+ All Categories
Home > Documents > DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

Date post: 03-Feb-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
32
DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?) BILL LUTHER FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C.
Transcript
Page 1: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

DIGITALRADIOCOMMUNICATION(WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

BILL LUTHERFEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Page 2: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

TOPICS FOR DISCUSSION• POLICY OBJECTIVES• ITU MULTIMEDIA STUDIES• ADVANCED WIRELESS SYSTEMS• DIGITAL RADIO BROADCAST• DIGITAL TELEVISION BROADCAST• 12 GHz TERRESTRIAL SHARING WITH

GSO SATELLITE DBS• BROADBAND SATELLITE• ABOVE 50 GHz• FUTURE (SOFTWARE) RADIOS• ULTRA-WIDEBAND SYSTEMS

Page 3: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

POLICY OBJECTIVES• FOSTER COMPETITIVE AND

INNOVATIVE COMMUNICATIONSINDUSTRIES

• MINIMIZE REGULATION AND ENACTFLEXIBLE REGULATORY POLICIES

• PROMOTE MARKET ACCESS ANDENCOURAGE GOVERNMENTS TO ADOPTOPEN, NON-DISCRIMINATORY,TRANSPARENT POLICIES

Page 4: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

ITU-R JOINT TASK GROUP 1-6-8-9TERRESTRIAL WIRELESS

INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA• WRC-2003 AGENDA ITEM 1.21

– TO CONSIDER STUDIES CONCERNINGTECHNICAL AND REGULATORYREQUIREMENTS OF TERRESTRIALWIRELESS INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIAAPPLICATIONS, IN ACCORDANCE WITHRESOLUTION 737 (WRC-2000), WITH A VIEWTO FACILITATING GLOBALHARMONIZATION

Page 5: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

RESOLUTION 737 (WRC-2000)

1. FACILITATE DEVELOPMENT OF COMMON,WORLDWIDE ALLOCATIONS ORIDENTIFICATION OF SPECTRUM

2. REVIEW REGULATORY METHODS AND MEANSOF WORLDWIDE SPECTRUM IDENTIFICATIONTO FACILITATE HARMONIZATION OFEMERGING TERRESTRIAL WIRELESSINTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMS FORUNIVERSAL PERSONAL SERVICES

3. REVIEW, IF NECESSARY, SERVICEDEFINITIONS IN LIGHT OF CONVERGENCE

4. REPORT TO A FUTURE CONFERENCE

Page 6: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

TERRESTRIAL WIRELESSINTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA

M o b ile F ix e d

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

�����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������

H D F S

L M D S

N W A / R L A N F W A

B r o a d c a s t in g

I n t e r a c t iv e B r o a d c a s t in g

M W A / C e llu la r B W A

LMDS: Local multipoint distribution system RLAN: Radio local area networkFWA: Fixed wireless access NWA: Nomadic wireless accessBWA: Broadband fixed wireless access MWA: Mobile wireless accessHDFS: High density applications in the fixed service

Page 7: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT(ITU-R SG 1) STUDIES

• HOW ARE INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIAAPPLICATIONS OF TERRESTRIAL FIXED, MOBILE,AND BROADCASTING SERVICES CONVERGINGTECHNICALLY?

• HOW DOES TECHNICAL CONVERGENCE IMPACTON THE NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL RADIOREGULATORY ENVIRONMENT?

• IF TECHNICAL CONVERGENCE IMPACTS THESERVICE DEFINITIONS OF THE RADIOREGULATIONS, HOW SHOULD THE DEFINITIONS BEREVISED?

Page 8: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

SPECTRUM MANAGEMENT(ITU-R SG 1) QUESTIONS

• WHAT CHARACTERISTICS DOES A TERRESTRIALWIRELESS INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA SYSTEMHAVE?

• WHAT ARE THE APPLICATIONS ANDTECHNOLOGIES THAT FALL INTO THISCATEGORY?

• HOW DO THESE APPLICATIONS ANDTECHNOLOGIES RELATE TO THE SPECTRUM?

• WHAT ARE THE SHARING SCENARIOS?• WHAT ARE REGULATORY IMPEDIMENTS?• WHAT ARE TRENDS (CURRENT AND FORESEEN)

THAT WILL IMPACT THE RESPONSES TO THESEQUESTIONS?

Page 9: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

BROADCAST (ITU-R SG 6)STUDIES

STUDY GROUP 6 STUDIES TERRESTRIAL ANDSATELLITE BROADCASTING FROM END-TO-END, INCLUDING VISION, SOUND,MULTIMEDIA AND DATA SERVICESINTENDED FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC. USEIS MADE OF POINT-TO-EVERYWHEREINFORMATION DELIVERY. WHEN RETURNCHANNELS ARE REQUIRED FOR ACCESSCONTROL, INTERACTIVITY, ETC., ANASYMMETRICAL INFRASTRUCTURE ISUSED.

Page 10: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

MOBILE SERVICE STUDIESITU-R WORKING PARTY 8F

(IMT-2000 AND BEYOND)• FUTURE SYSTEMS WITH DATA RATES > 2 Mbit/s• INCLUDE FREQUENCY BANDS ABOVE 3 GHz• SERVICE APPLICATIONS, OBJECTIVES AND USER

NEEDS• INCLUDE ENHANCED INTERNET PROTOCOL• TECHNICAL AND OPERATIONAL ISSUES, AND

CHARACTERISTICS• HARMONIZE SPECTRUM• MIGRATION STRATEGY• GLOBAL CIRCULATION AND MUTUAL

RECOGNITION AGREEMENTS

Page 11: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

ADVANCED WIRELESSSERVICES BELOW 3 GHz

• STUDIES HAVE JUST BEGUN OF TYPES OFADVANCED, FUTURE MOBILE AND FIXEDCOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES, INCLUDING 3G

• STUDIES– TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS– SPECTRUM REQUIREMENTS

• AMOUNT OF SPECTRUM• FREQUENCY BANDS

• STUDIES INCLUDE OF BANDS CURRENTLY USEDFOR ANALOG CELLULAR, PERSONALCOMMUNICATIONS SERVICE, SPECIALIZEDMOBILE RADIO AND THE FIVE BANDS JUSTALLOCATED BY WRC-2000 (ISTANBUL)

Page 12: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

THIRD GENERATION(IMT-2000 AND BEYOND)

1710 - 1755 MHz - FIXED & MOBILE1755 - 1850 MHz - DEFENSE USES2110 - 2150 MHz - FIXED & MOBILE2160 - 2165 MHz - FIXED & MOBILE2500 - 2690 MHz - MMDS and ITFS

Page 13: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

DIGITAL FM BROADCAST• 88 - 108 MHz BAND• EXISTING FM RADIO STATIONS IN THE U.S. ARE

USING +/- 75 kHz DEVIATION AT 200 kHzCHANNEL SEPARATION

• OTHER COUNTRIES, E.G., IN EUROPE, AREUSING +/- 50 kHz DEVIATION AT 100 kHzCHANNEL SEPARATION

• IN-BAND ON CHANNEL (IBOC) DIGITALOVERLAY EXPERIMENTS

• IBOC DIGITAL SIGNAL INSERTED ~25 dBBELOW THE ANALOG FM SIGNAL

• OTHER STANDARDS BEING DISCUSSEDINTERNATIONALLY WITH THE HOPE OFFINDING A COMMON GLOBAL STANDARD

Page 14: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

DIGITAL SOUND BROADCASTINGBELOW 30 MHz

THE WORLD BROADCASTING UNION AND THE ITU HAVEBEEN COOPERATING IN SUPPORT OF STUDIES LEADINGTO THE ADOPTION OF SINGLE WORLDWIDEBROADCASTING STANDARDS, PARTICULARLY:• SINGLE COMMON DIGITAL SOUND BROADCAST

SYSTEM IN LF, MF, AND HF• DIGITAL CODING AND MODULATION COMPATIBLE

WITH EXISTING STATION PLANNING• WHAT ARE ADVANTAGES OVER ANALOG• WHAT ARE NEW SERVICES• COMPLEXITY OF DUAL STANDARD (ANALOG AND

DIGITAL) BROADCAST RECEIVERS

Page 15: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

SATELLITE RADIO SYSTEMSU.S. Services International

Sirius XM satellite radio Worldspace

Market auto auto/home home/portableOrbit inclined GEO GEOSize 3 satellites 2 satellites 3 satellitesManuf. Loral Hughes AlcatelChannels 100 100 NAOEM Ford GM NA

Page 16: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

DIGITAL TELEVISION

• THERE ARE TWO COMMON GLOBALSTANDARD (ANALOG) TELEVISIONBROADCAST CHANNEL BANDWIDTHS, 6 MHzAND 8 MHz

• THERE IS A COMMON DIGITAL TELEVISIONDISPLAY FORMAT BUT DIFFERENT RFMODULATION SCHEMES, COFDM AND 8VSB

• VERY POLITICAL• RECALL THE DIGITAL LAG IN TRANSITION

FROM ANALOG TO DIGITAL (HIGH DEFINITIONDEFINED AS EQUIVALENT TO A 35 mm CINEMAPICTURE

Page 17: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

INTERACTIVE TELEVISION

• THE FCC BEGAN (JANUARY 2001)THE STUDY OF THE DEFINITION OFINTERACTIVE TELEVISIONSERVICES SO AS TO FACILITATEAPPROPRIATE LICENSING:– VIDEO PIPELINE (MPEG VIDEO)?– HIGH SPEED INTERNET PROTOCOL?– CUSTOMER PREMISES EQUIPMENT?– ANTI-COMPETITIVE BEHAVIOR?

Page 18: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

BSS SHARING (NORTHPOINT)• SHARING WITH GEOSTATIONARY

SATELLITE, BROADCASTSATELLITE SERVICE (BSS), ISFEASIBLE

• UNIQUE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL• MANDATORY INTERFERENCE

TESTING REQUIRED (BY U.S.CONGRESS)

• POLITICALLY SENSITIVE

Page 19: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

Ka/Ku-BAND U.S.BROADBAND SATELLITE SYSTEMS

CAI SatcomGE StarPlusEchoStarGE StarHughes SpacewayiSkyAstrolinkLoral CyberstarMorning StarCyberStar

NetSat 28PanAmSatSkyBridge (LEO in Ku)Teledesic (LEO)VisionStarOrion KaVinasatCelstar*DirecTV Expansion

* Also plans to operate in C-band

Page 20: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

ADDITIONAL Ka/Ku-BANDBROADBAND SATELLITE SYSTEMS

Medsat (Aerospatiale)

Videosat (France Telecom)

WEST (Matra Marconi Space)

Genesis (Deutsche Telekom)

Euroskyway (Alenia Spazio)

Astra (Societe Europenne desSatellites)

Megasat (Mexico)

Gelikon (Informkosmos)

South Africa-sat (South Africa)

Diamondsat (South Africa)

PC DataStar* (PCG)

Afrisat (United Kingdom)

Page 21: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

V-BAND U.S.BROADBAND SATELLITE SYSTEMS

Globalstar (GS-40)Hughes ExpresswayHughes SpaceCastHughes StarLynxPanAmSat V-StreamVisionStar

Loral CyberPathMotorola M-StarOSC (OrbLink)PanAmSat (V-Stream)Spectrum AstroTeledesicTRW (GESN/GEO)

Page 22: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

BROADBAND CAPACITYQUESTION

• EXPECTED GROWTH IN SATELLITE ASDELIVERY MECHANISM FOR BROADBANDDATA COULD STRAIN SATELLITE CAPACITY

• 25 MILLION PEOPLE IN RURAL AREAS (U.S.ALONE) WILL NEED BROADBAND VIASATELLITE

• CURRENT ESTIMATE: 20,000 BROADBANDSUBSCRIBERS/TRANSPONDER OR 480,000BROADBAND CONSUMERS/SATELLITE (24TRANSPONDERS/SATELLITE)

Page 23: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

PROMOTING COMMERCIALMILLIMETER WAVE USE (ABOVE

50 GHz)• 51.4 - 52.6 GHz AND 58.2 - 59 GHz BANDS IN THE

U.S. ALLOCATED TO FIXED AND MOBILESERVICES (INTERCONNECT MOBILE SERVICEBASE STATIONS AND INTERCONNECTDIFFERENT SYSTEMS)

• 57 - 59 GHz ALLOCATED TO UNLICENSED USES(FCC PART 15) SO AS TO ENLARGE THECURRENLY UNLICENSED 59 - 64 GHz BAND TO 8GHz (VERY HIGH SPEED AND/OR HIGHBANDWIDTH COMMUNICATION OVER SHORTDISTANCES AND FOR NETWORKINGBACKBONE PURPOSES IN CONGESTED AREAS)

Page 24: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

PROMOTING COMMERCIALMILLIMETER WAVE USE (ABOVE

50 GHz)• 64 - 66 GHz ALLOCATED TO FIXED AND MOBILE

SERVICES, EXCEPT FOR AERONAUTICAL MOBILESERVICE (AGAIN, INTERCONNECT MOBILESERVICE BASE STATIONS AND INTERCONNECTDIFFERENT SYSTEMS)

• 65 - 71 GHz ALLOCATED TO INTERSATELLITESERVICE (ISS) TO MAKE SATELLITE NETWORKINTERCONNECTIONS MORE EFFICIENT (WILLPROMOTE VIDEO TELEPHONY, MEDICAL ANDTECHNICAL TELE-IMAGING, HIGH SPEED DATANETWORKS, AND BANDWIDTH-ON-DEMAND FORCONSUMERS)

Page 25: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

U.S. UNLICENSED OPERATION57 - 64 GHz

• LICENSING THIS BAND IS UNNECESSARY BECAUSEOF THE VERY LIMITED POTENTIAL FORINTERFERENCE DUE TO THE LOW POWER LIMITS,THE DRAMATIC OXYGEN ABSORPTION OF RFENERGY AT FREQUENCIES AROUND 60 GHz, ANDTHE NARROW BEAMWIDTH OF POINT-TO-POINTANTENNAS USED OUTSIDE

• MAXIMUM PFD PERMITTED IN THIS 7 GHz BAND IS9 uW/cm2 AVERAGE, AND 18 uW/cm2 PEAK AT 3METERS

• NOKIA HAS ALREADY BEGUN DEPLOYINGUNLICENSED MICRO-CELLULAR EQUIPMENT INTHE BAND 57 - 59 GHz IN EUROPE

Page 26: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

SOFTWARE DEFINED RADIO

• NEW TECHNOLOGY USING SOFTWARE (COMPUTERS), RATHERTHAN HARDWARE FOR TRANSMITTERS AND RECEIVERS TOCHANGE OPERATING PARAMETERS, INCLUDING FREQUENCY,MODULATION, AND POWER

• RADIOS QUICKLY CHANGE TRANSMIT FREQUENCIES ANDFORMAT

• DESIGNED TO ALLEVIATE POTENTIAL SPECTRUM SHORTAGEAND SPUR MORE EFFICIENT USE OF BANDWIDTH

• WILL ASSIST INTEROPERABILITY, PARTICULARLY FORPUBLIC SAFETY AND BETWEEN FEDERAL AND LOCALOFFICIALS

• ITU-R SG 8 STUDYING APPROPRIATE TECHNICALCHARACTERISTICS, FREQUENCY BANDS, INTERFERENCECONSIDERATIONS, OPERATIONAL ISSUES, AND DEFINITIONS

Page 27: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB)(UNLICENSED - NO COORDINATION)• EXTREMELY NARROW PULSE

MODULATION, SWEPT FM OVER A WIDEBANDWIDTH, OR FREQUENCY HOPPINGSYSTEM

• TWO OBSTACLES TO IMPLEMENTATION– WIDE BANDWIDTH EMISSIONS CAN RESULT IN

FUNDAMENTAL ENERGY IN RESTRICTED BANDS,E.G., TELEVISION, SAFETY, RADIONAVIGATION

– CURRENT PHILOSOPHY AND REGULATIONS AREGEARED TO NARROWBAND SYSTEMS AND MAYPOSE UNNECESSARY RESTRICTIONS TO UWBTECHNOLOGY

Page 28: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

ULTRA-WIDEBAND (UWB)

PROPOSED USES:– GROUND PENETRATING RADARS (PUBLIC SAFETY,

ARCHEOLOGICAL, CIVIL ENGINEERING, EARTHQUAKE)– THROUGH-THE-WALL RADAR FOR PUBLIC SAFETY AND

CONSTRUCTION– EMERGENCY MOTION AND IMAGING– HIGH PERFORMANCE MICROPHONES– LOCAL AREA NETWORKS– SECURITY DEVICES– COLLISION AVOIDANCE SENSORS– FLUID-LEVEL DETECTION– SHORT RANGE CLANDESTINE COMMUNICATION DEVICES– LONG RANGE MILITARY COMMUNICATIONS

Page 29: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

PROPOSED UWB DEFINITION• ANY EMITTING DEVICE WHERE THE FRACTIONAL

BANDWIDTH IS GREATER THAN 0.25 OR OCCUPIES1.5 GHz* OR MORE OF SPECTRUM

• THIS DEFINITION IS PROPOSED TO BE BASED ONTHE -10 dB BANDWIDTH, MEASURED AFTER THEANTENNA**, BECAUSE THESE DEVICES OPERATESO CLOSE TO THE NOISE FLOOR

• CENTER FREQUENCY IS THE AVERAGE OF THEUPPER AND LOWER -10 dB FREQUENCY POINTS

*The 1.5 GHz bandwidth floor would only apply where thecenter frequency is greater than 6 GHz.

**The antenna acts as a bandpass filter for UWB devices.

Page 30: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

UWB FRACTIONAL BANDWIDTH

FRACTIONAL BW = 2(Fh - Fl)/(Fh + Fl)

WHERE

Fh = HIGHEST FREQUENCY LIMIT WITH SIGNAL 10 dBBELOW PEAK EMISSION

Fl = LOWEST FREQUENCY LIMIT WITH SIGNAL 10 dBBELOW PEAK EMISSION

Page 31: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

UWB• STUDIES AND EXPERIMENTS ARE BEING CONDUCTED

AND REPORTED TO ENABLE INFORMED REGULATORYDECISIONS, PARTICULARLY WITH REGARD TOPOSSIBLE INTERFERENCE TO SATELLITERADIONAVIGATION AND RADIOLOCATION SYSTEMS,E.G., ILS, MLS, DME, SARSAT, ALTIMETERS, GPS ANDGLONASS

• PROPOSED PEAK EMISSION LIMIT OVER THE ENTIREBANDWIDTH, PENDING STUDIES AND EXPERIMENTS, IS:

[20 + 20LOG10(-10dB BANDWIDTH IN Hz/50 MHz)] dB

ADDITIONALLY, THIS PROPOSED PEAK IS NOT TO EXCEEDTHE AVERAGE BY MORE THAN 60 dB

Page 32: DIGITAL RADIOCOMMUNICATION (WHERE ARE WE GOING?)

FEDERALCOMMUNICATIONS

COMMISSION

http://www.fcc.gov

[email protected]


Recommended