Date post: | 29-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | alvin-holland |
View: | 225 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Kinetic scheme for hole injection, hopping and trapping in DNA
E
(X+)*
Hole Trap
G G
A A
C CT T
G
A
CT
X+
N
HN
OOP
H
O
OO-
Cl
MeO
X+-Labeled DNA duplexes
3‘ 5‘
A X+
T A
T A
GC
T A
A
T A
T A
T A
X+
GC
3‘ 5‘
A
T A
T A
X+
T A
GC
3‘ 5‘
XAG
X+AG
1(X+)*AG
0
0.5
1.0
Wavelength [nm]
Ab
sorb
ance
/Flu
ores
cen
ce
[a.u
.]
400 600500
Structural Characterization
• Melting Points• CD Spectra• NMR Structure
transition dipole moments of ACMA vs. duplex axis: ~70-75° consistent with time-resolved fluorescence polarisation (65-90°)
H6,H8 H1‘
H2‘‘
H2‘
MeasuredCalculated
Restraints :• NOEs (136 intra DNA + 7 inter ACMA-DNA) 0 violations (>0,2 Å)• Anisotropy of chemical shifts
QF-ACMA-NMR Struktur 1 03-10-21.ppt
NMR structure of 5‘ GCGTAAX+AATGCG duplex
Griesinger/Neubauer 2003
Kinetics of photo-induced guanine oxidation via (X+)*
-1 0 10 100 1000
-1,0
-0,5
0,0
0,5
1,0
455 nm Pump / 500 nm Probe
X+(AT) X+G X+AG
A (
a.u.
)
Time (ps)
X+AT CGC TAT TAT TAX+ ATT TAT CGC-3’
X+GA GCG TTA TAA GX+A TAA TAT GCG-3’
X+AGA GCG TTA TAG AX+A TAA TAT GCG-3’
Duplex ES (ns) CS (ns) CR (ns)X+G 0.003 0.003 0.030X+AG 6.9 11.2 ----X+ AT 18.0 ---- ----
kG / kAG ~ 4000“” ~ 2.4 Å-1
Factors controlling nonadiabatic charge transfer
Marcus formula:
classical nuclear dynamics
ET rate k determined by distance
dependant 3 terms
– effective electronic coupling HDA
– free energy change G
– reorganization energy
2
22 1exp
4 ( )4 ( )DA
G R Rk H R
R kTR kT
X+Z 5’-GCG TTA TAA ZX+A TAA TAT GCGX+AZ 5’-GCG TTA TAZ AX+A TAA TAT GCGX+AAZ 5’-GCG TTA AZA AX+A TAA TAT GCG
NH
O
PO O
O
O
PO O
O NH
Cl
H3CO
+
[
[
X+ =
Distance dependent activation energy of hole transfer rates in DNA duplex
Temperature Range: 245-305 K
HF-Analysis of Ea and k-03-10-21.ppt
How to analyze activation energies and rates
TkE
expT
Ak
B
a21
2
/)λ(V
A
weak contribution
Duplex Ea [eV] kFET [s-1]
(T=285 K) [s-1]
X+Z < 0.015 2.0 1012 6.2 1013
X+AZ 0.09 ± 0.01 9.3 1010 6.3 1013
X+AAZ 0.20 ± 0.02 4.6 107 2.8 1012
X+G 0.08 ± 0.04 2.0 1011 9.1 1013
X+AG 0.20 ± 0.04 6.5 107 4.0 1012
4
GE
2
a
Tk/EFET
BaeTkA
Distance dependence of reorganisation energy
λ
λGEa
4
2
Duplex Ea [eV] FET [eV]
X+G 0.08 ± 0.04 0.6 ± 0.1
X+AG 0.20 ± 0.04 1.0 ± 0.2
X+Z < 0.015 0.6 ± 0.1
X+AZ 0.09 ± 0.01 1.1 ± 0.1
X+AAZ 0.20 ± 0.02 1.4 ± 0.1
+ + ½ + ½
Small D/A distance&Smaller
Large D/A distance&Larger
Initial states Transition states
+ + ½ + ½
Reorganisation energy for the simple case of a self-exchange reaction
(G=0)
sopDAs εεRrr
)e(λ111
2
1
2
1
21
2
Distance dependence of the medium reorganization energy
stopDAADs Rrr
e
11121
21
)( 2
Marcus Two-Sphere-Model:
rD rA 4.5 Å
Optimization of charge transport energetics
Minimization of medium reorganization energy
• Short D/A distances
• Nonpolar environment
On the distance dependence of charge transfer in DNA Who did the work?
M.E. Michel-Beyerle Group: Design of Oligonucleotides and fs pump-probe spectroscopy Stephan Hess (Thesis 2002) & M. Götz (Thesis 2002) William B. Davis (now at Washington State at Pullman) Till von Feilitzsch & Gagik Gurzadyan at present
Nanosecond pump-probe spectroscopy Isabella. Naydenova, Reinhard Haselsberger & Alex Ogrodnik
Collaborations Fs Broadband Absorption spectrocopy N. P. Ernsting , S. A. Kovalenko & J. L. Pérez Lustres (HU Berlin)
NMR Structure C. Griesinger & H. Neubauer (MPI Göttingen)
Thermal Injection & Charge Transport B. Giese (U. Basel)
Quantum Chemical Computations & MD Simulations N. Rösch & A. Voityuk (TU München)
Modelling of Charge Transfer & Transport Dynamics M. Bixon & J. Jortner (Tel Aviv U.) M. D. Newton (Brookhaven)
Funding
VW-Stiftung DFG SFB 377
EU 5th & 6th Frame Program