Date post: | 23-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | brooke-carpenter |
View: | 223 times |
Download: | 0 times |
DISPUTE RESOLUTIONDISPUTE RESOLUTION
Collie Edgar NormanCollie Edgar Norman
Interim Program DirectorInterim Program Director
Office of Dispute ResolutionOffice of Dispute Resolution
Dispute Resolution ActDispute Resolution Act§ 13-22-301 § 13-22-301 et seq.et seq.
• Any Court of Record
• Any Case
• Mediation Services
• Dispute Resolution Programs
• Ancillary Forms of Alternative Dispute Resolution
FORMS OF DISPUTE FORMS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTIONRESOLUTION
• Mediation
• Settlement Conference
• Arbitration
• Med-arb
• Early Neutral Evaluation
FORMS OF DISPUTE FORMS OF DISPUTE RESOLUTIONRESOLUTION
• Fact Finding
• Mini-trial
• Special Master
• Summary Jury Trial
• Multi-door Courthouse
MediationMediation• Intervention
• Dispute Negotiations
• Trained
• Neutral
• Third Party
• Assist
• Own Solutions
Settlement ConferenceSettlement Conference• Informal Assessment and Negotiation
Session
• Legal professional
• Hears both sides
• May advise
• Law and Precedent
• May suggest settlement
ArbitrationArbitration
• One or More Neutral Third Parties
• Decision
• Based on Evidence and Testimony
Early Neutral EvaluationEarly Neutral Evaluation•Early Intervention•Court Appointed Evaluator•Narrow, Eliminate and Simplify Issues•Assist in Case Planning and Management•Settlement May Occur
Fact FindingFact Finding
• Investigation
• Public or Private Body
• Examines Issues and Facts
• May or May Not Recommend
• Settlement Procedures
Mini-TrialMini-Trial
• Structured Settlement Process
• Principles Meet at Hearing
• Neutral Advisor
• Merits Presented
• Settlement Discussions
Special MasterSpecial Master• Court-Appointed
• Magistrate, Auditor or Examiner
• Court Order Defines Scope
• Regulate Proceedings and Hearings
• Do All Acts – Take All Measures
• Compliance with Court’s Order
Summary Jury TrialSummary Jury Trial
• Summary Presentations
• Complex Case
• Jury
• May or May Not Be Binding
Multi-Door CourthouseMulti-Door Courthouse
• Parties Select
• Any Combination
• Problem Solving Methods
• Effective Resolution
Case Screening: Case Screening: Which Cases to Refer to ADRWhich Cases to Refer to ADR
Need SPEEDY Resolution
Need LESS COSTLY Process
Need PERSONALIZED OUTCOMES
Neutral 3rd PARTY INPUT helpful
RELATIONSHIP is on-going
Potential for INTEGRATIVE SOLUTIONS
NON-LEGAL ISSUES
Court Decision WILL NOT RESOLVE Issues
Need to PREVENT FUTURE DISPUTES
PARTIES WILLING to try non-traditional approach
Case Screening: Case Screening: Which Cases Not to Refer to ADRWhich Cases Not to Refer to ADR
CAUTION - Maybe Not• Need CONSISTENT
outcomes• Need full PUBLIC RECORD• Significant GOVERNMENT
POLICY• Outcome affects PERSONS
NOT AT PROCEEDING• DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
DO NOT SEND:
Ø Need to set a PRECEDENT
Ø DOMESTIC VIOLENCE and Party(ies) UNWILLING
Timing of referrals to ADR:Timing of referrals to ADR:OptionsOptions
Front end• Early in the case, e.g.
– Within 120 days of case at issue (civil)
– At 30 days (dom rel)• At case management
conference– Referral by FCF– Order by judge or
magistrate
Back end• E.g. 80 days
before trial (civil)
Timing of referrals to ADR:Timing of referrals to ADR:ConsiderationsConsiderations
• Benefits of Early Referral:Increased possibility
of resolutionEarlier resolutionMore savings for
parties and the courtParties may be less
positional
• Benefits of Later Referral:More information availableMore time for parties to
settle without 3rd party intervention
Parties may be more motivated
Parties may be less emotional
WHY?WHY?Case Management BenefitsCase Management Benefits
Faster resolution More stipulations Fewer motions Fewer continuances Less court trial/hearing time Fewer post-judgment/post-decree filings Higher compliance rates More predictable dockets
WHY?WHY?Additional BenefitsAdditional Benefits
High party satisfactionIncreased satisfaction with the justice
systemHigh or higher quality resolutionsPreservation of relationshipsMore effective communicationClosure