District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Academy of Dover
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%87.50% No78
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes66
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes44
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%66.67% No46
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%87.50% No78
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%100.00% Yes66
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%100.00% Yes44
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Academy of Dover
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%66.67% No46
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%80.00% No45
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%33.33% No13
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%37.50% No8 3
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%33.33% No6 2
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%25.00% No4 1
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%16.67% No6 1
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%60.00% No5 3
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%50.00% No8 4
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%16.67% No6 1
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%50.00% Yes4 2
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%33.33% No6 2
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%20.00% No5 1
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%0.00% No1 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Academy of Dover
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 42 566 0 4 Yes 0
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 20 231 0 1 Yes 0
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%100.00% Yes24 245A 2011 65.0%87.50% Yes16 145A 2012 66.0%100.00% Yes20 20
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 18 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 2 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 5 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 11 1 12.86 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 3 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Academy of Dover
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes24 0
5B 2011 17.7%6.25% Yes16 1
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes20 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes024
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes016
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes020
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.00 There were no survey responses from this LEA for FFY 2009.
N/A
8 2011 86.00 2 2 0.0% No
8 2012 87.05 1 6 83.3% No
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Academy of Dover
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes1 0
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes1 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Academy of Dover
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Appoquinimink
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.071.8%28 11 No
1 2011 85.068.4%39 18 No
1 2012 87.084.0%42 8 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 6.6 No258 17
2 4.42011 0.1 Yes260 18
2 3.82012 3.4 Yes238 8
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 NoNoElem No
3A 2010 NoNoMiddle No
3A 2010 YesNoHigh Sch No
3A 2011 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2011 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2011 YesYesMiddle Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Appoquinimink
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%73.44% No4764
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%98.82% No8485
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%97.18% No6971
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%71.64% No4867
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes7777
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%97.75% No8789
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%67.95% No5378
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes7676
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%97.40% No7577
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%75.61% No6282
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes8989
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2011 YesYesHigh Sch Yes
3A 2012 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2012 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2012 High Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
AppoquiniminkIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes8989
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%51.81% No4383
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%98.84% Yes8586
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%97.78% No8890
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%57.33% No4375
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%98.80% Yes8283
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%98.72% Yes7778
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%23.08% No1252
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%98.72% Yes7778
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%91.11% No4145
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%73.44% No4764
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%94.12% No8085
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%94.37% No6771
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%71.64% No4867
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%100.00% Yes7777
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%96.63% No8689
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%67.95% No5378
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Appoquinimink
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%100.00% Yes7676
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%97.40% No7577
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%75.61% No6282
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%97.75% No8789
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%98.88% Yes8889
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%51.81% No4383
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%98.85% Yes8687
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%96.67% No8790
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%57.33% No4375
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%98.81% Yes8384
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%98.72% Yes7778
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%23.53% No1251
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%100.00% Yes7777
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%88.89% No4045
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%26.56% No64 17
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%23.53% No85 20
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
AppoquiniminkIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%40.58% Yes69 28
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%19.40% No67 13
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%22.08% No77 17
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%45.45% Yes88 40
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%21.79% No78 17
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%18.42% No76 14
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%46.67% Yes75 35
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%26.83% No82 22
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%19.10% No89 17
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%24.72% No89 22
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%18.29% No82 15
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%27.91% No86 24
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%40.23% Yes87 35
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%12.00% No75 9
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%31.33% No83 26
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%53.25% Yes77 41
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
AppoquiniminkIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%12.00% No50 6
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%25.64% No78 20
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%50.00% Yes40 20
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%20.31% No64 13
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%22.35% No85 19
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%40.30% Yes67 27
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%25.37% No67 17
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%14.29% No77 11
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%55.17% Yes87 48
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%32.05% No78 25
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%26.32% No76 20
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%50.67% Yes75 38
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%26.83% No82 22
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%25.84% No89 23
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%38.64% Yes88 34
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%29.27% No82 24
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Appoquinimink
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%26.44% No87 23
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%43.02% Yes86 37
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%20.00% No75 15
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%27.38% No84 23
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%57.14% Yes77 44
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%10.42% No48 5
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%40.26% No77 31
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%51.28% Yes39 20
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 1013 8117 7 38 Yes 2.11
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 1014 8376 5 34 Yes 1.21
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 7 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 29 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Appoquinimink
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%72.96% Yes969 7075A 2011 65.0%70.48% Yes1013 7145A 2012 66.0%73.37% Yes1014 744
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%6.19% Yes969 60
5B 2011 17.7%6.52% Yes1013 66
5B 2012 17.5%5.42% Yes1014 55
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%1.86% Yes18969
5C 2011 3.6%2.57% Yes261013
5C 2012 3.6%2.37% Yes241014
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Black 357 5 3.99 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 59 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 828 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 299 4 2.86 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 4 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 21 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 59 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 16 1 13.35 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 614 3 1.04 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Appoquinimink
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 100.00%99 99 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.0201 37 238 84.5% No
8 2011 86.0176 23 199 88.4% Yes
8 2012 87.0192 25 217 88.5% Yes
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20117 93.3 91.9 Yes 67 64.9 Yes 7A - Social/Emotional
20117 88.5 91.9 No 54 64.9 No 7B - Knowledge
20117 76 91.9 No 68 64.9 Yes 7C - Behavior
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127 76.6 90.6 No 61.1 60.4 Yes 7A - Social/Emotional
20127 75 93 No 55.6 54.5 Yes 7B - Knowledge
20127 84.8 91.9 No 79.6 65 Yes 7C - Behavior
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Appoquinimink
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes8 0
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes181 0
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes131 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Appoquinimink
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes17 17
12 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes31 31
12 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes36 36
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.0100.0 Yes26 26
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.090.0 No41 37
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Brandywine
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.064.0%48 27 No
1 2011 85.074.6%47 16 No
1 2012 87.068.7%46 21 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 5.1 Yes312 16
2 4.42011 4.6 No346 16
2 3.82012 6.4 No326 21
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 NoNoElem No
3A 2010 NoNoMiddle No
3A 2010 NoNoHigh Sch No
3A 2011 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2011 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2011 YesYesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Brandywine
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%72.34% No6894
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%98.26% No113115
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes102102
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%79.07% No6886
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%99.18% Yes121122
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%99.12% Yes113114
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%78.50% No84107
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%96.97% No9699
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes119119
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%85.71% No7284
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes127127
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%98.02% No99101
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%72.83% No6792
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2012 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2012 NoYesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
BrandywineIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%98.02% No99101
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%95.45% No105110
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%63.83% No6094
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%97.78% Yes8890
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%96.55% No8487
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%62.12% No4166
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%97.30% Yes7274
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%95.06% No7781
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%72.63% No6995
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%92.98% No106114
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%92.16% No94102
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%79.07% No6886
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%92.62% No113122
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%92.17% No106115
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%78.50% No84107
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%96.97% No9699
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%93.28% No111119
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Brandywine
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%85.71% No7284
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%96.06% No122127
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%97.03% No98101
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%72.83% No6792
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%98.02% No99101
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%90.91% No100110
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%62.77% No5994
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%96.67% No8790
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%96.55% No8487
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%62.12% No4166
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%100.00% Yes7272
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%93.83% No7681
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%22.34% No94 21
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%21.74% No115 25
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%54.90% Yes102 56
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
BrandywineIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%37.21% No86 32
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%29.51% No122 36
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%42.86% Yes112 48
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%37.38% No107 40
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%28.28% No99 28
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%33.90% No118 40
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%20.48% No83 17
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%20.47% No127 26
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%19.19% No99 19
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%20.00% No90 18
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%17.82% No101 18
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%22.86% No105 24
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%22.34% No94 21
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%17.78% No90 16
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%22.62% No84 19
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%10.77% No65 7
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
BrandywineIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%17.57% No74 13
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%27.27% No77 21
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%25.26% No95 24
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%18.42% No114 21
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%42.55% Yes94 40
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%30.23% No86 26
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%25.41% No122 31
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%38.10% Yes105 40
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%34.58% No107 37
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%24.24% No99 24
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%42.73% Yes110 47
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%27.71% No83 23
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%25.98% No127 33
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%35.71% Yes98 35
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%31.46% No89 28
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%14.85% No101 15
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Brandywine
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%36.00% Yes100 36
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%25.81% No93 24
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%16.67% No90 15
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%30.95% No84 26
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%16.92% No65 11
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%26.39% No72 19
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%23.68% No76 18
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 1168 9192 9 117 Yes 0.61
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 1213 9438 10 99 Yes 0.79
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 4 1 17.46 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 24 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 658 17 1.80 1.32 No
20104B Hispanic 62 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Brandywine
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%74.19% Yes1108 8225A 2011 65.0%79.28% Yes1168 9265A 2012 66.0%76.26% Yes1213 925
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%11.19% Yes1108 124
5B 2011 17.7%10.02% Yes1168 117
5B 2012 17.5%9.40% Yes1213 114
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%1.44% Yes161108
5C 2011 3.6%0.68% Yes81168
5C 2012 3.6%0.49% Yes61213
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 46.21%145 67 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B White 542 3 0.39 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 626 7 0.88 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 4 1 19.64 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 16 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 54 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 7 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 461 1 0.17 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Brandywine
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.0200 32 232 86.2% Yes
8 2011 86.0188 32 220 85.5% No
8 2012 87.0218 40 258 84.5% No
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20117 90.9 91.9 No 29 64.9 No 7A - Social/Emotional
20117 92 91.9 Yes 42 64.9 No 7B - Knowledge
20117 88.5 91.9 No 54 64.9 No 7C - Behavior
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127 76.6 90.6 No 61.1 60.4 Yes 7A - Social/Emotional
20127 75 93 No 55.6 54.5 Yes 7B - Knowledge
20127 84.8 91.9 No 79.6 65 Yes 7C - Behavior
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Brandywine
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes42 42
12 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes37 37
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%94.0% No94 6
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes131 0
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes96 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Brandywine
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes34 34
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.094.0 No50 47
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.063.0 No35 22
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Caesar Rodney
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.071.4%45 18 No
1 2011 85.063.4%52 30 No
1 2012 87.069.2%36 16 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 6.2 No403 25
2 4.42011 0.1 Yes387 30
2 3.82012 4.6 No345 16
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 NoNoElem No
3A 2010 NoNoMiddle No
3A 2010 YesNoHigh Sch No
3A 2011 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2011 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2011 YesYesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Caesar Rodney
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%80.23% No6986
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%99.06% No105106
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%98.57% No6970
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%88.64% No7888
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%98.89% No8990
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%99.03% Yes102103
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%80.91% No89110
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes8484
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes9090
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%74.75% No7499
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%98.97% Yes9697
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes7373
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%61.05% No5895
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2012 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2012 YesYesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Caesar RodneyIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%98.99% Yes9899
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%96.51% No8386
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%56.32% No4987
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%100.00% Yes8585
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%98.81% Yes8384
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%51.67% No3160
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%100.00% Yes6565
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%98.44% Yes6364
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%80.23% No6986
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%94.29% No6670
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%88.64% No7888
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%94.38% No8489
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%94.17% No97103
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%80.91% No89110
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%97.56% No8082
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%94.51% No8691
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%74.75% No7499
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Caesar Rodney
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%96.91% No9497
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%97.26% No7173
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%61.05% No5895
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%97.98% No9799
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%97.67% No8486
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%56.32% No4987
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%102.44% Yes8482
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%96.43% No8184
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%51.67% No3160
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%100.00% Yes6565
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%95.31% No6164
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%55.81% No86 48
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%52.34% No107 56
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%56.52% Yes69 39
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%46.59% No88 41
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Caesar RodneyIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%64.04% No89 57
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%68.63% Yes102 70
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%48.18% No110 53
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%53.57% No84 45
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%57.78% Yes90 52
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%37.37% No99 37
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%38.14% No97 37
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%35.62% No73 26
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%33.68% No95 32
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%25.25% No99 25
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%42.68% Yes82 35
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%29.89% No87 26
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%31.76% No85 27
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%49.38% Yes81 40
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%31.67% No60 19
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%33.85% No65 22
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Caesar RodneyIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%42.86% Yes63 27
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%53.49% No86 46
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%49.53% No107 53
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%63.64% Yes66 42
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%45.45% No88 40
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%47.19% No89 42
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%61.86% Yes97 60
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%39.09% No110 43
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%53.57% No84 45
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%58.14% Yes86 50
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%25.25% No99 25
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%39.18% No97 38
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%36.62% Yes71 26
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%32.63% No95 31
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%33.33% No99 33
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%55.42% Yes83 46
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Caesar Rodney
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%31.03% No87 27
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%34.52% No84 29
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%43.04% Yes79 34
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%36.67% No60 22
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%36.92% No65 24
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%37.70% Yes61 23
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 1241 6118 12 44 Yes 1.23
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 1211 6345 3 42 Yes 0.37
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 4 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 22 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 552 9 1.44 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 57 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 809 8 0.87 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Caesar Rodney
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%57.48% No1270 7305A 2011 65.0%60.54% No1262 7645A 2012 66.0%63.50% No1211 769
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%18.58% No1270 236
5B 2011 17.7%17.67% Yes1262 223
5B 2012 17.5%19.32% No1211 234
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%10.94% No1391270
5C 2011 3.6%12.20% No1541262
5C 2012 3.6%10.32% No1251211
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 42.34%137 58 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20114B Afr.Amer. 486 7 2.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 3 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 14 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 60 1 2.32 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 14 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 664 4 0.84 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Caesar Rodney
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.0236 31 267 88.4% Yes
8 2011 86.0176 29 205 85.9% No
8 2012 87.0177 21 198 89.4% Yes
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20117 82.8 91.9 No 62 64.9 No 7A - Social/Emotional
20117 92.9 91.9 Yes 39 64.9 No 7B - Knowledge
20117 75 91.9 No 75 64.9 Yes 7C - Behavior
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127 75 90.6 No 45.8 64.9 No 7A - Social/Emotional
20127 76.2 93 No 39.6 54.5 No 7B - Knowledge
20127 74.3 91.9 No 54.2 65 No 7C - Behavior
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Caesar Rodney
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes15 15
12 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes19 19
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes8 0
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes51 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Caesar Rodney
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%93.3% No30 28
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Campus Community
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes44
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes33
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes33
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.080.0%4 1 No
1 2011 85.0
1 2012 87.0100.0%8 0 Yes
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 0.0 Yes32 0
2 4.42011 0.0 Yes35 0
2 3.82012 8.3 No36 3
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Campus CommunityIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes66
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes66
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes99
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes44
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes44
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes66
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%40.00% No25
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes55
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes77
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%80.00% No810
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes55
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%90.00% No910
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%100.00% Yes77
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%90.91% No1011
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Campus CommunityIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%100.00% Yes44
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%100.00% Yes33
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%100.00% Yes33
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%100.00% Yes66
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%83.33% No56
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%100.00% Yes99
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes44
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%100.00% Yes44
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes66
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%40.00% No25
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%100.00% Yes55
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes77
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%90.00% No910
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Campus Community
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes55
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%90.00% No910
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%100.00% Yes66
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%90.91% No1011
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%75.00% Yes4 3
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%16.67% No6 1
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%16.67% No6 1
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%20.00% No5 1
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%55.56% Yes9 5
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%50.00% Yes4 2
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%0.00% No4 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Campus CommunityIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%16.67% No6 1
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%20.00% No5 1
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%20.00% No5 1
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%0.00% No7 0
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%10.00% No10 1
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%10.00% No10 1
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%0.00% No7 0
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%10.00% No10 1
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%75.00% No4 3
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%0.00% No3 0
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%33.33% No3 1
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%16.67% No6 1
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%0.00% No3 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Campus Community
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%20.00% No5 1
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%20.00% No5 1
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%55.56% Yes9 5
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%25.00% No4 1
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%0.00% No4 0
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%16.67% No6 1
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%20.00% No5 1
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%40.00% Yes5 2
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%42.86% No7 3
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%10.00% No10 1
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%0.00% No5 0
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%40.00% No10 4
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%0.00% No6 0
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%40.00% Yes10 4
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Campus Community
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 80 513 0 1 Yes 0
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 72 505 0 2 Yes 0
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%100.00% Yes71 715A 2011 65.0%100.00% Yes80 805A 2012 66.0%98.61% Yes72 71
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 20 1 9.13 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 9 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 42 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 19 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 10 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 4 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 47 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Campus Community
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes71 0
5B 2011 17.7%0.00% Yes80 0
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes72 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes071
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes080
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes072
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.06 2 8 75.0% No
8 2011 86.00 5 5 0.0% No
8 2012 87.09 1 10 90.0% Yes
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Campus Community
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes3 0
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes3 0
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes3 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Campus Community
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.088.0 No8 7
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Cape Henlopen
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.077.1%27 8 No
1 2011 85.082.1%32 7 No
1 2012 87.076.6%36 11 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 2.5 Yes238 6
2 4.42011 0.0 Yes259 7
2 3.82012 3.8 Yes185 7
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 YesNoElem No
3A 2010 NoNoMiddle No
3A 2010 NoNoHigh Sch No
3A 2011 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2011 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2011 YesYesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Cape Henlopen
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%73.85% No4865
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes5353
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%98.31% No5859
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%66.67% No4872
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes6262
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%96.67% No5860
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%60.49% No4981
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes7878
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%91.94% No5762
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%47.27% No2655
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes8282
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes8080
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%41.43% No2970
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2012 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2012 YesYesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Cape HenlopenIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes5757
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes8282
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%44.62% No2965
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%98.61% Yes7172
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%94.34% No5053
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%68.42% No3957
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%98.39% Yes6162
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%91.80% No5661
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%73.85% No4865
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%84.91% No4553
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%98.31% No5859
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%66.67% No4872
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%93.55% No5862
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%96.67% No5860
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%60.49% No4981
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%94.87% No7478
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%90.48% No5763
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Cape Henlopen
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%48.21% No2756
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%85.19% No6981
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%97.50% No7880
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%41.43% No2970
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%94.74% No5457
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%93.90% No7782
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%44.62% No2965
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%94.44% No6872
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%92.45% No4953
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%68.42% No3957
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%95.16% No5962
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%78.69% No4861
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%60.00% No65 39
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%56.60% No53 30
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%79.31% Yes58 46
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Cape HenlopenIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%41.67% No72 30
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%61.29% No62 38
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%98.28% Yes58 57
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%27.16% No81 22
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%67.95% No78 53
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%73.68% Yes57 42
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%23.64% No55 13
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%23.17% No82 19
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%39.24% Yes79 31
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%23.19% No69 16
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%42.11% No57 24
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%62.96% Yes81 51
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%27.69% No65 18
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%52.78% Yes72 38
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%72.00% Yes50 36
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%23.64% No55 13
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Cape HenlopenIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%35.48% No62 22
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%46.43% Yes56 26
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%49.23% No65 32
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%50.94% No53 27
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%75.86% Yes58 44
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%29.17% No72 21
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%53.23% No62 33
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%86.21% Yes58 50
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%34.57% No81 28
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%53.85% No78 42
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%82.46% Yes57 47
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%23.21% No56 13
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%28.40% No81 23
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%45.45% Yes77 35
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%34.78% No69 24
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%36.84% No57 21
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Cape Henlopen
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%71.05% Yes76 54
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%30.77% No65 20
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%45.83% No72 33
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%75.51% Yes49 37
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%27.78% No54 15
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%40.32% No62 25
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%41.67% Yes48 20
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 668 3735 11 31 Yes 2.71
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 751 3999 6 17 Yes 1.88
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 9 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 9 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 238 7 1.78 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 79 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Cape Henlopen
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%45.16% No826 3735A 2011 65.0%39.40% No670 2645A 2012 66.0%44.00% No750 330
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%22.15% No826 183
5B 2011 17.7%21.79% No670 146
5B 2012 17.5%20.80% No750 156
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%7.51% No62826
5C 2011 3.6%9.85% No66670
5C 2012 3.6%7.47% No56750
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 100.00%46 46 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B White 599 6 0.61 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 163 8 5.91 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 8 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 6 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 45 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 7 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 438 3 0.83 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Cape Henlopen
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.0141 26 167 84.4% No
8 2011 86.0132 16 148 89.2% Yes
8 2012 87.0137 16 153 89.5% Yes
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20117 71.1 91.9 No 71 64.9 Yes 7A - Social/Emotional
20117 94.6 91.9 Yes 51 64.9 No 7B - Knowledge
20117 35.1 91.9 No 81 64.9 Yes 7C - Behavior
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127 85 90.6 No 43.5 60.4 No 7A - Social/Emotional
20127 75 93 No 47.8 54.5 No 7B - Knowledge
20127 86.7 91.9 No 73.9 65 Yes 7C - Behavior
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Cape Henlopen
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0%90.9% No11 10
12 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes12 12
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes26 0
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes4 0
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes2 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Cape Henlopen
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes7 7
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2011 100.063.0 No45 71
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Capital
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.059.4%38 26 No
1 2011 85.054.4%37 31 No
1 2012 87.053.0%35 31 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 9.7 No370 36
2 4.42011 0.1 Yes344 31
2 3.82012 5.0 No278 14
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 NoNoElem No
3A 2010 NoNoMiddle No
3A 2010 NoNoHigh Sch No
3A 2011 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2011 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2011 YesYesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Capital
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%87.65% No7181
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%97.70% No8587
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes7373
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%82.05% No6478
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%97.78% No8890
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%97.67% No8486
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%98.90% No9091
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes8787
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%97.62% No8284
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%97.27% No107110
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes101101
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%97.59% No8183
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%59.18% No5898
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2012 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2012 YesYesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
CapitalIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%94.85% No9297
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes9090
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%62.64% No5791
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%98.13% Yes105107
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%98.96% Yes9596
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%68.06% No4972
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%98.86% Yes8788
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%96.43% Yes5456
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%87.65% No7181
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%72.09% No6286
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%73.97% No5473
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%82.05% No6478
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%70.93% No6186
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%86.05% No7486
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%98.90% No9091
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%87.36% No7687
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%96.43% No8184
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Capital
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%96.36% No106110
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%86.87% No8699
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%96.39% No8083
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%59.18% No5898
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%90.72% No8897
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%98.89% Yes8990
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%62.64% No5791
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%101.94% Yes105103
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%96.84% No9295
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%68.06% No4972
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%95.45% No8488
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%91.07% No5156
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%25.00% No80 20
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%37.93% No87 33
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%64.38% Yes73 47
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
CapitalIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%37.18% No78 29
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%45.45% No88 40
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%51.19% Yes84 43
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%30.77% No91 28
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%28.74% No87 25
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%65.85% Yes82 54
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%38.53% No109 42
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%9.90% No101 10
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%45.12% Yes82 37
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%15.31% No98 15
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%25.77% No97 25
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%25.56% No90 23
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%17.78% No90 16
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%20.56% No107 22
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%36.17% Yes94 34
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%18.31% No71 13
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
CapitalIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%14.77% No88 13
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%33.33% No54 18
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%36.25% No80 29
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%27.91% No86 24
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%75.93% Yes54 41
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%46.15% No78 36
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%34.09% No88 30
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%62.16% Yes74 46
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%38.46% No91 35
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%31.03% No87 27
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%61.73% Yes81 50
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%45.37% No108 49
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%16.16% No99 16
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%53.09% Yes81 43
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%21.43% No98 21
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%29.90% No97 29
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Capital
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%31.46% No89 28
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%16.67% No90 15
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%23.36% No107 25
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%52.75% Yes91 48
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%18.31% No71 13
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%17.05% No88 15
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%45.10% Yes51 23
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 1061 5042 42 73 No 2.99
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 1067 5128 36 129 No 1.34
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 10 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 15 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 710 28 4.56 1.32 No
20104B Hispanic 69 1 1.68 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Capital
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%66.55% Yes1106 7365A 2011 65.0%59.91% No1060 6355A 2012 66.0%56.04% No1067 598
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%18.81% No1106 208
5B 2011 17.7%16.60% Yes1060 176
5B 2012 17.5%17.81% No1067 190
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%7.14% No791106
5C 2011 3.6%7.45% No791060
5C 2012 3.6%10.03% No1071067
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 69.33%75 52 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B White 483 18 4.31 1.32 No
20114B Afr.Amer. 603 30 3.44 1.3 No
20114B AI/AK 6 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 9 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 58 2 2.38 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 8 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 377 10 1.83 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Capital
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.0156 27 183 85.2% No
8 2011 86.0116 13 129 89.9% Yes
8 2012 87.0135 8 143 94.4% Yes
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20117 87.8 91.9 No 45 64.9 No 7A - Social/Emotional
20117 100 91.9 Yes 44 64.9 No 7B - Knowledge
20117 90.6 91.9 No 69 64.9 Yes 7C - Behavior
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127 88.7 90.6 No 49.2 60.4 No 7A - Social/Emotional
20127 86.4 93 No 42.4 54.5 No 7B - Knowledge
20127 90.2 91.9 No 61 65 No 7C - Behavior
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Capital
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes26 26
12 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes21 21
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%97.3% No36 1
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes2 0
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes7 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Capital
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes20 20
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.067.0 No57 38
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Charter School of Wilmington
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2012 10
No data was reported for FFY 2011
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 10
No data reported for FFY 2011
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2012 87.0
Data was not reported for this FFY.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 0 0 0 Yes 0
Discipline data was not collected for this LEA for FFY 2011
2011
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Charter School of Wilmington
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2012 66.0%100.00% Yes- -
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes2 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes02
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
20114B Afr.Amer. 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Charter School of Wilmington
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2012 87.01 0 1 100.0% Yes
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Charter School of WilmingtonIndicator School
Year% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.00.0 No0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Christina
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.052.1%50 46 No
1 2011 85.053.0%71 63 No
1 2012 87.052.2%71 65 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 6.3 No765 48
2 4.42011 0.1 Yes747 63
2 3.82012 12.8 No509 65
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 NoNoElem No
3A 2010 NoNoMiddle No
3A 2010 YesNoHigh Sch No
3A 2011 NoNoElem No
3A 2011 NoNoMiddle No
3A 2011 NoNoHigh Sch No
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Christina
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%63.80% No141221
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%99.53% Yes214215
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%96.30% No208216
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%58.47% No138236
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%99.61% Yes255256
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%99.07% Yes213215
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%58.72% No138235
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes247247
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%98.46% No255259
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%48.46% No110227
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%97.22% No210216
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%98.14% No211215
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%38.84% No87224
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 NoYesElem No
3A 2012 NoYesMiddle No
3A 2012 NoYesHigh Sch No
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
ChristinaIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%98.58% Yes208211
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%96.76% No179185
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%43.02% No77179
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%96.83% No214221
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%96.57% No197204
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%50.62% No82162
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%98.18% Yes162165
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%84.67% No127150
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%63.80% No141221
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%96.74% No208215
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%92.59% No200216
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%58.47% No138236
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%97.68% No253259
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%96.74% No208215
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%58.72% No138235
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%95.14% No235247
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%97.68% No253259
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Christina
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%49.34% No112227
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%88.02% No191217
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%93.02% No200215
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%38.84% No87224
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%89.95% No188209
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%90.81% No168185
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%43.02% No77179
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%87.73% No193220
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%95.10% No194204
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%51.55% No83161
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%97.01% Yes162167
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%79.33% No119150
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%36.82% No220 81
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%31.63% No215 68
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%47.12% Yes208 98
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
ChristinaIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%27.12% No236 64
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%25.19% No258 65
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%37.74% Yes212 80
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%27.47% No233 64
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%31.17% No247 77
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%38.43% Yes255 98
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%23.29% No219 51
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%17.13% No216 37
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%17.70% No209 37
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%19.46% No221 43
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%28.91% No211 61
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%26.82% No179 48
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%15.43% No175 27
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%20.81% No221 46
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%26.90% No197 53
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%14.38% No153 22
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
ChristinaIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%21.82% No165 36
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%24.00% No125 30
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%34.09% No220 75
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%27.91% No215 60
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%52.00% Yes200 104
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%25.85% No236 61
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%20.85% No259 54
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%38.16% Yes207 79
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%31.76% No233 74
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%27.53% No247 68
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%47.04% Yes253 119
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%21.17% No222 47
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%22.58% No217 49
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%25.76% No198 51
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%20.36% No221 45
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%26.32% No209 55
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Christina
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%26.19% No168 44
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%15.43% No175 27
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%20.00% No220 44
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%24.23% No194 47
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%15.58% No154 24
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%20.96% No167 35
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%32.48% No117 38
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 2487 14031 72 174 No 2.46
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 2483 13909 49 187 No 1.47
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 8 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 84 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 1361 47 2.05 1.32 No
20104B Hispanic 314 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Christina
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%53.52% No2500 13385A 2011 65.0%54.56% No2478 13525A 2012 66.0%53.64% No2483 1332
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%27.00% No2500 675
5B 2011 17.7%25.75% No2478 638
5B 2012 17.5%25.86% No2483 642
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%7.44% No1862500
5C 2011 3.6%7.83% No1942478
5C 2012 3.6%7.97% No1982483
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 100.00%395 395 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B White 1126 8 0.42 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 1170 59 4.07 1.3 No
20114B AI/AK 12 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 60 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 310 6 1.56 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 43 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 892 7 0.63 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Christina
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.0385 89 474 81.2% No
8 2011 86.0295 79 374 78.9% No
8 2012 87.0352 73 425 82.8% No
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20117 85.7 91.9 No 31 64.9 No 7A - Social/Emotional
20117 88.2 91.9 No 29 64.9 No 7B - Knowledge
20117 85.1 91.9 No 32 64.9 No 7C - Behavior
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127 77.8 90.6 No 54.8 60.4 No 7A - Social/Emotional
20127 80 93 No 45.2 54.5 No 7B - Knowledge
20127 77.2 91.9 No 68.3 65 Yes 7C - Behavior
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Christina
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes96 96
12 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes71 71
12 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes89 89
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes22 0
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes17 0
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes4 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Christina
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.0100.0 Yes50 50
13 2011 100.069.0 No70 101
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Colonial
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.075.0%45 15 No
1 2011 85.063.6%49 28 No
1 2012 87.062.1%41 25 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 5.2 Yes367 19
2 4.42011 0.1 Yes358 28
2 3.82012 7.6 No331 25
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 NoNoElem No
3A 2010 NoNoMiddle No
3A 2010 NoNoHigh Sch No
3A 2011 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2011 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2011 YesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Colonial
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%78.90% No86109
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%99.09% No109110
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%98.80% No8283
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%72.38% No76105
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%99.20% Yes124125
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes107107
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%66.91% No91136
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%99.18% No121122
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes110110
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%64.12% No84131
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes136136
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%99.12% Yes113114
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%57.48% No73127
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2012 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2012 YesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
ColonialIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%99.21% Yes125126
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes127127
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%42.42% No56132
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%98.33% Yes118120
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%98.26% Yes113115
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%25.00% No1976
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%100.00% Yes6969
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%95.59% Yes6568
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%78.90% No86109
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%93.64% No103110
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%95.18% No7983
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%73.08% No76104
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%93.60% No117125
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%94.39% No101107
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%66.91% No91136
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%98.36% No120122
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%98.18% No108110
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Colonial
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%64.12% No84131
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%96.32% No131136
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%92.98% No106114
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%57.48% No73127
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%98.41% Yes124126
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%97.64% No124127
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%42.42% No56132
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%96.67% No116120
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%97.39% No112115
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%23.68% No1876
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%97.10% Yes6769
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%94.12% No6468
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%31.19% No109 34
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%36.36% No110 40
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%36.59% Yes82 30
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
ColonialIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%26.67% No105 28
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%40.80% No125 51
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%46.73% Yes107 50
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%18.52% No135 25
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%32.79% No122 40
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%50.00% Yes110 55
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%17.56% No131 23
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%22.06% No136 30
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%27.43% No113 31
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%15.75% No127 20
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%23.81% No126 30
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%23.62% No127 30
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%12.12% No132 16
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%17.50% No120 21
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%25.66% No113 29
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%9.21% No76 7
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
ColonialIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%30.43% No69 21
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%21.54% No65 14
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%27.52% No109 30
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%30.00% No110 33
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%27.85% No79 22
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%25.00% No104 26
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%32.00% No125 40
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%43.56% Yes101 44
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%20.74% No135 28
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%28.69% No122 35
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%37.04% Yes108 40
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%15.27% No131 20
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%19.85% No136 27
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%28.30% No106 30
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%22.83% No127 29
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%18.25% No126 23
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Colonial
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%25.81% No124 32
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%18.32% No131 24
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%17.50% No120 21
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%27.68% No112 31
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%12.00% No75 9
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%27.54% No69 19
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%17.19% No64 11
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 1293 8335 27 124 No 1.66
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 1295 8398 31 131 No 1.53
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 4 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 24 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 714 17 1.63 1.32 No
20104B Hispanic 251 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Colonial
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%32.89% No1365 4495A 2011 65.0%40.28% No1291 5205A 2012 66.0%53.20% No1295 689
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%21.68% No1365 296
5B 2011 17.7%21.30% No1291 275
5B 2012 17.5%19.15% No1295 248
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%11.14% No1521365
5C 2011 3.6%10.22% No1321291
5C 2012 3.6%10.73% No1391295
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 98.20%167 164 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B White 582 9 1.06 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 609 17 1.88 1.3 No
20114B AI/AK 5 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 15 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 204 4 1.32 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 9 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 451 6 0.89 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Colonial
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.0180 29 209 86.1% Yes
8 2011 86.0124 25 149 83.2% No
8 2012 87.0133 35 168 79.2% No
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20117 87.3 91.9 No 59 64.9 No 7A - Social/Emotional
20117 89.7 91.9 No 54 64.9 No 7B - Knowledge
20117 82.5 91.9 No 75 64.9 Yes 7C - Behavior
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127 93.1 90.6 Yes 67.4 60.4 Yes 7A - Social/Emotional
20127 90 93 No 58.7 54.5 No 7B - Knowledge
20127 96.2 91.9 Yes 78.3 65 Yes 7C - Behavior
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Colonial
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes31 31
12 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes28 28
12 2012 100.0%87.9% No33 29
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes63 0
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes7 0
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes5 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Colonial
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.016.0 No25 4
13 2011 100.096.0 No77 80
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delaware Academy of Public Safety and Security
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2012 10
No data was reported for FFY 2011
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 10
No data reported for FFY 2011
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2012 87.0
This indicator did not apply to this LEA for FFY 2011.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A
Discipline data was not collected for this LEA for FFY 2011
2011
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delaware Academy of Public Safety and Security
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 0 Yes 0
Discipline data was not collected for this LEA for FFY 2011
2011
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2012 66.0%100.00% Yes- -
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes10 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes010
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20114B Afr.Amer. 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delaware Academy of Public Safety and Security
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2012 87.03 1 4 75.0% No
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delaware Academy of Public Safety and Security
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.00.0 No0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delaware College Prep
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2012
No data was reported for FFY 2011
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%
No data reported for FFY 2011
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%
No data reported for FFY 2011
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 11 233 0 6 Yes 02010
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delaware College Prep
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
4A 4 270 0 3 Yes 0
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%80.00% Yes- -5A 2011 65.0%80.00% Yes- -5A 2012 66.0%100.00% Yes- -
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes5 0
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 4 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 2 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 1 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delaware College Prep
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2011 17.7%0.00% Yes5 0
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes4 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes05
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes05
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes04
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.00 There were no survey responses from this LEA for FFY 2009.
N/A
8 2011 86.02 0 2 100.0% Yes
8 2012 87.02 0 2 100.0% Yes
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delaware College Prep
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.00.0 No0 0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delaware College Prep
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delaware Military Academy
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%0.00% No02
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%100.00% Yes11
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%
No data was reported for FFY 2011
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%0.00% No02
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.0
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
1 2012 87.0
Data was not reported for this FFY.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 0.0 Yes11 0
2 4.42011 0.0 Yes11 0
2 3.82012 20.0 No5 1
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delaware Military Academy
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%100.00% Yes11
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%
No data was reported for FFY 2011
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%0.00% No1 0
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%0.00% No1 0
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%0.00% No1 0
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%0.00% No1 0
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 5 545 0 0 Yes 0
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 5 554 0 0 Yes 0
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delaware Military Academy
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%100.00% Yes- -5A 2011 65.0%100.00% Yes- -5A 2012 66.0%80.00% Yes- -
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes11 0
5B 2011 17.7%0.00% Yes5 0
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes5 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes011
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes05
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes05
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 2 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 9 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 4 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delaware Military Academy
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.00 There were no survey responses from this LEA for FFY 2009.
N/A
8 2011 86.00 1 1 0.0% No
8 2012 87.00 0 0 0.0% No survey data was captured for this LEA
for the FFY 2011
N/A
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delaware Military Academy
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delaware Military AcademyIndicator School
Year% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.00.0 No0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.080.0 No10 8
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delmar
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.080.0%12 3 No
1 2011 85.092.9%13 1 Yes
1 2012 87.084.6%11 2 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 7.8 No64 5
2 4.42011 0.0 Yes63 1
2 3.82012 3.6 Yes56 2
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 YesNoMiddle No
3A 2010 High Sch
3A 2011 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2011 High Sch
3A 2012 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2012 High Sch
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delmar
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes1515
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes1313
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes1616
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%105.26% Yes2019
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes1515
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%95.00% No1920
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes1717
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes1919
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes1717
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%100.00% Yes1919
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes1717
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%94.12% No1617
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%100.00% Yes1111
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%100.00% Yes1616
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%100.00% Yes1515
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%100.00% Yes1313
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes1616
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delmar
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%100.00% Yes2020
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes1515
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%95.00% No1920
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%94.12% No1617
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%100.00% Yes1919
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes1717
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%78.95% No1519
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%94.12% No1617
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%94.12% No1617
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%100.00% Yes1111
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%100.00% Yes1616
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%26.67% No15 4
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%23.08% No13 3
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%31.25% No16 5
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%25.00% No20 5
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
DelmarIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%46.67% Yes15 7
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%35.00% No20 7
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%23.53% No17 4
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%36.84% Yes19 7
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%29.41% No17 5
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%26.32% No19 5
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%70.59% Yes17 12
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%29.41% No17 5
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%36.36% No11 4
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%31.25% No16 5
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%20.00% No15 3
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%46.15% Yes13 6
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%12.50% No16 2
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%20.00% No20 4
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%46.67% Yes15 7
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%55.00% No20 11
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delmar
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%17.65% No17 3
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%31.58% No19 6
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%11.76% No17 2
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%10.53% No19 2
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%50.00% Yes16 8
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%5.88% No17 1
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%45.45% No11 5
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%25.00% No16 4
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 131 1137 2 4 Yes 6.51
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 132 1178 2 1 Yes 17.85
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 2 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delmar
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%85.34% Yes116 995A 2011 65.0%84.96% Yes133 1135A 2012 66.0%81.82% Yes132 108
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%14.66% Yes116 17
5B 2011 17.7%11.28% Yes133 15
5B 2012 17.5%17.42% Yes132 23
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes0116
5C 2011 3.6%2.26% Yes3133
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes0132
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Black 32 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 6 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 79 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 33 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 9 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 5 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 82 2 6.93 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delmar
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 100.00%4 4 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.016 3 19 84.2% No
8 2011 86.013 2 15 86.7% Yes
8 2012 87.011 2 13 84.6% No
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delmar
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0%50.0% No2 1
12 2011 100.0%75.0% No4 3
12 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes1 1
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.0100.0 Yes25 25
13 2011 100.096.0 No25 26
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes3 0
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes1 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Delmar
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
DSCYF
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%85.71% No67
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes33
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%66.67% No69
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.0
1 2010 84.0
1 2011 85.0
1 2012 87.0
Data was not reported for this FFY.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
DSCYFIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes55
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%66.67% No46
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes88
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes44
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%66.67% No46
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes11
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes88
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%42.86% No614
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%88.89% No89
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes88
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%47.06% No817
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%90.91% No1011
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes99
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%28.00% No725
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%100.00% Yes1414
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%100.00% Yes1414
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
DSCYFIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%85.71% No67
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%33.33% No13
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%66.67% No69
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%80.00% No45
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%100.00% Yes55
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%66.67% No46
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%75.00% No68
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%100.00% Yes44
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%66.67% No46
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%100.00% Yes11
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes88
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%42.86% No614
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%77.78% No79
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%100.00% Yes88
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%47.06% No817
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%90.00% No910
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
DSCYF
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes99
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%24.00% No625
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%92.86% No1314
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%100.00% Yes1414
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%0.00% No7 0
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%11.11% No9 1
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%20.00% No5 1
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%0.00% No8 0
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%0.00% No4 0
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%0.00% No6 0
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%0.00% No1 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
DSCYFIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%0.00% No4 0
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%0.00% No14 0
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%0.00% No9 0
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%20.00% No5 1
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%6.25% No16 1
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%0.00% No11 0
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%33.33% No3 1
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%0.00% No18 0
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%0.00% No14 0
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%14.29% No7 1
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%0.00% No7 0
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%0.00% No2 0
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%11.11% No9 1
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%20.00% No5 1
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%33.33% No3 1
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
DSCYF
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%40.00% No5 2
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%0.00% No8 0
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%0.00% No2 0
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%0.00% No6 0
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%100.00% Yes1 1
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%0.00% No4 0
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%7.14% No14 1
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%0.00% No9 0
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%25.00% No4 1
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%6.25% No16 1
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%0.00% No10 0
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%0.00% No3 0
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%0.00% No18 0
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%7.14% No14 1
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%16.67% No6 1
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
DSCYF
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A
Data was not reported for this LEA for FFY 2011.
2012
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%0.00% No25 05A 2011 65.0%0.00% No19 05A 2012 66.0%0.00% No60 0
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes25 0
5B 2011 17.7%0.00% Yes19 0
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes60 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%100.00% No2525
5C 2011 3.6%100.00% No1919
5C 2012 3.6%100.00% No6060
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20114B Afr.Amer. 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
DSCYF
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.00 There were no survey responses from this LEA for FFY 2009.
N/A
8 2011 86.02 0 2 100.0% Yes
8 2012 87.00 1 1 0.0% No
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
DSCYF
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes2 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
DSCYFIndicator School
Year% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
East Side
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes1010
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes1010
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes99
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%50.00% No48
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%92.31% No1213
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes1111
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%57.14% No47
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.0
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
East SideIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes99
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes99
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%50.00% No36
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes1010
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes99
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%66.67% No23
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes55
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes22
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%100.00% Yes33
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%83.33% No56
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%100.00% Yes1010
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%70.00% No710
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%88.89% No89
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%50.00% No48
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%76.92% No1013
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%72.73% No811
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
East Side
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%57.14% No47
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%100.00% Yes99
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%88.89% No89
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%50.00% No36
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%100.00% Yes1010
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes99
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%66.67% No23
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%80.00% No45
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes22
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%100.00% Yes33
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%83.33% No56
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%20.00% No10 2
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%20.00% No10 2
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%11.11% No9 1
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
East SideIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%0.00% No8 0
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%0.00% No13 0
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%45.45% Yes11 5
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%0.00% No7 0
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%0.00% No9 0
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%0.00% No9 0
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%16.67% No6 1
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%10.00% No10 1
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%44.44% Yes9 4
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%40.00% No5 2
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%20.00% No5 1
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%33.33% No3 1
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%40.00% Yes5 2
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%10.00% No10 1
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
East SideIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%0.00% No10 0
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%12.50% No8 1
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%0.00% No8 0
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%0.00% No13 0
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%37.50% Yes8 3
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%0.00% No7 0
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%0.00% No9 0
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%25.00% No8 2
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%0.00% No6 0
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%30.00% No10 3
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%11.11% No9 1
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%50.00% Yes4 2
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%33.33% No3 1
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
East Side
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%0.00% No5 0
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 68 305 1 0 Yes 0
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 81 317 0 0 Yes 0
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 49 3 3.96 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 3 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 1 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 64 1 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 4 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
East Side
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%100.00% Yes50 505A 2011 65.0%100.00% Yes68 685A 2012 66.0%92.59% Yes81 75
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes50 0
5B 2011 17.7%0.00% Yes68 0
5B 2012 17.5%2.47% Yes81 2
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes050
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes068
5C 2012 3.6%1.23% Yes181
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.04 1 5 80.0% No
8 2011 86.04 2 6 66.7% No
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
East Side
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2012 87.05 1 6 83.3% No
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%96.3% No26 1
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes2 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
East Side
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Family Foundations
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%0.00% No07
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes1010
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes44
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%0.00% No03
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.0
1 2011 85.0
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Family FoundationsIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes66
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%0.00% No06
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes66
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes44
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes66
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes88
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%75.00% No34
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%83.33% No56
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%0.00% No07
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%90.00% No910
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%100.00% Yes44
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%0.00% No03
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%83.33% No56
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%0.00% No06
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Family Foundations
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%100.00% Yes66
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%100.00% Yes44
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%100.00% Yes66
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes88
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%100.00% Yes44
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%83.33% No56
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes33
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%0.00% No7 0
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%40.00% No10 4
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%100.00% Yes4 4
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%100.00% Yes6 6
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%0.00% No6 0
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%33.33% No6 2
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Family FoundationsIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%0.00% No4 0
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%16.67% No6 1
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%37.50% Yes8 3
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%50.00% Yes4 2
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%20.00% No5 1
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%33.33% No3 1
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%0.00% No7 0
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%40.00% No10 4
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%100.00% Yes4 4
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%80.00% Yes5 4
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%0.00% No6 0
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%33.33% No6 2
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%0.00% No4 0
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%33.33% No6 2
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Family Foundations
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%50.00% Yes8 4
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%75.00% Yes4 3
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%20.00% No5 1
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%66.67% Yes3 2
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 23 577 2 4 Yes 12.54
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 43 717 0 19 Yes 0
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 23 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 6 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 16 2 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Family Foundations
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%96.55% Yes29 285A 2011 65.0%82.61% Yes23 195A 2012 66.0%69.77% Yes43 30
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes29 0
5B 2011 17.7%8.70% Yes23 2
5B 2012 17.5%2.33% Yes43 1
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes029
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes023
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes043
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20114B Hispanic 4 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 3 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Family Foundations
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.02 2 4 50.0% No
8 2011 86.02 0 2 100.0% Yes
8 2012 87.06 1 7 85.7% No
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Family Foundations
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes1 0
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Gateway Lab School
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes1313
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%94.74% No1819
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes1515
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%96.55% No2829
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%95.00% No1920
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%84.62% No1113
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%84.21% No1619
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%100.00% Yes1515
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Gateway Lab School
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%93.10% No2729
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%95.00% No1920
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%23.08% No13 3
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%5.56% No18 1
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%6.67% No15 1
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%17.86% No28 5
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%15.79% No19 3
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%18.18% No11 2
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%0.00% No16 0
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%13.33% No15 2
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%25.93% No27 7
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%26.32% No19 5
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A
Data was not reported for this LEA for FFY 2011.
2012
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Gateway Lab School
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2012 66.0%70.97% Yes62 44
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2012 17.5%9.68% Yes62 6
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2012 3.6%1.61% Yes162
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20114B Afr.Amer. 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Gateway Lab School
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2012 87.016 6 22 72.7% No
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Gateway Lab School
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.00.0 No0 0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Indian River
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.081.3%65 15 No
1 2011 85.086.4%76 12 Yes
1 2012 87.081.9%68 15 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 5.8 No347 20
2 4.42011 0.0 Yes369 12
2 3.82012 2.0 Yes395 8
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 YesNoElem No
3A 2010 NoNoMiddle No
3A 2010 NoNoHigh Sch No
3A 2011 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2011 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2011 YesYesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Indian River
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%82.29% No7996
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes9393
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%97.22% No7072
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%88.12% No89101
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes106106
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes9191
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%87.06% No7485
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes106106
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%98.08% No102104
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%72.81% No83114
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes9999
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%99.02% Yes101102
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%75.00% No84112
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2012 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2012 YesYesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Indian RiverIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes116116
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%97.89% No9395
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%69.23% No81117
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%99.12% Yes112113
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%99.09% Yes109110
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%29.73% No2274
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%102.30% Yes8987
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%94.25% No8287
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%82.29% No7996
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%92.47% No8693
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%97.22% No7072
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%88.12% No89101
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%83.02% No88106
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%100.00% Yes9191
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%87.06% No7485
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%75.47% No80106
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%96.19% No101105
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Indian River
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%72.81% No83114
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%87.76% No8698
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%94.12% No96102
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%74.77% No83111
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%97.44% No114117
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%96.84% No9295
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%69.49% No82118
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%98.21% Yes110112
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes110110
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%28.77% No2173
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%97.75% Yes8789
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%95.40% No8387
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%62.50% No96 60
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%63.44% No93 59
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%79.71% Yes69 55
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Indian RiverIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%57.43% No101 58
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%56.60% No106 60
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%79.12% Yes91 72
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%61.18% No85 52
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%50.00% No106 53
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%59.80% Yes102 61
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%37.72% No114 43
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%54.55% No99 54
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%57.43% Yes101 58
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%41.96% No112 47
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%48.28% No116 56
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%68.82% Yes93 64
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%33.33% No117 39
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%42.48% No113 48
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%62.39% Yes109 68
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%10.96% No73 8
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Indian RiverIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%43.82% No89 39
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%37.80% Yes82 31
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%59.38% No96 57
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%51.61% No93 48
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%84.06% Yes69 58
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%51.49% No101 52
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%37.74% No106 40
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%78.02% Yes91 71
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%61.18% No85 52
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%35.85% No106 38
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%63.37% Yes101 64
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%37.72% No114 43
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%56.12% No98 55
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%59.38% Yes96 57
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%55.86% No111 62
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%42.74% No117 50
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Indian River
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%57.61% Yes92 53
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%39.83% No118 47
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%41.07% No112 46
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%60.00% Yes110 66
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%12.68% No71 9
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%38.20% No89 34
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%44.58% Yes83 37
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 1124 7272 24 63 No 2.57
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 1183 7433 10 36 Yes 1.75
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 3 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 11 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 345 17 3.11 1.32 No
20104B Hispanic 326 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Indian River
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%60.97% No1176 7175A 2011 65.0%56.98% No1160 6615A 2012 66.0%60.61% No1183 717
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%12.41% Yes1176 146
5B 2011 17.7%18.36% No1160 213
5B 2012 17.5%16.31% Yes1183 193
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%9.18% No1081176
5C 2011 3.6%13.36% No1551160
5C 2012 3.6%12.17% No1441183
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 25.61%246 63 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B White 851 8 0.59 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 269 11 4.72 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 12 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 5 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 215 2 1.07 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 26 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 597 11 2.13 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Indian River
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.0201 20 221 91.0% Yes
8 2011 86.0123 12 135 91.1% Yes
8 2012 87.0158 12 170 92.9% Yes
9 2010 Yes 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20117 85.7 91.9 No 67 64.9 Yes 7A - Social/Emotional
20117 94.4 91.9 Yes 62 64.9 No 7B - Knowledge
20117 79.2 91.9 No 76 64.9 Yes 7C - Behavior
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127 92.6 90.6 51.4 60.4 No 7A - Social/Emotional
20127 93.4 93 Yes 44 54.5 No 7B - Knowledge
20127 95.5 91.9 Yes 52.8 65 No 7C - Behavior
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Indian River
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes29 29
12 2011 100.0%98.0% No51 50
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2011 Yes 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 Yes 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes11 0
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes7 0
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes8 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Indian River
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes38 38
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.090.0 No50 45
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.064.0 No63 40
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Kuumba
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%20.00% No15
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes33
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes22
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%0.00% No04
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes22
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes33
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.0
1 2011 85.0
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Kuumba
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%0.00% No05
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes44
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes11
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%20.00% No15
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%100.00% Yes33
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%100.00% Yes22
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%0.00% No04
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%100.00% Yes22
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%0.00% No05
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%100.00% Yes44
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%100.00% Yes11
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%33.33% No3 1
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%50.00% Yes2 1
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Kuumba
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%0.00% No4 0
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%100.00% Yes2 2
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%100.00% Yes3 3
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%50.00% No4 2
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%100.00% Yes1 1
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%100.00% Yes3 3
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%50.00% Yes2 1
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%0.00% No4 0
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%50.00% No2 1
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%33.33% No3 1
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%75.00% No4 3
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%100.00% Yes1 1
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Kuumba
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 7 237 0 1 Yes 0
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 7 250 0 1 Yes 0
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%100.00% Yes15 155A 2011 65.0%100.00% Yes- -5A 2012 66.0%100.00% Yes- -
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 14 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 1 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 7 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Kuumba
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes15 0
5B 2011 17.7%0.00% Yes7 0
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes7 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes015
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes07
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes07
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.00 There were no survey responses from this LEA for FFY 2009.
N/A
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Kuumba
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes6 0
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes5 0
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes1 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Kuumba
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Lake Forest
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.079.3%23 6 No
1 2011 85.083.3%20 4 No
1 2012 87.069.6%16 7 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 6.9 No131 9
2 4.42011 0.0 Yes136 4
2 3.82012 5.7 No123 7
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 YesNoElem No
3A 2010 NoNoMiddle No
3A 2010 High Sch
3A 2011 YesNoElem Yes
3A 2011 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2011 High Sch
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Lake Forest
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%84.78% No3946
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes4242
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes3434
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%89.74% No3539
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes5656
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes5454
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%93.48% No4346
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes4747
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%96.43% No5456
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%87.23% No4147
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%95.92% No4749
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes3939
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%65.96% No3147
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2012 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2012 High Sch
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Lake ForestIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%97.87% No4647
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes4848
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%62.50% No2540
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%97.56% Yes4041
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%97.37% No3738
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%41.38% No1229
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%100.00% Yes3737
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%91.67% No2224
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%84.78% No3946
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%87.18% No3439
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%100.00% Yes3434
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%89.74% No3539
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%98.21% No5556
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%96.30% No5254
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%93.48% No4346
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%100.00% Yes4747
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%94.74% No5457
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Lake Forest
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%87.23% No4147
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%100.00% Yes4949
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes3939
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%65.96% No3147
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%100.00% Yes4747
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%100.00% Yes4848
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%62.50% No2540
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%95.12% No3941
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%97.37% No3738
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%41.38% No1229
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%100.00% Yes3737
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%95.83% Yes2324
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%50.00% No46 23
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%21.43% No42 9
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%47.06% Yes34 16
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Lake ForestIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%23.08% No39 9
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%44.64% No56 25
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%50.00% Yes54 27
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%30.43% No46 14
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%14.89% No47 7
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%41.51% Yes53 22
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%29.79% No47 14
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%16.33% No49 8
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%23.08% No39 9
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%10.64% No47 5
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%31.91% No47 15
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%34.04% No47 16
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%30.00% No40 12
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%21.95% No41 9
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%59.46% Yes37 22
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%3.45% No29 1
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Lake ForestIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%21.62% No37 8
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%36.36% Yes22 8
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%65.22% No46 30
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%20.51% No39 8
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%50.00% Yes34 17
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%25.64% No39 10
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%23.21% No56 13
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%38.46% Yes52 20
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%13.04% No46 6
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%10.64% No47 5
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%41.51% Yes53 22
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%34.04% No47 16
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%22.45% No49 11
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%33.33% No39 13
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%23.40% No47 11
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%17.02% No47 8
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Lake Forest
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%38.30% Yes47 18
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%30.00% No40 12
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%19.51% No41 8
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%54.05% Yes37 20
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%3.45% No29 1
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%21.62% No37 8
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%34.78% No23 8
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 521 3208 13 22 Yes 3.64
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 550 3222 0 17 Yes 0
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 3 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 1 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 184 3 1.81 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 24 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Lake Forest
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%67.95% Yes521 3545A 2011 65.0%67.93% Yes527 3585A 2012 66.0%74.18% Yes550 408
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%11.71% Yes521 61
5B 2011 17.7%9.87% Yes527 52
5B 2012 17.5%10.18% Yes550 56
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.38% Yes2521
5C 2011 3.6%1.90% Yes10527
5C 2012 3.6%0.36% Yes2550
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 100.00%100 100 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B White 403 1 0.28 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 155 9 8.47 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 4 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 28 1 5.21 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 11 1 13.26 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 322 3 1.36 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Lake Forest
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.085 14 99 85.9% No
8 2011 86.075 6 81 92.6% Yes
8 2012 87.087 9 96 90.6% Yes
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20117 85.7 91.9 No 36 64.9 No 7A - Social/Emotional
20117 100 91.9 Yes 18 64.9 No 7B - Knowledge
20117 62.5 91.9 No 58 64.9 No 7C - Behavior
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127 87.5 90.6 No 65.7 60.4 Yes 7A - Social/Emotional
20127 75.8 93 No 42.9 54.5 No 7B - Knowledge
20127 83.3 91.9 No 60 65 No 7C - Behavior
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Lake Forest
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes22 22
12 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes13 13
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes33 0
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes2 0
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Lake Forest
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes19 19
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.096.0 No25 24
13 2011 100.096.0 No67 70
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Las Americas Aspira Academy
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes11
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes11
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%100.00% Yes11
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%100.00% Yes11
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%0.00% No1 0
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%0.00% No1 0
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%0.00% No1 0
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Las Americas Aspira Academy
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%0.00% No1 0
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 0 0 Yes 0
Discipline data was not collected for this LEA for FFY 2011
2011
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2012 66.0%100.00% Yes- -
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes11 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20114B Afr.Amer. 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Las Americas Aspira Academy
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2012 87.03 0 3 100.0% Yes
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2012 100.0% N/A
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Las Americas Aspira Academy
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.00.0 No0 0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Laurel
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.071.4%10 4 No
1 2011 85.078.6%22 6 No
1 2012 87.061.9%13 8 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 5.7 No105 6
2 4.42011 0.1 Yes111 6
2 3.82012 9.5 No84 8
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 NoNoElem No
3A 2010 YesNoMiddle No
3A 2010 High Sch
3A 2011 NoNoElem Yes
3A 2011 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2011 High Sch
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Laurel
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%80.95% No1721
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes1313
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes2222
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%52.94% No917
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes2727
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes1616
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%50.00% No918
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes2525
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%96.00% No2425
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%76.67% No2330
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes2121
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%96.30% No2627
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%86.67% No2630
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2012 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2012 High Sch
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
LaurelIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes3333
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes2020
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%80.65% No2531
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%100.00% Yes3030
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes3333
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%64.29% No1828
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%96.15% Yes2526
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%77.78% No1418
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%80.95% No1721
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%84.62% No1113
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%100.00% Yes2222
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%52.94% No917
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%96.30% No2627
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%100.00% Yes1616
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%47.06% No817
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%100.00% Yes2525
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%100.00% Yes2525
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Laurel
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%76.67% No2330
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%90.48% No1921
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes2727
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%86.67% No2630
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%93.94% No3133
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%95.00% No1920
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%80.65% No2531
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%100.00% Yes3030
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes3333
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%64.29% No1828
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%96.30% Yes2627
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%77.78% No1418
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%23.81% No21 5
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%30.77% No13 4
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%50.00% Yes22 11
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
LaurelIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%5.88% No17 1
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%14.81% No27 4
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%18.75% No16 3
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%16.67% No18 3
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%16.00% No25 4
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%25.00% No24 6
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%43.33% No30 13
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%33.33% No21 7
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%26.92% No26 7
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%16.67% No30 5
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%27.27% No33 9
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%60.00% Yes20 12
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%32.26% No31 10
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%20.00% No30 6
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%51.52% Yes33 17
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%28.57% No28 8
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
LaurelIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%30.77% No26 8
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%50.00% Yes14 7
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%14.29% No21 3
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%23.08% No13 3
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%45.45% Yes22 10
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%5.88% No17 1
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%11.11% No27 3
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%43.75% Yes16 7
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%17.65% No17 3
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%4.00% No25 1
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%40.00% Yes25 10
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%26.67% No30 8
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%28.57% No21 6
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%33.33% No27 9
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%33.33% No30 10
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%21.21% No33 7
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Laurel
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%52.63% Yes19 10
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%35.48% No31 11
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%16.67% No30 5
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%30.30% No33 10
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%32.14% No28 9
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%40.74% No27 11
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%85.71% Yes14 12
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 311 1810 9 10 Yes 7.57
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 298 1835 4 15 Yes 1.64
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 4 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 4 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 111 5 3.47 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 19 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Laurel
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%76.95% Yes295 2275A 2011 65.0%81.03% Yes311 2525A 2012 66.0%80.87% Yes298 241
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%18.31% No295 54
5B 2011 17.7%14.79% Yes311 46
5B 2012 17.5%15.77% Yes298 47
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%3.39% Yes10295
5C 2011 3.6%2.89% Yes9311
5C 2012 3.6%2.68% Yes8298
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 100.00%45 45 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B White 209 3 1.11 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 97 5 9.33 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 17 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 2 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 193 4 3.75 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Laurel
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.026 7 33 78.8% No
8 2011 86.026 5 31 83.9% No
8 2012 87.032 7 39 82.1% No
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20117 100 91.9 Yes 25 64.9 No 7A - Social/Emotional
20117 100 91.9 Yes 15 64.9 No 7B - Knowledge
20117 95 91.9 Yes 45 64.9 No 7C - Behavior
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127 87.5 90.6 No 75 60.4 Yes 7A - Social/Emotional
20127 88.9 93 No 58.3 54.5 Yes 7B - Knowledge
20127 100 91.9 Yes 83.3 65 Yes 7C - Behavior
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Laurel
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes2 2
12 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes4 4
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes11 0
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes26 0
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes33 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Laurel
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes4 4
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.0100.0 Yes25 25
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Milford
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.083.8%31 6 No
1 2011 85.055.6%20 16 No
1 2012 87.074.4%29 10 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 6.4 No172 11
2 4.42011 0.1 Yes173 16
2 3.82012 7.1 No112 8
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 YesNoElem No
3A 2010 YesNoMiddle No
3A 2010 High Sch
3A 2011 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2011 YesNoMiddle Yes
3A 2011 High Sch
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Milford
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%94.00% No4750
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes4343
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%98.25% No5657
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%82.35% No4251
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%98.25% No5657
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes4141
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%69.05% No2942
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%98.28% No5758
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%93.75% No4548
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%90.91% No4044
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes3939
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes5151
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%61.36% No2744
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2012 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2012 High Sch
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
MilfordIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes4848
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes3131
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%59.09% No2644
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%100.00% Yes4545
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes4545
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%73.53% No2534
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%100.00% Yes3838
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%96.67% Yes2930
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%94.00% No4750
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%100.00% Yes4343
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%96.49% No5557
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%82.35% No4251
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%100.00% Yes5757
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%100.00% Yes4040
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%69.05% No2942
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%100.00% Yes5858
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%95.83% No4648
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Milford
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%90.91% No4044
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%97.50% No3940
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes5151
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%61.36% No2744
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%97.96% No4849
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%100.00% Yes3030
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%59.09% No2644
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%93.33% No4245
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes4545
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%73.53% No2534
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%92.11% No3538
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%93.33% No2830
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%62.00% No50 31
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%53.49% No43 23
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%69.64% Yes56 39
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
MilfordIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%45.10% No51 23
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%40.35% No57 23
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%80.49% Yes41 33
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%23.81% No42 10
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%36.21% No58 21
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%86.67% Yes45 39
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%47.73% No44 21
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%30.77% No39 12
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%37.25% Yes51 19
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%20.45% No44 9
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%25.00% No48 12
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%40.00% Yes30 12
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%13.64% No44 6
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%20.00% No45 9
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%42.22% Yes45 19
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%15.15% No33 5
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
MilfordIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%28.95% No38 11
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%31.03% No29 9
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%70.00% No50 35
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%48.84% No43 21
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%69.09% Yes55 38
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%47.06% No51 24
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%36.84% No57 21
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%82.50% Yes40 33
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%30.95% No42 13
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%32.76% No58 19
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%95.65% Yes46 44
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%31.82% No44 14
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%22.50% No40 9
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%21.57% No51 11
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%18.18% No44 8
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%26.53% No49 13
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Milford
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%46.67% Yes30 14
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%15.91% No44 7
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%20.00% No45 9
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%31.11% No45 14
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%12.12% No33 4
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%28.95% No38 11
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%28.57% No28 8
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 575 3452 3 4 Yes 7.5
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 572 3520 10 14 Yes 4.4
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 5 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 227 2 0.98 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 77 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Milford
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%75.13% Yes567 4265A 2011 65.0%75.49% Yes567 4285A 2012 66.0%77.10% Yes572 441
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%17.28% Yes567 98
5B 2011 17.7%17.99% No567 102
5B 2012 17.5%12.41% Yes572 71
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%4.06% No23567
5C 2011 3.6%2.12% Yes12567
5C 2012 3.6%1.57% Yes9572
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 100.00%59 59 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B White 349 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 190 2 9.08 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 6 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 3 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 77 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 13 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 286 1 3.02 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Milford
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.099 12 111 89.2% Yes
8 2011 86.081 7 88 92.0% Yes
8 2012 87.065 18 83 78.3% No
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20117 96.4 91.9 Yes 68 64.9 Yes 7A - Social/Emotional
20117 100 91.9 Yes 68 64.9 Yes 7B - Knowledge
20117 89.3 91.9 No 82 64.9 Yes 7C - Behavior
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127 96.3 90.6 Yes 75 60.4 Yes 7A - Social/Emotional
20127 96.2 93 Yes 75 54.5 Yes 7B - Knowledge
20127 100 91.9 Yes 91.7 65 Yes 7C - Behavior
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Milford
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes25 25
12 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes14 14
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes22 0
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes6 0
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes2 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Milford
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes6 6
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.0100.0 Yes25 25
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.033.0 No66 22
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
MOT Charter
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes11
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes44
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes44
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%0.00% No03
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.0
1 2011 85.0
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
MOT CharterIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes22
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes44
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%50.00% No36
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes11
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes11
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%20.00% No15
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes66
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%37.50% No38
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes33
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes55
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%40.00% No25
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%100.00% Yes66
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes11
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%100.00% Yes11
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%75.00% No34
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%100.00% Yes44
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%0.00% No03
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
MOT Charter
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%100.00% Yes22
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%75.00% No34
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%50.00% No36
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%100.00% Yes11
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%100.00% Yes11
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%20.00% No15
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%83.33% No56
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%37.50% No38
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%100.00% Yes33
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%80.00% No45
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%40.00% No25
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%83.33% No56
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes11
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%0.00% No1 0
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%0.00% No4 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
MOT CharterIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%50.00% Yes4 2
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%75.00% Yes4 3
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%0.00% No6 0
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%0.00% No1 0
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%100.00% Yes1 1
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%33.33% No6 2
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%0.00% No8 0
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%66.67% Yes3 2
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%40.00% Yes5 2
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%20.00% No5 1
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%50.00% Yes6 3
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%0.00% No1 0
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%0.00% No1 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
MOT CharterIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%0.00% No4 0
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%75.00% Yes4 3
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%66.67% Yes3 2
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%0.00% No6 0
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%0.00% No1 0
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%100.00% Yes1 1
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%33.33% No6 2
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%37.50% No8 3
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%100.00% Yes3 3
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%25.00% No4 1
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%40.00% No5 2
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%33.33% No6 2
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%100.00% Yes1 1
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
MOT Charter
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 54 607 0 1 Yes 0
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 52 630 0 0 Yes 0
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%98.15% Yes54 535A 2011 65.0%100.00% Yes54 545A 2012 66.0%100.00% Yes52 52
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 4 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 7 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 3 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 49 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 5 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 3 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 3 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 43 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
MOT Charter
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes54 0
5B 2011 17.7%0.00% Yes54 0
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes52 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes054
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes054
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes052
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.00 There were no survey responses from this LEA for FFY 2009.
N/A
8 2011 86.016 1 17 94.1% Yes
8 2012 87.015 2 17 88.2% Yes
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
MOT Charter
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
MOT Charter
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.0100.0 Yes1 1
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Moyer Academy
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%33.33% No39
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes33
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes66
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%13.04% No323
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.025.0%1 3 No
1 2011 85.0
1 2012 87.0100.0%8 0 Yes
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 9.1 No55 5
2 4.42011 0.0 Yes57 0
2 3.82012 31.0 No29 9
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Moyer AcademyIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%5.00% No120
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%100.00% Yes1414
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes55
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%0.00% No018
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%80.00% No810
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%33.33% No39
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%66.67% No23
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%83.33% No56
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%13.04% No323
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%20.00% No15
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%5.00% No120
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%35.71% No514
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%20.00% No15
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Moyer Academy
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%0.00% No018
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%0.00% No011
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%33.33% No13
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%11.11% No9 1
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%0.00% No7 0
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%0.00% No23 0
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%0.00% No20 0
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%0.00% No14 0
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%0.00% No16 0
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%0.00% No10 0
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%0.00% No2 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Moyer Academy
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%22.22% No9 2
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%16.67% No6 1
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%0.00% No23 0
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%0.00% No3 0
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%0.00% No20 0
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%0.00% No14 0
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%0.00% No1 0
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%0.00% No17 0
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%0.00% No11 0
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%0.00% No2 0
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 17 146 0 23 Yes 0
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Moyer Academy
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 17 148 5 10 Yes 4.35
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%100.00% Yes102 1025A 2011 65.0%88.24% Yes17 155A 2012 66.0%100.00% Yes17 17
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes102 0
5B 2011 17.7%5.88% Yes17 1
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 100 9 0.31 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 2 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 17 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Moyer Academy
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes17 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes0102
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes017
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes017
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.03 2 5 60.0% No
8 2011 86.03 0 3 100.0% Yes
8 2012 87.01 2 3 33.3% No
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Moyer Academy
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Moyer Academy
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.072.0 No25 18
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
NCC Votech
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%61.60% No77125
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.096.0%119 5 Yes
1 2011 85.092.0%103 9 Yes
1 2012 87.088.2%105 14 Yes
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 2.0 Yes507 10
2 4.42011 0.0 Yes532 9
2 3.82012 1.8 Yes548 10
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 NoNoHigh Sch No
3A 2011 YesYesHigh Sch Yes
3A 2012 YesYesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
NCC Votech
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%100.00% Yes131131
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%99.26% Yes135136
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%61.60% No77125
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%100.00% Yes131131
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%100.00% Yes136136
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%20.49% No122 25
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%35.11% No131 46
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%67.41% Yes135 91
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%17.21% No122 21
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%41.98% No131 55
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%52.94% Yes136 72
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 504 4170 1 13 Yes 0.64
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 514 4211 3 22 Yes 1.12
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
NCC Votech
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%43.94% No503 2215A 2011 65.0%69.05% Yes504 3485A 2012 66.0%81.71% Yes514 420
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%2.98% Yes503 15
5B 2011 17.7%1.98% Yes504 10
5B 2012 17.5%8.37% Yes514 43
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.40% Yes2503
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes0504
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 2 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 183 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 54 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 264 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 192 2 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 46 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 265 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
NCC Votech
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes0514
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.079 11 90 87.8% Yes
8 2011 86.065 6 71 91.5% Yes
8 2012 87.072 5 77 93.5% Yes
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
NCC Votech
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
NCC VotechIndicator School
Year% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.088.0 No75 66
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.055.0 No100 55
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Newark Charter
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%84.62% No1113
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes1515
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes88
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%66.67% No1015
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.0
1 2011 85.0
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Newark CharterIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes1818
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes1515
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%30.00% No310
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes1515
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes1515
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%66.67% No46
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes99
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes1212
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%22.22% No29
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes88
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%62.50% No58
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%100.00% Yes44
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes55
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%84.62% No1113
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%100.00% Yes1515
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%100.00% Yes88
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Newark Charter
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%66.67% No1015
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%100.00% Yes1818
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%100.00% Yes1515
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%30.00% No310
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%93.33% No1415
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%100.00% Yes1515
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%66.67% No46
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%100.00% Yes99
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes1212
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%22.22% No29
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%100.00% Yes88
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%62.50% No58
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%100.00% Yes44
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes55
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%53.85% No13 7
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Newark CharterIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%66.67% No15 10
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%87.50% Yes8 7
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%40.00% No15 6
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%83.33% Yes18 15
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%93.33% Yes15 14
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%30.00% No10 3
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%53.33% No15 8
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%46.67% Yes15 7
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%66.67% Yes6 4
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%55.56% No9 5
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%58.33% Yes12 7
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%22.22% No9 2
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%40.00% No5 2
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%62.50% Yes8 5
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%50.00% Yes8 4
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%75.00% Yes4 3
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Newark CharterIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%100.00% Yes5 5
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%53.85% No13 7
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%46.67% No15 7
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%87.50% Yes8 7
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%53.33% No15 8
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%44.44% No18 8
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%93.33% Yes15 14
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%30.00% No10 3
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%40.00% No15 6
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%46.67% Yes15 7
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%66.67% Yes6 4
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%66.67% No9 6
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%75.00% Yes12 9
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%22.22% No9 2
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%40.00% No5 2
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%87.50% Yes8 7
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Newark Charter
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%50.00% No8 4
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%75.00% Yes4 3
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%80.00% Yes5 4
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 72 1230 0 0 Yes 0
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 88 1253 0 0 Yes 0
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 1 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 3 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 13 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 1 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 68 1 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 10 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 4 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 2 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 4 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Newark Charter
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%77.11% Yes83 645A 2011 65.0%66.67% Yes72 485A 2012 66.0%69.32% Yes88 61
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%2.41% Yes83 2
5B 2011 17.7%0.00% Yes72 0
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes88 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes083
5C 2011 3.6%1.39% Yes172
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes088
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 52 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Newark Charter
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.00 There were no survey responses from this LEA for FFY 2009.
N/A
8 2011 86.026 3 29 89.7% Yes
8 2012 87.034 4 38 89.5% Yes
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Newark Charter
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Odyssey Charter
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%50.00% No24
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes33
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes66
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%50.00% No12
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes44
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes33
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.0
1 2011 85.0
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Odyssey Charter
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%0.00% No02
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes11
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes44
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%50.00% No24
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%100.00% Yes33
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%100.00% Yes66
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%50.00% No12
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%75.00% No34
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%0.00% No02
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%100.00% Yes11
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%75.00% No34
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%50.00% No4 2
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%83.33% Yes6 5
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Odyssey Charter
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%50.00% No2 1
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%50.00% No4 2
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%100.00% Yes1 1
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%100.00% Yes4 4
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%50.00% No4 2
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%66.67% Yes6 4
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%50.00% No2 1
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%50.00% No4 2
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%0.00% No3 0
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%0.00% No1 0
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%66.67% Yes3 2
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Odyssey Charter
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 34 391 0 0 Yes 0
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 42 468 0 0 Yes 0
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%100.00% Yes23 235A 2011 65.0%100.00% Yes34 345A 2012 66.0%100.00% Yes42 42
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 8 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 1 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 16 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 11 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 23 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Odyssey Charter
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes23 0
5B 2011 17.7%0.00% Yes34 0
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes42 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes023
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes034
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes042
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.00 There were no survey responses from this LEA for FFY 2009.
N/A
8 2011 86.010 0 10 100.0% Yes
8 2012 87.017 0 17 100.0% Yes
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Odyssey Charter
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes11 0
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Odyssey Charter
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Polytech
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%90.00% No2730
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.096.9%31 1 Yes
1 2011 85.071.9%23 9 No
1 2012 87.092.9%26 2 Yes
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 0.0 Yes110 0
2 4.42011 0.0 Yes103 0
2 3.82012 1.9 Yes104 2
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 High Sch
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2010.
3A 2011 High Sch
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2009.
3A 2012 High Sch
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Polytech
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%100.00% Yes2626
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%100.00% Yes2222
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%90.00% No2730
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%96.15% Yes2526
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%100.00% Yes2222
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%6.67% No30 2
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%57.69% Yes26 15
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%59.09% Yes22 13
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%6.67% No30 2
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%65.38% Yes26 17
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%31.82% No22 7
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 102 1081 0 0 Yes 0
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 106 1076 0 1 Yes 0
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Polytech
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%80.73% Yes109 885A 2011 65.0%83.33% Yes102 855A 2012 66.0%79.25% Yes106 84
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes109 0
5B 2011 17.7%0.00% Yes102 0
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes106 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes0109
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes0102
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 2 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 2 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 24 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 5 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 76 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 22 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 2 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 5 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 8 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 64 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Polytech
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2012 3.6%0.94% Yes1106
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.017 5 22 77.3% No
8 2011 86.015 0 15 100.0% Yes
8 2012 87.016 2 18 88.9% Yes
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Polytech
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes1 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
PolytechIndicator School
Year% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.0100.0 Yes25 25
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Positive Outcomes
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes1010
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes1010
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%91.67% No1112
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes99
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.085.7%6 1 Yes
1 2011 85.085.7%6 1 Yes
1 2012 87.0100.0%11 0 Yes
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 7.8 No51 4
2 4.42011 0.0 Yes85 3
2 3.82012 2.1 Yes47 1
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Positive Outcomes
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%100.00% Yes1111
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes1515
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%100.00% Yes1818
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%100.00% Yes1313
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%100.00% Yes1010
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%100.00% Yes1010
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%100.00% Yes1010
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%91.67% No1112
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes99
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%100.00% Yes1111
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes1515
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%100.00% Yes1818
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%100.00% Yes1313
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%100.00% Yes1010
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%30.00% No10 3
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%30.00% No10 3
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Positive OutcomesIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%36.36% Yes11 4
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%11.11% No9 1
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%18.18% No11 2
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%40.00% Yes15 6
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%27.78% No18 5
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%7.69% No13 1
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%20.00% No10 2
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%30.00% No10 3
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%30.00% No10 3
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%36.36% Yes11 4
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%22.22% No9 2
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%18.18% No11 2
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%46.67% Yes15 7
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%27.78% No18 5
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%7.69% No13 1
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%30.00% No10 3
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Positive Outcomes
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 63 49 0 3 Yes 0
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 74 52 2 1 Yes 1.41
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%100.00% Yes70 705A 2011 65.0%100.00% Yes63 635A 2012 66.0%100.00% Yes74 74
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 2 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 22 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 2 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 44 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 16 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 2 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 44 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Positive Outcomes
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes70 0
5B 2011 17.7%0.00% Yes63 0
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes74 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes070
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes063
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes074
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.015 1 16 93.8% Yes
8 2011 86.08 0 8 100.0% Yes
8 2012 87.012 2 14 85.7% No
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Positive Outcomes
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Positive Outcomes
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.064.0 No25 16
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.074.0 No19 14
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Prestige Academy
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%0.00% No09
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes1212
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes1414
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%0.00% No013
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes1414
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes1414
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes88
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes1010
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes77
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Prestige Academy
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%0.00% No09
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%91.67% No1112
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%85.71% No1214
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%0.00% No013
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%100.00% Yes1414
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes1414
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%100.00% Yes88
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%100.00% Yes1010
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes77
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%0.00% No9 0
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%16.67% No12 2
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%21.43% No14 3
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%0.00% No13 0
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%28.57% No14 4
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%14.29% No14 2
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Prestige Academy
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%37.50% No8 3
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%50.00% Yes10 5
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%57.14% Yes7 4
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%0.00% No9 0
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%0.00% No12 0
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%8.33% No12 1
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%0.00% No13 0
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%35.71% No14 5
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%7.14% No14 1
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%25.00% No8 2
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%40.00% Yes10 4
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%28.57% No7 2
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 35 250 3 15 Yes 1.43
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Prestige Academy
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 15 206 2 15 Yes 2.75
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2011 65.0%93.33% Yes15 145A 2012 66.0%94.29% Yes35 33
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
2011 0.00% 15 0
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes35 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
2011 0.00% 015
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 14 2 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Prestige Academy
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes035
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.01 0 1 100.0% Yes
8 2011 86.00 1 1 0.0% No
8 2012 87.06 1 7 85.7% No
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Prestige Academy
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Providence Creek
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%50.00% No12
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes55
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%50.00% No12
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes22
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.0
1 2011 85.0
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Providence CreekIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes55
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%83.33% No56
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes22
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes66
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes33
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%55.56% No59
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes77
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%63.64% No711
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes55
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%50.00% No12
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%20.00% No15
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%50.00% No12
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%50.00% No12
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Providence Creek
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%100.00% Yes55
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%83.33% No56
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%50.00% No12
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes66
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%100.00% Yes33
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%55.56% No59
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%100.00% Yes77
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%63.64% No711
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes55
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%0.00% No5 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Providence CreekIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%50.00% No2 1
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%16.67% No6 1
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%50.00% No2 1
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%33.33% No3 1
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%16.67% No6 1
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%33.33% No3 1
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%11.11% No9 1
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%14.29% No7 1
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%0.00% No11 0
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%20.00% No5 1
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%0.00% No2 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Providence CreekIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%0.00% No5 0
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%16.67% No6 1
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%66.67% Yes3 2
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%33.33% No6 2
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%0.00% No3 0
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%33.33% No3 1
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%22.22% No9 2
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%57.14% No7 4
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%0.00% No3 0
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%0.00% No11 0
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%60.00% Yes5 3
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Providence Creek
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 38 652 0 1 Yes 0
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 29 658 0 0 Yes 0
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%100.00% Yes49 495A 2011 65.0%100.00% Yes38 385A 2012 66.0%100.00% Yes29 29
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 1 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 13 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 1 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 36 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 13 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 2 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 23 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Providence Creek
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes49 0
5B 2011 17.7%0.00% Yes38 0
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes29 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes049
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes038
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes029
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.00 There were no survey responses from this LEA for FFY 2009.
N/A
8 2011 86.00 1 1 0.0% No
8 2012 87.05 2 7 71.4% No
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Providence Creek
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes4 0
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes3 0
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes3 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Providence Creek
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Reach Academy for Girls
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes44
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes22
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes55
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes77
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes33
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%0.00% No04
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%100.00% Yes22
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%40.00% No25
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%57.14% No47
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%33.33% No13
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Reach Academy for Girls
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%75.00% Yes4 3
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%100.00% Yes2 2
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%0.00% No5 0
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%14.29% No7 1
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%66.67% Yes3 2
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%0.00% No4 0
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%0.00% No2 0
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%20.00% No5 1
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%0.00% No4 0
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%100.00% Yes1 1
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 6 252 0 1 Yes 0
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20114B Afr.Amer. 4 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Reach Academy for Girls
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2012 66.0%100.00% Yes- -
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes6 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes06
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Reach Academy for Girls
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2011 86.00 2 2 0.0% No
8 2012 87.00 0 0 0.0% No survey data was captured for this LEA
for the FFY 2011
N/A
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Reach Academy for Girls
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.00.0 No0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Red Clay
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.076.2%77 24 No
1 2011 85.065.1%95 51 No
1 2012 87.067.8%61 29 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 4.2 Yes551 23
2 4.42011 0.1 Yes586 51
2 3.82012 5.3 No549 29
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 NoNoElem No
3A 2010 NoNoMiddle No
3A 2010 YesNoHigh Sch No
3A 2011 NoYesElem Yes
3A 2011 NoNoMiddle Yes
3A 2011 YesYesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Red Clay
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%67.65% No115170
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%98.90% No180182
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes156156
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%76.04% No146192
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%97.61% No204209
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes168168
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%69.70% No138198
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%99.53% Yes211212
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes189189
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%65.74% No142216
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%99.52% Yes208209
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%99.46% Yes183184
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%63.81% No134210
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2012 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2012 YesNoHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Red ClayIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%98.14% No211215
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%98.95% Yes189191
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%64.92% No124191
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%98.94% Yes187189
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%97.07% No199205
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%40.87% No47115
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%95.12% No117123
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%83.85% No109130
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%67.65% No115170
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%87.43% No160183
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%93.51% No144154
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%76.04% No146192
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%85.58% No178208
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%91.67% No154168
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%69.70% No138198
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%89.57% No189211
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%93.12% No176189
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Red Clay
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%65.28% No141216
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%99.04% Yes207209
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%97.83% No180184
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%63.81% No134210
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%98.14% No211215
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%97.88% No185189
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%64.40% No123191
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%98.94% Yes187189
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%97.56% No200205
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%40.87% No47115
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%96.75% Yes119123
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%84.50% No109129
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%18.24% No170 31
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%14.29% No182 26
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%18.71% No155 29
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Red ClayIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%18.23% No192 35
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%13.40% No209 28
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%18.45% No168 31
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%19.70% No198 39
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%12.26% No212 26
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%20.21% No188 38
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%18.78% No213 40
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%12.44% No209 26
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%17.49% No183 32
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%15.87% No208 33
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%13.95% No215 30
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%16.40% No189 31
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%16.75% No191 32
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%13.76% No189 26
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%29.15% No199 58
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%12.61% No111 14
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Red ClayIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%17.89% No123 22
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%14.95% No107 16
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%18.24% No170 31
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%13.11% No183 24
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%23.08% No143 33
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%19.27% No192 37
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%16.83% No208 35
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%22.73% No154 35
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%25.76% No198 51
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%15.64% No211 33
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%28.98% No176 51
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%14.62% No212 31
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%14.35% No209 30
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%21.67% No180 39
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%19.32% No207 40
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%10.70% No215 23
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Red Clay
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%19.46% No185 36
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%18.52% No189 35
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%13.76% No189 26
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%26.00% No200 52
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%10.91% No110 12
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%21.14% No123 26
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%14.95% No107 16
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 2172 13429 65 213 No 2
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 2163 13837 46 174 No 1.69
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 3 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 41 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 814 52 4.76 1.32 No
20104B Hispanic 501 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Red Clay
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%36.72% No2119 7785A 2011 65.0%42.85% No2168 9295A 2012 66.0%52.57% No2163 1137
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%18.40% No2119 390
5B 2011 17.7%15.08% Yes2168 327
5B 2012 17.5%13.82% Yes2163 299
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%9.06% No1922119
5C 2011 3.6%9.69% No2102168
5C 2012 3.6%10.45% No2262163
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 93.75%160 150 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B White 957 22 1.71 1.32 No
20114B Afr.Amer. 780 45 3.64 1.3 No
20114B AI/AK 3 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 41 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 470 7 0.94 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 8 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 870 13 0.94 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Red Clay
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.0295 55 350 84.3% No
8 2011 86.0205 50 255 80.4% No
8 2012 87.0271 48 319 85.0% No
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20117 73.9 91.9 No 26 64.9 No 7A - Social/Emotional
20117 100 91.9 Yes 13 64.9 No 7B - Knowledge
20117 84.2 91.9 No 26 64.9 No 7C - Behavior
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127 75.4 90.6 No 28.4 60.4 No 7A - Social/Emotional
20127 76.6 93 No 47.8 54.5 No 7B - Knowledge
20127 70.7 91.9 No 43.3 65 No 7C - Behavior
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Red Clay
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes28 28
12 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes70 70
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes9 0
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes4 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Red Clay
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes66 66
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.080.0 No50 40
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Seaford
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.060.9%14 9 No
1 2011 85.0100.0%17 0 Yes
1 2012 87.077.1%27 8 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 5.2 Yes135 7
2 4.42011 0.0 Yes143 7
2 3.82012 6.5 No123 8
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 NoNoElem No
3A 2010 NoNoMiddle No
3A 2010 High Sch
3A 2011 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2011 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2011 High Sch
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Seaford
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%89.13% No4146
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes4646
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes4141
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%77.78% No4254
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%98.18% No5455
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes4444
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%76.27% No4559
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%98.21% No5556
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes5656
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%83.72% No3643
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes5252
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes4747
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%85.37% No3541
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2012 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2012 High Sch
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
SeafordIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes2929
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%97.87% No4647
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%78.26% No3646
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%100.00% Yes3939
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%95.83% No2324
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%91.43% No3235
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%100.00% Yes3535
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%96.15% Yes2526
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%89.13% No4146
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%82.61% No3846
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%87.80% No3641
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%77.78% No4254
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%83.33% No4554
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%90.91% No4044
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%76.27% No4559
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%85.71% No4856
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%89.29% No5056
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Seaford
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%85.71% No3642
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%100.00% Yes5252
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%95.74% No4547
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%85.37% No3541
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%89.66% No2629
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%97.87% No4647
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%78.26% No3646
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%100.00% Yes3939
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%91.67% No2224
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%91.43% No3235
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%97.14% Yes3435
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%92.31% No2426
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%30.43% No46 14
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%34.78% No46 16
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%36.59% Yes41 15
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
SeafordIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%33.33% No54 18
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%23.64% No55 13
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%30.95% No42 13
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%30.51% No59 18
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%19.64% No56 11
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%30.91% No55 17
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%23.81% No42 10
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%15.38% No52 8
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%28.26% No46 13
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%24.39% No41 10
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%20.69% No29 6
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%32.61% No46 15
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%30.43% No46 14
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%43.59% No39 17
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%34.78% No23 8
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%28.57% No35 10
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
SeafordIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%28.57% No35 10
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%56.00% Yes25 14
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%28.26% No46 13
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%23.91% No46 11
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%33.33% No36 12
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%27.78% No54 15
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%14.81% No54 8
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%36.84% Yes38 14
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%28.81% No59 17
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%19.64% No56 11
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%28.00% No50 14
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%28.57% No42 12
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%17.31% No52 9
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%38.64% Yes44 17
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%31.71% No41 13
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%20.69% No29 6
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Seaford
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%36.96% Yes46 17
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%30.43% No46 14
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%33.33% No39 13
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%40.91% Yes22 9
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%31.43% No35 11
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%34.29% No35 12
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%58.33% Yes24 14
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 514 2832 10 30 Yes 1.1
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 519 2870 2 27 Yes 0.41
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 1 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 4 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 282 3 0.68 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 41 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Seaford
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%83.05% Yes531 4415A 2011 65.0%84.41% Yes513 4335A 2012 66.0%82.85% Yes519 430
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%7.53% Yes531 40
5B 2011 17.7%8.38% Yes513 43
5B 2012 17.5%9.83% Yes519 51
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.75% Yes4531
5C 2011 3.6%0.19% Yes1513
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes0519
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 100.00%80 80 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B White 281 1 0.23 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 229 8 3.30 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 3 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 36 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 15 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 230 2 0.82 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Seaford
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.079 11 90 87.8% Yes
8 2011 86.054 11 65 83.1% No
8 2012 87.064 6 70 91.4% Yes
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20117 100 91.9 Yes 37 64.9 No 7A - Social/Emotional
20117 100 91.9 Yes 47 64.9 No 7B - Knowledge
20117 100 91.9 Yes 47 64.9 No 7C - Behavior
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127 100 90.6 Yes 100 60.4 Yes 7A - Social/Emotional
20127 100 93 Yes 100 54.5 Yes 7B - Knowledge
20127 100 91.9 Yes 100 65 Yes 7C - Behavior
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Seaford
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes6 6
12 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes7 7
12 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes8 8
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%98.3% Yes58 1
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes35 0
11 2012 100.0%90.5% No19 2
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Seaford
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.0100.0 Yes25 25
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Smyrna
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.087.8%36 5 Yes
1 2011 85.067.3%37 18 No
1 2012 87.085.7%42 7 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 3.4 Yes208 7
2 4.42011 0.0 Yes220 5
2 3.82012 3.2 Yes218 7
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 NoNoElem No
3A 2010 NoNoMiddle No
3A 2010 High Sch
3A 2011 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2011 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2011 YesYesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Smyrna
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%75.51% No3749
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes5656
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes4545
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%67.39% No3146
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%98.36% No6061
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%96.61% No5759
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%75.76% No5066
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes4545
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes5959
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%89.36% No4247
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes6565
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%98.04% No5051
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%36.36% No2055
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2012 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2012 YesYesHigh Sch Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
SmyrnaIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes5151
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%95.59% No6568
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%24.29% No1770
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%98.15% Yes5354
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes4949
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%41.18% No2151
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%100.00% Yes5656
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%98.41% Yes6263
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%73.47% No3649
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%82.14% No4656
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%97.78% No4445
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%67.39% No3146
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%81.97% No5061
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%94.92% No5659
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%75.76% No5066
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%93.33% No4245
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%100.00% Yes5959
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Smyrna
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%89.36% No4247
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%96.97% No6466
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%98.00% No4950
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%36.36% No2055
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%90.20% No4651
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%95.59% No6568
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%24.29% No1770
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%88.89% No4854
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes4949
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%41.18% No2151
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%96.43% Yes5456
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%98.41% Yes6263
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%46.94% No49 23
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%35.71% No56 20
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%37.78% Yes45 17
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
SmyrnaIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%21.74% No46 10
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%24.59% No61 15
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%45.61% Yes57 26
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%33.33% No66 22
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%20.00% No45 9
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%37.29% Yes59 22
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%38.30% No47 18
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%22.73% No66 15
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%32.65% No49 16
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%3.70% No54 2
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%19.61% No51 10
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%40.00% Yes65 26
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%10.00% No70 7
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%29.63% No54 16
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%44.90% Yes49 22
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%10.00% No50 5
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
SmyrnaIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%19.64% No56 11
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%30.65% No62 19
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%39.58% No48 19
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%26.79% No56 15
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%29.55% No44 13
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%28.26% No46 13
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%21.31% No61 13
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%48.21% Yes56 27
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%45.45% No66 30
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%15.56% No45 7
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%37.29% Yes59 22
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%23.40% No47 11
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%34.85% No66 23
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%39.58% Yes48 19
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%15.09% No53 8
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%15.69% No51 8
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Smyrna
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%46.15% Yes65 30
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%8.57% No70 6
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%18.52% No54 10
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%22.45% No49 11
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%8.00% No50 4
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%21.43% No56 12
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%29.03% No62 18
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 670 4151 12 41 Yes 2.12
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 700 4302 12 37 Yes 1.99
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 1 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 9 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 231 3 1.35 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 35 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Smyrna
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%59.85% No665 3985A 2011 65.0%74.56% Yes574 4285A 2012 66.0%64.88% No692 449
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%21.05% No665 140
5B 2011 17.7%23.17% No574 133
5B 2012 17.5%22.69% No692 157
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.75% Yes5665
5C 2011 3.6%2.26% Yes13574
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes0692
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 100.00%105 105 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B White 493 5 1.05 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 220 7 3.22 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 9 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 25 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 414 5 1.22 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Smyrna
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.098 20 118 83.1% No
8 2011 86.076 11 87 87.4% Yes
8 2012 87.0113 18 131 86.3% No
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20117 72.7 91.9 No 82 64.9 Yes 7A - Social/Emotional
20117 92.6 91.9 Yes 70 64.9 Yes 7B - Knowledge
20117 45 91.9 No 100 64.9 Yes 7C - Behavior
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127 80 90.6 No 72.4 60.4 Yes 7A - Social/Emotional
20127 83.3 93 No 86.2 54.5 Yes 7B - Knowledge
20127 76.5 91.9 No 79.3 65 Yes 7C - Behavior
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Smyrna
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes17 17
12 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes19 19
12 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes17 17
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes21 0
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes79 0
11 2012 100.0%89.8% No79 9
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Smyrna
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.0100.0 Yes25 25
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Sussex Academy
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%87.50% No78
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes99
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes44
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%66.67% No23
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.0
1 2011 85.0
1 2012 87.0
Data was not reported for this FFY.
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Sussex Academy
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes88
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes66
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%57.14% No47
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%100.00% Yes22
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes55
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%87.50% No78
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%88.89% No89
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes44
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%66.67% No23
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%100.00% Yes88
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%83.33% No56
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%57.14% No47
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%100.00% Yes22
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes55
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%62.50% Yes8 5
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%55.56% No9 5
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Sussex AcademyIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%25.00% No4 1
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%33.33% No3 1
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%87.50% Yes8 7
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%100.00% Yes6 6
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%57.14% Yes7 4
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%100.00% Yes5 5
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%75.00% Yes8 6
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%55.56% No9 5
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%100.00% Yes4 4
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%33.33% No3 1
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%75.00% Yes8 6
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%100.00% Yes5 5
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%57.14% No7 4
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%50.00% No2 1
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%100.00% Yes5 5
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Sussex Academy
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 16 307 0 0 Yes 0
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 17 318 1 1 Yes 18.71
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%100.00% Yes17 175A 2011 65.0%13.91% No115 165A 2012 66.0%100.00% Yes17 17
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 3 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 14 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 13 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Sussex Academy
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes17 0
5B 2011 17.7%0.00% Yes115 0
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes17 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes017
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes0115
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes017
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.03 0 3 100.0% Yes
8 2011 86.03 2 5 60.0% No
8 2012 87.04 2 6 66.7% No
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Sussex Academy
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes2 0
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes1 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Sussex Academy
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2012 100.00.0 No2 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Sussex Technical
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%73.33% No2230
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.095.7%22 1 Yes
1 2011 85.0100.0%27 0 Yes
1 2012 87.0100.0%31 0 Yes
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 1.8 Yes109 2
2 4.42011 0.0 Yes118 0
2 3.82012 0.0 Yes115 0
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 High Sch
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2009.
3A 2011 High Sch
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2010.
3A 2012 High Sch
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Sussex Technical
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%100.00% Yes3333
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%100.00% Yes3737
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%73.33% No2230
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%100.00% Yes3333
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%100.00% Yes3737
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%30.00% No30 9
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%60.61% Yes33 20
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%59.46% Yes37 22
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%36.67% No30 11
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%48.48% No33 16
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%37.84% Yes37 14
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 93 1177 0 3 Yes 0
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 114 1194 1 2 Yes 5.24
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Sussex Technical
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%76.64% Yes107 825A 2011 65.0%80.65% Yes93 755A 2012 66.0%87.83% Yes115 101
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.93% Yes107 1
5B 2011 17.7%1.08% Yes93 1
5B 2012 17.5%0.87% Yes115 1
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes0107
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes093
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 1 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 1 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 18 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 5 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 82 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 14 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 2 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 8 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 68 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Sussex Technical
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes0115
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.021 0 21 100.0% Yes
8 2011 86.019 1 20 95.0% Yes
8 2012 87.018 1 19 94.7% Yes
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Sussex Technical
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2011 100.0% N/A0 0
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
11 2012 100.0% N/A
No initial evaluation data was reported during this reporting period for this district or charter.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Sussex TechnicalIndicator School
Year% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.096.0 No25 24
13 2011 100.041.0 No9 22
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Thomas Edison
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%0.00% No010
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes22
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes99
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%0.00% No07
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes1212
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes55
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.0
1 2011 85.0
1 2012 87.0
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 3.82012
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 All
AYP was not calculated for this LEA in FFY 2011.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Thomas EdisonIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%16.67% No16
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes66
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes1212
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%0.00% No04
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes66
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes66
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%0.00% No02
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%100.00% Yes77
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%0.00% No02
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%100.00% Yes22
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes44
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%0.00% No010
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%50.00% No12
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%77.78% No79
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%0.00% No07
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%66.67% No812
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Thomas Edison
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%60.00% No35
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%16.67% No16
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%50.00% No36
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%91.67% No1112
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%0.00% No04
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%83.33% No56
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%66.67% No46
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%0.00% No02
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%85.71% No67
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%100.00% Yes33
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%0.00% No02
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%100.00% Yes22
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes44
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%0.00% No10 0
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%0.00% No2 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Thomas EdisonIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%11.11% No9 1
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%0.00% No7 0
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%16.67% No12 2
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%40.00% Yes5 2
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%0.00% No6 0
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%33.33% No6 2
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%50.00% Yes12 6
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%0.00% No4 0
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%33.33% No6 2
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%66.67% Yes6 4
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%57.14% Yes7 4
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%33.33% No3 1
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%50.00% Yes2 1
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%100.00% Yes4 4
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Thomas EdisonIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%0.00% No10 0
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%42.86% Yes7 3
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%0.00% No7 0
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%16.67% No12 2
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%0.00% No3 0
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%0.00% No6 0
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%0.00% No6 0
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%54.55% Yes11 6
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%0.00% No4 0
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%33.33% No6 2
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%50.00% Yes4 2
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%0.00% No2 0
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%0.00% No7 0
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%0.00% No3 0
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%0.00% No2 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Thomas Edison
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%50.00% No2 1
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%25.00% No4 1
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 31 706 0 19 Yes 0
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 56 676 0 12 Yes 0
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 19 1 1.60 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 1 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B White 0 1 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 28 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Thomas Edison
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%80.00% Yes20 165A 2011 65.0%96.67% Yes30 295A 2012 66.0%100.00% Yes56 56
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%0.00% Yes20 0
5B 2011 17.7%0.00% Yes30 0
5B 2012 17.5%0.00% Yes56 0
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.00% Yes020
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes030
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes056
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20114B White 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Thomas Edison
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.04 0 4 100.0% Yes
8 2011 86.02 1 3 66.7% No
8 2012 87.04 1 5 80.0% No
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2011
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes3 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Thomas Edison
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2012 100.0%
This indicator does not apply to this LEA.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2011 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2012 100.00.0 No1 0
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes13 0
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes13 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Woodbridge
Indicator 1 - Graduation Rates
Indicator 2 - Dropout Rates
Indicator 3 - Performance on AYP
Indicator School Year Graduation Rate Target Met Target?Graduates Dropouts
1 2010 84.081.5%22 5 No
1 2011 85.094.1%16 1 Yes
1 2012 87.077.4%24 7 No
Indicator School Year Dropout Rate Target Met Target?Enrollment DropOuts2 5.62010 4.1 Yes97 4
2 4.42011 0.0 Yes90 1
2 3.82012 7.7 No91 7
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2010 YesNoElem No
3A 2010 YesNoMiddle No
3A 2010 High Sch
3A 2011 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2011 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2011 High Sch
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Woodbridge
Indicator 3B - Participation in State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 3 Math 99.3%84.00% No2125
3B 2011 3 Math 99.4%95.00% No1920
3B 2012 3 Math 99.3%100.00% Yes1717
3B 2010 4 Math 99.0%58.33% No1424
3B 2011 4 Math 99.1%100.00% Yes2727
3B 2012 4 Math 99.0%100.00% Yes1717
3B 2010 5 Math 99.3%78.26% No1823
3B 2011 5 Math 99.4%100.00% Yes2929
3B 2012 5 Math 99.3%96.00% No2425
3B 2010 6 Math 98.5%53.57% No1528
3B 2011 6 Math 98.6%100.00% Yes2828
3B 2012 6 Math 98.5%100.00% Yes2929
3B 2010 7 Math 98.3%71.43% No1014
Indicator School Year Meets Reading Target? Meets Math Target?School Level Meets AYP Target?
3A 2012 YesYesElem Yes
3A 2012 YesYesMiddle Yes
3A 2012 High Sch
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
WoodbridgeIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2011 7 Math 98.4%93.33% No2830
3B 2012 7 Math 98.3%96.55% No2829
3B 2010 8 Math 97.4%55.56% No1018
3B 2011 8 Math 97.5%100.00% Yes1515
3B 2012 8 Math 97.4%100.00% Yes2828
3B 2010 10 Math 95.4%78.13% No2532
3B 2011 10 Math 95.5%100.00% Yes1919
3B 2012 10 Math 95.4%100.00% Yes2222
3B 2010 3 Reading 99.2%84.00% No2125
3B 2011 3 Reading 99.3%100.00% Yes2020
3B 2012 3 Reading 99.2%94.12% No1617
3B 2010 4 Reading 98.7%58.33% No1424
3B 2011 4 Reading 98.8%100.00% Yes2727
3B 2012 4 Reading 98.7%100.00% Yes1717
3B 2010 5 Reading 99.5%78.26% No1823
3B 2011 5 Reading 99.6%100.00% Yes3030
3B 2012 5 Reading 99.5%100.00% Yes2525
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Woodbridge
Indicator 3C - Performance on State Assessments
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Tested Target Met Target?# Tested# Eligible
3B 2010 6 Reading 98.4%51.85% No1427
3B 2011 6 Reading 98.5%96.43% No2728
3B 2012 6 Reading 98.4%100.00% Yes2929
3B 2010 7 Reading 98.2%71.43% No1014
3B 2011 7 Reading 98.3%96.55% No2829
3B 2012 7 Reading 98.2%96.55% No2829
3B 2010 8 Reading 97.6%55.56% No1018
3B 2011 8 Reading 97.7%100.00% Yes1616
3B 2012 8 Reading 97.6%100.00% Yes2828
3B 2010 10 Reading 95.8%78.13% No2532
3B 2011 10 Reading 95.9%100.00% Yes1919
3B 2012 10 Reading 95.8%100.00% Yes2222
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 3 Math 66.0%64.00% No25 16
3C 2011 3 Math 69.0%55.00% No20 11
3C 2012 3 Math 36.0%70.59% Yes17 12
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
WoodbridgeIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2010 4 Math 61.0%33.33% No24 8
3C 2011 4 Math 69.0%88.89% Yes27 24
3C 2012 4 Math 36.0%35.29% No17 6
3C 2010 5 Math 64.0%39.13% No23 9
3C 2011 5 Math 68.0%31.03% No29 9
3C 2012 5 Math 36.0%100.00% Yes24 24
3C 2010 6 Math 49.0%32.14% No28 9
3C 2011 6 Math 58.0%21.43% No28 6
3C 2012 6 Math 36.0%17.86% No28 5
3C 2010 7 Math 43.0%14.29% No14 2
3C 2011 7 Math 50.0%36.67% No30 11
3C 2012 7 Math 36.0%28.57% No28 8
3C 2010 8 Math 44.0%16.67% No18 3
3C 2011 8 Math 50.0%6.67% No15 1
3C 2012 8 Math 36.0%60.71% Yes28 17
3C 2010 10 Math 39.0%37.50% No32 12
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
WoodbridgeIndicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2011 10 Math 45.0%21.05% No19 4
3C 2012 10 Math 36.0%13.64% No22 3
3C 2010 3 Reading 77.0%60.00% No25 15
3C 2011 3 Reading 80.0%35.00% No20 7
3C 2012 3 Reading 35.6%56.25% Yes16 9
3C 2010 4 Reading 70.0%20.83% No24 5
3C 2011 4 Reading 80.0%40.74% No27 11
3C 2012 4 Reading 35.6%52.94% Yes17 9
3C 2010 5 Reading 75.0%26.09% No23 6
3C 2011 5 Reading 80.0%20.00% No30 6
3C 2012 5 Reading 35.6%76.00% Yes25 19
3C 2010 6 Reading 59.0%22.22% No27 6
3C 2011 6 Reading 69.0%28.57% No28 8
3C 2012 6 Reading 35.6%28.57% No28 8
3C 2010 7 Reading 59.0%21.43% No14 3
3C 2011 7 Reading 68.0%31.03% No29 9
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Woodbridge
Indicator 4A - Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days
Indicator 4B- Disproportionality in Students Suspended > 10 Days by Race/Ethnicity
Indicator School Year Grade Subject % Meets Target Met Target?# Tested # Meets
3C 2012 7 Reading 35.6%28.57% No28 8
3C 2010 8 Reading 59.0%11.11% No18 2
3C 2011 8 Reading 65.0%0.00% No16 0
3C 2012 8 Reading 35.6%64.29% Yes28 18
3C 2010 10 Reading 45.0%31.25% No32 10
3C 2011 10 Reading 50.0%26.32% No19 5
3C 2012 10 Reading 35.6%22.73% No22 5
Indicator FFY Met Target?
Spec Ed Enroll
Reg Ed Enroll
Spec Ed Suspend
RegEd Suspend
Rate Ratio
4A 280 1838 8 24 Yes 1.64
FFY 10 - Ratio over 1.32 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2010
4A 289 1937 1 20 Yes 0.34
FFY 11 - Ratio over 1.3 with cell size 15 or greater will trigger.
2011
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B Amer.Ind. 1 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Asian 2 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20104B Black 110 4 1.20 1.32 Yes
20104B Hispanic 32 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Woodbridge
Indicator 5A - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class < 21% of the Day
Indicator 5B - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Outside Regular Class >60% of the Day
Indicator 5C - LRE Ages 6 to 21 - Separate Settings
Indicator 6 - LRE Ages 3 to 5 - With Typical Peers (Early Childhood, Home, Part-time Early Childhood Part-Time Early Childhood Special Education)
Indicator School Year % Outside < 21% Target Met Target?Total # Outside < 21%5A 2010 62.0%58.70% No276 1625A 2011 65.0%52.86% No280 1485A 2012 66.0%55.71% No289 161
Indicator School Year % Outside > 60% Target Met Target?Total # Outside > 60%
5B 2010 18.2%27.54% No276 76
5B 2011 17.7%26.43% No280 74
5B 2012 17.5%20.07% No289 58
Indicator School Year % Separate Target Met Target?# Separate Total
5C 2010 3.8%0.36% Yes1276
5C 2011 3.6%0.00% Yes0280
5C 2012 3.6%0.00% Yes0289
Indicator School Year
% with Peers
Total EC # with Peers
6 2012 100.00%18 18 Data for FFY 2011 is baseline.
Indicator School Year Rate Ratio Target Met Target?
Race Special Ed Enrolled
Spec Ed Suspend>10
days
20104B White 173 0 0.00 1.32 Yes
20114B Afr.Amer. 111 6 4.14 1.3 Yes
20114B AI/AK 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Asian 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Hispanic 32 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Multi.Racial 1 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B Nat.Haw./PI 0 0 0.00 1.3 Yes
20114B White 134 2 1.14 1.3 Yes
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Woodbridge
Indicator 8 - Percent of parents with a child receiving Special Education services who report that schools facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
Indicator 9 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is the result of inappropriate identification. Disproportionate representation data are found in the APR.
Indicator 7 - Percent of pre-school children aged 3 though 5 who demonstrate improved Positive Social-Emotional Skills; Acquisition and use of Knowledge Skills; and use of Approppriate Behaviors to meet their needs.
Indicator School Year % Agree Target Met Target?Agree Disagree Total
8 2010 86.050 4 54 92.6% Yes
8 2011 86.035 5 40 87.5% Yes
8 2012 87.035 3 38 92.1% Yes
9 2010 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20117 100 91.9 Yes 67 64.9 Yes 7A - Social/Emotional
20117 100 91.9 Yes 0 64.9 No 7B - Knowledge
20117 100 91.9 Yes 67 64.9 Yes 7C - Behavior
Indicator School Year
% Within Age
Expectation
Target within Age
Met Age
Target?
% Increase Rate of Growth
Target Increase Rate of Growth
Met Growth Target?
Skillset
20127 100 90.6 Yes 92.3 60.4 Yes 7A - Social/Emotional
20127 100 93 Yes 69.2 54.5 Yes 7B - Knowledge
20127 100 91.9 Yes 84.6 65 Yes 7C - Behavior
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Woodbridge
Indicator 12 - Percent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who are found eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthdays.
Indicator 10 - Percent of LEA's with disproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is the result of inappropriate identification.
Indicator 11 - Percent of children with parental consent to evaluate, who were evaluated and eligibility determined within 45 school days or 90 calendar days, whichever is shorter.
Indicator School Year % Services by Age 3
Target Met Target?Referred Less Not Eligible and Parent
Refusals
# Services By Age 3
12 2010 100.0% 2
12 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes6 6
12 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes8 8
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2010
10 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator Disprop. Rep. is result of Inaprop. Identification Target Met TargetSchool Year:
2012
9 2011 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
9 2012 No 0.0% Yes
Indicator School Year Disprop representation is result of inappropriate identification
Target Met Target
Indicator School Year
% Within Target Met Target?W/In Timelines Not W/In Timelines
11 2010 100.0%100.0% Yes10 0
11 2011 100.0%100.0% Yes24 0
11 2012 100.0%100.0% Yes13 0
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011
Woodbridge
Indicator 13 - Percent of youth aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes coordinated, measureable, annual IEP goals and transition services that will reasonably enable the student to meet the post-secondary goals.
Indicator School Year
% Meeting Standard
Target Met Target?IEP's Reviewed
IEP's Meeting Standard
13 2010 100.0 0 0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
13 2011 100.091.0 No30 33
13 2012 100.0
Data was not reviewed for this reporting period.
District Progress on State Performance Plan Indicators for Students with Disabilities - FFY 2011