+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Dividend Policy Business Law

Dividend Policy Business Law

Date post: 04-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: rohanjangid8
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 25

Transcript
  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    1/25

    Dividend Policy

    PRESENTED BY:MANMEET SINGH

    KAWALPREET KAUR

    AMANPREET KAUR

    EKTA VERMA

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    2/25

    WHAT IS DIVIDEND?

    The term dividend refers to that part of profits

    of a company which is distributed by the

    company among its shareholders.

    It is the reward of the shareholders for

    investments made by them in the shares of the

    company.

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    3/25

    DIVIDEND POLICY

    The dividend policy of a firm determines what

    proportion of earnings is paid to shareholders

    by way of dividends and what proportion is

    ploughed back in the firm for reinvestment

    purposes.

    The most controversial issue arises is what is

    the relationship between dividend policy andmarket price of equity shares.

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    4/25

    Models

    In which investment and dividend decision are

    related or theory of relevance.

    In which investment and dividend decisions

    are not related or theory of irrelevance.

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    5/25

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    6/25

    Theory of relevance

    Walter model

    Gordon model

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    7/25

    Walters approach

    James Walter has proposed the model.

    It is based on the relationship between the firms

    Return on investment i.e., r

    Cost of capital, i.e., k If r>k i.e., if the firm earns a higher rate of return on

    its investment than the required rate of return, thefirm should retain the earnings. Such firms aretermed as growth firms and their payout ratio iszero.

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    8/25

    Assumptions

    The firm is an all- equity financed entity.

    Further it will rely only on retained earnings

    to finance its future investments. This means

    that the investment decision is dependent on

    the dividend decision.

    The rate of return on investment is constant.

    The firm has an infinite life

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    9/25

    Implications

    R>k ,the price per share increases as thedividend payout ratio decreases. The optimumpayout ratio for a growth firm is nil.

    R = k, the price per share does not vary withchanges in dividend payout ratio. Theoptimum payout ratio for a normal firm isirrelevant.

    R < k, the price per share increases as thedividend payout ratio decreases. The optimumpayout ratio for a firm is 100% .

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    10/25

    Gordon model

    Myron Gordon proposed a model of stock

    valuation using the dividend capitalizationapproach.

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    11/25

    Assumptions

    Retained earnings represent the only source of

    financing for the firm.

    The rate of return on firm investment is

    constant.

    The growth rate of the firm is the product of its

    retention ratio and its rate of return.

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    12/25

    The firm has a perpetual life.

    Tax does not exist.

    The cost of capital for the firm remainsconstant and it is greater than the growth rate.

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    13/25

    Implications

    R>k ,the price per share increases as thedividend payout ratio decreases. The optimumpayout ratio for a growth firm is nil.

    R = k, the price per share does not vary withchanges in dividend payout ratio. Theoptimum payout ratio for a normal firm isirrelevant.

    R < k, the price per share increases as thedividend payout ratio decreases. The optimumpayout ratio for a firm is 100% .

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    14/25

    TRADITIONAL THEORY

    It is given by Graham and Dodd. Acc to this

    approach in the valuation of shares the weight

    attached to its dividend is equal to four times

    the weight attached to retained earnings.

    The major contention of the traditional

    position is that a liberal payout policy has a

    favorable impact on stock price

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    15/25

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    16/25

    Criticism

    The equation a) is misspecified because it

    omits risk which is an important determinant

    of price.

    The omission of risk imparts an upward bias to

    b, the coefficient of dividend and downward

    bias to c, the coefficient of retained earnings.

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    17/25

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    18/25

    Residual approach

    This theory assumes that investors do notdifferentiate between dividends and retentions by

    the firm. Their basic desire is to earn higher return on their

    investment.

    In case the firm has profitable investmentopportunities giving a higher rate of return thanthe cost of retained earnings, the investors wouldbe content with the firm retaining the earnings to

    finance the same.

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    19/25

    However, if the firm is not in a position to findprofitable investment opportunities, the

    investors would prefer to receive the earnings

    in the form of dividends. Thus, a firm should retain the earnings if it has

    profitable investment opportunities, otherwise

    it should pay them as dividends.

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    20/25

    MILLER AND MODIGLIANI

    MODEL

    Dividend policy has no effect on the market

    price of the shares and the value of the firm is

    determined by the earning capacity of the firmor its investment policy.

    The splitting of earnings between retentions

    and dividends, may be in any manner the firmlikes, does not effect the value of the firm.

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    21/25

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    22/25

    Assumptions

    Investment opportunities and future profits of

    the firm are known with certainty.

    There are no taxes.

    Floatation costs are nil.

    Investment and financing decisions are

    independent. Information is freely available to everyone

    equally.

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    23/25

    Criticism

    Regarding issue cost or floatation cost.

    Regarding tax position.

    Informational content.

    Uncertainty and fluctuations.

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    24/25

    IMPLICATIONS

    MM dividend irrelevance theorem.

    Exist on their leverage irrelevance theorem.

    There is no conflict between dividend

    capitalization approach.

  • 8/13/2019 Dividend Policy Business Law

    25/25

    THANKYOU


Recommended