfed

Cultivated

Irrigated

1 Artu Bonglong Gaon 279

13.93 NA NA

8.36 NA NA NA

11.15 NA

47.37 NA

47.37

2 Derajuri Killing Gaon 265

13.27 NA NA

7.96 NA NA NA

10.62 NA

45.12 NA

45.12

3 Bilandi Gaon 292

14.60 NA NA 8.76 NA NA NA 11.68 NA

49.63 NA 49.63

4 Dera Arlok Gaon 366

18.31 NA NA 10.99 NA NA NA 14.65 NA

62.26 NA 62.26

5 Thongja Gaon 523

26.16 NA NA 15.70 NA NA NA 20.93 NA

88.95 NA 88.95

6 Ingti Basapo Gaon 230

11.51 NA NA

6.91 NA NA NA

9.21 NA

39.14 NA

39.14

7 Dera Nihang Gaon 345

17.27 NA NA

10.36 NA NA NA

13.81 NA

58.70 NA

58.70

8 Thervecherop Gaon 264

13.22 NA NA 7.93 NA NA NA 10.58 NA

44.95 NA 44.95

9 Chek Artur Gaon 198 9.92 NA NA 5.95 NA NA NA 7.93 NA

33.71 NA 33.71

36

10

Kabung Gaon 132 6.61 NA NA 3.97 NA NA NA 5.29 NA

22.47 NA 22.47

11

Barman Pangcho Gaon 66

3.305 NA NA

1.98 NA NA NA

2.64 NA

11.24 NA

11.24

12

Harlongsora Gaon 668

33.41 NA NA 20.05 NA NA NA 26.73 NA

113.59 NA 113.59

13

Waham Langso 360

17.99 NA NA 10.79 NA NA NA 14.39 NA

61.17 NA 61.17

#geographical area here is the area covered under the watershed.

* Coloumn 13 is the summation of coloumn 11 & 12.

Table No. 3.8: Details of Common Property Resources:

1 2 3 4

S.No CPR Particulars

Total Area (ha) Area available for treatment (ha) Area owned/ In possession of

Pvt. persons

Govt.

PRI Any other (Pl. Specify)

Pvt. persons

Govt.

PRI Any other (Pl. Specify)

(specify dept.)

(specify deptt.)

Wasteland/ degraded land 16.2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pastures 3.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Orchards 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Village Forest 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Forest 0 16.5 0 0 0 0 0 0 Village Ponds/ Tanks 0 1.7 0 0 0 0 0 0 Community Buildings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Weekly Markets 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Permanent markets 0 0.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Temples/ Places of

worship 0 0.12 0 0 0 0 0 0

Others (Pl. specify) Total 20.0 19.2

37

Table No. 3.9: Agriculture implements: Table No. 3.10: Crop Classification

\

The crop details (area covered, productivity) during monsoon and winter are shown in Table 3.11

Table No. 3.11: Crops & Cropping pattern: Table No. 3.11: Crops & Cropping pattern:

1 2 3 4 5 6 S. No

Season Crop sown

Rain fed Irrigated Total Area (ha)

Production (Ton/yr)

Productivity (Kgs/ha)

Cost of cultivation (Rs. /ha)

Area (ha)

Production (Ton/yr)



Area (ha)

Production (Ton/yr)



1 Kharif Paddy 1891.34

2867.74 21566 1891.

34 2867.7

4 21566 Maize 240.7

16 327.82 19764.7 240.716

327.82 19764.7

1 2 3

S. No Crop classification Area (Ac)

1 Single crop 277

2 Double crop

3 Multiple crop

1 2 3

S. No Implements Nos.

1 Tractor

2 Sprayers-manual/ power

3 Cultivators/Harrows

4 Seed drill

38

2 Rabi Mustard

103.164 16.05 2498 103.1

64 16.05 2498 Cash Crops

137.552 19.40 2118.0 137.5

52 19.40 2118.0

3 Summer

Total 2373 3231.

00 45947.

2 2373 3231.

00 45947.

2

Table No. 3.12: Land capability Classification

1 2 3 4 5 6 Land class

S.No Land type

Total Area

(ha)

Soil Texture*

Based on Depth (cms)-

(mention area in ha)

Based on Slope (%) (mention area in ha)

Erosion

(mention area in ha)

V. Shallow (0.75)

Shallow (7.5-22.5)

Moderate deep (22.5-45.00)

Deep (45.0-90.0)

Very. Deep (>90)

Nearly Level (0-2)

Moderate slope (2-6)

Strong slope (6-15)

Steep (>15)

Water

Wind

Sheet Rill Gully

39

* Soil texture (sandy-clay, clayey, loamy-clay, gravel)

Presently the irrigation facilities are provided through canal & Ponds in the project area. The Irrigation details are

given in Table 3.13

Table No.3.13: Irrigation facilities: Table No.3.13: Irrigation facilities:

1 2 3 4 S.No Type of the Source Nos. Command area (in ha)

1 Ponds 22 44 2 Open wells 0 0 3 Bore wells 0 0 4 Canal irrigation 16 32 5 Natural spring head 0 0

Table No. 3.14: Status of water table:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

S.No Source (open well)** Plot No of the source

Name of the

Owner*

Date of recording

Depth of water table from

ground level (in mts)

Source located at (ridge/middle/valley)

Remarks

40

1

2

3

4

5

6

** Identify at least five representative open wells in the ridge/middle/valley portion. Collect the data at the time of DPR and maintain a register every Quarter

Table No. 3.15: Assessment of drinking water facility*:

Table No. 3.15: Assessment of drinking water facility*: 1 2 3 4 5

S.No Item Units Quantity Source 1 Drinking water requirement Ltrs/day 25400 Tube well 2 Present availability of drinking water Ltrs/day 11500 Tube well 3 No. of drinking water sources available Nos 2235 Tube well

a) Functional Nos b) Need Repairing Nos c) Defunct Nos 4 Short fall if any Ltrs/day 5 No. of families getting drinking water from out side the Micro watershed area Nos 6 Requirement of new drinking water sources (if any) Nos.

* based on the observation from the field * based on the observation from the field

41

Table No. 3.16: Surface water resources

1 2 3 4 5 S.No Type of water resource Nos Area irrigated

(Ha) Storage capacity (Cu.m)

1 Tank 0 NA NA 2 Pond 22 NA 42000 3 Lake 0 NA NA 4 Check dam 0 NA NA 5 Percolation tank 0 NA NA 6 Channel/Canal 0 NA NA 7 Any others (specify--------------)

Table No. 3.17 Ground Water Structures to be repaired.

S.No Type of structure

No. available

No. to be Repaired

No. to be rejuvenated

No. with no interventions

required Total 1 Pond 26 18 44 2 Open Well 12 8 20 3 Tank 3 1 4

Total 41 27 68

Table No. 3.18: Existing Water Saving Practices:

Name of the Major Crop Area (Ha) Under water

saving devices$ Under water conserving agronomic practices#

Any other (Pl. Specify) Total Current water Saving status as

against flood irrigation. (Cu.m)

42

Kharif

Rice Not in practice Not in practice Under rain-fed condition NA Maize Under rain-fed condition NA Mustard Under rain-fed condition NA Cash Crop Under rain-fed condition NA

$: Sprinklers, Drip, PVC Pipe, etc., #: Vermi compost, organic manuring, check basin, alternate furrow, Ridges and furrow & specific practices $: Sprinklers, Drip, PVC Pipe, etc.,

#: Vermi compost, organic manuring, check basin, alternate furrow, Ridges and furrow & specific practices

Livelihood pattern:

The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture. In lean seasons they migrate for daily

wage laborers to Hamren and as agriculture labour to other parts of the state. Another major occupation of the people

is rubber plantation and Charcoal making using the wood of Ademura which they collect from the community and

land or forest.

The details of Livelihood pattern in the project area are given in Table 3.19

Table No. 3.19: Details of existing livelihoods

Table No. 3.19: Details of existing livelihoods 1 2 3 4

S. No. Name of activity No. of beneficiaries Pre-project average

income per HH (Rs.) SC ST Others Total Women 1 Piggery 13 8000

43

2 Goatery 18 5000 3 Poultry 15 5000 4 Weaving 13 5000 5 Bamboo craft 0 0 6 Jaru making 0 0 7 Bee keeping 0 0

Table No. 3.20: Existing functional assets (Works already completed under different schemes including works undertaken by farmers independently)

1 2 3 4 5 6 S.lNo Name of the work Plot

No. Quantity

(No./RMTs) Amount spent (Rs.) Programme

No significant works undertaken

Primary problem of the project

Derajuri village comes under totally rainfed agriculture because of this migration percentage is very high. Soil is very

suitable for fodder crop mainly sorghum but due the scarcity of irrigation water only one crop can be taken throughout

the year. So fodder bank play an important role to solve this problem. Majority of farmers own less than 2.5 ha of land

for food and fodder production but lack of irrigation water has made these lands unproductive. The concept of fodder

bank can overcome the problem of seasonal feed shortage and migration and poor animal performance. It is the milch

44

animal, which is the worst affected during these periods of drought, due to lack of productivity of sufficient fodder and

water. As a result, the poor are forced to let go with their animals in search of fodder and green pastures to other parts of

the state. This eventually this leads to colossal loss of income generating assets, poor demographic profile of village and

low education level of their children.

Even in good years, during the harvesting season, the poor tend to sell their crop residue or fodder to earn cash. At such

time when supply is higher than demand, they are not able to sell fodder at remunerative prices. The same fodder is

bought back by them, mostly at higher prices during the months of scarcity.

To meet the critical needs of fodder, especially for the poor families and protect them from inordinately high prices

during the summer months, fodder banks are proposed to be setup at the village level.

Table No.3.21 PROBLEM TYPOLOGY OF THE WATERSHED 1 2 3 4

S.No Problem area Problem analysis Proposed interventions to overcome problems

1 Soil Conservation (slope, erosion, soil loss, rainfall, productivity, etc)

2 Water conservation (Water budget, Ground water norms, productivity)

3 Crop coverage – {80% of w/s area should be with canopy}

4 Agriculture productivity (crop wise compare with dist. average)

45

5 Livestock productivity (Milk Yield, Meat yield, Eggs, Wool Yield, Kidding etc.)

6 Existing Livelihood activities for Asset less persons

7 Community Based Organizations & Social capital base

8 Capacity Building (participation, training,awareness of watershed community

9 Others (specify)

CHAPTER – 4

Institutional Building and Project Management i) Self Help Group

Self-help groups are motivated, small homogeneous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self-

help group initiatives especially for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally self-help groups include landless and

poor women.

Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women,

which came up with the following observations:

46

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people

d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.

With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area, it was planned to have some capacity

building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood activities which will promote

women empowerment.

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on a long term basis. The

user group collect user suggestions from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits.

It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and having a feeling of ownership with

community spirit.

The details of Self Help Group in the project area are given in Table 4.1

Table No. 4.1 Details of SHGs & UGs newly formed under IWMP: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

Sl. No.

Type of Group

Total no. of CBOs No. of members No. of ST in

each category

No. of SC in each

category

No. of Others in

each category

No. of BPL in each

category

Bank linkage

With only Men

With only

Women

With both Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total M F Total

No. of SHGs

Amount (Rs)

47

1 SHG

(i) Landless

(ii) MF

(iii) SF

(iv) LF

Total

2 UGs

(i) Landless

(ii) MF

(iii) SF

(iv) LF

Total

*Account no. of Watershed Committee, PIA.

ii) Watershed Committee (WC)

Watershed committee (WC) was constituted by the village councils to implement the watershed project with technical

support of WDT in the Village. This committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of

the village selects the chairman of the watershed committee with the secretary who will be a paid factionary. A

watershed committee was formed accordingly in Derajuri watershed. As the watershed is covering ten villages; so,

separate watershed sub-committees were formed in the villages. Capacity building training to the watershed committee

is given by WDT.

48

The watershed committee has key role to play during and after the project implementation period.

The details of Watershed Committee in the project area are given in Table 4.2

4.2: Details of Watershed Committees (WC)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18

Name of

WCs

Date of Registration as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)

No. of members in

WC Designation Name

M/F

SC ST SF MF LF Land-less UG SHG GP Any

other Educl qualifi-cation

Function/s assigned#

Write “Yes” if applicable

President

Secretary

Member

Member

Member

(NOTE- Member wise details of SHGs, UGs & Watershed Committee has to be enclosed as annexures. The details includes the Name, Husband name and Caste)

In column 18 only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned.

A. PNP and PRA B. Planning

C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments

E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation

G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed

49

I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).

Table No 4.3: WDT Particulars: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

S.No

Names of WDT members M/F# Age Qualification /

Experience Description of

professional training Role/ Function*

*In column 7 only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned.

A. PNP and PRA B. Planning

C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments

E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation

G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed

I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).

Table No. 4.4: PIA particulars 1 2 3

S.No Particulars Details of PIA

50

1. Type of organization#

2. Name of organization

3. Designation & Address

4. Telephone

5. Fax

6. E-mail

# In column no. 8.1.6 (1), only the letter assigned to each type, as given below, needs to be typed.

A Line Dept. B Autonomous organization

C Govt. Institute D Research Bodies

E Zila Parishad F Intermediate Panchayat

G Voluntary Organisations H Any other (please specify).

Table No. 4.5 Bank Account Details Name of WC/PIA Name of the

Bank/Place Account No. Name of the

Signatory Address

Institutional Mechanisms: (Enclose the following documents)

4.6.1 Flow Chart of Institutional Arrangement from District to watershed level

51

4.6.2 Fund Flow mechanisms – flow chart,

4.6.3 List of Watershed Records to be maintained

Documents of Agreements: 4.7.1) Watershed Committee Registration certificate

4.7.2 MoU – PIA – DWDU, PIA – WC

4.7.3 Resolution of Gram Sabha ,Aam Sabha, WC approving action plan#

#the resolution should be done village wise and needs to be approved in Gram/Aam Sabha

52

4.8 Project Implementation Project Implementation Strategy including coordination and monitoring of implementation process, DWDU and other coordination mechanism. (Describe in detail ).

Table No. 4.8 Convergence plan with IWMP: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

S. No. Names of Departments

with Schemes converging with IWMP

Name of activity/task/structure proposed under convergence

Period of Support

(Years)

Reference no. of activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Estimated Fund

Proposed Under

Convergence (in Rs.)

Level of decision taken

for convergence

Block/district

(a) Structures

(b) livelihoods

(c) Capacity Building

(d) Any other (pl. specify)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

53

10 Total

54

CHAPTER – 5

Management/Action Plan

Methodology of plan adopted for Preparation of DPR

a) Awareness generation interventions: Mass Meetings and awareness meetings were organized covering each and

every village under the project area by the Project Implementing Agency.

b) Initial Orientation program: Initial orientation on concept of the watershed, concept of integrated watershed management

programme of the government of India importance of peoples participating in planning, execution and social monitoring of the

programme as well in post project maintenance of the project interventions were clarified to the people of the watershed,

Panchayati raj Institution members, village headman and other peoples representatives.

c) Participatory Rural appraisal: Participatory approach provides a new path for planning, implementing and monitoring

and post-withdrawal activities with a complete accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource

mapping, Social mapping and season calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the

villages of the project area in general and watershed in specific. These tools put the villagers in this process the

villagers define their problem and prioritized the activities for selecting interventions.

d) Focused Group Discussions: It is a process by which a homogeneity group comes to a platform to discus their issues

and share their issues and share their counter solution to their issues. It may be farmers’ community, women, landless

people, BPL and others. A structured questionnaire was filled and analyzed for Project planning and Implementations.

e) House Hold Survey: To access the impact of any watershed development programme a detailed baseline survey has to be conducted. This acts as benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development programme. A

55

detailed baseline survey was undertaken which involved household survey, bio-physical survey and village level data collection from door to door survey that includes a detailed structured questionnaire which have been filled by surveyor/enumerator by interacting with the household head in the village. This gave in a details of demographic profile, the literacy percentage, S.T/S.C Population, Number of BPL, Cattle population, availability of amenities in the village like drinking water, education , communication banking and marking facilities, income and expenditure pattern of the village as well as of the project area.

f) Technical Survey: A technical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village/project area. It included the soil typology, well/ponds etc, crops taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used, agricultural implements used and various sources of irrigation in the field problem typology of the project area: based upon which the future interventions were planned in consultation with the stakeholders, watershed committees etc.

g) Formation process –Ugs & Watershed Committee:

1. Watershed Committees are formed as per Common Guidelines for Watershed Development 2008 issued by the Government of India by the project Implementing Agency.

2. Users groups (UGs) were indentified during participatory Rural Exercises, gram sabhas, from amongst the stakeholders of the intervention identified.

h) Secondary data collection:

i)Secondary data on satellite imageries were collected and interpretated in GIS environment.

ii) watersheds, Micro Watersheds were delineated

iii) Slope map/ Contour map were prepared with the help of Topo sheets , SRTM data

iv) Climatic data such as Rainfall, Relative Humidity, Maximum and minimum temperature etc were collected for the period from 1-4-2006 to 31-3-11 from the Indian Meteorological Department Government of India.

v) Ground water level, Quality of ground water, Chemical data on shallow aquifers etc were collected from the Central Ground Board, Government of India.

vi) Comprehensive District Agriculture plan (C-DAP) was collected from the District Agriculture office andwas consulted

vii) soil Maps were collected from the National Bureau of Soil Survey and Land Use Planing (NBSSLUP) Jorhat Regional Centre

56

as well data available with District Agriculture office and zonal Krishi Vigyan Kendra (KVK).

3.Planning Process- Social Economic Survey was conducted in each and every house hold. Detailed Participatory Rural Appraisal exercises were conducted in each village under the project area with the farmers, Watershed Development Team members, Project Implementing Agency, Panchayati Raj Institution member, Public representative and thread bares discussions were held, social mappings were done and problems and resources of the villages were analyzed, recorded the needs and suggestions of the stake holders and accordingly interventions suitable to meet the problem typology were identified.

4. Mapping- Social mapping were done in the PRA exercises. Detailed maps were prepared in GIFS environment on watershed delineation, village boundaries, Land use Land cover maps, Drainage maps, Slope maps, contour maps, Treatment maps etc were prepared GPS locations of identified interventions were marked in maps.

5. Hydro-geological Survey- Hydro geological survey prepared by the central ground water board was consulted.

6. Public- Private partnership- The intervention would be implemented by watershed committee through the users groups. Special attention was given on the weaker section of the society such as land less, women and People below poverty line (BPL)

7. Consolidation & preparation Of DPR document- The Detailed Project Report has been prepared comprising the three phases namely preparatory phase-one year. Work phase three years and the Consolidation phase in one year. Thus the implementation of project would be completed in five years. The year wise phasing of detailed in the chapter of Budgeting and Programme implementation.

8. Approve by Village Level Development Council/ Gram Sabha- Activities proposed by villages/stakeholders during PRA exercises are proposed in the DPR on priority basis and availability of fund.

57

5.2 Details of Natural Resource Management Activities

Table No. 5.2.1 Soil and Moisture Conservation structures 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Sl. No

.

Name of the Activities

(Structures)

MWS

No.

Name of the Hamlet /

Village

Plot Numbers ( including

Name of the local Patch)

Name of Beneficiari

es

Area (in Ha)/

Dimension ( in M/

Sq. M / CuM) of

Structure

Unit Cost*

Total Cost

Contribution **

Total Grant Amount

Year of Implementation

(1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th)

In Rs (Rs in Lakh.)

(Rs in Lakh) ( Rs in Lakh)

1

Land Developme

nt by construction of counter

bund.

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

5.0Ha/

2055.12 rm

127.00

2.61 0.1305 2.4795 2nd, 4th Year

Derajuri Killing Gaon


5.0Ha/ 2055.12

rm 2.61 0.1305 2.4795 2nd, 4th Year

Bilandi Gaon

Bilandi Gaon

9.0 Ha/3771.6

5 rm 4.79 0.2395 4.5505 2nd, 4th Year

MWS 2

Dera Arlok Gaon

Dera Arlok Gaon

6.0 ha/3086.6

1 rm 3.92 0.196 3.724 2nd, 4th, 5th Year

Thongja Gaon

Thongja Gaon

3.0 ha/1543.3

1 rm 1.96 0.098 1.862 2nd, 4th Year

Ingti Basapo Gaon

Ingti Basapo Gaon

2.0 ha/1543.3

1 rm 1.96 0.098 1.862 2nd, 4th, 5th Year

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon

3.2 ha/1716.5

4 rm 2.18 0.109 2.071 2nd, 4th, 5th Year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

3.4 ha/1543.3

1 rm 1.96 0.098 1.862 2nd, 4th, 5th Year

Kabung Gaon

Kabung Gaon

2.7 ha/1543.3

1 rm 1.96 0.098 1.862 2nd, 4th, 5th Year

Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

3.3

ha/1543.31 rm

1.96 0.098 1.862 2nd, 4th, 5th Year

Chek Artur Gaon

Chek Artur Gaon

3.4 ha/1370.1

rm 1.74 0.087 1.653 2nd, 4th Year

58

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

2.9 ha/1165.3

5 rm 1.48 0.074 1.406 2nd, 4th, 5th Year

Waham Langso

Waham Langso

2.6 ha/1196.9

rm 1.52 0.076 1.444 2nd, 4th, 5th Year

Sub Total 14081.7 30.65 1.5325 29.1175

2 Bench Terracing

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

0.3636 ha

165000/ha

0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year



0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Bilandi Gaon

Bilandi Gaon

0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 2

Dera Arlok Gaon

Dera Arlok Gaon

0.97 ha 1.60 0.08 1.52 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Thongja Gaon

Thongja Gaon

0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Ingti Basapo Gaon

Ingti Basapo Gaon

0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon

0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Kabung Gaon

Kabung Gaon

0.291 ha 0.48 0.024 0.456 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Chek Artur Gaon

Chek Artur Gaon

0.291 ha 0.48 0.024 0.456 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

0.291 ha 0.48 0.024 0.456 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Waham Langso

Waham Langso

0.3636 ha 0.60 0.03 0.57 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Sub Total 62 8.44 0.422 8.018

59

3 Nalla Bund

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

24.71 rm

850.00

0.21 0.01065 0.20235 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 2

Dera Arlok Gaon

Dera Arlok Gaon 32.94 rm 0.28 0.0142 0.2698 2nd, 3rd Year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon 32.94 rm 0.28 0.0142 0.2698 2nd, 3rd Year

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon 16.47 rm 0.14 0.0071 0.1349 2nd, 3rd Year

Sub Total 26 0.91 0.04615 0.87685

4 Boulder Pitching

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

0

780/m2

0 0 0



0 0 0 0

Bilandi Gaon

Bilandi Gaon

0 0 0 0

MWS 2

Dera Arlok Gaon

Dera Arlok Gaon

0 0 0 0

Thongja Gaon

Thongja Gaon

0 0 0 0

Ingti Basapo Gaon

Ingti Basapo Gaon

0 0 0 0

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon

0 0 0 0

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

0 0 0 0

Kabung Gaon

Kabung Gaon

0 0 0 0

Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

0 0 0 0

Chek Artur Gaon

Chek Artur Gaon 0 0 0 0

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

0 0 0 0

60

Waham Langso

Waham Langso

319.23 m2 2.49 0.1245 2.3655 3rd, 5th Year

Sub Total 319.23 2.49 0.1245 2.3655

TOTAL of SMC 42.503 2.1252 40.3778

5 *N.B. - As per Govt. specified rate.

**N.B. – 5% 0f total grant.

61

Table No. 5.2.2 Water Harvesting Structures 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Sl. No

.

Name of the

Activities (Structures

)

MWS

No.


Village



Name of Beneficiarie

s

Area (in Ha)/

Dimension ( in

M/ Sq. M / CuM) of Structure

Unit Cost*

Total Cost

Contribution**

Total Grant

Amount



In Rs (Rs in Lakh.) (Rs in Lakh) ( Rs in

Lakh)

1

R.C.C Water

Harvesting Structure

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

12.23 sq m

53700.00

6.567 0.32835 6.23865 3rd Year



8.34 sq m 4.48 0.224 4.256 3rd Year

Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 8.34 sq m 4.48 0.224 4.256 3rd Year

MWS 2

Dera Arlok Gaon

Dera Arlok Gaon

8.34 sq m 4.48 0.224 4.256 3rd Year

Thongja Gaon

Thongja Gaon

8.34 sq m 4.48 0.224 4.256 3rd Year

Ingti Basapo Gaon

Ingti Basapo Gaon

8.34 sq m 4.48 0.224 4.256 3rd Year

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon

3.87 sq m 2.08 0.104 1.976 3rd Year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

8.34 sq m 4.48 0.224 4.256 3rd Year

Kabung Gaon

Kabung Gaon

12.23 sq m 6.567 0.32835 6.23865 3rd Year

Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

8.34 sq m 4.48 0.224 4.256 3rd Year

Chek Artur Gaon

Chek Artur Gaon

8.77 sq m 4.71 0.2355 4.4745 3rd Year

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

9.11 sq m 4.89 0.2445 4.6455 3rd Year

Waham Langso

Waham Langso

9.11 sq m 4.89 0.2445 4.6455 3rd Year

Sub Total 113.7 m2 61.064 3.0532 58.0108

62

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

1215.19 m2

158.00

1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year



1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year

Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 2

Dera Arlok Gaon

Dera Arlok Gaon

1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year

2 Excavated Pond

Thongja Gaon

Thongja Gaon

1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year

Ingti Basapo Gaon

Ingti Basapo Gaon

1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon

1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year

Kabung Gaon

Kabung Gaon

1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year

Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year

Chek Artur Gaon

Chek Artur Gaon

1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year

Waham Langso

Waham Langso

1215.19 m2 1.92 0.096 1.824 3rd, 5th Year

Sub Total 15797.47

m2 24.96 1.248 23.712

3 Brick Channel

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

272 rm

2000.00

5.44 0.272 5.168 4th Year


Derajuri Killing Gaon 272 rm 5.44 0.272 5.168 4th Year

Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 272 rm 5.44 0.272 5.168 4th Year

MWS 2

Dera Arlok Gaon

Dera Arlok Gaon 136 rm 2.72 0.136 2.584 4th Year

63

Thongja Gaon

Thongja Gaon 136 rm 2.72 0.136 2.584 4th Year

Ingti Basapo Gaon

Ingti Basapo Gaon 170 rm 3.4 0.17 3.23 4th,5th Year

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon 170 rm 3.4 0.17 3.23 4th,5th Year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

136 rm 2.72 0.136 2.584 4th Year

Kabung Gaon

Kabung Gaon

170 rm 3.4 0.17 3.23 4th,5th Year

Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

136 rm 2.72 0.136 2.584 4th Year

Chek Artur Gaon

Chek Artur Gaon

102 rm 2.04 0.102 1.938 4th,5th Year

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

807 rm 16.14 0.807 15.333 4th,5th Year

Waham Langso

Waham Langso

930.5 m 18.61 0.9305 17.6795 4th,5th Year

Sub Total 74.19 3.7095 70.4805

TOTAL OF WH STRUCTURE 160.21

4 8.0107 152.2033

*N.B. - As per Govt. specified rate.


64

Table No. 5.2.2.1 Vegetative Covers 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Sl. No.


(Structures)

MWS No.


Village



Name of Beneficiaries

Area (in Ha)/

Dimension ( in M/ Sq. M / CuM)

of Structure

Unit Cost* Total Cost Contribution** Total Grant

Amount Year of

Implementation (1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th)


Lakh)

1 Agro-forestry

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

2.9 ha

120000.00

3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year



2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 2

Dera Arlok Gaon

Dera Arlok Gaon

2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year Ingti Basapo Gaon

Ingti Basapo Gaon

2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon

2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Chek Artur Gaon

Chek Artur Gaon

2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Waham Langso

Waham Langso

2.9 ha 3.48 0.174 3.306 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Sub Total 45.24 2.262 42.978

65

2 Fuel wood

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

2.7 ha

30000.000

0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year



2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year


MWS 2

Dera Arlok Gaon

Dera Arlok Gaon

2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year


Ingti Basapo Gaon

2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon

2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year


Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Chek Artur Gaon

Chek Artur Gaon

2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Waham Langso

Waham Langso

2.7 ha 0.81 0.41 0.41 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

3

Sub Total 39 ha 10.53 5.27 5.27

Pasture Development

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

0.87 ha

37600.00

0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year



0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year


MWS 2

Dera Arlok Gaon

Dera Arlok Gaon 0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year


Ingti Basapo Gaon

0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

66

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon

0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year


Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Chek Artur Gaon

Chek Artur Gaon

0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Waham Langso

Waham Langso

0.87 ha 0.33 0.02 0.31 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Sub Total 4.29 0.21 4.08

4 Turmeric Cultivation

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

0.76 ha

130000.00

0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year



0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year


MWS 2

Dera Arlok Gaon

Dera Arlok Gaon

0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year


Ingti Basapo Gaon

0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon

0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year


Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Chek Artur Gaon

Chek Artur Gaon

0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

67

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Waham Langso

Waham Langso

0.76 ha 0.99 0.05 0.94 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Sub Total 12.67 0.63 12.04

5 Ginger Cultivation

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

0.875 ha

120000.00

1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year



0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year


MWS 2

Dera Arlok Gaon

Dera Arlok Gaon

0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Ingti Basapo Gaon

Ingti Basapo Gaon

0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon

0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Chek Artur Gaon

Chek Artur Gaon

0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

0.875 ha 1.05 0.0525 0.9975 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Waham Langso

Waham Langso 0.875 ha 0.84 0.042 0.798 2nd, 3rd, 5th Year

Sub Total 13.44 0.672 12.768

TOTAL OF VEGETATIVE COVER 86.17

TOTAL OF NRM(56%) 288.887


68


Table No. 5.2.2.2 Livelihood IWMP 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Sl. No.


(Structures) MWS Name of the Hamlet

/ Village

Plot Numbers ( including Name

of the local Patch)


Area (in Ha)/

Dimension ( in M/ Sq. M / CuM)

of Structure

Unit Cost*

Total Cost Contribution**

Total Grant

Amount Year of

Implementation (1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th)


Lakh)

1 Cycle

Repairing Tools

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

0 0 0 0


Derajuri Killing Gaon 1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year

Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year

MWS 2

Dera Arlok Gaon Dera Arlok Gaon

1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year

Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year Ingti Basapo Gaon

Ingti Basapo Gaon

1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon

1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year

Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year

Chek Artur Gaon Chek Artur Gaon

1 nos 0.4 0.02 0.38 3rd Year

69

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

0 0 0 0

Waham Langso Waham Langso

0 0 0 0

Sub Total 10 4 0.2 3.8

2 Carpenter

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

1 nos 0.24 0.012 0.228 3rd Year



2 nos 0.48 0.024 0.456 3rd, 5th Year

Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 1 nos 0.24 0.012 0.228 3rd Year

MWS 2


1 nos 0.24 0.012 0.228 4th Year

Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 1 nos 0.24 0.012 0.228 4th Year

Ingti Basapo Gaon

Ingti Basapo Gaon

2 nos 0.48 0.024 0.456 3rd, 4th Year

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon

0 0 0 0

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

1 nos 0.24 0.012 0.228 4th Year

Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 1 nos 0.24 0.012 0.228 4th Year Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

1 nos 0.24 0.012 0.228 4th Year


0 0 0 0

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

0 0 0 0


0 0 0 0

Sub Total 11 2.64 0.132 2.508

3 Goatery MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

3 unit

0.66 0.033 0.63 3rd, 4th Year



5 unit 1.46 0.073 1.39 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 3 unit 0.66 0.033 0.63 3rd, 4th Year

70

MWS 2


3 unit 25000.00

0.66 0.033 0.63 3rd, 5th Year

Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 4 unit 1 0.050 0.95 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Ingti Basapo Gaon

Ingti Basapo Gaon

5 unit 1.33 0.067 1.26 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon

3 unit 0.66 0.033 0.63 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

4 unit 1 0.050 0.95 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 3 unit 0.66 0.033 0.63 3rd, 4th Year Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

4 unit 1 0.050 0.95 3rd, 4th, 5th Year


3 unit 0.66 0.033 0.63 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

3 unit 0.63 0.032 0.60 3rd, 5th Year


4 unit 0.8 0.040 0.76 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Sub Total 11.18 0.559 10.62

4 Hatchery & Poultry

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

12 nos 1.2 0.06 1.14 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year


Derajuri Killing Gaon 19 nos 1.9 0.095 1.805 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th

Year

Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 12 nos 1.2 0.06 1.14 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

MWS 2



Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 17 nos 2 0.1 1.9 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Ingti Basapo Gaon

Ingti Basapo Gaon


Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon


MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon


71

Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 12 nos 1.2 0.06 1.14 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon




MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon




Sub Total 163 16.6 0.83 15.77

5 Piggery

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

1 nos 1 0.05 0.95 4th Year



0 0 0 0

Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 0 0 0 0

MWS 2


1 nos 1 0.05 0.95 5th Year

Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 0 0 0 0

Ingti Basapo Gaon

Ingti Basapo Gaon

0 0 0 0

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon

0 0 0 0

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

0 0 0 0

Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 0 0 0 0 Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

1 nos 1 0.05 0.95 4th Year


0 0 0 0

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

1 nos 1 0.05 0.95 4th Year


1 nos 1 0.05 0.95 2nd Year

72

Sub Total 5 nos 5 0.25 4.75

6 Weaving

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon

Artu Bonglong Gaon

2 nos 1 0.05 0.95 3rd, 5th Year



2 nos 1 0.05 0.95 3rd, 5th Year

Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon 1 nos 0.5 0.025 0.475 3rd, 5th Year

MWS 2


1 nos 0.5 0.025 0.475 4th year

Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 1 nos 0.5 0.025 0.475 4th year

Ingti Basapo Gaon

Ingti Basapo Gaon

1 nos 0.5 0.025 0.475 4th year

Dera Nihang Gaon

Dera Nihang Gaon

1 nos 0.5 0.025 0.475 4th year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon

Thervecherop Gaon

2 nos 1 0.05 0.95 3rd, 4th Year

Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon 2 nos 1 0.05 0.95 3rd, 4th Year

Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

1 nos 0.5 0.025 0.475 3rd, 4th Year


0 0 0 0 3rd, 4th Year

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon

Harlongsora Gaon

0 0 0 7 3rd, 4th Year


0 0 0.00 0.00 3rd, 4th Year

Sub Total 14 7 0.35 13.65 TOTAL 46.42



73

Table No. 5.2.2.3 (Production System) Karbi Anglong (Derajuri) IWMP

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Sl. No. Name of the

Activities (Structures)

MWS Name of the Hamlet /

Village




Area (in Ha)/

Dimension ( in M/ Sq.

M / CuM) of Structur

e

Unit Cost

Total Cost

Contribution

Total Grant Amou

nt Year of

Implementation (1st/2nd/3rd/4th/

5th) In Rs

(Rs in Lakh.

)

(Rs in Lakh)

( Rs in Lakh)

1

Horticulture Plantation

(Assam Lemon)

MWS 1

Artu Bonglong Gaon Artu Bonglong Gaon

3.86 ha

56000.00

2.16 0.108 2.052

3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Derajuri Killing Gaon Derajuri Killing Gaon

3.86 ha 2.16 0.108 2.052

3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Bilandi Gaon Bilandi Gaon

3.86 ha 2.16 0.108 2.052

3rd, 4th, 5th Year

MWS 2


4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon

4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Ingti Basapo Gaon Ingti Basapo Gaon

4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

74

Dera Nihang Gaon Dera Nihang Gaon

4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon Thervecherop Gaon

4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Kabung Gaon Kabung Gaon

4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year


4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

MWS 4

Harlongsora Gaon Harlongsora Gaon

4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year


4.25 ha 2.38 0.119 2.261 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Sub Total 30.28 1.514 28.76

6

2 Pineapple Plantation

MWS 1


1.53 ha

163,000.00

2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year


1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year


1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

MWS 2


1.025 ha 1.67 0.0835 1.5865 2nd, 5th Year

Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon

1.025 ha 1.67 0.0835 1.5865 2nd, 5th Year


1.025 ha 1.67 0.0835 1.5865 2nd, 5th Year


1.025 ha 1.67 0.0835 1.5865 2nd, 5th Year

MWS 3 Thervecherop Gaon Thervecher

op Gaon 1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th

Year

75


1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year


1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

MWS 4


1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year


1.53 ha 2.5 0.125 2.375 3rd, 4th, 5th Year

Sub Total 29.18 1.459 27.721

3 Areca nut Plantation

MWS 1


0.78 ha

40000.00

0.31 0.0155 0.2945 2nd Year


0.78 ha 0.31 0.0155 0.2945 2nd Year


0.78 ha 0.31 0.0155 0.2945 2nd Year

MWS 2


1.55 ha 0.62 0.031 0.589 3rd, 4th Year

Thongja Gaon Thongja Gaon 1.55 ha 0.62 0.031 0.589 3rd, 4th Year


1.55 ha 0.62 0.031 0.589 3rd, 4th Year


1.55 ha 0.62 0.031 0.589 3rd, 4th Year

MWS 3

Thervecherop Gaon Thervecherop Gaon

2.33 ha 0.93 0.0465 0.8835 2nd, 3rd, 4th Year


2.33 ha 0.93 0.0465 0.8835 2nd, 3rd, 4th Year

Barman Pangcho Gaon

Barman Pangcho Gaon

2.33 ha 0.93 0.0465 0.8835 2nd, 3rd, 4th Year

76


2.33 ha 0.93 0.0465 0.8835 2nd, 3rd, 4th Year

MWS 4


0.78 ha 0.31 0.0155 0.2945 2nd Year


0.78 ha 0.31 0.0155 0.2945 2nd Year

Sub Total 7.75 0.3875 7.3625

GRAND TOTAL 51.58

5.3: Structure or Activity Wise Details of Engineering Structure and Vegetative Measures ( Derajuri IWMP)

Table No.5.3.1: Engineering structures for Soil Conservation Measures (SMC) (M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)

1 2 3 4

S. No. Name of structures

Proposed plan

Area (ha) Farmers Total units

(No./ cu.m./ rmt) UNIT COST

(Rs) Estimated cost* (Rs. in lakh)

Farmers contribution (Rs. in lakh)

Grant Portion (Rs. in lakh)

M W O T

A PRIVATE LAND

i Land Development 127.00/m 29.73 0.9195 30.65 1.5325 30.65

ii Bench Terracing 165000.00/ha 8.187 0.2532 8.44 0.422 8.44

iii Nalla Bund 850.00/m 0.8827 0.273 0.91 0.455 0.91

Sub Total A 38.7997 1.4457 40 2.4095 40

B COMMON LAND

Boulder Pitching 780.00/m2 1.494 0.9213 0.0747 2.49 2.49

77

Sub Total B 1.494 0.9213 0.0747 2.49 2.49

Total (A+B) 1.494 39.721 1.5204 42.49 2.4095 42.49

5.3.2: Details of engineering structures for Water Harvesting /WHS M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total

1 2 3 4

S. No. Name of structures

Proposed plan

Total unit (No./cu.m./rmt)

UNIT COST Estimated cost* Farmers

(Rs) (Rs. in lakh) contribution Grant

(Rs) (Rs)

M W O T

A PRIVATE LAND

A1 Individual structures

i. Pond 158.00/m2 24.2112 0.7488 24.96 1.248 24.96 Sub Total (A1) 24.2112 0.7488 24.96 1.248 24.96

A2 Common structures

i. Brick Channel 2000.00/m 44.514 27.4503 2.226 74.19 3.7095 74.19

Subtotal (A2) 44.514 27.4503 2.226 74.19 3.7095 74.19

78

Subtotal (A) 44.514 51.6615 2.9748 99.15 4.9575 99.15

B COMMON LAND

i. R.C.C. Water Harvesting Structure 53700.00/m2 36.6384 22.5934 1.8319 61.064 3.0532 61.064

Sub total (B) 36.6384 22.5934 1.8319 61.064 3.0532 61.064

Total (A+B) 81.1524 74.2549 4.8067 160.214 8.0107 160.214

Table No. 5.3.3: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works* 1 2 3 4

S. No. Name of structure/ work

Proposed plan

Area (ha) No. of plants

Unit Cost

(Rs)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

Farmer Contribution (Rs. in lakh)

Grant (Rs. in lakh)

i Agro Forestry 120000.00/ha 45.24 2.262 45.24

ii Fuel Wood 30000.00/ha 10.53 0.5265 10.53

iii Pature Development 37600.00/ha 4.29 0.2145 4.29

iv Turmeric Cultivation 130000.00/ha 12.67 0.6335 12.67

79

v Ginger Cultivation 120000.00/ha 13.44 0.672 13.44

Total Of Vegetative Covers

86.17 4.3085 86.17

Total Of NRM

Activities

288.874 14.7287 288.874

80

Chapter 6

Capacity Building Plan . Capacity Building:

Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain the

insights, knowledge and experience needed to solve problems and implement change.

There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of development interventions

by going beyond the conventional development targets and measures of success ( e , g . in the form of commodities,

good and service ) to take in to account improvements to human potential, Capacity building of stakeholders is also

increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involve participation of stakeholders at all

levels for effective implementation of projects.

Scope of capacity building at Derajuri village

Alternative land use plan

Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation

Improved and scientific agriculture practices

Fodder development and management

Afforestation

Meteorological Information

Dairy Development and management

Rural Craft

81

Income Generation Activities

Stitching

Food processing

Post harvest management Practices

Table No. 6.1 Details of Capacity Building 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Sl. No.

Name of the Training & Exposure ( Knowledge, Skill, etc. at both Being

and Doing level)

Number of

events

Number of Participants in an event

Total Number of days

per event

Total Traineedays (= 3 x 4 x 5)

Cost per Traineeday

(in Rs)

Total Cost required for

the programme (= 6 x7 ; in

Rs.)

Total Grant

Amount (in Rs)



Monitoring Indicators

SHG/ UG / WC / PI related 1 WC 3 10 4 120 1st/2nd/3rd/4th

2 PI 2 6 2 24 To Be Prepared 3 SHG 5 25 4 500 4 UG 6 25 4 600 5 SHG Exposure Visits 4 30 4 480

Subtotal NRM related

1 Water Harvesting Structure 3 30 3 270 1st/2nd/3rd/4th

2 Soil Moisture Conservation 4 30 3 360 To be

approved by DWDU

3 Vegetative Covers 4 10 3 120 4 Agronomics 3 30 3 270

Subtotal Production Enhancement related

1 Improve Agronomic Practise 5 25 3 375 1st/2nd/3rd/4th

2 Exposure Visit 4 48 4 768 To be

82

3 Plantation Practice 4 20 3 approved by DWDU

Subtotal Livelihoods / Micro-enterprises related 1 Veterinary etc. 6 30 3 540 1st/2nd/3rd/4th 2 Fishery etc. 5 30 3 450 To be

approved by DWDU

3 Vermi compost/ compost pits 4 30 2 240

Subtotal Convergence / Rights & entitlement / Well Being related 1 Convergences 4 20 1 80 1st/2nd/3rd/4th 2 Rights & Entitlement 4 50 2 400 To be

approved by DWDU

3 Sharing & Usufructs 4 50 2 400 4 Wellbeing Related 9 50 1 450

Subtotal For PIA / WDT staffs level 1 PIA 3 10 4 120 To be

approved by DWDU

1st/2nd/3rd/4th

2 WDT 6 6 4 144

Subtotal Others TOT/CRP/CSP/Related 4 6 4 96 1st/2nd/3rd/4th TOT/Others 4 50 3 600

District Level Workshop 8 4 6 192

Training Outside state 9 5 3 135 State Level Workshop

Subtotal GRAND TOTAL 22.80

83

Chapter 7

Phasing of Programme and Budgeting *Please refer to the “Fund Utilization pattern component wise in % under IWMP” letter attached in the Annexure.

Table No. 7.1: Phasing of the action plan

Table 7.1 Phasing of Action Plan- Natural Resource Management Activities, Karbi Anglong (Derajuri) IWMP

( MWS 1.3B2C1i2b)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Sl. No. Name of Village Activity unit

Unit cost 2 nd year 3 rd year 4 th year 5 th year Total

In Rs Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy Fin

(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (No/m3/rm)

(Rs in Lakh)

1 Artu

Bonglong Gaon

Land Development by construction of counter bund.

Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 1373.2

3 m 174400 0 0 2055.12 m 261600

Bench Terracing Ha 165000.

0 0.073

ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145

ha 24000 0.3636 ha 60000

Nalla Bund Rm 850 6.26 m 8875 6.26 m 8875 0 0 1.25

m 8165 5.35 21300

Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

84

R.C.C Water Harvesting Structure

M2 of H/W

53700.00

0 0.00 12.23 656775 0 0 0 0 12.23 656775

Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5

9 96000 1215.18 192000

Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 272 544000 0 0 272 544000

Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0

0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000

Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90

7 27200 2.721 81600

Pasture Development

Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29

8 11200 0.894 33600

Turmeric Cultivation Ha 130000.

00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000

Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000.

00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000

2 Derajuri Killing Gaon


Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 1373.2

3 m 174400 0 0 2055.12 m 261600


0 0.073

ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145

ha 24000 0.3636 60000



M2 of H/W

53700.00

0 0.00 8.348 448275 0 0 0 0 8.348 448275

Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5

9 96000 1215.18 192000

Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 272 544000 0 0 272 544000

Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0

0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000

Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90

7 27200 2.721 81600

Pasture Development

Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29

8 11200 0.894 33600

85


00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000


00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000

3 Bilandi Gaon


Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 1373.2

3 m 174400 1716.54 218000 3771.65

m 479600


0 0.073

ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145

ha 24000 0.3636 60000



M2 of H/W

53700.00

0 0.00 8.348 448275 0 0 0 0 8.348

448275

Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5

9 96000 1215.18 192000

Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 272 544000 0 0 272 544000

Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0

0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000

Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90

7 27200 2.721 81600

Pasture Development

Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29

8 11200 0.894 33600


00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000


00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000

Sub total- 883732.50 2621857.5

0 2155200.00 1287065.

00 6947855.00

86

( MWS 2-3B2C1i1d) 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12

Sl. No. Name of Village Activity GPS


In Rs Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin

(Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs) (Rs)

4 Dera Arlok Gaon


Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 686.6

1 m 87200 1716.

54 218000 3.89.76 m 392400


0 0.073

ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145

ha 24000 0.3636 60000

Nalla Bund Rm 850.00 8.35 7100 8.35 7100 0 0 16.70 14200 33.411 28400 Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


M2 of H/W

53700.00

0 0.00 8.348 448275 0 0 0 0 8.348

448275

Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5

9 96000 1215.18 192000

Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 136 272000 0 0 136 272000

Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0

0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000

Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0

0.907

27200 2.721 81600

Pasture Development

Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29

8 11200 0.894 33600

87


00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000


00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000

5 Thongja Gaon


Rm 127.00 858.27 m

109000.00 0 0 686.6

1 m 87200 0 0 1544.88

m 196200


0 0.073

ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145

ha 24000 0.3636 60000



M2 of H/W

53700.00

0 0.00 8.348 448275 0 0 0 0 8.348

448275

Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5

9 96000 1215.18 192000

Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 136 272000 0 0 136 272000

Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0

0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000

Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90

7 27200 2.721 81600

Pasture Development

Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29

8 11200 0.894 33600


00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000


00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000

6 Ingti

Basapo Gaon


Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 686.6

1 m 87200 171.6

5 m 21800 1544.88 m 196200


0 0.073

ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145

ha 24000 0.3636 60000


88


M2 of H/W

53700.00

0 0.00 8.348 448275 0 0 0 0 8.348

448275

Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5

9 96000 1215.18 192000

Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 136 272000 34 68000 170 340000

Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0

0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000

Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0

0.907

27200 2.721 81600

Pasture Development

Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29

8 11200 0.894 33600


00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000


00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000

7 Dera

Nihang Gaon


Rm 127.00 858.27 m

109000.00 0 0 686.6

1 m 87200 171.6

5 m 21800 1716.54 218000


0 0.073

ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 2 24000 0 0 0.145

ha 24000 0.3636 60000



M2 of H/W

53700.00

0 0.00 3.882 208500 0 0 0 0 3.882 208500

Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5

9 96000 1215.18 192000

Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 136 272000 34 68000 170 340000

Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0

0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000

Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90

7 27200 2.721 81600

Pasture Development

Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29

8 11200 0.894 33600

89


00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000


00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000

Sub total- 1221910.00 2978035.0

0 1436800.00 1823020.

00 7459765.00

(MWS 3 -3B2C1i2a ) 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12



In Rs Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin


8 Thervecherop Gaon


Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 686.6

1 m 87200 171.6

5 m 21800 1544.88 m 196200


0 0.073

ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145

ha 24000 0.3636 60000

Nalla Bund Rm 355.00 4.6 3905 6.47 5502.5 0 0 9.19 7810 18.37 15620 Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


M2 of H/W

53700.00

0 0.00 8.348 448275 0 0 0 0 8.348

448275

Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5

9 96000 1215.18 192000

Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 136 272000 0 0 136 272000

Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0

0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000

Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90

7 27200 2.721 81600

90

Pasture Development

Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29

8 11200 0.894 33600


00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000


00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000

9 Kabung Gaon


Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 686.6

1 m 87200 171.6

5 m 21800 1544.88 m 196200


0 0.073

ha 12000.00 0.073 ha

12000 0 0 0.145 ha 24000 0.291 48000



M2 of H/W

53700.00

0 0.00 12.23 656775 0 0 0 0 12.23 656775

Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5

9 96000 1215.18 192000

Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 136 272000 34 68000 170 340000

Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0

0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000

Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90

7 27200 2.721 81600

Pasture Development

Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29

8 11200 0.894 33600


00 0.152 19800.00 0.152 19800 0 0 0.305 39600 0.609 79200


00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000

10 Barman Pangcho

Gaon


Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 686.6

1 m 87200 171.6

5 m 21800 1544.88 m 196200

91


0 0.073

ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145

ha 24000 0.3636 60000



M2 of H/W

53700.00

0 0.00 8.348 448275 0 0 0 0 8.348

448275

Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5

9 96000 1215.18 192000

Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 136 272000 0 0 136 272000

Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0

0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000

Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90

7 27200 2.721 81600

Pasture Development

Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29

8 11200 0.894 33600


00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000


00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000

11 Chek Artur Gaon


Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 686.6

1 m 87200 0 0 1373.23

m 174400


0 0.073

ha 12000.00 0.073 ha

12000 0 0 0.145 ha 24000 0.291 48000



M2 of H/W

53700.00

0 0.00 8.774 471210 0 0 0 0 8.774 471210

Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5

9 96000 1215.18 192000

Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 68 136000 34 68000 102 204000

Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0

0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000

92

Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90

7 27200 2.721 81600

Pasture Development

Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29

8 11200 0.894 33600


00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000


00 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000

Sub total 1178310.00 3405445.0

0 1300800.00 1626820.

00 7511375.00

(MWS4-3B2C1i1c)

1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12



In Rs Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin


12 Harlongsora Gaon


Rm 127.00 655.12 m 83200 0 0 343.31

m 43600 171.65 m 21800 1170.08

m 148599.7


0 0.073

ha 12000.00 0.073 ha

12000 0 0 0.145 ha 24000 0.291 48000

Nalla Bund Rm 355.00 0.42 355 0.42 355 0 0 0.84 710 1.68 1420 Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


M2 of H/W

53700.00

0 0.00 9.124 489975 0 0 0 0 9.124 489975

Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5

9 96000 1215.18 192000

93

Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 68 136000 816 1632000 884 1768000

Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0

0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000

Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90

7 27200 2.721 81600

Pasture Development

Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0 0.29

8 11200 0.894 33600


00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000

Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000 0.175 21000.00 0.35 42000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.875 105000

13 Waham Langso


Rm 127.00 686.61 m 87200.00 0 0 343.31

m 43600 171.65 m 21800 1201.57

m 152600


0 0.073

ha 12000.00 0.145 ha 24000 0 0 0.145

ha 24000 0.3636 ha 60000

Boulder Pitching M2 780.00 0 0.00 231.46 166500 0 0 106.7

3 83250 320.19 249750


M2 of H/W

53700.00

0 0.00 9.124 489975 0 0 0 0 9.124 489975

Excavated Pond M2 158.00 0 0.00 607.59 96000 0 0 607.5

9 96000 1215.18 192000

Brick Channel Rm 2000.00 0 0.00 0 0 150.28 300560 780.3 1560600 930.58 1861160

Agro-forestry Ha 120000 0.97 116000.0

0 0.97 116000 0 0 0.97 116000 2.91 348000

Fuel wood Ha 30000.00 0.907 27200.00 0.907 27200 0 0 0.90

7 27200 2.721 81600

Pasture Development

Ha 37600.00 0.298 11200.00 0.298 11200 0 0

0.298

11200 0.894 33600


00 0.152 19800.00 0.305 39600 0 0 0.305 39600 0.762 99000

Ginger Cultivation Ha 120000 0.175 21000.00 0.175 21000 0 0 0.35 42000 0.7 84000

94

Sub total:- 585155.00 1825805.0

0 523760.00 4032160.0

0 6966879.70

Total: 3869107.50 10831142.

50 5416560.00 8769065.0

0 28885874.70

( MWS 1.3B2C1i2b) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Sl. No. Name of Village Activity Unit


In Rs Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin


1 Artu

Bonglong Gaon

Cycle Repairing

Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 1 24000 1 24000

Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 0 0 2.666 66670 Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 5 50000 5 50000 0 0 12 120000

Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 100000 0 0 1 100000

Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 1 50000 0 0 0 0 1 50000

Fingerlings to be

Spread upon in existing Fishery.

No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Cycle Repairing

Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000

Carpenter No. 24,000.00 1 24000.00 0 0 0 0 1 24000 2 48000

Goatery unit 25000.00 1.333 33335.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 1.866 46669 5.866 146674

95

Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 5 50000 5 50000 7 70000 19 190000

Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 1 50000 0 0 1 50000 2 100000

Fingerlings to be


No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 Bilandi Gaon

Cycle Repairing

Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000

Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 1 24000 1 24000

Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 0 0 2.666 66670 Hatchery & Poultry No. 10,000.00 2 20000.00 5 50000 5 50000 0 0 12 120000

Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 1 50000 0 0 0 0 1 50000

Fingerlings to be


No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sub total 117335.00 480005.00 350005.00 238669.00 1186014.00

( MWS 2-3B2C1i1d)

1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12



In Rs Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin


96

4 Dera Arlok Gaon

Cycle Repairing

Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000

Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 24000 0 0 1 24000

Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 0 0 1.333 33335 2.666 66670


Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 1 100000 1 100000

Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 50000 0 0 1 50000

Fingerlings to be


No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Thongja Gaon

Cycle Repairing

Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000

Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 24000 0 0 1 24000

Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 1.33

3 33335 3.999 100005


Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 50000 0 0 1 50000

Fingerlings to be


No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

6 Ingti Basapo Gaon

Cycle Repairing

Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000

Carpenter No. 24,000.00 1 24000.00 0 0 1 24000 0 0 2 48000

Goatery unit 25000.00 1.333 33335.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 1.33

3 33335 5.332 133340


97

Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 50000 0 0 1 50000

Fingerlings to be


No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

7 Dera Nihang Gaon

Cycle Repairing

Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000

Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 0 0 1.333 33335 2.666 66670


Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 50000 0 0 1 50000

Fingerlings to be


No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sub total 137335.00 493340.00 438670.00 433340.00 1502685.0

0 (MWS 3 -3B2C1i2a )

1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12



In Rs Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin


8 Thervecherop Gaon

Cycle Repairing

Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000

Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 24000 0 0 1 24000

Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 1.33

3 33335 3.999 100005

98


Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 1 50000 1 50000 0 0 2 100000

Fingerlings to be


No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

9 Kabung Gaon

Cycle Repairing

Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000

Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 24000 0 0 1 24000

Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 0 0 2.666 66670


Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 1 50000 1 50000 0 0 2 100000

Fingerlings to be


No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

10 Barman Pangcho

Gaon

Cycle Repairing

Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000

Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 24000 0 0 1 24000

Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 1.33

3 33335 3.999 100005


Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 100000 0 0 1 100000

Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 50000 0 0 1 50000

99

Fingerlings to be


No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

11 Chek Artur Gaon

Cycle Repairing

Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 1 40000 0 0 0 0 1 40000

Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 0 0 1.333 33335 2.666 66670


Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fingerlings to be


No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Sub Total 80000.00 493340.00 622005.00 250005.00 1445350.00

(MWS4-3B2C1i1c)

1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12



In Rs Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin


12 Harlongsora Gaon

Cycle Repairing

Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 0 0 1.333 33335 2.666 66670


100

Piggery No. 100,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 1 100000 0 0 1 100000

Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fingerlings to be


No. 5 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

13 Waham Langso

Cycle Repairing

Tools No. 40,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Carpenter No. 24,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Goatery unit 25000.00 0 0.00 1.333 33335 1.333 33335 1.33

3 13334 3.999 80004


Piggery No. 100,000.00 1 100000.0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 100000

Weaving No. 50,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Fingerlings to be


No. 5 8400 42000.00 2750 13750 600 3000 2700 13500 14450 72250

Sub Total 182000.00 80420.00 136335.00 110169.00 508924.00

Total 516670.00 1547105.0

0 1547015.00 1032183.0

0 4642973.00

Table 7.1 Phasing of Action Plan- Production System, Karbi Anglong-23 (Derajuri) IWMP

( MWS 1.3B2C1i2b)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10



In Rs Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin


101

1 Artu

Bonglong Gaon

Horticulture

Plantation Ha 56000.00 0 0.00 1.290 72250 1.29

0 72250 1.290 72250 3.870 216750

Pineapple Plantation Ha 163,000.0

0 0 0.00 0.512 83500 0.512 83500 0.51

2 83500 1.536 250500

Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0.775 31000.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.775 31000


Horticulture

Plantation Ha 56000.00 0 0.00 1.290 72250 1.29

0 72250 1.290 72250 3.870 216750


0 0 0.00 0.512 83500 0.512 83500 0.51

2 83500 1.536 250500

Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0.775 31000.00 0 0 0 0 0

0.775 0.775 31000

3 Bilandi Gaon

Horticulture

Plantation Ha 56000.00 0 0.00 1.290 72250 1.29

0 72250 1.290 72250 3.870 216750


0 0 0.00 0.512 83500 0.512 83500 0.51

2 83500 1.536 250500

Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0.775 31000.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.775 31000

Sub total 93000.00 467250.00 467250.00 467250.00 1494750.00

( MWS 2-3B2C1i1d)

1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12

Sl. No. Name of Village Activity unit


In Rs Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin


4 Dera Arlok Gaon

Horticulture

Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.387 21675.00 1.290 72250 1.29

0 72250 1.290 72250 4.257 238425


0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.512 83500 0.512 83500

Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0.77

5 31000 0 0 0.775 31000

5 Thongja Gaon

Horticulture

Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.387 21675.00 1.290 72250 1.29

0 72250 1.290 72250 4.257 238425

102


0 0.512 83500.00 0 0 0 0 0.512 83500 1.024 167000


5 31000 0 0 0.775 31000

6 Ingti Basapo Gaon

Horticulture

Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.387 21675.00 1.290 72250 1.29

0 72250 1.290 72250 4.257 238425


0 0.512 83500.00 0 0 0 0 0.512 83500 1.024 167000

Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0 0.00 0.775 31000 0.77

5 31000 0 0 1.55 62000

7 Dera Nihang Gaon

Horticulture

Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.387 21675.00 1.290 72250 1.29

0 72250 1.290 72250 4.257 238425


0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0.512 83500 0.512 83500


5 31000 0 0 0.775 31000

Sub total 253700.00 320000.00 413000.00 623000.00 1609700.0

0

(MWS 3 -3B2C1i2a )

1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12



In Rs Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin


8 Thervecherop Gaon

Horticulture

Plantation Ha 56000.00 0 0.00 1.290 72250 1.29

0 72250 1.290 72250 3.870 216750


0 0 0.00 0.512 83500 0.512 83500 0 0 1.024 167000

Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0.62 24800.00 0 0 0.77

5 31000 0 0 1.395 55800

9 Kabung Gaon

Horticulture

Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.387 21675.00 1.290 72250 1.29

0 72250 1.290 72250 4.257 238425


0 0 0.00 0.512 83500 0.512 83500 0.51

2 83500 1.536 250500

103

Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0.775 31000.00 0 0 0.77

5 31000 0 0 1.55 62000

10 Barman Pangcho

Gaon

Horticulture

Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.387 21675.00 1.290 72250 1.29

0 72250 1.290 72250 4.257 238425


0 0 0.00 0.512 83500 0 0 0 0 0.512 83500

Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0.775 31000.00 0.775 31000 0.93 37200 0 0 1.655 99200

11 Chek Artur Gaon

Horticulture

Plantation Ha 56000.00 0 0.00 1.290 72250 1.29

0 72250 0 0 2.580 144500


0 0 0.00 0.512 83500 0 0 0 0 0.512 83500

Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0 0.00 0.775 31000 0 0 0 0 0.775 31000

Sub total 130150.00 685000.00 555200.00 300250.00 1670600.0

0

(MWS4-3B2C1i1c)

1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 12



In Rs Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin Phy (No)

Fin


12 Harlongsora Gaon

Horticulture

Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.309 17340.00 0 0 1.39

4 78030 1.290 72250 2.993 167620


0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

13 Waham Langso

Horticulture

Plantation Ha 56000.00 0.405 22686.50 1.341 75140 0 0 1.50

9 84532.5 3.256 182359


0 0 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Areca nut Plantation Ha 40,000.00 0 0.00 0 0 0.84 33604 0 0 0.84 33604

Sub total 40026.50 75140.00 111634.00 156782.50 383583.00

104

Total 516876.50 1547390.0

0 1547084.00 1547282.5

0 5158633.00

Table No. 7.2 Estimated Benefit Cost Ratio

S.No.

Name of the

activity

Total Cost

Total Benefit expecte

d * BCR Remarks

(Rs.in Lakh)

(Rs. In Lakh)

105

EPA 22.38 30

01:01.2

NRM 313.32 367.2 PE 55.95 65

Livelihood for Asset less

50.355 60

Institution and Capacity building

27.975 30

Overall 469.98 552.2 *kindly relate this with table no. 9.2 (expected outcomes)

106

Table No. 7.2 Estimated Benefit Cost Ratio S.No. Name of the activity Total Cost (Rs.) Total Benefit

expected *

(Rs.)

BCR

Remarks

EPA

NRM

PE

Livelihood for Asset less

Institution and Capacity building

Overall

*kindly relate this with table no. 9.2 (expected outcomes)

107

Chapter 8

Consolidation and completion of various works

Table No. 8.1: Consolidation of Action Plan

1 2 Implementation Phase Consolidation/exit Phase

S. No

Component 1 year 2nd year 3rd year 4th year 5th year

Phy

(No)

Fin

(Rs.)

Phy

(No)

Fin

(Rs.)

Phy

(No)

Fin

(Rs.)

Phy

(No)

Fin

(Rs.)

Phy (No) Fin (Rs.)

1 Entry Point Activities (4%)

2 DPR Preparation by

PIA(1%)

2 Institution & Capacity Building (5%)

SLNA-0.3%

DWDU-0.9%

108

PIA-3.8%

3 Productivity Enhancement

(13%)

4 Livelihoods for Assetless

(10%)

5 Natural Resource Management (50 %)

6 Monitoring (1%)

7 Evaluation (1 %)

8 Consolidation phase (5%)

9 Administration (10 %)

109

CHAPTER – 9

EXPECTED OUTCOMES 9.1 Employment

Employment has always been a problem in the village. The principal occupations of the people are dry land agriculture,

animal husbandry and casual labour work. However, rainfall being very limited and erratic, agriculture suffers, i.e. at

best they can take only a single crop, which keeps them partially engaged for about 4 months. Lack of fodder makes

animal husbandry very difficult too. So, animal husbandry does not keep them engaged full time. Thus, the people

mainly depend upon casual labour, either in the village itself or outside it.

The project plans for creation of both wage employment and self-employment opportunities. Wage employment would

be created by engaging people in watershed physical works like construction of earthen bunds, farm bunds, village

pond, plantation etc. self-employment would be created by providing the people with cash support in the form of direct

livelihood activities like agriculture, animal husbandry and enterprise development.

9.1.2. Migration

Low rainfall results in very little fodder availability in the locality. The relatively well off farmers bring fodder from

Diphu (approximately 22 kms away) and Hamren (approximately 35 kms away) collectively; but the resource poor

cannot afford it. On account of agriculture and animal husbandry providing only part time employment for some part of

the year, the people migrate for a better half of the year for wage labour.

110

Employment opportunities in the local area as mentioned above will ensure lessening seasonal migration from the area.

9.1.3. Ground water table

Rainfall has been scanty but demand for ground water has been increasing all the time. The ground water table thus

depleted over years. Presently it stands at 5.8 m.

Proper water harvesting structures and percolation tanks would go a long way in increasing water table depth from 5.8

m in the pre-project level to 5.3 m in the post project period.

9.1.4 Drinking water

People of the village are dependent on existing dug wells for their drinking water. The existing drinking water sources

are insufficient to cater the need of drinking water. As a result of the watershed activities, it is expected that the

quantity of drinking water would improve.

9.1.5 Crops

Agriculture primarily depends upon water; but this is what is lacking in Derajuri village. The surface water is scanty

due to low rainfall and ground water is not feasible to explore for crop production.

All this can change with the integrated land and water management during the watershed project. The planned check

dams and farm ponds would help percolate water underground, and preserve some moisture in the soil. This will help in

additional area coming under cultivation and increasing productivity too. The farmers can take more than one season of

crops. Different varieties of crops can be taken.

111

9.1.6 Vegetative cover

There is negligible area under tree cover. the village has a forest area of 200 ha. there, not concentrated in any area. It is

planned that 15 ha land to be covered under new plantation.

9.1.7 Livestock

The village has quite good of livestock population. These include pigs, cows, , goats. The interventions like provision

of good quality pigs, goats, cows and the establishment of a fodder bank and other such related activities would spur up

the dairy development in the village. It is expected that the post project period would see a substantial increase in

livestock population and yield from them.

Table No. 9.2: Summarize in the table given below (Quantifiable indicators)

1 2 3 4 5 6 S. No. Item

Unit of measurement

Pre-project Status

Expected Post-project Status Remarks

1 Status of water table (Depth to Ground water level)

Meters 13 11 At some point recharge may be observed more but the overall raise of Groundwater table is expected to be about 2 meters.

2 Ground water structures repaired/ rejuvenated No. 5 25 3 Quality of drinking water Description Turbid Water Clear, Potable 4 Availability of drinking water Description Scarce Sufficient Many ring well and tube

well etc. would be provided.

112

5 Increase in irrigation potential Hec. Nil 3600 Supplementary irrigation through improved soil moisture regime. Water distribution channel from water harvesting structures, pumps etc.

6 Change in cropping/ land use pattern Description Single cropping Double Cropping also multiple cropping in suitable areas

7 Area under agricultural crop Hec. 4058 4163 I Area under single crop Hec. Ii Area under double crop Hec. iii Area under multiple crop Hec.

8 Net increase in crop production area Hec. 3869 6300 9 Increase in area under Vegetation/Forest Hec. Nil 78

10 Increase in area under horticulture Hec. Negligible 20 11 Increase in area under fuel Hec. Nil 40 12 Increase in area under Fodder Hec. Nil 25 13 Increase in milk production Litres/day 14 Environmental Impact Environment is in

peril due to lack of vegetation

Improve in Environmental Impact will be noticed

Area under permanent vegetation will be increased

Change in Soil Loss 112 Ton / Ha / Yr Soil loss will be reduced

Soil loss will have to be monitored

Perenniality of flow and change in Run-off Surface runoff will be reduced due to increase in time of concentration & rate of infiltration.

Recharge of ground water 13 11 Ground Water table in open wells area recorded in table 3.14 will have to be maintained and monitored.

14 No. of SHGs Promoted No. 15 Increase in no. of livelihoods No.

113

16 Increase in income Rs. 10000 / Family Av - Rs 30000 / Yr / Family

Socio economic condition will be improved

17 Status of Migration No. 347 Nil Migration is expected to be stopped

18 SHG Federations formed No. Federation of homogenous SHGs will be organized

19 Credit linkage with banks Rs. All UGs and SHGs would have credit linkage

All SHGs will be linked with credit linkage in Banks

20 Resource use agreements Nil Framework under process

Resource use agreements will be applicable for all stake holders

21 WDF collection & management Rs. Nil As detailed in Watershed Development works schedule

22 Summary of lessons learnt Systemic efforts are to be made by the PIA/WDT/WC to learn from the field experiences and also from feed back of independent sources. The following measures are suggested for the PIA/WDT/WC to enable the learning process at different levels. 1. Systematic analysis of monitoring data on a regular basis and sharing with DWDU/SLNA as well as with DoLR throough SLNA. 2. Engaging services of independent academic and voluntary organizations by DWDU/SLNA for taking up research and action research projects. 3. Initiating pilots and innovative models 4. Organize workshops at District / State level sharing success stories of other projects.

Table No.9.3: Backward and Forward Linkages

5 6 7 Type of Marketing Facility Name of the institution Pre-project (no.) Expected post project status

(A) Backward linkages (i) Seed certification Assam Seed Corporation /

Seed Corporation of India Farmers are not procuring certified seeds

Only certified seeds will be procured

(ii) Seed supply system Assam Seed Corporation / Seed Corporation of India

Individual purchase from open market

Seed supply will be only through Organized sector, Department of Agriculture

(iii) Fertilizer supply system Fertilizer Corporation of India From Open Market Department of Agriculture, Assam will ensure genuine supply of Fertilizer.

114

(iv) Pesticide supply system From reputed manufacturers through the Department of Agriculture

From Open Market Department of Agriculture, Assam will ensure genuine supply of Fertilizer.

(v) Credit institutions Langpi Dehangi Rural Bank / UBI / SBI

Almost not being practiced Credit linkage with the banks will be ensured

(vi) Water supply State Department of Public Health Engineering

Private arrangement Ring Wells, Tube Wells are being provided from EPA & WD works. State PHE Deptt will be involved through convergence

(vii) Extension services State Department of Agriculture & Allied services

To some extent services are being provided

Extensive services from Agriculture, Soil Conservation, Fishery, Horticulture, Animal Husbandary and Veterinary will have to be ensured

(viii) Nurseries Provision for creation of Forestry and Horticulture Nursery is made in the DPR

No nursery is there in the project area

Additional supply of seedlings will be made available from State Agriculture and Forest Departments

(ix) Tools/machinery suppliers

Department of Agriculture, Assam

Farmers are procuring by themselves

Provision is made in DPR. To be procured through State Deaprtment of Agriculture

(x) Price Support system State Department of Agriculture

No price support system is functioning in letter and spirit

State Government will have to take appropriate steps

(xi) Labour State Department of Labour and Employment

Not in practice Prevailing rules will be followed

(xii) Any other (please specify)

(B) Forward linkages (i) Harvesting/threshing

machinery State Department of Agriculture

No Action User Federation will take collection action with the State Department of Agriculture

(ii) Storage (including cold storage)

State Department of Agriculture

No cold storage in Project Area

State Department of Agriculture will take appropriate steps

(iii) Road network State PWD Department Needs improvement Road network will have to be improved through PMGRY

(iv) Transport facilities State Deaprtment of Transport

Poor communication Needs to be improved

(v) Markets / Mandis VCDC (Panchayats), Local Bodies

Only 3 markets at present Marketing facilities will have to be increased. State Department of Agriculture will have to take appropriate action.

115

(vi) Agro and other Industries Agro Industries Development Corporation, Assam, State Industries Development Corporation, State Department of Industries and Commerce

Not significant PIA / WDT / WC will coordinate with Diary Development authorities.

(vii) Milk and other collection centres

Dairy Development Department

No production in the Project Area

PIA / WDT / WC will coordinate with Diary Development authorities.

(viii) Labour Department of Labour and Employment

Not significant PIA / WDT / WC will coordinate with Diary Development authorities.

(ix) Any other (please specify)

116

List of Maps to be enclosed along with DPR.

1 .Location –District, mandal, village, watershed location map

2 watershed Map for IWMP Project (Watershed Boundary demarcation in cadastral & Topo Sheet)

3 Social Map (along with photos & paper drawing)-with Existing Structure

4 Resource Map (along with photos & paper drawing)and Land Type

5 Drainage Map (with numbering)

6 Map showing existing structures

a. Proposed action plan map

b. Land use/Land cover map

c. Slope map

d. Soil and land capability class maps

e. GIS maps

B,c,d will be from the PRA maps done in the village

should include Latitude and Longitude and the plot no.

will be provided by JSACS

Date post:	14-Jul-2018
Category:	Documents
Upload:	doanque
View:	228 times
Download:	1 times