Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, lipid profile and oxidative stress in Meagre (Argyrosomus regius) juveniles Maria João Magalhães de Almeida Xavier Mestrado em Recursos Biológicos Aquáticos Biologia da FCUP 2014/2015 Supervisor Prof. Doutor Pedro Pousão, Investigador Auxiliar, EPPO Co-Supervisor Prof. Doutor Aires Oliva-Teles, Professor Catedrático, FCUP
Todas as correções determinadas pelo júri, e só essas, foram efetuadas.
O Presidente do Júri,
Porto, /_ /
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
Acknowledgments I would like express my gratitude to my supervisor, Dr. Pedro Ferreira Pousão for the opportunity to work in the Olhão Aquaculture Research Station. For guiding me throughout the work of this dissertation and for all the support given and knowledge shared over this last year. A very special thanks to my co-supervisor Prof. Dr. Aires Oliva-Teles for his excellent guidance throughout this work. His immense scientific knowledge was an incentive to go further on and essential for the accomplishment of this dissertation. Thanks to the Dra. Narcisa Bandarra (L-IPMA/INRB, IP) for accepting me at IPMA laboratory and to guide me. To Dr. Jorge Dias and SPAROS Ltd, for the supply of diets used in this study, and their critical view have also contributed to the establishment of this research. I am especially grateful to all the members of EPPO for receiving me and providing me a stimulating and fun environment in which I had the opportunity to learn and grow. In particular to Ana Mendes for having guided me during the practical work. I would like to extend my thanks to Sara Costa for the entire accessibility and affection that has always shown. Throughout the time spent and for what taught me the laboratory level. A heartfelt thanks to all the members of Nutrimo laboratory and the Marine Zoology Station, for their help and friendship. Especially to Carolina Castro that taught me so much and spent the time to accompany me. To pilot project meagre cultivation in several production systems - "AQUACOR". PROMAR 31-03-05FEP-003 All my dear friends that were always present when I needed the most. A sincere thank you to Sofia Abrunheiro, Filipe Silva, Luis Esteves and Diana Moura for the work they have put in the review of this document. Last and most especially I would like to express my gratitude to my family who have always supported and encouraged me as well as for the unconditional love.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
Abstract
Meagre (Argyrosomus regius, Asso, 1801) is a new species within in the
Mediterranean aquaculture industry and introduced to diversify the number of
cultured species. Meagre flesh is characterized by a high protein and low lipid
content, having a recommended nutritional quality. Moreover, it exhibit a high content
of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), mainly represented by a high proportion of n-3
PUFA, whose importance for human health, has been continuously increasing in the
last decades. These fatty acids (FA) are essential nutrients with a variety of important
structural, functional and signaling roles. Furthermore, highly unsaturated fatty acid
(HUFA) the phospholipids (PL) requirement has been documented to be essential
nutrients for larval and juvenile marine fish in regulation of a wide range of cellular
functions.
The present study was therefore designed and carried out to investigate the effects
of increased levels of PL (1.0 to 4.0 %) and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) (1.0 to
2.0%) on the diet (at a constant lipid, protein and starch level), in growth
performance, fatty acid and lipid class composition of different organs and oxidative
state of meagre juveniles was also evaluated.
For that purpose, a total of 1800 juveniles, with mean initial weight 13.8± 2.0g, were
randomly assigned into 12 tanks, to perform analysis in triplicate for the 4 treatments
(diet A, B, C and D), fed, ad libitum, three times a day for 81 days.
Results showed that dietary enrichment of PL and DHA didn’t exert any influence in
the survival rate of juveniles of meagre. In terms of growth performance, specific
growth rate (SGR) and final body wet weight (FBW) were increased with the
combination of 4.0% PL and 2.0% DHA in the diet and the feed conversion ratio
(FCR) showed best results with higher PL percentage in the diet.
The use of 4.0% PL and 2.0% DHA diet promoted whole-body lipid retention as well
as higher energy content.
FA composition in the analyzed organs were correlated to the used diet. Therefore,
increasing DHA concentration in the diet resulted in a higher accumulation of DHA in
body tissues. DHA tissue distribution showed a higher accumulation in the brain than
in muscle or liver.
Finally, regarding the liver oxidative status, the liver lipid peroxidation levels observed
were similar in all diet treatments applied on this study. However, in diets with higher
PL percentage the activity of superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glucose-6-phosphate
dehydrogenase (G6PDH) was significantly increased.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
In conclusion, this work showed that juveniles of meagre achieve an increasing
growth performance with an increase of 4.0% of PL in the diet. The increasing DHA
concentration in diet led to a higher retention of this essential FA in the muscle. No
major changes were also observed in lipid peroxidation levels related to an increase
of PL and DHA in the diet.
Keywords: Argyrosomus regius; Growth performance; Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids;
Docosahexaenoic acid; Phospholipids; Oxidative stress; Fatty acid composition.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
Resumo Corvina (Argyrosomus regius, Asso, 1801) é uma nova espécie dentro da indústria
da aquicultura do Mediterrâneo, introduzida para diversificar o número de espécies
cultivadas. A qualidade nutricional da corvina é considerada muito boa,
caracterizada por um elevado teor de proteínas e baixo teor de lipídios. Além disso,
apresenta um elevado teor de ácidos gordos polinsaturados (PUFA), representado,
principalmente, por uma alta proporção de n-3 PUFA, cuja atenção tem aumentado
continuamente durante as últimas décadas para a saúde humana. Estes ácidos
gordos (FA) são nutrientes essenciais com uma variedade de papéis importantes a
nível estrutural, funcional e de sinalização. Tal como estes ácidos gordos
polinsaturados (HUFA) os requisitos de fosfolípidos (PL) têm sido documentados
como sendo nutrientes essenciais para larvas e juvenis de peixes marinhos ao nível
da regulação de uma vasta gama de funções celulares.
O presente estudo foi, por conseguinte, concebido e realizado para investigar os
efeitos do aumento dos níveis dietéticos de PL (1,0 a 4,0%) e ácido
docosahexanóico (DHA) (1,0 a 2,0%), com um nível de lípidos, proteínas e energia
constantes, no desempenho do crescimento. Também se avaliou o perfil dos ácidos
gordos e a classe de lípidos dos diferentes órgãos e estado oxidativo dos juvenis de
corvina.
Para esse objetivo, um total de 1800 juvenis, com peso médio inicial 13,8± 2,0g,
foram distribuídos ao acaso por 12 tanques, de forma a ter triplicados para os 4
diferentes tratamentos (dietas A, B, C e D) alimentados, ad libitum, três vezes ao dia
durante um período de 81 dias.
Os resultados mostraram que aumento de PL e DHA nas dietas não exerce
qualquer influência na taxa de sobrevivência dos juvenis de corvina. Quanto à
performance de crescimento, a taxa de crescimento específica e peso médio final
obtiveram um aumento com a combinação de 4,0% PL e 2,0% DHA na dieta e a
taxa de conversão alimentar mostrou melhores resultados com maior percentagem
de fosfolípidos na dieta.
A dieta com concentração de 4,0% de PL e 2,0% de DHA promoveu uma retenção
de lípidos no corpo inteiro, assim como um conteúdo energético mais elevado.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
A composição de FA nos órgãos analisados refletiu a suplementação da dieta
aplicada. Assim, o aumento da concentração de DHA na dieta resultou numa maior
acumulação de DHA nos tecidos corporais analisados. A distribuição de DHA nos
tecidos mostrou uma acumulação mais elevada no cérebro quando comparado com
o tecido muscular e hepático.
Finalmente, em relação ao estado oxidativo do fígado, os níveis verificados de
peroxidação lipídica no fígado foram semelhantes em todos os tratamentos
dietéticos implementados no presente estudo. Contudo, nas dietas com maior
percentagem de PL a superóxido dismutase (SOD) e a glucose-6-phosphate
desidrogenase (G6PDH) mostrou uma maior atividade.
Em conclusão, os resultados deste trabalho mostram que os juvenis de corvina
obtiveram um aumento no desempenho de crescimento com um aumento de 4,0%
de PL na dieta. O aumento da concentração de DHA na dieta induziu uma maior
retenção deste FA no tecido muscular. Não foram observadas grandes alterações
nos níveis de peroxidação lipídica em relação ao aumento de PL e DHA na dieta.
Palavras-chave: Argyrosomus regius; Performance de crescimento; Ácidos gordos
polinsaturados; Ácido docosahexanóico; Fosfolípidos; Stress oxidativo; Composição
de ácidos gordos.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
Index
1- INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................. 1
1.1- State of Aquaculture ............................................................................................................................ 1
1.2- Meagre ....................................................................................................................................................... 2
1.3- Meagre Aquaculture ............................................................................................................................. 3
1.4- Fish Nutrition .......................................................................................................................................... 5
1.5- Lipids .......................................................................................................................................................... 7
1.6- Fatty acids ................................................................................................................................................ 8
1.7- Phospholipids ...................................................................................................................................... 11
1.8- Oxidative Stress .................................................................................................................................. 12
1.9- Objectives .............................................................................................................................................. 14
2- MATERIAL AND METHODS ........................................................................ 15
2.1- Diets ......................................................................................................................................................... 15
2.2- Experimental conditions ................................................................................................................. 17
2.3- Sampling ................................................................................................................................................ 17
2.4- Analytical Methods ............................................................................................................................ 18 2.4.1- Zootechnical parameters .......................................................................................................................... 18 2.4.2- Proximate analysis ....................................................................................................................................... 18 2.4.3- Tissue lipids ..................................................................................................................................................... 19
2.4.3.1- Lipid classes .......................................................................................................................................... 19 2.4.3.2- Fatty-acids .............................................................................................................................................. 19
2.4.4- Oxidative stress ............................................................................................................................................. 20
2.5- Statistical analysis ............................................................................................................................. 22
3- RESULTS ....................................................................................................... 23
3.1- Diet composition ................................................................................................................................. 23
3.2- Growth trial ........................................................................................................................................... 24
3.3- Whole-body composition ................................................................................................................ 25
3.4- Lipid composition .............................................................................................................................. 26
3.5- Oxidative Stress .................................................................................................................................. 37
4- DISCUSSION ................................................................................................. 38
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
4.1- Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 44
5- REFERENCES ............................................................................................... 46
Figure Index FIGURE 1: FISHERY PRODUCTION IN LIVE WEIGHT EQUIVALENT FOR AQUACULTURE
(LEFT) AND CAPTURE (RIGHT). SOURCE: OECD AND FAO SECRETARIATS, 2014. ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 2
FIGURE 2: MEAGRE (ARGYROSOMUS REGIUS, ASSO, 1801) SOURCE: IRIDA’S RESEARCH FOR MEAGRE CULTURE ..................................................................................................... 3
FIGURE 3: GLOBAL PRODUCTION OF FISHMEAL AND FISH OIL. SOURCE: FAO, 2014 ... 7 FIGURE 4: THE METABOLIC PATHWAYS BY WHICH ESSENTIAL FATTY ACIDS ARE
CONVERTED TO LONGER CHAIN, MORE UNSATURATED DERIVATIVES. SOURCE: NARAYAN ET AL., 2015 .............................................................................................................. 9
FIGURE 5: PATHWAYS OF CONVERSION OF ARAQUIDONIC ACID 20:4 (N-6) AND EICOSAPENTAENOIC ACID 20:5 (N-3) TO EICOSANOIDS. SOUCE: LALL, 2000 ...... 10
FIGURE 6: VARIATION OF DIFFERENT FATTY ACIDS EICOSAPENTAENOIC ACID (EPA), DOCOSAHEXAENOIC ACID (DHA), ARACHIDONIC ACID (ARA), TOTAL SATURATED FATTY ACID (ΣSFA), TOTAL MONOUNSATURATED FATTY ACID (ΣMUFA) AND TOTAL POLYUNSATURETED FATTY ACID (ΣPUFA) IN THE LIVER, BRAIN AND MUSCLE (IN MG/G) OF ARGYROSOMUS REGIUS FED THE EXPERIMENTAL DIETS. RESULTS FROM TWO WAY ANOVA ARE REFLECTED; ASTERISKS INDICATE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES AS *P<0.05; N.S. INDICATES NON SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES. ........................................................................................................ 33
FIGURE 7: VARIATION OF DIFFERENT LIPID CLASS, TRIACYLGLYCEROLS (TAG); FREE FATTY ACIDS (FFA); CHOLESTEROL (CH); DIACYLGLYCEROL (DAG); MONOACYLGLYCEROL (MAG); PHOSPHOLIPIDS (PL), IN THE LIVER, BRAIN AND MUSCLE (IN %) OF ARGYROSOMUS REGIUS FED THE EXPERIMENTAL DIETS. RESULTS FROM TWO WAY ANOVA ARE REFLECTED ASTERISKS INDICATE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES AS *P<0.05; N.S. INDICATES NON SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES. .................................................................................................................................................... 36
Table Index TABLE 1: FORMULATION OF EXPERIMENTAL DIETS. .......................................................................... 16 TABLE 2: FATTY ACID COMPOSITION OF THE DIFFERENT EXPERIMENTAL DIETS
(RESULTS IN % AND MG/G FATTY ACID) .......................................................................................... 23 TABLE 3: LIPID CLASS OF DIFFERENT EXPERIMENTAL DIETS (RESULTS IN %) ............. 24 TABLE 4: GROWTH PERFORMANCE, FEED UTILIZATION, CONDITION AND HEPATIC
INDICES OF ARGYROSOMUS REGIUS FED THE EXPERIMENTAL DIET. .................... 25 TABLE 5: WHOLE-BODY COMPOSITION (DRY MATTER) OF ARGYROSOMUS REGIUS
FED THE EXPERIMENTAL DIET. .............................................................................................................. 26 TABLE 6: LIVER FATTY ACID COMPOSITION (MG/G FATTY ACIDS) OF ARGYROSOMUS
REGIUS FED THE EXPERIMENTAL DIETS. ....................................................................................... 27 TABLE 7: BRAIN FATTY ACID COMPOSITION (MG/G FATTY ACIDS) OF ARGYROSOMUS
REGIUS FED THE EXPERIMENTAL DIETS. ....................................................................................... 28 TABLE 8: MUSCLE FATTY ACID COMPOSITION (MG/G FATTY ACIDS) OF
ARGYROSOMUS REGIUS FED THE EXPERIMENTAL DIETS. .............................................. 29 TABLE 9: LIVER FATTY ACID COMPOSITION (MG/G FATTY ACIDS) OF ARGYROSOMUS
REGIUS FED THE EXPERIMENTAL DIETS. ....................................................................................... 30 TABLE 10: BRAIN FATTY ACID COMPOSITION (% FATTY ACIDS) OF ARGYROSOMUS
REGIUS FED THE EXPERIMENTAL DIETS. ....................................................................................... 31
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
TABLE 11: MUSCLE FATTY ACID COMPOSITION (% OF TOTAL FATTY ACIDS) OF
ARGYROSOMUS REGIUS FED THE EXPERIMENTAL DIETS. .............................................. 32 TABLE 12: LIPID CLASS COMPOSITION (% TOTAL OF LIPID CLASS) AND FAT
DEPOSITION (%) OF LIVER, BRAIN AND MUSCLE OF ARGYROSOMUS REGIUS FED THE EXPERIMENTAL DIETS. ........................................................................................................... 35
TABLE 13: ACTIVITIES OF GLUTATHIONE PEROXIDASE (GPX; MU MG−1 PROTEIN), SUPEROXIDE DISMUTASE (SOD), GLUCOSE-6-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE (G6PDH), GLUTATHIONE REDUCTASE (GR), AND CATALASE (CAT) (U MG−1 PROTEIN), AND TBARS CONTENT (NMOL MDA G TISSUE−1) OF ARGYROSOMUS REGIUS FED THE EXPERIMENTAL DIETS ........................................................................................ 37
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
Abbreviations index ARA - Arachidonic Acid
ALA - α-Linolenic Acid
BW - Body Weight
BHT - Butylated Hydroxytoluene
CAT - Catalase
CH- Cholesterol
K - Condition Factor
DAG - Diacylglycerol
DHA - Docosahexaenoic Acid
DM - Dry Matter
EPA - Eicosapentaenoic Acid
EFA - Essential Fatty Acid
EPPO - Estação Piloto de Piscicultura
de Olhão
FA - Fatty Acids
FAME - Fatty Acid Methyl Esters
FCR - Feed Conversion Ratio
FBW - Final Body Wet Weight
FID - Flame Ionization Detector
FAO - Food and Agriculture
Organization
FFA - Free Fatty Acids
GC - Gas Chromatographer
G6PDH - Glucose-6-phosphate
Dehydrogenase
GPX - Glutathione Peroxidase
GR - Glutathione Reductase
HIS - Hepatosomatic Index
HUFA - Highly Unsaturated Fatty Acid
H2O2 - Hydrogen Peroxide
HO· - Hydroxyl Radicals
IPMA - Instituto Português do Mar e
da Atmosfera
LA - Linoleic Acid
LPO - Lipid Peroxidation
MDA - Malondialdehyde
MAG - Monoacylglycerol
MUFA - Monounsaturated Fatty Acids
MDA - Nanomoles Malondialdehyde
GSSG - Oxidized Glutathione
PL- Phospholipids
PUFA - Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
ROS - Reactive Oxygen Species
GSH - Reduced Glutathione
SFA - Saturated Fatty Acids 1O2 -‐ Singlet Oxygen SGR - Specific Growth Rate
O2− - Superoxide Anions
SOD - Superoxide Dismutase
TLC - Thin Layer Cromatography
TBA - Thiobarbituric Acid
TBARS - Thiobarbituric Acid Reactive
Substances
TAG - Triacylglycerol
TCA - Trichloroacetic Acid
VFI - Voluntary Feed Intake
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
1
1- Introduction
1.1- State of Aquaculture Despite the increasing of world population, beyond 7 billion persons in 2015, the
world per capita apparent fish consumption increased from an average of 9.9 kg in
the 1960s to 19.2 kg in 2012. This was possible because global fish production has
grown steadily over the last five decades, with food fish supply increasing at an
average annual rate of 3.2 percent (FAO, 2014).
Fish and fishery products are among the most traded food commodities worldwide,
with trade volumes and values reaching new highs in 2011, and are expected to
carry on rising. However, this increase in fish demand causes huge pressure in wild
stocks leaving an increased percentage of overexploited fish stocks and decreased
proportion of non-fully exploited species. Of the world fish stocks assessed in 2011,
61.3 percent were fully-exploited and only 9.9 percent were under-exploited. While
capture fisheries production remains stable, aquaculture represents the only viable
solution to prevent the depletion of aquatic resources (FAO, 2014).
The contribution of farmed food fish has a record of 42.2 percent of the total 158
million tons of fish produced by capture fisheries (including for non-food uses) and
aquaculture in 2012 (FAO, 2014).
In terms of production, global aquaculture provided 90.4 million tons (live weight
equivalent) in 2012 (US$144.4 billion), including 66.6 million tons of food fish
(US$137.7 billion). According to the latest information, FAO estimated that world food
fish aquaculture production rose by 5.8 percent, to 70.5 million tons in 2013. The
global trend of aquaculture development is gaining importance in total fish supply,
and continues to grow strongly, yet at a slower rate (figure 1).
The development and distribution of aquaculture products is not uniform in all regions
of the world (Gjedrem et al., 2012). Asia accounted for 89 percent of world’s
aquaculture production by volume in 2010, with the share of freshwater aquaculture
gradually increasing to 65.6 percent in 2010, from around 60 percent in the 1990s.
Africa has increased its contribution to global production from 1.2 percent to 2.2
percent in the past ten years, mainly as a result of a rapid development in freshwater
fish farming in sub-Saharan Africa. Europe and Oceania had the lowest average
annual growth rates in the period 2000–2012, at 2.9 and 3.5 percent, respectively. In
North America aquaculture has ceased expanding in the recent past years, but in
South America it has shown strong and continuous growth, particularly in Brazil and
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
2
Peru. Some developed countries like Japan, The United States of America and
several European countries have reduced their aquaculture output in recent years,
mainly owing to competition from countries with lower production costs (FAO, 2014).
Figure 1: Fishery production in live weight equivalent for aquaculture (left) and capture (right). Source: OECD and FAO Secretariats, 2014.
1.2- Meagre Meagre, Argyrosomus regius (Asso, 1801), is a teleost fish of the family Sciaenidae,
which includes 70 genera and 270 species (Nelson, 1994) distributed in subtropical
waters such as Mediterranean and Black Sea and along the Atlantic coasts of
Europe and Africa (Poli et al., 2003). Meagre is nectobentonic, and inhabits inshore
and shelf waters close to the bottom, as well as surface and midwaters from 15 to
about 200 m in sandy bottoms and grassland of Posidonia (Whitehead et al., 1986).
This species exhibits a big head and an elongated, fusiform and slightly compressed
body. It has a dorsal silver-grey color with bronze trails and an evident lateral line
(figure 2). In the wild this species can grow up to 2 m and reach 50 kg, but it is more
frequent to capture individuals between 50 cm and 1 meter in length (Cárdenas,
2010).
A. regius has a relatively big terminal mouth, with small teeth disposed in several
series. It is a carnivorous species, very voracious and has a diet based on
polychaete worms, crustaceans, echinoderms, mollusks, and small fish (Jimenez et
al., 2005).
It is a gregarious species, moving in small groups, and displaying anadromous
behavior, migrating to spawn from deep waters to coastal areas like estuaries and
salt marshes between the months of April and June (Monfort, 2010). Areas that
remain important for spawning are the estuary of the river Gironde, Bay of Biscay,
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
3
France (Quéméner et al., 2002), river Tejo, Portugal and river Guadiana, Southern
Spain and Portugal (Gonzalez-Quiros et al., 2011). This species is capable of
reaching these areas because it is eurithermal and eurihaline, resisting sudden
changes in temperature from 2 to 38 °C and of salinity from 5 to 39 ‰.
The majority of Sciaenid species are iteroparous, reproducing more than once in a
lifetime and gonochoric, only have one distinct sex per organism.
Average world catches of A. regius were of 4408 tons per year from 2005 to 2007
(FAO, 2007). However, this value may have been higher as FAO data for some
countries were unavailable, or wrongly estimated.
Meagre is considered a highly susceptible species because it forms large spawning
aggregations and produces conspicuous sounds when migrating to shallow waters,
with substantial fishing effort during the reproductive season. Furthermore, the
spawning habitats of the species (river mouths and lagoons) often suffer serious
environmental deterioration (Quéro and Vayne, 1987; Sadovy and Cheung, 2003).
This reproductive behavior, coupled with the general worldwide tendency to overfish
top predators (Christensen et al., 2003), including adult and juvenile meagre
(Quéméner, 2002), and the lack of basic biological information about the species,
have raised concerns about the status of meagre stocks.
In Mediterranean waters, meagre populations have suffered an alarming decline in
numbers (Quéro and Vayne, 1987) and have disappeared from the Balearic Islands
(Western Mediterranean), where the species is considered to be in critical danger
(Mayol et al., 2000).
Figure 2: Meagre (Argyrosomus regius, Asso, 1801) Source: IRIDA’s research for meagre culture
1.3- Meagre Aquaculture The history of meagre aquaculture is quite recent, it is farmed in Europe since the
late nineties. The first commercial production was recorded in France in 1997. Since
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
4
then, production has expanded slowly in nearby regions, especially on the
Tyrrhenian side of the Italian coast and in Corsica.
Total aquaculture production has raised from a few tons in 2000 to 2200 tons in
Egypt, 1348 tons in Spain, 418 tons in France, 102 tons in Italy, and 44 tons in
Portugal, in 2009 (FAO, 2011).
Mediterranean mariculture has been dominated by the production of gilthead
seabream (Sparus aurata) and European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Meagre
has potential characteristics suitable for aquaculture diversification, because it
adapts easily to captivity, exhibits high growth rates (>1 kg year per year), which is
much more than the growth potential of currently cultured species, it has an excellent
feed conversion rate (0.9–1.2 depending on the feed) (Quéro and Vayne, 1997;
Quèmèner, 2002) and tolerates wide ranges of temperature and salinity. It has a high
nutritional value owing to the fact it is a lean fish, with low lipid and high protein
quality flesh and long shelf-life (Quèmèner, 2002; Poli et al., 2003). Seabass and
seabream have two to five times more fat than meagre, however the profile of fatty
acids are similar to them, characterized by a high proportion of polyunsaturated fatty
acids (PUFAs), especially the n-3 series (among 20.7 and 26.7% in 100 grams of live
weight) (Rodriguez-Rua et al., 2009). In addition, meagre matures at a large size >4
kg (Schuchardt et al., 2007), which is larger than the harvest size, thus avoiding
problems of reduced growth associated with maturation. Although meagre fails to
undergo oocyte maturation spontaneously in confinement, recently developed
hormonal induction methods have proven effective in controlling spawning (Mylonas
et al., 2011; Duncan et al., 2012) and producing eggs of sufficient quality and
quantity for commercial hatchery production. Larvae and juveniles have been reared
with similar facilities and methodologies used for other marine fish species (Pousão-
Ferreira et al., 2013; Soares et al., 2015). This large size fish offer excellent
opportunities for processing such as fillets, loins, slices, etc. all items increasingly
demanded by the European market (Saavedra et al., 2015).
However, this species is generally unknown to fish consumers, apart from some local
areas, where it is landed from capture fisheries, western France, southern Portugal,
southern Spain and Egypt. So producers have to work out the marketing for the
successful introduction of this species on the market. During the last few years
market showed signs of saturation for this species, prices have been low and the
sector exhibited severe signs of crisis (Cardia and Lovatelli, 2007). Though culture of
new species has been suggested as a basic mean to overcome the problem of
Mediterranean aquaculture (Cardia and Lovatelli, 2007), and although meagre was
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
5
one of the most suitable candidate species, this apparently did not yet fulfil
consumers requirements.
The production of meagre is intensive, conducted both in land-based tanks and
cages. Production facilities are few and mainly distributed in southern France
(Camargue, Cannes, and Corsica) and Italy (La Spezia and Orbetello). In land-based
farms production is mainly achieved in circular or rectangular tanks with a water
depth of 1 meter and a volume of 500 m³, usually covered with PVC. Nowadays
meagre is mainly farmed in the sea, using circular or square surface cages of 500-
1000 m³. More recently, submerged cages have also successfully been used; these
2 000 m³ cages are submerged at 10-20 m depth, and an average stocking density
of 10-15/m³ is used (Monfort, 2010).
Commercial feed is supplied by all major aquafeed producers. Meagre feed is similar
to that used for other Mediterranean marine species. An extruded feed with 45-48
percent protein and up to 20-24 percent lipid is used. In land-based farms fish are fed
2 to 3 meals per day and in sea cages a single daily meal is often provided (Monfort,
2010). Little information exists about the dietary nutrient requirements that can be
used for the formulation of specialized diets for this species (Chatzifotis et al., 2012).
Chatzifotis et al. (2010), evaluated the effect of dietary lipid levels on growth and feed
utilization of meagre. Overall, results indicated that the best growth performance was
observed in fish fed with a diet including 17% lipids, whereas the increase of dietary
lipid level from 17% to 21% had a negative effect on growth.
Moedo et al. (2011) indicated that 60% of crude protein was the most suitable protein
level for meagre juveniles. Allied to these results the analysis of the proximal
composition of the whole body revealed that fish fed this diet had lower lipid content
and the highest percentage of protein content.
The mean market price of meagre coming from captured fisheries is between EUR 7-
12/kg and has increased since 1999. Now, the cost of production for meagre is
similar or lower to the cost of production of European seabass and gilthead
seabream, estimated to be approximately 3.9 kg (Monfort, 2010). Thus, from an
economical perspective, meagre still seems to be a promising aquaculture species.
1.4- Fish Nutrition For several years, the main concern in Nutrition studies was to accomplish the
minimal nutrients necessary to achieve good growth in different species of fish (NRC,
2011). However, nowadays, the role of nutrition is much more embracing than
designing fish performance trials, select appropriate diet formulations and feeding
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
6
levels. Nutrition plays an important role in aquatic environments by increasing
nutrient retention as well as in reproduction, fish health and welfare, or the capacity
of fish to respond to stressors and pathogens (Lall et al., 2000). Nutrition combines
efforts of various scientific areas, such as physiology, genetics, pathology, molecular
biology, which can contribute importantly for developing new knowledge in
aquaculture (Hardy, 1999).
The intensification of the production systems and technology was necessary for
aquaculture development. This was essentially a result of the formulation of new
diets that covered all nutritional requirements of the studied species (Allan et al.,
2006). As any other animal producing industry, aquaculture is focused on maximizing
growth rate and minimizing production costs: a rapid growth rate minimizes the time
to achieve the marketable size of the animals while decreasing production costs.
However, despite all technologic advances aquaculture’s future is threatened as far
the production of fishmeal and fish oil remains stagnant. Being highly dependent on
nutrient inputs, aquaculture main challenges for the next years must focus on the
development of new alternative ingredients to feed cultivated species (Lane et al.,
2014).
Important ingredients like fishmeal and fish oil are hugely produced worldwide,
approximately 6 million and 1 million tonnes respectively are produced annually
(figure 3) (Tacon, 2003). Even so, these ingredients cannot sustain the continued
increase in demanding from aquaculture products. Understanding the nutritional
requirements of aquaculture target species and exploring new ingredients and their
capacity to fulfil the needs of the species is imperative (Allan et al., 2006). Fish
growth and overall production are influenced by many factors, with feeding the fish
occupying the first place in the running costs of production. The most expensive
nutrient is protein and therefore, it is necessary that diets be formulated with
optimized quantities of protein that meet but not exceed fish protein needs, for
reducing feed costs (Rahimnejad et al., 2015). In aquaculture, the objective is to
provide species with the quantities of protein necessary to satisfy the requirements of
the fish in essential amino acids for a maximum performance and growth (Chi et al.,
2010). Excess of dietary protein can lead to higher excretion of ammonia by the fish,
as well as making the diets more expensive than needed. As a consequence of
increase levels of ammonia, the water quality gets poorer (Rahimnejad et al., 2015).
Diet efficiency is one of the central issues in fish nutrition and this factor is very
influence by the ratio protein/energy, as well as, the specie or life stage of the fish. If
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
7
the protein is in excess or deficient in a diet, it will either be used as an energy
source or have a negative influence in growth (NRC, 2011)
It has been demonstrated that protein utilization efficiency can be improved by using
lipids and carbohydrates for sparing protein for energy purposes (Moedo et al., 2011;
Cho and Kaushik, 1990; Kaushik and Medale, 1994). In this regard, lipids are a more
efficient source of energy than carbohydrates because lipids are readily metabolized
by fish, especially by carnivorous species (NRC, 2011).
Figure 3: Global production of fishmeal and fish oil. Source: FAO, 2014 1.5- Lipids Lipids are generally described as hydrophobic compounds with high solubility in
organic solvents, and usually containing fatty acids covalently bond to glycerol
molecules or amino groups, forming glycerides in the first case and sphingolipids in
the latter (Tocher, 2003). Lipids include, as major groups, triacylglycerols (TAG), wax
esters, sterols and phospholipids (PL). As for most vertebrates, lipids also constitute
a great source of energy for fish and participate in the growth, reproduction and other
important metabolic functions. They are important constituents of biological
membranes, precursors of many hormones and signaling molecules like eicosanoids
and others. The term 'eicosanoids' is used to denote a group of oxygenated, twenty
carbon fatty acids, and the pathways leading to it are known collectively as the
'arachidonate cascade'. Almost all tissues produce eicosanoids, and they have a
wide range of physiological actions in blood clotting, immune and inflammatory
responses, cardiovascular tone, renal and neural functions, and reproduction
(Schmitz and Ecker, 2008).
Lipids are also a source of essential fatty acids (EFA), like n-3 and n-6
polyunsaturated fatty acids that cannot be synthesized de novo in animal cells and
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
8
must therefore be obtained from the diet (Turchini et al., 2009). In fish diets, n-3
PUFA are mainly provided by fish oils, which contain highly levels of these EFA. Of
all animals currently farmed, fish are the richest source of n-3 PUFA, which has
fundamental implications for human nutrition (Huang et al., 2007).
About 15-30% of fish diets are lipids, and the increase of dietary lipids contributes to
reducing diet costs, by diminishing protein content (Craig and Helfrich, 2009), and
maximizing protein retention and fish performance (Cho and Kaushik, 1990). An
increase of lipids in the diet can however lead to higher body fat deposition
(Chatzifotis et al., 2010; Luo et al., 2005), and induce metabolic alterations, including
fatty liver (Dos Santos et al., 1993), abnormal oxidative status (Rueda-Jasso et al.,
2004), impairment of nutritional value and transformation yield, or affect organoleptic
and physical properties of the fillets (Austreng and Krogdahl, 1987; Gjedrem, 1997;
Hillestad et al. 1998) which may reduce its commercial value (Martino et al., 2002).
So it is fundamental knowing the optimal levels of dietary lipids that promotes
maximum efficiency of fish growth, development and flesh quality (Wang et al.,
2005).
1.6- Fatty acids Fatty acids (FA) are hydrocarbon chains of varying length with one end of the chain
terminated by a methyl group and the other end by a reactive carboxyl group. The
hydrocarbon chain can be saturated or unsaturated. Unsaturated fatty acid contain
double bonds between pairs of adjacent carbon atoms and can be classified
depending on the number of double bonds as monounsaturated (MUFAs), which
contain just one double bond, and polyunsaturated that contain more than one
double bond. FA are the major constituent of triacylglycerides and phospholipids but
can be found either as free molecules, although at small amounts.
Generally, there are only two essential fatty acids. These are linoleic and α-linolenic
acids that can be elongated and desaturated by the animals to the functional FA.
However, marine fish can only met their FA requirements with highly unsaturated
fatty acids (HUFAs) of the n-3 series: eicosapentaenoic (EPA; 20:5(n-3)) and
docosahexaenoic (DHA; 22:6(n-3)), as they lack or have a very low activity of 5-
desaturase, thus preventing the elongation and desaturation of the precursor α-
linolenic acid (figure 4) (Owen et al., 1975; Watanabe, 1982; Sargent et al., 1989).
The spatial conformation of DHA is different from that of EPA as a result of its carbon
backbone length and degree of unsaturation, so EPA has 20 carbon atoms and 5
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
9
double bonds (20:5) and DHA has a longer chain, 22 carbon atoms and 6 double
bonds (22:6) (Gorjão et al., 2009).
Figure 4: The metabolic pathways by which essential fatty acids are converted to longer chain, more unsaturated derivatives. Source: Narayan et al., 2015
These two HUFAs play diverse roles in cells, controlling and regulating growth
performance, survival, stress resistance, cell membrane fluidity, immune function,
nervous system development, vision and pigmentation (Bell et al., 1986)
Recent studies have also shown that n-3 long chain PUFA decrease fat
accumulation, increase fatty acid β-oxidation capacity and modulate the expression
of lipid metabolism-related genes, which are essential for lipid synthesis and play key
roles in the catabolism and storage of fatty acids (Kjær et al., 2008; Todorčević et al.,
2009; Ji et al., 2011).
On the other hand, HUFAs are more susceptible to peroxidation and trigger much
more deleterious effects than other dietary fatty acids do. So, high levels (about 5%
dry weight basis) of dietary HUFAs were reported to cause poor growth, low feed
conversion (Ibeas et al., 2000), impaired mitochondrial function and β-oxidation
activity in grass carp, rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and severe oxidative
stress in Atlantic salmon (Du et al., 2006, 2008; Kjær et al., 2008; Østbye et al.,
2009; Todorčević et al., 2009).
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
10
EPA, DHA and ARA, are precursors for the synthesis of bioactive lipid mediators,
eicosanoids, that include prostaglandins, leukotrienes, lipoxins and thromboxanes.
The principal substrate is arachidonic acid, but both eicosapentaenoic acid and
docosahexaenoic acid are also important substrates (Henderson and Sargent, 1985).
There are three major pathways within the eicosanoid cascade, including the
cyclooxygenase, lipoxygenase, and epoxygenase pathways (figure 5). ARA and EPA
compete for the cyclooxygenases and lipoxygenases that produce, respectively, 2-
series prostanoids and 4-series leukotrienes from ARA, and 3-series prostanoids and
5-series leukotrienes from EPA. Eicosanoids produced from ARA are generally more
biologically active than those produced from EPA and the respective eicosanoids
compete for the same cell membrane receptors. Wherefore ARA produces more
potent inflammatory and pro-aggregatory eicosanoids while EPA has an antagonist
response (Tocher, 2010).
Figure 5: Pathways of conversion of araquidonic acid 20:4 (n-6) and eicosapentaenoic acid 20:5 (n-3) to eicosanoids. Souce: Lall, 2000
Therefore, adequate EPA:ARA ratios are important because one of these EFAs can
regulate the efficacy of the other (Izquierdo and Koven, 2011; Koven et al., 2001).
The EFA requirements of fish vary both qualitatively and quantitatively, and the
optimal level of for marine fish is known to be around 0.5-1% of dry matter for EPA
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
11
and DHA (NRC, 2011).
Thus, several studies have been made to evaluate the ideal proportion of EFA in the
diet. Some studies with larvae of red and gilthead seabream and juvenile striped
jack, demonstrated that including more DHA promoted growth, feed efficiency and
vitality more effectively than EPA (Watanabe et al., 1989; Izquierdo et al., 1989;
Takeuchi et al., 1990; Rodriguez, 1994). Besides, elevated levels of dietary EPA
relative to DHA were shown to have a negative impact on larval neural function,
growth and survival (Copeman et al. 2002).
Given that DHA is naturally found at very high levels in the neural tissue, it is thought
to play a critical role in neural membrane structure and function, including visual
acuity for optimum hunting success (Copeman et al., 2002) and escape swimming
with improved higher burst speed (Benítez-Santana et al., 2014).
In contrast, fresh water fish like rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, that has an
enzymatic system of desaturases and elongases very active are able to
biosynthesize EPA and DHA so diets containing similar levels of EPA or DHA
demonstrated that growth was independent of dietary type of n-3 HUFA; however a
synergistic effect on growth and feed efficiency was observed when these acids were
combined (Takeuchi and Watanabe, 1977). So, it is important to continue studies in
this area to better understand the complex interactions between EFA.
1.7- Phospholipids Berg et al. (2002) refer that the three principal lipids present in the membranes are
phospholipids, glycolipids and cholesterol, being phospholipids the most abundant.
Similarly to other animals, the biomembranes of fish tissues contain
phosphatidylcholine as the major phospholipid followed by
phosphatidylethanolamine, and minor components like phosphatidylserine,
phosphatidylinositol, cardiolipin, and sphingomyelin.
Phospholipids are composed by fatty acids, a group were fatty acids are attached,
usually glycerol, a phosphate, and an alcohol connected to the phosphate. The fatty
acids create a hydrophobic barrier, while the other components of the phospholipids
(the hydrophilic group) are able to keep an interaction with the environment (Berg et
al 2002).
Phospholipids have PUFA preferentially located on the sn-2 position of their glycerol
backbone. Saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids are preferentially located on
the sn-1 position of phospholipids and the sn-1 and sn-3 positions of triacylglycerols.
Fish phospholipids characteristically contain a ratio of n-3/n-6 PUFA of 10-15:1
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
12
(Ackman, 1980).
Tocher et al. (2008) referred the important role of PL in the structure and function of
biomembranes, in digestion and intestinal absorption of different components of the
diet such as long chain fatty acids, proteins, vitamins and minerals. Also, PL
contribute to optimize fish growth and survival, and decrease some deformities in
different ages and types of fish.
The optimization of the quantity of PL in a diet may enhance lipid deposition,
increasing the energy available for growth and ovaries development (Kanazawa et
al., 1985; Teshima et al., 1986; Alava et al., 1993; Cahu et al., 1994; Kontara et al.,
1997; Gong et al., 2000; Gonzalez- Felix et al., 2002). Furthermore, PL may exert
beneficial effects by providing essential nutrients, e.g. essential fatty acids,
phosphorous, choline and inositol (Tocher, 1995; Lall, 2002; Tocher et al., 2008). In
previous studies, King et al. (1992) showed that phospholipids also have an
antioxidant property, as well as feed-attractant properties (Harada, 1987).
It has been suggested that fish at larval stages, are not capable of synthesizing PL at
a sufficient rate to meet the requirements for cell formation and its components
during the initially period of larval growth (Izquierdo and Koven, 2011; Kanazawa,
1993; Geurden et al., 1997a). Due to this suggestion, several fish larvae receive an
abundance of phospholipids in their natural diets, whether from yolk sac lipids or
from natural prey (Tocher et al., 2008).
Recommended requirements for PL ranged from 8% to 12% dry diet in larval fish
(Cahu et al., 2009). Although the PL requirement generally decreases with age or
developmental stage, decrease to around 2 to 4% for juvenile (Tocher et al, 2008).
Requirement for dietary phospholipids has not been established for adult fish. There
is some confusion over whether excessive levels of dietary phospholipids can be
detrimental to fish and crustaceans. Increasing the dietary PL level beyond the
required level did not affect survival or growth in various studies (Conklin et al., 1980;
Kanazawa, 1993; Geurden et al., 1995b).
1.8- Oxidative Stress Generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is an unavoidable consequence in
aerobic organisms. ROS are naturally produced during oxidative metabolism and
include superoxide anions (O2−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radicals (HO·),
and singlet oxygen (1O2) (Livingstone, 2001).
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
13
In normal situations, a balance exists between the production of ROS and antioxidant
processes, but if the balance is not perfect increased levels of oxidative damage can
occur in organisms and increase lipid peroxidation (LPO), protein oxidation, and DNA
damage that can deleteriously affect cell viability by causing membrane damage and
enzyme inactivation (Livingstone, 2001). To maintain homeostasis and prevent
oxidative stress, living organisms have evolved antioxidant defense mechanisms that
include both enzymatic and non-enzymatic components. The main enzymes with
antioxidant activity are: superoxide dismutase (SOD), which catabolizes the
dismutation of superoxide radicals to molecular oxygen and hydrogen peroxide;
catalase (CAT), which degrades hydrogen peroxide into molecular oxygen and
water; and glutathione peroxidase (GPX), which reduces both hydrogen peroxide
and organic peroxides to water and corresponding alcohols, respectively, by a
glutathione-dependent reaction (Storey, 1996; Morales et al., 2004; Pérez-Jiménez
et al., 2009). Other enzymes, such glutathione reductase (GR) and the rate-limiting
enzyme of the pentose phosphate pathway, glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase
(G6PDH), are considered to play a crucial role on the modulation of the activity of the
two H2O2 scavenging pathways of cells (Mourente et al., 2002; Morales et al., 2004).
GR, at the expense of NADPH, regenerates the reduced glutathione (GSH),
substrate for GPX from oxidized glutathione (GSSG); and G6PDH generates the
NADPH that is crucial for the normal functioning of the antioxidant enzymes (CAT,
GPX and GR) (Storey, 1996; Morales et al., 2004).
Several circumstances can interact with the antioxidant defense response in fish.
Factors intrinsic to the fish itself, such as age, phylogenetic position, and feeding
behavior, as well as environmental factors such as the type of diet supplied, daily or
seasonal changes in temperature, dissolved oxygen, toxins present in the water,
pathologies, or parasites, can either fortify or reduce antioxidant defenses (Felton,
1995; Martínez-Álvarez et al., 2005).
PUFA are particularly susceptible to lipid peroxidation (Halliwell and Chirico, 1993),
due to the high number of double bonds. Fish tissues and commercial diets for
cultured fish often contain high levels of PUFA (Stephan, Guillaume and Lamour
1995), and increasing dietary n-3 PUFA can elevate the concentrations of these FA
in fish tissues. Lipid peroxidation can be a major contributor to the loss of cell
function through cellular membrane disruption, by the decrease of membrane fluidity
and activation of calcium-dependent proteases and lipases that lead to an increase
of membrane permeability (Hermes-Lima et al. 1995).
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
14
To determine the oxidative stress levels in fish it is usually measured the antioxidant
enzymes activities and malondialdehyde (MDA) or levels of end-product of lipid
oxidation, such as thiobarbituric reactive species (TBARS) (Tsangaris et al., 2011).
These biomarkers are however non-specific and non-reliable indicators of oxidative
stress (Knight et al., 1988).
Most of the studies on oxidative stress have been conduced mostly in humans and
rodents. Some reports suggested that 1% EPA + DHA in the diet could lead to
oxidative damage in rats, showing higher thiobarbituric acid–reactive substance
levels and reduced superoxide dismutase activity and glutathione levels (Park et al.,
2009). On the other hand, Popović (2013) showed opposite results; after treatment of
aged male rats with fish oil obtained an increase of SOD, CAT activities and
decreased lipid peroxidation
In fish species like juvenile of grass carp, Ctenopharyngodon idellus, SOD activity
increased significantly with increasing dietary HUFA content, which is consistent with
the level of MDA (Ji et al., 2011) and in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) SOD activity
also increased with more dietary EPA and DHA. Dietary PL supplement also
significantly increased SOD activity and reduced the activities of catalase and
glutathione peroxidase in the whole body of Misgurnus anguillicaudatus larvae (Gao
et al., 2014).
1.9- Objectives
As mentioned above, meagre is a species with high potential for aquaculture, but it is
still necessary to improve knowledge on meagre nutrition to enhance fish
performance.
Thus, this study aimed to determine the growth performance and body composition
of meagre fed four diets with different proportions of phospholipids and DHA.
Moreover, the effect of the dietary treatments on fatty acid and lipid class
composition of the muscle, liver and brain was also evaluated, as well as dietary
effects on hepatic oxidative damage and antioxidant mechanisms.
The overall objective of this study was to address two key issues: if the increase of
phospholipids promotes growth performance and if increased levels of DHA in the
diet promotes increased deposition of DHA in muscle.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
15
2- Material and methods
2.1- Diets
Four experimental diets (A, B, C and D) were formulated to contain two different
proportions of DHA (1.0 and 2.0%) and phospholipids (1.0 and 4.0%). The
percentage of protein, lipids and starch were constant in all diets.
The variation in the content of phospholipids was achieved by altering the
concentration of lecithin in the diet, and the variation of the DHA was made by
changing the concentration of tuna and fish oil. The experimental diets used in this
work were formulated by SPAROS Lda. (Olhão, Portugal).
All ingredients and theoretical composition of the different diets are presented in
table 1. Additionally, analyzed concentration of lipids and lipid composition are shown
in table 2.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
16
Table 1: Formulation and proximal chemical composition of the experimental diets.
Ingredients A B C D % % % % Fishmeal 70 LT 15,000 15,000 15,000 15,000 Fish protein concentrate 5,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 Squid meal 7,000 7,000 7,000 7,000 Krill meal 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Feathermeal hydrolisate 4,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 Porcine blood meal 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 Poultry meal 65 9,500 9,500 9,500 9,500 Soy protein concentrate 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Wheat Gluten 10,500 10,500 10,500 10,500 Corn gluten 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 Gelatinized pea starch 6,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 Fish oil 6,800 0,000 4,700 1,000 Tuna oil 1,800 10,600 0,000 2,500 Algatrium DHA70 0,000 0,000 0,400 1,600 Krill oil 0,000 0,000 2,500 2,500 Soybean oil 2,000 0,000 0,000 0,000 Soy lecithin 0,000 0,000 3,000 3,000 Vitamin & Mineral Premix 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 Binder 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 Antioxidants & Preservative 0,500 0,500 0,500 0,500 MCP 1,500 1,500 1,500 1,500 Total 100,000 100,000 100,000 100,000 Theoretical (as fed basis) A B C D Crude protein 56,4 56,4 56,4 56,4 Crude fat 16,5 16,5 16,4 16,4 Fiber 0,6 0,6 0,6 0,6 Starch 3,6 3,6 3,6 3,6 Ash 6,0 6,0 6,0 6,0 Gross Energy 19,1 19,1 19,0 19,0 Lysine 2,9 2,9 2,9 2,9 Methionine + Cystine 1,8 1,8 1,8 1,8 Total Phosphorus 1,0 1,0 1,0 1,0 Calcium 1,1 1,1 1,1 1,1 Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) 1,0 1,0 1,1 1,1 Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) 1,0 2,0 1,0 2,1 Total Phospholipids (PL) 1,0 1,0 4,0 4,0
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
17
2.2- Experimental conditions
This experiment was conducted for 8 weeks, beginning on September 15th until
November 13th, in the facilities of Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera (IPMA),
Estação Piloto de Piscicultura de Olhão (EPPO), Portugal with juveniles of meagre
Argyrosomus regius bred in captivity at IPMA.
A total of 1800 juveniles from the same cohort were randomly assigned to 12
fiberglass tanks (150 juveniles per tank) with 1500 liters of capacity. An open
circulation system was established with water previously filtered and pumped from
Ria Formosa.
Diets were tested in triplicate tanks with fish sorted manually to have an initial weight
of 13.8± 2.0g. Previously to the start of the trial fish were acclimatized for 2 weeks in
order to adapt to the experimental conditions.
During the experiment photoperiod was maintained at 14 hours light: 10h dark,
dissolved oxygen between 3 to 6 mg/l, salinity ranged from 34 to 36 psu and water
temperature between 19 to 24ºC. A heater assured that water temperature did not
decrease from 19ºC to assure that fish ingestion were adequate.
Tanks maintenance was done daily, and included the monitoring of water
temperature and dissolved oxygen. Regularly, the flow rate of each tank was also
verified to maintain a water renovation rate of 60% per hour.
The meagre were fed by hand, 3 times a day, to apparent satiety at 9h, 13h and 17h,
seven days a week.
2.3- Sampling
During the trial fish were sampled at 3 times: at the start of the experiment, at the fifth
week, and the end of the experiment.
In the first sampling, 31 fish from the stock population were weighed, measured and
any deformations registered. Six of these fish were frozen for proximal analysis of the
carcass. Samples of muscle, brain and liver from another six fish, were collected for
fatty acid and lipid class determination. Liver weight was also measured to calculate
the hepatosomatic index.
In the second sampling, 31 fish from each tank were measured and weighed and any
deformations registered. The remaining fish of each tank were weighed in groups of
10 fish.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
18
At the end of the trial, all fish from each tank were weighed, measured and any
deformations registered. Six fish from each tank were immediately frozen for whole
body composition analysis. Two pools of four other fish per thank were sampled for
liver, brain and muscle tissues for lipid class and fatty acid analysis. A portion of liver
was also used for oxidative stress analysis. All livers were weighted for determination
of the hepatosomatic index.
Before sampling fish were starved (for 4h) and lightly anaesthetised (ethylene glycol
monophenyl ether, 0.3 ml l-1). Immediately after collection, all tissue samples were
placed in liquid nitrogen and then frozen at -80ºC until analysed.
2.4- Analytical Methods
2.4.1- Zootechnical parameters
All data referring to the growth performance, nutrient retention and physiological
status of meagre were evaluated based on the following formulas:
• Specific growth rate (SGR): 100 × (ln FBW- ln IBW))/ Nº of days
• Feed conversion rate (FCR): Total dry feed intake (g)/ Wet weight gain (g)
• Voluntary feed intake (VFI): (Total dry feed intake (g)/ ((Initial biomass (g) +
Final biomass (g))/2) × 100)/ Nº of days)
• Protein efficiency rate (PER): Wet weight gain (g)/ Protein intake (g)
• Nutrient Retention (% nutrient intake): Total dry nutrient gain (g)/ Total dry
nutrient intake (g)
• Energy Retention (% intake): Total energy gain (kJ)/ Total energy intake (kJ)
• Hepatosomatic index (HSI): (Liver wet weight (g)/ whole-body wet weight (g))
× 100
• Condition factor (K): (Body weight (g)/ Total body length (cm)) × 1000)
2.4.2- Proximate analysis
Frozen fish carcasses were transferred to the facilities of Faculdade de Ciências da
Universidade do Porto (FCUP) for analysis. All proximal analyses were performed in
duplicate.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
19
Before analyses, fish were dried at 70 ºC and then ground and stored until posterior
analysis. Dry matter (DM) was determined by drying the samples at 105°C until
constant weight; ash by incineration in a muffle furnace at 450 °C for 16 h; protein
content (N×6.25) by the Kjeldahl method after acid digestion using Kjeltec digestion
and distillation units (Tecator Systems, Höganäs, Sweden; model 1015 and 1026,
respectively); lipid by petroleum ether extraction (Soxtec HT System) and gross
energy by direct combustion in an adiabatic bomb calorimeter (PARR Instruments,
Moline, IL, USA; PARR model 1261).
2.4.3- Tissue lipids
The samples were frozen in dry ice and carried out to the IPMA facilities at Lisboa for
analyses. Samples were freeze-dried and then grinded. Two pools of each sample
tissue were obtained and analysed in triplicate.
2.4.3.1- Lipid classes
Total lipids were extracted from 1 g of the hogenized tissue, using chloroform:
methanol (2:1 v:v), according to Folch et al. (1957). Solvent was evaporated under
nitrogen flushing to quantify the total lipids extracted from the samples. Lipids were
re-dissolved at a concentration of 10 mg/ml of chloroform for determining lipid class
composition.
The lipid classes were classified through thin-layer chromatography (TLC) by the
method of Olsen and Henderson (1989). Total lipid samples (10 µl) were applied in
20×20 cm TLC silica gel plates (VWR, Lutterworth, UK) and running in a solvent
mixture comprising n-hexane, diethyl ether and formic acid (50:50:2, by vol.). Excess
solvent was evaporated via air drying and vacuum desiccation. Lipid classes were
visualised by spraying with solution of phosphomolybdic acid (10%) in ethanol and
charring plates at 160ºC for 20min. The relative percentage of the lipid classes were
quantified by densitometry (GS-800 Calibrated Densitometer) with a software
program from Quantity One 4.5.2 (PDI).
2.4.3.2- Fatty-acids
The fatty acid profile was determined according to Lepage and Roy (1986) modified
by Cohen et al. (1988). This method consists in the transesterification, in acidic
medium, of fatty acid methyl esters (FAME). The fatty acids were transesterified
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
20
using a mixture of acetylchloride and methanol (1:19, v/v) and 10 mg/ml of
tricosanoic acid (23:0), as internal standard. FAME were analyse throw injection of 2
µl into a gas chromatograph (GC; Varian Star CP-3800) equipped with an auto
sampler and a flame ionization detector (FID) at 250ºC. The separation was
performed in a polyethylene glycol capillary column DB-wax (0.25 mm internal
diameter 30 m polar capillary precolumn × 0.25 µM layer thickness) and helium as
carrier gas. Helium was used as carrier gas at a flow rate of 1 mL min-1, to perform
the separation in a capillary column DB-Wax (30 m length × 0.32 mm internal
diameter; 0.25 µm film thickness; Hewlett Packard, Albertville, MN, USA)
programmed at 180 ºC for 5 min, raised to 220 ºC at 4 ºC min-1, and maintained at
220 ºC for 25 min, with the detector and the split injector (100:1) at 250 ºC. FAME
identification was carried out by comparing their retention time with those of Sigma
standards. The quantification of the different fatty acids as a function of its peak area,
and the peak area of internal standard (23: 0) of the heavy mass of the sample and
the total area of fatty acid in the sampleusing Varian software . Fatty acids present
in the sample were identified by comparing the retention time obtained for each one
and that of the standard pattern Sigma-Aldrich (Supelco Analytical). The accuracy of
this methodology was assessed by testing certified reference materials in the same
conditions as the samples, and the results obtained in this study showed to be in
agreement with the certified values.
2.4.4- Oxidative stress
In order to have representative liver samples to perform the enzymatic analysis, 2
pools of 4 livers each per tank were used. Each liver pool was homogenized (dilution
1:4) in ice-cold buffer (100 mM Tris-HCl, 0.1 mM EDTA and 0.1% triton X-100 (v/v),
pH 7.8). All procedures were performed on ice. Homogenates were centrifuged at
30.000g for 30 min at 4°C. After centrifugation, the resultant supernatants were
collected and aliquots were stored at −80°C until analysis.
All antioxidant enzyme assays were carried out at 25°C. The enzymatic reactions
were started by addition of the tissue extract, except for SOD were xanthine oxidase
was used. The specific assay conditions were as follows:
• SOD
Superoxide dismutase (SOD; EC 1.15.1.1) activity was measured
spectrophotochemically at 550 nm by the ferricytochrome c method using
xanthine/xanthine oxidase as the source of superoxide radicals (McCord and
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
21
Fridovich, 1969). The reaction mixture consisted of 50mM potassium
phosphate buffer (pH 7.8), 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM xanthine, 0.012 mM
cytochrome C, and 0.025 IU mL−1 xanthine oxidase. Activity was reported as
units per mg of protein. One unit of activity was defined as the amount of
enzyme necessary to produce a 50% inhibition of the ferricytochrome C
reduction rate.
• CAT
Catalase (CAT; EC 1.11.1.6) activity was determined according to the method
of Aebi (1984) by measuring the decrease of hydrogen peroxide
concentration at 240 nm. The reaction mixture contained 50 mM potassium
phosphate buffer (pH 7) and 10 mM H2O2 freshly added.
• GPX
Glutathione peroxidase (GPX; EC 1.11.1.9) activity was assayed as
described by Flohé and Günzler (1984). The glutathione disulfide (GSSG)
generated by GPX was reduced by glutationa redutase (GR), and NADPH
consumption rate was monitored spectrophomotetrically at 340 nm. The
reaction mixture consisted of 50 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.1), 1
mM EDTA, 3.9 mM GSH (reduced glutathione), 3.9 mM sodium azide, 1 IU
mL−1 glutathione reductase, 0.2 mM NADPH and 0.05 mM H2O2.
• Lipid Peroxidation:
The concentration of thiobarbituric acid reacting substances (TBARS) was
determined as a marker of lipid peroxidation (LPO) following the methodology
described by Buege and Aust (1978). An aliquot of the supernatant from the
homogenate (100 µL) was mixed with 500 µL of a previously prepared
solution containing 15% (w/v) trichloroacetic acid (TCA), 0.375% (w/v)
thiobarbituric acid (TBA), 80% (v/v) hydrochloric acid 0.25 N and 0.01% (w/v)
butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT). The mixture was heated to 100 °C for 15
min. Then, after being cooled at room temperature and centrifuged at 1.500 g
for 10 min, supernatant was removed and absorbance measured at 535 nm.
Concentration was expressed as nanomoles malondialdehyde (MDA) per
gram of tissue, calculated from a calibration curve.
• G6PDH
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
22
Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH; EC 1.1.1.49) activity was
assayed as previously described by Morales et al. (1990), using a reaction
mixture containing 50 mM imidazole–HCl buffer (pH 7.4), 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM
NADP and 1 mM glucose-6-phosphate.
• GR
Glutathione reductase (GR; EC 1.6.4.2) activity was determined
spectrophotometrically at 340 nm by measuring the oxidation of NADPH as
described by Morales et al. (2004). The reaction mixture consisted of 0.1 M
sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5), 1 mM EDTA, 0.63 mM NADPH, and 0.16
mM GSSG.
Except for SOD, which units of expression were already described, all enzyme
activities were expressed as units (CAT) or milliunits (GK, HK, PK, FBPase, 21 GDH,
ASAT, ALAT, G6PDH, ME, FAS, GPX and GR) per milligram of hepatic soluble
protein (specific activity).
Protein concentration was determined according to Bradford (1976) using Sigma
protein assay kit and bovine serum albumin as standard. One unit of enzyme activity
was defined as the amount of enzyme required to transform 1 µmol of substrate per
minute under the above assay conditions.
2.5- Statistical analysis Data are expressed as mean ± standard error of the mean (S.E), and all data
analysis was done with the software used SPSS 19.0. Levene and Shapiro-Wilk tests
were performed before analysis to verify whether the data were homogeneous and
were normally distributed, respectively. When values were significant, data was
transformed using ln, √x or arcsin square root . Statistical evaluation of growth trial,
lipid composition and oxidative stress data was done by two-way analysis of variance
(ANOVA). The significance level of 0.05 was used for rejection of the null hypothesis.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
23
3- Results
3.1- Diet composition Table 2 presents the fatty acids composition of different diets. All diets had relatively
similar amounts of total SFA, MUFA and PUFA, although diet A had a slightly higher
level of MUFA than diet D (32.2 and 26.8% respectively DW) and the amount of
PUFA was higher in D diet (37.2% DW) than in the other diets.
Lipid classes of the four diets are presented in table 3. TAG is the highest proportion
in all diet, despite its percentage being lower in diets C (63.2% DW) and D (59.8%
DW) than in the other diets. This is due to the diets supplementation with 4.0% PL as
well as the high among of DAG (table 3).
Table 2: Fatty acid composition of the different experimental diets (results in % and mg/g fatty acid)
Fat acid (%) Diet A Diet B Diet C Diet D
Fat acid (mg/g) Diet A Diet B Diet C Diet D
14:00 6.9±0.7 6.1±1.8 7.4±0.2 6.3±0.5
14:00 11.6±2.7 10.2±5.5 12.6±0.4 11.0±1.8
16:00 20.6±0.9 23.5±3.8
22.5±0.1 22.7±0.5
16:00
34.8±6.4 38.8±15.9 38.1±0.5 39.4±3.9
18:00 3.1±0.0 4.2±0.1 2.8±0.0 3.1±0.1
18:00 5.1±0.7 6.8±1.5 4.8±0.0 5.4±0.3
Σ SFA 32.5±1.8 36.7±6.4 34.2±0.
5 34.0±1.3
Σ SFA
54.8±10.5 60.7±24.8 57.9±1.2 59.0±6.5
16:1(n9+n7) 6.5±0.3 6.5±1.2 6.0±0.1 5.3±0.2
16:1(n9+n7) 10.9±2.1 10.8±4.6 10.2±0.2 9.2±1.0
18:1(n9+n7+n5) 17.7±0.2 19.2±0.3
17.4±0.1 17.8±0.2
18:1(n9+n7+n5
29.8±4.2 31.1±7.5 29.5±0.0 30.8±2.0
20:1(n9+n7) 4.0±0.3 1.8±0.4 3.5±0.0 1.9±0.0
20:1(n9+n7) 6.6±0.4 2.8±0.1 6.0±0.0 3.3±0.2
Σ Mufa 32.2±1.2 28.9±2.4
30.7±0.2 26.8±0.5
Σ Mufa
54.1±7.0 46.9±12.8 52.0±0.3 46.5±3.4
18:2n6 14.5±0.2 7.9±0.2
14.4±0.1 14.3±0.2
18:2n6
24.3±3.2 12.9±3.5 24.3±0.1 24.8±1.6
18:3n3 LNA 1.8±0.0 1.0±0.0 1.7±0.0 1.6±0.0
18:3n3 LNA 3.0±0.4 1.6±0.4 2.9±0.1 2.8±0.2
20:4n6 ARA 0.6±0.0 1.3±0.2 0.4±0.0 0.6±0.0
20:4n6 AA 1.0±0.1 2.1±0.2 0.7±0.1 1.1±0.1
20:5n3 EPA 5.3±0.3 5.1±0.8 5.8±0.1 5.6±0.2
20:5n3 EPA 8.9±0.7 8.1±0.8 9.9±0.1 9.6±0.4
22:6n3 DHA 5.8±0.7 12.4±4.2 5.6±0.0 10.4±0.4
22:6n3 DHA 9.6±0.3 19.2±1.7 9.5±0.1 18.0±0.8
Σ Pufa 33.4±1.4 32.6±6.5 33.1±0.
4 37.2±1.0
Σ Pufa
56.3±5.9 52.1±8.7 56.6±0.7 65.3±3.6
DHA/EPA 1.1±1.9 2.4±5.0 1.0±0.0 1.9±1.8
DHA/EPA 1.1±0.4 2.4±2.2 1.0±0.4 1.9±1.9
EPA/ARA 8.8±30.4 3.9±4.4
13.3±3.3
9.1±107.6
AA
8.8±5.5 3.9±3.3 13.3±2.5 9.1±5.1
DHA/LNA 3.2±34.0
12.5±149.7 3.3±0.0 6.5±20.7
DHA/LNA
3.2±0.6 12.0±4.6 3.3±0.6 6.5±3.2
Σ n3 PUFA 16.4±1.1 20.5±5.5
16.7±0.2 20.9±0.7
Σ n3 PUFA
27.8±2.1 32.6±3.5 28.8±0.4 37.1±1.8
Σ n6 PUFA 15.5±0.2 10.2±0.8
15.0±0.2 15.3±0.3
Σ n6 PUFA
26.0±3.3 16.4±4.1 25.4±0.2 26.6±1.7
Ratio n3/n6 1.1±5.4 2.0±7.1 1.1±1.0 1.4±2.8
Ratio n3/n6 1.1±0.6 2.0±0.9 1.1±2.7 1.4±1.0
Σ(Sfa+Mufa+Pufa)
98.4±0.0 98.5±0.2
98.3±0.2 98.5±0.0
Σ(Sfa+Mufa+Pufa)
165.3±23.3
159.6±40.3
166.6±1.3
170.8±13.2
SFA, Saturated Fatty Acids; MUFA, Monounsaturated Fatty Acids; LNA, α-Linolenic acid; ARA, Arachidonic Acid; EPA, Eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, Docosahexaenoic acid; PUFA, Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
24
Table 3: Lipid class of different experimental diets (results in %)
Diet
Lipid Class (%) A B C D
TAG 73.9±1.2 70.6±1.5 63.2±1.5 59.8±3.0
FFA 16.0±0.1 16.8±0.8 18.2±1.0 23.4±1.5
CH 3.4±0.6 4.2±0.6 5.7±1.1 4.2±0.8
DAG 3.7±0.6 4.7±0.9 8.4±0.8 8.0±0.7
MAG 0.8±0.1 1.0±0.2 1.6±0.2 1.7±0.4
PL 2.2±0.0 2.6±0.3 2.9±0.2 2.9±0.4
Mean values and standard error of the mean (±SE) are presented for each parameter (n=3); TAG, Triacylglycerols; FFA, Free fatty acids; CH, Cholesterol; DAG, Diacylglycerol; MAG, Monoacylglycerol; PL, Phospholipids.
3.2- Growth trial Mortality during this experiment was low and it was not affected by diets (Table 4).
The main cause of death was associated to fish jumping out of the tanks.
Average body weight of the fish increased more than fourfold the original weight,
from an initial average body weight of 18.2±2.7g to an average body weight of
96.9±15.6g at the end of the experiment.
Final weight and specific growth rate were significantly affected (P<0.05) by dietary
treatments (Table 4). Final body weight was higher in fish fed the diets with more
phospholipids. In fish fed the diets with higher PL levels, growth further improved with
the increase of dietary DHA. Specific growth rate was higher in fish fed the PL
supplemented diets, but DHA supplementation did not affect SGR. Nevertheless, a
significant interaction between DHA and PL was noticed, due to the higher SGR in
fish fed the diet fortified with PL and the higher DHA level.
There were no differences between groups on voluntary feed intake, however, feed
conversion ratio was affect by dietary phospholipids, with lower FCR being observed
with the diets supplemented with higher amounts of phospholipids. Dietary levels of
DHA did not affect FCR.
The condition factor increased with the increase of dietary phospholipids and the
hepatossomatic index was slightly lower with diet including lower PL and higher DHA
content (Table 4).
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
25
Table 4: Growth performance, feed utilization, condition and hepatic indices of Argyrosomus regius fed the experimental diet.
Treatment
Analysis of variance
A B C D PL DHA
PL x DHA
Inicial body weight (g) 18.2±2.7 - - - Week 5 body weight (g) 60.2±9.8 60.8±10.4 67.7±12.0 69.4±13.9 * ns ns Final body weight (g) 84.4±0.4 83.2±1.7 105.8±1.1 114.3±1.7 * * *
VFI 2.9±0.2 2.9±0.2 2.4±0.0 2.7±0.6 n.s n.s n.s
SGR 2.7±0.0 2.7±0.0 3.1±0.0 3.2±0.1 * n.s *
FCR 1.3±0.2 1.3±0.1 1.0±0.0 1.1±0.2 * n.s n.s
Mortality (%) 2.0±1.3 2.7±3.1 1.8±1.0 2.0±2.0 n.s n.s n.s
Inicial HSI 2.1±0.3 - - - Final HSI 2.2±0.1 1.8±0.0 2.2±0.0 2.2±0.2 * * *
Inicial CF 11.3±1.0 - - - Final CF 11.5±0.1 11.3±0.5 11.8±0.1 11.8±0.3 * ns *
Mean values and standard error of the mean (±SE) are presented for each parameter (n=3). In the right moiety of the table, results from two way ANOVA are reflected; asterisks indicate significant differences as *P<0.05; n.s. indicates non significant differences.
3.3- Whole-body composition Regarding carcass composition, only protein showed no differences among
treatments at the end of the trial (Table 5).
The dry matter content of the carcasses increased considerably with an increase of
PL in the diet.
Increase of the PL content in the diets, promoted an increase of the whole-body
lipids, which was higher in fish fed the diet with higher level of DHA.
Carcass energy content was not affected by dietary PL or DHA, although a
significant interaction between them was detectable, showing that dietary 4.0% PL
and 2.0% DHA promote higher energy content.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
26
Table 5: Whole-body composition (% dry matter) of Argyrosomus regius fed the experimental diet.
Treatment
Analysis of variance
Inicial A B C D PL DHA
PL x DHA
Dry matter (%) 14.0±0.5 23.2±2.7 22.6±4.2 26.2±2.8 31.4±5.5 * n.s n.s Ash (%) 14.6±0.9 11.7±1.6 14.2±2.7 12.5±2.2 10.9±1.5 n.s n.s * Protein (%) 69.3±2.5 72.1±2.5 74.2±5.4 72.3±6.0 72.8±6.8 n.s n.s n.s Lipids (%) 16,4±0,1 18.4±2.0 14.6±3.6 21.3±5,2 30.9±5.7 * n.s * Energy (KJ/g) 26.4±0.1 33.4±1.8 31.1±1.1 31.8±1.2 35.4±1.6 n.s n.s *
Mean values and standard error of the mean (±SE) are presented for each parameter (n=3). In the right moiety of the table, results from two way ANOVA are reflected; asterisks indicate significant differences as *P<0.05; n.s. indicates non significant differences.
3.4- Lipid composition The fatty acid profile of meagre fed the four diets is shown in tables 6 and 9 for liver,
tables 7 and 10 for brain, and tables 8 and 11 for muscle.
The fatty acid profile was similar to that of the diets in all organs, with special focus to
the brain, that not being a lipid accumulation organ kept a very constant composition.
The brain was the organ that showed the highest levels of DHA (both in % and in
mg/g).
In general, fish fed the diets with higher DHA content (mg/g) had higher deposition of
this fatty acid in all organs. However, high supplementation of PL in the diet led to a
decrease of DHA in the liver.
The concentration of EPA in the tissues (mg/g) was always lower than that of the
diets. An increase of PL in the diet increased EPA retention in the muscle, while in
the liver the deposition of EPA was higher in fish fed diets containing 2.0% of DHA,
but only at the lower dietary PL level.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
27
Table 6: Liver fatty acid composition (mg/g fatty acids) of Argyrosomus regius fed the experimental diets.
Liver:
Treatment
Analysis of variance
Fat acid (mg/g) Initial A B C D PL DHA PL x DHA
14:00 22.5±1.6 18.1±4.7 12.8±1.7 16.9±1.8 12.4±1.0 n.s * n.s
16:00 102.2±9.7 93.2±14.1 83.1±4.9 92.2±7.5 86.9±2.3 n.s * n.s
18:00 21.5±2.4 23.5±1.6 20.1±0.4 25.8±2.4 26.0±0.2 * n.s *
Σ SFA 156.6±14.7 143.0±21.9 126.4±9.1 141.9±12.4 138.8±15.5 n.s n.s n.s
16:1(n9+n7) 53.4±3.5 37.7±7.9 32.6±2.4 32.4±3.1 27.8±1.0 * * n.s
18:1(n9+n7+n5) 74.1±4.7 97.7±10.5 87.9±3.2 89.6±5.1 88.3±0.8 n.s * n.s
20:1(n9+n7) 4.6±0.2 18.1±1.1 7.3±1.7 13.8±0.2 10.1±2.9 n.s * *
Σ Mufa 137.9±8.9 155.9±19.8 129.9±7.5 138.0±8.7 128.3±4.7 * * n.s
18:2n6 25.0±1.4 60.8±10.0 35.4±1.7 51.6±1.9 44.4±10.4 n.s * *
18:3n3 LNA 6.8±0.3 6.4±1.0 3.8±0.2 5.4±0.2 4.8±0.2 n.s * *
20:4n6 ARA 3.8±0.1 2.3±0.2 5.3±0.3 1.8±0.4 2.2±0.4 * * *
20:5n3 EPA 36.7±1.0 15.5±1.4 17.5±1.1 16.7±0.3 16.6±0.1 n.s * *
22:6n3 DHA 38.0±1.7 26.8±2.3 57.7±6.1 26.9±0.8 38.6±2.4 * * *
Σ Pufa 138.4±6.5 135.4±18.1 145.7±11.5 124.9±4.7 130.1±16.4 * * n.s
DHA/EPA 1.0±1.7 1.7±1.6 3.3±5.4 1.6±3.0 2.3±28.0 * * *
EPA/ARA 9.7±13.3 6.7±8.8 3.3±3.6 9.3±0.6 7.7±0.2 n.s n.s n.s
DHA/LNA 5.6±5.4 4.2±2.3 15.2±32.5 5.0±4.0 8.1±10.4 * * *
Σ n3 PUFA 100.1±4.0 61.4±6.4 89.5±8.4 62.5±1.6 73.7±4.2 * * *
Σ n6 PUFA 32.7±1.7 66.4±10.4 46.2±2.6 d 55.5±2.6 49.1±11.2 * * *
Ratio n3/n6 3.1±2.4 0.9±0.6 1.9±3.3 1.1±0.6 1.5±0.4 * * n.s
Σ (Sfa+Mufa+Pufa) 432.9±19.3 434.4±59.7 402.0±28.1 404.8±25.8 397.1±36.7 n.s n.s n.s
Mean values and standard error of the mean (±SE) are presented for each parameter (n=3). In the right moiety of the table, results from two way ANOVA are reflected; asterisks indicate significant differences as *P<0.05; n.s. indicates non significant differences; SFA, Saturated Fatty Acids; MUFA, Monounsaturated Fatty Acids; LNA, α-Linolenic acid; ARA, Arachidonic Acid; EPA, Eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, Docosahexaenoic acid; PUFA, Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
28
Table 7: Brain fatty acid composition (mg/g fatty acids) of Argyrosomus regius fed the experimental diets.
Brain:
Treatment
Analysis of variance
Fat acid (mg/g) Initial A B C D PL DHA PL x DHA
14:00 0.9±0.4 2.4±0.5 1.7±0.6 2.1±0.4 2.0±0.2 n.s * n.s
16:00 37.2±9.8 55.4±2.3 52.2±2.3 51.6±5.4 53.6±1.6 n.s n.s n.s
18:00 26.6±2.5 30.8±0.4 30.8±0.8 30.1±1.8 31.3±0.8 n.s n.s n.s
Σ SFA 68.0±13.4 91.8±3.5 88.2±4.0 86.5±7.8 89.6±2.8 n.s n.s n.s
16:1(n9+n7) 4.7±1.4 10.6±0.7 9.4±0.8 9.1±1.2 9.2±0.4 n.s n.s n.s
18:1(n9+n7+n5) 39.6±6.2 65.2±3.2 63.9±3.5 61.6±6.0 63.6±2.7 n.s n.s n.s
20:1(n9+n7) 1.2±0.2 5.0±0.6 3.4±0.2 3.7±0.2 3.4±0.3 * * *
Σ Mufa 51.2±9.0 82.8±4.9 78.4±4.7 76.2±7.7 77.9±3.8 n.s n.s n.s
18:2n6 2.7±1.0 13.4±2.3 8.5±1.2 9.5±1.1 9.4±0.7 * * *
18:3n3 LNA 0.6±0.5 1.1±0.2 0.7±0.1 0.7±0.1 0.7±0.1 * * *
20:4n6 ARA 3.0±0.3 4.2±0.1 5.1±0.0 3.8±0.1 4.0±0.1 * * *
20:5n3 EPA 7.8±0.3 9.9±0.5 8.8±0.5 10.0±0.7 9.9±0.1 n.s n.s n.s
22:6n3 DHA 40.9±5.0 48.7±1.7 51.8±1.3 50.9±1.4 51.5±1.1 n.s n.s n.s
Σ Pufa 70.4±9.6 101.4±7.3 100.7±4.9 99.7±6.0 100.5±3.3 n.s n.s n.s
DHA/EPA 5.3±14.8 4.9±3.1 5.9±2.8 5.1±2.0 5.2±21.1 n.s * n.s
EPA/ARA 2.6±1.1 2.3±6.2 1.7±22.5 2.6±11.0 2.5±0.4 * * *
DHA/LNA 67.8±10.7 45.1±7.1 75.5±10.8 71.8±15.9 75.3±15.9 * * *
Σ n3 PUFA 63.1±7.7 79.6±4.0 81.9±3.2 83.2±4.2 83.9±1.8 * n.s n.s
Σ n6 PUFA 6.9±1.6 18.8±2.9 15.4±1.5 14.2±1.6 14.2±1.3 * * *
Ratio n3/n6 9.1±4.7 4.2±1.4 5.3±2.1 5.9±2.6 5.9±1.4 * * n.s
Σ (Sfa+Mufa+Pufa) 189.6±19.5 276.0±6.8 267.2±8.9 262.5±16.4 268.0±4.9 n.s n.s n.s
Mean values and standard error of the mean (±SE) are presented for each parameter (n=3). In the right moiety of the table, results from two way ANOVA are reflected; asterisks indicate significant differences as *P<0.05; n.s. indicates non significant differences; SFA, Saturated Fatty Acids; MUFA, Monounsaturated Fatty Acids; LNA, α-Linolenic acid; ARA, Arachidonic Acid; EPA, Eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, Docosahexaenoic acid; PUFA, Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
29
Table 8: Muscle fatty acid composition (mg/g fatty acids) of Argyrosomus regius fed the experimental diets.
Muscle:
Treatment
Analysis of variance
Fat acid (mg/g) Initial A B C D PL DHA PL x DHA
14:00 1.0±0.2 1.8±0.4 1.4±0.3 1.7±0.3 2.6±1.1 n.s n.s *
16:00 7.1±1.3 12.9±1.8 11.7±1.1 12.3±1.4 16.0±4.5 n.s n.s n.s
18:00 2.1±0.3 3.7±0.2 3.6±0.1 3.3±0.3 3.8±0.7 n.s n.s n.s
Σ SFA 10.9±1.8 19.4±2.7 17.8±1.7 18.2±2.0 23.4±6.6 n.s n.s n.s
16:1(n9+n7) 1.7±0.3 2.9±0.6 2.5±0.3 2.5±0.4 3.3±1.2 n.s n.s n.s
18:1(n9+n7+n5) 5.4±0.7 12.0±1.0 10.7±0.3 11.0±1.2 13.4±3.3 n.s n.s n.s
20:1(n9+n7) 0.5±0.0 2.9±1.1 1.0±0.1 1.9±0.1 1.8±0.3 n.s * *
Σ Mufa 8.1±1.1 18.2±2.7 14.5±0.7 15.6±1.7 18.9±4.9 n.s n.s *
18:2n6 1.7±0.2 7.3±0.7 4.0±0.1 7.1±0.7 8.6±2.1 * n.s *
18:3n3 LNA 0.4±0.0 0.7±0.1 0.4±0.1 0.7±0.1 0.8±0.2 * n.s *
20:4n6 ARA 0.6±0.1 0.8±0.1 1.1±0.0 0.6±0.0 0.7±0.1 * * *
20:5n3 EPA 4.5±0.3 3.5±0.3 2.9±0.0 3.7±0.3 4.1±0.8 * n.s n.s
22:6n3 DHA 7.4±0.3 8.5±0.7 10.5±0.5 8.1±0.3 10.5±1.4 n.s * n.s
Σ Pufa 17.0±1.2 23.6±2.4 21.8±1.0 23.2±1.8 28.5±5.5 * n.s *
DHA/EPA 1.7±1.0 2.5±2.7 3.6±10.9 2.2±1.0 2.5±1.7 * * *
EPA/ARA 7.3±6.9 4.4±2.4 2.8±1.1 6.5±11.9 6.3±9.3 * * *
DHA/LNA 16.9±7.6 12.1±6.1 27.4±7.2 11.9±3.5 12.5±6.0 n.s n.s n.s
Σ n3 PUFA 13.9±0.9 14.4±1.4 15.2±0.7 14.6±0.9 18.1±3.0 n.s * n.s
Σ n6 PUFA 2.8±0.3 8.4±0.9 5.6±0.2 7.8±0.8 9.5±2.3 * * *
Ratio n3/n6 5.0±2.9 1.7±1.4 2.7±3.7 1.9±1.1 1.9±1.3 * * * Σ (Sfa+Mufa+Pufa) 36.0±3.7 61.2±7.9 54.1±3.3 57.0±5.6 70.7±17.0 n.s n.s n.s
Mean values and standard error of the mean (±SE) are presented for each parameter (n=3). In the right moiety of the table, results from two way ANOVA are reflected; asterisks indicate significant differences as *P<0.05; n.s. indicates non significant differences; SFA, Saturated Fatty Acids; MUFA, Monounsaturated Fatty Acids; LNA, α-Linolenic acid; ARA, Arachidonic Acid; EPA, Eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, Docosahexaenoic acid; PUFA, Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
30
Table 9: Liver fatty acid composition (mg/g fatty acids) of Argyrosomus regius fed the experimental
diets.
Liver:
Treatment
Analysis of variance
Fat acid (%) Initial A B C D PL DHA PL x DHA
14:00 5,1±0,4 4,0±0,5 3,1±0,2 4,0±0,2 3,0±0,2 n.s * n.s
16:00 23.0±1,1 20,5±0,6 20,2±0,1 22±0,6 21,4±0,4 * n.s n.s
18:00 4,8±0,4 5,2±0,6 4,9±0,3 6,2±0,2 6,4±0,1 * n.s n.s
Σ SFA 35,2±2,1 31,5±2,0 30,5±0,6 33,8±1,2 32,4±0,8 * * n.s
16:1(n9+n7) 12,0±0,3 8,3±0,7 7,9±0,1 7,7±0,3 6,8±0,2 * * n.s
18:1(n9+n7+n5) 16,7±0,5 21,6±0,6 21,3±0,5 21,4±0,4 21,7±0,1 n.s n.s n.s
20:1(n9+n7) 1,0±0,1 4,0±0,3 2,0±0,1 3,3±0,2 2,7±0,3 n.s * *
Σ Mufa 31,0±0,9 34,5±1,6 31,7±0,7 32,9±0,9 31,8±0,6 * * *
18:2n6 5,6±0,1 13,4±0,7 8,5±0,1 12,3±0,3 12,4±0,0 * * *
18:3n3 LNA 1,5±0,0 1,4±0,0 0,9±0,0 1,3±0,0 1,2±0,0 * * *
20:4n6 ARA 0,9±0,0 0,5±0,0 1,3±0,0 0,4±0,1 0,6±0,0 * * *
20:5n3 EPA 8,3±0,6 3,5±0,2 4,2±0,0 4,0±0,2 4,1±0,0 * * *
22:6n3 DHA 8,6±0,8 6,0±0,6 14,0±0,6 6,5±0,3 9,5±0,6 * * *
Σ Pufa 31,2±1,9 30,0±1,8 35,3±0,8 29,9±1,1 33,4±1,0 * * *
DHA/EPA 1,0±1,3 1,7±3,2 3,3±17,3 1,6±2,1 2,3±15,2 * * *
EPA/ARA 9,7±13,5 6,7±4,9 3,3±4,3 9,3±2,2 6,9±2,9 n.s n.s n.s
DHA/LNA 5,6±242,2 4,3±12,5 15,3±79,4 5,0±9,0 7,9±22,8 * * *
Σ n3 PUFA 22,6±1,6 13,7±1,0 21,7±0,7 15,0±0,7 18,2±0,9 * * *
Σ n6 PUFA 7,4±0,1 14,7±0,8 11,2±0,1 13,2±0,5 13,5±0,1 * * *
Ratio n3/n6 3,1±11,2 0,9±1,3 1,9±5,0 1,1±1,4 1,3±12,4 * * n.s
Σ (Sfa+Mufa+Pufa) 97,4±0,2 96,0±5,4 97,4±2,1 96,6±3,3 97,6±2,4 * * n.s Mean values and standard error of the mean (±SE) are presented for each parameter (n=3). In the right moiety of the table, results from two way ANOVA are reflected; asterisks indicate significant differences as *P<0.05; n.s. indicates non significant differences; SFA, Saturated Fatty Acids; MUFA, Monounsaturated Fatty Acids; LNA, α-Linolenic acid; ARA, Arachidonic Acid; EPA, Eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, Docosahexaenoic acid; PUFA, Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
31
Table 10: Brain fatty acid composition (% fatty acids) of Argyrosomus regius fed the experimental diets.
Brain:
Treatment
Analysis of variance
Fat acid (%) Initial A B C D PL DHA PL x DHA
14:00 0,5 0,8±0,2 0,6±0,2 0,7±0,1 0,7±0,1 n.s * n.s
16:00 19,0 19,3±0,7 18,7±0,3 18,6±1,4 19,2±0,3 n.s n.s n.s
18:00 13,7 10,7±0,4 11,1±0,6 10,9±0,4 11,2±0,1 n.s n.s n.s
Σ SFA 34,7 31,9±1,4 31,7±1,1 31,2±2,0 32,7±1,4 n.s n.s n.s
16:1(n9+n7) 2,4 3,7±0,2 3,4±0,2 3,3±0,3 3,3±0,1 * n.s n.s
18:1(n9+n7+n5) 20,3 22,7±0,6 22,9±0,7 22,7±0,9 22,7±0,6 n.s n.s n.s
20:1(n9+n7) 0,6 1,7±0,2 1,2±0,1 1,4±0,0 0,9±0,2 * * n.s
Σ Mufa 26,2 28,8±1,1 28,1±1,0 28,0±1,3 27,5±1,0 n.s n.s n.s
18:2n6 1,4 4,6±0,7 3,1±0,3 3,4±0,3 2,9±0,6 * * *
18:3n3 LNA 0,3 0,4±0,1 0,2±0,0 0,3±0,0 0,2±0,0 * * *
20:4n6 ARA 1,5 1,5±0,0 1,8±0,1 1,4±0,1 1,1±0,3 * n.s *
20:5n3 EPA 4,0 3,4±0,1 3,2±0,1 3,7±0,2 3,1±0,8 n.s * n.s
22:6n3 DHA 21,3 17,0±0,9 18,7±0,3 18,6±1,6 18,5±0,6 n.s n.s n.s
Σ Pufa 36,3 35,3±2,7 36,3±1,3 36,5±2,9 35,7±3,8 n.s n.s n.s
DHA/EPA 5,3 5,0±8,0 6,0±3,9 5,1±8,3 5,9±0,8 n.s n.s n.s
EPA/ARA 2,6 2,3±2,2 1,7±1,0 2,7±2,3 2,8±2,2 n.s * n.s
DHA/LNA 71,2 45,4±11,9 76,6±7,0 72,1±96,0 76,1±27,6 * * *
Σ n3 PUFA 32,7 27,7±1,7 29,6±0,7 30,6±2,3 30,2±2,3 * n.s n.s
Σ n6 PUFA 3,5 6,5±0,9 5,5±0,5 5,1±0,6 4,7±1,3 * * *
Ratio n3/n6 9,2 4,3±1,8 5,4±1,3 6,0±4,1 6,5±1,7 * * n.s
Σ (Sfa+Mufa+Pufa) 97,3 96,0±0,1 96,0±0,1 95,7±0,1 95,9±0,1 n.s n.s n.s
Mean values and standard error of the mean (±SE) are presented for each parameter (n=3). In the right moiety of the table, results from two way ANOVA are reflected; asterisks indicate significant differences as *P<0.05; n.s. indicates non significant differences; SFA, Saturated Fatty Acids; MUFA, Monounsaturated Fatty Acids; LNA, α-Linolenic acid; ARA, Arachidonic Acid; EPA, Eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, Docosahexaenoic acid; PUFA, Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
32
Table 11: Muscle fatty acid composition (% of total fatty acids) of Argyrosomus regius fed the experimental diets.
Muscle:
Treatment
Analysis of variance
Fat acid (%) Initial A B C D PL DHA PL x DHA
14:00 2,7 2,8±0,4 2,4±0,4 2,8±0,2 3,4±0,6 * n.s n.s
16:00 19,3 20,1±1,5 21,0±1,1 20,6±0,6 21,5±1,1 n.s n.s n.s
18:00 5,8 5,9±0,7 6,5±0,5 5,7±0,1 5,2±0,3 * n.s *
Σ SFA 29,4 30,4±3,0 31,9±2,2 30,4±0,9 31,5±2,1 n.s n.s n.s
16:1(n9+n7) 4,6 4,5±0,5 4,5±0,4 4,1±0,2 4,4±0,5 n.s n.s n.s
18:1(n9+n7+n5) 14,6 19,0±0,2 19,4±0,3 18,5±0,3 18,4±0,2 * n.s n.s
20:1(n9+n7) 1,2 3,6±0,6 1,9±0,2 3,1±0,1 2,4±0,1 n.s * *
Σ Mufa 22,0 27,4±1,4 26,1±0,9 26,2±0,7 25,7±0,9 * * n.s
18:2n6 4,6 11,4±0,7 7,2±0,1 11,9±0,2 11,8±0,2 * * *
18:3n3 LNA 1,2 1,1±0,1 0,7±0,1 1,1±0,1 1,1±0,0 * * *
20:4n6 ARA 1,7 1,3±0,2 1,9±0,1 1,0±0,1 0,9±0,1 * * *
20:5n3 EPA 12,1 5,5±0,1 5,3±0,2 6,4±0,1 5,7±0,3 * * n.s
22:6n3 DHA 20,1 13,9±0,3 19,0±0,6 14,2±1,1 14,9±1,5 * * *
Σ Pufa 46,3 37,9±1,9 39,4±1,4 39,6±1,8 39,6±2,4 n.s n.s n.s
DHA/EPA 1,7 2,5±5,0 3,6±3,1 2,2±14,7 2,6±6,1 * * *
EPA/ARA 7,3 4,4±0,4 2,8±1,8 6,5±1,3 6,3±2,7 * * *
DHA/LNA 17,0 12,9±2,9 28,2±4,9 12,4±19,0 13,0±37,4 n.s n.s n.s
Σ n3 PUFA 37,9 23,4±0,7 27,5±1,1 25,2±1,4 25,3±2,1 n.s * *
Σ n6 PUFA 7,5 13,2±1,0 10,1±0,2 13,2±0,3 13,0±0,3 * * *
Ratio n3/n6 5,0 1,8±0,8 2,7±4,7 1,9±4,1 1,9±7,1 * * * Σ (Sfa+Mufa+Pufa) 97,7 95,7±6,3 97,5±4,6 96,2±3,4 96,9±5,4 n.s * *
Mean values and standard error of the mean (±SE) are presented for each parameter (n=3). In the right moiety of the table, results from two way ANOVA are reflected; asterisks indicate significant differences as *P<0.05; n.s. indicates non significant differences; SFA, Saturated Fatty Acids; MUFA, Monounsaturated Fatty Acids; LNA, α-Linolenic acid; ARA, Arachidonic Acid; EPA, Eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA, Docosahexaenoic acid; PUFA, Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids.
The level of ARA (mg/g) was low in all tissues, and it was positively related to the
level of DHA and negatively related to the level of PL in the diets. Diet
supplementation with DHA and PL did not affect deposition of total SFA in the
different organs (mg/g). Total MUFA deposition in the liver (mg/g), decreased with
the ingestion of diets with higher DHA and increased with higher PL dietary content.
As can be seen in figure 6 an increase of dietary PL reduced the PUFA in the liver
and the opposite is true for DHA. However higher dietary PL supplementation
promoted increased PUFA in the muscle and this effect was more preponderant with
the presence of 2.0% DHA in the diet.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
33
PL n.s * * DHA * * * PL*DHA * * *
PL n.s * * DHA n.s * * PL*DHA n.s n.s n.s
PL n.s n.s * PL n.s n.s n.s DHA n.s n.s * DHA n.s n.s n.s PL*DHA n.s n.s * PL*DHA n.s n.s n.s
PL * n.s * PL n.s n.s * DHA n.s * * DHA n.s n.s n.s PL*DHA n.s n.s * PL*DHA n.s * * Figure 6: Variation of different fatty acids Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), Arachidonic acid (ARA), Total saturated fatty acid (ΣSFA), Total monounsaturated fatty acid (ΣMUFA) and Total polyunsatureted fatty acid (ΣPUFA) in the liver, brain and muscle (in mg/g) of Argyrosomus regius fed the experimental diets. Results from two way ANOVA are reflected; asterisks indicate significant differences as *P<0.05; n.s. indicates non significant differences.
0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0 70,0
EPA DHA ARA
Liver (mg/g):
A
B
C
D 0,0 30,0 60,0 90,0 120,0 150,0 180,0 210,0
Σ SFA Σ MUFA Σ PUFA
Liver (mg/g):
A
B
C
D
0,0 10,0 20,0 30,0 40,0 50,0 60,0
EPA DHA ARA
Brain (mg/g):
A
B
C
D 0,0 20,0 40,0 60,0 80,0 100,0 120,0
Σ SFA Σ MUFA Σ PUFA
Brain (mg/g):
A
B
C
D
0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
50,0
EPA DHA ARA
Muscle (mg/g):
A
B
C
D 0,0
10,0
20,0
30,0
40,0
Σ SFA Σ MUFA Σ PUFA
Muscle (mg/g):
A
B
C
D
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
34
The lipid class profiles of meagre fed the four different diets is shown in figure 7. PL
is more constant than TAG once these are the major components of cellular
membranes. PL only increased in muscle and liver with the increment of DHA and
decrease of PL in the diets, respectively.
On the other hand, the TAG levels in tissues are highly variable, depending on diet.
TAG is the dominant lipid class in liver and muscle, while in the brain the major
constituent is cholesterol. TAG in the liver and brain were higher in fish fed the diets
with 4.0% PL and decreased with the dietary increase of DHA. In the muscle, TAG
increased with the increase of PL in the diet, and the best TAG deposition was in
meagre feed diets with 4.0% PL and 1.0% DHA content.
FFA in liver and brain showed an opposite behavior; in the liver, higher DHA diet
boost the concentration of FFA in the tissues and a higher PL diet lower it, while in
the brain occurred the opposite. In the muscle, highest concentration of FFA was
observed in fish fed the diet containing less PL and DHA, although lowest
concentration of FFA was obtained in fish fed the diet with lower DHA and higher PL.
In the liver, CH was not affected by dietary composition while in the muscle CH level
decreased with the increase of dietary DHA and PL. In the brain, CH increased with
the increase of dietary DHA and decreased with the increase of dietary PL.
MAG in the muscle increased with as dietary DHA decreased, although it decreased
with more PL in the diet. In the brain, concentration of MAG was higher in fish fed the
diet with less DHA and PL and decreased when fish was fed diets with higher DHA
and less PL.
Fat percentage, shown in table 12, is higher in the liver than in the others organs,
wherein the muscle shows the lowest fat percentage. The amount of fat in the brain
seems not be affected by the diets, presenting constant concentration.
The liver and muscle of the meagre fed the diet with less DHA and PL presented a
severe decrease of fat deposition.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
35
Table 12: Lipid class composition (% total of lipid class) and fat deposition (%) of liver, brain and muscle of Argyrosomus regius fed the experimental diets.
Treatment
Analysis of variance
Liver:
Inicial A B C D Pl DHA Pl x DHA
TAG (%) 76.4±2.7 87.5±1.9 85.6±1.0 89.9±0.6 86.5±2.1 * * n.s
FFA (%) 11.0±2.1 4.1±1.0 5.0±0.5 3.0±0.2 4.8±0.9 * * n.s
CH (%) 8.4±0.5 5.7±1.0 5.7±0.8 4.6±0.4 5.8±1.1 n.s n.s n.s
PL (%) 2.8±0.3 2.6±0.2 3.0±0.4 2.5±0.2 3.0±0.3 n.s * n.s
Fat (%) - 30.7 65.1 62.5 66.3 - - -
Muscle:
Inicial A B C D Pl DHA Pl x DHA
TAG 58.1±3.8 55.8±0.7 71.6±2.8 73.1±1.3 71.7±0.9 * * *
FFA 11.7±1.6 19.0±0.8 8.4±1.1 6.4±0.8 9.5±0.2 * * *
CH 22.5±1.8 16.3±1.1 13.1±1.0 13.9±0.7 12.9±0.6 * * *
MAG 1.7±0.5 3.4±0.3 1.7±0.1 2.0±0.4 1.7±0.2 * * *
PL 6.0±1.1 5.5±1.2 5.2±2.4 4.6±0.8 4.1±0.4 * n.s n.s
Fat (%) - 4.8 7.1 6.3 7.5 - - -
Brain: Inicial A B C D Pl DHA Pl x DHA
TAG - 21.3±2.2 16.6±1.7 31.0±2.1 24.0±1.2 * * n.s
FFA 297±1.2 8.5±1.3 6.0±0.7 9.9±0.8 6.3±0.8 * * n.s
CH 29.7±1.2 51.3±2.5 64.6±2.6 45.2±2.0 53.4±2.6 * * *
MAG 3.4±0.4 4.3±0.6 1.8±0.5 2.2±0.4 2.4±0.1 * * *
PL 10.3±1.3 14.6±1.7 11.0±0.7 11.8±1.6 13.9±2.6 n.s n.s *
Fat (%) - 49.3 46.8 47.7 48.1 - - -
Mean values and standard error of the mean (±SE) are presented for each parameter (n=3). In the right moiety of the table, results from two way ANOVA are reflected; asterisks indicate significant differences as *P<0.05; n.s. indicates non significant differences; TAG, triacylglycerols; FFA, free fatty acids; CH, cholesterol; MAG, Monoacylglycerol; PL, phospholipids.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
36
PL * * n.s n.s DHA * * n.s * PL*DHA n.s n.s n.s n.s PL * * * * n.s DHA * * * * n.s PL*DHA n.s n.s * * * PL * * * * * DHA * * * * n.s PL*DHA * * * * n.s Figure 7: Variation of different lipid class, triacylglycerols (TAG); free fatty acids (FFA); cholesterol (CH); Monoacylglycerol (MAG); phospholipids (PL), in the liver, brain and muscle (in %) of Argyrosomus regius fed the experimental diets. Results from two way ANOVA are reflected; asterisks indicate significant differences as *P<0.05; n.s. indicates non significant differences.
0,0
20,0
40,0
60,0
80,0
100,0
TAG FFA CH PL
Liver (%):
A
B
C
D
0,0 20,0 40,0 60,0 80,0
TAG FFA CH MAG PL
Brain (%):
A
B
C
D
0,0
20,0
40,0
60,0
80,0
TAG FFA CH MAG PL
Muscle (%):
A
B
C
D
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
37
3.5- Oxidative Stress Dietary DHA did not affect oxidative stress enzymes activity. SOD and G6PDH were
the only antioxidant enzymes affected by PL (Table 13). Increase of dietary PL
increased the activity of these two enzymes. TBARS content was not affected by the
increase of PL or DHA in the diet.
Table 13: Activities of glutathione peroxidase (GPX; mU mg−1 protein), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PDH), glutathione reductase (GR), and catalase (CAT) (U mg−1 protein), and TBARS content (nmol MDA g tissue−1) of Argyrosomus regius fed the experimental diets
Treatment
Analysis of variance
Oxidative enzimes A B C D PL DHA
PL x DHA
SOD 314.5±155.3 293.0±138.1 547.4±266.2 549.5±211.6 * ns ns GPX 353.1±70.6 263.1±64.1 359.1±140.3 334.6±51.9 ns ns ns G6PDH 91.6±19.0 81.0±12.7 111.7±9.5 125.3±24.7 * ns ns GR 11.3±0.6 11.2±1.5 9.9±1.7 11.2±1.5 ns ns ns CAT 255.4±23.2 284.4±34.2 271.2±61.1 278.1±41.2 ns ns ns TBARS 5.5±0.8 6.4±1.9 6.2±1.6 5.6±0.6 ns ns ns
Mean values and standard error of the mean (±SE) are presented for each parameter (n=3). In the right moiety of the table, results from two way ANOVA are reflected; asterisks indicate significant differences as *P<0.05; n.s. indicates non significant differences.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
38
4- Discussion
Mortality was very low and it was not affected by dietary supplementation with DHA
and PL. Studies in different species and stages of development also showed that
DHA and PL do not promote mortality (Hamza et al., 2008; Wold et al., 2007; Wu et
al., 2011; Coutteau et al., 1996; Wu et al., 2007; Li et al., 2014; Geurden et al., 1997;
Villalta et al., 2005; Morton et al., 2014; Lund et al., 2007; Om et al., 2001). Although
improvements in survival rates have been registered in larvae fed diets
supplemented with PL and n-3 HUFA (Zhao et al., 2013; Kanazawa, 1997; Das et al.,
2007; Kontara et al., 1997; Gao et al., 2014; Rezek et al., 2010; Furuita et al., 1996)
in this study mortality was already very low with all diets.
Data of the present trial indicates that an increase of dietary phospholipids up to
4.0% promoted growth performance, increasing FBW and SGR, and decreased
FCR. Most available literature report a positive effect of dietary PL in improving
growth of larvae and juveniles of several species of fish and crustaceans, such as
dojo loach Misgunnus anguillicaudatus larvae (Gao et al., 2014), European sea bass
Dicentrarchus labrax and turbot Scophthalmus maximus juveniles (Geurden et al.,
1997a), common carp Cyprinus carpio (Geurden et al., 1997b), yellow croaker
Larmichthys crocea larvae (Zhao et al., 2013), juvenile swimming crab Portunus
trituberculatus (Li et al., 2014), Atlantic cod Gadus morhua larvae (Wold et al., 2007),
pikeperch Sander Lucioperca larvae (Hamza et al., 2008), tilapia Oreochronnis
niloticus (Atar et al., 2009), shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei juveniles (Niu et al., 2011)
and blunt snout bream Megalobrama ambblycephala fingerlings (Li et al., 2015).
Therefore supporting that dietary PLs may be required for good physiological
function and development of some fish species due the fact that larvae and juveniles
may have low ability to biosynthesize PL de novo (Kanazawa, 1993; Geurden et al.,
1995). It is also possible that PL are essential for an efficient lipoprotein synthesis,
promoting transport of dietary fatty acids and lipids from the gut to the rest of the
body (NCR, 2011). On the contrary, Gibbs et al. (2009) showed a negative
correlation between dietary PL level and weight gain. So, the role of dietary PL in
larval and early juvenile nutrition are not yet fully understood and more studies are
needed to clarify it.
Our results showed that dietary supplementation with 2.0% DHA did not seem to
affect the performance of meagre. On the contrary, Mourente et al. (1993) observed
that the best growth rate of Sparus aurata larvae was achieved with an high n-3
HUFA content and an high DHA/EPA ratio and Nevejan et al. (2003) showed that
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
39
dietary supplementation of 20% and 40% lipid emulsion rich in EPA and DHA led to a
significantly better daily growth rate of scallop larvae, Argopecten purpuratus. Rezek
et al. (2010) also showed that growth (body length and body weight) was higher in
larvae of black sea bass, Centropristis striata, fed preys enriched with 10% DHA
against 0% DHA, and Om et al. (2001) showed that fortification with 3% EPA and
DHA increased the weight gain and feed conversion efficiency of juvenile black sea
bream Acanthopagrus schlegeli. Ji et al. (2011) observed in juvenile grass carp,
Ctenopharyngodon idellus, that weight gain, specific growth rate, feed efficiency and
protein efficiency improved by increasing dietary HUFAs content from 0% to 0.52%
and declined thereafter. These results support the hypothesis that HUFA
administration may improve larval development through the presence of better
structured mitochondria, a higher synthesis of energy compounds and coenzymes
with a central position in the metabolism. This higher energy status was confirmed by
better growth performance and a shorter larval phase of clownfish, Amphiprion
ocellaris, fed with a live prey enriched with DHA in relation to control group (non
enriched live prey) (Olivotto et al., 2011).
Similar to our results, Morton et al. (2014); Villalta et al. (2005); Furuita et al. (1996)
and Rodriguez et al. (1998) also observed that there was no significant relationship
between dietary DHA and growth (juvenile barramundi Lates calcarifer, in larvae
senegal sole Solea senegalensis, juvenile red sea bream Pagrus major and larvae of
Sparus aurata), and Lund et al., 2007 also showed that growth rate in common sole
larvae was not related to ARA or dietary EFA combinations.
In the present work we found that there was a significant interaction between dietary
DHA and PL, and the best final weight was achieved with the diet with higher levels
of DHA and PL. This may be due the fact that incorporation more PL in the diet
provided more PL to be used as component of the membranes, which is essential for
rapid growth of juveniles, and more DHA in the diet would improve the incorporation
of DHA in PL membranes. Both DHA and EFA are important precursor of
eicosanoids that can exert anti-inflammatory response thus promoting the heath of
the fish and enhancing the growth of the fish. Results of Félix et al. (2002) are
partially in disagreement with our results, indicating that no significant interaction
exist between PL and DHA on growth of Litopenaeus vannamei juveniles; however,
diets containing both PL and DHA showed significant higher instantaneous growth
rate. In Penaeus japonicus post-larvae growth increased with increasing levels of n-3
HUFA and the addition of soybean phosphatidylcholine to the diet further improved
growth, and no interaction between these two dietary supplements was observed
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
40
(Kontara, 1997). Although some reports showed a possible interaction between PL
and DHA, in larvae of red sea bream, Pagrus major, the presence of 1-2% DHA and
5% PL improved growth performance (Kanazawa, 1997). So our results also seem to
support the beneficial effects of supplementing diets with PL and DHA to achieve
maximum growth of meagre juveniles.
The HSI is usually used as indicator of the nutritional state of fish once the liver is a
storage organ of glycogen and fat in several species. An increase in HSI was
observed in juveniles fed with the diets with higher PL content, supporting that PL
might improve lipid digestion (NCR, 2011). This may explain the increase of fat
deposition registered in this organ (63.3%). Our results contrast with those made in
juveniles of swimming crab Portunnus trituberculatus that don’t shown any influence
in HSI (Li et al., 2014) and in blunt snout bream Megalobrama amblycephala
fingerlings that had lower HSI in fish fed PL supplemented diets (Li et al., 2015). The
authors suggest that dietary PL could have promoted liver fat metabolism.
Besides, our results showed that diets with more DHA lead to a decrease in HSI
although this decrease was not observed when more PL was added to the diet. Wu
et al. (2007) tested diets with PL and HUFAs and didn’t have significant differences
in HSI in Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis. Jingying et al. (2014) demonstrated
in juveniles starry flounder Platichthys stellatus that HSI was higher with a DHA/EPA
ratio of 0.64 and it was lower with a DHA/EPA ratio of 1.18, although differences
were not statistically significant.
Proximal composition of meagre in this trial was also analysed, and this factor is
known to be influence by endogenous and exogenous factors. The levels of protein
are primarily related to the size of the fish (endogenous factor), while the lipid content
is associated with exogenous factors such as diet (Shearer, 1994). So this data
showed that protein content of fish carcase was not significantly affected by the
different diets and the lipid levels of the whole-body was affected by the
supplementation of PL and DHA. The same was observed in the energy content of
the carcass, showing that supplementation of 4.0% of PL and 2.0% of DHA in the
diet leads a more energy. Whole-body dry-matter significantly increased only in high
PL diets. This increase is related with increase of whole-body lipids. Data also
showed that diet supplementation with 4.0% of PL increased the CF. This may be
due the fact that fish growth more with more dietary PL.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
41
Researchers, in different species, have observed that inclusion of more PL in the diet
increased lipids content (Gao et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2013; Niu et al., 2011; Atar et
al., 2009). In addition, Zhao et al. (2013) reported an increase of protein in carcass
with more PL. In contrast, Li et al. (2015) showed that while crude protein content
increased with incremental dietary PL levels and the crude lipid content decreased.
Regarding dietary DHA, it seems that an increase of this FA promoted the effect of
PL in the energy and lipid content of the carcass. Mourete et al., 1993 also showed
that dietary DHA promoted an increase of total lipids content. We were unable to find
bibliography about interaction between PL and DHA.
Results of this study indicate that fish fed with more PL in the diet were more
susceptible to oxidative stress, as there was an increase of antioxidant enzymes
activity like SOD and G6PDH. However TBARs content, who is considered a
valuable indicator of oxidative damage of cellular components, was similar in all
treatments. So, fish fed the diet with 4.0% PL needed more antioxidant defenses to
maintain the same state of lipid peroxidation.
Few data exists on the effect of dietary PL supplementation on oxidative stress in
fish. Results of Li et al. (2015) contrast with ours as they show an increase of liver
CAT, SOD and GPX activities with incremental dietary PL level up to 6%, and
TBARS values negatively correlated with the activities of these enzymes. The
authors concluded that more dietary PL might minimize oxidative stress damage.
Gao et al. (2014) showed as well that 6% of PL in the dietary might influence larvae
antioxidant enzymes activities, such as induced of SOD and decrease of CAT and
GPX activities.
Although the susceptibility of each PUFA to oxidation is linearly proportional to the
degree of unsaturation (NCR, 2011), in this work diet supplementation with DHA at 1-
2% didn’t influence hepatic oxidative stress of meagre juveniles. There is one report
that also didn’t observe an increase of oxidative damage with high fish oil intake
(Ando et al., 2000), but the majority of bibliography seems to be in disagreement with
our data. Mourent et al. (2002) showed that a high pro-oxidative stress was induced
by feeding diets containing around 7% of dry weight as n-3 HUFA. In juvenile grass
carp, Ctenopharyngodon idellus the activities of SOD and the amount of TBARS
increased with increasing dietary HUFAs content up to 0.83% (Ji et al., 2011). The
results of Todorčević et al. (2009) indicate an increase of SOD activity in the DHA
and EPA groups showing that high dietary supplementation of DHA and EPA
resulted in oxidative stress. Betancor et al. (2012) showed that a high dietary content
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
42
of DHA, up to 5% DM, induced higher incidence of muscular lesions and TBARS
content.
The data of the present study are consistent with the well-established fact that the
fatty acid composition of fish tissue reflects that of the diet on which they have been
reared (Hamza et al., 2008; Villalta et al., 2005; Li et al., 2015). However, it is also
evident that fish actively modify dietary fatty acids by selective metabolism to
maintain narrowly defined levels in the membranes, reflecting a homeostatic
relationship in which fish tries to maintain optimal membrane function (Olsen and
Hunderson, 1997). In this study, the brain was the organ that maintained a more
constant composition. The same was observed by Betancor et al. (2014). Also, the
brain was the organ where higher concentrations of DHA were detected, regardless
of the diet. This is in agreement to what had been observed by Mourente (2003).
In the present study, it was shown that higher DHA supplementation in the diet
promoted higher deposition of this FA in the different organs. Similar results were
obtainde in larvae of Senegal sole Solea senegalensis (Villalta et al., 2005); in
shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei juveniles (González-Félix et al., 2002); in juveniles of
barramundi Lates calcarifer. High DHA retention were also observed when fish were
fed diets low in DHA, suggesting high conservation of this FA or possible synthesis of
DHA from EPA (Morton et al., 2014). Om et al. (2001) showed that EPA and DHA in
muscle, liver and adipocytes in juvenile of Acanthopagrus schlegeli were markedly
increased by diet fortification with EPA and DHA, and Ji et al., 2011 demonstrated
that levels of EPA and DHA increased with increasing dietary HUFAs content.
In this work, percentage of DHA in the tissues was higher than in the diet and the
opposite was observed for EPA, results that are in accordance with those of Morton
et al. (2014) and Betancor et al. (2014), and indicating the important role of this FA in
cell membranes.
Diet supplementation with PL had significant interaction with DHA content in the liver,
which contrasts with results of González-Félix et al. (2002) which indicate that PL
doesn’t interact with EFA.
Our results showed that PL and DHA supplementation didn’t exert any significant
influence in deposition of SFA but decreased MUFA contents in the liver of meagre.
Zhao et al. (2013) obtained similar results in yellow croaker, where there were no
significant differences in SFA, mainly 16:0, 18:0 and 20:0, in both polar and neutral
lipid fractions of larvae, and MUFA in both polar and neutral lipid fractions decreased
as dietary PL increased. Furthermore, Villalta et al. (2005) showed that with PL and
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
43
DHA supplementation there was a MUFA decrease in the head and carcass. Li et al.
(2014) observed that muscle had higher HUFA levels, especially for EPA, and lower
MUFA levels. Jingjing et al. (2014) showed that saturated FA in liver were all
decrease with the increase of dietary DHA/EPA and the sum of monounsaturated FA
remained constant, excluding that 18:1 n-9, which was decreased by dietary
treatments. Results from Betancor et al. (2014) indicate that levels of SFA and MUFA
in liver PL were noticeably lower than those of the feed. Om et al., 2001 observed
that the saturated and monounsaturated fatty acid levels in the EPA/DHA-fortified
group were lower than those in the control group. Ji et al., 2011 observed that the
levels of 20:1 n-9, total saturated and total monounsaturated fatty acids in muscle
decreased with increasing dietary HUFAs content. Zhao et al. (2013) showed that
fish larvae fed live prey (control) had higher SFA composition than larvae fed
microdiets with PL supplementation. MUFA of fish larvae fed live prey were
comparable to those in treatments with 26.0 and 38.5 g kg−1 PL, but higher than in
treatments with 57.2 g kg−1 or higher PL. Olsen and Henderson, (1997) observed no
differences in saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids between dietary groups
containing different levels of PUFA.
In general, results of all these authors suggest that supplementation of PL and/ or
HUFAS promotes the accumulation of HUFA, by shifting the metabolism to a
preferential use of SFA and MUFA as energy sources for β-oxidation.
In this study, PL and DHA seemed to promote an increase of PUFAs in the muscle of
meagre. The increase of PL concentration in the diet promoted an increase of total n-
3 and n-6 PUFA while DHA only promoted an increase of total n-3 PUFA. This is in
agreement with a competitive interaction with the same metabolic pathways of
degradation, elongation and desaturation by both n-3 and n-6 FA. Dietary PL also
improved intestinal absorption of total PUFA. This results seen to be in agreement
with Ji et al.,(2011) that observed increased PUFAs, n-3 PUFAs, n-3 HUFAs and n-
3/n-6 fatty acids in the muscle in fish fed diets with high dietary HUFAs. Kontara et al.
(1997) also observed that inclusion of soybean phosphatidylcholine (SPC) in the diet
resulted in increased lipid and n-3 HUFA in shrimp tissues compared to that of
shrimp fed PL-free diets containing similar levels of total and n-3 HUFA; Geurden et
al. (1997b) concluded that the major effect of diet PL supplementation on fish FA
composition was that total fatty acids were richer in n-6 and n-3 HUFA when fish
were fed dietary PL. Hamza et al. (2008) observed that the major effect of dietary PL
supplementation on larval FA composition was an increase in the percentage of total
n-6 and decrease of n-3 FA (especially 20:5n-3 and 22:n-3). On the contrary, Zhao et
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
44
al. (2013) observed that n−3 PUFA decreased but n−6 PUFA increased with the
increase of dietary PL in microdiets.
As far as we know, there is not much bibliography on the effect of DHA and PL on
lipid class composition. In this study, was notorious the influence of DHA and PL on
different lipid class in muscle, brain and liver, although studies made by Vagner et al.
(2013) and Betancor et al. (2014) showed no difference among diets with respect to
lipid classes.
In our work, an increase of dietary PL decreased the PL content and promoted TAG
retention in the three tissues of meagre juveniles. This may be due to the fact that
dietary PL promoted the incorporation of TAG, acting like lipid emulsification,
enhancing the transport an absorption of lipids and PL, that are structural
components of membranes, on the contrary of TAG that are manly used for energy
reserve. Our results agree with those of Gao et al. (2014) that showed that the whole
body PL decreased with incremental dietary PL levels, and those of Li et al. (2014)
that observed an increase of TAG levels in the hemolymph with diet PL
supplementation.
Our results also showed a decrease of CH content in the muscle and brain of
meagre fed diets with more PL. This is not in accordance with NCR (2011) that
assign PL as having an important role as component of high density lipoproteins, that
transport CH from the gut to the tissues. Li et al (2014) showed that CH levels
increased with soybean lecithin supplementation although with egg yolk lecithin
supplementation the levels of CH displayed a tendency to decrease.
4.1- Conclusion
Meagre is a very promising species for aquaculture as it has a fast growth rate fish,
and this work confirms this, as in two months juveniles quadruplicated their initial
weight and their FCR was similar or better than that of other cultured Mediterranean
species, such as Dicentrachus labrax and Sparus aurata.
The increase of PL in the diets improved growth performance and feed utilization, as
well as whole body lipids.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
45
One of the concerns that fish nutrition faces is the attempt of replacement of fishmeal
and fish oil feeds for alternative sources, and their impacts on DHA and EPA
contents in fish. The principal provider of n-3 HUFA in the diets is fish oil, and during
recent decades the importance of these fatty acids in human heath has been
continuously increasing. This study shows that inclusion of DHA in the diet improves
the retention of this FA in the muscle, thereby obtaining fish with higher nutritional
value for human consumption. These results may be very useful for production of
finishing diets.
No major changes were also observed in lipid peroxidation levels related to an
increase of PL and DHA in the diet.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
46
5- References Ackman, R.G. (1980). ‘‘Fish lipids.’’ Part 1. In: Advances in Fish Science and
Technology (Connell J. J., ed.). Fishing News Books, Farnham, Surrey, UK 86–103.
Alava, V.R., Kanazawa, A., Teshima, S., Sakamoto, S., (1993). ‘‘Effect of
dietary phospholipids and n-3 highly unsaturated fatty acids on ovarian development
of kuruma prawn.’’ Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 59: 345–351.
Allan, G., H. Heasman, P. Ferrar (2006). ‘‘Report on the Aquaculture
Nutrition.’’ Master Class held at Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand.
The ATSE Crawford Fund
Amoedo, A. J. V. (2011). ‘‘Determinação do requisito proteico em juvenis de
corvina (Argyrosomus regius, Asso, 1801).’’ Master's thesis in Aquatic Sciences and
Marine Resources - Specialization in Aquaculture and Fisheries. Instituto de Ciências
Biomédicas de Abel Salazar, Universidade do Porto.
Ando, K., K. Nagata, R. Yoshida, K. Kikugawa, M. Suzuki (2000). ‘‘Effect of n-
3 Polynsaturated Fatty Acid Supplementation on Lipid Peroxidation of Rat Organs.’’
Paper no. L8346 in Lipids 35, 401–407.
Antonopoulou, E., E. Kousidou, E. Tserga, K. Feidantsis and S. Chatzifotis
(2014). "Dietary lipid levels in meagre (Argyrosomus regius): Effects on biochemical
and molecular indicators of liver." Aquaculture 428-429: 265-271.
Atalah, E., C. M. Hernández-Cruz, E. Ganuza, T. Benítez-Santana, R.
Ganga, J. Roo, D. Montero and M. Izquierdo (2011). "Importance of dietary
arachidonic acid for the growth, survival and stress resistance of larval European sea
bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fed high dietary docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic
acids." Aquaculture Research 42(9): 1261-1268.
Atar, H. H., S. Bekcan and M. Olmez (2009). "The Effects of Dietary of
Soybean Lecithin on the Growth Performance Feed Conversion and Body
Composition of Tilapia (Oreochromis nilotics L.) Fry." Journal of Animal and
Veterinary Advances 8(8): 1678-1684.
Austreng, E. and A. Krogdahl (1987). ‘‘Food quality of cultured salmonids
can be influenced.’’ Feedstuff 59: 12–14.
Bell, M.V., Henderson, R.J., Sargent, J.R., (1986). ‘‘The role of
polyunsaturated fatty acids in fish.’’ Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 83B: 711 – 719.
Benitez-Santana, T., E. Atalah, M. B. Betancor, M. J. Caballero, C. M.
Hernandez-Cruz and M. Izquierdo (2014). "DHA but not EPA, enhances sound
induced escape behavior and Mauthner cells activity in Sparus aurata." Physiol
Behav 124: 65-71.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
47
Betancor M. (2012). ‘‘Oxidative stress in sea bass larvae (Dicentrachus
labrax) fed on high DHA microdiets. Involviment of several antioxidante nutrientes’’.
PhD thesis Acuicultura: Producción controlada de organismos acuáticos. Instituto
Universitario de Sanidad Animal y Seguridad Alimentaria, Las Palmas de Gran
Canaria. 321
Betancor, M. B., F. J. Howarth, B. D. Glencross and D. R. Tocher (2014).
"Influence of dietary docosahexaenoic acid in combination with other long-chain
polyunsaturated fatty acids on expression of biosynthesis genes and phospholipid
fatty acid compositions in tissues of post-smolt Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)." Comp
Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 172-173: 74-89.
Brahmbhatt, V., M. Oliveira, M. Briand, G. Perrisseau, V. Bastic Schmid, F.
Destaillats, C. Pace-Asciak, J. Benyacoub and N. Bosco (2013). "Protective effects
of dietary EPA and DHA on ischemia-reperfusion-induced intestinal stress." J Nutr
Biochem 24(1): 104-111.
Brinkmeyer, R. L. and G. J. Holt (1998). "Highly unsaturated fatty acids in
diets for red drum (Sciaenops ocellatus) larvae." Aquaculture 161: 253-268.
Cahu, C., Guillaume, J.C., Staphan, J., Chim, L., (1994). ‘‘Influence of
phospholipid and highly unsaturated fatty acids on spawning rate and egg and tissue
composition in Penaeus vannamei fed semipurified diets.’’ Aquaculture 126: 159–
170.
Cahu, C. L., E. Gisbert, L. A. N. Villeneuve, S. Morais, N. Hamza, P.-A. Wold
and J. L. Zambonino Infante (2009). "Influence of dietary phospholipids on early
ontogenesis of fish." Aquaculture Research 40(9): 989-999.
Cárdenas, S. (2010). ‘‘Crianza de la corvina (Argyrosomus regius)’’
Cuadernos de Acuicultura n° 3, Madrid: Fundación OESA.
Cardia, F. and A. Lovatelli (2007). ‘‘A review of cage aquaculture.’’ In: Cage
Aquaculture: Regional Reviews and Global Overviews (M. Halwart, D. Soto and J.R.
Arthur, eds.). Rome, Italy: FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 498
Castell, J. D., J. G. Bell, D. R. Tocher and J. R. Sargent (1994). "Effects of
purified diets containing different combinations of arachidonic and docosahexaenoic
acid on survival, growth and fatty acid composition of juvenile turbot (Scophthalmus
maximus)." Aquaculture 128: 315-333.
Castro, C., A. Pérez-Jiménez, F. Coutinho, P. Pousão-Ferreira, T. M.
Brandão, A. Oliva-Teles and H. Peres (2013). "Digestive enzymes of meagre
(Argyrosomus regius) and white seabream (Diplodus sargus). Effects of dietary
brewer's spent yeast supplementation." Aquaculture 416-417: 322-327.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
48
Chatzifotis S., Panagiotidou M., Papaioannou N., Pavlidis M., Nengas I.,
Mylonas C. C. (2010). ‘‘Effect of dietary lipid levels on growth, feed utilization, body
composition and serum metabolites of meagre (Argyrosomus regius) juveniles.’’
Aquaculture 307: 65–70.
Chatzifotis S., Panagiotidou M., Divanach P. (2012). ‘‘Effect of protein and
lipid dietary levels on the growth of juvenile meagre (Argyrosomus regius).’’
Aquaculture International 20: 91–98.
Chaung, H. C., C. D. Chang, P. H. Chen, C. J. Chang, S. H. Liu and C. C.
Chen (2013). "Docosahexaenoic acid and phosphatidylserine improves the
antioxidant activities in vitro and in vivo and cognitive functions of the developing
brain." Food Chem 138(1): 342-347.
Chi, S.Y., Q. C. Zhou, B. P. Tan, X. H. Dong, Q. H. Yang. and J. B. Zhou
(2010). ‘‘Effect of dietary protein and lipid levels on growth performance, carcass
composition, and digestive enzyme of the juvenile spotted’’. Journal of the World
Aquaculture Society 41(6): 903-911.
Cho, C.Y., Kaushik, S.J., (1990). ‘‘Nutritional energetics in fish: energy and
protein utilization in rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri).’’ World Rev. Nutr. Diet. 61, 132–
172.
Conklin, D.E., D'Abramo, L.R., Brodner, C.E., Baum, N.A., (1980). ‘‘A
successful purified diet for the culture of juvenile lobsters: The effect of lecithin.’’
Aquaculture 21: 243–249.
Copeman L.A., Parrish C.C., Brown J.A. & Harel M. (2002). ‘‘Efects of
docosahexanoic, eicosapentaenoic, and arachidonic acids on the early growth,
survival, lipid composition and pigmentation of yellowtail flounder Limanda
ferruginea: a live food enrichment experiment.’’ Aquaculture 210: 285-304.
Craig, S. and L. A. Helfrich (2009). ‘‘Understanding Fish Nutrition, Feeds, and
Feeding’’. Virginia Cooperative Extension 420-256.
Coutteau, P., M. R. Camara and P. Sorgeloos (1996). "The effect of different
levels and sources of dietary phosphatidylcholine on the growth, survival, stress
resistance, and fatty acid composition of postlarval Penaeus vannamei." Aquaculture
147: 261-273.
Coutteau, P., I. Geurden, M. R. Camara, P. Bergot and P. Sorgeloos (1997).
"Review on the dietary effects of phospholipids in fish and crustacean larviculture."
Aquaculture 155: 149-164.
Das, S. K., V. K. Tiwari, G. Venkateshwarlu, A. K. Reddy, J. Parhi, P. Sharma
and J. K. Chettri (2007). "Growth, survival and fatty acid composition of
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
49
Macrobrachium rosenbergii (de Man, 1879) post larvae fed HUFA-enriched Moina
micrura." Aquaculture 269(1-4): 464-475.
Dos Santos, J., I. C. Burkow and M. Jobling (1993). ‘‘Patterns of growth and
lipid deposition in cod, Gadus morhua L., fed natural prey and fish- based feeds.’’
Aquaculture 110: 173–189.
Dowhan, W. (1997). "Molecular basis for membrane phospholipids diversity:
Why are there so many lipids?" Biochem 66: 199-232.
Du, Z.Y., Clouet, P., Zheng, W.H., Degrace, P., Tian, L.X., Liu, Y.J., (2006).
‘‘Biochemical hepatic alterations and body lipid composition in the herbivorous grass
carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella) fed high-fat diets.’’ Br. J. Nutr. 95: 905 -915.
Du, Z.Y., Clouet, P., Huang, L.M., Degrace, P., Zheng, W.H., He, J.G., Tian,
L.X., Liu, Y.J., (2008). ‘‘Utilization of different dietary lipid sources at high level in
herbivorous grass carp (Ctenopharyngodon idella): mechanism related to hepatic
fatty acid oxidation.’’ Aquaculture Nutr. 14: 77–92.
Duncan N., Estévez A., Porta J., Carazo I., Norambuena F., Aguilera C.,
Gairin I., Bucci F., Valles R., Mylonas C. C. (2012). ‘‘Reproductive development,
GnRHa-induced spawning and egg quality of wild meagre (Argyrosomus regius)
acclimatised to captivity.’’ Fish Physiol Biochem 38(5): 1273-86.
Enes, P., A. Pérez-Jiménez, H. Peres, A. Couto, P. Pousão-Ferreira and A.
Oliva-Teles (2012). "Oxidative status and gut morphology of white sea bream,
Diplodus sargus fed soluble non-starch polysaccharide supplemented diets."
Aquaculture 358-359: 79-84.
FAO, (2007). ‘‘The State of Food and Agriculture.’’
FAO, (2011). ‘‘Aquaculture production: quantities and values.’’
FAO, (2014). ‘‘The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture.’’
Farías, A. (2003). "Polyunsaturated fatty acids in total lipid and phospholipids
of chilean scallop Argopecten purpuratus (L.) larvae: effects of diet and temperature."
Aquaculture 228(1-4): 289-305.
Felton, G.W., (1995). ‘‘Oxidative stress of vertebrates and invertebrates.’’ In:
Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defenses in Biology (Ahmad, S., ed.). Chapman
and Hall, New York, 356–434.
Fontagné, S., L. Burtaire, G. Corraze and P. Bergot (2000). "Effects of dietary
medium-chain triacylglycerols (tricaprylin and tricaproin) and phospholipid supply on
survival, growth and lipid metabolism in common carp (Cyprinus carpio L.) larvae."
Aquaculture 190: 289-303.
Furuita, H., T. Takeuchi, M. Toyota and T. Watanabe (1996). "EPA and DHA
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
50
requirements in early juvenile red sea bream using HUFA enriched artemia nauplii."
Fisheries Science 62(2): 246-251.
Gao, J., S. Koshio, W. Wang, Y. Li, S. Huang and X. Cao (2014). "Effects of
dietary phospholipid levels on growth performance, fatty acid composition and
antioxidant responses of Dojo loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus larvae." Aquaculture
426-427: 304-309.
Geurden, I., P. Coutteau and P. Sorgeloos (1995). ‘‘Dietary phospholipids for
European seabass (Dicentrarchus Labrax L.) during first ongrowing.’’ LARVI '95 -
Fish & Shellfish Larviculture Symposium. P. Lavens, E. Jaspers and L. Roelants.
Gent, Belgium, European Aquaculture Society. 24.
Geurden, I., N. Charlon, D. Marion and P. Bergot (1997a). "Influence of
purified soybean phospholipids on early development of common carp." Aquaculture
international 5: 137-149.
Geurden, I., P. Coutteau and P. Sorgeloos (1997b). "Effect of a dietary
phospholipid supplementation on growth and fatty acid composition of European sea
bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.) and turbot (Scophthalmus maximus L.) juveniles from
weaning onwards." Fish Physiol Biochem 16: 259-272.
Gisbert, E., L. Villeneuve, J. L. Zambonino-Infante, P. Quazuguel and C. L.
Cahu (2005). ‘‘Dietary phospholipids are more efficient than neutral lipids for long-
chain polyunsaturated fatty acid supply in European sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax
larval development.’’ Lipids 40: 609-618.
Gibbs, V. K., S. A. Watts, A. L. Lawrence and J. M. Lawrence (2009). "Dietary
phospholipids affect growth and production of juvenile sea urchin Lytechinus
variegatus." Aquaculture 292(1-2): 95-103.
Gjedrem T. (1997). ‘‘Flesh quality improvement in fish through breeding.’’
Aquacult Int 5: 197–206.
Gong, H., A.L. Lawrence, D.H. Jiang, F. Castille and D.M. Gatlin III (2000).
‘‘Lipid nutrition of juvenile Litopenaeus vannamei I. Dietary cholesterol and de-oiled
soy lecithin requirement and their interaction.’’ Aquaculture 190: 305–324.
González-Félix, M. L., D. M. Gatlin III, A. L. Lawrence and M. Perez-
Velazquez (2002). "Effect of dietary phospholipid on essential fatty acid requirements
and tissue lipid composition of Litopenaeus vannamei juveniles." Aquaculture 207:
151-167.
González-Quirós, R., J. Del Árbola, M.M. García-Pachecoa, A. J. Silva-
García, J. M. Naranjoa, B. Morales-Ninc (2011). ‘‘Life-history of the meagre
Argyrosomus regius in the Gulf of Cádiz (SW Iberian Peninsula).’’ Fisheries
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
51
Research 109: 140–149.
Gorjão, R., A. K. Azevedo-Martins, H. G. Rodrigues, F. Abdulkader, M.
Arcisio-Miranda, J. Procopio and R. Curi (2009). "Comparative effects of DHA and
EPA on cell function." Pharmacol Ther 122(1): 56-64.
Halliwell B., Chirico S. (1993). ‘‘Lipid peroxidation: its mechanism,
measurement, and significance.’’ American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 57(5): 715-
725.
Hamza, N., M. Mhetli, I. B. Khemis, C. Cahu and P. Kestemont (2008). "Effect
of dietary phospholipid levels on performance, enzyme activities and fatty acid
composition of pikeperch (Sander lucioperca) larvae." Aquaculture 275(1-4): 274-
282.
Harada, K., (1987). ‘‘Relationships between structure and feeding attraction
activity of certain t-amino acids and lecithin in aquatic animals.’’ Nippon Suisan
Gakkaishi 53: 2243-2247.
Harel, M., S. Ozkizilcik, E. Lund, P. Behrens and A. R. Place (1999).
"Enhanced absorption of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n-3) in artemia nauplii
using a dietary combination of DHA-rich phospholipids and DHA-sodium salts."
Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B 124: 169-176.
Henderson, R. J. and J. R. Sargent (1985). ‘‘Fatty acid metabolism in fish. In
Nutrition and Feeding in Fish’’ (C. B. Cowey, A. M. Mackie & J. G. Bell, eds.),
London: Academic Press 349-364.
Hermes-Lima M., W. G. Willmore and K. B. Storey (1995). ‘‘Quantification of
lipid peroxidation in tissue extracts based on Fe(III)xylenol orange complex
formation.’’ Free Radical Biology and Medicine 19: 271-280.
Hillestad, M., F. Johnsen, E. Austreng and T. Asgard (1998). ‘‘Long-term
effects of dietary fat level and feeding rate on growth, feed utiliz- ation and carcass
quality of Atlantic salmon.’’ Aquacult Nutr 4: 89–97.
Huang, S.S.Y., A. N. Oo, D. A. Higgs, C. J. Brauner, S. Satoh (2007). ‘‘Effect
of dietary canola oil level on the growth performance and fatty acid composition of
juvenile red sea bream, Pagrus major.’’ Aquaculture 271: 420–431.
Ibeas C., C. Rodríguez, P. Badía, J. R. Cejas, F. J. Santamaría, A. Lorenzo
(2000). ‘‘Efficacy of dietary methyl esters of n-3 HUFA vs. triacylglycerols of n-3
HUFA by gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) juveniles.’’ Aquaculture 190 (1-4):
273-287
Izquierdo, M.S., W. Koven (2011). ‘‘Lipids.’’ In: Larval Fish Nutrition (Holt
G.J., ed.). Johh Wiley & Sons, Inc., 47–81.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
52
Ji H., Li J., Liu P. (2011). ‘‘Regulation of growth performance and lipid
metabolism by dietary n-3 highly unsaturated fatty acids in juvenile grass carp,
Ctenopharyngodon idellus.’’ Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B 159: 49-56.
Jiménez M.T., Pastor E., Grau A., Alconchel J.I., Cárdenas S. (2005).
‘‘Revisión sobre el cultivo de esciénidos en el mundo y presentación del Plan
nacional de Cría de corvina (Argyrosomus regius).’’ Actas del X Congreso Nacional
de Acuicultura, Valencia, 396–397.
Jingjing, M., W. Jiying, Z. Derui, H. Tiantian, S. Jianzhen, S. Yongzhi, Z.
Limin (2014). ‘‘Estimation of optimum docosahexaenoic to eicosapentaenoic acid
ratio (DHA/EPA) for juvenile starry flounder, Platichthys stellatus.’’ Aquaculture 433:
105-114.
Kanazawa, A., S.-I. Teshima and M. Sakamoto (1985). "Effect of dietary
lipids, fatty acids, and phospholipids on growth and survival of prawn (Penaeus
Japonicus) larvae." Aquaculture 50: 39-49.
Kanazawa, A., (1993). ‘‘Essential phospholipids of fish and crustaceans.’’ In:
Fish Nutrition in Practice, Biarritr (France) (Kaushik, S.J., Luquet, P., eds.). June 24-
27. Edn. INRA, Paris 1993, Les Colloques nr. 61, 519-530.
Kanazawa, A. (1997). "Effects of docosahexaenoic acid and phospholipids on
stress tolerance of fish." Aquaculture 155: 129- 134.
Kaushik, S.J., Medale, F., (1994). ‘‘Energy requirements, utilization and
dietary supply to salmonids.’’ Aquaculture 124: 81–97.
King, M.F., L. C. Boyd and B. W. Sheldon (1992). ‘‘Effects of phospholipids
on lipid oxidation of a salmon oil model system.’’ J. Am. Oil Chem. Sot. 69: 237-242.
Kjær, M.A., M. Todorčević, B. E. Torstensen, A. Vegusdal, B. Ruyter (2008).
‘‘Dietary n-3 HUFA affects mitochondrial fatty acid beta-oxidation capacity and
susceptibility to oxidative stress in Atlantic salmon.’’ Lipids 43: 813–827.
Knight, J. A., R. K. Pieper, L. McClellan (1988). ‘‘Specificity of the
thiobarbituric acid reaction: its use in studies of lipid peroxidation.’’ Clin. Chem. 34:
2433–2438.
Kontara, E. K. M., P. Coutteau and P. Sorgeloos (1997). "Effect of dietary
phospholipid on requirements for and incorporation of n - 3 highly unsaturated fatty
acids in postlarval Penaeus japonicus Bate." Aquaculture 158: 305-320.
Kovena, W. M., A. Tandler, D. Sklanb and G. W. Kissil (1993). "The
association of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids in the main
phospholipids of different-age Sparus aurata larvae with growth." Aquaculture 116:
71-82.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
53
Koven, W., Y. Barr, S. Lutzky, I. Ben-Atia, R. Weiss, M. Harel, P. Behrens, A.
Tandler (2001) ‘‘The efect of dietaryarachidonic acid (20:4n-6) on growth, survival
and resistance to handling stress in gilthead seabream Sparus aurata larvae.’’
Aquaculture 193:107-122.
Kullenberg, D., L. A. Taylor, M. Schneider and U. Massing (2012). "Health
effects of dietary phospholipids." Lipids Health Dis 11: 3.
Lall, S. P. (2000). ‘‘Nutrition and health of fish’’. In: Avances en Nutrición
Acuícola V. Memorias del V Simposium Internacional de Nutrición Acuícola. Cruz –
(Suárez, L.E., Ricque-Marie, D., Tapia-Salazar, M., Olvera-Novoa, M.A. and Civera-
Cerecedo, R., eds.). Nutrition and health of fish, 19-22.
Lall, S.P., (2002). ‘‘The minerals’’, In: Fish Nutrition, 3rd ed. (Halver, J.E.,
Hardy, R.W., eds.). Academic Press, San Diego, 259–308.
Li, X., J. Wang, T. Han, S. Hu, Y. Jiang and C. Wang (2014). "Effect of dietary
phospholipids levels and sources on growth performance, fatty acid composition of
the juvenile swimming crab, Portunus trituberculatus." Aquaculture 430: 166-172.
Li, Y., J. Gao and S. Huang (2015). "Effects of different dietary phospholipid
levels on growth performance, fatty acid composition, PPAR gene expressions and
antioxidant responses of blunt snout bream Megalobrama amblycephala fingerlings."
Fish Physiol Biochem 41(2): 423-436.
Livingstone, D.R., (2001). ‘’Contaminant-stimulated reactive oxygen species
production and oxidative damage in aquatic organisms.’’ Mar. Pollut. Bull. 42: 656–
666.
López, L. M., E. Durazo, M. T. Viana, M. Drawbridge and D. P. Bureau
(2009). "Effect of dietary lipid levels on performance, body composition and fatty acid
profile of juvenile white seabass, Atractoscion nobilis." Aquaculture 289(1-2): 101-
105.
Lund, I., S. J. Steenfeldt and B. W. Hansen (2007). "Effect of dietary
arachidonic acid, eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid on survival,
growth and pigmentation in larvae of common sole (Solea solea L.)." Aquaculture
273(4): 532-544.
Luo, Z., Liu, Y.J., Mai, K.S., Tian, X.Y., Liu, D.H., Tan, X.Y., Lin, H.Z., (2005).
‘‘Effect of dietary lipid level on growth performance, feed utilization and body
composition of grouper Epinephelus coioides juveniles fed isonitrogenous diets in
floating netcages.’’ Aquac. Int. 13: 257–269.
Ma, J., J. Wang, D. Zhang, T. Hao, J. Sun, Y. Sun and L. Zhang (2014).
"Estimation of optimum docosahexaenoic to eicosapentaenoic acid ratio (DHA/EPA)
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
54
for juvenile starry flounder, Platichthys stellatus." Aquaculture 433: 105-114.
Martínez-Álvarez, R. M., A. E. Morales and A. Sanz (2005). "Antioxidant
Defenses in Fish: Biotic and Abiotic Factors." Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
15(1-2): 75-88.
Martino, R.C., Cyrino, J.P., Portz, L., Trugo, L.C., (2002). ‘‘Effect of dietary
lipid level on nutritional performance of the surubim, Pseudoplatystoma coruscans.’’
Aquaculture 209: 209–218
Monfort, M. C. (2010). ‘‘Present market situation and prospects of meagre
(Argyrosomus regius), as an emerging species in mediterranean aquaculture.’’
Studies and Reviews, General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean No. 89.
Roma: FAO.
Monroig, Ó., D. R. Tocher, F. Hontoria and J. C. Navarro (2013). "Functional
characterisation of a Fads2 fatty acyl desaturase with Δ6/Δ8 activity and an Elovl5
with C16, C18 and C20 elongase activity in the anadromous teleost meagre
(Argyrosomus regius)." Aquaculture 412-413: 14-22.
Morais, S., M. J. Caballero, L. E. Conceição, M. S. Izquierdo and M. T. Dinis
(2006). "Dietary neutral lipid level and source in Senegalese sole (Solea
senegalensis) larvae: effect on growth, lipid metabolism and digestive capacity."
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 144(1): 57-69.
Morais, S., L. E. C. Conceição, I. Rønnestad, W. Koven, C. Cahu, J. L.
Zambonino Infante and M. T. Dinis (2007). "Dietary neutral lipid level and source in
marine fish larvae: Effects on digestive physiology and food intake." Aquaculture
268(1-4): 106-122.
Morais, S., G. Mourente, A. Ortega, J. A. Tocher and D. R. Tocher (2011).
"Expression of fatty acyl desaturase and elongase genes, and evolution of DHA:EPA
ratio during development of unfed larvae of Atlantic bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus
L.)." Aquaculture 313(1-4): 129-139.
Morais, S., G. Mourente, A. Martinez, N. Gras and D. R. Tocher (2015).
"Docosahexaenoic acid biosynthesis via fatty acyl elongase and Delta4-desaturase
and its modulation by dietary lipid level and fatty acid composition in a marine
vertebrate." Biochim Biophys Acta 1851(5): 588-597.
Morales, A. E., Pérez-Jiménez, A., Hidalgo, M. C., Abellán, E., Cardenete, G.
(2004). ‘‘Oxidative stress and antioxidant defenses after prolonged starvation in
Dentex dentex liver.’’ Comp. Biochem. Physiol. C. 139: 153–161.
Morton, K. M., D. Blyth, N. Bourne, S. Irvin and B. D. Glencross (2014).
"Effect of ration level and dietary docosahexaenoic acid content on the requirements
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
55
for long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acids by juvenile barramundi (Lates calcarifer)."
Aquaculture 433: 164-172.
Mourente, G., A. Rodriguez, D. R. Tocher and J. R. Sargent (1993). "Effects
of dietary docosahexaenoic acid (DHA; 22:6n-3) on lipid and fatty acid compositions
and growth in gilthead sea bream (Sparus aurata L.) larvae during first feeding."
Aquaculture 112: 79-98.
Mourente, G., E. Díaz-Salvago, J. G. Bell and D. R. Tocher (2002).
‘‘Increased activities of hepatic antioxidant defence enzymes in juvenile gilthead sea
bream (Sparus aurata L.) fed dietary oxidized oil: attenuation by dietary vitamin E.’’
Aquaculture 214: 343-361.
Mourente, G. (2003). ‘‘Accumulation of DHA (docosahexaenoic acid; 22:6n-3)
in larval and juvenile brain.’’ In: Proceedings of the 26th Annual Larval Fish
Conference (Browman H.I. and Skiftesvik A.B., eds.) Bergen, Norway.
Mylonas, C. C., N. Mitrizakis, I. Sigelaki, M. Papadaki (2011). ‘‘Spawning
kinetics of individual female meagre (Argyrosomus regius) after treatment with
GnRHa implants.’’ Indian Journal of Science and Technology 4: 232–233.
Narayan, B., K. Miyashita and M. Hosakawa (2006). "Physiological Effects of
Eicosapentaenoic Acid (EPA) and Docosahexaenoic Acid (DHA) - A Review." Food
Reviews International 22(3): 291-307.
Nelson J. S. (1994). ‘‘Fishes of the world’’ (3rd edi). New York: Wiley.
Nevejan, N., I. Saez, G. Gajardo and P. Sorgeloos (2003). "Supplementation
of EPA and DHA emulsions to a Dunaliella tertiolecta diet: effect on growth and lipid
composition of scallop larvae, Argopecten purpuratus (Lamarck, 1819)." Aquaculture
217: 613–632.
Niu, J., Y. J. Liu, L. X. Tian, K. S. Mai, H. Z. Lin, X. Chen, H. J. Yang and G.
Y. Liang (2011). "Influence of dietary phospholipids level on growth performance,
body composition and lipid class of early postlarval Litopenaeus vannamei."
Aquaculture Nutrition 17(2): 615-621.
NRC, (2011). ‘‘Nutrient Requirements of Fish and Shrimp.’’ The National
Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.
Oberg, E. W. and L. A. Fuiman (2015). "Linking fatty acids in the diet and
tissues to quality of larval southern flounder (Paralichthys lethostigma)." Journal of
Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 467: 7-15.
Okland, H. M., I. S. Stoknes, J. F. Remme, M. Kjerstad and M. Synnes
(2005). "Proximate composition, fatty acid and lipid class composition of the muscle
from deep-sea teleosts and elasmobranchs." Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
56
Biol 140(3): 437-443.
Olivotto, I., M. Di Stefano, S. Rosetti, L. Cossignani, A. Pugnaloni, F.
Giantomassi and O. Carnevali (2011). "Live prey enrichment, with particular
emphasis on HUFAs, as limiting factor in false percula clownfish (Amphiprion
ocellaris, Pomacentridae) larval development and metamorphosis: molecular and
biochemical implications." Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol 159(3): 207-
218.
Olsen, R. E. and R. J. Henderson (1997). "Muscle fatty acid composition and
oxidative stress indices of Arctic charr, Salvelinus alpinus (L.), in relation to dietary
polyunsaturated fatty acid levels and temperature." Aquaculture Nutrition 3: 227-238.
Olsen, R. E., E. Løvaas and Ø. Lie (1999). "The influence of temperature,
dietary polyunsaturated fatty acids, l-tocopherol and spermine on fatty acid
composition and indices of oxidative stress in juvenile Arctic char, Salvelinus alpinus
(L.)." Fish Physiol Biochem 20: 13-29.
Om, A. D., T. Umino, H. Nakagawa, T. Sasaki, K. Okada, M. Asano and A.
Nakagawa (2001). "The effects of dietary EPA and DHA fortification on lipolysis
activity and physiological function in juvenile black sea bream Acanthopagrus
schlegeli (Bleeker)." Aquaculture Research 32(1): 255-262.
Østbye, T.-K., M. A. Kjær, A. M. B. Rørå, B. Torstensen, B. Ruyter (2009).
‘‘High n-3 HUFA levels in the diet of Atlantic salmon affect muscle and mitochondrial
membrane lipids and their susceptibility to oxidative stress.’’ Aquaculture Nutritrion
17(2): 177-190.
Owen J. M., J.A. Adron, C. Middleton, C. B. Cowey (1975). ‘‘Elongation and
desaturation of dietary fatty acids in turbot (Scophthalmus maximus) and rainbow
trout (Salmo gairdneri).’’ Lipids 10: 528-531.
Park, Y., S. Nam, H.-J. Yi, H.-J. Hong, M. Lee (2009). ‘‘Dietary n-3
polyunsaturated fatty acids increase oxidative stress in rats with intracerebral
hemorrhagic stroke.’’ Nutrition Research 29: 812–818
Pérez-Jiménez, A., M. C. Hidalgo, A. E. Morales, M. Arizcun, E. Abellán, G.
Cardenete (2009). ‘‘Antioxidant enzymatic defenses and oxidative damage in Dentex
dentex fed on different dietary macronutrient levels.’’ Comparative Biochemistry and
Physiology C: Toxicology & Pharmacology 150: 537-545.
Poli, B. M., G. Parisi, G. Zampacavallo, F. Iurzan, M. Mecatti, P. Lupi, A.
Bonelli (2003). ‘‘Preliminary results on quality and quality changes in reared meagre
(Argyrosomus regius): body and fillet traits and freshness changes in refrigerated
commercial size fish.’’ Aquaculture International 11: 301–311
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
57
Popović, T., S. Borozan, A. Arsić, J. D. Martačić, S. de Luka and M. Glibetić
(2013). "Correlation between oxidative stress and fatty acids profiles in plasma
phospholipids after fish oil treatment in aged male rats." Free Radical Biology and
Medicine 65: S43.
Postle, A. D. (2005). ‘‘Composition and Role of Phospholipids.’’ Lipids. E. Ltd.
Pousão-Ferreira, P., S. Castanho, L. Ribeiro, J. Coutinho, N. M. Bandarra, A.
C. Mendes (2013). ‘‘Larval rearing protocols for meagre Argyrosomus regius.’’ LARVI
’13 – Fish & Shellfish Larviculture Symposium. C.I. Hendry. Laboratory of
Aquaculture & Artemia Reference Center, Ghent University, Belgium
Quéméner L., Suquet M., Mero D., Gaignon J.-L. (2002). ‘‘Selection method
of new candidates for finfish aquaculture: the case of the French Atlantic, the
Channel and the North Sea coasts.’’ Aquatic Living Resources 15: 293–302.
Quéro, J. C. and J. Vayne (1987). ‘‘Le maigre, Argyrosomus regius (Asso,
1801) du golfe de Gascogne et des eaux plus septentrionales.’’ Revue des Travaux
de l’ Institut des Pêches Maritimes, 49: 35-66
Rahimnejad, S., I. Bang, J.-Y. Park, A. Sade, J. Choi, S.-M. Lee (2015).
‘‘Effects of dietary protein and lipid levels on growth performance, feed utilization and
body composition of juvenile hybrid grouper, Epinephelus fuscoguttatus E.
lanceolatus.’’ Aquaculture 446: 283–289
Rezek, T. C., W. O. Watanabe, M. Harel and P. J. Seaton (2010). "Effects of
dietary docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3) and arachidonic acid (20:4n-6) on the
growth, survival, stress resistance and fatty acid composition in black sea bass
Centropristis striata (Linnaeus 1758) larvae." Aquaculture Research 41(9): 1302-
1314.
Riediger, N. D., R. A. Othman, M. Suh and M. H. Moghadasian (2009). "A
systemic review of the roles of n-3 fatty acids in health and disease." J Am Diet
Assoc 109(4): 668-679.
Rodríguez, C., J. A. Pérez, P. Badía, M. S. Izquierdo, H. Fernández-Palacios
and A. L. Hernández (1998). "The n-3 highly unsaturated fatty acids requirements of
gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata L.) larvae when using an appropriate DHA/EPA
ratio in the diet." Aquaculture 169: 9-23.
Rodríguez-Rúa, A., S. García-Mesa, M. García-Gallego, M. D. Suárez, S.
Cárdenas (2009). ‘‘Efectos de ayuno-realimentación y tamaño de la ración en
aspectos morfométricos y de composición en la corvina.’’ In: XII Congreso Nacional
de Acuicultura. (Beaz D., Villarroel M., Cárdenas S., eds.). Madrid, España.
Rowley, A. F., J. Knight, P. Lloyd-Evans, J. W. Holland and P. J. Vickers
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
58
(1995). "Eicosanoids and their role in immune modulation in fish-a brief overview."
Fish & Shellfish Immunology 5: 549-567.
Rueda-Jasso, R., L. C. G. Conceicao, J. Dias, W. De Coen, E. Gomes, J. F.
Rees, F. Soares, M. T. Dinis and P. Sorgeloos (2004). ‘‘Effect of dietary non-protein
energy levels on condition and oxidative status of Senegalese sole (Solea
senegalensis) juveniles’’. Aquaculture 231: 417–433.
Saavedra, M., T. G. Pereira, A. Grade, M. Barbeiro, P. Pousão-Ferreira, H.
Quental-Ferreira, M. L. Nunes, N. Bandarra, A Gonçalves (2015) ‘‘Farmed meagre,
Argyrosomus regius of three different sizes: what are the differences in flesh quality
and muscle cellularity?’’ International Journal of Food Science and Technology 50:
1311–1316
Samuelsson, B. (1987). "An Elucidation of the Arachidonic Acid Cascade
Discovery of Prostaglandins, Thromboxane and Leukotrienes." Drugs 33(1): 2-9.
Sargent J. R., R. J. Henderson and D. R. Tocher (1989). ‘‘The lipids.’’ In: Fish
Nutrition, 2nd ed. (J. E. Halver, ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, CA, USA, 154-
219.
Sargent, J., L. McEvoy and G. Bell (1997). "Requirements, presentation
polyunsaturated fatty acids larval feeds and sources of in marine fish." Aquaculture
155: 117-127.
Sargent, J., G. Bell, L. McEvoy, D. Tocher and A. Estevez (1999). "Recent
developments in the essential fatty acid nutrition of fish." Aquaculture 177: 191-199.
Sargent, J., L. McEvoy, A. Estevez, Gordon Bell, M. Bell, J. Henderson and
D. Tocher (1999). "Lipid nutrition of marine fish during early development: current
status and future directions." Aquaculture 179: 217-229.
Schmitz, G., J. Ecker (2007). ‘‘The opposing effects of n-3 and n-6 fatty acids-
Review’’ Lipid Research 47: 147–155
Schuchardt, D., H. Fernández-Palacios, J. Roo, C. M. Hernández-Cruz
(2007). ‘‘Estabulación y mantenimiento de un stock de reproductores de corvina
(Argyrosomus regius, Asso, 1801).’’ In Libro de Actas Toma II XI Congreso Nacional
de Acuicultura, 24–28 Septiembre, Vigo. Pontevedra: Graficas Salnes SL, 727–730.
Shearer, K.D., 1994. ‘‘Factors affecting the proximate composition of cultured
fishes with emphasis on salmonids.’’ Aquaculture 119: 63–88.
Shimazawa, M., Y. Nakajima, Y. Mashima and H. Hara (2009).
"Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) has neuroprotective effects against oxidative stress in
retinal ganglion cells." Brain Res 1251: 269-275.
Shoji, H., C. Franke, H. Demmelmair and B. Koletzko (2009). "Effect of
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
59
docosahexaenoic acid on oxidative stress in placental trophoblast cells." Early Hum
Dev 85(7): 433-437.
Simopoulos, A. P. (1991). "Omega-3 fatty acids in health and disease and in
growth and development." Am J Clin Nutr 54: 438-463.
Smith, W. L. and R. C. Murphy (2002). ‘‘The eicosanoids: cyclooxygenase,
lipoxygenase, and epoxygenase pathways. Biochemistry of Lipids. Lipoproteins and
Membranes. D. E. Vance and J. E. Vance. Elsevier Science B.V.
Soares, F., L. Ribeiro, M. Gamboa, S. Duarte, A. C. Mendes, S. Castanho,
M. Barata, T. M. Lourenço, P. Pousão-Ferreira (2015). ‘‘Comparative analysis on
natural spawning of F1 meagre, Argyrosomus regius, with wild broodstock spawns in
Portugal’’ Fish Physiol Biochem DOI 10.1007/s10695-015-0103-4
Stéphan, G., Guillaume, J., Lamour, F. (1995). ‘‘Lipid peroxidation in turbot
(Scophthalmus maximus) tissue: effect of dietary vitamin E and dietary n−6 or n−3
polyunsaturated fatty acids.’’ Aquaculture 130: 251–268.
Storey, K.B. (1996). ‘‘Oxidative stress: animal adaptations in nature.’’ Braz. J.
Med. Biol. Res. 29: 1715–1733.
Sui, L., M. Wille, Y. Cheng and P. Sorgeloos (2007). "The effect of dietary n-3
HUFA levels and DHA/EPA ratios on growth, survival and osmotic stress tolerance of
Chinese mitten crab Eriocheir sinensis larvae." Aquaculture 273(1): 139-150.
Takeuchi T., T. Watanabe (1977). ‘‘Requirement of carp for essential fatty
acids.’’ Bulletin of the Japanese Society of Scientific Fisheries 43: 541-551
Teshima, S., A. S. Kanazawa, Y. Kakuta, (1986). ‘‘Effects of dietary
phospholipids on growth and body composition of the juvenile prawn.’’ Bull. Jpn. Soc.
Sci. Fish 52: 155–158.
Tocher D. R., E. A. Bendiksen, P. J. Campbell and J. G. Bell (2008). ‘‘The
role of phospholipids in nutrition and metabolism of teleost fish.’’ Aquaculture 280:
21-34.
Tocher, D. R. (2003). ‘‘Metabolism and Functions of Lipids and Fatty Acids in
Teleost Fish.’’ Fisheries Science 11(2): 107-184
Tocher, D. R., (1995). ‘‘Glycerophospholipid metabolism.’’ In: Biochemistry
and Molecular Biology of Fishes, 119-157
Tocher, D. R., E. Å. Bendiksen, P. J. Campbell and J. G. Bell (2008). "The
role of phospholipids in nutrition and metabolism of teleost fish." Aquaculture 280(1-
4): 21-34.
Tocher, D. R. (2010). "Fatty acid requirements in ontogeny of marine and
freshwater fish." Aquaculture Research 41(5): 717-732.
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
60
Todorcevic, M., M. A. Kjaer, N. Djakovic, A. Vegusdal, B. E. Torstensen and
B. Ruyter (2009). "N-3 HUFAs affect fat deposition, susceptibility to oxidative stress,
and apoptosis in Atlantic salmon visceral adipose tissue." Comp Biochem Physiol B
Biochem Mol Biol 152(2): 135-143.
Todorcevic, M., S. Skugor and B. Ruyter (2010). "Alterations in oxidative
stress status modulate terminal differentiation in Atlantic salmon adipocytes
cultivated in media rich in n-3 fatty acids." Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol
Biol 156(4): 309-318.
Tsangaris, C., M. Vergolyas, E. Fountoulaki, K. Nizheradze (2011).
‘‘Oxidative stress and genotoxicity biomarkers responses in Grey Mullet (Mugil
cephalus) from a polluted environment in Saronikos Gulf, Greece.’’ Arch. Environ.
Contam. Toxicol. 61: 482–490.
Turchini, G. M., B. E. Torstensen, W. K. Ng, (2009). ‘‘Fish oil replacement in
finfish nutrition.’’ Rev Aquac 1: 10–57.
Vagner, M., B. Montgolfier, J.-M. Sévigny, R. Tremblay and C. Audet (2014).
"Effects of algae-enriched rotifers on winter flounder (Pseudopleuronectes
americanus) gene expression during metamorphosis." Marine Biology 161: 985-999.
Villalta, M., A. Estévez, M. P. Bransden and J. G. Bell (2005). "The effect of
graded concentrations of dietary DHA on growth, survival and tissue fatty acid profile
of Senegal sole (Solea senegalensis) larvae during the Artemia feeding period."
Aquaculture 249(1-4): 353-365.
Vizcaíno-Ochoa, V., J. P. Lazo, B. Barón-Sevilla and M. A. Drawbridge
(2010). "The effect of dietary docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) on growth, survival and
pigmentation of California halibut Paralichthys californicus larvae (Ayres, 1810)."
Aquaculture 302(3-4): 228-234.
Wang, J.T., Liu, Y.J., Tian, L.X.,Mai, K.S., Du, Z.Y.,Wang, Y., Yang, H.J.,
(2005). ‘‘Effect of dietary lipid level on growth performance, lipid deposition, hepatic
lipogenesis in juvenile cobia (Rachycentron canadum).’’ Aquaculture 249: 439–447.
Watanabe T. (1982). ‘‘Lipid nutrition in fish.’’ Comp Biochem Physiol B 73(1):
3-15.
Wold, P.-A., K. Hoehne-Reitan, C. L. Cahu, J. Z. Infante, J. Rainuzzo and E.
Kjørsvik (2007). "Phospholipids vs. neutral lipids: Effects on digestive enzymes in
Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) larvae." Aquaculture 272(1-4): 502-513.
Wu, X., Y. Cheng, L. Sui, C. Zeng, P. C. Southgate and X. Yang (2007).
"Effect of dietary supplementation of phospholipids and highly unsaturated fatty acids
on reproductive performance and offspring quality of Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir
FCUP Effect of dietary phospholipids and docosahexaenoic acid in growth performance, fatty acid
composition and oxidative stress Argyrosomus regius
61
sinensis (H. Milne-Edwards), female broodstock." Aquaculture 273(4): 602-613.
Wu, X., Z. Wang, Y. X. Cheng, C. Zeng, X. Yang and J. Lu (2011). "Effects of
dietary phospholipids and highly unsaturated fatty acids on the precocity, survival,
growth and hepatic lipid composition of juvenile Chinese mitten crab, Eriocheir
sinensis (H. Milne-Edwards)." Aquaculture Research 42(3): 457-468.
Yaqoob, P. and P. C. Calder (2007). "Fatty acids and immune function: new
insights into mechanisms." Br J Nutr 98(1): 41-45.
Zhao, J., Q. Ai, K. Mai, R. Zuo and Y. Luo (2013). "Effects of dietary
phospholipids on survival, growth, digestive enzymes and stress resistance of large
yellow croaker, Larmichthys crocea larvae." Aquaculture 410-411: 122-128.