+ All Categories
Home > Documents > DIST_03_SS

DIST_03_SS

Date post: 20-Nov-2015
Category:
Upload: nathanian
View: 215 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Column Design
Popular Tags:
32
1 Overall Column Design Goals Maximize separation Minimize manufacturing and installation cost Minimize energy operating cost Minimize maintenance cost Provide operating flexibility
Transcript
  • *Overall Column Design Goals

    Maximize separation

    Minimize manufacturing and installation cost

    Minimize energy operating cost

    Minimize maintenance cost

    Provide operating flexibility

  • *Staged Column Internals Terminology

    Tray a horizontal plate which supports the vapor-liquid mixture and serves as an equilibrium stage.

    Downcomer an opening in the tray which allows the liquid to flow down the column.

    Weir a vertical plate or dam at the downcomer to provide a given vapor-liquid mixture depth on the tray.

  • Lecture 19*Trayed Distillation Column Internals

    Lecture 19

  • *Tray Types

    Sieve or Perforated simply a tray with vapor holes

    Bubble Cap a cap placed over the trays vapor holes

    Valve a valve placed over the trays vapor holes

  • *Tray Design Goal Maximize Column Efficiency

    Enhance vapor-liquid mixing

    Maintain optimum vapor flow

    Maintain optimum liquid depth

    Minimize pressure drop

    Prevent fouling

  • *Sieve Tray

  • *Perforated Tray

  • Lecture 19*Valve and Valve Tray

    Lecture 19

  • Lecture 19*Vapor/Liquid Flow Paths

    Lecture 19

  • *Bubble Cap Close Up

  • Lecture 19*Vapor Flow Path

    Lecture 19

  • Lecture 19*Liquid Flow Paths Passes

    Lecture 19

  • *Two-Phase Transport DependenciesLiquidLiquid-phase mixing (fluid dynamics)Liquid-phase droplet size and size distribution (surface tension)Liquid-phase mass transport properties (diffusivity)

    VaporGas-phase mixing (fluid dynamics)Gas-phase bubble coalescence and breakup (stability)Gas-phase bubble rise velocity (density)Gas-phase bubble size and size distribution (surface tension)Gas-phase transport properties (diffusivity)

    Liquid-Vapor Gas-liquid-phase interfacial area (contact area)Gas-liquid-phase interfacial mass transport properties (solubility)

    Note that all of these properties as well as other transport properties, e.g., thermal interact to yield the overall system behavior

  • *Vapor-Liquid Flow Regimes

  • *Flow Regimes

    Bubble RegimeOccurs at low gas flow ratesDistinct vapor bubbles rising through continuous liquid phasePoor mixing and liquid-vapor contactLow efficiency

    Froth RegimeOccurs at medium gas flow ratesLiquid phase is continuous with large, pulsating vapor voidsLiquid phase is well mixed and vapor is notHigh efficiency for liquid-phase, mass-transfer limited systemMost common regime for operation

  • *Flow RegimesSpray RegimeOccurs at high vapor flow rates and low liquid depths (low weir)Vapor phase is continuous and liquid forms small dropletsVapor is well mixed and liquid is notLow efficiency for liquid-phase, mass-transfer limited systemEmulsion RegimeOccurs at high liquid ratesVapor-phase bubbles emulsifyLiquid phase is not well mixed Low efficiency for liquid-phase, mass-transfer limited systemHigh efficiency for vapor-phase, mass-transfer limited systemFoam RegimeOccurs at low to medium flow rates where vapor bubble coalescence (a property of the components) is hinderedLiquid phase is continuous while large vapor bubbles formHigh efficiency for vapor-liquid-phase, mass-transfer limited systemsLeads to entrainment of liquid between stages

  • *What to Avoid in the Column Flooding, Weeping and Foaming

    Flooding occurs at high vapor flow rates excessive entrainment of liquid overcomes the downcomer capacity and the column floods or large liquid flow rates.

    Weeping occurs at low vapor flow rates liquid flows or pulses back through the tray vapor openings.

    Foaming occurs when the components form a stable foam efficiency of the column drops and the column may flood.

  • *Operating Ranges Vapor vs. Liquid Flow Rates

  • *Overall Efficiency

    The overall efficiency is defined asEo = Nequil /Nactual

    The vapor flow rate affects the column operating parameters including entrainment, flooding, weeping and the flow regime; thus, in many systems, the overall efficiency is a strong function of vapor flow rate

  • *Operating RangesEfficiency vs. Vapor Flow Rate

  • *Column (Tray) DiameterThe minimum column diameter for trayed columns is typically 0.75 m; otherwise, packed columns are used.

    The maximum diameter of the column can be quite large up to 5 m although it may be decided to operate 2 or more separate columns in place of an otherwise large diameter single column.

    As the column diameter decreases, the vapor velocity increases for a given vapor flow rate.

    The minimum column diameter is based upon the maximum vapor velocity that causes excessive entrainment and flooding.

  • *Column (Tray) Diameter

    The maximum column diameter is based upon maintaining a high enough velocity to prevent excess weeping.

    The operating vapor velocity, and hence actual column diameter, is specified as a fraction of the flooding vapor velocity typically 0.65 to 0.90.

    The final consideration is column cost a larger diameter column is more expensive than a smaller diameter column, although economies of scale enter into the cost.

  • *Other Factors

    The total area of the tray hole openings:Typically range from 2 mm to 12 mmBased upon vapor flow per traySized to prevent weeping, minimize pressure drop, and reduce entrainment at a given vapor velocity.

    The layout of the tray holes:Different patterns availableLayout chosen to ensure an even and well mixed flow of vapor and liquid across the tray so that there are no dry spots and bypassing of vapor on the tray that would reduce efficiency.

  • *Other Factors

    The liquid depth on the trays, hence, the weir height:Typically range from 12 to 75 cmBased upon vapor and liquid flow per traySized to prevent dry spots, increase liquid-vapor contact time, and to prevent a spray regime that reduces efficiency

    The total area & height of the downcomer openings per tray:Based on the passes and the liquid residence time in the downcomer, typically 3 to 7 seconds to allow disengagement of the vapor from the liquid in the downcomer to prevent flooding.The downcomer height should be at least the height of the tray spacing. Additional passes are chosen to prevent excessive loading of the downcomers.

  • *And More Factors

    The tray spacing:Typically 0.15 to 1 m in small diameter columns (< 6m) with larger spacing in large diameter columns to allow maintenance access.Based upon the liquid disengagment zone required between the trays to avoid entrainment and flooding.The tray spacing and number of trays, plus the inlet and outlet sections, determine the overall column height.

  • *And Even More Factors

    The tendency of the liquid-vapor mixture to foam or a foaming factor that affects the tray spacing for disengagement and downcomer height, as well as the efficiency.

    The type of tray sieve, bubble cap, or tray which will affect the pressure drop, entrainment, flooding, weeping, and efficiency characteristics, as well as the cost, of the column.

  • *Tray Comparison The turndown ratio is the ratio of the maximum vapor flow rate (flooding) to minimum vapor flow rate (excessive weeping).

  • *Fairs Method Capacity Factor

    Fairs Method

    The column diameter is important to prevent excessive entrainment, low column efficiency, and potential flooding. Fairs method estimates the vapor velocity at flooding conditions, uses a rule-of-thumb to determine the operating velocity, and then calculates the column diameter.

    Flooding Vapor Velocity, uflood:

    ft/s

    Eq. (12-7)

    where the s are the densities of the liquid, L, and vapor, v, and the K factor is

    Eq. (12-8)

    where is the surface tension and Csb is the capacity factor, which is a function of the flow parameter, FLV:

    Eq. (12-9)

    where L and V are the mass flow rates of liquid and vapor, respectively.

    One also needs to assume the tray spacing in inches.

    Calculating FLV from Eq. (12-9), one can determine Csb from the Fair correlation, Figure 12-16, p. 387, Wankat.

    Once Csb is obtained, the K factor and then the flooding velocity, uflood, can be calculated from Eqs. (12-8) and (12-7), respectively.

    _1079760901.unknown

    _1079761077.unknown

    _1079759971.unknown

  • *Capacity Factor

  • *Additional Factors

    Additional Corrections:

    Other factors can be incorporated in the K factor used in Eq. (12-7) in addition to Eq. (12-8). These include a foaming factor, CFF, and a tray area factor, CHA:

    CFF = 1.0 for non-foaming systems and CFF < 1.0 for foaming systems.

    CHA is based upon the ratio of the vapor hole area Ah to the tray active area, Aa. The vapor hole area, Ah, is the area open to vapor flow, for example, it is the total area of the holes on a sieve tray. The active tray area is the total tray area less the area of the downcomers leading down from the tray above and down to the tray below:

    for

    for

    _1079763573.unknown

    _1079763663.unknown

    _1079763737.unknown

    _1079763595.unknown

    _1079762480.unknown

  • *Fairs Method Operating Vapor Velocity and Column Diameter

    Operating Velocity, uop:

    The operating vapor velocity is subsequently determined from

    ft/s

    Eq. (12-11)

    where f is the fractional approach to flooding.

    Column Diameter, Dcol:

    Once uop is obtained, the column diameter, Dcol, can be determined from

    ft

    Eq. (12-16)

    where = Ad, uop is in ft/sec and V is the vapor molar flow per hr.

    _1079762252.unknown

    _1079764413.unknown

  • *Column Diameter Some Final NotesSince each stage is at a different operating temperature and the actual vapor flow rate may change substantially throughout the column if CMO is not applicable, the flooding velocity, operating velocity, and required diameter of the column change at each stage.

    One usually calculates all of the column diameters at each stage, and uses the largest diameter for the design.

    One can also design a column that has different diameters at different sections of the column if it is cost effective to do so, or if too large of a column diameter may lead to excessive weeping in a given section of the column.

    Once one obtains the column diameter(s), they are usually rounded up to the next 0.5 ft or 0.1 m increment since manufacturers typically deliver trays and shells at these increments.