Date post: | 23-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | mabel-wilkerson |
View: | 218 times |
Download: | 3 times |
Diagnostics in EM; test thresholds and likelihood ratios
Published courtesy of the CEM FOAMed Networkhttp://www.cemfoamed.co.uk/portfolio/diagnostics-in-
em/
How do we use all of this information??
100 %
0%
Likelihood of diagnosis being correct
Below test threshold
Diagnosis considered
How do we use all of this information??
0%
Likelihood of diagnosis being correct
Above test threshold
Diagnosis considered
100 %
Above test threshold
How do we use all of this information??
Below test threshold
Appropriate testing
Diagnosis considered
0%
Likelihood of diagnosis being correct
100 %
Likelihood ratio Shift in probability
>10 Large (often conclusive)
5-10 Moderate
2-5 Small
1-2 Minimal
1 Nil
1-0.5 Minimal
0.5-0.2 Small
0.2-0.1 Moderate
<0.1 Large (often conclusive)
Application of serial tests100 %
0%
Finding 1
Finding 2
Finding 3
Likelihood of diagnosis being correct
Above test threshold
Below test threshold
Diagnosis considered
Perry et al. Sensitivity of coputed tomography performed within six hours of onset of headache for diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage: prospective cohort study.
BMJ 2011; 343:d4277 doi. 10.1136/bmj.d4277
Han et al., The Role of Cardiac Risk Factor Burden in Diagnosing Acute Coronary Syndromes in the Emergency Department Setting. Ann Emerg Med. 2007; 49
Who not to test100 %
0%
Likelihood of diagnosis being correct
Below test threshold
Diagnosis considered
Who not to test but to treat
0%
Likelihood of diagnosis being correct
Above test threshold
Diagnosis considered
100 %
Who should be tested
Appropriate testing
Diagnosis considered
0%
Likelihood of diagnosis being correct
100 %