DGDC ANNUAL REPORT 2008
KINGDOM OF BELGIUM
Federal Public ServiceForeign Affairs, Foreign Trade andDevelopment Cooperation
DGDC - Directorate-General for Development Cooperation
A word about the form. This year’s annual report is the first to appear only in a CD version rather than on paper. In addition, we are publishing this report together with a report by BTC, our partner for the implementation of bilateral cooperation. The financial report and the statistical data for 2008 are found, as usual, in the annexes, at least as far as the global DGDC figures go. Other departments also contri-bute to the total Belgian official development assistance (ODA), but these data were not yet all available as we went to press.
Over the next few months, more detailed data will be available to be accessed via the DGDC and BTC websites and via an expanded CD-ROM.
The DGDC 2008 annual report is a publication of the Federal Public Service Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation.
It is available free of charge in French, Dutch and English.
1
Table of conTenTs
Photo on cover and on this page: Novo Mundo
Foreword by Charles Michel,
Minister for Development Cooperation 2
1. International policy context: development agenda under pressure 5
1. Slow progress towards the Millennium Development Goals 7
2. Economic crisis hits poor countries 8
3. High food prices, global shortage 13
4. Climate-sensitive development cooperation 18
2. aid effectiveness 20
1. The international context 23
2. Belgian practice 27
3. Example of a new cooperation programme: Mali 29
4. Example of a new cooperation programme: Niger 31
5. Effective aid and the reality of fragile States 33
6. Managing for results 36
7. Aligning aid on systems in the partner country 39
8. Harmonisation with non-governmental actors 43
9. Effectiveness of multilateral cooperation 46
3. DGDc awareness-raising activities 49
4. annexes 53
1.BelgianOfficialDevelopmentAssistance(ODA)2004-2008 54
2. Multi-year bilateral obligations and budget aid 56
3.Multi-yearNGOprogrammesapprovedin2008 58
organization chart 62
abbreviations 65
2
1foreword
Global poverty remains a stubborn and multi-faceted phenomenon.
The world of international cooperation is therefore in constant evolution,
looking for the most effective approach in order to deliver results and
make a sustainable impact on poverty. Belgian Development Cooperation
is resolutely committed to this dynamic. Last year was a year of extensive
consultations, various shifts, and a catch-up movement in terms of bilat-
eral programmes.
Our aim in this annual report is to show this evolution, and also, above
all, to spotlight the results of the work. That is easier said than done.
We tend all too often to make an annual report into an account of
activities: to show all that we have done, and how much money we have
spent.
What we are more keen to do, as we did last year, is to paint a picture
of what effects and what results we are achieving with our coopera-
tion. Obviously, what ultimately counts is the longer-term results on the
ground: after all, every type of development cooperation seeks at the
end of the day to improve living conditions for the poorest population
groups, who stand in greatest need. But this often requires many inter-
mediate steps. Donor countries should no longer attempt to make that
difference on the ground themselves. Our partner countries, with their
policy officials, their population and their institutions, are responsible
themselves and they have to own the development process. That means
that if we are to be genuinely effective in the longer term, we have to
adapt the way in which we cooperate, and sometimes to overhaul it
radically. In that sense, too, within our own administration and in our
relations with the various actors in cooperation, lessons have been
learned and results achieved about which we want to report.
33
Yet development cooperation does not operate in a vacuum. We have
observed major shifts over the past year in other policy areas - financial/
economic, climate, food prices. These are all crises with a major impact,
both on our partner countries’ scope for development and on develop-
ment cooperation budgets. Here, too, we want to linger for a moment
in this annual report and explain how we react to this with development
cooperation.
All of which means that this annual report is not just a backwards look, a
way of logging what has been done in the past, but also an invitation to
go the extra mile, to do better and to do more, for the challenges in the
short and medium term are huge.
There are various deadlines facing us in the next few years, by which
Belgium will have to account for the implementation of a number of
principles and declarations to which we have signed up.
In 2010, our cooperation will be examined by the Development Assistance
Committee of the OECD. This will entail the entire policy, the procedures
and the development programmes being submitted to a peer review by
two other members of this international organisation. In 2010, Belgium
will also be holding the European Presidency: a perfect opportunity to
drive the development agenda forward. In 2011 we will have to publi-
cise the progress we have achieved in the implementation of the Paris
Declaration and the Accra Action Programme on aid effectiveness, and
finally, in 2015, the world is awaiting the achievement of the Millennium
Development Goals.
Charles MICHEL
Minister for Development Cooperation
InTernaTIonale beleIDsconTexT:
onTwIkkelInGsaGenDa onDer Druk
1
4
55
1. Slow progress towards the Millennium Development Goals
2. Economic crisis hits poor countries
3. High food prices, global shortage
4. Climate-sensitive development cooperation
InTernaTIonal polIcy conTexT: DevelopmenT
aGenDa unDer pressure
1
© Béatrice Petit
66
In this chapter, the annual report focuses specifically on the consequences
of the crisis year of 2008 for developing countries. belgium has also made
efforts to mitigate the negative effects of the economic and financial crisis
for the developing countries.
7
1 InTernaTIonal polIcy conTexT: DevelopmenT
aGenDa unDer pressure
1. slow progress towards the millennium Development Goals
2008 was a turbulent year. While the world was com-
pletely focused on the risks of climate change for the
South, we were buffeted by first a food and energy
crisis and then a serious economic recession. The
urgency of the unfolding events was one of the main
features shaping the world’s development agenda in
2008.
But the international community continued to work
steadily through it all. The achievement of the
millennium Development Goals (MDG for short)
by 2015 remains the most important policy frame-
work. UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon released
an MDG report in September 2008 which stated that
the progress being achieved is inadequate. According
to the report, the poverty goal is likely, globally
speaking, to be attained (thanks to strong economic
growth in China and India), although by no means in
every country. The gender and education goals are
not likely to be met globally, but there is often still
some progress being made. The biggest disappoint-
ment is the lack of progress on infant and maternal
mortality, and there still remains a major slippage
between progress actually made and what was
planned in terms of water and sanitary services.
A more detailed analysis reveals that progress is
uneven across the various regions: most regions are
posting solid progress, although the pace is not quick
enough to be able to reach the 2015 target date.
Moreover, the report expresses anxiety at the growing
internal inequalities, even within countries achieving a
good average. The gulf between rich and poor has
actually increased in many countries. Every year,
DGDC drafts a specific MDG report for Parliament. This
is available in French and in Dutch at www.dgdc.be.
1. Eradicate extreme
poverty and hunger
2. Achieve universal
primary education
3. Promote gender equality
and empower women
4. Reduce child mortality
5. Improve maternal health
6. Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and
other diseases
7. Ensure environmental
sustainability
8. Develop a global partnership
for development
8
1Middle-income countries appear to be hit harder by
the economic crisis than low-income countries, be-
cause they are more strongly integrated in the world
economy and the financial markets. However, low-in-
come countries have fewer resources and a lower ca-
pacity to cope with the crisis. It is clear that the crisis
is afflicting all developing countries, even the very
poorest, which are virtually completely absent from
the financial markets.
Belgium’s 18 partner countries for governmental development cooperation
Lower growth
World economic growth declined sharply because
of the financial and economic crisis. Although poor
countries do not have much of a stake on the inter-
national financial markets, they do still feel the
effects of the crisis. The consequences vary widely,
depending on a country’s economic situation, its
exposure to risks and its problem-solving abilities.
2. economic crisis hits poor countries
‘TyPES’ oF CouNTRyTheWorldBankclassifieseconomiesaccordingtotheirGrossNationalIncome(GNI)percapita.Thisisthe
basis that the Bank uses when determining the arrangements and conditions for the granting of loans.
low-income countries: a GNI per capita of less than 936 uS dollars. Eleven of the 18 partner countries for
Belgian Development Cooperation are low-income countries.
lower middle income countries: aGNIpercapitaofbetween936and3,705USdollars.Thepartnercoun-
tries Algeria, Bolivia, Ecuador, the Palestinian Territories, Peru and Morocco belong to this group.
upper middle income countries: aGNIpercapitaofbetween3,706and11,455USdollars.SouthAfricais
the only partner country in this group.
High-income countries: countries with a GNI per capita of over 11,455 uS dollars. Belgium is in this category.
Source: World Bank, 2009 (figures based on GNI per capita 2007)
12
35 4
6
789
15
16
17
10
13
12
11
1418
North Africa : 1. Morocco2. Algeria
Latin America :15. Ecuador16. Peru17. Bolivia
Middle East :14. Palestinian Territories
13. South Africa
West Africa : 3. Mali4. Niger5. Senegal6. Benin
Central Africa :7. DR of Congo8. Rwanda9. Burundi
East Africa :10. Uganda11. Tanzania12. Mozambique
Asia18. Vietnam
9
The following four consequences of the crisis hit the developing countries hard:
1. Trade declines. Many countries in the South
depend on the export of raw materials. The economic
recession meant sharp falls in the prices of a number
of raw materials in the second half of 2008. In par-
ticular, oil and metal ore prices went into freefall.
Developing countries with significant raw material
exports have seen their incomes collapse; export
demand is also falling because the industrialised
countries are placing fewer orders.
TCX – INNoVATIVE FINANCING IN THE LoCAL CuRRENCyFinancial crises demonstrate the impact of the
exchange risks that hamstring entrepreneurs and
local banks in developing countries. The famous
hyper-devaluations of the late Nineties illustrate
thecatastrophicconsequencesforfinancial
systems and economies. Many businesses were no
longer able to repay their loans because they had
become exorbitantly expensive.
The Currency Exchange Fund(TCX),intendedto
promote investments in local currencies, offers a
solution to this problem. The fund can take on the
exchange risks formerly shouldered by the local
entities without putting their expansion on the
line. This means that institutions are no longer ex-
posed to risks that they cannot handle themselves.
The belgian Investment company for Developing
countries(BIO)invested10milliondollarsinTCX.
The fund is unique of its kind. TCX aims to drasti-
cally curb the risk of non-payment by businesses,
and to make a robust contribution to the develop-
ment of the local capital markets. TCX was origi-
nally an initiative by the Netherlands Financing
CompanyforDevelopingCountries(FMO),inwhich
several bilateral and multilateral institutions hold a
stake.
www.tcxfund.com
2. Investments dry up. Developing countries are
regarded by investors as being more risky than
industrialised countries, and in addition, there is a
clear reduction in North-South investment move-
ments. Confidence has evaporated. Banks and invest-
ment funds are strapped for cash. Investments in the
developing countries in 2007 amounted to some
1 trillion dollars, the equivalent of 8% of global GDP.
By 2008, the investment flow had halved to 500 bil-
lion dollars.
1010
BELGIuM IS CoNTINuING To AIM FoR The0.7%STANDArDBelgium decided to meet the united Nations stand-
ardby2010.Thisstandardlaysdownthatthe
industrialisedcountriesmustdedicate0.7%oftheir
grossnationalincome(GNI)todevelopmentco-
operation. This decision was enshrined in a law in
2002,makingBelgiummoreambitiousthantheeU,
whichhasset2015asthetargetdateforachieving
the0.7%standard.
Thisgrowthcurvewassustaineduntil2005.In
2006and2007,federalspendingondevelopment
cooperation stalled, and in addition the period of
exceptionally high debt relief operations came to
anend.Thismeantadropintotalofficialassist-
ance for development cooperation, both in Belgium
and in the other member countries of the oECD
Development Committee.
To counter this negative trend, the government
decided to raise the DGDc budgetfor2008to
1.11billioneuro,anincreaseof244millioneuro(or
28%comparedto2007expenditures).Theamount
budgeted was entirely spent. When drawing up the
2009budget,thegrowthdynamicwasconfirmed:
3. remittances decrease. Migrants are the most
important bridge between developing countries and
the rest of the world. Between them, they send more
money back to their countries of origin (in remittances)
than the entire development cooperation budget
across all donors. But the crisis means that these
figures have fallen. Migrants are losing their jobs, or
the cost of living is rising steeply. So that knocks on
to their families back at home.
despitethedifficultbudgetarysituation,theDGDC
budgetroseby252millioneuro(almost23%)to
1.362 billion euro.
The total Belgian official development assistance
(oDa) includes
spending on the DGDC budget, ■
the development spending of Foreign Affairs, ■
Finances and some other federal public services
(FPSs),
the debt relief operations by the National ■
DelcredereOffice(whichisapublicinstitutionthat
insures export businesses against all manner of
riskssuchasnon-payment,coupsd’état,etc),
some spending by the communities, regions, ■
provinces and municipalities.
For2008,totalODAwasestimatedat0.47%ofGNI
(aprovisionalfigure),comparedto0.43%in2007.
The surge in DGDC spending was to some extent
offset by a further drop in debt relief operations.
4. Development aid is threatening to fall. After
investments and remittances, development aid is the
third biggest monetary flow to the poor countries.
But the aid budget is being squeezed. It is one of the
most striking effects of this crisis. In recent years,
many donor countries promised to spend more on
development aid. This might prove to have been no
more than words, now that there is a greater ten-
dency to tighten the purse-strings. The consequences
would be particularly dramatic for sub-Saharan Africa:
almost two thirds of net capital inflow consists of
development aid. In many donor countries, develop-
ment aid is pegged to national income. When the
economy shrinks, it would mean an automatic drop in
the aid budget.
1111
belgian poverty reduction partnership.
This is a programme that Belgium has been
financing at the World Bank since 2000. Trough
this programme, Belgium supports, inter alia, 10
partner countries (Senegal, Mali, Niger, Benin,
Uganda, Burundi, Rwanda, DR Congo, Tanzania and
Mozambique) in drafting and implementing their
strategies to combat poverty, for this World Bank
contribution is used to finance ‘poverty economists’
expertise in these countries. The programme was
evaluated in 2006. The positive results formed the
basis for a new phase in the programme.
In Mozambique, as an example, such expertise is
closely aligned on the ‘General budgetary aid’
programme that Belgium supported for several years
(see chapter 2, p. 40), which was linked to the reform
of public finances. The expert supported the Ministry
of Planning and Development in exploring the effects
of the policy to combat poverty.
Belgium and the World Bank
In order to tackle the consequences of the credit
crisis, the World Bank extended an extra 100 billion
dollars in 2008 for traditional loans to middle-income
countries. The Bank also reserved an extra 42 billion
dollars for loans at favourable conditions to low-
income countries. The poorest countries could rely on
an emergency loan of up to 2 billion dollars, over the
long term and with no interest.
Belgian development cooperation in 2008 had about
195 million euro available for the World Bank, money
that was deployed as both voluntary and mandatory
contributions. These funds financed the following
programmes, among others:
© IFAD / R. Grossman
InTernaTIonale beleIDsconTexT:
onTwIkkelInGsaGenDa onDer Druk
1
12
fast Track Initiative (fTI). The objective of this
initiative is to make faster progress in the field of
universal basic education in the low-income coun-
tries (MDG 2 and 3). Donors pledge through the FTI
that every partner country can work out a credible
national plan for universal, high-quality lower educa-
tion. They supply the financial resources for this plan.
A fund helps the partner country to bridge education
spending until the bilateral donors come on board
with their own support. Since 2003, Belgium has
been participating in the financing of this FTI fund
via an annual voluntary contribution of 1 million euro.
In Vietnam, this dovetails closely with the sectoral
budgetary aid that Belgium awards.
The development marketplace for african
Diaspora in europe. D-MADE stimulates people
from the African diaspora (living in Europe) to set up
businesses in their home countries. D-MADE gave
16 African entrepreneurs the opportunity in 2008
to set up a business in their homeland. In this way,
almost 1 million dollars is to be invested in 11 African
countries. Over 500 businesses have filed a business
proposal. Among the prize-winners were also three
African entrepreneurs from Belgium with a project to
brew beer from sorghum for Burkina Faso, a project
to extract biofuel from jatropha in Cote d’Ivoire and
an ethical publicity project for Mali and Burkina Faso.
© World Bank / Simone D. McCourtie
© Béatrice Petit
13
Humanitarian actions
The humanitarian actions are directed towards the pro-
vision of food aid in the event of shortages. The aim is
to alleviate need in the short term. belgian food aid
is largely delivered via the World Food Programme
(WFP), the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO)
and the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for
Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA). In ad-
dition, food aid is also distributed via non-govern-
mental organisations. Spending on food aid in 2008
amounted to 22.1 million euro.
Belgium also plays a driving role on the international
forum and is an advocate for unconditional food aid
in cash, in other words without the obligation to buy
the food in the donor country. Belgium also lobbies
at the WFP and the FAO for the purchase of food
(aid) from local farmers’ organisations and on local
markets (see text box on P4P). At Belgium’s instiga-
tion, the WFP has taken a decision along those lines
regarding its purchasing policy.
Food security under pressure
2008 had yet another crisis in store, which brought
high food prices and a global food shortage. From
Bangladesh and Haiti to Ethiopia, food riots broke
out. The World Health Organisation quotes a figure
of 178 million children suffering from malnutrition in
2008. In the light of the first Millennium Development
Goal (to halve extreme poverty and hunger by 2015),
this is a painful statistic to have to record.
Although ‘agriculture and food security’ has long
been among the five priority sectors for Belgian
development cooperation, Belgium has still decided
to further boost its efforts in the future: by 2010,
10% of the total aid budget must be devoted to
agriculture and food security. This percentage
must be raised to 15% by 2015. In the 7 Indicative
Cooperation Programmes agreed in 2008 (see below,
chapter 2), 5 partner countries (Benin, Bolivia, Mali,
Niger and Mozambique) chose ‘agriculture and rural
development’ as a priority sector.
In order to be able to guarantee food security,
Belgium has a two-pronged policy: humanitarian
actions and structural interventions.
‘HIGHer fooD prIces DurInG 2008 alone may Have IncreaseD THe number of cHIlDren sufferInG permanenT coGnITIve or pHysIcal Injury Due To malnuTrITIon by 44 mIllIon’
(WOrlDBANk,GlOBAleCONOMICPrOSPeCTS2009)
3. High food prices, global shortage
InTernaTIonale beleIDsconTexT:
onTwIkkelInGsaGenDa onDer Druk
1
14
organises food purchases, in line with the logic of
local purchasing.
Belgiandevelopmentcooperationin2008released
557,500eurofortheP4PprojectintheDemocratic
republicofCongo.ThismadeBelgiumthefirst
country to actively back the P4P reform initiative.
So as the pioneer, Belgium has also brought about
a multiplier effect.
P4Pwillberolledoutin20pilotcountriesinAfrica
and Central America over the next 5 years. At least
350,000localfarmerswillgaineasieraccesstore-
liable markets, where they can sell their goods for
honest, competitive prices.
P4P – BELGIuM’S PIoNEERING STANCE IN THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST THE FooD CRISISone of the spearheads of Belgian policy is the
purchaseoffood(aid)onlocalmarkets,inorder
to strengthen their development. For example,
Belgium has for some years been stimulating the
purchase of corn and beans from the local farmers
inNorthkivu(DrCongo).
Thanks to persistent efforts at international
level, Belgian policy has garnered a following.
InSeptember2008,theWorldFoodProgramme
launched the revolutionary ‘purchase for
progress’ (p4p) initiative. The aim of this initia-
tive is to radically reform the way in which the WFP
© FAO
15
‘THe THInG Is To allocaTe funDs for researcH InTo susTaInable aGrIculTural meTHoDs, because worlD fooD proDucTIon may InDeeD Have alreaDy reacHeD ITs peak’.
oLIVIER DE SCHuTTER, uN SPECIAL RAPPoRTEuR
ONTherIGhTTOFOODSINCe1MAy2008
Structural interventions
Of at least equal importance are the structural inter-
ventions designed to increase and improve food
production. Where food aid serves to react urgently
to a food shortage, structural interventions need to
prevent such shortages. The belgian survival fund (BSF)
has been specially set up to improve food security in the
poorest African countries with the help of long-term
projects. This fund was established in 1999 at the
initiative of Parliament – what it is, in fact, is the suc-
cessor to an older parliamentary initiative. Projects
by the Survival Fund seek to take an integrated ap-
proach to food security: alongside initiatives to im-
prove or increase food production, account is also
taken of such issues as health, sanitation, training
and institutional reinforcement.
A striking example of a project to promote food
security, backed by the Belgian Survival Fund, has
been carried out in Eastern Tigray, in the north of
ethiopia. As a consequence of recurrent droughts, a
desperately degraded environment and border con-
flicts, the area is under constant threat from food
shortages.
The results have been impressive. Over 10,000
households have been reached by the project.
Traditionally, women were not allowed to cultivate
the land. Training and awareness-raising activities in
the communities helped overcome the taboo, and 391
women with sole responsibility for their families are
now tilling their own land themselves.
The short rainy season normally allows no more than
one crop a year, but thanks to irrigation, farmers can
now tend a small vegetable plot, where they can
harvest up to 3 times a year. The vegetables also
form a valuable supplement to the traditional diet.
After 2 years, there were already 519 vegetable plots
under cultivation.
Finally, the quality and productivity of the local
livestock (cattle) was improved, without having to
increase the actual number of animals. This was
achieved by feeding them more, improving veterinary
services and making available good breeding stock. In
the meantime, 486 calves from the improved strain
have already been born.
The BSF was subjected to a thorough evaluation last
year, from which lessons were drawn for a new multi-
year programme (see chapter 2, p. 37).
A second form of structural intervention takes the form
of support to the agricultural sector, via bilateral,
multilateral and indirect cooperation. An example of
this is the increased funding for international
agricultural research via the Consultative Group on
International Agricultural Research (CGIAR). This con-
sultative group links donors to agricultural research
institutions and supports agricultural research to
the benefit of the poor. The research institutions are
specialised and between them cover pretty much all
the important food plants and crops for developing
countries (fish-farming and livestock, rice, potatoes,
corn, bananas, etc), as well as broader themes such
as biodiversity and deforestation.
© DGOS / Jean-Yves Standaert
InTernaTIonale beleIDsconTexT:
onTwIkkelInGsaGenDa onDer Druk
1
16
multiplytheAzawakcattlebreed.Theobjective
is that as many people as possible from Menaka
become owners of the cattle as a guarantee for
food security and against poverty. This demands
a shift of mindset in order to change both the aim
and the methods in stock-breeding, certainly after
the succession of droughts. The farmers are slowly
beginning to get away from the idea that their
survival depends simply on owning animals. The
quality of the upkeep, care for the production and
the preservation of the environment are becoming
moreimportantobjectives.
TheprojecthasmadethegrowthoftheAzawak
cattle breed possible once again, after it had vir-
tually died out in the region as a result of drought
and other problems. The general conditions for
cattlebreedinghavebeenimproved(intermsof
feedingandhealth)andmilkproductionisback
on stream. Progress is also expected once the co-
operative organisations are set up. In the current
phase, efforts are being made to concentrate on
genetic improvement and upgrading production
and incomes from raising cattle.
In niger,Belgiumissupportingtheprojectforthe
‘promotion and dissemination of the red-coated
Maradi goat’. These goats are bred by the women
in the region. This action is designed to increase
At bilateral level, there is renewed interest in
the agricultural sector in the new multi-year pro-
grammes with the partner countries. These include
awholestringofprojectsandprogrammes.here
are a few examples:
In benin, Belgium is very active in the improvement
of agricultural productivity. Various programmes
provide aid to the government in implementing this
strategy.OnesuchprojectisPAMrAD,thesupport
projectfortheruralcommunityintheAtacoraand
Dongadepartments.Theaimofthisprojectistake
a sustainable approach to food security and in-
crease yields for the farmers by promoting crops
other than cotton. These include rice, vegetables,
cashew nuts and crops with a short cycle. The ini-
tial results were rather patchy. By focusing more
on institutional reinforcement and less on the
production itself, the effects on yields were pretty
minimal. And after all, higher yields are crucial for
sustainable food security. But more income can
be made from the vegetable crops if the problems
with storage and sales can be tackled, and that
calls for stronger organisations. Compelling results
have been achieved in the area of production
control and marketing of the cashew nuts.
In mali, Belgium is supporting the development of
livestock-raisingwithaprojecttoselectand
© Béatrice Petit
17
the incomes of the female goat-breeders by
improving the productivity of the goats. The pro-
visional result is an increase in that productivity
and therefore in the incomes, meaning that the
women’s autonomy is being strengthened.
In Tanzania,Belgiumissupportingtheprojectfor
the sustainable improvement of banana growing.
Theprojectseekstoraiseincomesinthekagera
areaandthekibondodistrict,andtoguarantee
food security. This requires a reinforcement of in-
stitutional capacity and public-private cooperation,
so that the innovations in growing methods can be
sustainablydisseminated.Inthefirstphaseofthe
project,theintroductionofsomesuperiorbanana
varieties has made for increased productivity. This
has delivered alternative incomes, bringing to life the
bananaproduct(wine,beer,chips,flour)processing
and marketing sector. 2.5 million of these banana
varieties have now been planted. This has had a
positiveeffectonprofits,butalsoontheenviron-
ment(soilandbiodiversity).Atthesametime,this
projecthashadasnowballeffectonotherfarmers
who were not involved in it.
© Vets without frontiers
18
Climate change has a direct impact on development
actions. According to the World Bank, no fewer than
one quarter of its projects are running a significant
risk of damage because of the adverse effects of
climate change. A study by the OECD has shown that
in some areas, this figure may be as high as 65%.
These are sobering statistics. Accordingly, Belgian
Development Cooperation staged a conference
in March 2008 called ‘Climate change and Belgian
development cooperation policy: challenges and
possibilities’.
The concluding item in this conference was a report
by the Belgian professor of climatology jean-pascal
van ypersele. The report speaks of the ‘fundamen-
tal injustice of climate change’. While responsibility
for global warming lies mainly with the developed
countries, it is the poor countries that are feeling its
most negative consequences. In addition, they are
least equipped with the resources to adapt to it.
The answer to climate change is a combination of
two thrusts: mitigation and adaptation.
mitigation includes measures designed to reduce
the emission of greenhouse gases: ‘greener’ trans-
port,low-carbonindustry,energyefficiency,etc.
adaptation refers to interventions which limit the
consequences of climate change for our society:
buildingdams,reversingdesertification,drought-
resistant seeds and suitable agricultural methods,
etc.
■
A CLIMATE TEST FoR EVERy PRojECT annemarie van der avort is the new climate
officeratDGDC,wheresheworkstostrengthen
multilateral environmental programmes. This is her
snapshot of the situation.
How much progress has DGDc made with inte-
grating climate-sensitive thinking?
“A Climate Task Force has been set up with repre-
sentatives from DGDC, BTC and the Minister’s
cabinet. Its remit is to convert the recommenda-
tions in the climate report into concrete actions.
Thefirstactionhasbeentosetupanenvironment/
climate unit within our service. The task force has
set up a Climate Action Plan, on the basis of pro-
fessor van ypersele’s 13 recommendations.”
Jean-Pascal van Ypersele delivers his climate report to Minister Charles Michel
(© DGDC / Dimitri Ardelean)
4. climate-sensitive development cooperation
1919
which recommendations from the report will be
quite easy to implement, and which will be a lot
harder?
“of the 13 recommendations, there are two which
we have already been working on in the past few
years. We have built up a fair body of expertise
around sustainable forest management. We have
builtupexperiencewithrenewableenergyprojects
in places such as Rwanda. We have also engaged
in some groundwork for a policy on biofuels. What
is harder to do is to further raise and redirect the
development cooperation budget. When we carry
out bilateral cooperation, where the principle of
ownership is a central plank, there has to be a
demand for such a reorientation from the partner
country. So the ball is not always in DGDC’s court.
In2007,DGDCdevotedabout5%ofitstotalbudget
tospecificactivitiesdedicatedtotacklingclimate
change.”
In the first phase, the new projects will be sub-
jected to a climate test, but the test is intended
for all projects. What is the likelihood that
current projects will have to be cut back because
they are not sufficiently climate-friendly?
“Theaimistotakeeveryprojectandexaminewhat
itneedsinthewayofadjustments.TheClimate
Task Force would love it if the budgets for de-
velopment cooperation were to allow for making
projectsclimateproof.Butthisisapoliticalchoice,
one that has to be validated by our partners in the
South.”
what is in the pipeline for 2009?
“We are organising training for the DGDC staff.
This internal awareness-raising should hopefully
allowustoincludethefightagainstclimatechange
as a transverse theme in Belgian Development
Cooperation, for example when drawing up future
IndicativeCooperationProgrammes(ICPs)with
the partner countries. obviously there are also
the climate negotiations, including ‘CoP 15’ in
Copenhagen,themajorclimatesummitfordrawing
upapost-kyotoprotocol.Oneverytangibleaction
will be the offsetting of the Co2 emissions from the
DGDCstaff’sflights.”
4. climate-sensitive development cooperation
Belgium supports the ‘Programme to preserve
biodiversity in World Heritage Sites’ in Dr congo.
This programme was set up by uNESCo, the Institut
Congolais pour la Conservation de la Nature(ICCN)
and specialist NGos. The programme allows the
protectionoffivesites,eachofwhichhasveryhigh
biodiversity. A number of pilot actions to conserve
them have already been conducted, in order to
increase the involvement of the local communities
in this programme. The ICCN is being reinforced
in its monitoring capacities. Some urgent action
plans also arose for the cleaning-up of the National
Parks.
In bolivia, Belgium is supporting a programme for
integral forest management in the tropical forests
around Cochabamba. The anticipated result from
the programme needs to be more than the simple
reforestation of the pieces of forest used.
It should lead to communal, sustainable manage-
ment by the local communities. They are being
trained to grow new plants, and to manage smaller
and larger tracts of forest in an ecological way.
(© Béatrice Petit)
20
21
aID effecTIveness2
1. The international context
2. Belgian practice
3. Example of a new cooperation programme: Mali
4. Example of a new cooperation programme: Niger
5. Effective aid and the reality of fragile States
6. Managing for results
7. Aligning aid on systems in the partner country
8. Harmonisation with non-governmental actors
9. Effectiveness of multilateral cooperation
(© Béatrice Petit)
22
The Millennium Declaration by the United Nations gave the first description
of the mutual obligations of both donor and beneficiary countries.
The declaration also gave the eight concrete millennium Goals to be
achieved by 2015 (see chapter 1). In 2002, these countries met again in
Monterey, Mexico, to flesh out a global partnership for development.
They also discussed the question of the financing of the plan.
But it is not just a matter of quantity. Because these funding currents were
supposed to have an impact on the fundamental aspects of the problem -
access for the world’s poorest to elementary rights – it was also necessary
to put in place some qualitative rules. This was the subject of international
meetings which led in 2005 to the ‘paris Declaration’ on aid effectiveness.
In this second chapter, the annual report goes into more detail on some
aspects of this agenda for more effective aid.
23
The Paris Declaration
The paris Declaration laid down five principles
which combine to determine the effectiveness. They
stem from the general observation that development
cooperation was not productive, being based upon
good intentions, but riven from below by conflict and
individual interests.
The five principles are:
1. ownership: The developing countries must exer-
cise effective leadership over their development
policies and carry out development plans.
2. alignment: Donors base their overall support on
partner countries’ national development strategies.
Funding must be channelled via the partner
countries’ financial systems.
3. Harmonisation: Effectiveness also means that
the donor countries co-ordinate and complement
their actions, instead of all trying to carry on acting
independently.
4. managing for results: Results must be presented
in order to be able to account for spending.
5. mutual accountability: From now on, there is
talk of a partnership in which each party is account-
able vis-à-vis the other.
The Accra Action Programme
A wide gulf persisted between the intentions
expressed in the Paris Declaration and the actual im-
plementation by the States and other actors. Donor
co-ordination ensures a loss of individual visibility by
being subsumed into the whole, something that is
difficult to accept and dampens enthusiasm.
1. The international context
In September 2008, therefore, a meeting was organ-
ised in Accra, Ghana. The aim was to reinvigorate the
Declaration and press for faster application of the
principles it had enunciated. Some specially adapted
measures and new deadlines were now to strengthen
the Paris Declaration. By 2011, a new report is
expected on the extent to which each party has lived
up to these promises.
The Accra Action Programme contains recommenda-
tions which Belgium and the other OECD countries
have to integrate into their development cooperation.
This assumes an unavoidable change in behaviour so
that every country can convert these political inten-
tions into reality on the ground. This entails, inter
alia, the following:
less geographical and thematic spread, ■
focus on those countries and sectors where ■
expertise and competences have been built up,
more co-ordination with other bilateral or multi- ■
lateral donors,
making more use of the existing systems in the ■
partner countries themselves, accompanied by
support measures to reform the local institutions
and education systems,
predictability of the aid, ■
better co-ordination with all parties involved ■
within development cooperation, each one within
its own borders and procedures.
In other words, Accra seeks to ensure that both
partner and donor countries abide by the promises:
we want more, better and faster.
2424
THe True crITerIon for assessInG THe effecTIveness of aID Is THe ImprovemenT of THe lIvInG sTanDarD of peoples.
SUrveyIN2006ONTheFOllOW-UPTOThePArISDeClArATION,
SUMMAryOFThereSUlTS,OeCD2007
THE RESuLTS ARE ALWAyS SHAREDInterview with Marc Denys,
Director of Bilateral Cooperation
On1December2008,MarcDenysbecamethe
new director of the bilateral cooperation direc-
torate.Thisishisfirstjobattheheadquartersin
Brussels,aftersome31yearsoutinthefield.he
beganhiscareerinAfricaasajunioragricultural
researcher for the FAo, and he has now returned
from uganda, where as Attaché for International
Cooperation his roles included chairing the donor
groups on ‘health policy’ and ‘decentralisation’.
The emphasis in international development
thinking and action is now on effectiveness.
so was that not the case before?
Thefirstchangethatensuredamuchmoresystem-
atic and focused approach had already emerged
twenty or so years ago, when we began to use a
methodologicalframeworkatprojectlevel.But
eventhemostmeticulouslydevisedprojects
remained much too isolated, set up by donors, run
by donors, evaluated by donors. once the foreign
staff were no longer there, things all too often fell
apart, without any impact, without any transfer.
Even when foreign aid providers were employed
by a ministry in a partner country, there was too
little transfer and interaction. At that time, the
education programmes for the competent ministry
in Rwanda were set up by foreign advisers. They
also set the examinations, and corrected them. It
wasjusttheactualteachingthatwasdispensedby
Rwandan teachers, and sometimes not even that.
yousawthatapproachreflectedinthestaffpolicy
of what was then the BADC. Cooperation staff
were accredited for periods of one or two years.
you had to be able to demonstrate your own
results for that, to prove yourself. Actually the best
thing was to make yourself indispensable – and
some local staff indeed found that quite easy.
what results stay with you from your long career
on the ground?
There were some undeniable concrete short-term
results, the immediate ‘output’: school buildings,
trainingforstaff,plantingprojectsandsoon,but
they did not lead to lasting change, because they
werenotembeddedinaspecificlocalandnational
plan. The school building made from reinforced
concrete was still standing, but the education did
not improve noticeably. The point is that there was
usuallynospecificpolicyframework.
I see it as being a positive development that we
are now supporting our partner countries in draw-
ing up that policy of their own. The emergence of
homegrown high-quality development plans, in
general and for the various sectors, is a really
important result.
And once that plan is in place, the best way to sup-
port it is with budgetary aid. It is better to stop
allowinganymoreisolatedprojects.everyproject
‘THe scHool buIlDInG maDe from reInforceD concreTe was sTIll sTanDInG, buT THe eDucaTIon DID noT Improve noTIceably’
25
causes distortions, even under the optimum circum-
stances. When you as a donor support a particular
defineddistrict,youcauseanunbalanceddistribu-
tion. Either that one district is given an advantage
compared to others, or the external support is with-
drawnfromthefinancingbyyourowngovernment.
And there is always the temptation to handle the
resourcesofadonorprojectwithlesscarethanif
you have to account for the disbursement of your
own budgets vis-à-vis your own authorities.
but that does assume that there is a functioning
national monitoring and accountability system…
That is exactly what we have to support: the good
sectoral programmes via budgetary aid, and at the
sametime,ifnecessaryviaprojectsandtechnical
assistance, strengthening of the institutions for
planning, monitoring and evaluation. Partner coun-
tries are often not very far into this, partly because
donorshavebeenmonitoringtheirownprojects
themselves for too long. But here, too, I see some
resultsoverthepast10years.InUganda,forex-
ample, there is now a great deal more involvement
by parliament. There is a properly working public
accounts committee which receives reports from
an independent auditor-general and looks at the
responsibility of the State spending and the results
achieved by each ministry, including budgetary aid.
Is the emphasis on ‘results’ not in conflict with
the focus on more co-ordination, harmonisation
and ownership? The better the mutual coopera-
tion, the harder it is to still talk about results
from belgian cooperation?
Managing for results is not a question of plant-
ingourownflag,butofclarityoverwhatwewant
to achieve. As donors, we must understand that
results are shared, and primarily by the partner
country. The fact that we, with various donors,
have supported the development of basic educa-
tion in Tanzania for ten years via budgetary aid has
led to better educational institutions by Tanzania
itself, and to better school results. That is a shared
result. Donors must not formulate these results
themselves, but must take them over from the
partner country. Partner countries must be able to
develop their own indicators. We must encourage
the conducts of baseline studies.
How, then, does the role of belgian develop-
ment cooperation change?
Belgium has become more active in the technical
and political dialogue with the partner country,
and with the other donors. It is far more a matter
of policy work and less about the details of the
implementation.
© World Bank / Scott Wallace
26
In any case, budgetary aid is more a political issue.
you are negotiating with a country about how it
dispenses scarce resources. So budgetary aid is a
huge lever. As a donor group, you can bring pres-
sure to bear when, for example, too much money
is being ploughed into defence, or spending is not
being evenly distributed across the regions. That
is work on the ground that the embassy team has
totakeon–notjusttheattachébutalsotheam-
bassador, and backed by the expertise of BTC. To
acteffectively,thatteamneedstohavesufficient
decision-makingauthorityandtobesufficiently
trained. you need, together with technical experts,
to weigh up whether all policy and monitoring con-
ditions are being met, and the results anticipated
are being achieved, in order to channel another
tranche of 1 or more millions of euros into the
partner country’s budget. That is quite a differ-
ent sort of responsibility, and you have to want to
carry it.
27
In 2008, Belgium, together with various partner
countries, organised a catch-up operation in the
establishment of new cooperation programmes. ICP
stands for Indicative cooperation programme,
which is the most important document in bilateral
cooperation. This document sets out the relationship
between DGDC and every partner country for the
next four years. The ICP follows the priorities of the
poverty reduction plans and the sectoral develop-
ment plans of the country. The document sets out
the priority sectors and the results to be achieved, as
well as the strategy to achieve all this. The ICP is also
used as a basis for Belgian positions in the political
dialogue with the partner country and the co-ordina-
tion process with other donor countries.
When drawing up the new ICPs, Belgium has made
huge efforts to tie them in with the new dynamic
in terms of effective aid. In keeping with the
European Code of Conduct on the distribution of
2. belgian practice
(© DGDC / Dimitri Ardelean)
tasks between donor countries, Belgian Development
Cooperation is to concentrate in future on two
priority sectors in each partner country (with the
exception of the countries in the Central African
region, because of the scale of Belgian Development
Cooperation). Drafting an ICP is a long-haul task,
with various actors involved. This takes place in two
phases: the diagnosis or analysis of the country and
the description of the strategy.
Belgium wants more cooperation between the bilat-
eral programme and the other belgian actors active
in the partner country (NGOs, universities, etc).
Possible partnerships and synergies are being ex-
plored and encouraged, in order to exchange experi-
ences and good practices. Accordingly, the NGOs are
now involved in the Joint Committees in Mali, Niger
and Uganda. In Mali and Uganda, the NGO represent-
atives are invited as observers. Belgium is making
a study fund available in the partner countries. The
partner country can use part of this study fund to
convert the ‘Paris Declaration’ into practice.
Belgium also wants to investigate whether the imple-
mentation of specific actions can be delegated more
to other (bilateral or multilateral) donors. Belgium will
devote approximately 5% of the ICP budget to actions
falling outside the priority sectors. These actions are
indeed directed at important topics such as women’s
rights (issues such as genital mutilation), the environ-
ment, the social economy, the battle against HIV/AIDS
and children’s rights (for instance the battle against
exploitation and trafficking), but also the setting up
of businesses and the private sector (such as meas-
ures to improve the commercial climate).
.
Henrique Banze, Vice-Minister of Foreign Affairs and Development Cooperation of Mozambique, and Minister Charles Michel sign a new cooperation agreement on 10 April 2008
2828
Belgium has not stood still, and in 2008 it has already set up new ICPs with 7 partner countries for the coming
four years. The countries and sectors involved are as follows:
countries sectors Icp amount
Palestine Education and consolidation of the society50 million euro
(2008-2011)
Benin Agriculture and health52 million euro
(2008-2011)
Mozambique General budget aid, rural development and health48 million euro
(2009-2012)
Bolivia Health and agriculture40 million euro
(2009-2012)
Mali Decentralisation, rural development and food security50.5 million euro
(2009-2012)
Niger Health, rural development and food security52 million euro
(2009-2012)
Uganda Health and education64 million euro
(2009-2012)
29
3. example of a new cooperation programme: mali
Malian context
At the instigation of the OECD’s Development
Assistance Committee, Mali agreed in 1996 to a re-
vision of the aid. Since then, the country has made
huge strides in terms of the harmonisation of the
aid. Among other things, it has accepted a joint aid
strategy, and set up a technical unit and a secretariat.
Belgium, as president of the group of donor countries
(autumn 2006 to spring 2007), has thrown its weight
behind this initiative.
The technical unit is a support group which stimu-
lates the reflection within the group of donors so
that a dialogue with Mali is possible. This unit has
as its global objective to help to realise the Paris
Declaration. Belgium funds the operation of the sec-
retariat. It is this group of donors, known over there
as the Technical and Financial Partners, that has
devised the joint strategy for aid to the country
(SCAP in French). The aim of this strategy is to align
itself on the government’s orientations and priorities.
One of the elements is division of labour and com-
plementarity between the donors in their support
measures for the development of Mali. The aim is to
help Mali in the implementation of its growth and
poverty reduction policy. The common strategy is
based upon new cooperation agreements, a financing
plan and the dialogue with the Malian government in
line with a monitoring framework.
In addition, a detailed matrix has been set up by
the donors, offering an overview of the current and
future aid (2007-2011). The matrix also describes the
division of labour of the donors per sector. Belgium
is in eleventh place among the donors to Mali.
Belgium’s aid amounts to 2.4% of the total inter-
national aid for Mali. Mali is one of the 31 countries
chosen to accelerate the division of labour in the
framework of the Paris Declaration.
© BTC
3030
What is Belgium’s place in this process?
In the period 2004-07, Belgian bilateral cooperation
was involved in seven sectors and six regions. This
fragmentation did nothing to help the impact and the
effectiveness of the aid. To improve this, the new ICP
for 2009-2012 restricted the aid to two priority
sectors. In those two sectors, Mali and the other
technical and financial partners surely recognize
Belgian expertise.
Mali is a very large country, a factor which demands
a great investment in time and human capital if ac-
tions are to be pursued. The geographical extent also
makes it not ideally suited to achieve synergies and
complementarity between actions. By imposing nu-
merical and spatial restrictions, the resources can be
better deployed to the benefit of the results that
Mali wishes to achieve. Belgium wants to continue to
support the national policy, to ensure continuity and
develop a long-term view in terms of bilateral actions.
The actions financed by Belgian Development
Cooperation are entered in the budget for Mali. This
is an important aspect, because it means that Mali
is much better able to plan the income and expendi-
ture for the various sectors. In 2005, as much as 82%
of the Belgian aid was already entered in the Malian
budget. This is set to rise to 85% by 2010.
The ownership of the interventions is entrusted to
the responsible Malian institutions. This puts them
more in tune with the national financing systems.
one step further is the use of Mali’s own public
financingsystemstochanneltheaid(forexample,
paymentsviatheMalianexchequer).In2005this
wasstill0%,by2010itissupposedtoreach60%.
In terms of the use of Mali’s own systems for public
tender procedures, we are faring rather better,
withthepercentagereaching79%by2005.
Belgium plans 50.5 million euro for Mali in the new
ICP in support of Mali’s policy on growth and poverty,
formulated as ‘redistributive growth and a reduction
in poverty via the revival of the productive sectors
and the consolidation of the reforms in the public
sector’.
Accordingly, the funding is directed to:
rural development and food security (first pillar of ■
the Malian policy plan), through support for sub-
sectors such as livestock, fisheries and agriculture;
consolidation of the reforms in the public sector ■
(second pillar), through enshrining the decentrali-
sation achieved in the Koulikoro region.
Belgium participates in the technical group on
‘Agriculture and environment’ as part of the co-
ordination of donors. On the basis of its earlier
interventions (institutional support to the Ministry of
Agriculture and the project with the Azawak cattle
breed), Belgium has won itself a central position
among the donors in this sector. Belgium has deliv-
ered genuine added value in the rural development
sector, more specifically livestock, where Belgium is
the most important bilateral donor and the leader of
the group.
In the decentralisation project in Koulikoro, too (in
the Banamba, Kolokani and Nara regions), Belgium
has delivered added value, something that has also
been recognised by the Direction Nationale des
Collectivités Territoriales as being a reference and
pilot project.
As far as delegated development cooperation goes,
Belgium is making an intervention for Cyprus for the
second successive year. This intervention (2008-09)
falls within the decentralisation of the Koulikoro
region.
© BTC
31
4. example of a new cooperation programme: niger
The context in Niger
Compared to Mali, Niger is not so far ahead with the
implementation of the Paris Declaration. The co-
ordination of donor countries is still rather tentative
and no matrix has yet been put in place in which all
donor contributions are brought together or in which
common objectives are framed. The process of inter-
ministerial co-ordination is weak, and does not yet
make it possible for the government to take over its
running, a factor that hampers dialogue. However,
efforts have already been made in terms of the inter-
nal co-ordination of donor countries working towards
better effectiveness of the aid. The government has
also already set up some sectoral frameworks in line
with the strategies, the action plans and the medium
term expenditure framework (MTEF).
Niger has not yet fully claimed ownership of the sec-
toral approach, whereby the development of a sector
(health, agriculture, education, etc) is viewed as a
whole rather than there being simply more separate
projects carried out. However, this approach does
seem to have been accepted, and to be beginning to
bear fruit, in the Education and Health sectors. The
Technical and Financial Partners still have work to
do in terms of aligning the aid to the government’s
priorities.
What is Belgium’s place in this process?
The previous ICP, for 2004-08, had already thrown its
weight behind the objectives in Niger’s plan for com-
bating poverty, and focused on three sectors: basic
education, basic healthcare (including maternity
care, HIV/AIDS, nutrition, water and water purifica-
tion) and rural development (livestock, rural water
works and gender). The ICP already had a geographi-
cal concentration, which made for synergies and
complementarity between the interventions.
The preparation for the next ICP, for 2009-12, could
not be tackled via a matrix giving the contributions
from all donors, because this has not yet been set up.
According to the same principles as in Mali, Belgium
was able to choose two priority sectors in which its
added value has been recognised by Niger and by the
other donors.
The global objective of direct bilateral coopera-
tion 2009-12 between Belgium and Niger fits within
Niger’s national strategy for faster development
and poverty reduction. The aid is focused on two
sectors: health and rural development/food security. In
order to accomplish this ICP, an amount of 52 million
euro is being made available to Niger.
3232
© Béatrice Petit
capacity-building has always been a priority. The
new programme provides for a continuation of insti-
tutional support. Technical support must not become
a ‘substitute’, but it must contribute to stronger insti-
tutions for the country itself.
In the framework of harmonisation, Belgium is actively
working alongside other donors present in the same
regions: with Luxembourg in the Dosso region, and
equally with the Belgian NGO ‘Vets without Frontiers’
and Unicef in Maradi. Belgium and Niger have still not
formulated any objectives (to be achieved in 2010)
with regard to co-ordination, harmonisation and align-
ment. This work is planned for the course of 2009.
The actions being funded by Belgium are consist-
ent with the national priorities and the sectoral pro-
grammes. Belgium is playing an active role in the
co-ordination of the aid, in particular in the health-
care sector, where Belgium leads the donor group.
Belgium is making use, where possible, of the na-
tional systems and legislation, as in the case of public
tenders. However, the use of the national financing
systems is confined to sectoral budgetary aid for
Education.
Sectoral budgetary aid for Education has demon-
strated the limitations on the use of national
financialsystems.Indeed,afinancialauditindicated
cases of embezzlement. At the same time, this aid
demonstrates how much the dialogue
between the government of Niger and the
Technical and Financial Partners plays a role in
the constructive resolution of this crisis. To some
people, this ‘affair’ showed that democracy in
Niger is beginning to work better: the arrest of the
highest-up culprit, a parliamentary debate and a
cabinetreshuffle.however,itremainsaquestion
to be tracked closely.
33
5. effective aid and the reality of fragile states
The fine principles which are supposed to lead to
more effective aid sometimes collide with the stub-
born reality of development cooperation. These
clashes are all the more violent in countries rated as
‘fragile States’ in international development jargon.
These are countries with weak structures which have
trouble breaking out of the vicious circle between
conflict and underdevelopment. This is a major group
for Belgian cooperation. Depending on the definition,
at least 6 of the 18 partner countries would belong
in this category: DR Congo, Burundi, Rwanda, Niger,
Bolivia and the Palestinian territories.
A consensus exists on the fact that fragile States
demand different responses than countries turning in
better performances. In Accra, the partner countries
and the donors made a formal commitment to tailor
their aid policy and practices to fragile situations, and
also pledged to monitor this more specific approach
carefully.
The difficulties facing Belgian cooperation in the
‘fragile’ partner countries illustrate the need for an
individual approach. In countries such as Niger, har-
monisation and alignment take longer, as can be
seen from the preparatory process for a new co-
operation programme (see above).
Burundi
In Burundi, too, the search is on for a differentiated
approach. The (financial) management systems are
still not fully ready to be able to be used by the
donors as they stand. They, in turn, are not inclined
to switch immediately to budgetary aid. This means
that in the education sector, an intermediate stage
has been built in, taking the shape of a ‘common
fund’, into which donors pay their contributions.
Instead of direct injection into the budget, managed
by Burundi, this fund is run jointly by Burundi and the
participating donors. At the same time, the running
of the fund is geared towards improved capacity in
terms of management at the level of the Minister of
Education. Belgium heads up the donor co-ordination
during the first three years of the Fund (see also
p. 42).
© Béatrice Petit
3434
DR Congo
Likewise, in DR Congo, which not only shows all the
signs of being a fragile State but is also a huge,
diverse country, the international aid community finds
itself facing restrictions. Congo is the focus of a large
number of donors from all round the world. Since 2006,
these donors have set an important process in motion,
the Country Assistance Framework. This is intended
to harmonise and co-ordinate the aid via a system
of Thematic Groups, discussion and decision-making
bodies which are supposed to form a framework for
the implementation of the aid. The Congolese arm of
the World Bank’s Belgian Poverty Reduction Partnership
(see also part 1 of the annual report) also supports this
process with a number of experts and studies.
Two years later, the results paint a mixed picture.
In conceptual terms, the system is recognised by
an external mission by the World Bank and the UN’s
Development Programme (UNDP) as exemplary; yet
there is a yawning gulf between theory and practice.
Both the Common Aid Framework (CAF) and the
Congolese poverty reduction plan contain sectors
which are highly political, such as security, reform
of the public administration, and support for demo-
cratic institutions. This remains too much a matter
of ‘development specialists’, with the political deci-
sion-making layer feeling sidelined. After ten years
of war, development aid was virtually restricted to
humanitarian aid, administered by the humanitarian
organisations and not directed at the development
© Béatrice Petit
3535
of a specific policy by the country itself. Against that
background, it is not easy to integrate economic de-
velopment and the fight against poverty in political
terms both with the external partners and within the
Congolese structures. In response to the weakness
of the public, private and NGO structures, the donors
and their Congolese interlocutors all too often pro-
vide substitute aid that is detached from the socio-
political reality in Congo: technical assistants still do
the work themselves too often, while the Congolese
organisations should be being strengthened.
The absence of genuine ‘ownership’ is a major cause
for the malfunction in the mechanisms which have
been created just to help increase the effective-
ness of the aid. Other factors are also involved. The
macro-economic framework remains food for spe-
cialists, and everyone expects more and better from
the public institutions, in a State whose budget is the
same as that of its neighbouring country of Congo-
Brazzaville, which has 15 times fewer inhabitants. The
State does not yet have a strong enough presence
everywhere, and it has particular difficulties in cor-
rectly channelling the major interests of Congolese
and foreign private investors. Some of them are the
first to complain about the incompetence, but on the
other hand, this chaos plays into the hands of some
dishonest contractors as well.
The painful realisations are shared by many involved
on the ground, and are increasingly giving rise to the
reorientation of the approach to aid. For example,
the priority for the EU and some Member States is to
reform the technical assistance and have it less cen-
tralised in the capital, Kinshasa. Diplomats are also
being increasingly pulled into the dialogue about aid
– which indicates that the political character is being
underscored and it is not merely a technical question.
Work is also underway on a structural strengthening
of the civil society organisations, instead of simply
using them for the delivery of the aid. And finally,
more and more attention is also being paid to the
informal economy, which ultimately comprises 80% of
the reality in Congo.
36
It is not enough just to report how many resources
an organisation is devoting and what activities it is
conducting. The most important thing is to know
precisely what it is actually achieving. So we have to
manage cooperation for results. This is less obvious
than it looks. After all, the tendency is always to say
how much money you are going to give, and what
activities you are going to conduct. In the prepara-
tory process ahead of the new Indicative Cooperation
Programmes, efforts are also made to give a clear
indication of what results are being pursued. In the
same way, when it comes to subsidies to NGOs,
they are requested to formulate results. But what
sort of results can we expect from the development
programmes?
Sorts of results
Results are not always easy to quantify, or even to
see. It is important to define what sort of results a
project or programme is seeking to achieve:
If it is the immediate material accomplishments, ■
such as a school building, a water pump, roads,
an education programme or a new organisational
model, then we talk about the product or the
output.
The ■ outcome: the results in the short or medium
term that show what direct effects the develop-
ment project or programme has achieved. Has the
school building led to an increase in the number
of children able to get an education? Has the
water pump meant that women have more time
for other tasks?
6. managing for results
The impact on development ■ : this result in the
longer term is harder to measure or attribute. It
is usually the result of the interaction between
many factors. Alongside the efforts by the part-
ner country involved and the common contribu-
tions by the various donors, external contextual
elements such as climate, politics, situations of
conflict, economic shocks and so on also have just
as much a role to play.
Ultimately, it is a matter of the results in the ■
longer term on the ground. But this often implies
a lot of intermediate stages. Lessons are also
learned from these intermediate stages, and re-
sults achieved, too, in the procedures and organi-
sation of the individual administration and in the
relations with the various actors in cooperation,
and this report covers those as well.
The results on the basis of evaluations
Evaluations of development programmes can help in
estimating whether Belgian development aid is being
wisely dispensed and contributing to the reduction of
poverty in the world. There is thus a need for feed-
back of the results, but this does not suffice. It is
not enough to know what the evaluations have to
say. A relevant and efficient evaluation also clearly
indicates how the experiences collected can be used.
The importance of evaluations is no longer up for
discussion. The use of these results thus assumes
that decisions are made and measures taken which
are based upon them. Likewise, an evaluation can
show how the knowledge acquired, the techniques
3737
and the new attitudes can have an influence on these
decisions. This method is particularly important in
the evaluation of the organisational capacity build-
ing programmes: everyone still has things to learn
here. The evaluations in this field provide informa-
tion to help improve strategies for capacity-building
and make them more sustainable. Also, the manner
in which the DGDC administration itself sets about its
business can be refined and improved in this way.
So it is the responsibility of the evaluation service
and the management of DGDC to make good use of
the results of evaluations and carefully follow the
recommendations. Every evaluation must also con-
tain an answer, a reaction on the part of the political
decision-making and the management. In the recent
past, too little direct use has been made of the rec-
ommendations, but in 2008, that changed. One of
the indicators laid down by the DGDC management
plan in order to manage for results is that 100% of
the evaluations must get a management response.
But the responsibility lies not just with the manage-
ment. The evaluation reports must be readable and
of high quality, with conclusions based on correct in-
formation, sound and well argued.
A participative process can also strengthen the
evaluation. The DGDC evaluation service strives to
work this out in the preparation and implementation
of evaluations. In every evaluation, the most impor-
tant plus points have emerged because the manag-
ers, staff members and other persons involved have
taken part in full. For them, it is also an important
learning process. The changes put forward encourage
these participants to take decisions and to act.
6. managing for results
The evaluations of Belgian development coopera-
tion, whether they be conducted by the internal
DGDC evaluation service or by the Special Evaluation
Service, can be consulted at www.dgdc.be and
www.diplomatie.be. Where a ‘management
response’ has been formulated, this is likewise
available on the website.
The evaluation of the Survival Fund
The programme of the Belgian Survival Fund (BSF) fo-
cuses on food security, in partnership with Belgian
Technical Cooperation (BTC), NGOs and multilateral
institutions. A recent evaluation covered the activity
programme from 1999 to 2007. The evaluation report
is actively used and forms the basis for a new multi-
year programme for the Survival Fund. This is the
subject of broad discussion, both in Parliament and
with the various actors carrying out projects in the
framework of the BSF.
The conclusions of the evaluation indicate that the
context of cooperation has evolved considerably
over recent years. Nevertheless, the BSF approach
remains relevant:
emphasis on agriculture, ■
integrated approach to the food issue with other ■
social services,
capacity-building in grassroots organisations and ■
decentralised authorities,
attention to the problem of individual capacity of per- ■
sons and defensive strategies against external shocks.
3838
In addition, projects within the BSF are often test
cases, laboratories for an innovative approach by
means of which relatively scant resources can still
tackle a complex topic.
But at the same time, there are also weaknesses.
In practice, not enough work has been done on
the aspect around the ‘defensive strategy’ against
threats in terms of food security. There is a lack of
more concrete directives on how to apply such a
strategy. Also, the criteria for the choice of the coun-
tries seem not be very operational in practice. The
programme is not reaching the poorest and most vul-
nerable groups systematically enough. Many projects
still seem to be making a relatively modest contribu-
tion to actual food security - although they certainly
satisfy the needs of the beneficiaries. There is (too)
little synergy with other cooperation initiatives (by
the BSF itself and other channels).
These conclusions and recommendations are used
to map out the strengths and weaknesses for a new
phase of the BSF.
The contribution made by the BSF to development
cooperation is, however, more topical than ever,
given the current food crisis. In order to increase the
effectiveness of a new BSF programme, it will be
necessary to take better account of aspects such as
the following:
the specific focus on food security needs to be ■
sharpened still further;
better integration into the other programmes by ■
Belgian Development Cooperation. This certainly
applies in the case of the bilateral cooperation
programmes, but also the work on a new strategy
note for agriculture, the application of the princi-
ples of the Paris Declaration, etc;
greater attention to supporting local, decentral- ■
ised institutions.
© Vets without frontiers
39
7. aligning aid on systems in the partner country
Projectaidandbudgetaid
Conventional project aid tends not to be aligned on
the management systems of the partner country.
A project is carried out in many cases outside the
national budget, and also often outside the policy
framework, project materials are often purchased by
(and in!) the donor country, etc. The partner coun-
try’s own management bodies are not strengthened
by this, in fact often quite the reverse.
In many cases, a form of budget aid is more appropri-
ate as an aid instrument. This means that the finan-
cial contribution is merged with the budget of the
partner country - which itself becomes responsible
for it and administers it itself, under clearly-defined
conditions (see text box).
Belgium has experimented for several years with
various forms of budget aid. The experiences were
evaluated in 2007, which resulted early in 2008 in a
new handbook. This offers a framework with criteria
for the assessment process - why budget aid should
or should not be given to a particular country - and
a practical guide with procedures and accountability
mechanisms.
We give a description below of three examples of
Belgian budgetary aid: Mozambique, Vietnam and
Burundi.
WHAT IS BuDGET AID?Budget aid is an instrument in development co-
operation,justlikeprojectsorlargerprogrammes.
The great advantage of budget aid is that it makes
use of the partner country’s management systems,
cutting out the need for parallel circuits, which
place an unnecessary burden on the partner coun-
try’s administration.
However, budget aid is not a blank cheque.
It is money that is pumped direct into the partner
country’sbudget,underclearly-definedconditions,
as a contribution to the country’s general policy
(generalbudgetaid)ortoaspecificsector(sectoral
budgetaid).Theauthoritiesinthedonorcountries
(ideallyjointly)andthepartnercountryitselfmake
theassessment.In2008,DGDCdevelopedanew
handbook which set out precisely the conditions
under which Belgium grants budget aid. Belgium
itself no longer grants direct general budget aid,
but can delegate this via the World Bank or the
europeanUnion(aswasagreedforMozambiquein
2008).ButBelgiumisactiveinsectoralbudgetaid,
in particular in the health and education sectors.
Budget aid stands or falls with the political dia-
logue between the partner country and the
donors. In that dialogue, the conditions are agreed
(policyplans,objectives,indicators)andthemoni-
toringisguaranteed(byreferencetoagreements
onreporting,evaluations,auditobligations,etc).
Also, almost always, technical expertise is supplied
as well. The precise contributions by Belgium or
anyotherdonorcannolongerbeidentified,and
Belgium can also not show that its money in par-
40
IMF stated in January 2009 that Mozambique was
effectively making progress in a number of fields of
crucial importance for its development. For example,
Mozambique was succeeding, despite the economic
malaise, in attracting more private investment capi-
tal. Economic growth was maintained at a strong 7%.
Mozambique also succeeded in generating more of
its own income via more efficient tax collection.
The IMF and the World Bank also applaud the careful
monetary policy and the price stability. One impor-
tant observation is that Mozambique is successfully
driving back poverty, in particular in rural areas.
But some areas of concern still remain. At the same
time as a real reduction in poverty, a greater
inequality is looming – a trend that must be closely
monitored. The country still continues to be heavily
dependent upon foreign aid. Until 2007, it was also
neatly paying off its internal debt, but this stalled in
2008 because the foreign aid was late in arriving…
Mozambique is keeping inflation under control with
difficulty, partly because of climate shocks (such as
flooding) and high food prices. So the country seems
at the moment to be still very vulnerable, certainly in
the present crisis. Many issues still remain to be dis-
cussed in the policy dialogue between Mozambique
and the donor community. But the country is indis-
putably succeeding better in taking control of its own
development.
The exact contribution made by Belgian aid to the
achievement of this result cannot be specified – after
all, it is general budget aid. But there is no doubt that
Belgium has made an effective contribution towards
this positive evolution.
ticular has delivered a given result. That is not the
purpose. The purpose is for the partner country to
be strengthened in achieving the planned results
itself. Belgium can be proud to have contributed
towards that.
Budget aid is not a cure-all. In order to tackle spe-
cificquestionsthatthepartnercountrycannotim-
mediatelyresolveforitself,though,projectsoften
provideausefuladdition,specificallyintermsof
training, as test cases, etc. These projects must
also be aligned wherever possible on the partner
country’s systems, and strengthen them, for exam-
ple when it comes to tender procedures, reporting
andfinancialresponsibility,etc.
Mozambique - general budget aid
Over the past 6 years, Mozambique has received
11 million euro from Belgium in the form of general
budget aid. This figure was added to the general
budgetary resources of Mozambique, without being
specifically allocated to one or another sector. This is
not a blank cheque, the money serves to support the
development policy that Mozambique itself has com-
mitted to paper.
A policy dialogue is conducted around this strat-
egy with the various donors. Every year, a thorough
examination is conducted, by agreement between
Mozambique and the donors, into the extent to
which this policy is actually being effectively car-
ried out. General budget aid comes with accom-
panying measures to improve the management of
Mozambique’s public finances. Belgium also contri-
buted, alongside the general budget aid, to a reform
programme for the Ministry of Finance and the taxa-
tion system. Indirectly, financed via the World Bank,
Belgium also supported the Mozambiquan Ministry of
Planning and Development with an expert on com-
bating poverty.
The results can be seen in the annual progress
report that Mozambique itself draws up about the
achievements and the challenges. In a common
opinion about this report, the World Bank and the
© World Bank / Eric Miller
41
The most important indicators, drawn up in order to
measure the progress of the programme, show a con-
sistently positive evolution. For example, Vietnam
has made a major increase in the funding for educa-
tion for ethnic minority children. Via the ‘Education
For All’ programme, and other programmes in the
education sector, Vietnam is succeeding in effectively
delivering universal basic and lower secondary educa-
tion. The country is working on improving the quality
and accessibility of education. This is measured by
reference to indicators such as the number of schools
with minimal infrastructure, the number of teachers
having taken extra training, the pupil/teacher ratio,
the percentages of students repeating a year or
dropping out, the number of graduates by sex, popu-
lation group, location and so on.
The actual payment of the donor contributions de-
pends on the quality of the reports to be submit-
ted twice a year (activity report, financial report and
audit). This approach ensures an improvement in
monitoring and financial reporting by the Vietnamese
institutions, partly thanks to better cooperation be-
tween the Ministries of Education and Planning and
Investment and the Exchequer.
Vietnam – budget aid for Education
Belgium is one of the seven donors who are con-
tributing, via targeted budget support, to the
Vietnamese programme for ‘Education For All’. This
policy plan for 2003-2015 was set up by Vietnam, by
agreement with the donors. Vietnam’s own contri-
bution amounts to about three quarters of the total
programme budget. In 2009, no more donor contri-
butions are planned. At the request of the Ministry of
Planning and Investment, the donors are contributing
25% of the funding of 5 components in the ‘National
Targeted Programs’ for basic education:
universalisation of lower and lower secondary ■
education,
updating of the curriculum and textbooks, ■
improvement of teacher training by improvements ■
to the infrastructure of the training institutions
and the quality of the training programmes,
support for education in neglected areas and for ■
ethnic minorities,
improvement of the general school infrastructure. ■
The Vietnamese government took responsibility itself
for the components relating to IT training and appli-
cation in schools, boosting foreign language learning
and support for vocational training.
© DGDC/ Dimitri Ardelean
4242
Which aspects does the Fund finance?
These are set out in the sectoral plan. Basic educa-
tion accounts for the lion’s share: 50 to 60% of the
budget, intermediate education gets 25% and higher
education and the universities 17%. The first sectoral
plan, which is now being rolled out, deals with the
infrastructure: cost estimates for 400 to 500 classes.
Other elements relate more to quality: school books
and teacher training.
Training for staff of financial management institutions Thefinancialmanagementofgovernmentfunds
isofcrucialimportanceinimplementingefficient
and sustainable development strategies. For the
periodDecember2007–November2008,Belgium
financedtwotrainingcoursesattheInternational
MonetaryFund(IMF)forstafffromCentralBanks
and Ministries of Finances from various African
countries(bothpartnercountriesandothers).
These two training programmes were particularly
warmly received by these countries.
Thefirsttrainingcourseprovidedforaprogramme
in ‘Financial Programming and Policies’ for 33 partici-
pants from 17 French-speaking African countries
(includingthepartnercountriesDrCongo,Mali,
Morocco,Niger,rwandaandSenegal).Thesecond
course focused on ‘Macroeconomic Management
and Fiscal Policy’ for 26 participants from 15
Africancountries(includingthepartnercountries
Mozambique, Rwanda, South Africa, Tanzania and
Uganda).
Thanks to this success, the IMF decided to extend
the training programmes, once again with Belgian
contributions.
Burundi - Common Education Fund
The newly elected government in Burundi has set
as priorities ‘education for all’ and free basic educa-
tion. However, there are some serious challenges
to be faced: there is a shortage of teachers, class-
rooms, books, budget … Some donor countries, such
as France, the United Kingdom, Luxembourg and
Belgium, have proposed supporting this ambitious
project. Under the leadership of Burundi’s Minister
of Education, saïdi kibeya, an important exercise
was conducted in policy dialogue about a national
sectoral plan, harmonisation of procedures, etc. The
donors channel their aid via a Common Fund.
Saïdi Kibeya says: “We have a national strategy to
reduce poverty. Its third pillar relates to the develop-
ment of the human capital within which education
has a central place. That is why we started working
back in 2005 on a sectoral plan for education, harmo-
nised with the national poverty reduction strategy.
But this plan obviously needs financial resources ...”
So the role of the donors is purely a financial one?
Yes, but they also have an accompanying role. They
can mobilise technical and financial partners.
The common fund brings together four different
countries. Is it not hard to work with such a group?
It is a unique and very effective framework compared
to earlier mechanisms. Now we have a co-ordination
structure with the partners. The procedures are
unique and the relationships uniform. The Minister
of Education does not have to react to four differ-
ent projects or programmes with various procedures.
There is a single point of contact and that circulates
the necessary information. It is a lot easier to work
with such a uniform framework.
© Béatrice Petit
43
8. Harmonisation with non-governmental actors
tion. The Forum meets about four times a year. We
exchange information and hold debates about topics
and sectors shared by different members. For exam-
ple, in 2008, a workshop was held around specific
agricultural methods and a dialogue with Ecuadorian
policy experts about the new constitution. In that
context, FABEC was involved in the preparation of
strategy notes and governmental cooperation pro-
grammes, a point which will be particularly high-
lighted in 2009 in the preparation of the Mixed
Commission in 2010. Likewise, with regard to joint re-
porting and positioning vis-à-vis proposals and policy
options from the Ecuadorian government, FABEC
plays a role.
can you regard the efforts of local and belgian
non-governmental partners on the one hand,
and government cooperation on the other, as
complementary?
Several cooperation associations have already been
set up. NGOs and VVOB are involved in the framing
and implementation of bilateral projects – in par-
ticular with regard to rural development and agricul-
ture – and one bilateral project led to a university
training project in the health sector. These intensive
forms of cooperation have generally delivered good
results. The most striking example was the bilateral
project PROLOZA, which works on social and pro-
ductive infrastructure in the provinces of Loga and
Zamora Chinchipe, where both Vredeseilanden and
VVOB and their local partners were involved in finan-
cial and supervisory terms. The cooperation associa-
tions can take on various shapes. We are shifting the
focus increasingly on to strengthening the govern-
ment institutions. They need to devise an adequate
One of the working principles in the Paris Declaration
is the harmonisation of aid from the various donors,
both the various countries and the various actors, in
other words also multilateral and non-governmental
organisations (NGOs). Over the past year, there has
been quite extensive consultation with the NGO
sector about further harmonisation, with results both
on the ground and in Belgium. The revised co-finan-
cing of the sector (see below) must lead to a qualita-
tive improvement in the future.
Consultation on the ground – the example of Ecuador
In Ecuador, the various actors involved did not wait
for the Paris Declaration before starting to work
more closely together – they have already been
doing that since 2000. lieven De la marche, inter-
national cooperation attaché, outlines how, in this
partner country, the discussion with and between
the various governmental and non-governmental
partners is proceeding, and what results this has
delivered over the years.
“In Ecuador, we set up FABEC, the ‘Forum of Belgian
Actors in Development Cooperation in Ecuador’ -
www.fabec.org.ec. FABEC seeks to create a local con-
sultation and cooperation structure which will serve
as a reference for Belgian Development Cooperation
in this partner country. We want, in this way, to
achieve greater effectiveness in the operation of
each of the organisations. FABEC has fifteen or so
members, including the Development Cooperation
Bureau (DGDC) and BTC, ten or so NGOs, VVOB, BIO
and the local representatives of university coopera-
44
Consultations in Belgium
1) The reform of co-financingThe reform of the co-financing system stimulates the
qualitative enhancement of the NGOs. Organisations
with demonstrable transparent operation, sound
financial health, good management and effective
action can enjoy programme financing over three
years (instead of annual action plans or even sepa-
rate projects). Recognition as a ‘programme NGO’
brings the organisation concerned more financial
security and less administrative rigmarole.
58 of the 76 candidate NGOs have already gained approval
for this three-year financing. DGDC has already funded
programmes (2008-10) for 51 NGOs. Ten or so have sub-
mitted projects in 2008 – this still remains possible.
At the same time, therefore, there is also a need for
measures to ensure the monitoring, evaluation and
control of these projects and programmes, in close
agreement with the NGOs themselves. Administrative
and financial procedures are already operational, but
these can still be simplified.
2) Dialogue with all Belgian indirect actorsThe Minister for Development Cooperation has start-
ed an extensive dialogue with all actors receiving
DGDC funding (NGOs, universities and so on). The
dialogue seeks to improve the effectiveness of the
cooperation.
In the course of this dialogue, the role of the nGos
is explored, with regard to their activities both in the
South and in the North, in a number of fields:
awareness-raising, education and calls for action ■
from the public for an equitable North-South
relationship;
mobilisation, co-ordination, framing of proposals ■
with regard to North-South relations: control over
the government and the private sector so that
their actions and policy measures take account of
the rights of weaker population groups from the
South;
strengthening of local NGOs and their attempts to ■
sustainably improve their rights;
interventions in emergency and sensitive ■
situations.
policy and guarantee high-quality service provision.
This is regarded inter alia in the new programmes put
forward in the ICP for 2007-2010. NGOs work even
more with the ultimate target group(s) and ‘users’ of
the public services. They serve to complement the
bilateral programmes, for example by organising and
training those users or setting in place social con-
trol. Experiences in Ecuador teach us that forms of
cooperation are genuinely effective if the singularity
of the approach, intervention mode and dynamic of
each of the organisations is recognised and if good
agreements are reached about responsibilities and
objectives.
Do you notice an impact in the field of NGO
reform: from a loose project approach via
annual action plans to a multi-year programme
approach?
Various NGOs have been active here for years, and
have clearly developed their own area of action and
attention. The reforms allow the NGOs to guarantee
continuity in their approach. NGOs such as VECO
(sustainable agriculture), Protos (integral water man-
agement), Broederlijk Delen (environment and human
rights/citizen participation) have a clear thematic
focus and work within a long-term perspective. For
others, such as Volens, the programme approach is
relatively new.
© VVOB
4545
Against this background, the NGOs have also con-
ducted a critical self-examination around their strong
and weak points in terms of effectiveness. This
examination can likewise be found on the DGDC
website.
The authors of this reflection note that ‘we should be
thinking about the effectiveness of the NGO sector
in Belgium neither euphorically nor pessimistically.
Belgian NGOs can do something, but they certainly
need to work on eliminating their weaknesses’. The
government is willing to work with them in this frank
dialogue.
Throughout this debate, the innovative role of the
NGOs was also mentioned.
So the dialogue is being continued, and aims to
achieve a consensus about what the NGOs can do
in order to further improve their expertise and their
comparative advantages, and refine their effective-
ness. This dialogue can be tracked via the DGDC web-
site (www.dgdc.be).
.
strengths weaknesses
At the level of the NGOs themselves
The coherence of the NGO programmes with their
strategic framework including the development of
their own specific features
The complementarity between their North and South
operation
The results-oriented character of their actions. Their
strategy to achieve their objectives and make a good
assessment of their results
The weak application of the logical framework, in par-
ticular with regard to the indicators and the applica-
tion of powerful monitoring and evaluation
The delivery of added value for their partners in the
South and the valorisation of their partners in the
wider context
The development of a vision on their new roles and
partner relations
The formal relations with the partners
Their view of synergy in the South and their coop-
eration with various actors, but less with the Belgian
actors
The description of their cooperation modalities and
their sources of financing
Their solvency and liquidity In the case of some NGOs, a major dependency on
DGDC financing
Their broad supporter base and decentralised opera-
tion in Belgium
The average operation of their managing bodies
At the level of the entire sector
The diversity of the sector that is tackling new
challenges
The obstacles amid the diversity to making progress
on internal division of labour, upscaling and
harmonisation
46
Belgium has decided to conduct a fundamental
switch in the funding of the multilateral partner or-
ganisations. Belgium is opting for maximum applica-
tion of so-called ‘core financing’ – the contribution
to an organisation’s general resources – and wants
at the same time to scale down the ‘earmarked
contributions’ – these being contributions that
Belgium assigns to specific projects within an organi-
sation. In addition, the financing of the multilateral
organisations will now be conducted on the basis of
multi-year programmes – meaning that the Belgian
aid becomes easier to predict. This new policy fully
meets the call for more effectiveness in the opera-
tion of the multilateral development organisations.
The UN Secretary General, the officials in charge at
the Funds and Programmes and the Member States
of the UN have repeatedly pointed to the need for a
reassessment of the core contributions. The donors’
current financing practices are partly to blame for
the existing fragmentation, overlapping and lack of
coherence in the multilateral system. The overly high
level of ‘earmarked’ contributions makes it hard for
an organisation to devise its own long-term policy.
It can only carry out the various projects and pro-
grammes at the request of a whole string of donors.
A limited number of specific financing channels will
not participate in this shift from ‘earmarked’ to
‘core’ contributions, namely the contributions from
the Belgian Survival Fund, for the basic allocations
for peace-building (preventive diplomacy and con-
flict prevention) and for part of the humanitarian
financing.
Belgian Development Cooperation will, furthermore,
be able to fund specific programmes with the multi-
lateral organisations in the framework of the bilateral
cooperation with the 18 partner countries. Within the
bilateral envelopes available for this purpose, though,
a certain percentage can be used for delegated
cooperation with other actors, such as multilat-
eral organisations. This must, of course, happen by
agreement with the bilateral policy in that partner
country. Belgium has, in the past, financed specific
interventions with its multilateral partners, because
the chosen partner was seen as being a well placed
– if not the best placed – actor to conduct activities
relevant to development in that given area. Examples
of this are the UNDP in terms of strengthening parlia-
ments, UNIFEM in terms of gender-based budgeting,
UNICEF in terms of child protection, etc.
The stronger emphasis on core financing does mean
that the possibility of supporting Belgian policy
focuses disappears, and the visibility must be supple-
mented in other ways. The partner organisations are
being sent a letter in January 2009 by the Minister,
asking them to announce this change of policy. This
change will also bring about changes in the way
in which DGDC monitors the organisation. DGDC
will take a more proactive part in the management
bodies.
9. effectiveness of multilateral cooperation
4747
9. effectiveness of multilateral cooperation
© Unicef / G. Pirozzi
Effectiveness in multilateral cooperation: ‘One UN’ – pilot projects
Since early 2007, the United Nations has had pilot
projects running in 8 countries in order to get its
many development organisations on the ground to
start operating as a single entity, the so-called ‘One
UN’ concept.
The pilot projects are a direct consequence of the
2006 report ‘Delivering as One’. This came into being
at the instigation of the then Secretary-General Kofi
Annan, for the sake of creating more coherence and
effectiveness in the operational activities of the
United Nations. The UN organisations are gathered
in the field in line with the ‘Four Ones’ principle: one
leader, one programme, one budget and one office.
After the first year, the ‘One UN’ pilot projects
already seem to be delivering some concrete results.
Much stronger national ownership of the develop-
ment process seems to have arisen, together with
improved alignment on the national priorities. There
are clear signs of more coherence and less fragmen-
tation and duplication. There are likewise reports of
lower transaction and administrative costs for the
conduct of the aid. On the other hand, the establish-
ment of the new working method did demand very
intensive and occasionally costly efforts by the or-
ganisations concerned themselves. In this way, the
UN hopes to make the development programmes
faster and more effective, and thus to accelerate
progress towards the achievement of the Millennium
Development Goals.
InTernaTIonale beleIDsconTexT:
onTwIkkelInGsaGenDa onDer Druk
1
48
Tegelijkzorgdeditprojectvooreensneeuwbalef-
fectbijandereboerendiehiernietbijbetrokken
waren.
49
3
© Béatrice Petit
DGDc awareness-raIsInG acTIvITIes3
50
InTernaTIonale beleIDsconTexT:
onTwIkkelInGsaGenDa onDer Druk
1
•
De impact van de klimaat-verandering is dramatischTegen 2080:
ondervoed.
weinig of te veel water.
laaggelegen gebieden moeten vluchten.
hebben risico op malaria. Bron: UNDP
L’impact du changement climatique est dramatique D’ici 2080:
seront sous-alimentées.
pénurie ou d’excès d’eau.
les zones côtières et les régions de basse altitude.
taires courront le risque de contracter la malaria. Source : UNDP
The impact of climate change is dramaticThe situation in 2080:
nourished.
flooding or drought.
flee coastal zones and low-lying areas.
risk of contracting malaria. Bron: UNDP
Millenniumdoelstelling 7 : Waarborgen van een duurzaam milieuObjectif du Millénaire 7: Assurer un environnement durableMillennium development goal 7 : Ensure environmental sustainability
www.diplomatie.be
By means of mobile exhi-bitions, DGDC keeps the public informed about the North-South issue. These exhibitions are available for free to Belgian schools, municipalities, social/ cultural organisations, associations and so on.
sensIbIlIserInGsacTIvITeITen van DGos
Belgian Development Cooperation at-tended the open Business Day run by the Federal Public Service for Foreign Affairs onSunday5October2008.Withanexten-sive exhibition, DGDC gave an overview of itsactivitiestosome2,000visitors.
Minister Charles Michel visits the Belgian Development Cooperation standattheeuropeanDevelopmentDays2008inStrasbourg(15to17November2008).
5151
DGDC once again subsidised some audiovisual productions in 2008,including‘lesDamnésdela Mer’, a documentary by the Belgian Moroccan jawad Rhalib.
Dimension 3, the magazine of the Belgian Development Cooperation,hadamakeoverinSeptember2008,withitscontent being reoriented, on the basis of the results of a wide readershipsurvey.In2008,fiveissuesofDimension3werepublished.
Awareness-raising activity in the Brussels stations on the occasion of World Water Dayon22March2008.Some20,000 informative cards were handed out.
5252
DGDCissuedvariousbrochuresin2008,in-cluding on the themes of ‘Environmental care and development cooperation’ and ‘Food aid and food security’.
www.diplomatie.be
Bodemvriendelijke landbouw herstelt gedegradeerd land in de Uluguru-bergen (Tanzania)Door massale ontbossing en intensieve landbouw op de hellingen stroomt de vruchtbare bodem weg. Hierdoor brengt de landbouw weinig op en vervuilt het water in de vallei. Duurzame bodemvriendelijke landbouw biedt een oplossing: minimale landbewerking, maximale bo-dembedekking (onder meer met bomen), roteren van gewassen. Ook traditionele kennis wordt benut: com-posteren op het veld, terrasbouw.
L’agriculture respectueuse du sol restaure les terres dégradées dans les montagnes Uluguru (Tanzanie)La déforestation massive et l’agriculture intensive sur les coteaux provoquent le déplacement des terres fer-tiles, réduisant ainsi la production agricole et polluant l’eau de la vallée. L’agriculture durable respectueuse du sol offre une solution : travail minimal du sol, cou-verture maximale du sol (entre autres par des arbres), cultures alternées. Le savoir traditionnel est également mis à profit : compostage des champs, construction de terrasses.
Soil-friendly agriculture revives deteriorated land in the Uluguru mountains (Tanzania)As a result of massive deforestation as well as intensive agriculture on the hills, fertile land is washed away. Hence, agriculture is low-productive and the water in the valley is contaminated. Sustainable soil-friendly agriculture offers a solution: a minimum of soil dis-turbance, a maximum of soil cover (e.g. with trees), culture rotation systems. Traditional knowledge is also being used: in-field composting, terrace cultivation.
Interuniversity co-operation of KULeuven (VLIR-UOS)Budget: 300,000 EUR – 1997 2007
MOD 1 : Honger uitroeien MOD 7 : Duurzaam milieuOMD 1 : Eradiquer la faim OMD7 : Environnement durableMDG 1 : Eradicate hunger MDG7 : Sustainable environment
ER IS MAAR EEN AARDEVOOR 6,6 MILJARD MENSEN
SAMEN DE AARDE
LEEFBAAR HOUDEN !
Daarom wil de Belgische ontwikkelingssamenwerking deze landen bijstaan om zich te beschermen tegen het veranderende klimaat. Voor het welzijn van de hele aarde.
© NASA
De opwarming van de aarde is het gevolg van de enorme uitstoot van broeikasgassen door vooral de rijke landen. Toch betalen de arme landen de grootste prijs : ondervoeding, armoede, ziekte, migratie en milieuschade.
FOD BUITENLANDSE ZAKEN, BUITENLANDSE HANDEL EN ONTWIKKELINGSSAMENWERKING • www.dgos.be
22 april: Dag van de Aarde
MENSEN
‘NSEN
‘
22 avril : Journée de la Terre
UNE SEULE TERRE POUR 6,6 MILLIARDS D’ÊTRES HUMAINS
TOUS ENSEMBLE
POUR UNE TERRE VIABLE !
C’est pourquoi la Coopération belge au développement s’engage à aider ces pays à se protéger des changements climatiques, pour lebien-être de toute la Terre.
SPF AFFAIRES ETRANGERES, COMMERCE EXTERIEUR ET COOPERATION AU DEVELOPPEMENT • www.dgcd.be
Le réchauffement de la Terre est le résultat des énormes quantités de gaz à effet de serre que rejettent surtout les pays riches. Cependant, ce sont les pays pauvres qui en paient le prix fort : malnutrition, pauvreté, maladies, migrations, dégradation de l’environnement.
© NASA
The General Information Cycle, the training programme for anyone who wants to get actively involved in developmentcooperation,tookafreshturnin2008.Fromnowon,theInformationCyclesareevenmoreinteractive, and more closely focused on concrete commitment.
An advertisement in the framework of Earth Day on 22 April 2008 in ‘het Nieuwsblad’, ‘het laatste Nieuws’, ‘le Soir’, ‘La Dernière Heure’ and ‘Metro’. These newspapers allow us to reach a readership of 1.5 million people.
© Jan Crab
53
3
© Béatrice Petit
annexes4
1.BelgianOfficialDevelopmentAssistance(ODA)2004-2008
2. Multi-year bilateral obligations and budget aid
3.Multi-yearNGOprogrammesapprovedin2008
InTernaTIonale beleIDsconTexT:
onTwIkkelInGsaGenDa onDer Druk
1
54
1. Belgian Official Development assistance (oDa) 2004-2008
annexes
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
Directorate-General for Development cooperation (DGDc)
Governmental cooperation
Technical cooperation and
scholarships84,038,873 116,882,862 122,055,980 131,827,879 164,074,553
Financial cooperation and
budget support20,820,769 17,678,158 29,053,860 31,351,646 47,751,840
Special emergency aid for
Central Africa (launched in
2006)
0 0 10,000,000 5,000,000 20,500,000
Operation costs BTC 9,472,500 23,029,208 19,053,589 20,306,000 21,032,890
Contribution to debt
cancellations13,634,000 20,208,491 0 0 0
State-to-state loans 22,706,038 20,226,866 26,767,703 25,559,245 16,045,620
subtotal Governmental cooperation
150,672,179 198,025,585 206,931,131 214,044,770 269,404,903
non-Governmental cooperation
Cooperation via NGOs 90,564,124 93,284,701 96,284,169 99,150,043 99,612,783
VVOB 7,875,062 8,028,469 8,400,000 8,596,316 8,452,767
APEFE 7,905,188 7,725,953 7,234,846 8,524,332 8,094,522
VLIR - Flemish
Interuniversity Council24,160,539 26,805,442 28,327,157 26,607,871 28,729,722
CIUF/CUD - Interuniversity
centre of CFWB22,858,533 21,070,392 24,927,496 23,910,341 23,782,966
Scientific institutions 11,249,727 11,795,108 12,977,337 13,476,508 14,150,776
Other non-governmental 9,303,627 18,662,082 9,049,536 7,456,760 10,425,793
subtotalnon-governmental cooperation
173,916,799 187,372,146 187,200,541 187,722,171 193,249,328
55
1. Belgian Official Development assistance (oDa) 2004-2008
multilateral cooperation
Voluntary multilateral
contributions7,052,650 7,407,129 7,440,313 6,678,391 8,296,267
to the United Nations 6,753,929 7,120,875 7,171,625 6,422,346 8,018,560
Obligatory contributions 92,490,130 79,412,997 96,389,812 90,791,450 95,567,930
to the United Nations 65,411,069 62,229,604 72,770,395 62,478,816 67,159,693
European Development
Fund and Bank91,771,261 103,496,574 104,669,938 104,860,013 132,560,006
World Bank Group 82,322,583 152,333,333 78,325,000 76,000,000 175,320,000
Regional Development
Banks19,710,918 18,379,920 29,938,415 27,266,541 30,860,353
Environmental treaties 9,926,777 10,067,313 9,738,378 12,668,806 12,679,354
Multilateral debt
cancellation0 0 8,161,708 12,832,368 18,674,711
subtotal multilateral cooperation
303,274,319 371,097,265 334,663,565 331,097,570 473,958,621
belgian survival fund
Governmental/manage-ment/awareness raising
2,290,174 2,166,659 6.568.713 4,620,058 13,313,634
Via NGOs 8,728,110 9,142,301 12.584.625 13,363,246 13,843,855
Via multilateral institutions 8,981,241 8,690,648 8.346.622 12,014,882 6,484,181
subtotal belgian survival fund
19,999,526 19,999,608 27,499,960 29,998,186 33,641,671
community building 9,488,497 4,615,834 14,948,666 15,242,863 19,262,250
Humanitarian food aid 14,858,849 17,355,827 15,359,000 14,525,000 25,882,000
local nGos in the south 715,896 3,985,539 6,890,296 5,007,409 5,999,580
africalia 1,680,000 1,628,651 1,935,000 2,310,000 2,015,000
support to the private sector (bIo,,,,)
30,592,014 27,895,000 19,871,551 28,138,365 44,626,496
Interest subsidies 6,468,051 8,192,718 11,409,718 11,009,296 13,053,489
awareness raising en education in belgium
5,523,781 5,575,389 6,275,862 6,944,171 6,022,631
administration, evaluation, other
3,444,369 1,399,181 1,689,470 1,958,388 1,213,826
Total DGDc 720,634,281 847,142,744 834.674.759 847,998,189 1,088,329,793
InTernaTIonale beleIDsconTexT:
onTwIkkelInGsaGenDa onDer Druk
1
56
2. multi-year bilateral obligation and budget aid
new multi-year bilateral agreements entered into in 2008
country Project/programme amount (in euro)
Benin Agricultural support - Mono and Couffo departments 5,500,000
Expertise fund 1,250,000
Institutional support to the Ministry of Agriculture 3,500,000
Institutional support to the healthcare sector 4,300,000
Burundi Institutional and operational support to the justice system 5,800,000
Institutional support to the Ministry of Public Health 900,000
Support for the reform of paramedic training 2,000,000
Institutional support to ISABU - Agricultural Research Institute 3,000,000
Institutional support to the Ministry of National Education and
Scientific Research
800,000
Support for vocational training 5,000,000
Local social and economic development - rural roads 10,000,000
Cambodia Basic healthcare - consolidation phase 3,000,000
Morocco North Morocco education programme 3,000,000
Micro-credits 2,000,000
Waste processing 14,500,000
Mozambique Rehabilitation of basic infrastructure 3,400,000
Palestine Construction & rehabilitation of schools 10,000,000
Reinforcement of healthcare 5,000,000
Rwanda Institutional support for sanitary development - Kigali 15,000,000
Support for small animal husbandry 5,000,000
Reconstruction of Bushenge hospital 1,800,000
Social/economic and cultural development in Northern Province 4,000,000
Provision of drinking water and sanitation 12,320,000
Senegal Healthcare insurance system 2,500,000
Capacity-building - decentralised financial systems 4,400,000
Tanzania Sustainable improvement of banana cropping 1,500,000
Income-generating activities - Kigoma and coast region 2,162,000
Vietnam Provision of water and sanitation 7,500,000
Institutional reinforcement at provincial and district level 2,500,000
Various partner
countries
Replenishment / extension of existing projects and funds 6,130,000
Total 147,762,000
57
2. multi-year bilateral obligation and budget aid
new multi-year bilateral agreements entered into in 2008
country Project/programme amount (in euro)
Benin Agricultural support - Mono and Couffo departments 5,500,000
Expertise fund 1,250,000
Institutional support to the Ministry of Agriculture 3,500,000
Institutional support to the healthcare sector 4,300,000
Burundi Institutional and operational support to the justice system 5,800,000
Institutional support to the Ministry of Public Health 900,000
Support for the reform of paramedic training 2,000,000
Institutional support to ISABU - Agricultural Research Institute 3,000,000
Institutional support to the Ministry of National Education and
Scientific Research
800,000
Support for vocational training 5,000,000
Local social and economic development - rural roads 10,000,000
Cambodia Basic healthcare - consolidation phase 3,000,000
Morocco North Morocco education programme 3,000,000
Micro-credits 2,000,000
Waste processing 14,500,000
Mozambique Rehabilitation of basic infrastructure 3,400,000
Palestine Construction & rehabilitation of schools 10,000,000
Reinforcement of healthcare 5,000,000
Rwanda Institutional support for sanitary development - Kigali 15,000,000
Support for small animal husbandry 5,000,000
Reconstruction of Bushenge hospital 1,800,000
Social/economic and cultural development in Northern Province 4,000,000
Provision of drinking water and sanitation 12,320,000
Senegal Healthcare insurance system 2,500,000
Capacity-building - decentralised financial systems 4,400,000
Tanzania Sustainable improvement of banana cropping 1,500,000
Income-generating activities - Kigoma and coast region 2,162,000
Vietnam Provision of water and sanitation 7,500,000
Institutional reinforcement at provincial and district level 2,500,000
Various partner
countries
Replenishment / extension of existing projects and funds 6,130,000
Total 147,762,000
overview of new multi-year commitments for budget aid 2008
country programme amount (in euro)
Uganda Decentralisation process - local government sector investment
plans
4,000,000
Health sector 10,000,000
Peru Health sector (health insurance) 3,000,000
Burundi Education sector 5,000,000
Support for economic reforms (via World Bank Trust Fund) 4,000,000
Total 26,000,000
This table includes only the amounts transferred to the partner country, not the associated expertise costs
InTernaTIonale beleIDsconTexT:
onTwIkkelInGsaGenDa onDer Druk
1
58
3. multi-year nGo programmes approved in 2008
multi-year nGo programmes approved in 2008
prog. 2008-2010
NGO Title Subsidy (in euro)
11 11 11From the international perspective, achieving better
North-South relations by joining forces in Flanders16,568,039
ACTEC A job for everyone 7,109,885
AQUADEVProgramme for the reinforcement of African micro-
finance organisations2,199,936
VBRC-OS RotaryVacci-plus in DR Congo - City of Kinshasa Province -
health sector1,258,448
ATOLMethodological support for development initiatives in
the South917,860
Autre Terre Doing business differently in North and South 1,630,641
Artsen zonder
vakantie
Reinforcement of the health systems, with the empha-
sis on hospitals1,653,600
Bevrijde Wereld Food for the future 4,205,596
Broederlijk Delen Solidarity for sustainable development 22,232,465
CARAESOrthopaedagogical Care and Mental Health Care for the
Great Lakes Region 3,037,978
CDI-Bwamanda
Contribution to socio-economic development in the
Northern Equatorial Province (DR Congo), the Yaka
Region (DR Congo) and South Borgou (Benin)
3,086,883
CEMUBAC
Developing welfare for populations through improve-
ments to health and the struggle against hunger with
due regard to the MDGs
1,969,508
59
3. multi-year nGo programmes approved in 2008
NGO Title Subsidy (in euro)
CETRIUnderstanding the world better in order to change it -
points of view from the South577,372
CNCD-11.11.11
Coordinating the actors in international co-operation
to promote the Millennium Goals and the right to
development
1,912,430
DMOSIntegral training directed at upwards mobility and active
citizenship for young people in South and North16,363,835
COTAInformation, awareness-raising and quality support for
the actors in cooperation 1,048,269
Rode Kruis België Present, always, everywhere 6,499,815
DamiaanactieImproving basic health in developing countries by com-
bating leprosy & TB13,720,686
DISOP Employability and citizenship 11,562,652
Djapo From basic school to world school 1,838,030
Echos
Communication
Promoting new development cooperation practices to
accompany the emergence of a new human-centred
development cooperation paradigm
1,156,874
Entraide et
fraternité
Promoting peasant agriculture through citizen
approaches3,536,276
Solidarité Socialiste
Reinforcing social actors in the South and the North
committed in networks for the promotion of democracy
and economic and social rights
9,123,039
FOSOrganisations in North and South - Solidarity for the
right to health and right to decent work10,937,501
Handicap
International
Upright living: for a society that prevents avoidable dis-
ability, for a society for all where disabled people enjoy
their rights
13,295,362
Les Iles de Paix More enlightened and active public opinion 1,145,477
6060
NGO Title Subsidy (in euro)
IPISInformation and advice service on topics affecting non-
governmental development actors436,582
ITECO Education as a vector for North/South social change 1,177,642
Louvain
développement
The welfare and dignity sought by disadvantaged popu-
lations in deprived countries are improved: LD contrib-
utes to the international relations policy of the UCL as a
dynamic actor serving society
8,560,418
Max HavelaarMore sustainable development in the South thanks to
more sales of Fairtrade-labelled products in the North 1,358,844
MEMISA Reinforcement of the health system at various levels 9,663,471
Miel Maya Honing Bee-keeping, sustainable development and fair trade 660,984
Artsen Zonder
Grenzen
Improving access to healthcare for persons with AIDS
and/or TB12,258,964
Le Monde selon les
FemmesGender as a development condition 1,314,827
Oxfam magasins du
mondeThe Made in Dignity campaign with younger people 1,328,783
Oxfam SolidariteitChanging the balance of power to ensure respect for
social and economic rights10,795,967
Oxfam
WereldWinkels
Fairtrade: an honest alternative for the North and the
South alike2,493,827
Petits Pas
Reinforcement of the capacities in the North and the
South for environmentally responsible and endogenous
development
477,945
6161
NGO Title Subsidy (in euro)
PROTOS Water: a lever in development 8,701,896
Rode Kruis
VlaanderenImproving the situation of the most vulnerable 5,674,699
SCI North/South Action/Training 495,393
Steunfonds Derde
WereldEmpowerment for the right to health 2,733,885
SLCDCombating poverty in rural communities targeted by an
integrated socio-economic development programme3,199,999
Protestantse
Solidariteit
Support for the fight against HIV/AIDS, TB and leprosy in
central and western Africa3,422,476
SOS Faim Supporting rural people in their fight against poverty 10,980,845
TRIASLinking-up: local economic development in a globalising
world17,163,553
UCOSActive world citizenship for more international solidarity
and sustainable development in North and South426,765
VIC From integration to self-determination 3,878,401
VredeseilandenA viable living for family farmers through participation in
the markets17,772,898
Dierenartsen
Zonder Grenzen
Optimising the contribution of livestock-raising in the
economy and social life of farming/breeding families4,355,527
Wereldsolidariteit
Getting together with the social movements to promote
dignified work and social protection to combat poverty
and social exclusion
12,073,830
Total 299,996,880
InTernaTIonale beleIDsconTexT:
onTwIkkelInGsaGenDa onDer Druk
1
62
orGanIGram van de foD buitenlandse Zaken, buitenlandse Handel en ontwikkelingssamenwerking
orGanIZaTIon cHarT The fps foreign affairs foreign Trade and Development cooperation
S0.4
Special Evaluator
S0.1
Crisis Centre
S0.3
Regions and
Communities Interface
S0.6
Modernisation
and Management
Support
P&C
Press and
Communication
S0.2
Missions
Inspectorate
P&S
Protocol
and Security
S0.5
Conflict
Prevention and
Peacebuilding
S0.7
Security
63
orGanIGram van de foD buitenlandse Zaken, buitenlandse Handel en ontwikkelingssamenwerking
orGanIZaTIon cHarT The fps foreign affairs foreign Trade and Development cooperation
Minister
Chairman Executive
Committee
Policy unit
DG
Development
Cooperation
(D)
DG
Consular Affairs
(C)
DG
Legal Affairs
(J)
DG
European Affairs and
Coordination
(e)
DG Multilateral Affairs
and Globalisation
(M)
DG
Bilateral Affairs
(B)
P&o
Personnel and
organisation
B&B
Budget and
Management
Control
ICT
Information and
Communication
Technology
InTernaTIonale beleIDsconTexT:
onTwIkkelInGsaGenDa onDer Druk
1
64
orGanIZaTIon cHarT DGDcDirectorate-General for Development cooperation
Director General D
D0.1Policy Support
D0.2Quality Control &
Evaluation
D0.3Budget and ODA
D0.0General Affairs &
Secretariat
D2Special
Programmes
D1Governmental Programmes
D4Multilateral
and European Programmes
D3Non-governmental
Programmes
D5Awareness-
raisingProgrammes
D4.1United
Nations andBretton Woods
Institutions
D4.2European
Union
D4.3Sectoral
Funds andProgrammes
D5.1Third-Party Awareness-
raising
D5.2Awareness-raising by
DGDC
D3.3Other
Partners
D3.1NGOs
D1.1North Africa and Middle
East
D1.2Central Africa
D1.3West Africa
D1.4Southern
Africa,East Africa
D1.5Latin America
and Asia
D1.6Regional
Cooperation
D2.1Emergency
Aid, Rehabilitation and Food Aid
D2.2Survival Fund
D3.4Budget
Programmingand FinancialControl for
Non-governmentalProgrammes
D3.2Universities
and Scientific Institutions
65
abbreviations
BIO Belgian Investment Company for Developing CountriesBSF Belgian Survival FundBTC Belgian Technical CooperationDG Director-GeneralDGDC Directorate-General for Development CooperationDRC Democratic Republic of CongoEU European UnionFAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations GNI Gross National IncomeHIV/AIDS HumanImmunodeficiencyVirus/AcquiredImmunodeficiencySyndromeIMF International Monetary FundICP Indicative Cooperation ProgrammeMDG Millennium Development GoalNGO Non-Governmental OrganisationODA BelgianOfficialDevelopmentAssistanceOECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and DevelopmentUN United NationsUNDP United Nations Development ProgrammeUNRWA United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near EastVVOB Flemish Association for Development Cooperation and Technical SupportWFP World Food Programme
orGanIZaTIon cHarT DGDcDirectorate-General for Development cooperation
Colophon
Federal Public Service Foreign Affairs, Foreign Trade andDevelopment Cooperation
Communications DepartmentRue des Petits Carmes 15B-1000 BrusselsBelgium
www.diplomatie.bewww.dgdc.be
Contributions and coordination: Directorate-General for Development CooperationFinal editing: Jan De MetsTranslation: Bellis TranslationsDesign: www.cibecommunicatie.beProduction: Communications Department FPS Foreign AffairsContact: +32 2 501 81 11 – www.diplomatie.be/en/contact
Responsible editor: Dirk Achten, rue des Petits Carmes 15, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium
The information contained in this report is for information only. The Federal Public Service is in no way legally bound by it.
Legal registration: 0218/2009/11
April 2009
www.diplomatie.bewww.dgdc.be
Federal Public Service Foreign Affairs,Foreign Trade and Development Cooperation