Date post: | 01-Apr-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | lena-elkins |
View: | 260 times |
Download: | 0 times |
DIBELSTM: Overview and UseGood, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic
Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available: http://dibels.uoregon.edu/.
Funded through the Centers for Implementing K-3 Behavior and Reading Intervention Models
Preventing Reading Difficulties: A Three-Tiered Intervention Model
U.S. Department of Education grant contract number H324X010013
Principal Investigator: Sharon Vaughn, Ph. D.
Co-Principal Investigators: Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph. D. and Batya Elbaum, Ph. D.
DIBELSTM: Overview and Use
Kim Rodriguez & Thea Woodruff
University of Texas
Center for Reading and Language Arts
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available:
http://dibels.uoregon.edu/.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Objectives
Learn how to administer select DIBELSTM measures for screening and progress monitoring.
Learn how to use DIBELSTM to inform instruction.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Early Childhood Research Institute on Measuring Growth and Development
Institute for the Development ofEducational Achievement
University of Oregon, College of Education
Oregon Department of Education
Assessment of Big Ideas in Beginning Reading
DIBELSTM Benchmark Assessment
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
What are the DIBELS™?
Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills™
Brief, standardized, individually administered measures
Assess development of pre-reading and early reading skills
Correspond to the 5 critical elements of reading instruction
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
What are the DIBELS™?
Each measure assesses accuracy and fluency
The measures are predictive of later reading proficiency
Multiple forms make DIBELS™ a useful tool for frequent progress monitoring
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
DIBELSTM Measures
Today’s measures
Letter Naming Fluency (LNF) K-1
Oral Reading Fluency (DORF) 1-3
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
DIBELSTM Measures
Additional measures Initial Sound Fluency (ISF) PK-K Phoneme Segmentation Fluency (PSF) K-1 Nonsense Word Fluency (NWF) K-2 Word Use Fluency (WUF) PK-3 Oral Retell Fluency (RTF) 1-3 Spanish versions for K-3
Website: http://dibels.uoregon.edu/
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
The DIBELSTM
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
BIG IDEAS in Early Literacy Skills Phonemic Awareness.
The awareness and understanding of the sound structure of our language, that “cat” is composed of the sounds /k/ /a/ /t/.
Phonics or Alphabetic Principle. Based on two parts: Alphabetic Understanding. Words are composed of letters that
represent sounds, and Phonological Recoding. Using systematic relationships between
letters and phonemes (letter-sound correspondence) to retrieve the pronunciation of an unknown printed string or to spell.
Accuracy and Fluency with Connected Text. Readers who are not fluent at decoding are not able to focus their
attentional resources on comprehension.
National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups. Bethesda, MD: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Big Ideas and DIBELSTM
Big Idea of Literacy DIBELS Measure
General Risk Indicator Letter Naming Fluency
Phonological Awareness Initial Sounds Fluency
Phoneme Segmentation Fluency
Alphabetic Principle Nonsense Word Fluency
Accuracy and Fluency withConnected Text
DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency
Comprehension Retell Fluency
Big ideas of early literacy should drive the curriculum and instruction. And,
Big ideas should drive the measures we use.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
General Instructions
Each section is a one-minute, timed measure.
Read scripted directions.
You will need: DIBELSTM 6th Edition Administration and Scoring Manual Student stimulus packet Timer Clipboard Colored Pen
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
DIBELSTM Letter Naming Fluency (LNF)
Kaminski, R. A., & Good, R. H. (2002). Letter Naming Fluency. In R. H. Good & R. A. Kaminski (Eds.), Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available: http://dibels.uoregon.edu/.
Prior editions were supported, in part, by the Early Childhood Research Institute on Measuring Growth and Development (H180M10006) and Student-Initiated Grant (H023B90057) funded by the U. S. Department of Education, Special Education Programs.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Letter Knowledge (measured by Letter Naming
Fluency) Accuracy of naming letters
Fluency in naming letters
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Materials
Student copy of LNF probe
Examiner copy of LNF probe
Timer
Colored pen
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
LNF Probes Each probe is a
random sort of 2 lower case and 2 upper case alphabets.
Lines help
students to keep their place.
Probe 1
c c N u Q M u h S i
n b e N F f o a K k
g p k p a H C e G D
b w F i h O x j I K
x t Y q L d f T g v
T V Q o w P J t B X
Z v U P R l V C l W
R J m O z D G y U Y
Z y A m X z H S M E
q n j s W r d s B I
r A E L c c N u Q MTotal: ____/110
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Directions1. Place the student copy of randomized alphabets in front of the
student.
2. Place the examiner copy of randomized alphabets in front of you on the clipboard, but shielded so that the student cannot see what you record.
3. Say these specific directions to the student:Here are some letters (point). Tell me the names of as many letters as you can. When I say “begin,” start here (point to first letter), and go across the page (point). Point to each letter and tell me the name of that letter. If you come to a letter you don’t know I’ll tell it to you. Put your finger on the first letter. Ready, begin.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Directions4. Start your stop
watch after saying “Ready, begin.” If the student fails to say the first letter after 3 seconds, tell him/her the letter and mark it as incorrect.
5. Follow along on your copy. Put a slash (/) through letters named incorrectly.
Probe 1
c c N u Q M u h S i
n b e N F f o a K k
g p k p a H C e G D
b w F i h O x j I K
x t Y q L d f T g v
T V Q o w P J t B X
Z v U P R l V C l W
R J m O z D G y U Y
Z y A m X z H S M E
q n j s W r d s B I
r A E L c c N u Q MTotal: ____/110
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Directions6. If a student stops or
struggles with a letter for 3 seconds, tell the student the letter and mark it as incorrect. Prompt the student by pointing to the next letter and saying, “What letter?” (if necessary).
7. At the end of 1 minute, place a bracket (]) after the last letter named and say, "Stop."
Probe 1
c c N u Q M u h S i
n b e N F f o a K k
g p k p a H C e G D
b w F i h O x j I K
x t Y q L d f T g v
T V Q o w P J t B X
Z v U P R l V C l W
R J m O z D G y U Y
Z y A m X z H S M E
q n j s W r d s B I
r A E L c c N u Q MTotal: ____/11036
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Scoring Directions
1. Put a slash (/) through letters omitted or named incorrectly.
2. The following responses should be counted as errors:a. The student substitutes a different letter for the
stimulus letter, e.g., the student says "B" for "D".b. The student stops or struggles with a letter for 3
seconds.c. The student omits a letter.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Articulation and Dialect
Articulation and Dialect. The student is not penalized for imperfect pronunciation due to dialect, articulation, or second language interference. For example, if the student consistently says /th/ for /s/ and pronounces "thee" for "see" when naming the letter "C", he or she should be given credit for correct letter naming. This is a professional judgment and should be based on the student's responses and any prior knowledge of his/her speech patterns.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Scoring Notes
If a student skips an entire row, draw a line through the row and do not count the row as correct.
Upper case letter “i” and lower case letter “L” are hard to differentiate. A response of either “i” or “L” is scored as correct.
If a student makes an error and corrects him/herself within 3 seconds, write "SC" above the letter and do not count it as an error.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Time to Practice!
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
DIBELSTM Oral Reading Fluency (DORF)
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A., & Dill, S. (2002). DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency. In R. H. Good & R. A. Kaminski (Eds.), Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available: http://dibels.uoregon.edu/.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Oral Reading Fluency
Develop irregular words and sight words Improve decoding skills Build fluent reading of text Activate and build prior knowledge Develop comprehension strategies
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Materials
Student copy of passage
Examiner copy
Clipboard
Timer
Colored pen
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Directions for Administration
1. Place the reading passage in front of the student.
2. Place the examiner copy on clipboard and position so that the student cannot see what you record.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Directions
3. Say these specific directions to the student:
Please read this (point)
out loud. If you get stuck, I will tell you the word so you can keep reading. When I say, “stop” I may ask you to tell me about what you read, so do your best reading. Start here (point to the first word of the passage). Begin.
Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills University of Oregon
First Grade Benchmark 2 – DIBELS Oral Reading Fluency, Passage 1
The Robin’s Nest
There was a robin’s nest outside our kitchen window. The
nest was in a tall bush. The mother robin sat in the nest all day
long. One day when I was watching, the mother bird flew
away. I saw the eggs she was sitting on. There were four blue
eggs.
I watched and watched. The eggs moved. I watched some
more. The eggs started to crack. Finally, the eggs hatched. I
saw four baby birds. The baby birds opened their beaks wide.
I heard them peeping. Soon the mother bird came back. Then
the mother robin put worms in their mouths.
Every day I watched the baby birds and their mother.
Pretty soon the babies were so fat there was no room for the
mother. Then one morning the nest was gone from the bush.
© 2001 Good & Kaminski Page 6
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Timing
4. Start your stopwatch when the student says the first word of the passage. The title is not counted. If the student fails to say the first word after 3 seconds, tell them the word and mark it as incorrect, then start your stopwatch.
5. The maximum time for each word is 3 seconds. If the student does not provide the word within 3 seconds, say the word and mark the word as incorrect.
6. At the end of 1 minute, place a bracket ( ] ) after the last word provided by the student and say “Stop.” Record the total number of words read correctly on the bottom of the scoring sheet.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Scoring
7. Follow along on the examiner copy of the probe. Put a slash ( ) over words read incorrectly.
8. Score reading passages immediately after administration.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Directions for Scoring
1. Hesitate or struggle with words. If a student hesitates or struggles with a word for 3 seconds, tell the student the word and mark the word as incorrect. If necessary, indicate for the student to continue with the next word.
Passage Student Says Scoring
Procedure Correct Words / Total Words
I have a goldfish. “I have a … (3 seconds)”
I have a goldfish. 3 /4
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Hyphenated Words
2. Hyphenated words. Hyphenated words count as two words if both parts can stand alone as individual words. Hyphenated words count as one word if either part cannot stand alone as an individual word.
Passage Number of
Words
I gave Ben a red yo-yo.
We did push-ups, pull-ups, and sit-ups.
6
9
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Numerals
3. Numerals. Numerals must be read correctly in the context of the sentence.
Passage Student Says Scoring
Procedure Correct Words / Total Words
My father is 36.
My father is 36.
I am 6 years old.
“My father is thirty-six.”
“My father is three six.”
“I am six years old.”
My father is 36.
My father is 36.
I am 6 years old.
4 /4
3 /4
5 /5
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Mispronounced Words
4. Mispronounced words. A word is scored as correct if it is pronounced correctly in the context of the sentence. If the word is mispronounced in the context, it is scored as an error.
Passage Student Says Scoring Procedure Correct Words / Total Words
Dad read the paper.
I ate too much.
“Dad reed the paper.” (i.e., long e)
“I eat too much.”
Dad read the paper.
I ate too much.
3 /4
3 /4
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Self Corrections
5. Self Corrections. A word is scored as correct if it is initially mispronounced but the student self corrects within 3 seconds. Mark SC above the word and score as correct.
Passage Student Says Scoring
Procedure Correct Words / Total Words
Dad read the paper.
“Dad reed … red the paper.” (i.e., self-corrects to short e)
Dad read the paper.
4 /4
SC
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Repeated Words
6. Repeated Words. Words that are repeated are not scored as incorrect and are ignored in scoring.
Passage Student Says Scoring
Procedure Correct Words / Total Words
I have a goldfish. “I have a … I have a goldfish.”
I have a goldfish. 4 /4
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Articulation and Dialect7. Articulation and dialect. The student is not penalized for
imperfect pronunciation due to dialect, articulation, or second language interference. For example, if the student consistently says /th/ for /s/, and reads “rest” as “retht,” he or she should be given credit for a correct word. This is a professional judgment and should be based on the student’s responses and any prior knowledge of his/her speech patterns.
Passage Student Says Scoring Procedure Correct Words / Total Words
It is time for a rest. We took the short cut.
“It is time for a retht.” (articulation) “We took the shot cut.” (dialect)
It is time for a rest. We took the short cut.
6 /6
5 /5
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Inserted Words8. Inserted words. Inserted words are ignored and
not counted as errors. The student also does not get additional credit for inserted words. If the student frequently inserts extra words, note the pattern at the bottom of the scoring page.
Passage Student Says Scoring Procedure Correct Words / Total Words
It is time for a rest.
I ate too much.
“It is time for a long rest.”
“I ate way too much.”
It is time for a rest.
I ate too much.
6 /6
4 /4
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Omitted Words
9. Omitted words. Omitted words are scored as incorrect.
Passage Student Says Scoring Procedure Correct Words / Total Words
It is time for a
rest.
I ate too
much.
“It is time for
rest.”
“I ate much.”
It is time for a rest.
I ate too much.
5 /6
3 /4
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Word Order
10. Word Order. All words that are read correctly but in the wrong order are scored as incorrect.
Passage Student Says Scoring Procedure Correct Words / Total Words
The ice cream
man comes.
I ate too much.
“The cream ice
man comes.”
“I too ate much.”
The ice cream man comes.
I ate too much.
3 /5
2 /4
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Abbreviations11. Abbreviations. Abbreviations should be read in
the way you would normally pronounce the abbreviation in conversation. For example, TV could be read as “teevee” or “television” but Mr. would be read as “mister.”
Passage Student Says Scoring Procedure Correct Words / Total Words
May I watch TV?
May I watch TV?
My teacher is Mr. Smith.
My teacher is Mr. Smith.
“May I watch teevee?”
“May I watch television?”
“My teacher is mister Smith.”
“My teacher is ‘m’ ‘r’ Smith.”
May I watch TV?
May I watch TV?
My teacher is Mr. Smith.
My teacher is Mr. Smith.
4 /4
4 /4
5 /5
4 /5
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Skipped Text
If a student skips a line of text, draw a line through the skipped text and do not count the skipped text in scoring.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
DORF Score
The score is the median (or middle) score when three passages are administered for screening purposes.
During progress monitoring, only one passage is administered.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Time to Practice!
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Acknowledgements
Centers for Implementing K-3 Behavior and Reading Intervention Models
Preventing Reading Difficulties: A Three-Tiered Intervention Model
U.S. Department of Education grant contract number H324X010013
Principal Investigator: Sharon Vaughn, Ph. D. Co-Principal Investigators: Sylvia Linan-Thompson,
Ph. D. and Batya Elbaum, Ph. D.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Different Levels of Use
State level District level School level
Classroom level Individual student level
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Classroom Level
Screening Progress Monitoring
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Screening
Conduct screening assessments 3 times per year in first grade and above (beginning, middle, and end of the year)
Conduct screening assessments 2 times per year in kindergarten (middle and end of the year)
Assess all students on appropriate measures
Examine students’ scores in relationship to established goals
Use to help inform both whole group and small group instruction
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Initial Screening: DIBELSTM Goals
Measure Goal When?
Initial Sounds Fluency 25 or more Middle of K
Letter Naming Fluency27 or more37 or more
Middle of KBeginning of 1st
Phonemic SegmentationFluency
18 or more35 or more
Middle of KBeginning of 1st
Nonsense Word Fluency13 or more24 or more
Middle of KBeginning of 1st
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Screening: Kindergarten ExampleLNF Goal NWF Goal ISF Goal PSF Goal
27 or more 13 or more 25 or more 18 or more
Date: __1/15/04_
StudentName
LetterNamingFluency
NonsenseWord
Fluency
InitialSoundsFluency
PhonemeSegmentation
Fluency
Comments/Error Patterns
Tashaun 57 33 48 17 d/b mix up; u/n mix up; good w/sounds/names; good initial sounds
Olivia 51 22 38.2 39
Leta 51 5 9.7 2 Rhymes words not segment; slow w/letter sounds
Delia 50 29 26.7 21
Edna 47 16 22.9 6 Can only segment initial sounds in PA
Tyson 47 25 10.3 5 Only segments initial sounds in PA SLOWLY
Naomi 46 19 40.9 63
Anya 45 25 33.6 46 d/b mix up; fairly fluent names/sounds/good PA skills
Essence 42 22 30 11 Only segments initial sounds in PA; slow but accurate letter names
William 40 17 20.8 3 Only segments initial sounds in PA
Destiny 37 3 12.7 30 Fairly high PA; slow w/letter names/sounds; vowel sound problems
David 33 25 30 56
Matt 26 10 18 9 Only segments initial sounds in PA; getting lots of letters mixed up
Edwin 18 2 0 2No response during PA; knows letters in his name and a fewothers
Chris 17 12 9.7 0 No response during PA; problems w/h,n,x,z,v; fair w/sounds
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Using Data to Inform Instruction Examine class as a whole to inform whole
group instruction
Examine groups of students to inform small group instruction
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Whole Class Instruction: Kindergarten Example 80% of the students in this class met the goal
of naming 27 letters or more in one minute
Tier 1 (core) instruction in this area is meeting its goal
40% of the students met the goal of segmenting 18 sounds or more in one minute
Tier 1 instruction in this area is NOT meeting its goal
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Small Group Instruction: Kindergarten Example Small group to help the 20% in letter naming:
Chris, Edwin, Matt
Small groups to help the 60% in phonological awareness: Chris, Edwin, Leta William, Tyson, Edna, Matt Essence, Tashaun, Delia
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Screening: First Grade ExampleLNF Goal NWF Goal PSF Goal
37 or more 24 or more 35 or moreDate: _9/5/03_
StudentName
Letter NamingFluency
Nonsense WordFluency
PhonemeSegmentation
Fluency
OralReadingFluency
Comments/Error Patterns
Natalia 72 50 56Felicia 54 37 59 Mix up on b/dClarissa 42 36 31 Slow but accurate PAJ ade 54 33 39 Mix up on b/dAaron 39 32 38Rey 24 25 0 No response on PA; accurate sound id on NWFLarah 37 23 38 Mix up in e/i and o/u and b/d sounds on NWFGerry 35 23 11 Only initial sounds on PA; accurate but not fluent on NWFChris 33 21 52 Accurate but not fluent on NWFJ ay 36 18 36 Mixes up all vowel sounds on NWFTina 38 18 44 Mix up on e/i and g/j and z/v and b/d on NWF
Alex 31 12 8Only initial sounds on PA; mixes up o/u and c/s and v/z;does not know sounds for f,t,r
Angela 25 12 29Problems w/vowel sounds on PA; mixes up all vowelsounds on NWF
Antwon 18 7 6Only responds to hard sounds on PA; knows sounds for a,m, s, t
Delia 10 4 8Dora 27 3 8Daniel 5 2 22 Problems with vowel sounds on PAEliza 1 1 1Rodney 0 0 0*Fluency rate is optional and not typically calculated at the beginning of first grade.
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Whole Class Instruction: First Grade Example 35% of the students in this class met the goal of reading 24
sounds or more in one minute
40% of the students met the goal of segmenting 35 sounds in one minute
Tier 1 instruction will need to be as good as it possibly can be to catch these students up
Tier 2 instruction (intervention) may be necessary for some students who do not make adequate progress in Tier 1
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Small Group Instruction: First Grade Example Small groups to help the 65% in letter-sound
correspondences: Rodney, Eliza, Daniel Dora, Delia, Antwon Angela, Alex, Tina, Jay Chris, Gerry, Larah, Rey
Small groups to help the 60% in phonological awareness: Rodney, Eliza, Rey Antwon, Alex, Dora, Delia Gerry, Daniel, Angela, Clarissa
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Progress Monitoring
Conduct progress monitoring assessments every 2-3 weeks
Assess only students who do not meet goals on appropriate screening measures
Examine students’ scores to look for progress in meeting established goals
Use to help inform both whole group and small group instruction
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Next Screening: DIBELSTM Goals
Measure Goal When?
Letter Naming Fluency 40 or more End of K
Phonemic SegmentationFluency
35 or moreEnd of K
Middle of First
Nonsense Word Fluency25 or more50 or more
End of KMiddle of First
Oral Reading Fluency 20 or more Middle of First
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Progress Monitoring: Kindergarten LNF Example
Student 28-Jan 13-Feb 27-Feb 9-Mar 26-Mar 2-Apr 23-Apr MayAnya 45 54Chris 17 34 38 34David 33 46Delia 50 55Destiny 37 34Edna 47 54Edwin 18 25 26 25 28 32 31Essence 42 46Tashaun 57 59Leta 51 63Matt 26 30 32 27 25 30 26Naomi 46 63Olivia 51 61Tyson 47 51William 40 57Taylor 49
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Progress Monitoring: Kindergarten PSF ExampleStudent 28-Jan 13-Feb 27-Feb 9-Mar 26-Mar 2-Apr 23-Apr MayAnya 46 67Chris 0 0 3 0 5 0 7 10David 56 57Delia 21 17Destiny 30 57Edna 6 7 12 20 18 17 51Edwin 2 2 4 7 7 10 19Essence 11 11 16 18 13 13 46Tashaun 17 9 17 15 13 20Leta 2 5 0 0 4 11 12Matt 9 9 9 10 8 7 13Naomi 63 70Olivia 39 24Tyson 5 8 11 3 5 8 8William 3 9 12 13 11 8 17Taylor 37
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Progress Monitoring: First Grade NWF Example
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Individual Level
Screening
Progress Monitoring
Error Analysis
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Initial Screening: Kindergarten Example
Student: ___William_________________________________
Middle of the Year Administration Date: ___1/15/04_____
Middle of the Year
Assessment Concept Assessed Score Decision CriteriaEstablished
( √ )Emerging( √ )
Deficit( √ )
Screenin 1g Lette r Namin gFluency 40> 27 = Established
27 > LN F < 21 = Emerging< 21 = Deficit
√
Screenin 2gNonsense Word
Fluency17
> 13 = Established13 > N WF < 4 = Emerging
< 4 = Deficit√
Screenin 3g Initial Soun ds Fluency 20.8> 25 = Established
25 > I SF< 9 = Emerging< 9 = Deficit
√
Screenin 4gPhonem e Segmentation
Fluency3
> 18 = Established18 > P SF< 7 = Emerging
< 7 = Deficit√
Commen /tsErro r Pattern :s ___Only segments initial s oundsi nPA____
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Initial Screening: Kindergarten Example
Student: ___Anya____________________________________
Middle of the Year Administration Date: ___1/15/04_____
Middle of the Year
Assessment Concept Assessed Score Decision CriteriaEstablished
( √ )Emerging( √ )
Deficit( √ )
Screenin 1g Lette r Namin gFluency 45> 27 = Established
27 > LN F < 21 = Emerging< 21 = Deficit
√
Screenin 2gNonsense Word
Fluency25
> 13 = Established13 > N WF < 4 = Emerging
< 4 = Deficit√
Screenin 3g Initial Soun ds Fluency 33.6> 25 = Established
25 > I SF< 9 = Emerging< 9 = Deficit
√
Screenin 4gPhonem e Segmentation
Fluency46
> 18 = Established18 > P SF< 7 = Emerging
< 7 = Deficit√
Commen /tsErro r Pattern :s _d/ bmix up; fairly flue nt name /s sounds; good PA skills_
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Initial Screening: Kindergarten Example
Student: ______Edna_________________________________
Middle of the Year Administration Date: ___1/15/04_____
Middle of the Year
Assessment Concept Assessed Score Decision CriteriaEstablished
( √ )Emerging( √ )
Deficit( √ )
Screenin 1g Lette r Namin gFluency 47> 27 = Established
27 > LN F < 21 = Emerging< 21 = Deficit
√
Screenin 2gNonsense Word
Fluency16
> 13 = Established13 > N WF < 4 = Emerging
< 4 = Deficit√
Screenin 3g Initial Soun ds Fluency 22.9> 25 = Established
25 > I SF< 9 = Emerging< 9 = Deficit
√
Screenin 4gPhonem e Segmentation
Fluency6
> 18 = Established18 > P SF< 7 = Emerging
< 7 = Deficit√
Commen /tsErro r Pattern :s _Can onl ysegmen t initia l sounds in PA_
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Initial Screening: First Grade Example
Student: ___Tina____________________________________
Beginning of the Year Administration Date: ___9/5/03_____
Beginning of the Year
Assessment Concept Assessed Score Decision CriteriaEstablished
( √ )Emerging( √ )
Deficit( √ )
Screenin 1g Lette r Namin gFluency 38> 37 = Established
37 > LN F < 24 = Emerging< 24 = Deficit
√
Screenin 2gNonsense Word
Fluency18
> 24 = Established24 > N WF < 12 = Emerging
< 12 = Deficit√
Screenin 3gPhonem e Segmentation
Fluency44
> 35 = Established35 > P SF< 9 = Emerging
< 9 = Deficit√
Commen /tsErro r Pattern :s __Mix up on e/i and g/j and z/v and b/d on NWF__
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Initial Screening: First Grade Example
Student: ___Angela__________________________________
Beginning of the Year Administration Date: ___9/5/03_____
Beginning of the Year
Assessment Concept Assessed Score Decision CriteriaEstablished
( √ )Emerging( √ )
Deficit( √ )
Screenin 1g Lette r Namin gFluency 25> 37 = Established
37 > LN F < 24 = Emerging< 24 = Deficit
√
Screenin 2gNonsense Word
Fluency12
> 24 = Established24 > N WF < 12 = Emerging
< 12 = Deficit√
Screenin 3gPhonem e Segmentation
Fluency29
> 35 = Established35 > P SF< 9 = Emerging
< 9 = Deficit√
Commen /tsErro r Pattern :s Problem s w/vowel s ounds on PA; mix up vowe l sounds onNWF
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Initial Screening: First Grade Example
Student: ___Antwon__________________________________
Beginning of the Year Administration Date: ___9/5/03_____
Beginning of the Year
Assessment Concept Assessed Score Decision CriteriaEstablished
( √ )Emerging( √ )
Deficit( √ )
Screenin 1g Lette r Namin gFluency 18> 37 = Established
37 > LN F < 24 = Emerging< 24 = Deficit
√
Screenin 2gNonsense Word
Fluency7
> 24 = Established24 > N WF < 12 = Emerging
< 12 = Deficit√
Screenin 3gPhonem e Segmentation
Fluency6
> 35 = Established35 > P SF< 9 = Emerging
< 9 = Deficit√
Commen /tsErro r Pattern :s Only res pondst o har ds ounds on PA; knows sounds for a, ,ms, t
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Progress Monitoring: Kindergarten LNF Examples
Matt 26 30 32 27 25 30 26
Student 28-Jan 13-Feb 27-Feb 9-Mar 26-Mar 2-Apr 23-Apr May
Edwin 18 25 26 25 28 32 31
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Progress Monitoring: Kindergarten PSF Examples
William 3 9 12 13 11 8 17
Edna 6 7 12 20 18 17 51
Student 28-Jan 13-Feb 27-Feb 9-Mar 26-Mar 2-Apr 23-Apr May
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Progress Monitoring: First Grade NWF Examples
Tina 18 12 26 25 37 31 44
Student 24-Sep 17-Oct 31-Oct 14-Nov 21-Nov 5-Dec 12-Dec 14-Jan 27-Jan
Angela 12 24 20 22 23 19 28 40 40
Antwon 7 20 33 35 38 52
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Progress Monitoring: First Grade NWF Examples
Student 24-Sep 17-Oct 31-Oct 14-Nov 21-Nov 5-Dec 12-Dec 14-Jan 27-Jan
Delia 4 11 18 18 13 8 9 15
Dora 3 17 14 36 28 33 37 32
(c) 2002 Good & Kaminski
Error Analysis
Using scored protocols to determine error patterns
Used to inform whole group and small group instruction
Examples: PSF - students provide initial sound only NWF - students confuse letter sounds
DIBELSTM: Overview and Use
Kim Rodriguez & Thea Woodruff
University of Texas
Center for Reading and Language Arts
Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement. Available:
http://dibels.uoregon.edu/.