+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Differentiated Monitoring and Support · 9/24/2019  · Presenter Contact Information Ramonda...

Differentiated Monitoring and Support · 9/24/2019  · Presenter Contact Information Ramonda...

Date post: 24-Sep-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 0 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
34
Differentiated Monitoring and Support Division of Review and Support September 24, 2019
Transcript
  • Differentiated Monitoring and Support

    Division of Review and SupportSeptember 24, 2019

  • Presenter Contact Information

    Ramonda OlaloyeReview and Support ManagerTexas Education [email protected]

    Jacob KlettReview and Support ManagerTexas Education [email protected]

    https://tea.texas.gov/Academics/Special_Student_Populations/Review_and_Support/Review_and_Support

    https://tea.texas.gov/Academics/Special_Student_Populations/Review_and_Support/Review_and_Support/mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • Today’s Outcomes

    Participants will be able to explain the required and supplemental elements of the Differentiated Monitoring and Support (DMS) process for special education monitoring in the State of Texas.

    Participants will be able to describe the special education monitoring activities LEAs may experience during Targeted Support Reviews and Cyclical Reviews.

    Participants will be able to articulate the purpose of the Ascend Texas application and complete the steps needed to access the Ascend Texas platform.

  • Differentiated Monitoring and Support

  • Diagnostic Framework

    Three IDEA implementation

    domains

    Seven focus areas of

    compliance

  • Differentiated Monitoring and Support (DMS)

  • DMS Required Elements

  • DMS Supplemental Elements

  • Differentiated Supports

    Cyclical ReviewResults Driven Accountability

    Formerly Performance-Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS)Performance Levels and Determinations

    0-1 2 3 4

    Meets Requirements Needs Assistance

    Needs Intervention

    Needs Substantial

    Intervention

    Targeted Support ReviewResults Driven Accountability

    Formerly Performance-Based Monitoring Analysis System (PBMAS)Performance Levels and Determinations

    0-1 2 3 4

    Meets Requirements Needs Assistance

    Needs Intervention

    Needs Substantial

    Intervention

    Differentiated Support Performance LevelsUniversal Meets Requirement (0-1)

    Targeted Needs Assistance (2)

    Intensive Needs Intervention (3); Needs Substantial Intervention (4)

  • Self-Assessment

  • Purpose of the Self-Assessment

    Assist Local Education Agency (LEA) leadership teams in evaluating and improving its special education program.

    Engage leadership teams through a proactive approach by addressing special education compliance and improving

    student performance.

    Support continuous improvement activities with a focus on improving outcomes for students with disabilities.

  • Self-Assessment in 2019-2020

    Cyclical Groups 1 & 2

    • Test Groups to provide feedback• 3-4 Months for completion

    Cyclical Group 3

    • Full release of Self-Assessment• Spring 2020• LEAs notified prior to monitoring

  • Targeted Support Review

  • Targeted Support Review

  • Targeted Desk Review

    • Performance Level of 3 or 4• Focuses on select RDA/PBMAS indicators• Review of special education documentation• Documentation specific to RDA/PBMAS

    indicators• Provide information and/or clarification• Identify areas of strength in practice• Identify areas for improvement• Develop plan for support and Technical

    Assistance• Identify non-compliance and corrective

    actions if needed

  • Cyclical Review

  • Cyclical Reviews

    • One of two monitoring pathways in DMS

    • Encompasses all LEAs in Texas• One cycle every six years• Comprehensive special education

    program review• Not determined by Performance Level

    (RDA/PBMAS)• RDA/PBMAS determinations

    considered during review

  • Cyclical Reviews: Required Elements

    • TEA reviews LEA’s special education policies• LEA completes a Self-Assessment in Ascend• LEA uploads required special education

    documents in Ascend Texas• TEA completes Comprehensive Desk Review• Clarification conversations occur as needed• TEA issues report to LEA• 10 day window for additional clarification• Report of Findings provided to LEA

  • Comprehensive Desk Review

    • Focuses on all compliance areas within the Diagnostic Framework

    • IDEA and state special education compliance • Identify areas of strength in practice• Identify areas for improvement• Opportunities for clarification• Develop plan for support and Technical

    Assistance• Identify non-compliance and corrective

    actions if needed• Report of findings provided upon conclusion

  • Comprehensive Desk Review UploadsSpecial Education

    Population

    Desk Review Sample

    DR Initial Evaluation

    DR TransitionDR

    Grade/ Disability

    1-9 Census Census Census Census10-11 9 2 2 5

    12 10 3 2 513-14 11 3 2 615-16 12 3 3 617-18 13 3 3 719-20 14 4 3 721-23 15 4 3 824-25 16 4 4 826-28 17 4 4 929-31 18 5 4 932-34 19 5 4 1035-38 20 5 5 1039-42 21 5 5 1143-46 22 6 5 1147-51 23 6 5 1252-56 24 6 6 1257-62 25 6 6 1363-69 26 7 6 1370-77 27 7 6 1478-86 28 7 7 1487-96 29 7 7 1597-109 30 8 7 15

    110-124 31 8 7 16125-142 32 8 8 16143-165 33 8 8 17166-215 34 9 8 17216-234 35 9 8 18235-290 36 9 9 18291-373 37 9 9 19374-513 38 10 9 19514-795 39 10 9 20796-1665 40 10 10 20≥1666 41 10 10 21

    Sheet1

    Special Education PopulationDesk Review SampleDR Initial EvaluationDR TransitionDR Grade/ Disability

    1-9CensusCensusCensusCensus

    10-119225

    1210325

    13-1411326

    15-1612336

    17-1813337

    19-2014437

    21-2315438

    24-2516448

    26-2817449

    29-3118549

    32-34195410

    35-38205510

    39-42215511

    43-46226511

    47-51236512

    52-56246612

    57-62256613

    63-69267613

    70-77277614

    78-86287714

    87-96297715

    97-109308715

    110-124318716

    125-142328816

    143-165338817

    166-215349817

    216-234359818

    235-290369918

    291-373379919

    374-5133810919

    514-7953910920

    796-166540101020

    ≥166641101021

  • Example 1: Determining Required Uploads

    10 students who require special

    education services enrolled in LEA

    Special Education Population

    Desk Review Sample

    DR Initial Evaluation

    DR TransitionDR

    Grade/ Disability

    1-9 Census Census Census Census10-11 9 2 2 5

    12 10 3 2 513-14 11 3 2 615-16 12 3 3 617-18 13 3 3 719-20 14 4 3 721-23 15 4 3 824-25 16 4 4 826-28 17 4 4 929-31 18 5 4 932-34 19 5 4 1035-38 20 5 5 1039-42 21 5 5 1143-46 22 6 5 1147-51 23 6 5 12

    Sheet1

    Special Education PopulationDesk Review SampleDR Initial EvaluationDR TransitionDR Grade/ Disability

    1-9CensusCensusCensusCensus

    10-119225

    1210325

    13-1411326

    15-1612336

    17-1813337

    19-2014437

    21-2315438

    24-2516448

    26-2817449

    29-3118549

    32-34195410

    35-38205510

    39-42215511

    43-46226511

    47-51236512

    52-56246612

    57-62256613

    63-69267613

    70-77277614

    78-86287714

    87-96297715

    97-109308715

    110-124318716

    125-142328816

    143-165338817

    166-215349817

    216-234359818

    235-290369918

    291-373379919

    374-5133810919

    514-7953910920

    796-166540101020

    ≥166641101021

  • Example 2: Determining Required Uploads

    Special Education Population

    Desk Review Sample

    DR Initial Evaluation

    DR TransitionDR

    Grade/ Disability

    1-9 Census Census Census Census10-11 9 2 2 5

    12 10 3 2 513-14 11 3 2 615-16 12 3 3 617-18 13 3 3 719-20 14 4 3 721-23 15 4 3 824-25 16 4 4 826-28 17 4 4 929-31 18 5 4 932-34 19 5 4 1035-38 20 5 5 1039-42 21 5 5 1143-46 22 6 5 1147-51 23 6 5 12

    45 students who require special

    education services enrolled in LEA

    Sheet1

    Special Education PopulationDesk Review SampleDR Initial EvaluationDR TransitionDR Grade/ Disability

    1-9CensusCensusCensusCensus

    10-119225

    1210325

    13-1411326

    15-1612336

    17-1813337

    19-2014437

    21-2315438

    24-2516448

    26-2817449

    29-3118549

    32-34195410

    35-38205510

    39-42215511

    43-46226511

    47-51236512

    52-56246612

    57-62256613

    63-69267613

    70-77277614

    78-86287714

    87-96297715

    97-109308715

    110-124318716

    125-142328816

    143-165338817

    166-215349817

    216-234359818

    235-290369918

    291-373379919

    374-5133810919

    514-7953910920

    796-166540101020

    ≥166641101021

  • Example 3: Determining Required Uploads

    1,034 students who require special

    education services enrolled in LEA

    Special Education Population

    Desk Review Sample

    DR Initial Evaluation

    DR TransitionDR

    Grade/ Disability

    63-69 26 7 6 1370-77 27 7 6 1478-86 28 7 7 1487-96 29 7 7 1597-109 30 8 7 15

    110-124 31 8 7 16125-142 32 8 8 16143-165 33 8 8 17166-215 34 9 8 17216-234 35 9 8 18235-290 36 9 9 18291-373 37 9 9 19374-513 38 10 9 19514-795 39 10 9 20796-1665 40 10 10 20≥1666 41 10 10 21

    Sheet1

    Special Education PopulationDesk Review SampleDR Initial EvaluationDR TransitionDR Grade/ Disability

    1-9CensusCensusCensusCensus

    10-119225

    1210325

    13-1411326

    15-1612336

    17-1813337

    19-2014437

    21-2315438

    24-2516448

    26-2817449

    29-3118549

    32-34195410

    35-38205510

    39-42215511

    43-46226511

    47-51236512

    52-56246612

    57-62256613

    63-69267613

    70-77277614

    78-86287714

    87-96297715

    97-109308715

    110-124318716

    125-142328816

    143-165338817

    166-215349817

    216-234359818

    235-290369918

    291-373379919

    374-5133810919

    514-7953910920

    796-166540101020

    ≥166641101021

  • Cyclical Review: On-Site Reviews

    • Not all cyclical reviews include on-site• 2019-2020 on-site reviews determined using

    prior academic year’s data• On-site reviews completed in three to

    four days• Case study approach• Focus on IEP implementation• Purpose is to gather additional data• Includes entrance and exit conference• Stakeholder interviews• Student observations

  • Cyclical Review: On-Site Reviews

    • Cyclical review notifications to LEAs in July 2019• Notifications specific to each LEA• Required activities outlined • Notification letter indicates if On-Site Review required

  • Ascend Texas Platform

  • Ascend Texas in TEAL

  • Ascend Texas in TEAL

  • Ascend Texas in TEAL

  • Ascend Texas in TEAL

  • Ascend Texas Roles in TEAL

    Ascend Role in TEAL Who Should Request

    LEA Approver Superintendent or designee

    LEA Data Entry LEA determined

    TEA Full Edit TEA only

    TEA Viewer TEA only

    Viewer ESC staff

  • Additional Supports

  • Thank you!

    Slide Number 1Presenter Contact InformationToday’s OutcomesDifferentiated Monitoring and SupportDiagnostic FrameworkDifferentiated Monitoring and Support (DMS)DMS Required ElementsDMS Supplemental ElementsDifferentiated SupportsSelf-AssessmentPurpose of the Self-AssessmentSelf-Assessment in 2019-2020Targeted Support ReviewTargeted Support ReviewTargeted Desk ReviewCyclical ReviewCyclical ReviewsSlide Number 18Comprehensive Desk ReviewComprehensive Desk Review UploadsExample 1: Determining Required UploadsExample 2: Determining Required UploadsExample 3: Determining Required UploadsCyclical Review: On-Site ReviewsCyclical Review: On-Site ReviewsAscend Texas PlatformSlide Number 27Ascend Texas in TEALAscend Texas in TEALAscend Texas in TEALAscend Texas in TEALAscend Texas Roles in TEALAdditional SupportsThank you!


Recommended