DOCTOR, NGO WORKER, OR SOMETHING ELSE ENTIRELY?
WHICH CAREERS DO THE MOST GOOD?
Will CrouchFaculty of PhilosophyUniversity of [email protected]
INTRODUCTION Giving What We Can is a society whose members
pledge to give at least 10% (and in some cases over 50%) of their income to the most cost-effective causes.
Drawing on the latest economic research, we’ve found that one can save a life for £300.
By giving 50% of my academic salary, I’ll save 3000 lives.
But could I do more if I pursued a different career?
OVERVIEW OF THIS TALK Part I: How to Think about Careers
Normally, we think that the most ethical career is one in the third sector, directly benefiting people.
I’ll suggest that’s wrong, based on mistakes regarding: indirect benefit; marginal benefit; quantification; and martyrdom.
Part II: High Impact Careers: Which is Best? We look at money-making careers, research
careers and ‘influencing’ careers. I’ll point to the key questions to ask when
deciding between them.
PART I
HOW TO THINK ABOUT CAREERS
CATEGORISING CAREER PATHS
Direct Benefiter
Doctor
NGO Worker
State school teacher
Money-Maker
Banker
Corporate Lawyer
Management
Consultant
Researcher
Medical
Development
economics
Ethics
Influencer
Campaigner
Teacher
Politician
THE STANDARD VIEW
According to the Standard View, the paradigm examples of ethical careers are the ‘direct benefiters’.
But consider the following story...
THE STORY OF THE DOCTOR AND THE ALTRUISTIC BANKER Suppose that Jo becomes a doctor working in
the developing world. She performs 10 life-saving surgeries every week:
THE STORY OF THE DOCTOR AND THE ALTRUISTIC BANKER
Suppose that Lorna becomes an altruistic banker, earns £400k/yr, and donates enough money that she pays for 10 developing-world doctors:
THE STORY OF THE DOCTOR AND THE ALTRUISTIC BANKER
That means100 lives per week would be saved:
THE STORY OF THE DOCTOR AND THE ALTRUISTIC BANKER
DOCTORS, BANKERS, AND OPPORTUNITY COST: THE MORAL
The banker was able to save ten times as many lives as the doctor, even though she wasn’t directly saving any lives in her career.
DOCTORS, BANKERS, AND OPPORTUNITY COST: THE MORAL
The Moral: Ways of indirectly benefiting others, such as earning big and donating, can do much more good than directly benefiting.
MARGINAL BENEFIT The previous story underestimated the
discrepancy between the banker and the doctor.
This is because: had Jo not become that doctor, someone else would have.
MARGINAL BENEFIT
In contrast, if Lorna had not earned and donated the money, the result would have been fewer doctors.
If she hadn’t become an altruistic banker, all 100 people would have died.
MARGINAL BENEFIT: THE MORAL
The Moral: Do something that wouldn’t have happened anyway.
‘MAKING A DIFFERENCE’: THE FAILURE TO QUANTIFY
Where did we go wrong?
Perhaps we focused on making a difference rather than making the most difference.
Thinking with our gut overlooks the vast discrepancy among different career routes.
‘MAKING A DIFFERENCE’: THE FAILURE TO QUANTIFY
‘MAKING A DIFFERENCE’: THE FAILURE TO QUANTIFY
The Moral: Going with your gut, or relying on heuristics like ‘do what you’re good at’ isn’t enough. Choosing the right career requires research and reflection, and the willingness to take new ideas seriously.
‘MAKING A DIFFERENCE’: MARTYRDOM
Perhaps we assume that doing good must involve self-sacrifice.
But if the altruistic banker earns £6mn over a 30yr career, she could save 10 thousand lives and still have an average salary of £100 000/yr.
‘MAKING A DIFFERENCE’: MARTYRDOM
The Moral: By choosing the right career, you can have a high-flying lifestyle and benefit others far more than you would otherwise have done.
CAUSING HARM?
The most obvious objection to our suggestion is: what if the career you pursue causes harm?
Surely that’s the reason why we shouldn’t go into banking.
CAUSING HARM?
There’s some truth in this objection, but also some considerations need to be born in mind:
Causing harm is an inevitable part of many careers, including working as a doctor or for an NGO.
Not all high-impact careers cause harm. For example:
Actuary Private Medicine Engineering
CAUSING HARM? And we need to think about what would have
happened if you hadn’t gone into the career.
Suppose that the typical manager in a munitions factory causes 10 deaths, by enabling more soldiers to fight in unjust wars:
CAUSING HARM? Now suppose that you pursue this career
path, for the high pay.
You, being altruistically minded, will almost certainly cause fewer deaths than the typical manager of this factory:
CAUSING HARM?
Far from harming people, the world is benefited in virtue of you working for a munitions factory. This is a benefit independent of the good that your donations do.
CAUSING HARM?
This example isn’t just hypothetical…
The previous story described Oskar Schindler, who ran Nazimunitions factories and used his earnings to pay for 1200 Jewish lives.
CAUSING HARM?
The Moral: High-impact careers needn’t also involve harming people.
SUMMARY: THE MORALS – PART I
•Earning big and donating can do more than directly benefiting.
Benefit Indirectly
•Do something that wouldn’t have happened anyway. Don’t be
Replaceable•Your gut isn’t good enough.Quantify
•You can have a both a high-flying lifestyle and a massive impact.
No Need to Sacrifice
•High-impact careers needn’t also harm the world.
Understand Harm
PART II
HIGH IMPACT CAREERS: WHICH IS
BEST?
HIGH IMPACT CAREERS: WHICH IS BEST?
Bearing in mind the morals of part 1...
And bearing in mind that you can save a life for £300...
Which career does the most good?
CATEGORISING CAREER PATHS
Direct Benefiter
Doctor
NGO Worker
State school teacher
Money-Maker
Banker
Corporate Lawyer
Management
Consultant
Researcher
Medical
Development
economics
Ethics
Influencer
Campaigner
Teacher
Politician
For most people, probably not
MONEY-MAKING
By pursuing certain careers, one can make a lot of money….
MONEY-MAKINGFound a BusinessOwn a Hedge Fund
Estimates of average lifetime salary, salaries from prospects.ac.uk or contacts, my estimates of career progression
£21,500 £48,000 £70,000
£230,000
£1,500,000
£740,000
£1,250,000
£700,000
£120,000
£720,000
£210,000£90,000
£50,000£45,000
Median
Sala
ry
Private
Sch
ool T
each
er
Tutoria
l Fell
ow
1st Y
ear in
Ban
king
High-p
aid ac
adem
ic GP
Low pa
id ba
rrister
Assoc
iate C
onsu
ltant
Inves
tmen
t Ana
lyst
Magic
Circle
Solicit
or
High-p
aid B
arrist
er
Prop Trad
er
Bankin
g Dep
t Hea
d
Compa
ny C
EO
HOW MUCH COULD YOU MAKE?
Some career paths offer a small chance of making lots and lots of money. e.g. founding a business
– billions? 25mn lives?
HOW MUCH COULD YOU MAKE?
Other career paths offer a good salary with high confidence. e.g. GPs can earn ~£3.6m, 2.25x the academic.
Others offer good salaries with high certainty and small chances of very high income. e.g. the starting salary in finance/consulting
(£40-50k) is roughly equal the lifetime average of an academic or teacher. And there’s a tail…
BANKING: OVER A 30 YEAR CAREER
$0
$500,000
$1,000,000
$1,500,000
$2,000,000
$2,500,000
$3,000,000
$3,500,000
$4,000,000
Source: http://www.careers-in-finance.com/ibsal.htm
HOW MUCH COULD YOU MAKE? If you level-out low in the ranks of:
management consultants; investment analysts; investment bankers; traders; barristers
Your lifetime earnings would be ~£6m (2x the doctor, 4x the academic).
12,000 lives saved and 4x the income to live on.
At the top end, lifetime earnings can reach well beyond £20m (~10x the academic).
MONEY-MAKINGMoney-making is an attractive option.
It’s attainable. Almost any Oxford graduate can make a lot of money
It’s high impact with relatively high certainty. The benefits are quantified, and had with high
confidence compared to most forms of career impact.
It’s flexible. One can contribute to the most effective causes one
knows at the time.
MONEY-MAKINGSome people have been convinced already...
GWWC Member, Mark Lee, is terminating his philosophy PhD to take up corporate law.
We’ll use money-making as our baseline to compare with other high impact careers.
RESEARCH Some researchers have
done huge amounts of good.
Norman Borlaug, in developing disease resistant wheat, directly saved 250mn people.
Even taking into account marginal benefit, his impact is likely in the tens of millions.
But for most scientists, there is a significant marginal benefit problem. Often, the same research would have happened
anyway, only a couple of years later.
And a lot of research doesn’t have much effect at all...
Source: Power-law distributions for the citation index of scientific publications and scientists Braz. J. Phys. vol.35 no.4a São Paulo Dec. 2005
Top 0.01% of papers cited 100-1000x more than median
RESEARCH And watch out for bias!
The Illusion of Superiority. We systematically overestimate our ability. e.g.:
87% of a sample of Stanford MBA students rated themselves above the median in terms of their academic performance.
25% percent of a sample of SAT-takers put themselves in the top 1% in terms of leadership abilities.
SHOULD I RESEARCH? For a research career to have the chance of
being this high impact you need to:1. Be near the top of your year.2. Consider re-training to work on a high impact
area.
Areas for consideration: cost-effectiveness research, policy development, development economics, high impact ethics, medical research, technology.
RESEARCH
The Moral: If you think that you are near the top of your year group, consider going into high-value research. Be prepared to retrain.
INFLUENCING
One can influence other people to do high-impact activities.
Consider, for example, the canny persuader. She decides not to make money, but instead to persuade others to make money in order to give it away. In one year, she persuades 10 Oxford students to become professional donors.
INFLUENCING Over the course of their careers:
An professional donor can easily save ten thousand lives.
A canny persuader could easily convince one hundred people to become altruistic bankers.
So one canny persuader could save one million lives.
Which would look like this:
INFLUENCING Surely this is a definitive argument,
therefore, for becoming an influencer rather than a money-maker?
Well.. not quite. One can also pay people to influence people to make money and donate it. And pay people to influence people to pay people to influence people…
There’s a regress.
INFLUENCER VS MONEY-MAKERAnd there are some important caveats:
Probably the most effective way to persuade people to earn money and donate, is to do so yourself!
Very few people go into money-making jobs with the purpose of donating to charity – big influence!
Money-makers will find it easier to meet and influence other high earners.
DIRECT INFLUENCE
Cost-effectiveness is so un-stressed that the best health charities are 10,000x more effective than the worst.
Influencing NGO and government policy could be very high impact.
POLITICS Provided you meet minimum standards of ‘charisma’,
as Oxford graduates, you have relatively good odds of becoming an MP
By holding out for increases in the aid budget, increases in cost-effectiveness, policy reform supporting development, and so on, you could have a huge direct impact.
UK Aid budget is ~£9bn. A 3.3% increase could save 1mn lives. If you have a 1% chance of personally making the difference, you save 10,000 expected lives per year!.
You also have a platform from which to indirectly influence.
OTHER RELEVANT CONSIDERATIONS: THE RETURN OF THE STANDARD VIEW Talents, Passions
These are relevant, insofar as, within a career, you are more likely to do well if you are naturally talented or interested in the area.
This reduces the marginal benefit problem – if you’re high achieving, the person who would replace you is not as good.
Risk of Burnout This is very important: your estimates of how
much good each career does must be discounted by how likely you are to give up your career or your plans to donate
SOME KEY QUESTIONS How much money could you earn and
donate?
Are you a gifted researcher?
Could you influence policy?
How can you best persuade people to donate?
Some combination of these?
CONCLUSION: THE MORALS – PART I
•Earning big and donating can do more than directly benefiting.
Benefit Indirectly
•Do something that wouldn’t have happened anyway. Don’t be
Replaceable•Your gut isn’t good enough.Quantify
•You can have a both a high-flying lifestyle and a massive impact.
No Need to Sacrifice
•High-impact careers needn’t also harm the world.
Understand Harm
CONCLUSION: THE MORALS – PART II
•Earning big and donating should be your baseline career choice.Make Money
•Exceptional people working in neglected but high-value areas can have a huge impact.
Research• Consider whether you can have
influence over more money than you can make.
Influence
•You’ll do better if you are naturally talented or interested in the area.Consider
Yourself
•Take into account the risk that you’ll give up.Don’t Burn Out
FINAL CONCLUSION
You can do huge amounts of good if you really aim for it. But the means to that end are not intuitive.
If you are convinced to any extent by the arguments given above, please come and speak to us.