Date post: | 19-May-2015 |
Category: |
Education |
Upload: | eric-schnell |
View: | 556 times |
Download: | 3 times |
docMD:docMD:
Eric H. Schnell ([email protected])Eric H. Schnell ([email protected])
Associate ProfessorAssociate Professor
Head, Information Technology Head, Information Technology
Prior Health Sciences LibraryPrior Health Sciences Library
The Ohio State UniversityThe Ohio State University
(DOCument Mediated Delivery)
docMD is funded through support by the National Network of Libraries of Medicine, Greater Midwest Region. Ohio State University project number 743202
docMD GoaldocMD Goal
“ “ To establish an electronic To establish an electronic document delivery service for document delivery service for hospital libraries that are unable to hospital libraries that are unable to support such a service themselves support such a service themselves due to limited human, financial, or due to limited human, financial, or technical resources “ technical resources “
docMD ObjectivesdocMD Objectives
Establish a mediated direct-to-Establish a mediated direct-to-customer document delivery service customer document delivery service for hospital libraries for hospital libraries
Identify the costs involved in Identify the costs involved in providing such a service providing such a service
Develop a model for use by other Develop a model for use by other resource libraries in other regions of resource libraries in other regions of the country the country
Why docMD?Why docMD?
IDD Reduces telecom costs IDD Reduces telecom costs (Landes ’97)(Landes ’97)
IDD Reduces turnaround timeIDD Reduces turnaround time1986: 13.76 days (Budd)1986: 13.76 days (Budd)
1999: reduced to 2.52 (Sellen)1999: reduced to 2.52 (Sellen)
Web delivery reduces supply costsWeb delivery reduces supply costs(Weible ’02)(Weible ’02)
Barriers to Hospital Barriers to Hospital Library IDD Library IDD ImplementationImplementation
Firewalls (McKnight 2001)Firewalls (McKnight 2001) communication portscommunication ports
network authoritynetwork authority
Workflow / staffing (Jackson 1993) Workflow / staffing (Jackson 1993)
Access to technical staffAccess to technical staff
Fiscal resourcesFiscal resources
How docMD Jumps these How docMD Jumps these BarriersBarriers
Firewalls Firewalls a common communication port is used (80)a common communication port is used (80)
Workflow / staffingWorkflow / staffing DOCLINE processing remains the sameDOCLINE processing remains the same Less physical processing of documentsLess physical processing of documents
Access to technical staffAccess to technical staff Essential technical staff at mediation centerEssential technical staff at mediation center Little technical site support neededLittle technical site support needed
Fiscal resourcesFiscal resources GMR supportedGMR supported
Participating Libraries Participating Libraries Must:Must:
Be a DOCLINEBe a DOCLINE®® library libraryIdentify the populations this project could Identify the populations this project could
potentially reach potentially reach Provide a letter of interest Provide a letter of interest Be willing to assist their users with local Be willing to assist their users with local
issues issues Implement and market the service locally Implement and market the service locally Provide the project with feedback and Provide the project with feedback and
participate in the evaluation process participate in the evaluation process Be willing to "go with the flow" Be willing to "go with the flow"
docMD Delivery ModeldocMD Delivery Model
Local Library
Customer
DOCLINE
Lending “A” Lending “B”
Scans/Sends though IDD Scans/Sends though IDD
docMD
Web Server
Email with docID#
Email Alert
TimelineTimeline
Approval July ‘02 Approval July ‘02
Planning Fall ‘02Planning Fall ‘02
11stst test document December ‘02 test document December ‘02
6 phase one sites online February 6 phase one sites online February ’03’03
12 phase two sites June ’0312 phase two sites June ’03
Through December ’04Through December ’04
Survey ToolsSurvey Tools
Project Librarian SurveyProject Librarian Survey
Technical Survey (Lib / Cust)Technical Survey (Lib / Cust)
Attitudes Survey (Cust)Attitudes Survey (Cust)
Turnaround Time StudyTurnaround Time Study
docMD StatisticsdocMD Statistics (as of Sept 2, (as of Sept 2,
‘04)‘04)
406 registered customers406 registered customers 3111 documents processed3111 documents processed ~15% have gone unviewed~15% have gone unviewed >40% sent to the librarian >40% sent to the librarian <1% required reposting<1% required reposting <1% alternative distribution<1% alternative distribution <1% posting failures<1% posting failures
docMD StatisticsdocMD Statistics
Average document processing time: Average document processing time: 1 minute 1 minute
Average number of documents requiring Average number of documents requiring follow up: 1 per week follow up: 1 per week
Percentage of documents arriving upside Percentage of documents arriving upside down: 20% -> 1%down: 20% -> 1%
Number of customers contacting docMD Number of customers contacting docMD central regarding difficulty in central regarding difficulty in
downloading downloading a document: 1a document: 1
Turnaround TimeTurnaround Time
Pre – docMD: 6.53 days (max 19 Pre – docMD: 6.53 days (max 19 days)days)
Post – docMD: 3.11 days (max 9) Post – docMD: 3.11 days (max 9)
FeedbackFeedback
“ “Our docs are always so delighted when Our docs are always so delighted when personalized mail arrives for them.” personalized mail arrives for them.” one has a “raft of administrators tooling one has a “raft of administrators tooling past his office wanting to know how his past his office wanting to know how his articles were retrieved electronically. articles were retrieved electronically. They believe that he magically pulled They believe that he magically pulled them up all by himself. “them up all by himself. “
“ “another test subject… has been running another test subject… has been running around Nursing telling people…” around Nursing telling people…”
Issues:Issues:
Geography: Project leaders / librarian Geography: Project leaders / librarian face-to-face contact difficult face-to-face contact difficult
Geography II: Difficult if not Geography II: Difficult if not impossible impossible to organize group to organize group trainingtraining
Geography III: Email helps. Phone is Geography III: Email helps. Phone is more effective but more time more effective but more time consuming consuming
Issues:Issues:
How docMD is implemented at a site How docMD is implemented at a site is is dependent on the hospital dependent on the hospital librarianlibrarian
Level of participation is dependent on Level of participation is dependent on the marketing performed by the the marketing performed by the hospital librarianshospital librarians
Too much hand-holding or separation Too much hand-holding or separation anxiety?anxiety?
Issues: FundingIssues: Funding
Pay-to-Play (1)Pay-to-Play (1)Each hospital pays a fee based on scale determined by the Each hospital pays a fee based on scale determined by the
number of documents they normally process through number of documents they normally process through DOCLINE in relation to other participants in a tiered fee DOCLINE in relation to other participants in a tiered fee schedule. schedule.
Pay-to-Play (2) Pay-to-Play (2) Each hospital pays a per-document fee based on the actual Each hospital pays a per-document fee based on the actual
number of documents they process using docMD and is billed number of documents they process using docMD and is billed on a quarterly or annual or per-document basis. on a quarterly or annual or per-document basis.
Subsidized (1)Subsidized (1)Each NNLM region establishes funding opportunities for resource Each NNLM region establishes funding opportunities for resource
libraries to support a docMD service for their resource area. libraries to support a docMD service for their resource area. Resource libraries apply for the available awards. Resource libraries apply for the available awards.
Subsidized (2)Subsidized (2)Each NNLM region provides a funded mandate to each resource Each NNLM region provides a funded mandate to each resource
library to establish a docMD service in their area. library to establish a docMD service in their area. Benevolent Benevolent
Any library can provide the service but supports it using their Any library can provide the service but supports it using their individual operating funds and can pursue reimbursement individual operating funds and can pursue reimbursement from the participants.from the participants.
Issues: StandardsIssues: Standards
GEDI: Generic Electronic Document GEDI: Generic Electronic Document InterchangeInterchange
Established in early 1990sEstablished in early 1990s
Ariel 1.x - 3.4Ariel 1.x - 3.4
OdysseyOdysseyOpen StandardOpen Standard
Ariel 4.xAriel 4.x
????????
proprietaryproprietary
Issues: StandardsIssues: Standards
Question: Is Ariel 3.4 compatible with all other versions of Question: Is Ariel 3.4 compatible with all other versions of Ariel?Ariel? Answer:Answer: Yes. Ariel 3.4 is able to send and receive documents with Ariel versions Yes. Ariel 3.4 is able to send and receive documents with Ariel versions 2 and 3. 2 and 3.
However, Infotrieve has in important announcement about Ariel: However, Infotrieve has in important announcement about Ariel: Infotrieve continues to improve and upgrade Ariel, which will greatly Infotrieve continues to improve and upgrade Ariel, which will greatly change Ariel’s technology (especially with an eye to building a change Ariel’s technology (especially with an eye to building a networked version of Ariel 4.0). We foresee that future versions of Ariel networked version of Ariel 4.0). We foresee that future versions of Ariel will no longer be technically compatible with older versions. We will no longer be technically compatible with older versions. We anticipate that Ariel 3.4 will be the “cut off” version for future anticipate that Ariel 3.4 will be the “cut off” version for future compatibility. Hence, we encourage all 3.x users to upgrade to 3.4 for compatibility. Hence, we encourage all 3.x users to upgrade to 3.4 for free, to be prepared for this future change. We also encourage Ariel 2.x free, to be prepared for this future change. We also encourage Ariel 2.x users to take advantage of our upgrade discount and get current to users to take advantage of our upgrade discount and get current to prevent incompatibilty with future releases of Ariel. Infotrieve will prevent incompatibilty with future releases of Ariel. Infotrieve will continue to communicate about this important issue so that our continue to communicate about this important issue so that our customers can plan and budget accordingly. When we release the next customers can plan and budget accordingly. When we release the next version of Ariel, we will provide Ariel 3.4 users with a patch that will version of Ariel, we will provide Ariel 3.4 users with a patch that will ensure compatibility with the next version, Ariel 4.0. It is important to ensure compatibility with the next version, Ariel 4.0. It is important to take advantage of this release now. take advantage of this release now. http://www4.infotrieve.com/ariel/FAQ.htmlhttp://www4.infotrieve.com/ariel/FAQ.html
Issues: StandardsIssues: Standards
Lack of IDD standards will result in Lack of IDD standards will result in the project ending in December the project ending in December 20042004
Lack of IDD standards will prevent a Lack of IDD standards will prevent a wide scale implementation of the wide scale implementation of the conceptconcept
Expanding the Concept:Expanding the Concept:OhioDOC OhioDOC
Establish a direct-to-customer Establish a direct-to-customer electronic electronic document delivery document delivery service for all service for all OhioLINK libraries. OhioLINK libraries. Establish a system for centralized Establish a system for centralized electronic electronic document delivery document delivery distribution distribution Establish electronic document delivery Establish electronic document delivery
services in libraries without themservices in libraries without them Create workflow efficiencies Create workflow efficiencies
Current Direct to Customer Current Direct to Customer Processing ModelProcessing Model
Local Library
Customer
OCLC / DOCLINE
Ohio Lending “A” Ohio Lending “B”
Scans/Sends though IDD Scans/Sends though IDD
EDD
Web Server
OhioDOC ModelOhioDOC Model
Local Library
Customer
OCLC / Docline
Ohio Lending “A” Ohio Lending “B”
Scans/Sends though EDD Scans/Sends though EDD
OhioDOC
OhioDoc Model ExpandedOhioDoc Model Expanded
Local Library
OCLC / Docline
Ohio Lending “A”
Customer
EDD
Web Server
Ohio Lending “C”
Ohio Lending “B”
Ohio Lending “D”
Ohio Lending “E”
Current Direct to Customer Current Direct to Customer Processing ModelProcessing Model
Ohio “A” Ohio “B” Ohio “C”
Process Process Process
Web Web Web
OhioDOC Processing ModelOhioDOC Processing Model
Ohio “A” Ohio “B” Ohio “C”
Process Process Process
Web Web Web
Web
OhioDOC ExpectationsOhioDOC Expectations
Lending libraries still scan and Lending libraries still scan and process documents intended for process documents intended for OhioLINK librariesOhioLINK libraries
Borrowing libraries would no longer Borrowing libraries would no longer receive and process documents receive and process documents coming from OhioLINK lending coming from OhioLINK lending libraries libraries
Thanks! Thanks!
E-mail:E-mail: [email protected]@osu.edu
Project:Project: docmd.med.ohio-docmd.med.ohio-
state.edustate.edu