Diversity Data Resources from the Office of Academic Planning and Institutional Research...

Diversity Data Resources from the Office of Academic Planning

and Institutional Research

apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

What kinds of Student data do we measure?

• Enrollments• Retention• Graduation• Grades• Majors• High impact practices (study abroad, service

learning project, senior capstone course, etc.)• Comparisons with peer universities

What categories of students do we track?

• Gender• Race and ethnicity • First generation• Low income• Student level (graduate, undergraduate, first year, etc.)• Transfer student• International• Age • Program (PEOPLE, Posse, First-year Interest Group,

etc.)

• How many minority students attend UW-Madison?

• How has the number changed over time?

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

747576777879808182838485868788899091929394959697989900010203040506070809101112

RevisedRace/Ethnic Categories

Southeast Asian Collection BeginsRace/Ethnicity Collection Begins

Minority Students, 14.5%

Targeted Minority Students, 9.9%

From 2003 to 2012 4.4 percentage

point increase in Minority Enrollment

3.4 percentage point increase in Targeted Minority Enrollment

Indicator 1: Percent Enrollment of MinorityUndergraduate Students

Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). Minorities include targeted minorities as well as Other Asians and Native Hawaiians. International students are not counted for targeted minority collections.

http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm

2012 data is preliminary.

Indicator 2: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Undergraduate Students by Race/Ethnicity

Targeted Minorities include African American, Native American, Hispanic/Latino/a, Southeast Asian (Cambodians, Laotians, Vietnamese, and Hmong). International students are not counted within the targeted minority categories.


From 2003 to 2012: Increases in undergraduate

enrollment in all race/ethnic

categories 3.4 percentage

point increase in undergraduate

targeted minority enrollment

International Students: 6.8% of

Undergraduate Enrollment


2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

2.4% 2.4% 2.5% 2.7% 2.9% 2.9% 3.0% 2.8% 2.8% 2.7%

1.2% 1.4% 1.6% 1.7% 1.8% 1.8% 1.9% 1.9% 1.8% 1.8%0.5%0.6% 0.6% 0.6%

0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 1.0% 0.9%2.4%

2.6%2.8%

3.1%3.3% 3.6%

3.8% 3.9% 4.3% 4.4%

% o

f Tot

al U

nder

grad

uate

s

Hispanic/ Latino/a

Native American

SE Asian

African Ameri-can

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

2.1% 2.2% 2.1% 2.3% 2.5% 2.7% 2.7% 2.6% 2.7% 2.8%

0.5% 0.3% 0.5% 0.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.8% 0.9% 1.0% 1.0%0.5% 0.4% 0.5%

0.6% 0.7% 0.8% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%2.5% 2.5% 2.7%2.8% 2.9% 2.9%

3.2% 3.5% 3.7% 4.0%

% o

f Tot

al G

radu

ate

Stud

ent E

nrol

lmen

t

His-panic/ Latino/a

Native American

SE Asian

African American

Indicator 3: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Graduate Students, by Race/Ethnicity


From 2003 to 2012: Increases in

graduate student enrollment in all race/ethnic categories

3.2 percentage point increase in graduate targeted minority enrollment

International Students make up 25.6% of graduate enrollment



2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

3.6% 3.4% 3.9% 4.0% 4.4% 4.5% 4.1% 4.2% 4.2% 4.3%

0.3% 0.4%0.7% 0.9%

1.3% 1.6%1.6% 1.3% 1.2% 0.7%1.1% 1.0%

0.9%1.1%

1.2%1.3%

1.2% 1.0% 1.0% 1.0%

4.0% 4.1%3.5%

3.6%

3.7%3.7%

3.4%3.4% 3.3%

2.9%

% o

f Tot

al p

rofe

ssio

nal S

tude

nt E

nrol

lmen

t

Hispanic/ Latino/a

Native Ameri-canSE Asian

African Ameri-can

• From 2003 to 2012: Constant percent

of professional targeted minority enrollment

International Students make up 3.9% of professional student enrollment

Indicator 4: Percent Enrollment of Targeted Minority Professional Students, by Race/Ethnicity



2012 data is preliminary.Professional: DVM, MD, PharmD, Law, PA, MPH, DPT

• How do we compare to other universities?

Iowa State

Iowa State

Indiana

Wisconsin

Penn State

Pittsburgh

Michigan State

Minnesota

Michigan

Virginia

North Carolina

Florida

Washington

Texas

Rutgers

UC-Davis

UC-San Diego

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%

N = 2,228N = 1,917N = 2,328N = 4,102N = 4,365N = 3,360N = 4,137N = 3,050N = 5,870N = 6,559N = 2,904N = 4,371N = 6,109N = 3,456N = 6,110

N = 4,053N = 6,473N = 10,125N = 4,108N = 8,745N = 5,366

N = 10,197N = 11,891N = 9,963N = 11,040

N = 6,468N = 16,673N = 8,720N = 13,892

N = 14,089N = 14,160N = 15,024

N = 15,180N = 15,396

Percent of Undergraduates

Percent of Undergraduates who are Minorities at AAU Public Institutions, Fall 2010

Average Percent Minority for AAU Public Institutions: 29%

6 AAU Public Institutions have a lower percent of minority students than UW-Madison.

10 AAU Public Institutions have a smaller number of minority students than UW-Madison.

Peer Enrollments by Minority Status


Source: IPEDS Fall Enrollment, Fall 2010

80%

• What about some other measures of student diversity? –How many low income students and

first generation students are enrolled at UW?

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201202468

1012141618

12 12.510.7 11.4 11.7 11.1

14.116 16.5

13.7

Indicator 5: Percent Enrollment of Pell Grant Recipients (Undergraduates)



• 14.3% of all undergraduates are Pell Grant recipients.

• 13.7% of new students (new freshmen + new transfers) are Pell Grant recipients.

All Undergraduates

New Undergraduates

2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 201202468

1012141618

12.6 12.811.6 11.5 12.2 11.7

14.717.0 16.0

14.3

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

5

10

15

20

25

8.1

13.317.6

20.8 22.3 22.1 21.8 20.8 • Data on first-generation status is collected at the time of application.

• Question first asked in 2005.

• 18.9% of New Students (New Freshmen + New Transfers) are first-generation students.

Indicator 6: Percent Enrollment of First-Generation Students (Undergraduates)



All Undergraduates

New Undergraduates

Accumulating Data

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 20120

5

10

15

20

25

21.9 23.0 23.4 22.9 23.1 21.4 21.918.9

• What does the pipeline to UW-Madison look like?–How many low income students

are enrolled in high school in Wisconsin?

–How many students of color?

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%Percent of Group Total

Wisconsin's Low-Income Recruiting Pool

(90,991 of 264,206)

(14,504 of 64,687)

No Data Available on Low-Income Status of UW-Madison Applicants or Admits

(591 of 3,515)

Economically Disadvantaged High School Public School Students

Economically Disadvantaged Public High School Graduates

UW-Madison Enrolled

Pipeline: Low Income

“Economically Disadvantaged” represents those students who are eligible for free/reduced lunch.Sources: Wisconsin DPI WINSS, 2010-12 Enrollment by Student Group, Completions by Student GroupUW-Madison Data based on Fall 2012-13

• 34% of Public K-12 students in Wisconsin are Economically Disadvantaged (2011-12)

• 23% of Public High School Graduates are Economically Disadvantaged (2010)

• We have no reliable information on income of applicant students, all data based on financial aid applications

• 17% of Resident New Freshmen are Pell Grant Recipients


UW-Madison Enrolled

UW-Madison Admits

UW-Madison Applicants

"Well-Prepared" Minority Public High

School Graduates

Minority Public High School Graduates

Minority Public High School Students

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%Percent of Group Total

Wisconsin's Minority Recruiting Pool

(290,550 of 385,907)

(1,335 of 8441)

(729 of 5,740)

(483 of 3,515)

(753 of 14,943)

(11,568 of 64,687)

(56,519 of 264,206)

Pipeline: Minority

• 21% of Public High School students in Wisconsin are minority students(2011-12)

• 18% of Public High School Graduates are minority students (2009-10)

• 14% of Resident New Freshmen are minority students (2012)


“Well-prepared” high school graduates are in the top quartile of their graduating classes and score at least 22 (WI Average) on the ACT (or equivalent SAT score). The ACT is only one of many academic factors considered in the admissions process.

• How many students return for a second year?

• How many graduate within six years?

Retention and Graduation


1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 201070

80

90

100

Perc

ent R

etai

ned

1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 201040

50

60

70

80

90

100

Year of Cohort Entrance

Perc

ent G

radu

ated

Graduation Rates: (percent graduated within 6 years)

Retention Rates: (percent retained to the second year)

14 percentage pointGraduation Rate gap

2 percentage point First-YearRetention Rate gap

All Students: 94%

All Students: 83%

Targeted Minority Students: 69%

Targeted Minority Students: 92%

Summary of Retention and Graduation Rates by Student Group

Equity in Educational Outcomes

http://apir.wisc.edu/diversity.htm1-Year Retention Rate % Difference 6-Year Graduation

Rate % Difference

All New Freshmen 93.9 - 82.8 -Women 93.7 -.2 83.4 0.6

Men 94.1 0.2 81.9 -0.9Targeted Minority 91.7 -2.2 68.8 -14.0

Non-Targeted 94.2 0.3 84.1 1.3African American 92.9 -1.0 61.9 -20.9Native American 89.5 -4.4 68.6 -14.2

Hispanic/Latino/a 92.3 -1.6 74.9 -7.9South East Asian 89.9 -4.0 68.4 -14.4

Non-Targeted Asian 95.9 2.0 81.7 -1.1International 88.7 -5.2 70.5 -12.3

Wisconsin Residents 95.0 1.1 83.4 0.6Non-Residents 92.4 -1.5 80.7 -2.1

First-Generation College Students 93.1 -0.8 75.8 -7.0Freshmen Who Received Need-Based Aid 93.2 -0.7 76.4 -6.4

Freshmen Recipients of Pell Grants 91.7 -2.2 69.7 -13.1FIGs 95.0 1.1 79.1 -3.7

Targeted Minority in FIGs 93.8 -0.1 64.7 -18.1Note: 1-Year Retention Rate for 2010 Cohort, 6-Year Graduation Rate for 2005 Cohort

Ari

zona

Kans

asSU

NY-

Buffa

loN

ebra

ska

SUN

Y-St

ony

Broo

kCo

lora

doO

rego

nM

isso

uri

Iow

a St

ate

Purd

ueM

inne

sota

Iow

aIn

dian

aRu

tger

sO

hio

Stat

eW

eigh

ted

Ave

rage

Pitt

sbur

ghM

ichi

gan

Stat

eG

eorg

ia T

ech

UC

Sant

a Ba

rbar

aCa

se W

este

rnTe

xas

A&

MW

ashi

ngto

nTe

xas

UC

Dav

isM

aryl

and

Syra

cuse

UC

Irvi

neW

isco

nsin

Illin

ois

Flor

ida

Penn

Sta

teCa

ltec

hM

ichi

gan

UCL

AU

C Be

rkel

eyVa

nder

bilt

MIT

Colu

mbi

aCo

rnel

lVi

rgin

iaBr

own

Nor

thw

este

rn

-20.0

-15.0

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

Perc

enta

ge P

oint

Gap

Percentage Point Graduation Gap of Fall 2003-2005 Entrance Cohorts, Selected AAU Institutions

Selected Institutions, CSRDE data, sorted from lowest to highest overall graduation rates.

• Average graduation gap among AAU institutions is 1.2% (was 9.1% for 2002-2004 cohorts)

• Gap at UW-Madison is 10.5 percent, Compared to 17.1% for 2002-2004 cohorts.


What do we know about our employees?

• Employee counts over time• Recruitment• Retention and turnover• Promotions• Comparisons with peer universities

What groups of employees can we examine?

• Gender• Race and ethnicity• Age• International• Type of position (classified staff, academic

staff, faculty, teaching assistant, etc.)• Tenure status• Work unit

Women as a Percentage of Faculty and Staff

2012 data available in December 2012


• Women make up just under 50% of all employees at UW-Madison.

• A smaller proportion of faculty members are women (31%)

Total Faculty Exec/Dir/ Ad-

min

Instructional Acad. Staff

Other Acad. Staff Classified0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

Percent of Women Faculty and Staff by Employee Type

All Employee Groups

- Around 13% of all employees are minorities

- A larger proportion of faculty are minorities.


2012 data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010

Total Faculty Exec/Dir/

Admin

Instructional Acad. Staff

Other Acad. Staff

Classified0%2%4%6%8%

10%12%14%16%18%20%

Percent of Minority Faculty and Staff by Employee Type

Black, 2.2%

Asian, 10.9%

American Indian, 0.5%

Hispanic, 3.5%

Two or More Races, 0.6%

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Minority Faculty as a Percent of the Total Faculty Headcount

16.8%16.9%16.2%

13.2%13.8%

14.3% 14.6%15.1%

15.4%

17.6%

Indicator 12: Minority Faculty Representation

• In 2010: 2,177 total faculty members

• 17.6% (384) of Faculty are racial/ethnic minorities.

• 8% increase in minority faculty since 1996



Indicator 11: Minority Faculty Recruitment

• Increases in the percent of faculty hires that are racial/ethnic minorities.

2010-11 Data is preliminary.


82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 100

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

UW-Madison Faculty Hires by Minority Status

Minority Faculty Non-Asian Minority Faculty

Year of Hire

Perc

ent

Madison Plan

Strategic Hires SHI - 2

Instructional Academic Staff

• In 2010, 2,225 Instructional Academic Staff members

• 11.8% (263) of Instructional Academic Staff are racial/ethnic minorities

• 2.7% increase in minority instructional academic staff since 1996


2012data available in December 2012, New race/ethnic categories implemented in 2010

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Minority Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount

11.7%12.1%

11.2%11.9%11.5%

10.5%9.8%

8.8%8.9%

Black,1.5% (34)

Asian,7.1% (159)

American Indian,.2% (5)

Hispanic/Latino/a,2.6% (57)

11.8%

Two or More Races,.4% (8)

0

3

6

9

12

15

18

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Minority Non-Instructional Academic Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount

Hispanic/ Latino/a, 1.8% (90)

AmericanIndian, .5% (23)

Asian,8.0% (406)

Black,1.7% (85)

12%12%11.7%11.2%11.1%10.9%

10.2%9.6%9.4%

12.3%

Two or More Races,.5% (26)

Non-Instructional Academic Staff

• In 2010: 5,092 non-instructional Academic Staff

• 12.3% of non-instructional Academic Staff are minorities

• 3.7% increase in minority non-instructional academic staff since 1996



Classified Staff

• In 2010: 5,410 Classified Staff members

• 12.9% (697) of classified staff are minorities

• 8.7% increase in minority classified staff since 1996



0

3

6

9

12

15

18

2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

Minority Classified Staff as a Percent of the Total Headcount

12.6%12%11.8%11.3%

11%10%

9.1%8.5%8.1%

Hispanic/ Latino/a, 5.4% (291)American Indian,.3% (16)

Asian, 4.3% (233)

Black,2.4% (129)

12.9%

Two or More Races, 0.5% (28)

Indicator 13: Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Gender

• At 9 years, 67% of women faculty have been promoted to tenure.Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1992-93 to 2005-06


6 Years 9 Years0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

54%

72%

42%

67%

Percent Promoted to Tenure by Gender,within Six (6) and Nine (9) YearsMen Women

Indicator 14: Percent of Faculty Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status

• At 9 Years, 66% of minority faculty members have been promoted to tenure.


Percent tenured based on data for hires from 1992-93 to 2005-06

6 Years 9 Years0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

50%

71%

48%

66%

Percent Promoted to Tenure by Minority Status, within Six (6) and Nine (9) YearsNon-Minority Minority

72%

81% 79%74%

57%64% 66%

81%

72%

48%

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Total Physical Sciences Arts and Humanities

Biological Sciences Social Studies

Percent of Faculty Promoted within Nine (9) Years, by Gender and Division

Men Women

N=547

N=279

N=89N=144

N=29

N=93

N=190 N=74

N=124

N=83

Promotion to Tenure

• A lower percentage of women and men are promoted to tenure within the Social Studies.

• The largest gap in tenure rates by gender is within the Physical Sciences division.

Data on faculty hires from 1992-93 to 2004-05


• What kind of survey data do we have?– National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

includes many climate-related questions. Fielded in 2001, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2011

– Women in Science and Engineering Leadership Institute (WISELI) survey of faculty worklife in 2003, 2006, 2010, 2012

– UW System Climate survey of staff and students in CALS in 2011

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) 2011

Selected NSSE 2011 Results

** significantly different

Percent of Seniors who often or very much:


Tried to better understand someone else's views by imagining how it looks from their perspective

Included diverse perspectives in class discussion or assignments

Had serious conversations with student of a different race or ethnicity than your own

Understand people of other racial/ethnic backgrounds

75

63

71

55

66

56

49

56

67

57

52

56All

Non-Minority

Minority

**

**

See: http://apir.wisc.edu/students-surveys.htm

Date post:	02-Jan-2016
Category:	Documents
Upload:	jared-cox
View:	217 times
Download:	3 times

Diversity Data Resources from the Office of Academic Planning and Institutional Research...

Documents