Date post: | 01-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | agatha-flowers |
View: | 220 times |
Download: | 2 times |
Don McKenzie PaulUniversity of Warwick
Don McKenzie PaulUniversity of Warwick
The Vortex Lattice in Superconductors
as seen by neutron diffractionAn Introduction and some
examples.
The Vortex Lattice in Superconductors
as seen by neutron diffractionAn Introduction and some
examples.
Charles Dewhurst, Bob Cubitt
Institut Laüe Langevin
Charles Dewhurst, Bob Cubitt
Institut Laüe Langevin
Mohana YethirajOak Ridge National
Lab.
Mohana YethirajOak Ridge National
Lab.
Simon Levett, Nicola BancroftSonya Crowe, Geetha Balakrishnan
Simon Levett, Nicola BancroftSonya Crowe, Geetha Balakrishnan
Ted Forgan & his groupTed Forgan & his group
Type II Superconductivity is characterised by the mixed state or vortex state.Predicted by A. A. Abrikosov in 1957First observed by Cribier et. al. in 1967 by neutron diffractionLater imaged directly by Essman & Traüble in 1968 by Bitter decoration
Type II Superconductivity is characterised by the mixed state or vortex state.Predicted by A. A. Abrikosov in 1957First observed by Cribier et. al. in 1967 by neutron diffractionLater imaged directly by Essman & Traüble in 1968 by Bitter decoration
Hexagonal VL in an PbIn alloy at 1.1 K and 40 mT
(Traüble and Essmann, 1968)
Hexagonal VL in an PbIn alloy at 1.1 K and 40 mT
(Traüble and Essmann, 1968)
Vortex penetration into single crystalErNi2B2C
(N. Saha et al., 2000)
Vortex penetration into single crystalErNi2B2C
(N. Saha et al., 2000)
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
also can use µSR to determine density of states for the magnetic
field
also can use µSR to determine density of states for the magnetic
field
BBn(B
)n(B
)
Basics of Vortices in SuperconductorsBasics of Vortices in Superconductors
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Length scales:
ξ – coherence length(distance over which the SC order parameter can be suppressed)
λ – penetration depth(screening length of magnetic fields)
Ratio: κ = λ / ξ defines Type II behaviour
Length scales:
ξ – coherence length(distance over which the SC order parameter can be suppressed)
λ – penetration depth(screening length of magnetic fields)
Ratio: κ = λ / ξ defines Type II behaviour
Determines ‘neutron contrast’
and controls intensity as 1/λ4
• Abrikosov initially predicted a Square VL… he changed his mind later!
• A Hexagonal VL is more energetically favorable but the energy difference is very small.
• Abrikosov initially predicted a Square VL… he changed his mind later!
• A Hexagonal VL is more energetically favorable but the energy difference is very small.
Basics of Vortices in SuperconductorsBasics of Vortices in Superconductors
These individual vortices interact
through their currents and the state of minimal
energy is a lattice configuration
These individual vortices interact
through their currents and the state of minimal
energy is a lattice configuration
Choice of field Orientation?
Choice of field Orientation?Horizontal field
parallel to neutron beam
Horizontal field parallel to neutron
beam
Vertical field perpendicular to neutron beam
Vertical field perpendicular to neutron beam
which is the better orientation for experiments?
which is the better orientation for experiments?
OK, I’ll state my preference in most casesOK, I’ll state my preference in most casesreally depends on many things!really depends on many things!
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Images from an ExperimentImages from an Experiment
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Rocking Curve
Diffraction from a Vortex LatticeDiffraction from a Vortex Lattice
• High Intensity- Investigate the VL close to the temperature or field where superconductivity is destroyed.- Investigate materials with long penetration depth e.g. High Tc’s, Organic SC’s.
- Time resolved studies
• High Resolution- Determine complex vortex morphologies.- Phase transitions in the vortex lattice. - Spatially resolved studies.
• High Intensity- Investigate the VL close to the temperature or field where superconductivity is destroyed.- Investigate materials with long penetration depth e.g. High Tc’s, Organic SC’s.
- Time resolved studies
• High Resolution- Determine complex vortex morphologies.- Phase transitions in the vortex lattice. - Spatially resolved studies.
D22
Wiggle(10%, field x sine)
• We ‘shake’ the VL to try to induce better perfection of the lattice, closer to the equilibrium vortex distribution(magnetisation).• Procedure is analogous to de-magnetising a ferromagnet.
Before(field cooled)
YNi2B2C, 2.5K, 100mT
After (field cooled +
wiggle)
YNi2B2C, 2.5K, 100mT + 10%
• Small perturbation or ‘shaking’ of the
disordered field-cooled vortex lattice
introduces better orientational order.
Optimum ~ 10% amplitude.
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Shake that Vortex LatticeShake that Vortex Lattice
• Miniature magnetic Hall sensors allow the ‘local-induction’ to be measured and therefore monitor static and dynamic properties of the vortex lattice.• This local induction tool is quite a different probe to the approach using Neutrons!
Schematic of a crystal mounted on a miniature
Hall sensor array.
Optical microscope image of the Hall
sensor array.
‘Optically smooth’ YNi2B2C single crystal
~200x90x70μm.
Single crystal HoNi2B2C polished into a prism to reduce the geometrical
barrier.
~1000x150x50μm.
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Source of the Disorder in the Vortex Lattice
Source of the Disorder in the Vortex Lattice
• Local magnetic probe arrays work like conventional magnetic sensors, but with spatial resolution. Only type-II superconductors exhibit a spatially varying magnetic induction on the macroscopic scale.
Detailed field profiles show the asymmetric penetration of vortices and the workings of vortex pinning, surface
and geometrical barrier effects. Non-magnetic species dominated by surface
barriers, bulk pinning controls the Vortex lattice in the magnetic states.
‘Local’ magnetisation curves.
Collaborations with:Weizmann Institute, IsraelUniversity of CambridgeUniversity of WarwickUniversity of Leiden Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Source of the Disorder in the Vortex Lattice
Source of the Disorder in the Vortex Lattice
Advantages & Disadvantages of usingNeutron Diffraction to study the Vortex
Lattice
Advantages & Disadvantages of usingNeutron Diffraction to study the Vortex
LatticeInvestigation of the VL in the bulk of the
samplenot surface dependent
Investigation of the VL in the bulk of the sample
not surface dependentAlmost any combination of temperature & field
possible T (50mK - 100K)
H (20 Oe - 100,000 Oe)
Almost any combination of temperature & field possible
T (50mK - 100K)H (20 Oe - 100,000 Oe)Neutrons go through walls
pressure experiments should be possible!Neutrons go through walls
pressure experiments should be possible!
Shame that neutron diffraction is flux limited and extremely sensitive to the contrast
large samples requiredlarge penetration depth is hard
1000 Å is relatively easy10,000 Å is ~10,000 times more difficult
Shame that neutron diffraction is flux limited and extremely sensitive to the contrast
large samples requiredlarge penetration depth is hard
1000 Å is relatively easy10,000 Å is ~10,000 times more difficult
What do neutrons see well about the vortex lattice ?
What do neutrons see well about the vortex lattice ?
Average Morphologyand in particular changes
in symmetry of the VL.
Average Morphologyand in particular changes
in symmetry of the VL.
Should be able to extract the form-factor and hence
the distribution of magnetic induction around
the vortex core, but it’s hard.
Should be able to extract the form-factor and hence
the distribution of magnetic induction around
the vortex core, but it’s hard.
TmNi2B2CPhase transition in a magnetically ordered superconducting state
TmNi2B2CPhase transition in a magnetically ordered superconducting state
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
What has been done?What has been done?
YBCO Is there really a lattice?
Role of twin planesZig-Zag vortices
BSSCOMelting and Decomposition
Sr2RuO4Supporting evidence for p-wave superconductivity
UPt3Changes in superconducting order parameter
YNi2B2CChanges in Vortex Lattice structurewith magnetic field and temperature
Magnetic SuperconductorsChanges in morphology with magnetic order
Changes in core size with susceptibility
YBCO Is there really a lattice?
Role of twin planesZig-Zag vortices
BSSCOMelting and Decomposition
Sr2RuO4Supporting evidence for p-wave superconductivity
UPt3Changes in superconducting order parameter
YNi2B2CChanges in Vortex Lattice structurewith magnetic field and temperature
Magnetic SuperconductorsChanges in morphology with magnetic order
Changes in core size with susceptibility
all figures from S.T. Johnson et. al. PRL 82, 2792, 1999all figures from S.T. Johnson et. al. PRL 82, 2792, 1999
Square Lattice in YBCO?Square Lattice in YBCO?
Early work on YBCO showed an “apparent” square lattice?
Early work on YBCO showed an “apparent” square lattice? E.M.Forgan et. al. Nature 343,
735,1990E.M.Forgan et. al. Nature 343,
735,1990Eventually, we got “de-twinned” samples good enoughEventually, we got “de-twinned” samples good enough
YBCO 0,51 TH || c, a axis vertical
YBCO 0,51 TH || c, a axis vertical
YBCO 0,20 TH ~1º off c, a axis
vertical
YBCO 0,20 TH ~1º off c, a axis
vertical
Square Lattices do exist however
Square Lattices do exist however
Strong supporting evidence for p-wave superconductivity in Sr2RuO4
Strong supporting evidence for p-wave superconductivity in Sr2RuO4
Flux-Line Decomposition & Melting BSSCO
Flux-Line Decomposition & Melting BSSCO
Loss of coherent lattice structure with the application of a magnetic field, pancake vortices and in-plane
pinning
Loss of coherent lattice structure with the application of a magnetic field, pancake vortices and in-plane
pinningLoss of coherent lattice structure with increasing temperature
vortex lattice meltingLoss of coherent lattice structure with increasing temperature
vortex lattice melting
Increasing field
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Field dependent Transition in the Vortex Lattice
Field dependent Transition in the Vortex Lattice
H2H2
H1H1
• At high enough fields a stable square configuration is reached.
• There is no evidence for the presence of any residual low-field hexagonal VL
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Field dependent Transition in the Vortex Lattice
Field dependent Transition in the Vortex Lattice
H > H2H > H2
As H → H2, β smoothly opens up and
approaches 90 °
ββ
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Field dependent Transition in the Vortex Lattice
Field dependent Transition in the Vortex Lattice
H1 < H < H2H1 < H < H2
Decrease in β ⇒ [110] becomes the nearest neighbour direction
ββ
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Field dependent Transition in the Vortex Lattice
Field dependent Transition in the Vortex Lattice
H < H1H < H1
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Diffraction from a Vortex LatticeDiffraction from a Vortex Lattice
ββ Coexistence of all possible domains. No
way we can go smoothly from one configuration to the
other. First order transition?.
Coexistence of all possible domains. No
way we can go smoothly from one configuration to the
other. First order transition?.
ββ
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Fermi Surface Anisotropy and non-local
Electrodynamics
Fermi Surface Anisotropy and non-local
Electrodynamics Deviations from the Abrikosov (hexagonal) lattice have been reported in many conventional superconductors, showing strong correlation to the symmetry of the underlying electronic structure perpendicular to H.
The physical argument in many cases is that nonlocality introduces a distortion of the distribution of supercurrent flowing around the normal core of a vortex, resulting in an anisotropic contribution to the intervortex interaction.
The magnitude of the distortion of the distribution of supercurrents is proportional to the degree of anisotropy of the Fermi surface and cleanness of the electronic system.
With increasing applied field the density of the mutually repulsive vortices increases, forming a close-packed structure under the influence of the distortion of the distribution of supercurrents.
Fermi surface anisotropy and high-field flux line arrangement in
YNi2B2C
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Fermi Surface Anisotropy and non-local
Electrodynamics
Fermi Surface Anisotropy and non-local
Electrodynamics
Kogan et al. have developed a model which incorporates nonlocal corrections to the London theory of superconductivity to describe the morphology of the VL.
The model adds extra terms to describe the distribution of supercurrents within each vortex, depending on the Fermi velocities averaged over the Fermi surface (j(r) is determined by A within a domain ~ ξ0 around r).
VL free energy density is then calculated using knowledge of the magnetic field distribution about each vortex.
V. G. Kogan et al., “The Superconducting State in Magnetic Fields”, ed. Sa de Melo (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998) 127
FOR MORE INFO...
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Fermi Surface Anisotropy and non-local
Electrodynamics II
Fermi Surface Anisotropy and non-local
Electrodynamics II
Izawa et al.
Angular resolved thermal conductivity, Izawa et al. PRL 86, 2653 (2002).
4-fold symmetric Hc2(θ) in TmNi2B2C, Warwick data Unpublished.
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Other Influences : Nodes and Gap Anisotropy
Other Influences : Nodes and Gap Anisotropy
• Substantial evidence has been presented to show that the Superconducting Gap in the Borocarbides is NOT isotropic s-wave.• Substantial evidence has been presented to show that the Superconducting Gap in the Borocarbides is NOT isotropic s-wave.
• Recent thermal conductivity work by Izawa et al. show Δ has point nodes along [100] and [010].• Recent thermal conductivity work by Izawa et al. show Δ has point nodes along [100] and [010].
• 4-fold symmetric in-plane Hc2(θ)
• 4-fold symmetric c-axis thermal conductivity vs. in-plane field.
• 4-fold symmetric in-plane Hc2(θ)
• 4-fold symmetric c-axis thermal conductivity vs. in-plane field.
Point Node Gap, Izawa et al.
Anisotropic Fermi-Surface
Nakai et al. (Pre-print)
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Other Influences : Nodes and Gap Anisotropy
Other Influences : Nodes and Gap Anisotropy
More complicated picture predicts additional phase
transitions as a function of field and temperature
More complicated picture predicts additional phase
transitions as a function of field and temperature
• Nonlocal effects should weaken with increasing temperature and in fact may disappear close to Tc2(H)
due to thermal fluctuations.• Similar behaviour with impurity doping (Eskildsen et al.).
Apex angle, β, vs. field @ temperature
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Other Influences : Nodes and Gap Anisotropy
Other Influences : Nodes and Gap Anisotropy
No evidence for anything but similar effects as seen at low
temperature
No evidence for anything but similar effects as seen at low
temperature
• The order parameter symmetry should remain the same over the entire phase diagram.
• What is the overall VL phase diagram in the presence of both Fermi surface anisotropy + non-locality and an anisotropic order parameter?
LuNi2B2C
B//c Eskildsen
• What is ‘clear’ is that the VL in the borocarbides does not appear to be a simple Hexagonal lattice even with weak non-locality.
• Need to consider both effects, the underlying anisotropies e.g. Fermi surface and gap anisotropy.
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Other Influences : Nodes and Gap Anisotropy
Other Influences : Nodes and Gap Anisotropy
UPt3, Phase Transition by a change in superconducting order parameter
UPt3, Phase Transition by a change in superconducting order parameter
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
V3Si : another non-local superconductorV3Si : another non-local superconductor
ErNi2B2C shows examples of reorientation and square phase transitions
T = 2.0 KH = 450 mT
T = 5.8 KH = 200 mT
T = 4.0 KH = 20 mT
Similar to YNi2B2C
ErNi2B2C
TN = 6 K
TC = 11 K
Fairly simple modulated structure in zero field but with “squaring up” at low T and the development of even harmonics. Below 1.6 K a “ferromagnetic” component develops. Becomes even more complicated in a field.
Vortex distortion responds to the changes at TN. Vortex lattice is square at lower fields near to TN.
Small change in penetration depth but slope is different. Certain change in superconducting state through TN again probably due to
changes in core size and coherence length
“Ferromagnetic” component appears to be a series of randomly oriented “domain wall planes” with moments aligned parallel to each other, hence the rods of scattering. These objects cut the vortices and can act as pinning centres
TmNi2B2C : the Role of Paramagnetic
Moments
TmNi2B2C : the Role of Paramagnetic
Moments
Tc = 10.5 KTn = 1.5 KTc = 10.5 KTn = 1.5 K
Low Tn and high Tc large paramagnetic susceptibility
with field along the c-axis
Low Tn and high Tc large paramagnetic susceptibility
with field along the c-axis
Type II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex latticeType II Superconductivity : the mixed state and vortex lattice
Some Final ThoughtsSome Final Thoughts
A powerful technique to look at an interesting phase of
matter
A subtle, soft solid of wobbly lines
Crystal Growth & Annealing
Novel and unusual phase transitions
Disorder, Dimensionality and Anisotropy are of interest
bending, pinning, twisting,melting, decomposition etc
Need better theoretical models
even for the ‘simplest’ materials
A powerful technique to look at an interesting phase of
matter
A subtle, soft solid of wobbly lines
Crystal Growth & Annealing
Novel and unusual phase transitions
Disorder, Dimensionality and Anisotropy are of interest
bending, pinning, twisting,melting, decomposition etc
Need better theoretical models
even for the ‘simplest’ materials