+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Diabete ed ASA: cosa c è di nuovo? - Benvenuti Nel Sito ... · Università Magna Græcia di...

Diabete ed ASA: cosa c è di nuovo? - Benvenuti Nel Sito ... · Università Magna Græcia di...

Date post: 25-Feb-2019
Category:
Upload: ngonhu
View: 214 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
31
Università Magna Græcia di Catanzaro Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica Cattedra di Medicina Interna ed U.O. Malattie Cardiovascolari Scuola di Specializzazione in Geriatria Prof. Francesco Perticone [email protected] Diabete ed ASA: cosa c’è di nuovo?
Transcript

Università Magna Græcia di Catanzaro Dipartimento di Medicina Sperimentale e Clinica

Cattedra di Medicina Interna ed U.O. Malattie Cardiovascolari

Scuola di Specializzazione in Geriatria

Prof. Francesco Perticone [email protected]

Diabete ed ASA:

cosa c’è di nuovo?

* P<0.0001

2

4

6

8

Uri

c ac

id,

mg

/dl

0

*

2

4

6

8

Hs-

CR

P, m

g/L

*

NGT IGT DM

<155 >155

0

0

0,4

0,8

1,2

1,6

2

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900

0.001

0.012

0.340 0.799

0.355 0.192 0.124 0.090 0.071

HR

(p

lus u

ric a

cid

1 g

/d

L in

cre

ase

)

ACh % of increase

Ac. Urico, Funzione Endoteliale e Diabete

Ac. Urico e Glicemia

Perticone F et al, Int J Cardiol 2011

Perticone F et al, Int J Cardiol 2012

Endothelial dependent vasodilation after ASA treatment in diabetics

Re

acti

ve H

ype

rem

ic In

dex

0 1 4 weeks Wash out

*

* P=<0.0001

Box and whisker plots of urinary excretion of 11-dehydro-thromboxane (TX)B2 n healthy patients and in type 2 diabetic

patients.

Santilli F. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:391–7.

11-dehydro-TXB2n 20 type 2 diabetic patients before and after improved metabolic control.

Santilli F. et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2006;47:391–7.

ATC, BMJ 2002; 324: 71-86

METAANALYSIS FROM THE ANTITHROMBOTIC

TRIALISTS' COLLABORATION (2002)

— Recommendations for primary prevention of CVD in people with diabetes. Antiplatelet agents

Aspirin therapy (75–162 mg/day) should be recommended as a primary prevention strategy in those with diabetes at increased cardiovascular risk, including those who are >40 years of age or who have additional risk factors (family history of CVD, hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia, or albuminuria).

People with aspirin allergy, bleeding tendency, existing anticoagulant therapy, recent gastrointestinal bleeding, and clinically active hepatic disease are not candidates for aspirin therapy. Other antiplatelet agents may be a reasonable alternative for patients with high risk.

Aspirin therapy should not be recommended for patients under the age of 21 years because of the increased risk of Reye’s syndrome associated with aspirin use in this population. People under the age of 30 years have not been studied.

Ogawa, H. et al. JAMA 2008;300:2134-2141.

Participation in Japanese Primary Prevention of Atherosclerosis With Aspirin for Diabetes (JPAD) Trial

Ogawa, H. et al. JAMA 2008;300:2134-2141.

Atherosclerotic Events

Ogawa, H. et al. JAMA 2008;300:2134-2141.

Total Percentage of Atherosclerotic Events According to Treatment Group

Ogawa, H. et al. JAMA 2008;300:2134-2141.

Subgroup Analysis of Incidence of Atherosclerotic Events

Ogawa, H. et al. JAMA 2008;300:2134-2141.

Adverse Effects

Belch, J. et al. BMJ 2008;337:a1840

POPADAD trial: Progress of participants in trial

0,0

5,0

10,0

15,0

20,0

25,0

Composite end point

Aspirin

No Aspirin

%

PRIMARY END POINTS:

0,05,0

10,015,020,025,0

Death from coronary heart disease or stroke

Aspirin

No Aspirin%

Variables Aspirin (n=638) No aspirin (n=638) Effect estimate* (95% CI)

P value

Composite end point

116 (18.2) 117 (18.3) 0.98 (0.76 to 1.26) 0.86

Death from coronary heart disease or stroke

43 (6.7) 35 (5.5) 1.23 (0.79 to 1.93) 0.36

*

*Death from coronary heart disease or stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, or above

ankle amputation for critical limb ischaemia.

%

SECONDARY END POINTS:

0,02,04,06,0

Coronary Heart Disease Death

Aspirin

No Aspirin%

0,0

0,5

1,0

1,5

2,0

Stroke Death

Aspirin

No Aspirin%

0,02,04,06,08,0

10,0

Non-fatal myocardial infarction

Aspirin

No Aspirin% 0,02,04,06,0

Non-fatal stroke

Aspirin

No Aspirin%

Variables Aspirin (n=638)

No aspirin (n=638)

Effect estimate* (95% CI)

P value

Death (any cause) 94 (14.7) 101 (15.8) 0.93 (0.71 to 1.24) 0.63

Coronary heart disease death 35 (5.5) 26 (4.1) 1.35 (0.81 to 2.25) 0.24

Stroke death 8 (1.3) 9 (1.4) 0.89 (0.34 to 2.30) 0.80

Non-fatal myocardial infarction 55 (8.6) 56 (8.8) 0.98 (0.68 to 1.43) 0.93

Non-fatal stroke 29 (4.6) 41 (6.4) 0.71 (0.44 to 1.14) 0.15

Belch, J. et al. BMJ 2008;337:a1840

Causes of death Aspirin plus antioxidant

(n=56)

Aspirin plus placebo (n=38)

Placebo plus antioxidant

(n=59)

Placebo plus placebo (n=42)

Myocardial infarction

11 10 8 5

Other coronary heart disease

4 10 7 6

Stroke:

Ischaemic 3 0 3 2

Haemorrhagic 2 0 1 2

Unknown cause 3 0 0 1

Other cardiac 5 0 4 1

Other vascular 3 1 2 2

Cancer 16 9 18 13

Trauma 0 0 2 0

Other 9 8 14 10

Cause of death in patients with diabetes according to

treatment group.

Belch, J. et al. BMJ 2008;337:a1840

Kaplan-Meier estimates in aspirin and no aspirin groups of proportion of patients who

experienced the composite end point of death from coronary heart disease or stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction or stroke, or above ankle amputation for critical limb ischaemia;

and death from coronary heart disease or stroke.

Belch, J. et al. BMJ 2008;337:a1840

Kaplan-Meier estimates for aspirin and no aspirin groups of proportion of patients who

died from any cause, compared with proportion expected based on age and sex specific population rates for Scotland, 2002

Neri Serneri et al. EHJ 2004; 25:1845–1852

Picotamide, a combined inhibitor of thromboxane A2 synthase and receptor, reduces 2-year mortality in diabetics with peripheral arterial disease: the DAVID study

Randomised

n=1209

Assigned aspirin

n=606 (50.1%)

Assigned picotamide

n=603 (49.9%)

Lost to follow-up

n=26 (4.3%)

Lost to follow-up

n=32 (5.3%)

Completed trial

n=571 (94.7%)

Completed trial

n=580 (95.7%)

Study profile

DAVID t

rial: 2

-year

mor

tality

bene

fit

of

pico

tamide v

s ASA

Kaplan-Meier analysis of the time-to-death according to treatment assignment

Neri Serneri et al. EHJ 2004; 25:1845–1852

Type of event

Picotamide (n = 603) Aspirin

(n = 606)

n Cumulative

incidence (%) n

Cumulative incidence (%)

Myocardial infarction

(fatal and non-fatal) 15 2.9 19 3.6

Stroke (fatal and non-fatal) 14 2.7 12 2.2

Amputation 4 0.8 4 0.8

Other deaths 12 2.2 19 3.8

At least one event 43 53

Mortality and morbidity events by treatment groups: the DAVID Study

Neri Serneri et al. EHJ 2004; 25:1845–1852

PLA2

F2-Isoprostanes

TxA2

Gp IIb/IIIa

O2-

COX1

O2-

AA

PLA2

F2-Isoprostanes

TxA2

Gp IIb/IIIa

O2-

COX1

ASA

O2-

AA

Oxidative stress and platelet activation in diabetic patients

Diabetes 2012 C T2DM

ASA - + - + ASA - + - +

ASA - + - + ASA - + - +

PLA2

F2-Isoprostanes

TxA2

Gp IIb/IIIa

O2-

COX1

ASA

O2-

AA

Oxidative stress and platelet activation in diabetic patients

Diabetes 2012

Diabetes 2012

Platelet recruitment in diabetic patients

Conclusion

• Aspirin treatment alone is not sufficient to reduce cardiovascular events in diabetes mellitus

• This lack of efficacy may be dependent upon NOX2-dependent platelet isoprostane over-production

• Down-regulation of isoprostanes may represent a new avenue to optimize antithrombotic treatment


Recommended