+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science...

Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science...

Date post: 21-Dec-2015
Category:
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
25
Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of- the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What We Know and Need to Know Sharon M. Stern Poverty and Health Statistics Branch U.S. Census Bureau October 5, 2006
Transcript
Page 1: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

Disability Data in the American Community Survey

Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics:What We Know and Need to Know

Sharon M. SternPoverty and Health Statistics BranchU.S. Census Bureau

October 5, 2006

Page 2: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

2

Overview

• What is the American Community Survey (ACS)?

• ACS Operations • Current disability items• 2006 ACS Content Test

– How content for test was developed– Review of test operations– Selection criteria

• Update on SIPP and DEWS

Page 3: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

3

What is the American Community Survey (ACS)?

• The ACS is a nationwide survey designed to provide communities a fresh look at how they are changing.

• The ACS provides a statistical snapshot of the community

Page 4: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

4

How is ACS household data collected?

Surveys are mailed every month to a systematic sample of addresses in each county

If a household does not respond in six weeks, Census Bureau staff will attempt to contact the respondent by telephone to complete the survey.

If that, too, fails, a differential sample of remaining addresses will be visited by Census Bureau staff for an in person interview.

Page 5: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

5

Response Rates By Mode

Mail51%

Phone9%

Personal visit38%

Non-interviews

2%

http://www.brookings.edu/metro/umi/events/20060623_Waite.pdf

Page 6: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

6

Group Quarters in ACSImplemented in 2006

• Questionnaires, introductory letter, FAQ’s … http://www.census.gov/acs/www/SBasics/GQ/index.htm

• Technical Paper – housing units and group quarters… http://www.census.gov/acs/www/Downloads/tp67.pdf

Page 7: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

7

ACS – Paper Form – Disability Items

Bottom of page 7

Top of page 8

Page 8: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

8

ACS Interagency CommitteeSubcommittee for the Disability Questions

• Under the auspices of Office of Management and Budget

• Chaired by the National Center for Health Statistics

• Prepared recommendations for the ACS 2006 Content Test– Reviewed the legislative need for the data– Determined the main purposes of the data– Focused on meeting the needs given constraints– Conducted cognitive testing on questions

Page 9: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

9

Federal Agencies Reviewed for Statutory and/or Programmatic Requirements for Disability Data

Examples:• Department of Commerce – Telecommunications Act

of 1996• Department of Education – National Education

Reform• Administration on Aging – Older Americans Act• Department of Housing and Urban Development –

National Affordable Housing Act• Department of Transportation – Mass transportation

Elderly and Persons with Disabilities Program

Page 10: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

10

Federal Agencies Reviewed for Statutory and/or Programmatic Requirements for Disability Data - Findings

Examples:• Agencies focus on individuals with limitations in

functioning who are more likely to experience a limitation in participation as well.

• Agencies use the data for two purposes.– Distribution of benefits, such as SSDI Insurance or Veteran

health benefits– Provision of opportunities such as access to education,

housing, and communication.

Page 11: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

11

Definition of Disability Adapted by the Subcommittee

• Based on orientation of agency mandates and using IOM Model of Disability and ICF Model of Functioning and Disability (WHO)

• Disability - the restriction in participation that results from a lack of fit between the individual’s functional limitations and the characteristics of the physical and social environment.– Measuring disability then means analyzing the component

concepts that make up the process.

Page 12: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

12

Purpose of Disability Measure Recognized by the Subcommittee

• Equalization of opportunity - identify those who, without accommodation, are likely to experience restrictions in participation due to limitations in functioning

• Identify the population needing assistance to maintain independence

Page 13: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

13

Basis of questions chosen for cognitive testing• Domains of functioning that identify the largest

component of the population with disabilities– Vision– Hearing– Mobility (walking, climbing stairs)– Cognitive functioning

• Monitoring independent living– Self-care activities (bathing, dressing)– Ability to move about the community without help

• Limitation in kind or amount of work– Included for testing based on its previous use in the Census

and assumptions of its ability to capture persons with mental health related limitations

Page 14: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

14

Cognitive Testing

“Report of Cognitive Research on Proposed American Community Survey Disability Questions” by Kristen Miller of the National Center for Health Statistics and Theresa DeMaio of U.S. Census Bureau http://www.census.gov/srd/papers/pdf/ssm2006-06.pdf

– Five rounds of testing between June 2004 and February 2005

– Testing at NCHS• face-to-face and telephone interviews

– Testing at Census• paper questionnaires

– Several wordings for each domain

Page 15: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

15

Cognitive Testing – Goals

• Identify respondent interpretations • Identify potential response errors• Improve test questions • Investigate question performance within the

context of three ACS modes: self-administered paper, telephone interview, in-person interview

Page 16: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

16

Cognitive Testing – Recurring Themes

• Regardless of the type of question, respondents have an internal calculation of whether a condition or limitation is “severe enough” to report

• Some people report limitation status with assistance other report status without assistance

• Mode tended not to impact respondent’s interpretation

Page 17: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

17

Recommendations

16 a. Is this person deaf or does he/she have serious difficulty hearing? b. Is this person blind or does he/she have serious difficulty seeing

even when wearing glasses?

F) Answer question 17a if this person is 5 years old or over. Otherwise skip to the questions for Person 2 on page 12.

17 a. Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have serious difficulty concentrating, remembering, or making decisions?b. Does this person have serious difficulty walking or climbing stairs?c. Does this person have difficulty dressing or bathing?

G) Answer questions 18 if this person is 15 years old or over. Otherwise skip to the questions for Person 2 on page 12.

18. Because of a physical, mental, or emotional condition, does this person have difficulty doing errands alone such as visiting a doctor's office or shopping?

Page 18: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

18

2006 ACS Content Test

• A variety of objectives for testing– Content: e.g.. disability and health insurance– Form layout: e.g.. horizontal v. vertical roster

• Two versions of disability items– Control: ACS current production questions– Test: Recommendation from interagency work group

• Research Questions– Does the new set have more consistent reporting?– Does the new set have improved item response?– Where do these people’s disabilities fall on a spectrum of

difficulty with specific activities?

Page 19: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

19

How was the ACS Content Test data collected?

Surveys were mailed to a sample of addresses.

If no mail response was received, Census Bureau staff will attempt to contact the address in person to complete the survey.

All respondents were part of a content follow-up conducted by telephone.

Page 20: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

20

Summary of Disability Topics

17bMobility Disability16bPhysical Disability

17aCognitive Disability17aMental Disability

17cSelf-care Disability17bSelf-care Disability

18Independent-living Disability

18aGo-outside-home Disability

----------

----------18bEmployment Disability

16bSeeing Disability

16aHearing Disability16aSensory Disability

Item #LabelItem #Label

Test (Interagency Recommendation)

Control (ACS Current Production)

Page 21: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

21

Summary of How “Test” Differs from “Control”– Part 1

• The hearing and vision concepts are separate questions in the test version

• The hearing and vision questions on the test version include children under 5 years old, since the skip instruction was after these items.

• The vision question includes the qualifier “even when wearing glasses.”

• The hearing, vision, and mobility questions are simpler, omitting key terms/phrases of “long-lasting condition” and “impairment.”

Page 22: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

22

Summary of How “Test” Differs from “Control”– Part 2

• The phrase “Does this person have [serious] difficulty” is included in the test version before each function or activity.

• The test does not use terms like “substantially limits” or “long-lasting” or “lasting 6 months or more”

• The test set does not include a work disability item.

Please see the information sheet for more details.

Page 23: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

23

Selection Criteria

• Is the reliability for the test version equal to or better than the control?– For example, is the reliability for the vision and

hearing questions in the test version equal to or better than the vision and hearing question in the control version?

– Adjusted Simple Response Variance

• Are the item nonresponse rates for the test version less than or equal to that of the control?

Page 24: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

24

Survey of Income and Program Participation – Dynamics of Economic Well Being System

SIPP

General Information:http://www.sipp.census.gov/sipp/

Topical Modules – Functional Limitations

and Disability, June to September 2005

– Panels 1984 - 2004http://www.sipp.census.gov/sipp/top_mod/top_mods_chart.html

DEWShttp://www.sipp.census.gov/sipp/

dews.html

• Reengineering the SIPP - PDF presentation by David Johnson, Chief, HHES at the U.S. Census Bureau

• Reengineering the SIPP: Brookings/Census Roundtable (MS Word document)

• August 24, 2006 Stakeholder Presentation

• Presentation Stakeholder matrix

Page 25: Disability Data in the American Community Survey Presentation for the 2006 State-of-the-Science Conference - The Future of Disability Statistics: What.

25

Contacts

Sharon M. [email protected]

Matthew [email protected]


Recommended