Date post: | 27-Mar-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | gabrielle-flanagan |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Development-Knowledge Transfer
Survey results over time: • Recognition of CCGC name was 49-50% in 2002 moving up to 74%
by 2003
• Ranking of most useful guidelines:2002: Diabetes, Depression, Asthma2003: Colorectal, Pediatric Immunizations, Diabetes2009 (May): Asthma, Gestational Diabetes, SBIRT
• Sustained interest in having CCGC continue to:– Develop guidelines– Convene stakeholders– Help practices prepare for systems change
EVALUATE
Guideline Uptake
Survey published in Critical Pathways in Cardiology (June, 2008)
Guideline use before and after dissemination: rates varied between 42.9% and 51.2%
Implementation-systems integration
Rapid Improvement Activity (RIA)
Fit Now Results:
By 12 months participants had lost, on average 11.3 pounds when compared to baseline weight (p<.01, 95% CI: 4.3;18.4 pounds) which corresponds to a 5.6% loss of original body weight. Changes between 6 and 12 months were not significant.
TOTAL ENROLLMENT REFERRALSCURRENT ENROLLMENT
REFERRALS County
2 1 Adams
67 37 Garfield
0 0 Lincoln
0 0Larimer
30 16 Alamosa
35 23Alamosa
8 4 Summit
4 1 Weld
14 10 Kiowa
0 0 Baca
Fit Now Colorado RIA Sites by County: Referrals/Enrollment92 Patients enrolled
SBIRT Colorado Progress to Date
• 46,598 patients screened• 54% of patients scored in low or no risk category• 29% scored at risk for tobacco only• 12% scored in moderate risk category (BI)• 2% scored in high moderate risk category (BT)• 3% scored in high risk category (RT)
Pneumococcal Immunization Rates
Inpatient Pneumococcal Vaccination Rates
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Q32005
Q4 Q12006
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q12007
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q12008
Q2
% U
TD
Patients 65+ Diabetes 19-64 y.o. COPD 19-64 y.o.
Pneumococcal Immunization RatesCommunity Health Service Pneumococcal Vaccination
Rates
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Q32005
Q4 Q12006
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q12007
Q2 Q3 Q4 Q12008
Q2
% U
TD
Ages 65+ Ages 19-65 Diabetes Ages 19-64 COPD
CCGC Tobacco Program
June 9, 2009
Co-Directors:
• Alison Long, MPH
• Michele Patarino, MBA, MSHA
Project Managers:
• Debbie Dion
• Emily Gingerich
CCGC Tobacco Team
Tobacco Program Overview
Show Me The Data
Intervention Participation QuitLine Self Report
Chart Audit/ registry or
EMRAdditional
data
CMEX
TRIAX X X
TRIA with IPIP X X X X
Mini-grantsX X X X
Grantsx x X X X
Tobacco Program Provider Participation
6www.coloradoguidelines.org/tobacco
Grants to Healthcare Organizations
Grants to Healthcare Organizations
MedSouth
8www.coloradoguidelines.org/tobacco
Grants to Healthcare Organizations
Intervention Participation QuitLine Self Report
Chart Audit/ registry or
EMRAdditional
data
CMEX
TRIAX X X
TRIA with IPIP X X X X
Mini-grantsX X X X
Grantsx x X X X
Tobacco Rapid Improvement Activity(TRIA)
TRIA’s
Examples of Practice Changes Following the TRIA
WHAT WHO HOWASK about tobacco status Intake nurse or MA •Intake form – add “Do you use
tobacco?”•Add Tobacco Use tab in EMR•Amend vital sign stamp to include smoking status
ADVISE to quit RN, NP, PA, MD Provider is prompted to advise patient to quit b/c of chart documentation or b/c QL fax form is on chart
REFER for help RN, NP, PA, MD or staff cessation specialist
QuitLine referral materials (brochures, fax forms, prescription pads) are available in exam rooms
Tobacco Rapid Improvement Activity (TRIA)
Intervention Participation QuitLine Self Report
Chart Audit/ registry or
EMRAdditional
data
CMEX
TRIAX X X
TRIA with IPIP X X X X
Mini-grantsX X X X
Grantsx x X X X
TRIA Results
Average Goals Implemented per Practice Within 6 Weeks
66%
34% ImplementedGoals
NotImplemented
15www.coloradoguidelines.org/tobacco
Practice TRIA Goals
97%
3% Implemented atLeast One Goal
NotImplemented
Asthma Patient Tobacco Measures
33%
61%52%
68%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Ask Pre Ask Post CounselPre
CounselPost
IPIP Tobacco Measures
Diabetes Patient Tobacco Measures
62%
79%
66%73%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Ask Pre Ask Post CounselPre
CounselPost
Additional Data Source: Colorado QuitLine
QuitLine Fax Referrals from CCGC Grantee & TRIA Practices
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
Jun-
06
Aug
-06
Oct
-06
Dec
-06
Feb
-07
Apr
-07
Jun-
07
Aug
-07
Oct
-07
Dec
-07
Feb
-08
Apr
-08
Jun-
08
Aug
-08
Oct
-08
Dec
-08
Feb
-09
Apr
-09
month
# o
f re
ferr
als
Referrals
28%
36%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
Coaching w/o NRT Coaching w/NRT
Colorado QuitLine Success Rates
1-800-Quit-Now
RIA Flyers
Boulder, Coloradohttp://sprucestreetinternalmedicine.com
Hillary Browne, MD, FACP
• ColoradoPractice Coaches: Debbie Barnett & Deb Maltby
• Improving Diabetes Care• Start date: January 2007• Number of diabetes patients in the registry:
~250
Description of Practice• Boulder, Colorado• 3500-4000 active patients,
5% Medicare• 3.5 full time equivalent providers• Aim: to provide excellent,
comprehensive diabetes care; NCQA certification
• Staff: Manager, Phone receptionist, 2 front office, 4 MAs, 4 file clerks, part time dietician.
• Quality improvement team: 1 front office, 1 back office (MA), office manager, 2 providers, QI coach
Data collection
• Reach My Doctor (RMD): portal with diabetes and asthma registries
• Special features we use: – Care plan/flow sheet– labs automatically populate flow sheets– email reminders– labs can be emailed with our comments– patients can view their care plans
Planned care at Spruce Street …how it works
• Registry • Protocols
– Patient makes appointment and DM goes on the schedule– File clerk pulls the chart (red dot) and prints the flow sheet– MA notes that patient has DM and removes patient’s shoes– If annual sensory exam is due, she performs and
documents the exam– Visit with provider focuses on flow sheet, which is given to
patient at the end of the appointment– Self-management goals and reminder
Retinal Exams
6/07 to 5/08 6/08 to 5/09
Adopting a clinical protocol: overcoming provider insulin resistance!
• Registry enabled us to clearly identify patients with hgb AICs > 9
• Leading to a conscious decision to relearn insulin regimens to achieve better glycemic control
• MAs now trained to teach patients to administer insulin and monitor blood sugars
Spruce Street Internal MedicineA1c > 9
6/07 to 5/08 5/08 to 4/09
Spruce Street Internal MedicineA1c < 7
6/07 to 5/08 5/08 to 4/09
Spruce Street Internal MedicineBP < 130/80
6/07 to 5/08 5/08 to 4/09
Spruce Street Internal MedicineBP < 140/90
6/07 to 5/08 5/08 to 4/09
Spruce Street Internal MedicineLDL < 100
6/07 to 5/08 5/08 to 4/09
Spruce Street Internal MedicineKidney Assessment
6/07 to 5/08
6/07 to 5/08 6/08 to 5/09
Spruce Street Internal MedicineFlu Vaccine
6/07 to 5/08 6/08 to 5/09
Spruce Street Internal MedicineFoot Exams
6/07 to 5/08 6/08 to 5/09
Sustainable improvement
• Routine protocols with immediate correction if not followed
• Staff feels responsible and integral to successful patient outcomes
• Patients develop stronger connections with ancillary staff
• Ultimate outcome is improved satisfaction for patients and staff
Next steps
• Focus on high-risk patients (hgbAiC > 9)• Challenge ourselves to attain goals on
individual diabetes measures. • Asthma registry initiated• Move forward with plan include COPD and
heart/stroke• Coordinate timely office follow up after
hospitalization to prevent readmission.
Thank you
• To all of our providers and staff for their exceptional performance
• And to Allyson Gottsman, Associate Director, and Marjie Grazi Harbrecht, MD, Medical/Executive Director of the Colorado Clinical Guidelines Collaborative
LDL in control
Chet CedarsLone Tree Family Practice
Lone Tree Family Practice
• Two physicians and two nurse practitioners One physician spends ½ time in clinical work and ½ time in practice management. One nurse practitioner spends ½ time clinical work and ½ time as Care Manager. (three FTE)
• Use Allscripts/Misys EMR with imbedded orders in Preventive Health Module based on sex, age and diagnosis.
• Query Reports to pull patient lists based on Dx and other clinical data.
Patients with 1 LDL in last 12 months
Pct of DM patients w ith >=1 LDLs
0
20
40
60
80
100
LDL < 100Pct of DM patients w ith latest LDL <100
0
20
40
60
80
100
System that Underpins Performance
• Improvements can be applied at any point to make the system perform better
To improve timely LDL measurements:
• Print list of patients with LDL >100– Mailing labels for outreach
• Last LDL date and value available at time of service
• Informal provider consensus regarding how often to measure assists with consistent messaging to patients
Interventions to Help Patients Achieve LDL Target
• Lab values auto imported to diabetes tab, including LDL
• Informal consensus among providers regarding management
• Aggressive follow up • Print out of trends from PHP registry• Guidelines and targets shared with patients • Provider directed self management strategy• Some assistance with DAPs for Rx as needed
Sustaining Activities when at Target
• Periodic re-measurement• Reinforcement of care plan • Positive reinforcement with trending graphs
Appropriate Follow Up
• Aggressive follow up encouraged
• Patients engaged in progress toward goal
• Patients recognize ongoing follow up essential for optimal outcomes
Still working on…
• Strategy to get patients in based on last date of LDL
• More data points auto populated for diabetes care parameters
• Continuing process to eliminate double data entry
• Documentation of self management goals
Improving Performance in Improving Performance in Practice - Evaluation DataPractice - Evaluation Data
June, 2009June, 2009
Perry DickinsonPerry Dickinson
ElementsElements• Registry data – performance measures• Assessment of Diabetes Management
(clinician survey)• Patient data from trial practices• Qualitative data from practice interviews• Chart audit data for trial practices –
coming soon• In slides: ** means p<.01, * means p<.05,
+ means nearing significance
Diabetes Process MeasuresDiabetes Process Measures
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Eye** Renal+ Aspirin** Feet** Flu shot*
Diabetes Outcome MeasuresDiabetes Outcome Measures
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
A1c >9+ LDL <130+ LDL <100 BP <140/90 BP <130/80
Asthma MeasuresAsthma Measures
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Symptoms ICS Actionplan
Smokingasked*
Smokingcounsel+
Patient MeasuresPatient Measures• Only those 11 practices involved in the
randomized clinical trial• Patients recruited from a list of diabetic
patients provided by practice • Same patients at baseline, 9, 18 months• 244 patients at baseline, 235 at 9 months• 18 month f/u data soon!• Patient self report regarding various
aspects of their diabetes care
Checked in Past 12 MonthsChecked in Past 12 Months
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
A1c* Eyes Feet* Lipids* Renal*
Baseline 9 months
Overall Diabetes Process of CareOverall Diabetes Process of Care
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Total* Process* SMS
Baseline 9 months
• Process – A1c, urinary protein, cholesterol, eye exam, foot exam done over past year
• SMS – Self-Management Support - Dietary counseling, goal setting, home glucose monitoring dealt with over past year
• Total = checks + PSMS
Clinician SurveyClinician Survey
• Assessment of Clinician Diabetes Management (ACDM) – designed to measure the level of implementation of elements of the Chronic Care Model
• 42 practices; 181 clinicians at baseline, 80 post-intervention
ACDMACDM
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Teams** SMS** Info Sys** QI**
Qualitative DataQualitative Data
• Interviews of key informants (lead physician, practice manager, key staff) from 8 IPIP practices regarding issues around their diabetes improvement efforts through IPIP
• All practices had engaged to the point of reporting measures
• Qualitative interviews of the trial practices are in progress
Practices InterviewedPractices Interviewed
• Six from Denver metropolitan area, one from Pueblo, and one from Colorado Springs
• Ranged from three to seven clinicians,• Three belonged to an IPA in the Denver
area, two to other IPAs, and three were independent
• Primarily family medicine, with one internal medicine
Clinical ChangesClinical Changes• Practices all implemented mechanisms to identify
and track their patients with diabetes • Most used flow sheets to assist with data
management and point of care decision support –key in organizing care
• Virtually all developed a distinguished “diabetic visit”- helped focus visit activities
• Most expanded MAs’ activities, including screening questions, assessment and performance of needed labs or services
• Many developed patient recall systems to bring patients in when visits and services were due.
BarriersBarriers
• The major barrier was time
• Substantial financial costs – mostly personnel
• Insufficient staff
• “It is hard to have more than one person in the practice trained and up to speed on doing this, and they tend to be upwardly mobile.”
• Staff and clinician turnover an issue
• Problems getting information from consultants
IT BarriersIT Barriers
• Duplication of effort in data entry a huge issue, especially in practices with EHR
• Lack of ability to enter data once and have it show up in the appropriate places for administrative, clinical, and quality data reporting and use
• Often easier for practices without an EHR to implement a registry
• Practices with paper charts - charts not always available, time spent tracking them down.
BenefitsBenefits
• Improved quality of care• “Power of having better data for managing patients.” • Possibility of financial benefit through bonuses, pay-
for-performance, higher coding, group visits, and bringing patients in for services
• Improved organization and efficiency of work flow• Improved morale for clinicians • Greatly improved staff satisfaction • Staff more engaged and invested in the practice -felt
like they were more an important part of patient care
Colorado April 2008 v March 2009
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100D
MP
ctA
1C
Ab
ove
9
DM
Pct
A1
CU
nd
er7
DM
Pct
Asp
irin
DM
Pct
BP
Be
low
13
0
DM
Pct
BP
Be
low
14
0
DM
Pct
Eye
Exa
m
DM
Pct
Eye
Re
f
DM
Pct
Flu
Va
cc
DM
Pct
Fo
otE
xam
DM
Pct
LD
LU
nd
er1
00
DM
Pct
LD
LU
nd
er1
30
DM
Pct
Mic
roa
lb
DM
Pct
Sm
okC
ess
DM
Pct
To
ba
cco
Qu
ery
DM
Pct
With
A1
C
DM
Pct
With
LD
L
DM
Pct
SM
Go
al
DM
Pct
Sta
tin
DM
Pct
Ace
Arb
DM
Pct
Pts
Pn
eu
mo
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
DM
Pct
A1
CA
bove
9
DM
Pct
A1
CU
nder
7
DM
Pct
Asp
irin
DM
Pct
BP
Be
low
130
DM
Pct
BP
Be
low
140
DM
Pct
Eye
Exa
m
DM
Pct
Eye
Ref
DM
Pct
Flu
Va
cc
DM
Pct
Fo
otE
xam
DM
Pct
LDLU
nder
100
DM
Pct
LDLU
nder
130
DM
Pct
Mic
roal
b
DM
Pct
Sm
okC
ess
DM
Pct
To
bacc
oQ
uer
y
DM
Pct
With
A1C
DM
Pct
With
LD
L
DM
Pct
SM
Goa
l
DM
Pct
Sta
tin
DM
Pct
Ace
Arb
DM
Pct
Pts
Pn
eum
o
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
DM
Pct
A1C
Abo
ve9
DM
Pct
A1C
Und
er7
DM
Pct
Asp
irin
DM
Pct
BP
Bel
ow13
0
DM
Pct
BP
Bel
ow14
0
DM
Pct
Eye
Exa
m
DM
Pct
Eye
Ref
DM
Pct
Flu
Vac
c
DM
Pct
Foo
tExa
m
DM
Pct
LDLU
nder
100
DM
Pct
LDLU
nder
130
DM
Pct
Mic
roal
b
DM
Pct
Sm
okC
ess
DM
Pct
Tob
acco
Que
ry
DM
Pct
With
A1C
DM
Pct
With
LDL
DM
Pct
SM
Goa
l
DM
Pct
Sta
tin
DM
Pct
Ace
Arb
DM
Pct
Pts
Pne
umo
Measures reported – March 2008
Measures reported – April 2009