DIAMOND DRILLING REPORT
ON THE R
AM1, IDE1, IDE3, AND ANN 3 FRACTION.
MINERAL CLAIMS
RECORD NUMBERS 31188,24994
24996 AND 45132
PART OF MINERAL LEASE NO 9 - HIGHLAND VALLEY KAMLOOPS MINING DIVISION
NTS SHEET 921/6, 921/7
LATITUDE 50'26 ' N
LONGITPE 12 1°00 ' E OWNED BY &TIONAL TRUST COME'ANY LIMITED
510 BURRARD, VANCOWER, 5. C. V2C 257
OPERATED BY HIGHMONT OPERATING CORPORATION
BOX 3000, LOGAN M E , B. C. VOK 1WO
Report Prepared By .
G.R. SANFORD - HIGHMONT MINE GEOLOGIST 10 JANUARY 1984 o
C E O ( , Q G I C A L b . R A N C i H A S S E S S M E N T R E P O R T
I N D E X MAP
SPENCES BRIDGE MAMILT; LAKE
DIAMOND DRILLING REPORT
ON THE
AM1, IDE1, IDE3 and ANN 3 FRACTION
MINERAL CLAIMS
PART OF MINING LEASE NO 9
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
Index Map
Introduction
i) Location and Access
ii) Claim Description
iii) Summary of Work Done
r
Detailed Technical Data and Interpretations
i) Purpose . 4
ii) Results 4
iii) Interpretations 5
Location Map - Drill Hole Collars - Drawing 2
iv) Conclusions 9
Itemized Cost Statement
Author's Qualifications
Appeildix I
Diamond Drill Logs
Hole 83-376
Hole 83-377
Hole 83-378
Appendix I1
Assay Results
DIAMOND DRILLING mPORT ON THE
AM1, IDE1, IDE3, AND ANN 3 FRACTION MINERAL CLAIMS
PART OF M I N I N G LEASE NO. 9
INTRODUCTION
i) Locat ion and Access
Mineral Lease No. 9 i s l o c a t e d i n t h e Highland Valley on t h e southwest
f l a n k of Gnawed Mountain, a t a n e l e v a t i o n of 1600 m. The orebody c u r r e n t l y 4
being mined by Highmont Operat ing Corporat ion l i e s e n t i r e l y w i t h i n t h i s
l e a s e . (See Dwg. No. 1 )
i
Access t o t h e Highmoont Operat ion i s v i a t h e Highmont Mine Road, a n 8 km.
a l l weather g r a v e l road which connects w i t h t h e paved highway connect ing
Logan Lake and Ashcroft .
i i ) Claim Desc r ip t ion
Mineral Lease No. 9 c o n s i s t s of 40 minera l c laims and f r a c t i o n s and
was i s s u e d on December 10, 1979 f o r a per iod of 21 years . Mining i s a c t i v e l y
be ing c a r r i e d o u t by Highmont Operating Corporat ion from t h i s l e a s e a t t h e
r a t e of 68000 tonnes pe r day supplying 23-27000 TPD of m i l l feed.
Consi-derable development work has been done on t h e Highmont ground, ,
beginning wi th t h e i n i t i a l c la im s t a k i n g i n 1955 and 56. Torwest Resources
and Highmont Mining Corporat ion d id major percuss ion and diamond d r i l l i n g i n
1966 and 67 and then drove some 1170 m of underground development f o r bulk
sampling and inves t lg i i t i ons i n /9b7 and 1968. At.lditic?n,~l diamond d r i l l i n g
Page 3
'Cr wasdoneby Teck Corporat ion i n 1971, b r ing ing t h e exp lo ra t ion d r i l l i n g t o t a l
t o 46400 m of diamond d r i l l i n g and 18600 m of percuss ion d r i l l i n g .
The d r i l l i n g had o u t l i n e d two l a r g e minera l ized zones, t o t a l l i n g 0 1 2 2
m i l l i o n tonnes a t 0.26% Cu. and .027% Molybdenum.
A product ion d e c i s i o n was announced on A p r i l 24, 1979. S t r i p p i n g
commenced i n June 1980 and t h e f i r s t o r e was mi l l ed i n December 1980.
Seve ra l t e c h n i c a l papers have been publ ished on t h i s proper ty . Two of
t h e s e r e p o r t s a r e :
I
1) "The Highmont Copper-Molybdenum Depos i t s , Highland Valley, B r i t i s h
Columbia" by Bergey, Carr ,and Reed, CLMM B u l l e t i n , December 1971.
2) "Highmont: L inea r ly Zoned Copper Molybdenum Porphyry Deposi ts and
t h e i r S ign i f i cance i n t h e Genesis of t h e Highland Valley Ores"
CIMt S p e c i a l Volume No. 15 pp 163-181, by Reed and Jambor 1976.
The c u r r e n t diamond d r i l l i n g program was c a r r i e d ou t w i t h i n t h e a c t i v e . East P i t .
0
i i i ) Summary of Work Done
I
D r i l l i n g :
Three NQ s i z e diamond d r i l l h o l e s k o t a l l i n g 288.0 meters .
A l l work was performed w i t h i n Mining Lease No. 9, on
Mineral Cia-ims AM1, Tl>E1, IIE3 and ANN3.
Page 4 *
DETAILED TECHNICAL DATA AND INTEPL'RETATIONS
i) Purpose
The purpose of t h e d r i l l i n g was two f o l d . F i r s t l y , i t was d e s i r e d t o
i n t e r s e c t suspec ted water bea r ing s t r u c t u r e s and hope fu l ly lower t h e pore
water p r e s s u r e on t h e p i t w a l l s and secondly t o provide a s say informat ion t o
a i d i n f u t u r e p i t expansion p lans . The h o l e l o c a t i o n s w e r e i n gene ra l ly
poor ly de f ined a r e a s and t h e e x t r a c o s t of diamond d r i l l i n g a s opposed t o
cheaper percuss ion d r i l l i n g wasdeamedworthwhile f o r t h e a s say and s t r u c t u r a l
in format ion which could be obta ined .
ii) Resu l t s a
A l l d r i l l i n g w a s done under c o n . r a c t t o Maitland Explora t ions - Vernon,
*cr B. C. A s k i d mounted Longyear 38 d r i l l was used. The c o n t r a c t o r provided a
sk idde r f o r moving t h e d r i l l . 0
Core was logged and s p l i t a t t h e Highmont Mine site. S p l i t t i n g was done
i n 3.048 meter (10 f o o t ) l e n g t h s and a s says f o r copper 2nd molybdenum were
done us ing s t anda rd atomic abso rp t ion techniques by Highmont's own Assay Lab.
The d r i l l c o r e i s now s t o r e d a t t h e Highmont Ming s i t e . Diamond d r i l l
l o g s a r e a t t a c h e d a s Appendix I, and a s say r e s u l t s a r e t a b u l a t e d a s Appendix 11.
The coord ina t e s of t h e diamond d r i l l h o l e s , i n r e l a t i o n t o Highmont's'
g r i d system (non-metric) a r e :
HOLE # ' - SIZE AZIMOTM NORTHING EASTING ELEVATION - DIP LENGTH
iii) I n t e r p r e t a t i o n s
The geology of t h e p rope r ty has been w e l l documented i n t h e two p rev ious ly
mentioned r e p o r t s . The o r e occurs a s f r a c t u r e coa t ings and as s h e a r s i n t h e
h o s t Skeena Quartz D i o r i t e . F rac tu re d e n s i t y and rock a l t e r a t i o n a r e both
impor tan t f o r o r e l o c a l i z a t i o n . The mine ra l i za t ion , c o n s i s t i n g of Chalcopyri te , .
Born i t e and 14olybdenite i s d e f i n i t e l y r e l a t e d t o t he s l i g h t l y younger
Bethsa id ia Quartz Porphyry dyke, which l i e s j u s t o u t s i d e t h e c u r r e n t south-
w a l l of t h e Stage 1, East P i t . u
Rock a l t e r a t i o n w i t h i n t h e Skeena Quartz D i o r i t e i s c l a s s e d as f r e s h t o
l i g h t , moderate, o r i n t e n s e , based p r i m a r i l y on f e l d s p a r a l t e r a t i o n . Fresh
o r l i g h t l y a l t e r e d rocks have f e l d s p a r s w i th a s l i g h t greenish t i n t due t o
s e r i c i t i z a t i o n and mafics a r e una l t e r ed . Moderately a l t e r e d rocks have f e l d s p a r s
which a r e most ly e i t h e r waxy green o r buff w i t h some c h l o r i t i z a t i o n of mafics .
I n t e n s e l y a l t e r e d rocks have f e l d s p a r s which a r e t o t a l l y waxy green o r buff
and t h e maf ics a r e a l l bu t destroyed. I n extreme cases , f e l d s p a r s a r e chalky
* due t o complete k a o l i n i z a t i o n .
Hole 83-376 ----------- I
This h o l e was c o l l a r e d a t t h e extreme e a s t end of t h e e a s t p i t ( see Dwg. No 2 )
on 5310 berm. The f l a t h o l e was d r i l l e d approximately a t r i g h t ang le s t o t he
dominant joint set: i n t h i s a r e a w l~ i ch d i p s 65' towards 330' ( 6 5 / 3 3 0 ) . Assay
r e s u l t s were gene ra l ly d iscour :~ging , wi th only a 6.1 m s e c t i o n from 94.5 t o
100.6 which assayed .09% Cu and .035% Mo. bging considered ore by current
Highmont standards.
Rock alteration was generally intense. The sections from 60.9 to 91.4 and
117.3 to 122.8 were only moderately altered.
A major waterflow was encountered at 24m. Initial flow rates were in excess
of 80 liters per minute and caused problems in,maintaining the hole. When the
hole was completed to the desired depth of 123 m, slotted plastic drain pipe
was installed to hole bottom and the first 15 m o$ the hole was completely
grouted around solid plastic pipe.
0
Two .Tropari tests were attempted at 71.6 m and 121.9 but neither was
successful for Azimuth due to malfunction. The dip remained constant at
4-02' up. Waterflow gradually decreased and stopped abruptly in mid November 1983.
0
Hole 83-377 ----------- . This hole was collared some 470 m west of hole 83-476 on 5270 mid berm and
was drilled at an acute angle into the south wall of the pit. This hole was
also drilled approximately at right angles to expected water bearing structures.
Circulation was lost within 3 m of the hole collar, but the hole was
continued to bottom at 7 1 m. The expected water bearing structure was inter-
sected from 60.4 to 64.9 but only minor seepage (less than 4 liters per hou~) * *
was noted., Slotted pipe was again installed and the collar grouted to 15 m
depth.
Assay results were mcre favourable with the first 10.7 m assaying .34% Cu
Page 8
and .010% Mo. The rest of the hole was barren.
The rock intersected was variably altered, following no particular
pattern.
Hole 83-378 ----------- This hole was drilled parallel to hole 83-377, some 28 m further west.
It was hoped that the gougy zone from 60.7 to 64.9 in hole 83-377 would carry ,
more water further into the wall.
Assay results from this hole were most encouraging. The first 27.4 m
assayed .61% ~u/.020% Mo, 12.2mfrom 51.8 to 64.0 assayed .32% ~u/.026% Mo
and the last 18.3 m of the hole assayed .33% Cu. and .027% Mo.
Rock alteration was mixed between intensely altered and light to medium
altered zones, again with no particular pattern. Short sections from 30.5
to 54.9 were Bethsaida Quartz Porphyry. Known geology predicted the hole to be
close to the Porphyry dyke. e
The zone from 85.3 to 92.0 was the anticipated water zone and was very
gougy, but again only a trickle of water (less than 4 liters/hour) was intersected.
Caving ground in the vicinity of the 70 In mark prevented slotted pipe from
being installed past this point. The collar was not grouted. I
Page 9
iv) Conclusions
Favorable ore intersections were found in two of the three holes drilled.
Future expansion of the pit to the south will enable this ore to be mined,
but an expansion to the east does not appear likely at this point.
The stability of the east end pit wall was improved by relieving the
water pressure behind the wall when tapped by hole 83-376. The sudden
stoppage of flow in mid November coincided with the first major cold spell of
the winter. This indicates a direct connection to surface runoff.
4
The hoped for ~ater~bearing structure in the south pit wall was not
intersected. The amount of gougy material in hole 83-378 from 8 5 . 3 to 92.0
may indicate a potential problem area in future pit expansions.
0
Highmont Mine Ge lo ist 4 .)
** 4 Page 10
ITEMIZED COST STATFMENT
1) Diamond D r i l l i n g C
Maitland Explora t ions Ltd. (22 Sept 1983 - 14 Oct. 1983)
288 m, of NQ Core D r i l l i n g inc lud ing mobi l iza t ion , r e n t a l of
sk idde r , f i e l d c o s t work i n caving ground and s u p p l i e s consumed
inc lud ing co re boxes and s l o t t e d PVC pipe .
T o t a l Cont rac tor Cost
2) Assays
96 Copper @ $7.50
96 Molybdenum @ $7.50
(15 Dec. - 30 Dec. 83)
I
3) Core Logging
S. Waller 3 days @ $100/day
(1 Nov. 1983 - 15 Dec. 1983)
4 ) Core S p l i t t i n g and Sample Bucking
S. Waller, G. Sanford, M. P o r t e r 5 days @ $100.
(1 Dec. - 30 Dec. 1983)
5) Superv is ion of Diamond D r i l l i n g
G. Sanford 22 September - 14 Oct. 1983
18 days X $150.00 X 1/3 t ime
6 ) Vehicle Use
22 Sept . - 14 Oct. 1983
7) S i t e P repa ra t ion
4 H r s . D8 Cat work (EIighmont Cat)
22 Sept . - 10 October @ $100/hr.
Page 11
81 Survey Control
Markup of Holes and Survey of C o l l a r s
22 Sept . - 14 Oct. 1983
day - 2 Man Highmont C r e w
9) Supp l i e s Provided by Highmont
Grout - 10 Bags @ 7.00
Inc lud ing F re igh t and Taxes
10) Report P repa ra t ion , Superv is ion of 'core Logging
G. Sanford 4 Days @ $150
1 Nov. 83 - 10 Jan. 1984.
TOTAL
AUTHOR' S QUALIFICATIONS
I, GERALD R. SANFORD, OF 1901 PARKER DRIVE, MERRITT,
,BRITISH COLWfBIA, DO HEKEBY CERTIFY THAT:
1) I a m a Geologis t employed by Highmont Operating
2) I graduated from t h e Univers i ty o f B r i t i s h Columbia 0
i n 1969 w i t h a Bachelor of Applied Science Degree i n
Geological Engineering
3) I have been cont inuous ly employed a s a geo log i s t i n
t h e mining i n d u s t r y s i n c e graduat ion; and t h a t
4 ) t h i s r e p o r t d e s c r i b e s work performed on Mineral Lease
No. 9 under my supe rv i s ion dur ing t h e per iod 20 September
- 15 October 1983.
APPENDIX I
DIAM0,ND D R I L L LOGS
HOLE 83-376
HOLE 83-377
HOLE 83-378
--- DIAMOND DRILL LOG. i
Gri2 KG. Proper ty Section No. Hole No. 83-376
erzTtej 26 Sept. 83 I Bearing 130'37' / Dips +1°37' / t 75966.59 1 Elevation 5323.82 1 Location 5310 East Pit i
C3~2;:okd 2 Oct. 83 1 Len6& 122.8m / Surface Hole X I Dep. 112230.24 I h v e l 5 110 I Lozjiedby S. Waller I
C*" - <.,:T.~ " -. . --- - f Casfrg 1.52m r I Undrrground Hole 1 Remmks - - . - - --- --- ----____- -- ? GGYxlG:; ksasy
Description I <Ave:~ge TV ,. . a%b= i I J&des
i . 5 1 60.9 1 I Generally buff colored, intensely altered Skeena Quartz Diorite. Mafics 1 I 0 I -I
1 all but destroyed. Buff color alternates with a waxy green feldspar I - I ! I I I L
I alteration. Some greenish chloritic sections. Entire hole has - I I I I 1 batchY development of a salmon colored alteration which resembles - ---
I II ! [ I~-s~ar, but is probably due to fine iron oxide particles. Also scattered I i
-__C_ I
I I
i , I
/disseminated molybdenite in quartz veins and fracture controlled bornite I 1
- I I
and chalcopyrite throughout entire hsle. Hit major water flow at
21.0 - 24.1 Very chloritic I I . --- 24.4 - 27.4 Poor recovery ( 2 0 % ) not much gouge I .
I I -I- --
I
i - I 124.4. Initial flow rate + 8 u p m . v
! i 1
24.4 - .25 cm Quartz vein f 1 I
I i j I
33.5 - 38.1 Lot of earthy hematite I
34.4 Earthy hematite slip I I I I
39.7 - 40.8 Some shearing I I 1 I i
45.7 - 47.8 Limonite stained O I I
54.9 Minor shearing 1
-- I . I
i i pur? aq%y~ paxa3~e~s -suoyaexa~~er'lamp~ esnoynaxd sapaxaaxe dfasuaau~. I EeL1l 1 9-16
--- I - I 1 i I-
I 1 I I
1 "1 I f paxo~o~ uou~es dy~aed ~-rj~s.suoyasas paxaa~r? 3xoqs pue suor~~as
I i I! ! I I
j
9L€-E8 'ON aloH ON uora3a s Xaxadoxd 'ON PVr3
I I 1 auoz uayolq pue a%noS xouy~ 9'1L - 8'69
liiI I pazyuy~oey d~aaa~duo~ sxedsp~ad T'L9 - 9'99
I I
*spuaTquxoy 0
pue sa2r?orq bat~aj uaaxg -uorJsxa-STe xodsp~aj uaax8 IOrm mnrpaH i
0'99 1 6'9s
- -
3LE-E8 'ON aT*H OK uag~a g Xl.radord 'ON PF9 u
APPENDIX I1
ASSAY ~ S U L T S t
HOLE 83-376
HOLE 83-377
HOLE 83-378
HIGHMONT OPERATING CORPORATION Date: .
Mine Assay Laboratory Report Form
Assayed By:
'&
9
*
,, ?
1-L- "40
q 00 L
, O O ?
,003
,013
,o r I
,OL\
r 008
,008
,a\\
000
, OO< ,0023
,o 07
REMARKS
83-376
3
FOOTAGE ! m)
1.5- 3 o
3 0 : G . \
b \ - 9 . 1
4 , \ - 1 2 . 2
\ L t - l s . ~
1st- 10,g
183 -21 3
2 1 3 - m . 4
Z L G - L ~ +
z7e -30.5
30.r-33s
3 q 5 - 3 C . L
3 ~ . d -39d
+ %CU
,o?,
1 3 2
0z 106
,04-
to b . O l
.O 1
,Q? . 10%
7%
,03
FOOTAGE (it)
C- 10
10-213
Zs-30
';SO- eO
0 - s o SO-GO
LO-30
-13-90
80-50
30 - l o o
\GO - 1 1 0
110 - \to \ L 3 - { 3 0
TAG NO.
\I38
1\39 1 \ 4 0
, \\Q+\
\\a It+-3
I \ &
\ \ G S
t i %
l I+? \ lee 1 lqu, 1150
-- --
LAB. NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
s
10
11
12
13
MIGHMONT OPERATING CORPORATION Date:
Pdine Assay Assayed By:
Laboratory Report Form FOOTACE LAB. FOOTAGE
"40
1 9\4..-9+,s .1.S 2 % , S - 9 7 5
Q
25 0
2 5 -- - - .--
---------- ??.. ----*
i
15
16
17
18
19
20
4
-5- 2 2
23- - ----...
WIGHMONT OPERATING CORPORATION + 1
Date: 15 ou5~ 1903 Mine Assay
Assayed By:
-. - --
-...".-...
; * +
kc-&
%to
.O \ 4-
.a lz
,009
,007
.OO 8
looS
, o o B
,oat3
,OO+
, oa 8
,CW'3
004
o o d
$00 9.
~ ~ o S
. a o Z
.oa 1
.oOQ-°
,002-
a a+-
003
. O O L
0 0 %
,OI. 0
t
REMARKS
83-37-7
I
I*--------
-
* ,
.--
FOOTAGE ( m)
, 9 - z , e
2,e-s,C
sc " 8 . 5
i3.q - I \&
l ib -Rh
1 % ~ - . 137
1-19 -207
2 ~ 7 ‘ 2 3 %
13.3 -? :., R
x3 -30 .0
9 0 - 3<>)
_ ? L P ) - " ' ; ~ ~
? L O - t ? , ~
790- %;,\
%I- M , \
qr~..eE:L
a;-- 51.z-
s! L aW.3
s + > - _ E ~ . Y
5 7 ~ - 6 0 . ~
bo+- L 3 +
, 3 - 4 C ~ - ,&
LI,Q -" (,o, 5
+
,
%m
. SI
,ee . .22
.23
a \? ((3
.\lo
.2\
* I Q
0 14-
~8
.o+ . :oS
. I0
, \ L
.o 4-
602
+ o d
a o 4-
.OL
a 0
.03
. l o
. 2 3
FOOTACE f f t )
3- - s 8-18
tQ-2.B
291 - 3 8
C33p--+@
%$-St3
SS-68
'6%--78
3%-89
3%-48
9% -108
l O Q ~ - r l $
- r tS
\L@ - l3B
13k3 T 1Q-a i -
\s&- I60
\bB - n$ - -0%
1 6 ~ - 1 9 e
'%-?as xzja -- >-lP '
L .
TAG NO.
ILS \
ri,sZ
.lbS 3
lbse
I b S S
-Ibh( ,
IG67
l b S 8
lcS9
lLLo
I b d I
, I b t Z
1163
LAB. NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
JJ3
19
20
21
22
23
w I L L 4
I&(,S
1b6G
, I L L ?
148
\&d?
Ib'To
I G 7 ) i
I b7 -
- 1673
r : f. c .. , 8 "
HIGHMONT OPERATING CORPORATION Date: 2o. Z?,, Dee, rsQ 1" 1
, , Mine Assay t 1 Assayed By: , 1 ! Laboratory Report Forri
TAG NO.
0 \
I b 8 L
, . ib83
, 16Qe
16 8 S
lb 86 1687
. lb88
. ~ Q u )
167 0
1b91
I b 7 S
\b3L 'II-
\07
, 163% 1 b3
FOOTAGE f f t )
lo -'LB
u -30
30-40
4.0%- 50
SO'- bi3
&?0
' n - 8 ~
80k90
qQ1rCQ I ' 100-110
I / C S e I L Q
120- 1 3 0
jso-lqs
!Q-ca-lsG
~yn..-l~o
LAB. NO.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
FOOTAGE ! m>
1#5-3 0
3 . 0 - 6 J
6 . 1 - 9 1
C + I - . I L L
I?LC\SZ
~ s ~ - \ ' t j S
($3--21.3
2\.3 - 24.4
2_9-.%- h a
77%-3,s
305- 335-
33.9-3bG
u6-39 b
3 % ~ - 4 ~ 7
92-7. es.7 & ~ 7 - SRS
%CU
-4-0
,98
39
- 3 0
9 5
# 28
,O , 3 b
. ,LS
a 13 ,O 0,
4
0 \'L , .
10
,o+
a \O
~ W O
o \ o , OZ?
003 I
.0\7
,03c
. O I O
0 0 0 7
. OLS ,0\3
.,a+
,a 03 ,00G
tC~3$ .
,a 04 ,007
, o a S
RolE REMARKS
$3'937$3
L
. HIGHMONT OPERATING COWPUHAI ION
i i Mine Assay i : 3 .
Assayed By: Laboratory Report Form