+ All Categories
Home > Social Media > Discussion forum(sangwon)

Discussion forum(sangwon)

Date post: 03-Jul-2015
Category:
Upload: sangwon-lee
View: 84 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
discussion forum
23
Observation of online forums Sangwon Lee
Transcript
Page 1: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Observation of online forums

Sangwon Lee

Page 2: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Why political issue My interest

Flanigan & Zingale (2009)

Party affiliation as a useful shortcut

Strong partisanship blindly adopt the positions

Important : how partisans think and communicate

“ Partisanship is the single most important influence

on political opinions and voting behaviors. No model

of voting behavior or public opinion is complete

without some measure of party identification”

Page 3: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Why online forum?

How people interact

How people make political reasoning

process in this internet era.

How people express, exchange, and form

their opinions in online sphere.

Page 4: Discussion forum(sangwon)

How to analyze?

Qualitative method

Observation

Writing once a week

Quantitative method

Content analysis on top-popular postings

(2014.1.1-3.13 // More than 25 replies)

Page 5: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Common Aspects

1) Function

A platform to discuss/share political news

2) Homophily network (McPherson, Smith-

Lovin, & Cook, 2001).

Like-minded groups

Page 6: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Different Aspects

1. Focusing area

Con: Ideological or policy issues >

Election or political figures

Dem: Election or political figures >

Ideological or policy issues

Page 7: Discussion forum(sangwon)

What do they focus?

35.3%(12)

52.9%(18)

11.8%(4)

Conservativesforum.com

Election or political

figures

Ideological or

policy issues

Etc

Page 8: Discussion forum(sangwon)

What do they focus?

64.4%(29)

31.1%(14)

4.4%(2)

Democraticunderground.com

Election or political

figuresIdeological or policy

issuesEtc

Page 9: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Election/ Political figure(Con)

Have their preferred candidates(Paul,Cruz, Christie..)

But low polarized attitudes toward the figure

Page 10: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Election/ Political figure (Con)

“Rand Paul wins CPAC straw Poll”(Replies: 44)

Page 11: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Election/ Political figure(Dem)

Polarized attitudes toward the figure.

Top 2 postings on the website

“The Why-Hillary in 2016” (Replies: 457)

“Ohhhh now Hillary is the big bad wolf” (Replies: 188)

Page 12: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Election/ Political figure(Dem)“Hillary or not Hillary?” (87 replies)

Page 13: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Political Issues(Con)

0

1

2

3

4

Issues

Diplomacy/Security

Immigrant/race

Economy/financial

Express patriotism

Party itself/Party id

Marijuana

Salient ideological themes: loyalty ,authority, patriotism,

Americanism

Page 14: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Political Issues(Dem)

0

1

2

3

4

Issues

Economy/financial

Diplomacy/security

Party issue/id

Climate change

Executive order

Health Care

Loyalty, authority, patriotism, and Americanism themes

much smaller

Page 15: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Other communicative characteristics

DemocraticundergroundConservativeforums

1. Tone

Joking, light, sarcastic

* Republicans are out-

dated, dumb, empty-

headed

1. Tone

Serious, resolute-

determined

* Obama accelerates

the collapse of U.S.

We have to save it

with loyalty.

Page 16: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Other communicative characteristics

DemocraticundergroundConservativeforums

2. Image Use 2. Image Use

NO

Page 17: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Conclusion

Both:

Political platform

Homophily network (Like-minded groups)

Con : Ideological or policy issues >

Election or political figures

Dem : Election or political figures>

Ideological or policy issues

Page 18: Discussion forum(sangwon)

<Election>

Higher polarizing figure for Dem.

<Issue>

Some issues are different: Immigrant (race) issue

& Issues related with patriotism

But, much more different ideological themes

(loyalty, authority, patriotism, and Americanism

much higher in Con)

Page 19: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Limitation

Lack rigorousness

Observation: Depend on my intuition

Data: Restricted to ‘very hot topic’ (25)

: 2014~ (Not representative)

->Hard to generalize!

Page 20: Discussion forum(sangwon)

What have I learned?

What kind of postings gain popularity.

What users are concerned about

How people actually interact in online forums.

Interesting experience.

Motivate me to study more about U.S. politics.

Page 21: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Bartels, L. M. (2000). Partisanship and voting behavior, 1952-

1996. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 35-50.

Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political

perceptions. Political Behavior, 24, 117-150.

Bartels, L. M. (2003). Democracy with attitudes. In M. MacKuen & G.

Rabinowitz (Eds.), Electoral democracy (pp. 48–82). Ann Arbor, MI :

University of Michigan Press.

Campbell, A., Philip, E. C., Warren, E. M., & Donald, E. S. (1960). The

American Voter. Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press.

Downs, A. (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY:

Harper and Row.

Flanigan, W. H., & Zingale, N. H. (1999). Political Behavior of the

American Electorate 9th Ed. Washington: Congressional Quarterly

Press.

References

Page 22: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Green, D., Palmquist, B., & Schickler, E. (2002). Partisan Hearts and Minds. New Haven, CT : Yale University Press.

Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. The Innate Mind, 3, 367-391.

Layman, G. C., Carsey, T. M., & Horowitz, J. M. (2006). Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, 9, 83-110.

Lewis-Beck, M. S., Jacoby, W., Norpoth, H., & Weisberg, H. F. (2008).The American voter revisited. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 415-444.

Shively, W. P. (1979). The development of party identification among adults: Exploration of a functional model. The American Political Science Review, 1039-1054.

Page 23: Discussion forum(sangwon)

Thank You ! ! !


Recommended