Date post: | 17-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | chloe-hunter |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
DD
DDØØ Forward Proton Detector Forward Proton Detector
Andrew BrandtAndrew BrandtUTAUTA
Q4D SQ3S
A1A2
P1UP
p p
Z(m)
D1
Detector
Bel
low
s
Roman Pot
233359 3323057
P2OUT
Q2
P1DN P2IND2Q4 Q3 Q2
June 23, 2002Atlas Collab. MeetingClermont-Ferrand
DDDiffraction Thesis Topics
Soft Diffraction and Elastic Scattering: Inclusive Single Diffraction
Elastic scattering (t dependence)
Total Cross Section
Centauro Search
Inclusive double pomeron
Search for glueballs/exotics
Hard Diffraction: Diffractive jet
Diffractive b,c
Diffractive W/Z
Diffractive photon
Diffractive top
Diffractive Higgs
Other hard diffractive topics
Double Pomeron + jets
Other Hard Double Pomeron topics
Rapidity Gaps: Central gaps+jets
Gap tags vs. proton tags
Double pomeron with gaps
E
<100 events in Run I, >1000tagged events in Run II
DDData Taking
• No special conditions required • Read out Roman Pot detectors for all events (can’t miss ) • A few dedicated global triggers for diffractive jets, double pomeron, and elastic events• Use fiber tracker trigger board -- select , |t| ranges at L1, readout DØ standard• Reject fakes from multiple interactions (Ex. SD + dijet) using L0 timing, silicon tracker, longitudinal momentum conservation, and scintillation timing• Obtain large samples (for 1 fb-1):
~ 1K diffractive W bosons ~ 3K hard double pomeron ~500K diffractive dijets
ttppp
with minimal impact on standard DØ physics program
DDAcceptanceQuadrupole ( p or )p
Dipole ( only)p
Dipole acceptance better at low |t|, large Cross section dominated by low |t| ||6/ tedtd
0 0.02 0.04 1.4 1.4 1.3 2 35 95
(%)AQuadrupole Dipole
MX (G
eV)
450
400
350
280
200
GeV2
GeV2
450
400
350
280
200
MX (G
eV)
Geo
met
ric
A
ccep
tan
ce
DD
• Constructed from 316L Stainless Steel• Parts are degreased and vacuum degassed• Plan to achieve 10-11 Torr• Use Fermilab style controls• Bakeout castle, then insert fiber detectors
Roman Pot Castle Design
Detector
50 l/s ion pump
Beam
Worm gear assembly
Step motor
DD
Thin windowand flangeassembly
Bellows
Detector is inserted into cylinder until it reaches thin window
Motor
Flangeconnectingto vacuum vessel
ThreadedCylinder
Roman Pot Arm Assembly
DDBypass
Sep SepSep
Sep Girder
TunnelFloor
Pit Floor
Bypass
Sep SepSep PotPot
Sep Girder
Pit FloorHole inFloor
Run II Girder Configuration
Run I Girder Configuration
Girder Reconfiguration
BEFORE:
AFTER:
p
p
DD
All 6 castles with 18 Roman pots comprising the FPD were constructed in Brazil, installed in the Tevatron in fall of 2000, and have been functioning as designed.
Quadrupole castle A2 installed in the beam line.
Castle StatusCastle Status
DD
4 fiber bundlefits well thepixel size ofH6568 16 Ch.MAPMT (Multi-Anode Photomultiplier Tube)7 PMT’s/detector16 250 m fibers each PMT
Six planes(u,u’,x,x’,v,v’)of 800 m scintillatingfibers (’) planesoffset by 2/3fiber
20 channels/plane(U,V)(’)16 channels/plane(X,X’)112 channels/detector18 detectors2016 total channels4 fibers/channel8064 fibers1 250 m LMB
fiber/channel8 LMB fibers / bundle252 LMB bundles80 m theoretical
resolution
Detector SetupDetector Setup
DD
At the University of Texas, Arlington (UTA), scintillating and optical fibers were spliced and inserted into the detector frames.
Detector AssemblyDetector Assembly
DD
The plastic frames containing the clear fibers are attached to the cartridge bottom.
Detectors in CartridgesDetectors in Cartridges
The cartridge bottom containing the detector is installed in the Roman pot and then the cartridge top with PMT’sis attached.
DD • All 18 cartridges have been assembled, 10 are installed in tunnel (8 with full detectors 2 with trigger scint). The 10 instrumented pots (Phase I) are ups, downs, and dipoles.
• Cables and tunnel electronics (low voltage, amp/shapers, etc.) installed and operational for full 18 pot (Phase II) setup.
• 9 more detectors are complete except for final polishing, last 3 (2 spares) will be finished this summer.
Tunnel and Detector StatusTunnel and Detector Status
DDIn the October 2001 shutdown four veto counters (designed at UTA, built at Fermilab) each of which cover 5.2 < || < 5.9 were installed between DØ and the first low beta quadrupole (Q4), about 6 m from the interaction point.
The counters, two each on the outgoing proton and anti-proton arms, can be used in Diffractive triggering (veto proton remnant).
Veto CountersVeto Counters
DDPot MotionPot Motion
Pot motion is controlled by an FPD shifter in the DØ Control Room via a Python program that uses the DØ online system to send commands to the step motors in the tunnel.
DDStand-alone DAQStand-alone DAQ
•Due to delays in DØ trigger electronics, we have maintained our stand-alone DAQ first used in the fall 2000 engineering run.
•We build the trigger with NIM logic using signals given by our trigger PMT’s, veto counters, DØ clock, and the luminosity monitor.
•If the event satisfies the trigger requirements, the CAMAC module will process the signal given by the MAPMT’s.
•With this configuration we can read the fiber information of only two detectors (currently PD spectrometer is read out), although all the trigger scintillators are available for triggering.
•An elastic trigger is formed from coincidences ofthe PU+AD spectrometers combined with halo vetoes (early time hits) and vetoes on LM and Veto counters.
DDFPD Control Room FPD Control Room
DDElastic Distribution (raw)
=p/p should peak at 0 for elastic events!!
Require clean events with 0 or 1 hit per plane for initial studies
DDData Elastic x,y Correlations
PD1x vs. PD2x (mm)
PD1y vs. PD2y (mm)
Good correlation between x1,x2 and y1,y2 in data but shifted from MC expectation (3 mm in x and 1 mm in y)
DDElastic ,t (calibrated)
Minimum t about 1.0 Gev2
peak reasonably Gaussian, still 2x ideal MC resolution
Calibrated now peaks at 0
DDProton IDProton ID
The Proton ID group led by Gilvan Alves and Sergio Novaes has made substantial progress in many software areas:
•Track reconstruction
•Monte Carlo
•Unpacking
•Single Interaction Tool
•Alignment
•Database
Regular Proton-ID meetings are held off-week Thursdays 11-12:30 in Black Hole using VRVS
DDGoals for 2002Goals for 2002
•Early summer •Installation of full readout chain for one spectrometer
•Late summer/fall•Installation of readout chain for Phase I 10 detectors = 5 spectrometers•FPD data acquisition integrated into DØ•Elastic + Diffractive dN/dt and -distribution
•September•FPD triggers in DØ global list
•December•First Diffractive + jets data analysis shown at QCD meeting
DDLessons LearnedLessons Learned
•Bigger project than you (I) might think: more manpower, time, cost, CABLES
•Using other people’s electronics is risky
•Need a budget and some level of priority (beyond the baseline syndrome)
•Early integration is essential
•Good contacts in the Accelerator Division are crucial
•Halo not well-understood
•Elastics or alignment, redundancy needed
•Splicing fibers is painful
DDFPD Summary• FPD will be a completely integrated sub-detector of the DØ detector which will help maximize Run II physics potential
• Hard diffraction exists, but not well-understood -- large data samples and precise measurements needed
• Large and L at Tevatron necessary for these measurements
• Combination of quadrupole and dipole spectrometers gives ability to tag both p’s and p ’s over large kinematic range, allows alignment, understanding of backgrounds
• Tremendous progress in installation and commissioning, emphasis switches to trigger, software, operations, and data analysis
• Starting to think about physics a little!
s
DD•Used finite element analysis to model different window options
•Built three types of pots and studied deflection with pressurized helium.
•150 micron foil with elliptical cutout gives excellent results
NIKHEF Window
DDMeasurements Using the FPD
• Observation of hard diffractive processes.• Measure cross sections
jetspp
jetsSD
allSD
jetsSD
dtdM
jetsSDd
2
2
02.0GeV280for%30012.0
01.0GeV200for%62/
M
MM
x
x
||12.0 tt dominated by angular dispersion 15% error for (resolutions given for dipole spectrometer).
• Measure kinematical variables with sensitivity to pomeron structure ( , ET, …) Use Monte Carlo to compare to different pomeron structures and derive pomeron structure.
• Combine different processes to extract quark and gluon content.
2GeV5.0|t|
DD
allSD
jetsSD
(Arbitrary Scale)
0.050
GeV15E t
0.050
GeV15E t
Dip
ole
Reg
ion
Qua
drup
ole
Reg
ion
FPD Measurements (1 fb-1)
DD
Et > 15 GeV10,000 events
Soft(1-x)5
Hardx(1-x)
jetspp
jetsSD
Et > 15 GeV0<|t|<3 GeV2
Hard gg
Hard qq
FPD Measurements (1 fb-1)
DDPot Motion SafeguardsPot Motion Safeguards
• The software is reliable and has been tested extensively. It has many safeguards to protect against accidental insertion of the pots into the beam.
• The drivers are disabled with a switch in the Control Room when the pots are not being moved.
• The pots are hooked to an emergency line which bypasses the software to send the pots back to the home position in case of emergency (tested but not used).
DDPot Insertion MonitorPot Insertion Monitor
Effect of the pot motion on the proton and antiproton losses at DØ and CDF is monitored using ACNET.
Current agreement with Beams Division and CDFrequires that the effect on halo rates is less than 20%.