+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Determination of the Effect of Walking on the Forced ...

Determination of the Effect of Walking on the Forced ...

Date post: 18-Dec-2021
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
13
UC Berkeley Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) Title Determination of the effect of walking on the forced convective heat transfer coefficient using an articulated mannikin Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2t1426nb Authors Chang, S.KW. Arens, Edward Gonzalez, R.R. Publication Date 1998 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California
Transcript

UC BerkeleyIndoor Environmental Quality (IEQ)

TitleDetermination of the effect of walking on the forced convective heat transfer coefficient using an articulated mannikin

Permalinkhttps://escholarship.org/uc/item/2t1426nb

AuthorsChang, S.KW.Arens, EdwardGonzalez, R.R.

Publication Date1998 Peer reviewed

eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital LibraryUniversity of California

No. 3116

DETERMINATION OF THE EFFECT OF WALKING

ON THE FORCED CONVECTIVEHEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT

USING AN ARTICULATED MANNIKINS.KW. Chang, Ph.D.

ABSTl~CT

E. Arens, Ph.D.ASHFtAE Member

R.R. Gonzalez, Ph.D.ASHRAE Member

This study addresses the effect of the walking motion on local convective heat transfercoefficient at various body sites, employing an articulated mannikin. The forced convectiveheat transfer coefficient (hc) is determined by the naphthalene sublimation technique.Circular naphthalene disks were affixed to various body segments of the articulated mannikin.The mannikin then simulated walking at five different gaits between 0 and 2.0 mph (0 to 0.9m/s, 0 being stationary) under constant temperature (30°C) and wind speed (0.4~0.7 depending on the body segment) in an environmental chamber. The amount of naphthalene weightloss through sublimatlon was translated to hc using the Chilton-Colburn analogy between heatand mass transfer. The results showed that arm movement during walking, unexpectedly,diminished the effective local convective transfer coefficient. Increased gait (from 0 to 2.0mph) actually resulted in a decrease in hc, as measured on the arms and legs. On thenonmoving body trunk, no significant difference in hc was observed with increased gait. Whenthe mannikin was held stationary and the chamber wind speed increased, a correspondingincrease in hc was observed. Thus, during walking, motion of the swinging limbs, the"pendulum" effect, tends to decrease the forced convective heat transfer coefficient asobserved locally on the limbs. For the walking gaits applied in this study, a 5~~7% decreasein hc was observed.

INTRODUCTION

The effect of the swinging appendages during walking and running has been characterized as the"pendulum" effect [Clarket al. 1974] or, in connection with clothing insulation study, the"pumping" effect [Vogt et al. 1983; Olesen et al. lg82]. Clark et al. [1974] studiedevaporative and dry heat loss of an athlete running outdoors, and reported that the localconvective heat transfer coefficient could be increased by at least a factor of two, as aresult of the extra velocity of the limb relative to the trunk. Although they mentioned thatthe effective evaporative coefficient would also be increased by the "pendulum" effect, theydid not quantify the increase nor attempt to separate the convective and evaporativecomponents of this effect. Vogt et al. [1983] studied the "pumping" effect on clothinginsulation using human subjects. Olesen et al. [1982] performed similar studies using amovable thermal mannikin. Complicated by the extra layer of clothing and the microclimatesthe layer created, the results varied. Vogt concluded that "pumping" effect may increase ordecrease the resultant clothing insulation depending on the air temperature. Olesen’s [1982]

S.KW. Chang is Research Biomedical Engineer with the Biophysics Branch, Military ErgonomicsDivision, U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine (USARIEM), Natick, MA.E. Arens is Professor, Department of Architecture, University of California at Berkeley.R.R. Gonzalez is Chief, Biophysics Branch, USARIEM, Natick,

The views, opinions, and/or findings contained in this report are those of the author(s)and should not be construed as an official Department of the Army position, policy, ordecision, unless so designated by other official documentation.

7]

mphillips
Text Box
© 1988, American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc. (www.ashrae.org). Published in ASHRAE Transactions 1988, Vol 94, Part 1. For personal use only. Additional distribution in either paper or digital form is not permitted without ASHRAE’s permission.

data showed negligible change in thermal insulation value between sitting and bicycling;whereas, Olesen and Madsen [1983] and Olesen and Nielsen [1984] reported a S0%~50% reductionin insulationdue to walking and wind effect.

This study focuses on how walking motion affects the convective heat transfer coefficientof forced flow. The effect of arm and leg swing on hc was investigated using an articulatedmannikin. A mannikin offers the advantage of exact and repeatable motion, and also avoids theproblem of perspiration and eliminates any evaporative contribution usually involved inexercising human subjects. Convective coefficient, hc, is determined using a modification ofthe naphthalene sublimation technique [Nishi and Gagge 1970] based on heat and mass transferanalogy, independent of any energy and metabolism measurement.

~ETHOD AND T~SRY

Heat-mass transfer analogy of a sublimating substance has been traditionally used toaccurately predict the forced convective heat transfer coefficient [Sogin 1958; Neal 1974].Naphthalene very conveniently subllmates at room temperature and thus has been used by anumber of investigators to experimentally determine hc. Sparrow ans Tien [1977, 1979] stu~ie~forced convection to a squ~e plate at d~erent yaw angles. Sog~n [19583 applied jet streamnormally to naphthalene d~sks. Nish~ and Gagge [19~0] attached naphthalene balls to dlf~erentbody segments on h~ subjects. The convective tr~sfer of the Ball was then related to thecorresponding body segment by approximating the body se~ent as a cylinder and using the knownconvective relationship between ball ~d cylinder.

in our study, circui~ naphthalene d~sks were ~ttached to the ~ur~ace o~ v~rious bodysegments on a lifesize (18.08 ft ~, or 1.68 m~), articulated m~nikin, The naphthalene diskswere appropriately curved to conform to the corresponding body se~ent curvature. Air~low wasdirected normally at the disk surface. Since the naphthalene disk conforms to the bodyse~ent curvature and sits directly over the specific body site, the local hc over thespecific site is measured, rather th~ ~ average hc ~or the entire body segment. Scaling o~results to translate from cylinder to ball, and extrapolation of body d~eter and shape fromcylinder study thereby become unnecess~y.

Heat - Mass Transfer Eelatlonsh~p

Mass tr~sfer of naphthalene subl~mation hm can be expressed as KNishi and Gagge 1970]

hm = R ~ Ta ~ ~ / (Ps - Pa)

hm = naphthalene mass tr~s~er coefficient (m/s)~ = measured naphthalene sublimation loss

per surface ~ea (kg~m-~ ~s-i)Ta = ~bient temperature (K)Ps = naphthalene surface vapor pressure (~g)Pa = naphthalene vapor pressure in air (ass~ed = O)R = naphthalene gas constant (0.48~ ~g~m~ ~kg-1 ~K-1)

Assuming that the heat of sublimation is negligible, Pssaturated vapor pressure at Ta [Sherwood and Trass 1960],

may be cons£dered as equal to the

or,

lOgloP s = 11.55 - 3765/Ta

Ps = 10(11"55-3765/Ta)Ps in mmHg, Ta in K

72

The Chilton-Colburn analogy j-factor [ASHRAE Fundamentals 1985] can be described:

for heat transfer Jh =hc

peCpeU(Pr) 2/3, with Pr =

Cp’~

for mass transfer Jm =hm

(Sc) 2/3, with Sc =p°Dv

hc = heat transfer coefficient (W’m-2.K-l )

hm = mass transfer coefficient (m/s)~ = thermal conductivity (W.m-l-K-I )

Cp = specific heat (J-kg-1-K-i)

~ = viscosity (kg*m-~*s-I )

Pr = Prandtl’s number (ND)Sc = Schmidt’s number (ND)Dv = mass diffuslvity (m2/s)p = density (kg/m8)u = air velocity (m)

Equating heat and mass transfer j-factor,

hc hm(pr) 2/3 = (Sc) 2/3

pocp*u u

hc = p’Cp ( Sc )2/3 . hm {5}Pr hc in W/(m2"°C)

hc = p’Cp (Le)2/3 " hmLewis number ~ Le = Sc/Pr

Experiment

The articulated mannikin at the biophysics branch is capable of s~mulated walking up to 80steps/min. Length of the leg stride and arm swing are individually adjustable. For thisexperiment, five walking gaits of 0 (stationary), 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mph (0-0.9 m/s) applied. The environmental chamber was set at Ta = 3(~C, with dew point at 5°C (relativehumidity ~20~). The reglonal air velocity ranged between 0.4 and 0.7 m/s at different bodysegments of the mannikin. The duration of each experiment was 55 minutes. The regionaltemperature and air velocity were measured at five sites: upper arm, lower arm, thigh, calf,and chest. Figure 1 gives a schematic representation of the locations of naphthalene disks onthe mannikin. Omnidirectional thermal anemometers and thermistor temperature probes wereplaced approximately 2 cm above and 2 cm away from the naphthalene disk, in such a way as notto disturb the impinging airflow to the disk. The omnidirectional anemometers have a responsetime of two seconds. Airflow in the chamber is directed normally at the disks.

Scintillation grade naphthalene with a melting point of approximately 8~C was poured intocasting disk cassettes, which were modified from aluminum camera lens covers. The ckstingsquickly hardened at room temperature, after which a nonadhering cover plate is removed toreveal a smooth naphthalene surface. The cassettes were appropriately curved to conform tosurface curvatures of the upper arm, lower arm, thigh, and calf of the mannikin. Castingcassettes used for the chest were not curved. The curved cassettes expose an elliptic ratherthan circular surface. The elliptic surface area of each cassette disk was measured andproperly quantified during evaluation of the ~ term in Equation i The disks were mountedinto vinyl retainers which were in turn fastened to the mannikin with hook and pile straps.The square vinyl sheets have a circular hole cut in the middle. Circumference of the hole isslightly smaller than the disk cassette, so that each cassette snapped tightly into theretainer. Immediately after casting, the disks were stored individually in airtightcontainers. All naphthalene disks were allowed to equilibrate in the chamber at 30oC for 24hours before using. The disks were weighed immediately before and after an experiment on abalance sensitive to ~O.Ol mg.

73

RESULTS

Table 1 shows the regional air velocity with the mannikin assuming a stationary position.This level of regional wind speed was maintained throughout the experiment. Also shown is thelocal hc at the specific sites, measured and computed using Equation 1 through Equation 5.For each study run, hc was averaged over the 55 minute experiment period. The results inTable 1 are the average of 15 runs.

Figure 2 gives the local hc at the five naphthalene disk sites: upper arm, lower arm,calf, chest, and thigh. The five walking speeds were 0 (standstill), 20, 40, 60, and steps/mln, which translate to gaits from 0 to 2.0 mph (0~0.9 m/s). In Figure 2, the five rowsof bar graph represent hc measurement at the five naphthalene disk sites. The columnsrepresent the mannikin walking speed. For example, the hat graphs in the first row give theupper arm hc of 23.47, 23.05, 22.77, 22.51, and 22.42 W/(m~°C), at the five walking speedsof O, 20, 40, 60 and 80 steps/min, respectively. Student’s T-tests were evaluated between thestationary position hc and hc at each of the four gaits, to determine if the difference wassignificant. The t-values from the T-test are also included in Figure 2, and are shown atthe bottom of each bar graph. A t-value > 2.101 indicates that the decrement is significant,with p<O.05.

A more comprehensive set of the information presented in Figure 2 is tabulated in Table 2.Table 2a shows ha with the corresponding dispersion range (standard deviation value). Table 2b, additional t-values are included. The 0-20, 0-40, 0-60, and 0-80 columns give thecomputed t-values between walking speeds of 0 and 20, 0 and 40, 0 and 60, 0 and 80steps/min, respectively. The data in these first four columns represent the t-values included

an example, the 20-40 column indicates t-value between the 20 and 40 steps/min gaits.

The four walking gaits were 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 mph (0.22, 0.45, 0.67, and 0.89 m/s).However, the arm swing and leg stride of the articulated mannikin were set at differentlengths to represent a natural human walking motion. The upper arm disk and lower arm disknecessarily experience different motion because they attach onto different portions of the armswing arc. A similar condition exists for disks attached to the leg. Therefore, theequivalent forward velocity experienced by the disks was different from the walking gaits.The resultant linear velocities as experienced by the naphthalene disks at the four walkinggaits are summarized in Table 3. The mannikin walked at 20, 40, 60, and 80 steps/min. Linearvelocities were calculated using the full swing length of 13 cm, 31 cm, 16 cm, and 51 cm forthe disk mounted on the upper arm, lower arm, thigh, and calf, respectively. Table 3represents only the singular effect of walking. The chamber air velocity, shown in Table 1,is an additional factor that interacts with the linear velocity of the disk during walking.

To further ascertain that the decrement in hc as shown in Figure 2 was indeed due to thewalking motion and not artifact, another set of experiments were performed without thecomplication of limb movement. Figure 3 gives the data obtained when the mannikin was heldstationary, but with the chamber wind speed set at levels comparable to the walking gaits.

DISCUSSION

Rapp [1972] defined the free and mixed convection region as that ambient air velocity is < 0.2m/s. Hence, from Table i, the experimental condition in our study was well into the forcedconvection region. The measured hc should, therefore, be predominately hc from forcedairflow. Nishi and Gagge [1970] reported for subjects undergoing free walking at 4 mph (~1.8m/s), that the regional c at t he a rms a nd legs were 16~17 W/(m~®°C). They operated at normal ambient air movement of 0.15~0.2 m/s. Considering that chamber air velocity in thisstudy was between 0.4~0.7 m/s, the range of hc shown in Table i, 22~23 W/(m~¢°C), appears be in a reasonable range when compared to their original work.

Figure 2 and Table 2 give the regional hc at the five naphthalene disk sites, upper arm,lower arm, calf, chest, and thigh, at the five walking speeds, O, 20, 40, 60, and 80steps/min. On the upper and lower arms, there is clearly a decreasing trend for hc as themannikin walking speed increased from 0 to 80 steps/min. Decrease in hc was between 5~ and7~. The t-value from Student’s T-test showed each decrement to be statistically significant.In contrast, for the chest site, hc stayed quite constant, and t-value showed no

74

statistically significant difference between gaits. The motion of the arm apparently caused adecrease in the forced convective heat transfer coefficient, evident, perhaps from locallzedwind currents at these sites. Although the exact mechanism is not apparent, one possibleexplanation could be that the naphthalene disks experienced nonuniform airflow during the armswing cycle. On the forward stroke of the arm swing, the naphthalene disks were moving i~ theopposite direction to the chamber airflow. The alrflow that the disks encountered wasenhanced (a vector sum). Conversely, on the backward stroke of the arm swing, the arm andchamber airflow were in the same direction. Airflow experienced by the disk was thereforediminished (a vector difference). Naphthalene sublimation rate, hence hc, does not varylinearly with changing air velocity [Nishi and Gagge 1970]. The effect of a vector sum(forward stroke) and a vector difference (backward stroke), not surprisingly, do not canceleach other. The measured hc thus is rationally a combination of the two effects, averagedover the 55 minute study period. At present, we can only ascertain the average air velocityfrom the data. Our omnidirectional anemometers (response time = 2 second) do not have fastenough response time to distinctly measure the different air velocities that must exist on theforward and backward strokes. An investigation with faster response anemometers to study theair velocity variation during each arm swing is currently underway.

On the calf, a 7~ decrease in hc was also evident. Here, however, we found that hc didnot further decrease after walking speed of 80 steps/mln but, rather, showed an increase at 80steps/min. From Tables 1. and 3, chamber air velocity on the calf (1.54 mph, Table 1) andlocal linear velocity of the calf disk at 80 steps/min (1.52 mph, Table 3) became comparable.It could be that at a point prior to the two speeds becoming comparable, the combined vectorsum and vector difference yielded a minimum average airflow over the disk, hence a minimum hc.This minimum should also exist for the upper arm and lower arm cases, but the articulatedmannikin’s walking speed could not be further increased to reach this point of minimum.Faster response anemometers should also facilitate the determination of this minimum point.

The thigh data in Figure 2 showed no particular pattern. One peculiarity about the thighdata is also evident in Nishi and Gagge’s [1970] results. Comparison of Nishi and Gagge’sTables 3 and 4 showed that on the bicycle ergometer, increase in hc paralleled the increasein air movement on the thigh. However, with free walking, hc is ~25~ lower on the thigh thanother sites, e.g. upper arm and legs, with similar air movements. Nonetheless, relativemotion of the limbs could still be the determinant. Only this time, there were two relativemotions involved. It can be seen from the schematic representation of Figure I, thenaphthalene disk on the thigh was at the same level as the hand. As the mannikin walked, thehand swung in the opposite direction to the thigh. Movement of the hand could thus disturbthe impinging airflow over the thigh disk. On a bicycle ergometer, presumably the arms do notswing in opposite directions to modify airflow over the thighs. In our study, relative motionof the arm and leg could have generated a very complex airflow pattern over the thigh disk,the result of which simply cannot be visualized from only the averaged anemometer data.

Data in Figure 3 were obtained with the mannikin held stationary and the chamber air speedset at levels comparable to the walking gaits. On a standstill mannikin, hc from all fivenaphthalene disks increased accordingly with increasing chamber air velocity. The observationthat it is the walking motion that decreased the effective local hc, is further reinforced.

Another implication of the above result is that when human subjects are used in a study,the nonconvective heat loss could be a much more significant factor than Clark et al. [1974]had suggested. The naphthalene sublimation method measures only the convective transfer.Also, since a mannikin does not perspire, all evaporative processes, such as evaporation andcontamination of naphthalene by sweat, are elimlnated. Assuming that the pendulum motion ofthe limbs indeed doubles the heat loss as described by Clark, this doubling cannot beattributed to an enhanced convection, because pure convective heat loss, as found in thisstudy, is decreased rather than increased by the "pendulum" effect. Hence, the major bulk ofthe increase in heat loss by the "pendulum" effect during human walking and running must benonconvective, perhaps evaporative and radiant, in nature.

CONCLUSION

This study looked at the effect of walking on the convective heat transfer coefficient offorced airflow. It was found that walking, or the motion of the swinging limbs duringwalking, generally decreased the forced hc as measured on the arms and legs. For the walkinggaits applied in this study, a 5~7% decrease in hc was observed. This amount of decrease inhc, dlsplayed in Figure 2, must represent, quantitatively, the "pendulum" effect. A furtherstudy with faster response anemometers are needed to investigate in detail, the mechanism thatcaused the hc decrement.

P~EFERENCE

ASHRAE. 1985. ASHRAE handbook--1985 fundamentals, Chapter 5, "Mass transfer." Atlanta:American Society of Heating, Refrigerating, and Air-condltionlng Engineers, Inc.

Clark, R.P.; Mullan, B.J.; Pugh, L.G.C.E; and Toy, N. 1974. "Heat losses from the movinglimbs in Running: the ’pendulum’ effect." Journal of Physiology, Vol. 240, pp. 8p-gp.

Neal, S.B.H.C. 1975 "The development of the thin-film naphthalene mass-transfer analoguetechnique for the direct measurement of heat-transfer coefficients." InternationalJournal of Heat Mass Transfer, Vol. 18, pp. 559-567.

Nishi, Y. and Gagge, A.P. 1970. "Direct evaluation of convective heat transfer coefficient bynaphthalene sublimation." Journal of A~d ~hysiolqgy, Vol. 29, pp. 830-838.

Olesen, B.W. and Madsen, T.L. 1983. "Measurements of the thermal insulation of clothing by amovable thermal manikin." International Congress ’Medical and Biophysical Aspects ofProtective Clothing’, July, Lyon.

Olesen, B.W. and Nielsen, R. 1984. "A comparison of the thermal insulation measured on athermal manikin and on human subjects." Proceedings 3rd Internatlonal Conference onIndoor Air ~uallty and Climate: INDOOR AIR ’84, Stockholm, Vol. 5, pp. 343-348.

Olesen, B.W.; Sliwinska, E.; ~adsen, T.L.; and Fanger, P.O. 1982. "Effect of body posture andactivity on the thermal insulation of clothing: measurements by a movable thermalmanikin." ASH1L~E Transactions, Vol. 88, pp. 791-805.

Sherwood, T.K. and Trass, 0. 1960. "Sublimation mass transfer through compressible boundarylayers on a flat plate." Transactions AS~E, Vol. 82, Series C, pp. 313-$24.

Sogln, H.H. 1958. "Sublimation from disks to air streams flowing normal to their surfaces."Transactions AS~E, Vol. 80, pp. 61-69.

Sparrow, E.M. and Tien, K.K. 1977. "Forced heat transfer at an inclined and yawed squareplate - application to solar collectors." Journal of Heat Transfer, Vol. 99, pp. 507-512.

Tien, K.K. amd Sparrow, E.M. 1979. "Local heat transfer and fluid flow characteristics forairflow oblique or normal to a square plate." International Journal of Heat MassTransfe_r, Vol. 22, pp. 349-360.

Vogt, J.J.; Meyer, J.P.; Candas, V.; Libert, J.P.; and Sagot, J.C. 1983. "Pumping effect onthermal insulation of clothing worn by humans subjects." Ergonomics, Vol. 26, No. i0, pp.963-974.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors wish to express their thanks to Robert A. Oster, M.S. for his assistance in thestatistical analysis.

v6

TABLE 1

Regional air velocity and local hc on a stationary articulated mannikin

naphthalenedisk site

Upper Arm

Lower Arm

Thigh

Calf

Chest

regionalair velocity

mph (m/s)

1.59 * 0.02

(0.71 ± 0.01

0.93 ~ 0.03

(0.42 ¯ 0.01

1.09 * 0.03

(0.49 ± 0.01

local hc

W/(m~ .o C)

23.47 ¯ 0.42

22.64 ¯ 0.39

18.84 ¯ 0.34

24.37 * 0.52

16.62 ¯ 0.38

77

TABLE 2a

Local hc at walking speed of O, 20, 40, 60, and 80 steps/min.

hc ¯ standard deviation W/(m~°°C)

0 20 40 60 80

Upper Arm

Lower Arm

Calf

Chest

Thigh

23.47 ¯ 0.42

22.46 ¯ 0.39

24.37 ¯ 0.52

16.62 ¯ 0.38

18.84 ¯ 0.34

23.05 ¯ 0.45

22.34 ¯ 0.38

24.11 ¯ 0.44

16.85 ¯ 0.37

19.63 ¯ 0.38

22.77 ~ 0.19

22.03 * 0.29

23.44 * 0.33

16.76 * 0.25

19.35 * 0.31

22.51 ± 0.17

21.48 * 0.23

22.69 * 0.19

16.75 * 0.21

19.40 * 0.19

22.42 ± 0.20

21.08 :~ 0.28

24.05 :~ 0.25

16.66 :~ 0.27

19.61 ± 0.27

TABLE 2b

t-value between different walking speeds

t-value between walking speeds

0-20 0-40 0-60 0-80 20-40 40-60 60-80

Upper Arm

Lower Arm

Calf

Chest

Thigh

2.670

2.170

1.473

-1.708

-6.046

5.908

4.839

5.828

-1.166

-4.361

8.212

10.000

11.720

-1.183

-5.626

8.721

12.625

2.168

-0.328

-6.946

2.211

2.435

4.742

0.827

2.206

3.978

5.812

7.517

0.063

-0.498

1.259

4.283

-16.777

1.041

-2.517

78

TABLE 3

Local linear velocity us seen by the naphthalene disksus result of the walking motion

Upper Arm

Lower Arm

Thigh

Calf

full swinglength

13 cm

31 cm

16 cm

51 cm

walking speed (steps/min)20 40 60

local linear velocity mph (m/s)

8O

0.10 0.19 0.29 0.39

(0.04) (0.09) (0.13) (0.17)

O. 23 O. 46 O. 69 O. 92

(0.10) (0.21,) (0.31) (0.41)

O. 12 O. 24 O. 36 O. 48

(0.05) (0.11) (0.16) (0.21)

0.38 0,76 1,.14 1.52

(0.17) (0.34) (0.51) (0.68)

79

Thigh Calf Upper &~m

D scussi )

E.G. PLETT, Carleton University, Ottawa, Ontario: Wouldn’t you need to account for the flow allaround the body and each limb, rather than just the front stagnation region, since the flow aroundthe side of a cylinder yields a higher convective coefficient than in the stagnation region?

S.KW. CHANG: The gist of your question is correct. Our results represent only the localconvective coefficient and not that of the entire circumference of a body segment. I suppose if wehad used cylindrical naphthalene rings rather than disks, they might account for convection allaround each body segment. A compromise had to be made, as in all experimental studies, betweenwhat is ideal and what can reasonably be accomplished. Ideally, we should encase each bodysegment entirely with naphthalene to study the total covection of each body segment--but thatsimply isn’t practical. We used disks because they can be made easily and quickly, and we had tomake a large number of them for our study.

82


Recommended