ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Different Gastric Mucosa and CagA Status of Patients in Indiaand Japan Infected with Helicobacter pylori
Keiichi Fujiya • Naoyoshi Nagata • Tomohisa Uchida • Masao Kobayakawa •
Naoki Asayama • Junichi Akiyama • Takuro Shimbo • Toru Igari •
Rupa Banerjee • D. Nageshwar Reddy • Masashi Mizokami • Naomi Uemura
Received: 29 August 2013 / Accepted: 14 November 2013 / Published online: 27 November 2013
� Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013
Abstracts
Background and Aim Despite similar incidence of Heli-
cobacter pylori infection, the frequency of gastric cancer is
sevenfold higher in Japan than in India. The objective of
this work was to define differences in H. pylori-induced
gastritis and to identify the bacterial virulence factors
involved.
Materials and Methods We prospectively enrolled 353
consecutive patients who underwent endoscopy and
received three gastric biopsies in Tokyo, Japan, and Hy-
derabad, India. Immunohistochemistry against H. pylori
and East Asian CagA and hematoxylin–eosin and Giemsa
stain were used to examine gastric mucosal biopsy speci-
mens. Histological scores were assessed in accordance with
the updated Sydney System. Subjects with H. pylori
infection were matched by age and sex to compare histo-
pathology and bacterial virulence.
Results Sixty patients infected with H. pylori were pro-
spectively selected. Median histological scores for neu-
trophil and mononuclear cell infiltration and for atrophy
were significantly higher in Japan than in India (neutrophils
4.0 vs 3.0, p \ 0.01; mononuclear cells 5.0 vs 4.5,
p = 0.03; atrophy 3.0 vs 2.0, p \ 0.01, respectively).
Scores for H. pylori density and intestinal metaplasia were
K. Fujiya � N. Nagata (&) � M. Kobayakawa � N. Asayama �J. Akiyama
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National
Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama,
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8655, Japan
e-mail: [email protected]
K. Fujiya
e-mail: [email protected]
M. Kobayakawa
e-mail: [email protected]
N. Asayama
e-mail: [email protected]
J. Akiyama
e-mail: [email protected]
T. Uchida
Department of Molecular Pathology, Oita University, 1-1
Hazamacho, Yufu City, Oita 879-5593, Japan
e-mail: [email protected]
T. Shimbo
Department of Clinical Research and Informatics, National
Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama,
Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8655, Japan
e-mail: [email protected]
T. Igari
Department of Clinical Pathology, National Center for Global
Health and Medicine, 1-21-1 Toyama, Shinjuku-ku,
Tokyo 162-8655, Japan
e-mail: [email protected]
R. Banerjee � D. N. Reddy
Department of Gastroenterology, Asian Institute of
Gastroenterology, 6-3-661 Somajiguda, Hyderabad 500082,
India
e-mail: [email protected]
D. N. Reddy
e-mail: [email protected]
M. Mizokami
The Research Center for Hepatitis and Immunology, Kohnodai
Hospital, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-7-1
Kohnodai, Ichikawa City, Chiba 272-8516, Japan
e-mail: [email protected]
N. Uemura
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kohnodai
Hospital, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, 1-7-1
Kohnodai, Ichikawa City, Chiba 272-8516, Japan
e-mail: [email protected]
123
Dig Dis Sci (2014) 59:631–637
DOI 10.1007/s10620-013-2961-x
also higher in Japan, albeit without statistical significance
(H. pylori 5.0 vs 3.0, p = 0.08; intestinal metaplasia 0.0 vs
0.0, p = 0.08). Prevalence of East Asian CagA-positive H.
pylori was significantly higher in Japan (73.3 vs 0.0 %,
p \ 0.01).
Conclusion The significantly higher prevalence of histo-
logically severe gastritis and East Asian CagA in patients
from Japan with H. pylori infection may be involved in the
pathogenesis of gastric cancer.
Keywords East Asian CagA � Endoscopy � Gastric
cancer risk � H. pylori-associated gastritis � Updated
Sydney System
Abbreviations
H. pylori Helicobacter pylori
CagA Cytotoxin-associated antigen A
NCGM National Center for Global Health and
Medicine
AIG Asian Institute of Gastroenterology
Introduction
Gastric cancer is the second most frequent cause of cancer
death, resulting in 600,000 deaths per year worldwide [1].
Death from gastric cancer is more common in Asia, par-
ticularly in China, Japan, and Korea, where the prevalence
of H. pylori infection is high [2]. The different incidence of
gastric cancer compared with other countries may be
affected by several factors, including the prevalence of H.
pylori infection [3], H. pylori-associated gastritis [4],
bacterial virulence [5], host genetic factors, and diet [6].
Comparative studies to evaluate differences in the devel-
opment of gastric cancer among countries have been con-
ducted [7–11]. Here, we focus specifically on the
differences between patients from India and Japan.
Although the prevalence of H. pylori infection is similar in
India and Japan, the prevalence of gastric cancer in Japan is
approximately seven times higher than that in India [2, 3].
We hypothesized that the difference in the development of
gastric cancer results from the difference in the severity of
H. pylori -induced gastric mucosal inflammation. Inflam-
mation of the gastric mucosa, which is usually assessed
histologically by use of the updated Sydney System [12], is
rare in subjects who are H. pylori-negative, and the inci-
dence of gastric cancer in these patients is extremely low
[4].
To compare gastric mucosal inflammation among
patients residing in different countries, it is important to
evaluate those infected with H. pylori. However, previous
histological comparisons of gastritis among countries
included subjects who were H. pylori-negative [9] or
unmatched for age or sex [8, 10, 11].
Here, we endoscopically and histologically evaluated
differences in gastric mucosal inflammation between sub-
jects in India and Japan with H. pylori infection. Further, to
assess gastric cancer risk, we also determined the presence
of the gene encoding the H. pylori virulence factor cyto-
toxin-associated antigen A (CagA) [13].
Methods
Subjects
The study was conducted under a prospective cross-sectional
two-center design for all adults undergoing diagnostic
endoscopy between December 2010 and March 2011 at the
Endoscopy Unit, National Center for Global Health and
Medicine (NCGM), Tokyo, Japan, and the Asian Institute of
Gastroenterology (AIG), Hyderabad, India. Inclusion crite-
ria were age 25–75 years, presence of dyspepsia, consecu-
tive scheduled upper gastrointestinal endoscopies, and
Japanese or Indian ethnicity. We excluded patients with a
history of H. pylori eradication and those with upper gas-
trointestinal surgery, concomitant severe illness, regular use
of aspirin, treatment with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs, or treatment with proton-pump inhibitors within four
weeks before enrollment. Endoscopic biopsy was performed
for all patients ultimately enrolled. The institutional review
boards of the NCGM and the AIG approved the study pro-
tocol. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects in
accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Endoscopy
All endoscopies were performed by experienced endosco-
pists. Endoscopic diagnosis included reflux esophagitis,
hyperplastic polyp, gastric ulcer, and duodenal ulcer.
Histology
Biopsy specimens were taken from three sites of the gastric
mucosa as follows: the greater curvature of the antrum, the
incisura angulus, and the greater curvature of the upper body.
Three biopsy specimens were taken from each patient. The
biopsied specimens were fixed in 10 % (v/v) formalin,
embedded in paraffin, stained with hematoxylin–eosin and
Giemsa, and analyzed immunohistochemically as described
elsewhere using a polyclonal anti-H. pylori antibody (Dako,
Glostrup, Denmark) and an anti-East Asian CagA-specific
antibody prepared in our laboratory (Fig. 1) [14]. The latter
632 Dig Dis Sci (2014) 59:631–637
123
mouse monoclonal antibody was raised against the peptide
AINRKIDRINKIASAGKG, which is specific to East Asian
CagA. Tissue sections from patients with Western CagA or
CagA-negative status do not react with this antibody. The
sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of this immunohisto-
chemical method were 96.7, 97.9, and 97.1 %, respectively
[15]. Slides were interpreted by an expert pathologist (T.U.)
who was not informed of the patients’ clinical and endo-
scopic findings.
Updated Sydney System Score
In accordance with the Updated Sydney System, a score of
0–3 (0, absent; 1, mild; 2, moderate; 3, marked) was
assigned for the variables as follows: H. pylori density,
neutrophil and mononuclear cell infiltration, glandular
atrophy, and intestinal metaplasia [16]. Scores for each of
the three biopsy specimens were summed, giving a possible
range in scores of 0–9. We calculated the corpus-pre-
dominant gastritis/antrum-predominant gastritis ratio from
the scores for neutrophil infiltration from the antrum and
from the upper body.
Assessment of H. pylori Status
Helicobacter pylori infection was evaluated by staining
tissue sections with hematoxylin–eosin and Giemsa com-
bined with immunostaining using antibodies against H.
pylori. When all of these methods yielded negative results,
H. pylori infection was considered negative.
Statistical Analysis
All statistical analysis was performed by use of SPSS
statistical software version 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).
Patient characteristics, endoscopic diagnosis, and CagA
status were compared by use of Fisher’s exact test. Total
histological scores between patients from India and Japan
were compared by use of the Mann–Whitney test.
Results
Patient Characteristics
Three-hundred and fifty-three patients who met the initial
set of inclusion criteria were examined by endoscopy
(Fig. 2). At the end of the selection process, 30 patients
from India were individually matched by age and sex with
30 from Japan. During the matching process, we regarded
the Indian patients as cases and randomly selected controls
from among Japanese patients according to sex and
decennial age. The characteristics of the 30 patients from
each country who met all of the inclusion criteria are
summarized in Table 1. There were no significant age or
sex differences between the two groups. The frequency of
reflux esophagitis was significantly higher in the Indian
group than in the Japanese group. There were no significant
differences in the other endoscopic findings, for example
gastric hyperplastic polyp, gastric ulcer, and duodenal
ulcer.
Severity of Gastritis
Among the 60 patients, median scores for H. pylori, neu-
trophils, mononuclear cells, atrophy, and intestinal meta-
plasia were 4.0, 4.0, 5.0, 3.0, and 0.0, respectively. The
scores for neutrophils, mononuclear cells, and atrophy were
significantly higher for subjects from Japan (neutrophils
4.0 vs 3.0, p \ 0.01; mononuclear cells 5.0 vs 4.5,
p = 0.03; atrophy 3.0 vs 2.0, p \ 0.01) (Fig. 3). The scores
for H. pylori density and intestinal metaplasia were also
higher in patients from Japan but without statistical signifi-
cance (H. pylori 5.0 vs 3.0, p = 0.08; IM 0.0 vs 0.0, p =
0.08). The corpus-predominant gastritis/antrum-predominant
Fig. 1 Immunohistochemistry of gastric mucosa biopsy specimens with anti-Helicobacter pylori antibody (a) and anti-East Asian-specific
antibody (b)
Dig Dis Sci (2014) 59:631–637 633
123
gastritis ratio in Japan (0.75) was significantly higher than
that in India (0.55) (p \ 0.01).
CagA Status
Biopsies were analyzed with anti-East Asian CagA-specific
antibody against H. pylori. Twenty-two (73.3 %) samples
from patients from Japan were positive. In contrast, biop-
sies of all patients from India were negative (p \ 0.01).
Discussion
The incidence of gastric cancer in Africa (11.8/100,000)
and South Asia (10.7/100,000) is very low, although the
prevalence of H. pylori infection is high [2]. Even among
Asian countries where the prevalence of H. pylori infection
is high, the incidence of gastric cancer varies, and is higher
in East Asia (37.5/100,000) than in South (26.5/100,000)
and Central Asia (2.3/100,000) [3]. We speculated that this
difference is associated with bacterial virulence and the
host’s inflammatory response to H. pylori. Therefore, we
Fig. 2 Study flow chart. Three-hundred and fifty-three patients who met the initial set of inclusion criteria were examined by endoscopy. At the
end of the selection process, 30 patients from India were individually matched by age and sex with 30 from Japan
Table 1 Patient characteristics and endoscopic diagnosis
India
(n = 30)
Japan
(n = 30)
p value
Age (median (IQR)) 50.0 (36.5–59.0) 50 (38.3–54.3)
Sex (M/F) 16/14 16/14
Symptoms n (%)
Epigastric pain 7 (23.3) 7 (23.3) 0.54*
Reflux symptoms 22 (73.3) 0 (0) 0.01*
Bloating 8 (26.7) 0 (0) 0.02*
Other 12 (40) 4 (13.3) 0.13*
Endoscopic biopsy n (%) 30 (100) 30 (100)
Endoscopic findings n (%)
Reflux esophagitis 9 (30) 2 (6.7) 0.04*
Gastric hyperplastic
polyps
0 (0) 0 (0) N.A.
Active gastric ulcer 3 (10) 2 (6.7) 1.00*
Active duodenal ulcer 9 (30) 3 (10) 0.10*
Macroscopically
normal
14 (46.7) 23 (76.7) 0.03*
IQR interquartile range, N.A. not applicable
* Fisher’s exact test
634 Dig Dis Sci (2014) 59:631–637
123
assessed inflammation of the gastric mucosa by use of
endoscopy and histopathology. Endoscopic assessment
showed that the frequency of reflux esophagitis was sig-
nificantly higher in study patients from India than in those
from Japan. This suggests that reflux esophagitis correlates
with the high prevalence of increased acid secretion by the
gastric mucosa of patients from India. This assumption is
supported by the finding that pathological atrophy in
patients from India was mild, because severe atrophy
resulted in hypoacidity, because of reduced numbers of
parietal cells.
In contrast, even though gastric ulcer correlates posi-
tively with gastric cancer and is more prevalent in Japan
than in other Asian countries [17], our study showed no
significant difference between countries in ulcer preva-
lence. These results might be because of differences in
endoscopic diagnostic standards between the two countries.
Despite standard endoscopic diagnosis defining gastric
ulcer as a mucosal defect that is 3 mm or larger [18],
lesions that are typically diagnosed as erosions in Japan
might have been diagnosed as ulceration in India. Despite
efforts to ensure that endoscopic atrophic gastritis was
assessed in accordance with the classification of Kimura
and Takemoto [19], endoscopists in India might not be
sufficiently familiar with the classification of atrophic
borders to enable accurate assessment.
Gastric cancer may develop through H. pylori-related
chronic inflammation of the gastric mucosa followed by
atrophic gastritis, intestinal metaplasia, and dysplasia [20].
The development of gastric cancer is associated with
neutrophil infiltration [4], atrophy [21], and intestinal
metaplasia [21]. Several studies have evaluated differences
in the development of gastric cancer between countries, on
the basis of histological inflammation of the gastric mucosa
[7, 11, 22]. In their comparison of H. pylori-positive Tai-
wanese, Lithuanian, and Latvian subjects, Jonaitis et al.
[10] found no significant differences in atrophy or intesti-
nal metaplasia. In contrast, in a comparison of H. pylori-
positive Japanese, Korean, and American subjects, Lee
et al. [8] found that neutrophils, atrophy, and intestinal
metaplasia in the antrum were significantly more frequent
in Korea than in the United States. Naylor et al. [9] found
that corpus-predominant gastritis, pangastritis, severe
atrophy, and intestinal metaplasia were significantly more
frequent in subjects in Japan than in those in the United
Kingdom. Although the present study included a few H.
pylori-negative subjects, it matched subjects by age and
sex.
Fig. 3 Median histology scores for H. pylori-infected patients and
cumulative biopsy scores. a H. pylori density (p = 0.08), b neutrophil
infiltration (p \ 0.01), c mononuclear cell infiltration (p \ 0.01),
d glandular atrophy (p \ 0.01), and e intestinal metaplasia
(p = 0.08). The horizontal line inside each box indicates the median,
and the top and bottom of each box indicate the 25th and 75th
percentiles, respectively. The I bars indicate maximum and minimum
values
Dig Dis Sci (2014) 59:631–637 635
123
Similar studies have also been conducted among Asia
populations. In a comparison between Japanese and Indo-
nesian subjects who were H. pylori-positive, Abdullah
et al. [11] found that neutrophil and mononuclear cell
infiltration, atrophy, and intestinal metaplasia were more
frequent in Japanese patients. In a multilateral comparison
among Japanese (n = 120), Chinese (n = 105), Thai
(n = 145), and Vietnamese (n = 80) subjects matched by
age, sex, and endoscopic diagnosis, Matsuhisa et al. [7]
demonstrated that gastric ulcer, atrophy in the angulus, and
intestinal metaplasia were significantly more frequent in
Japan. These authors also demonstrated that the corpus-
predominant/antrum-predominant gastritis ratio was higher
in Japan than in China (Beijing), Thailand, and Vietnam
[22].
This study included only subjects who were H. pylori-
positive, and subjects were matched by age and sex. This
might have led to a more accurate comparison of gastritis.
Scores for inflammation of the gastric mucosa were sig-
nificantly higher in Japanese patients than in Indian
patients, which is consistent with the findings of other
studies of patients in Asia [7, 11, 22]. The results suggest
that this variable is associated with the high prevalence of
gastric cancer in Japan and reflects similar comparisons
between patients in Japan and those in other Asian
countries.
We show here that the prevalence of infection with East
Asian CagA-positive H. pylori was 73.3 % in Japan and
0 % in India. The cagA gene is polymorphic and is pri-
marily classified into East Asian and Western types
according to sequences located in the 30 coding region [23].
In East Asia, at least 90 % of H. pylori-positive subjects
are CagA-positive, versus approximately 40 % in the West
and Africa [24]. East Asian-type H. pylori is particularly
prevalent in Japan, Korea, and China, and less so in South
and Central Asia [25]. Gastritis, atrophy, and peptic ulcer
are more severe in subjects infected with East Asian CagA-
positive H. pylori than in subjects with Western CagA-
positive H. pylori or CagA-negative H. pylori, and mor-
tality from gastric cancer is 2.7-times higher [26]. There-
fore, East Asian CagA status may be an important
determinant of the differences in histology scores between
Indian and Japanese patients.
The strengths of this study include its exclusion of
patients with a history of H. pylori eradication [27], or with
regular use of aspirin [28], nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory
drugs, [29] or proton-pump inhibitors [30]. These drugs can
affect the gastric mucosa and preclude accurate assessment
of the inflammatory effects of H. pylori infection on the
gastric mucosa. Moreover, Giemsa staining and immuno-
histochemistry using anti-H. pylori antibody, with hema-
toxylin–eosin staining, facilitated more accurate diagnosis
of H. pylori infection. One limitation is that the inclusion of
patients positive only for H. pylori reduced the number of
subjects. Inclusion of a larger number of samples might
have enabled the detection of significant differences in H.
pylori density and intestinal metaplasia. Moreover, all
examinations of gastritis were performed by a gastroin-
testinal pathologist in Japan, and reproducibility could
therefore not be assessed. Another limitation is that
molecular genetic tests were not used to detect H. pylori
infection.
In conclusion, this study clarifies differences in H.
pylori-infected gastric mucosa between Indian and Japa-
nese patients matched for age and sex. The frequency of
reflux esophagitis was higher in patients from India. In
contrast, histology scores for H. pylori, neutrophil and
mononuclear cell infiltration, atrophy, and intestinal
metaplasia were higher in patients from Japan. East Asian
CagA-positive H. pylori was detected in patients from
Japan only. These differences may account for the different
incidence of gastric cancer in these two countries.
Acknowledgments This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid
from the Ministry of Health Labor and Welfare of Japan and a Grant-
in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and
Technology of Japan (271000) and a grant from the National Center
for Global Health and Medicine. The funders were not involved in
study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or
preparation of the manuscript. We thank Hisae Kawashiro, Clinical
Research Coordinator, NCGM, Tokyo, Japan, for assistance with data
collection. We express our sincere gratitude to Drs Anuradha Sekaran
and Mitnala Sasikala, AIG, Hyderabad, India for the pathological
specimens and blood samples.
Conflict of interest None.
References
1. Pisani P, Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J. Erratum: Estimates of the
worldwide mortality from 25 cancers in 1990. Int J Cancer.
1999;83:870–873.
2. Roder DM. The epidemiology of gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer.
2002;5:5–11.
3. Fock KM, Ang TL. Epidemiology of helicobacter pylori infection
and gastric cancer in Asia. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:
479–486.
4. Uemura N, Okamoto S, Yamamoto S, et al. Helicobacter pylori
infection and the development of gastric cancer. N Engl J Med.
2001;345:784–789.
5. Graham DY, Yamaoka Y. Disease-specific helicobacter pylori
virulence factors: the unfulfilled promise. Helicobacter. 2000;5:
S3–S9; (discussion S27–S31).
6. Joossens JV, Hill MJ, Elliott P, et al. Dietary salt, nitrate and
stomach cancer mortality in 24 countries. European cancer pre-
vention (ECP) and the INTERSALT cooperative research group.
Int J Epidemiol. 1996;25:494–504.
7. Matsuhisa TM, Yamada NY, Kato SK, Matsukura NM. Helico-
bacter pylori infection, mucosal atrophy and intestinal metaplasia
in Asian populations: a comparative study in age-, gender- and
endoscopic diagnosis-matched subjects. Helicobacter.. 2003;8:
29–35.
636 Dig Dis Sci (2014) 59:631–637
123
8. Lee I, Lee H, Kim M, et al. Ethnic difference of helicobacter
pylori gastritis: Korean and Japanese gastritis is characterized by
male- and antrum-predominant acute foveolitis in comparison
with American gastritis. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:94–98.
9. Naylor GM, Gotoda T, Dixon M, et al. Why does japan have a
high incidence of gastric cancer? Comparison of gastritis between
UK and japanese patients. Gut. 2006;55:1545–1552.
10. Jonaitis L, Ivanauskas A, Janciauskas D, et al. Precancerous
gastric conditions in high helicobacter pylori prevalence areas:
comparison between eastern European (lithuanian, latvian) and
asian (taiwanese) patients. Medicina (Kaunas).. 2007;43:623–629.
11. Abdullah M, Ohtsuka H, Rani AA, Sato T, Syam AF, Fujino MA.
Helicobacter pylori infection and gastropathy: a comparison
between Indonesian and Japanese patients. World J Gastroen-
terol. 2009;15:4928–4931.
12. Dixon MF, Genta RM, Yardley JH, Correa P. Classification and
grading of gastritis. The updated Sydney system. International
workshop on the histopathology of gastritis, Houston 1994. Am J
Surg Pathol. 1996;20:1161–1181.
13. Hatakeyama M. Helicobacter pylori and gastric carcinogenesis. J
Gastroenterol. 2009;44:239–248.
14. Uchida T, Kanada R, Tsukamoto Y, et al. Immunohistochemical
diagnosis of the cagA-gene genotype of helicobacter pylori with anti-
east Asian CagA-specific antibody. Cancer Sci. 2007;98:521–528.
15. Nguyen LT, Uchida T, Kuroda A, et al. Evaluation of the anti-
east Asian CagA-specific antibody for CagA phenotyping. Clin
Vaccine Immunol. 2009;16:1687–1692.
16. Rugge M, Genta RM. Staging and grading of chronic gastritis.
Hum Pathol. 2005;36:228–233.
17. Wong BC, Ching CK, Lam SK, et al. Differential north to south
gastric cancer-duodenal ulcer gradient in China. China ulcer
study group. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;13:1050–1057.
18. Yeomans ND, Naesdal J. Systematic review: ulcer definition in
NSAID ulcer prevention trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008;
27:465–472.
19. Kimura K, Takemoto T. Endoscopic atrophy border. Endoscopy..
1969;1:1–3.
20. Correa P, Haenszel W, Cuello C, Tannenbaum S, Archer M. A
model for gastric cancer epidemiology. Lancet. 1975;2:58–60.
21. Whiting JL, Sigurdsson A, Rowlands DC, Hallissey MT, Fielding
JW. The long term results of endoscopic surveillance of prema-
lignant gastric lesions. Gut. 2002;50:378–381.
22. Matsuhisa T, Matsukura N, Yamada N. Topography of chronic
active gastritis in helicobacter pylori-positive Asian populations:
age-, gender-, and endoscopic diagnosis-matched study. J Gas-
troenterol. 2004;39:324–328.
23. Yamaoka Y. Pathogenesis of helicobacter pylori-related gastro-
duodenal diseases from molecular epidemiological studies. Gas-
troenterol Res Pract.. 2012;2012:371503.
24. Yamaoka Y, Orito E, Mizokami M, et al. Helicobacter pylori in
north and South America before columbus. FEBS Lett. 2002;517:
180–184.
25. Yamaoka Y. Mechanisms of disease: Helicobacter pylori viru-
lence factors. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol.. 2010;7:629–641.
26. Azuma T. Helicobacter pylori CagA protein variation associated
with gastric cancer in Asia. J Gastroenterol. 2004;39:97–103.
27. Satoh K. Does eradication of helicobacter pylori reverse atrophic
gastritis or intestinal metaplasia? Data from japan. Gastroenterol
Clin North Am. 2000;29:829–835.
28. Li GQ, Xia HH, Chen MH, et al. Effects of aspirin on the
development of helicobacter pylori-induced gastric inflammation
and heterotopic proliferative glands in mongolian gerbils. Heli-
cobacter.. 2008;13:20–29.
29. Barkin J. The relation between helicobacter pylori and non-
steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Am J Med. 1998;105:
22S–27S.
30. Kuipers EJ, Lundell L, Klinkenberg-Knol EC, et al. Atrophic
gastritis and helicobacter pylori infection in patients with reflux
esophagitis treated with omeprazole or fundoplication. N Engl J
Med. 1996;334:1018–1022.
Dig Dis Sci (2014) 59:631–637 637
123