Date post: | 06-Jan-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | baldwin-snow |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Discussion and Preliminary Findings Concerning Voltage Reduction (VR) for
Peak Shaving
Mark CarpenterSr. VP T&D OperationsDecember 6, 2012
December 6, 2012Presentation to Reliability Operations SubcommitteeAustin, TX
Voltage Reduction Demand Response (VR) Overview
Historically, the effectiveness of VR in ERCOT has been viewed to provide minimal effectiveness during short supply conditions; Nationwide, the use of VR is on the increase; Present residential HVAC loads appear to respond favorably to VR; Nationally, more effectively harvesting the benefits of VR is improved due to:
Improvements in load tap-changer (LTC) control systems Ability to inexpensively monitor voltage along the distribution
circuit Ability to flatten the voltage along the distribution feeder
2
What others in the utility space are seeing:
Across all circuits, for a 1% drop in voltage, many claim a 0.7 % drop in sustainable demand reduction is obtained;
Typical voltage reductions are limited to 5%;
This results in a demand reduction of 3.5%;
Generally, the reductions on residential loads is greater than industrial loads;
The VAR reduction due to VR is greater than the power reduction;
No adverse customer impact has been noted.
3
Residential air-conditioner load appears to respond well at reduced voltage because:
AC motors are typically rated 230 volts ( not 240 volts)
Motors that are not variable speed drive that are not fully loaded run more efficiently at reduced voltage
Historic view/usage of VR in ERCOT
Oncor is the only TDSP using VR in ERCOT (EEA2 Reactive Reserve < 1750 MW)
Oncor’s use is limited in scope Automatic controls only installed on 219 out of 1040 substation transformers that
have LTCs Manual controls via patrolmen can be used on other transformers
Oncor’s use is limited in sophistication Automatic controls fool LTC controllers by adding selectable 2.5% or 5% boosting
transformer in control circuit to “fool” normal LTC controller
5
For EEA Step 2 –>or= 124V …………5%123.9V to 121V ….. 2.5%<121V …………….. 0%
While the Oncor LTC control system is simple, it does not fully harvest the VR potential:
Because the voltage is always lowering at the beginning of the event, as soon as the voltage gets within the bandwidth of the controller, the controls stop lowering the voltage. Therefore, the voltage always ends up being left above the nominal set point, up to 1.49 V above it (assuming the LTC is set with a 3 V bandwidth). Also, because the trigger event usually occurs as load is increasing, there is a high probability that the voltage will start off in the lower half of the voltage band prior to the voltage reduction event being triggered.
6
PUCT Present Voltage RequirementsPUCT Substantive Rule 25.51 references ANSI C84.1 voltage requirementsRange B necessarily results from the practical design and operating conditions on supply and/or user systems, which are part of practical operations. However, such conditions should be limited in extent, duration and frequency. Corrective measures shall be undertaken within a reasonable time to bring back voltages within Range A limits, in cases of Range B values occurrence.
110 Volts
Where Utilities typically operate
Where utilities operate during VR events
Summer 2012 Testing
8
Example Test – Temple North
LOAD COMPARISON VR (9/6) VS NO VR (9/5)
10
9/5 (101.8F) 9/6 (102.5F) Difference
LOAD COMPARISON VR (9/6) VS NO VR (9/5)
11
9/5 (101.8F) 9/6 (102.5F) Difference
Interpolating Oncor’s test results shows significant peak shaving possibility
12
CategoryCurrent Process (5% &
2.5% Reduction) 5% Reduction ProcessVoltage Target
Reduction SchemeEffectiveness (% MW
Reduction)1.67% 2.95% 2.67%
Benefits
Proven Process Greatest VR BenefitMitigates Low Voltage Risk
While More Logically Reducing Voltage
Risks
Results in Least Load Shed Mitigation
Greatest Potential for Low Voltage Issues
New Scheme Required - Up-Front Cost and New
ProceduresInterpolated VR
potential (2011 Peak) - MW
328.4 580.4 525.3
Current VR XFMRs – 13%
VR Upgrade Capable XFMRs – 49%
No VR Capability XFMRs – 38% Transformers with LTCs or voltage
regulatorsTransformers w/o
LTCs or voltage regulators
Longer-term varying levels of VR benefit can be obtained depending on the system investment made:
13
VR Baseline
Improve LTC Control System
Monitor/control with end of feeder voltage
Modify feeder to flatten voltage
profile
$
$
$$$
Amount of improvement not yet defined
Given industry experience and these tests result, Oncor recommends that ROS:
Establish a task force to investigate the potential use of voltage reduction to assist with ERCOT’s resource adequacy challenges by: Reviewing what others are doing in the industry and how they are doing it Facilitating testing across ERCOT to validate the VR benefit Determining the applicability of VR in ERCOT
QUESTIONS/Discussion?