+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski [email protected].

Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski [email protected].

Date post: 25-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: erika-lindsey
View: 226 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
44
Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski [email protected]
Transcript
Page 1: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Differentiated Supervision

Cheryl [email protected]

Page 3: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Project Goal

• To develop educator effectiveness models that will reform the way we evaluate school professionals as well as the critical components of training and professional growth.

3

The term “educator” includes teachers, education specialists, and principals.

Page 5: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.
Page 6: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

6

Page 7: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Observation/ Practice 80%

Student Per-formance 20%

Observation and PracticeDanielson Framework Domains1. Planning and Preparation2. Educational Environment3. Delivery of Service 4. Professional Development

Student Performance/Multiple Measures(SPP)

Non Teaching Professional Employee Effectiveness System in Act 82 of 2012

Effective 2014-2015 SY

7

Page 8: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

A Framework for Teaching:Components of Professional Practice

Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities

•Reflecting on Teaching•Maintaining Accurate Records•Communicating with Families•Contributing to the School and District•Growing and Developing Professionally•Showing Professionalism

Domain 3: Instruction

•Communicating Clearly and Accurately

•Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques•Engaging Students in Learning•Using Assessment in Instruction•Demonstrating Flexibility and

Responsiveness

Domain 1: Planning and Preparation

•Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy

•Demonstrating Knowledge of Students•Selecting Instruction Goals•Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources•Designing Coherent Instruction•Assessing Student Learning

Domain 2: The Classroom Environment

•Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport

•Establishing a Culture for Learning•Managing Classroom Procedures•Managing Student Behavior•Organizing Physical Space

8

Page 9: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.
Page 10: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Non-Teaching Professionals Defined:Educational Specialists

• Educational Specialists are defined in Pennsylvania School Code with the scope of their certificates and assignments described in Certification and Staffing Polices and Guidelines (CSPGs).

• Currently CSPG 75 through 81 list the following specialist certifications:

Behavior Specialist Certified School Nurse Dental Hygienist Home School Visitor Instructional Technology Specialist Occupational and Physical Therapist School Counselor School Psychologist School Social Worker 10

Page 11: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Non-Teaching Professionals Defined:

Licensed Professionals• Given that many LEAs hire licensed professionals under teacher

contracts who are not certificated as specialists under Pennsylvania School Code, PDE has made a decision to develop revised Danielson Framework for Teaching rubrics for the following roles:

Occupational Therapist

Physical Therapist

Social Workers

Behavior Specialists

PDE does not have the authority to promulgate evaluation systems for individuals who do not hold PA instructional, specialist, or administrative certifications. PDE has worked with stakeholders to develop modified instruments for licensed professionals who typically are hired by LEAs under teacher contracts. However, it will be a local decision whether such instruments are used.

11

Page 12: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Teaching Professional Employees with Unique Roles and Functions

• Gifted Teachers • Special Education Teachers • ESL Teachers • Reading Specialists • Early Childhood and Early Intervention

Teachers • Career Technology Education Teachers • Speech Language Pathologists

• School Librarians http://pdesas.org/Instruction/Frameworks

Page 13: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.
Page 14: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.
Page 15: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.
Page 16: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Unique Roles: Two-Prong Question on Instruction• To determine whether you are a teaching

professional, you must be able to answer yes to the following two questions:

• 1) Are you working under your instructional certification?

• 2) Do you provide direct instruction* to students in a particular subject or grade level?

• *Direct instruction is defined as planning and providing the instruction, and assessing the effectiveness of the instruction.

Page 17: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Which Rubric? 82-1 or -2?Educational Professional

Teaching ProfessionalAre they working

under their instruction

al certificatio

n?

Are they providing

direct instruction to students

in a particular subject or

grade level?

If yes to both, use Teacher

Rubics and 82-1

If no to one, consider them Non-Teaching

Non-Teaching Professional

Non-Teaching Rubrics,

Evaluate using 82-2

Two-Pronged Question

Page 18: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Non-Teaching Professionals

• Under Act 82, if you are working under your instructional certification but do not provide direct instruction to students you are considered a non-teaching professional. Act 82 applies to non-teaching professionals in 2014-2015. PDE will publish a rating tool for Non-Teaching Professionals in the Pennsylvania Bulletin by June 30, 2014.

Page 19: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

1) Will Non-Teaching Professionals/Specialists/Licensed professionals utilize the same observation process as the Danielson Framework for Teaching for teachers?

Pre-conference (evidence collection)

Observation (evidence collection)

Post-conference (evidence collection)

YES!

2) Who should evaluate specialists and licensed professionals?

This is a local decision, typically, Principals, IU Supervisors, Directors of Pupil Personnel, Directors of Special Education evaluate non-teaching professional

employees.

Page 20: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

The Framework for Teaching

21The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson

Domain 1: Planning and Preparation a. Demonstrating Knowledge of Content and Pedagogy b. Demonstrating Knowledge of Students c. Setting Instructional Outcomes d. Demonstrating Knowledge of Resources e. Designing Coherent Instruction f. Designing Student Assessments

Domain 2: The Classroom Environment a. Creating an Environment of Respect and Rapport b. Establishing a Culture for Learning c. Managing Classroom Procedures d. Managing Student Behavior e. Organizing Physical Space

Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities a. Reflecting on Teaching b. Maintaining Accurate Records c. Communicating with Families d. Participating in a Professional Community e. Growing and Developing Professionally f. Showing Professionalism

Domain 3: Instruction a. Communicating With Students b. Using Questioning and Discussion Techniques c. Engaging Students in Learning d. Using Assessment in Instruction e. Demonstrating Flexibility and Responsiveness

Page 21: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Activity ~ • At your tables, brainstorm what you do

as a school librarian at the building/district level and write each activity on a post-it.

• http://tinyurl.com/mcm8xv3

Click close on the pop up!

• Discuss with a partner where these activates fall on the framework.

• What do you notice about the list?

Page 23: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

An approach to teacher learning that offers options for the type of supervision/professional development that they receive depending on their needs, experience, knowledge, and skill level as aligned with the Educator Effectiveness Model.

What is Differentiated Supervision?

Page 24: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Differentiated Supervision

• PDE recommends that professional employees who received a “Satisfactory” summative rating in the previous two years should be eligible to participate in Differentiated Supervision.

• All Differentiated Supervision Modes must be aligned to the Danielson Framework for Teaching

• While not collecting evidence through the clinical supervision process, evaluators should use walk-throughs and other strategies to keep informed of the teacher’s overall performance throughout the year.

Page 25: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

ADVANTAGES Differentiated Supervision

• Gives teachers ownership of goal setting as they reflect on the Danielson rubric to assess their practice

• Matches teachers’ skill level and experience with their professional development

• Motivates teachers as professionals to stretch beyond their current level of performance (e.g., proficient to distinguished) in a non-threatening environment

Page 26: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

ADVANTAGES for Schools• Builds bridges across classrooms, reducing teacher

isolation and fostering a more collaborative workplace (4d)

• Capitalizes on sharing the talent and expertise of a diverse faculty through opportunities for job-embedded learning

• Makes better use of administrator time, especially with the intensity of the new teacher evaluation model!

• Enhances student learning by stimulating teacher learning (nurtures and nudges)

Page 27: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Differentiated Supervision

Process

• Self-Assessment

• Action Planning

• Evidence Collection

• Documentation

Modules

• Action Research (Self Directed)

• Colleague Observation

• Professional Portfolio

Question for Discussion: What are some of the unique circumstances and/or challenges in supporting librarians through the differentiated supervision process?

Page 28: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

PDE and Differentiated Supervision

• Differentiated Supervision remains a local option under local control. It is not part of Act 82.

Page 29: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Self-Directed Model/Action Research

• Self-Directed Model/Action Research Mode - professional employees will develop a structured, on-going reflection of a practice-related issue (Danielson Framework for Teaching or a PDE-approved alternative system). Professionals may work individually or in small groups, dyads or triads, to complete the action research project. Meeting notes, resources, data collection tools, and the results of the reflective sessions should be shared with the principal and used as evidence in the supervision and evaluation of the employee.

• A solution-oriented process that engages teachers in formally asking and answering questions about their practice.

Page 30: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Peer Coaching Model• Professional employees work in dyads or triads to discuss and observe their own or another professional employee's pedagogy, student learning, curriculum aligned to the Pennsylvania Core Standards and other pertinent issues in a collaborative manner. The professionals will work together to define their professional needs and develop plans to assist them in the successful completion of the identified tasks including: specific target area(s), the evidence to be collected, observation dates, and a reflective session. Meeting notes, data collection tools, results of the observations, and the reflective sessions should be shared with the principal and used as evidence in the supervision and evaluation of the employee.

Page 31: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Portfolio• Portfolio Mode - professional employees will examine their own practice in relation to the Danielson Framework for Teaching or a PDE-approved alternative system and reflect in a written report and/or documented discussions with colleagues. Portfolios may be developed according to criteria established collaboratively by the administrator and the teacher based upon their interests or needs. Resources, data collection tools, and the results of the reflective sessions should be shared with the principal and used as evidence in the supervision and evaluation of the employee.

Page 32: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

• Many teachers experience difficulty when asked to set specific, meaningful, challenging, and measurable goals

• Goals should be data-driven

• Individual teacher goals should connect to the district’s, building, or grade level initiatives, as well as to the teaching standards used as part of the Educator Effectiveness model

Page 33: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Self Directed VS. Action Research

HOW DO I UNDERSTAND AND PROVIDE IT?

• Domain III

• GOAL:

To conduct an in depth study of differentiated instruction and subsequently revise my lesson plans to incorporate

HOW DO I ASSESS THE IMPACT OF DI ON MY STUDENTS’ LEARNING?

• Domain III

• GOAL:What impact do my differentiated instruction lessons and assessments have on my students’ learning at all levels (above, at, and below grade level)?

Page 34: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

BENEFITS OF ACTION RESEARCH

• Creates a mindset of teaching as professional problem-solving as teachers identify questions and seek solutions

• Fosters reflection, self-assessment, and teacher decision-making

• Recognizes the powerful role that teacher inquiry can play in bringing about increased collaboration, change, and continuous improvement

Page 35: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

PEER COACHING

• Dancers have mirrors to provide them with specific feedback.

• As educators, where are our mirrors?

• How can we make use of another set of eyes in our classrooms?

Doesn’t Michael Phelps have a coach

Page 36: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

WHAT IS PEER COACHING?

• A confidential and voluntary process when competent professionals, who are adequately trained to do so, observe, collect data, and collaboratively conference with one another

• They share their expertise and experience, and they provide each other with feedback, support, and an opportunity for ongoing reflection into their pedagogy, student learning, or curriculum as aligned to the Common Core Standards

Page 37: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

WHY DO WE NEED TEACHER TRAINING?

• Teachers must understand the difference between observation and judgment

• Teachers must learn some basic data collection techniques to match the domain/standard (e.g., questioning techniques)

• Teachers must understand what to do with that data: how to interpret it

• Teachers must subsequently use that data to set goals and inform future teacher decision making regarding students’ learning

Page 38: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

TEACHING: EVIDENCE OR OPINION

Factual reporting: artifacts, teacher actions, student behaviors

• YOUR TURN. Let’s look at some authentic recorded data from teacher observations. What do you notice about each of these statements and how might that impact the peer coaching process?

Page 39: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

EXAMPLES: EVIDENCE VS. OPINION?• Thirty percent of the students responded orally at least once during the discussion.

• There was too much noise during seatwork.

• Students were confused as to the directions for the activity.

• Karen left her seat six times during the mini lesson.

Evidence

Opinion

Opinion

Evidence

Page 40: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Evidence or Opinion?

1. The teacher has a warm relationship with the students.

2. The teacher said that the South should have won the Civil War.

3. The table groups were arranged in 2 x 2 pods.

4. The materials and supplies were organized well.

5. Wait time was insufficient for student thinking.

6. The teacher stated that students have learned to add 2-digit numbers in preparation for today’s lesson.

7. 6 students, questioned randomly, did not know the day’s learning goals.

Page 41: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

GROWTH PORTFOLIOS

• A collection of artifacts surrounding a specific standard serve as a tangible body of evidence to demonstrate growth toward the goal (Live Binder a good technological option)

• Assembling artifacts is a powerful vehicle for personal reflection and self-assessment

• Sharing the portfolio with an administrator fosters professional dialogue & celebrates achievement and progression over time

Page 42: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

HOW DOES A REFLECTIVE PORTFOLIO TRULY DEMONSTRATE GROWTH OVER TIME?

• Just as in other DS modes, evidence begins with the goal statement.

• The action plan lists concrete steps the teacher will take to progress toward the goal.

• The artifacts should clearly reflect a “before” and “after” portrait of what the teacher has accomplished.

• Reflective statements to accompany the artifacts are a must, giving meaning and salience to what is included.

Page 43: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Questions…

Page 44: Differentiated Supervision Cheryl Giles-Rudawski cgiles@caiu.org.

Contact Information

Cheryl Giles-Rudawski

[email protected]

(717) 732-8400 x 8639


Recommended