Date post: | 16-May-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | truongnhan |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 1 times |
© Copyright by DOOSAN Heavy Industries & Construction Co. 2009
All Rights Reserved.
Younghun Heo, Junghun Lee, Sungho Chung
Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction, Korea
KEPIC/ASME Joint Seminar
Sep. 4-7, 2017
Development of
the Environmental Fatigue Evaluation Technology
for PPG Charging Inlet Nozzle
in Application with RG 1.207
1
Table of Contents
I. Overview of Environmental Fatigue Evaluation
II. Charging Inlet Nozzle Introduction
III. Environmental Fatigue Evaluation
IV. Evaluation Results
V. Conclusion
2
1. Background of Environmental Fatigue Evaluation
I. Overview of Environmental Fatigue Evaluation
1) Fatigue Evaluation in Air Environment
- The ASME Code provides fatigue curve for materials used in nuclear power plant design
- The fatigue curve of the ASME Code is determined by determining the optimum S-N line from
the fatigue test data obtained in the laboratory air environment and then applying
the 2 and 20 adjustment factors to the stress and cycle number.
- The fatigue curve of the ASME Code indirectly corrects the difference between the test environment and
the use environment through the adjustment factor.
2) Fatigue Evaluation in Reactor Coolant Environment
- The coolant environment fatigue test was conducted steadily to check whether the adjustment factors applied to
the ASME Code reflect the environmental impact of the reactor coolant sufficiently.
- From the fatigue test of the coolant environment, the adjustment factor was found to be insufficient,
and the need to improve the design fatigue evaluation was raised.
- The United States approved that regulatory guideline to consider the coolant environment
when evaluating the fatigue of new nuclear power plants.
3
2. Environmental Fatigue Evaluation Method
I. Overview of Environmental Fatigue Evaluation
1) Fatigue Curve Evaluation Method
- The method to calculate partial usage factor directly using fatigue curve reflecting environmental impact.
2) Evaluation Method of Environmental Correction Factor
- The method to calibrate the fatigue life difference between the air environment and the coolant environment
by applying the environmental correction factor instead of using the fatigue curve based on the air environment
Cold Leg (p-5)
SG
RV
Pump
Charging Inlet Nozzle
To RV
From Pump
4
1. Location and Function
II. Charging Inlet Nozzle Introduction
- The primary piping charge inlet nozzle is attached to the cold leg pipe located between the RCP pump and the
reactor vessel and connected to the branch piping of the 2 inch 160 SCH to provide a passage for the fluid entering
the chemical and volume control system.
5
2. Nozzle Characteristic
II. Charging Inlet Nozzle Introduction
- Due to the difference in material and thickness of the nozzle and the safe end, large thermal stress can be
generated by thermal loading.
- There are many events with severe thermal hydraulic curve.
Sefe End
Nozzle
6
1. Regulatory Requirements and Technical Standards
III. Environmental Fatigue Evaluation
1) USNRC RG 1.207
- US regulatory guidelines that require consideration of coolant environmental impacts in
equipment and piping fatigue evaluations within reactor coolant pressure boundaries.
- The environmental fatigue evaluation should be performed by applying S-N curve and
Environmental Fatigue Correction Factor(Fen) correlation equations presented in NUREG/CR-6909 and
fatigue evaluation procedure described in ASME B&PV Code Section III Subsection NB.
2) NUREG/CR-6909
- In February 2007, the USNRC published a report on the major environmental impact factors
affecting fatigue damage in the reactor coolant environment, the Fen correlation equations and detailed
derivation process, and overall environmental fatigue evaluation methods and procedures.
- Use the S-N curve and environmental correction factor(Fen) correlation equation for each material
presented in Appendix A of NUREG / CR-6909 for environmental fatigue evaluation
as specified in RG 1.207.
7
1. Regulatory Requirements and Technical Standards (Con’t)
III. Environmental Fatigue Evaluation
3) ASME P&PV Code Section III
- The method for calculating the air usage factor during the environmental fatigue evaluation is
the same as the fatigue evaluation method and procedure of the existing ASME B & PV Code
Section III Subsection NB-3000 except for the S-N curve.
PRIMARY + SECONDARY STRESS
STRESS CONCENTRATION FACTOR PEAK STRESS
STRESS DIFFERENCE
ALTERNATING STRESS INTENSITIES
MULTIPLY E RATIO
ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF CYCLE
CALCULATE USAGE FACTOR U < 1 END
8
1. Regulatory Requirements and Technical Standards (Con’t)
III. Environmental Fatigue Evaluation
4) Reference Technical Standards
- RG 1.207 and NUREG / CR-6909 provide the Fen correlation equations and the overall calculation procedure,
but there is no detailed method for determining the main variables of the Fen correlation equations,
so refer to the results of ASME and EPRI R & D activities for detailed methodology .
ASME Strain Rate Code Case : Detailed method for determining strain rate as a parameter of Fen correlation
equation
EPRI Report-1025823(Guidelines for Addressing Environmental Effects in Fatigue Usage Calculations) : Applying
method for Fen to dynamic load
9
2. Geometry and Cut Information of Charging Inlet Nozzle
III. Environmental Fatigue Evaluation
918
840
762
761
756
754
753
743
713
672
671
706
716
752
732
712
696
690 768
846
852
868
888
908
689
686
667
557
469
582
474 402
342
258
78
24
6
12
18
1 7 13 73
253
337 397
668
1
PIPING CHARGING INLET NOZZLE (3-D)
1
CVCS CHARGING INLET NOZZLE
10
3. Finite Element Model
III. Environmental Fatigue Evaluation
1) Stress calculation model by pressure : 3-D Plane Symmetric Model
2) Stress calculation model by thermal load : 2-D Axisymmetric Model
11
4. Applied Loads
III. Environmental Fatigue Evaluation
1) Pressure and Thermal Load : Thermal Hydraulic Curve in Transients
T/H data examples
Proprietary Information
12
4. Applied Loads (Cont’d)
III. Environmental Fatigue Evaluation
2) Mechanical load : Main and branch piping reaction force against thermal expansion,
earthquake, dynamic load
Proprietary Information
Sefe End
(S/S)
Nozzle
(C/S)
Clad
(S/S)
Sefe End
(Ni-Cr-Fe)
Nozzle
(C/S)
Clad
(Ni-Cr-Fe)
Material of Case 1 Material of Case 2
13
5. Applicable Meterial
III. Environmental Fatigue Evaluation
1) Nozzle and Cold Leg Pipe : Carbon Steel
2) Safe end and Clad
- Case 1 : Stainless Steel
- Case 2 : Ni-Cr-Fe Alloy
14
2. 환경피로해석 절차 (계속)
III. Environmental Fatigue Evaluation
Alternating stress intensity (Salt) calculation
(ASME Code Sec III. procedure)
Partial usage factor (Ui) calculation
(CR-6909/S-N Curve)
Environmental correction factor (Fen) calculation
(Fen : CR-6909)
(έ : Strain Rate Code Case)
Environmental fatigue usage factor(Uen)
(Uen= ∑ Ui x Fen)
NUREG/CR-6909
(a) Carbon Steel
Fen,i = [exp (0.632 - 0.101S*T*0*έ*)]
(c) Low Alloy Steel
Fen,i = [exp (0.702 - 0.101S*T*0*έ*)]
(b) Austenitic Stainless Steels (wrought and cast)
Fen,i = [exp (0.734 - T*0*έ*)]
(c) Ni-Cr-Fe Alloys
Fen,i = [exp (-T*0*έ*)]
Strain Rate Code Case, Rev.18
Includes detailed procedures to determine Strain Rate
15
IV. Evaluation Results
1. Comparison of Safe end Environmental Fatigue Analysis Results
Result of Case 1 Result of Case 2
16
IV. Evaluation Results
1. Comparison of Safe end Environmental Fatigue Analysis Results (Cont’d)
Result of Case 1 Result of Case 2
17
IV. Evaluation Results
2. Comparison of Clad Environmental Fatigue Analysis Results
Result of Case 1 Result of Case 2
18
IV. Evaluation Results
2. Comparison of Clad Environmental Fatigue Analysis Results (Cont’d)
Result of Case 1 Result of Case 2
19
IV. Evaluation Results
3. Comparison of Environmental Fatigue Analysis Results for Major Cuts
Criteria Cut CASE 1 CASE 2
Uen
A 1.9374 0.4061
B 2.2934 0.3460
Ec 1.7326 0.5744
Fc 1.5120 0.6744
20
V. Conclusion
1. For the same design load, Ni-Cr-Fe alloys show better thermal conduction and
environmental fatigue correction factor than stainless steel.
2. For the above reasons, if stainless steel is applied to areas where high fatigue is
expected in design considering environmental impact, substitution with Ni-Cr-Fe
alloy may be considered.
As a result of the analysis of environmental fatigue by changing the safe end and clad
material of the charging inlet nozzle, the following conclusions were obtained.