Date post: | 19-Mar-2019 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | truongthuy |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
364.8
Introduction
S. Dietrich , W. L. Neuhuber , C. Scherzinger ,R. Ringler1,2 2 1 3 cerboMed GmbH, Erlangen, Germany
Institute of Anatomy, Department I, University of Erlangen, GermanyDept. of Medical Physics, Clinical Center Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
1)
2)
3)
Methods
�
�
�
�
�
12 subjects - 11 males, 1 female (27.1 ± 5.1 years, )
electrical stimulation of: N. Vagus, N. mentalis and N. trigeminus
mean ± SD
individual threshold determination for each stimulation site and subject
fMRI BOLD imaging with standard block design
data evaluation with Brain Voyager QX® (Brain Innovations,Netherlands, www.brainvoyager.com)
Subjects and stimulation
fMRI data evaluation and statistical analysis
Conclusions
fMRI of N. vagus, facialis and trigeminus stim
� Transcutaneous nerve stimulation is a safe method to stimulatecranial nerves without the risks of invasive techniques
BOLD fMRI results could be obtained for transcutaneous non-invasive stimulation of N. vagus, N. trigeminus and N. facialis
�
transcutaneous nerve stimulation - t-VNS
1) Pre-processing of the fMRI-EPI data by:
3D-motion correction with a trilinear interpolation
Slice scan time correction with a sinc interpolation
Temporal smoothing, by a) linear trend removal, b) high pass filter
2)
3) Transformation of each subject 3D-MPRAGE data set to Tailarach space
4) GLM multi study with z-transformation
5) Statistical significance of activated clusters by p < 0.005
6) Anatomical assignment of activated areas by averaged brain analysiswith “Tailarach Daemon” in combination with standard anatomicalatlas
�
�
�
Coregistration of functional EPI experiment to individual
3D-MPRAGE data set [voxel size: mm³]1x1x1
Comparison of stimulation sides
Acknowledgement Supported by cerboMed GmbH, Germany, Grant Mr002
Non-invasive electrical nerve stimulation of Ramus auricularis nervi vagi, N. facialis and N.mentalis results in nerve-specific brainstem and cerebral activations examined by BOLD fMRI
email: [email protected] [email protected] for Neuroscience, 38 Annual Meeting, 2008, Washingtonth
Experimental protocol
Anatomical setup:
Application of electrical, non-painful stimuli to
a) N. vagus at the inner side of the tragus
b) N. facialis close to the stylomastoid foramen
c) origin of the N. mentalis above the mental
foramen
fMRI - experimental setup:
Application of electrical stimuliin a block design with 4 stimulus periods of 30sec and alternating rest periods of 60 secEPI-Parameters:TR: 5000 ms for 36 slices, voxel: 4x4x3.75mm³, FOV: 256x256TR:110 ms/slice, TE=60 ms, flip angle=90°
transcutaneously
Results: N. trigeminus stimulationResults: N. facialis stimulation
N. mentalis stimulation leads to a
prominent activation in
Lobulus semilunaris
inferior right, Tonsille left,bilateral
Culmen
ventral tegmentum (rvT),
right Globus pallidus medialis
Nucleus ventralis lateralis,
Capsula interna,
Bilateral: insula cortex, gyrus
temporalis superior BA 22,
Right side: Gyrus precentralis BA 6,
Gyrus frontalis medialis BA 10 and
BA 43 and BA 2 Gyrus postcentralis
Cerebellum:
Brain stem:
Thalamus:
Left side: BA 40
Gyrus postcentralis
Electrical stimulus of the N. facialis
leads to significant BOLD-activation
in cerebellum und brain stem as well
as subcortical and cortical brain
areas. In detail:
obus posterior, regio Declive
(rD) and right Culmen of
lobus anterior.
Substantia nigra (rSN)
bilateral Nucleus dorsalis
medialis
anterior insula
BA 45, BA 9, g
Lobus
parietalis inferior (Ba40).
Cerbellum:
Brain stem:
Thalamus:
Left:
Bilateral:
R igh t :
regio Pyramis vermis
(rPv) in l
bilateral
BA 9 in gyrus frontalis medialis,
Capsula interna
yrus
praecentralis, gyrus occipitalis
medialis, cingulate cortex,
�
�
Comparison of BOLD activation pattern evidenced nerve-specific signal processing in the brain
Our experimental design could supplement the current mainlydescriptive anatomical understanding of cranial nerves signalprocessing with functional mode-of-action parameter.
Comparisons of healthy functional data with pathological datacould lead to better treatment options in cranial nervedisorders
�
Invasive neurostimulation has proven to be effective, but its clinical use islimited by a variety of reasons such as negative side-effects or high costs.Therefore, non-invasive stimulation methods are of increased interest. Ourresearch has focused on transcutaneous and non-invasive stimulation ofN. vagus, N. facialis and N. mentalis (trigeminus). BOLD fMRI was used todetect potential nerve-specific activation cluster in the brainstem, subcorticaland cortical brain areas during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.
Two main questions were addressed with this work:
�
�
Is BOLD fMRI a feasible method to study the cerebral processing oftranscutaneously applied stimuli of N. vagus, N. facialis and N.trigeminus?
Does nerve-specific transcutaneous non-invasive stimulation lead tonerve-specific BOLD action cluster in the brain?
1:00 1:30 2:30 3:00 4:00 4:30 5:30 6:00 time [min]
baseline
stimulus
baseline
stimulus
baseline
stimulus
baseline
stimulus
baseline
Literature
� Dietrich S, Smith J, Scherzinger C, Hoffmann-Preiß K, Freitag T,Eisenkolb A, Ringler R. A novel transcutaneous vagus nervestimulation leads to brainstem activations measured byfunctional MRI. Biomed Tech 2008;53(3):104-111.
Most significant activation in cerebellum (regio Pyramis vermis t = 6.404, p<0.000000;Lobus posterior regio Declive right t = 5.724, p<0.000000) and right g. frontalis inferiorBA 45 (t = 5.588, p<0.000000) and right g. praecentralis BA 4 (t = 5.081, p<0.000002).
Most prominent clusters on a high significance level were found in Insula cortex
(t = 4.685,p<0.000011), right g.temporalis superior (t = 5.274, p<0.000001),
right g. praecentralis (t = 5.336, p<0.000001), right g. postcentralis (t= 6.188,
p<0.000000) and right g. frontalis medialis (t = 5.945, p<0.000000).
Results: N. vagus stimulation
A prominent activation in contra
lateral pontine tegmentum and right
due to
stimulation of vagal afferent fibers of
the outer ear canal (RANV).
:
regio Nucleus dentatus
rechts (rNd), regio Uvula Vermis
(rUV), Lobus posterior cerebelli
regio Declive (rD) bilateral)
Locus coeruleus,
pontine Tegmentum, Region of
Nucleus
subthalamicus (rNS),
Nucleus ventralis lateralis
of the Thalamus,
dorsal parts of the
Putamen, Amygdala of Gyrus
parah ippocampal is ,
regio Locus coeruleus (rLC)
dorsolateral
prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC)
Cingulate Gyrus,
Insula, Gyrus frontalis superior, S1-
Cortex
Cuneus
located in Lobus occipitalis.
Further activaed areas are
Cerebellum:
Right side:
Bilateral:
Left side:
White cross:(x=8, y=-28, z=-22)
regio Locus coeruleus / regiopontines Tegmentum
Best Match
Red circle:(x=8, y=-13, z=-5)3rd Best Matchregio Nuc. subthalamicus (rNs)Subthalamus / right
Anatomical region of the brain
(Total of N = 12 subjects)Statistical values Talairach-
Coordinates
Level 1 S Level 2 Level 3 BM t-values p-values x y z
Cerebellum r Lobus posterior rNd * 2.97 0.003801 18 -48 -32
m * rUV 2nd 3.991 0.000143 -2 -62 -27
r Lobus posterior rD 2nd 4.096 0.000098 30 -57 -22
l Lobus posterior rD 1st 4.224 0.000062 -26 -65 -22
Truncus cerebri r Pons rLC/rpT * 3.273 0.001561 8 -28 -22
Subthalamus r * rNS 3rd 3.185 0.002045 8 -13 -5
Thalamus r Nucleus ventralis lateralis * 1st 3.106 0.002607 12 -10 9
l Nucleus ventralis lateralis * 1st 3.408 0.000522 -11 -13 9
Nucleus lentiforme l Putamen * 2nd 3.114 0.002546 -32 -8 -1
Lobus limbicus l Gyrus parahippocampalis rA 2nd 3.386 0.001090 -26 -4 -11
r Gyrus cinguli anterior BA24 4th 3.008 0.003490 10 23 29
l Gyrus cinguli BA24 2nd 3.122 0.002485 -6 -16 34
Insula r * BA13+ 2nd 5.288 0.000001 34 16 6
l * BA13+ 2nd 5.704 0.000000 -34 21 6
Lobus frontalis rGyrus frontalis medialis/
DLPFCBA46 3rd 6.290 0.000000 41 44 13
lGyrus frontalis superior/
OFCBA10 2nd 5.228 0.000001 -36 44 22
r Gyrus frontalis superior BA8 1st 4.974 0.000004 4 30 44
Lobus parietalis rGyrus postcentralis / S1-
KortexBA2 4th 5.890 0.000000 52 -25 29
Lobus occipitalis l Cuneus BA19 1st 4.185 0.000071 -10 -88 29
Anatomical region of the brain
(Total of N = 12 subjects)Statistical values Talairach-
Coordinates
Level 1 S Level 2 Level 3 BM t-values p-values x y z
Cerebellum m Lobus posterior [rPV] 3rd 6.404 0.000000 -1 -71 -31
r Lobus posterior [rD] * 5.724 0.000000 19 -77 -31
l Lobus posterior [rD] * 4.571 0.000017 -18 -75 -31
r Lobus anterior Culmen 1st 4.227 0.000061 35 -56 -23
Truncus cerebri r * rSN 4th 3.280 0.001526 4 -21 -11
Thalamus r Nucleus dorsalis medialis * 1st 3.576 0.000588 9 -16 6
l Nucleus dorsalis medialis * 1st 3.331 0.001300 -10 -16 11
Insula r * BA13+ 3rd 4.513 0.000021 38 19 -2
l * BA13+ 1st 4.8497 0.000005 -44 12 -1
Lobus frontalis r Gyrus frontalis inferior BA45 7th 5.588 0.000000 44 16 0
r Gyrus frontalis inferior BA9 6th 3.473 0.000824 38 8 30
l Gyrus frontalis medialis BA9 3rd 4.713 0.000010 -44 11 30
r Gyrus praecentralis BA4 9th 5.081 0.000002 56 -21 31
Extra-Nuclear l Capsula interna * * 4.260 0.00054 -18 9 11
Lobus occipitalis r Gyrus occipitalis medialis BA19 2nd -4.515 0.000021 35 -83 14
Lobus limbicus r Gyrus cinguli BA32 1st 3.499 0.000758 9 20 36
Lobus parietalis r Lobus parietalis inferior BA40 1st 4.148 0.000081 59 -34 41
Abbreviations: rPV = regio Pyramis vermis, rD = regio Declive, rSN = regio Substantia nigra, BM = Best match
Anatomical region of the brain
(Total of N = 12 subjects)Statistical values Talairach-
Coordinates
Level 1 S Level 2 Level 3 BM t-values p-values x y z
Cerebellum r Lobus posterior LSI 1st 2.980 0.003788 19 -67 -38
l Lobus posterior Tonsille 1st 3.561 0.000619 -29 -57 -38
m * Culmen 1st 2.899 0.004800 0 -54 -19
Truncus cerebri l Pons rvT * 2.700 0.008418 -7 -26 -31
Nucleus lentiforme r Globus pallidus medialis * 3rd 4.576 0.000017 14 -10 -3
Thalamus r Nucleus ventralis lateralis * 5th 4.289 0.000049 15 -11 -1
l Nucleus ventralis lateralis * 6th 4.277 0.000051 -16 -11 -1
Extra-Nuclear l Capsula interna * * 3.603 0.000538 -26 -18 -1
Insula r * BA13+ 2nd 4.685 0.000011 38 2 -1
l * BA13+ 2nd 3.648 0.000462 -39 16 -1
Lobus temporalis r Gyrus temporalis superior BA22 1st 5.274 0.000001 53 9 -1
l Gyrus temporalis superior BA22 2nd 4.143 0.000083 -51 13 -1
Lobus frontalis r Gyrus praecentralis BA6 2nd 5.336 0.000001 50 -2 9
r Gyrus frontalis medialis BA10 2nd 5.945 0.000000 42 49 22
Lobus parietalis l Gyrus postcentralis BA40 2nd 4.156 0.000079 -58 -19 20
r Gyrus postcentralis BA43 2nd 6.188 0.000000 53 -13 16
r Gyrus postcentralis BA2 1st 4.555 0.000018 56 -26 37
Abbreviations: LSI = Lobulus semilunaris inferior, rvT = regio ventrales Tegmentum, BM = Best Match
N. VAGUS N. FACIALIS N.
TRIGEMINUS
(N. mentalis)
Anatomical region(N = 12)
Event Side Event Side Event Side
Cerebellum
Lobus posterior
rNd ↑ R
rUV ↑ M
rD ↑ B ↑ B
rPV ↑ M
Culmen ↑ R
LSI ↑ R
Tonsille ↑ L
Lobus anterior
Culmen ↑ M
Truncus cerebri
Pons
rLC / rpT ↑ R
rSN ↑ R
rVT ↑ L
Subthalamus
rNS ↑ R
Thalamus
Nucl. ventralis lat. ↑ B ↑ B
Nucl.dorsalis med. ↑ B
Nucl. lentiforme
Putamen ↑ L
Globus pallidus
med.↑ R
Extra-Nuclear
Capsula interna ↑ L ↑ L
N. VAGUS N. FACIALIS N.
TRIGEMINUS
(N. mentalis)
Lobus limbicus
Gyrus
parahippocampalis↑ L (rA)
Gyrus cingulianterior
↑R
(BA24)
Gyrus cinguli ↑L
(BA24)↑
R
(BA32)
Insula
* ↑B
(BA13)↑
B(BA13)
↑B
(BA13)
Lobus temporalis
Gyrus temporalissuperior
↑B
(BA22)
Lobus frontalis
Gyrus frontalis
medialis↑
R
(BA46)↑
L
(BA9)↑
R
(BA10)
[DLPFC] [↑] [R]
Gyrus frontalissuperior/ OFC
↑L
(BA10)
Gyrus frontalis
superior↑
R
(BA8)
Gyrus frontalisinferior
↑
R(BA45)
R
(BA9)
Gyrus
praecentralis↑
R
(BA4)↑
R
(BA6)
Lobus parietalis
Gyrus postcentralis/ S1-Kortex
↑R
(BA2)↑
R(BA2)
↑R
(BA43)
↑L
(BA40)
Lobus parietalis
inferior↑
R
(BA40)
Lobus occipitalis
Cuneus ↑L
(BA19)
Gyrus occipitalis
medialis↑
R
(BA19)
rLC = regio Locus coeruleus, rpT = regio pontines Tegmentum, rNd = region
Nucleus dentatus, rUV = regio Uvula vermis, rA = regio Amygdala, rD =
regio Declive, rNS = region Nucleus subthalamicus, BA = Brodmann Area,DLPFC = dorsolateraler präfrontaler Kortex, OFC = orbitofront aler Kortex,
LSI = Lobulus semilunaris inferior, rvT = regio ventrales Tegmentum, rPV =
regio Pyramis vermis, rD = regio Declive, rSN = regio Substantia nigra
t-VNS stimuation device, cerboMed GmbH,Erlangen, Germany