DORCHESTER-ARNOLD-POCKET NORTH-HARLAN ......DORCHESTER-ARNOLD-POCKET NORTH-HARLAN 161KV PROJECT ii...

KU Energy, LLC-Old Dominion Power Company

DORCHESTER-ARNOLD-POCKET NORTH-HARLAN 161KV PROJECT

Application for Approval and Certification of Electric

Facilities

DEQ Supplement

Application No. ___

Case No. ___-2020-_____

May 2020

m KU®PPL companies

Attachment IIIPage 1 of 569


i

CONTENTS

Acronyms and Abbreviations ........................................................................................................................ iii

1 Project Description............................................................................................................................... 1-1

2 Environmental Analysis ....................................................................................................................... 2-1

A. Air Quality .................................................................................................................................... 2-1

B. Water Source ............................................................................................................................... 2-1

C. Discharge of Cooling Waters ....................................................................................................... 2-9

D. Tidal and Non-tidal Wetlands .................................................................................................... 2-10

E. Solid and Hazardous Waste ...................................................................................................... 2-16

F. Natural Heritage, Threatened and Endangered Species .......................................................... 2-17

G. Erosion and Sediment Control .................................................................................................. 2-28

H. Archaeological, Historic, Scenic, Cultural, or Architectural Resources ..................................... 2-28

I. Chesapeake Bay Reservation Areas ........................................................................................ 2-29

J. Wildlife Resources ..................................................................................................................... 2-29

K. Recreation, Agriculture, and Forest Resources ........................................................................ 2-29

L. Use of Pesticides and Herbicides .............................................................................................. 2-30

M. Geology and Mineral Resources ............................................................................................... 2-30

N. Transportation Infrastructure ..................................................................................................... 2-31

3 References .......................................................................................................................................... 3-1

TABLES

Table 1. Waterbodies Located Within the Study Area ............................................................................... 2-1

Table 2. Wetlands Located Within the Study Area .................................................................................. 2-11

Table 3. Species Impact Determinations ................................................................................................. 2-19

FIGURES

Figures 1-1 to 1-9 Topographic Map

Figures 2-1 to 2-9 Land Use Map

Figures 3-1 to 3-22 Wetland, Waterbody, and Floodplain Map



ii

APPENDICES

Appendix A Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Area/Corridor Report

Appendix B U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Information, Planning and Conservation System Official

Species List

Appendix C Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation-Division of Natural Heritage

Response

Appendix D Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information Service Search Report

Appendix E Architectural and Historical Resources Pre-Application Analysis



iii

ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS

AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System

APE Area of Potential Effect

DCR Department of Conservation and Recreation

DEQ Department of Environmental Quality

DMME Department of Mines, Minerals, and Energy

DNH Division of Natural Heritage

EDR Environmental Data Resources, Inc.

FAA Federal Aviation Administration

FE Federally Endangered

FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency

FT Federally Threatened

HUC Hydrologic Unit Code

IPaC Information, Planning and Conservation database

KV kilovolt

KU-ODP KU Energy, LLC-Old Dominion Power Company

NAVAID navigational aid

NHD National Hydrography Dataset

NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service

NWI National Wetlands Inventory

Project Dorchester-Arnold-Pocket North-Harlan 161kV Project

quadrangle quad

ROW right-of-way

SCU Stream Conservation Unit

SE State Endangered

ST State Threatened

TOYR Time of Year Restriction

USACE U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

USGS U.S. Geological Survey



iv

UST underground storage tank

VaFWIS Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information Service

VDGIF Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries

WOUS Water of the United States



v

Based on consultations with the Department Environmental Quality (DEQ), KU Energy, LLC-Old Dominion

Power Company (KU-ODP) has developed this DEQ Supplement to facilitate review and analysis of the

proposed Dorchester-Arnold-Pocket North-Harlan 161kV Project (Project) by the DEQ and other relevant

agencies.



1-1

1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Project involves the repair and/or replacement of support structures associated with three existing

transmission lines located in the western part of Virginia. This work is needed to maintain the structural

integrity of KU-ODP’s transmission lines and to continue providing reliable electric service to its Virginia

customers. The following lines are impacted:

Dorchester-Arnold: a 14-mile-long, 161 kilovolt (kV) transmission line requiring the repair of 6 structures and the replacement of 27 structures.

Dorchester-Pocket North: a 26-mile-long, 161 kV transmission line requiring the repair of 22 structures and the replacement of 89 structures.

Harlan-Pocket North: a 5-mile-long, 161 kV transmission line requiring the repair of 3 structures and the replacement of 5 structures.

Repairs may include but are not limited to replacing down guys, changing insulators, repairing static wire,

bonding, and repairing woodpecker holes. The existing structures proposed for replacement are between

45 and 100 feet tall and new structures will either be the same height or between 5 to 10 feet taller than the

existing structures. The transmission line structures are located within KU-ODP’s existing right-of-way (ROW) in Harlan County, Kentucky and Lee and Wise Counties, Virginia; only portions of the transmission

lines in Virginia are described herein. The Study Area is a 200-foot-wide corridor centered on the Project

centerline (i.e., the existing transmission line centerlines) and encompasses the existing transmission line

ROW, which has a width of between 100 and 200 feet, depending on the location. The locations of the

transmission lines and structures are shown in Figures 1-1 – 1-9. Because the Project involves the replacement of structures within KU-ODP’s existing ROW, no alternative routes are proposed for the Project.



2-1

2 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS

A. Air Quality

Due to the nature of the Project, no permanent impacts to air quality are anticipated as a result of Project

operation. Temporary air quality impacts would occur during Project construction. The proposed Project

construction will require tree clearing along some access roads and the side trimming of some trees within

the existing ROW. KU-ODP does not expect to burn cleared material; however, if burning is required KU-

ODP will coordinate with the local agencies to obtain the required permits and will comply with any permit

conditions. Equipment and vehicles that are powered by gasoline or diesel motors will be used during the

construction activities; these vehicles will produce exhaust gas as a byproduct of combustion. Project

construction contractors will be encouraged to minimize truck idling to the extent practicable to minimize

the amount of exhaust gas produced. If during construction the weather is dry for an extended period of

time, dust and other particulate matter could become airborne due to the use of vehicles and equipment

within the ROW. It is anticipated, however, that minimal earth disturbance will take place and vehicle speed,

which is often a factor in airborne particulate emissions, will be kept to a minimum. KU-ODP will implement

best management practices for dust suppression as needed during Project construction.

No significant impacts to air quality are anticipated as a result of the proposed Project. KU-ODP will monitor

construction activities and enact appropriate mitigation techniques as necessary to minimize temporary

impacts to air quality.

B. Water Source

It is noted that a water source is not required for the Project, which proposes the replacement and repair of

existing transmission line structures. As such, this discussion focuses on waterbodies that are located within

the Study Area. A desktop review of U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps (ESRI, 2015) and

the USGS National Hydrography Dataset (NHD; USGS, 2019) indicated that 73 perennial or intermittent

waterbodies flow through the Study Area.

Topographic map contours suggest that ephemeral and additional intermittent streams, beyond those

included in the NHD, may also be present. However, for an evaluation of this type the presence and

dimensions of waterbodies are difficult to determine using even the highest resolution and most recent

desktop reference materials. Large floodplains containing broad, flat topography can be assessed fairly

accurately using aerial photography. However, smaller secondary drainages containing lower order

streams are more difficult to evaluate and could contain a high degree of deviation when compared to field

conditions. Therefore, all site conditions predicted as a part of this desktop analysis and in the mapping

provided are considered preliminary. Waterbodies identified as being within the Study Area are shown on

the Wetland, Waterbody, and Floodplain Map (Figures 3-1 – 3-22). Additional waterbody characteristics

are detailed in Table 1, below.



2-1

Table 1. Waterbodies Located Within the Study Area

Crossing ID Waterbody

Name Route Name Flow Regime

Approximate

Location (Latitude)

Approximate

Location (Longitude)

Figure 3

Page

Number

Approximate

Length within

Study Area

(Linear Feet)

12-Digit

Hydrologic Unit

Code (HUC)

S001 McHenry Fork Dorchester-

Arnold Intermittent 36.9628528 -82.83907647 3 206 060102060103

S002 Mudlick Creek Dorchester-

Arnold Perennial 36.96114292 -82.83302733 3 210 060102060103



S004 UNT to

Mudlick Creek

Dorchester-



Arnold Perennial 36.95935992 -82.82973021 1, 2 610 060102060103

S006 UNT to

Mudlick Creek

Dorchester-


S007 Halls Branch Dorchester-


S008 UNT to

Mudlick Creek

Dorchester-


S009 UNT to

Mudlick Creek

Dorchester-


S010 UNT to

Mudlick Creek

Dorchester-


S011 Miller Branch Dorchester-




2-2




Approximate

Location (Latitude)

Approximate


Figure 3

Page

Number

Approximate

Length within

Study Area

(Linear Feet)

12-Digit

Hydrologic Unit

Code (HUC)

S012 UNT to Miller

Branch

Dorchester-


S013 Callahan

Creek

Dorchester-


S014

UNT to

Callahan

Creek

Dorchester-


S015 UNT to

Roaring Fork

Dorchester-


S016 Roaring Fork Dorchester-


S017 UNT to

Roaring Fork

Dorchester-


S018 UNT to

Roaring Fork

Dorchester-


S019 UNT to

Roaring Fork

Dorchester-


S020

UNT to

Canepatch

Creek

Dorchester-


S021 Canepatch

Creek

Dorchester-


S022

UNT to

Canepatch

Creek

Dorchester-




2-3




Approximate

Location (Latitude)

Approximate


Figure 3

Page

Number

Approximate

Length within

Study Area

(Linear Feet)

12-Digit

Hydrologic Unit

Code (HUC)

S023 Bear Branch Dorchester-


S024 Black Creek Dorchester-


S025 Thacker

Branch

Dorchester-


S026

UNT to

Thacker

Branch

Dorchester-


S027 Powell River Dorchester-



Pocket North Perennial 36.93271488 -82.64746345 9 284 060102060102

S029 Thacker

Branch

Dorchester-


S030 UNT to Powell

River

Dorchester-


S031 UNT to Powell

River

Dorchester-


S032 Black Creek Dorchester-


S033 UNT to Powell

River

Dorchester-


S034 Bear Branch Dorchester-




2-4




Approximate

Location (Latitude)

Approximate


Figure 3

Page

Number

Approximate

Length within

Study Area

(Linear Feet)

12-Digit

Hydrologic Unit

Code (HUC)

S035 UNT to Powell

River

Dorchester-


S036 UNT to Powell

River

Dorchester-


S037 UNT to Powell

River

Dorchester-




S039 UNT to Powell

River

Dorchester-


S040 Bens Branch Dorchester-


S041 UNT to Powell

River

Dorchester-

Pocket North Intermittent 36.89690377 -82.77033796 14 690 060102060104

S042 UNT to Powell

River

Dorchester-


S043 UNT to Powell

River

Dorchester-




S045 Pigeon Creek Dorchester-






2-5




Approximate

Location (Latitude)

Approximate


Figure 3

Page

Number

Approximate

Length within

Study Area

(Linear Feet)

12-Digit

Hydrologic Unit

Code (HUC)

S047 Laurel Fork Dorchester-



Pocket North Perennial 36.87831574 -82.81891145 8, 9 188 060102060104

S049 UNT to Laurel

Fork

Dorchester-


S050 UNT to Laurel

Fork

Dorchester-


S051 UNT to Laurel

Fork

Dorchester-


S052

UNT to

Craborchard

Creek

Dorchester-


S053 Craborchard

Creek

Dorchester-

Pocket North Perennial 36.8675782 -82.86915549 6, 7 303 060102060202

S054

UNT to

Craborchard

Creek

Dorchester-


S055

UNT to

Craborchard

Creek

Dorchester-


S056

UNT to

Craborchard

Creek

Dorchester-


S057 Moore Branch Dorchester-




2-6




Approximate

Location (Latitude)

Approximate


Figure 3

Page

Number

Approximate

Length within

Study Area

(Linear Feet)

12-Digit

Hydrologic Unit

Code (HUC)

S058

UNT to

Craborchard

Creek

Dorchester-


S059 Meadow

Branch

Dorchester-


S060 Jordon Branch Dorchester-


S061 UNT to Jordon

Branch

Dorchester-


S062

UNT to North

Fork Powell

River

Dorchester-


S063 UNT to Bundy

Creek

Dorchester-


S064 Bundy Creek Dorchester-


S065 UNT to Bundy

Creek

Dorchester-


S066 UNT to Bundy

Creek

Dorchester-


S067 UNT to Cox

Creek

Dorchester-


S068 UNT to Cox

Creek

Dorchester-




2-7




Approximate

Location (Latitude)

Approximate


Figure 3

Page

Number

Approximate

Length within

Study Area

(Linear Feet)

12-Digit

Hydrologic Unit

Code (HUC)

S069 UNT to Cox

Creek

Dorchester-


S070 Cox Creek Dorchester-


S071 Jones Creek Dorchester-


S072 UNT to Jones

Creek

Dorchester-


S073 UNT to Jones

Creek

Dorchester-


S074 Reeds Creek Dorchester-


S075 Wolf Harbor

Branch

Dorchester-


S076 Rocklick

Branch

Dorchester-


S077 Sandick

Branch

Dorchester-


S078 Straight Creek Harlan-Pocket

North Perennial 36.78812584 -83.05678999 15, 16 201 060102060203

S079 Puckett Creek Harlan-Pocket

North Perennial 36.78554889 -83.06656246 16 260 060102060203

S080 UNT to

Puckett Creek

Harlan-Pocket

North Intermittent 36.78416204 -83.07240816 21, 22 503 060102060203



2-8




Approximate

Location (Latitude)

Approximate


Figure 3

Page

Number

Approximate

Length within

Study Area

(Linear Feet)

12-Digit

Hydrologic Unit

Code (HUC)

S081 Wolf Branch Harlan-Pocket

North Intermittent 36.78168853 -83.0811905 21 66 060102060203

S082 Ely Creek Harlan-Pocket

North Perennial 36.77849082 -83.10145685 21 248 060102060203

S083 UNT to Ely

Creek

Harlan-Pocket


S084 UNT to Stone

Creek

Harlan-Pocket


S085 UNT to Stone

Creek

Harlan-Pocket


S086 Stone Creek Harlan-Pocket


Notes:

Waterbody locations were determined using the NHD (USGS, 2019). An accurate assessment of actual waterbodies and impacts can only be determined by conducting a wetland and waterbody

delineation based on the 1987 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987), the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers

Wetland Delineation Manual: Eastern Mountains and Piedmont Region (Regional Supplement; USACE, 2012), and other USACE guidance documents. Additional ephemeral and intermittent

waterbodies not identified in this table may be present within the Study Area.



2-9

According to the USACE, no waters considered navigable under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act

are located within the Study Area (USACE, 2010). It is noted that portions of the Powell River are considered

a Section 10 water, but not the portion of the Powell River within the Study Area.

Waterbody impacts will be reduced to the greatest extent practicable during Project construction. It is

anticipated that any waterbody impacts that do occur will be temporary in nature and limited to temporary

equipment crossings. If a replacement structure cannot be accessed from existing roads, KU-ODP may

need to install a temporary culvert or temporary bridge to cross small streams. This would require the

placement of temporary fill material on erosion control fabric that would be removed when work is

completed, returning the surface to original contours. Soil erosion during Project construction may also

temporarily impact water quality within waterbodies located in the Study Area, causing increased turbidity

and sedimentation. Impacts to water quality from soil erosion will be minimized through the use of Project-

specific erosion control measures, which would be consistent with Virginia’s Erosion and Sediment Control

Handbook and the Old Dominion Power Company Annual Standards and Specifications: Erosion and

Sediment Control; Stormwater Management.

Erosion and sediment controls will be installed prior to any clearing or grading and maintained in good

working order to minimize impacts to waterbodies. These controls will remain in place until the area is

stabilized and will then be removed. Any exposed slopes or stream banks will be stabilized immediately

upon completion of work in each permitted area. All denuded areas will be properly stabilized in accordance

with the Virginia Erosion and Sediment Control Handbook. No machinery will enter surface waters, unless

authorized by a Virginia Water Protection permit. Heavy equipment in temporarily impacted surface waters

will be placed on mats, geotextile fabric, or other suitable material to minimize soil disturbance to the

maximum extent practicable. Equipment and materials will be removed immediately upon completion of

work. All construction, construction access, and demolition activities associated with the Project will be

accomplished in a manner that minimizes construction materials or waste materials from entering surface

waters, unless authorized by a permit.

Based on the desktop evaluation of the above-mentioned resources, jurisdictional waterbodies (those that

are hydrologically connected to a Waters of the United States [WOUS]) are likely present within the Study

Area. An accurate assessment of actual waterbodies and impacts can only be determined by conducting a

wetland and waterbody delineation based on the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual

(Environmental Laboratory, 1987), the Regional Supplement (USACE, 2012), and other USACE guidance

documents. Additional ephemeral and intermittent waterbodies not identified by the desktop analysis may

be present within the Study Area.

Waterbody impacts will be reduced to the greatest extent practicable during Project construction. It is

anticipated any waterbody impacts that do occur will be temporary in nature and limited to temporary

equipment crossings. No permanent waterbody impacts are expected for the Project.

C. Discharge of Cooling Waters

No discharge of cooling water is associated with the Project.



2-10

D. Tidal and Non-tidal Wetlands

No tidal wetlands are associated with the Project.

KU-ODP reviewed the following resources as part of a desktop analysis to identify the potential location

and extent of non-tidal wetlands within the Study Area:

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) Web

Soil Survey (NRCS, 2020). Generally, soil units identified as hydric contain soils that indicate through

their color and structure that they have experienced dominantly reducing (i.e., oxygen poor) conditions,

which are a result of inundation and/or saturation by water. Soil units identified as non-hydric have no

hydric soil components identified in the mapped soil unit. Areas with hydric soils have a greater

probability of supporting wetlands than areas with non-hydric soils.

United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) dataset (USFWS,

2001). The NWI is an index of locations identified by USFWS as areas that exhibit wetland

characteristics on aerial photography. NWI wetlands are classified according to the Cowardin

classification system (USFWS, 2011). The information is often out of date and not necessarily field-

verified. The presence of an NWI feature is not a definitive indicator that a wetland is present.

USGS topographic maps (Pennington Gap, Keokee, Big Stone Gap, Appalachia, and Norton

quadrangles [quads]; ESRI, 2015). USGS topographic map contour lines are used to determine areas

of flat or depressed terrain where water is more likely to pool for sufficient duration that allows

development of the three required wetland parameters (i.e., hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and

wetland hydrology). As a general guideline, wetlands are more commonly found in flatter areas versus

steeper terrain and ridgelines.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Flood Hazard Layer (FEMA, 2020). The

FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer was used as a guide to indicate the potential presence of wetlands

within mapped floodplain areas. Aerial imagery (ESRI, 2015) was used to evaluate areas for vegetative

cover and the potential presence of wetlands. Image resolution varies depending on the location.

Higher resolution allows for more in depth analysis of vegetative cover and obscure landform features.

Frequently, historical images of the same area can be viewed in succession allowing for a review of the

consistency and/or changing conditions of a particular feature. However, aerial images lack color

infrared features, making identification of surface hydrology, and subsequently, wetland features

imprecise. For these reasons, aerial images are only used in conjunction with other available desktop

resources.

The USACE defines wetlands as areas that contain hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland

hydrology. This desktop analysis used existing available information to identify the areas that are likely to

contain hydric soils, hydrophytic vegetation, and wetland hydrology. A wetland is most likely to occur, as

identified from a desktop survey, in areas where multiple data sources indicate the potential for wetland

criteria. For example, a wetland is more likely to occur when an NWI map, soil survey, and aerial photograph

indicate the probable location of a wetland than when only one data source indicates the probability of a

wetland occurrence. It is noted that no field investigations to identify wetlands, as described in the 1987

Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987) or the Regional

Supplement (USACE, 2012), were performed.



2-11

Table 2 and Figures 3-1 – 3-2 identify potential wetlands within the Study Area. Potential wetland features

present within the existing ROW would likely be classified during a wetland delineation survey as palustrine

scrub-shrub (PSS) or emergent (PEM) due to maintenance within the ROW However, it is noted that the

distinction between PEM wetlands and PSS wetlands is difficult to ascertain using desktop resources.

Therefore, for the purposes of this evaluation, PSS and PEM wetlands have been classified together

(PSS/PEM).

Table 2. Potential Wetlands Located Within the Study Area

Wetland ID Route Name Cowardin

Class1

Estimated

Acreage

within

Study Area2

Figure 3

Page

Number

Hydrologic Connection3

W002 Dorchester-Arnold Pond/PUB 0.91 22 Connected outside of the

study area

W003 Dorchester-Arnold Pond/PUB 0.33

22 Connected outside of the

study area

W004 Dorchester-Arnold Pond/PUB 0.42 21, 22 Abutting stream

W005 Dorchester-Arnold Pond/PUB 0.21 21, 22 Abutting stream

W006 Dorchester-Arnold PFO 1.86 21 Abutting stream

W008 Dorchester-Arnold PEM/PSS 0.31 21 Abutting stream

W009 Dorchester-Arnold PEM/PSS 0.26 20 Connected outside of the

study area


W012 Dorchester-Arnold Pond/PUB 0.22 19 Connected outside of the

study area

W013 Dorchester-Arnold PEM/PSS 0.20 18 Adjacent to stream



W016 Dorchester-Arnold Pond/PUB 0.95 18 Adjacent to stream


W018 Dorchester-Arnold PEM/PSS 0.51 18 Abutting stream


W022 Dorchester-Arnold Pond/PUB 1.00 17 Abutting stream

W023 Dorchester-Arnold Pond/PUB 0.69 17 Abutting stream

W024 Dorchester-Arnold PEM/PSS 1.73 15, 16 Abutting stream

W026 Dorchester-Arnold PEM/PSS 0.18 15, 16 Abutting stream



2-12



Class1

Estimated

Acreage

within

Study Area2

Figure 3

Page

Number


W027 Dorchester-Arnold PFO 0.06 15, 16 Abutting stream


W028 Dorchester-Pocket

North PFO 0.09 16 Abutting stream


North PEM/PSS 0.79 16 Abutting stream


North PEM/PSS 0.58 15, 16 Adjacent to stream


North PEM/PSS 0.17 15, 16 Abutting stream


North PFO 0.47 15, 16 Abutting stream


North PFO 1.16 14, 15 Abutting stream




North Pond/PUB 0.11 14 Adjacent to stream




North PEM/PSS 0.25 14 Adjacent to stream


North Pond/PUB 0.03 14

Connected outside of the

study area




study area


North PEM/PSS 0.75 14


study area


North Pond/PUB 0.42 14 Adjacent to stream





2-13



Class1

Estimated

Acreage

within

Study Area2

Figure 3

Page

Number















study area












study area













2-14



Class1

Estimated

Acreage

within

Study Area2

Figure 3

Page

Number

















North Pond/PUB 0.92 6 Abutting stream








North PFO 0.69 6 Adjacent to stream










study area



2-15



Class1

Estimated

Acreage

within

Study Area2

Figure 3

Page

Number





study area










study area

W091

Dorchester-Pocket

North and

Harlan-Pocket North

PEM/PUB 0.06 3 Adjacent to stream

W092 Harlan-Pocket North PEM/PSS 0.17 3 Adjacent to stream


W094 Harlan-Pocket North PFO 0.94 3 Abutting stream


W097 Harlan-Pocket North PEM/PSS 0.70 2 Abutting stream

W098 Harlan-Pocket North PFO 0.64 2 Connected outside of the

study area

W099 Harlan-Pocket North PEM/PSS 0.10 2 Connected outside of the

study area


study area


study area


study area


study area


study area



2-16



Class1

Estimated

Acreage

within

Study Area2

Figure 3

Page

Number


W105 Harlan-Pocket North PEM/PSS 0.05 1, 2 Abutting stream

W106 Harlan-Pocket North Pond/PUB 0.03 1, 2 Abutting stream


W108 Harlan-Pocket North Pond/PUB 0.67 1 Abutting stream

W109 Harlan-Pocket North Pond/PUB 0.35 1 Abutting stream





W116 Harlan-Pocket North PFO 0.22 1 Abutting stream

1 Cowardin classification was determined from aerial photography and may not accurately represent current Cowardin classifications of the potential features identified

2 Acreage is estimated based off of desktop review and an accurate assessment of actual wetlands and impacts can only be determined by conducting a wetland delineation

based on the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, the Regional Supplement, and other USACE guidance documents.

3 The USACE will make the final determination on hydrologic connection between wetlands and other WOUS.

PEM = Palustrine emergent

PSS = Palustrine scrub-shrub

PFO = Palustrine forested

PUB = Palustrine unconsolidated bottom

Based on the desktop evaluation of the above-mentioned resources, jurisdictional wetlands (those that are

hydrologically connected to a WOUS) are likely present within the Study Area. An accurate assessment of

actual wetlands and impacts can only be determined by conducting a wetland delineation based on the

1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (Environmental Laboratory, 1987), the Regional

Supplement (USACE, 2012), and other USACE guidance documents.

Wetland impacts will be reduced to the greatest extent practicable during Project construction. It is

anticipated any wetland impacts that do occur will be temporary in nature and limited to temporary

equipment crossings. No permanent wetland impacts are expected for the Project.

E. Solid and Hazardous Waste

An Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) report was generated to search federal, state, and other

available databases to identify potentially contaminated sites within and/or near the Study Area, including,

but not limited to, petroleum sites, hazardous waste sites, and non-hazardous solid waste sites. The EDR

report is provided as Appendix A and summarized below.



2-17

Eight coal mines were identified in the U.S. Mines database within 500 feet of the Project centerline

and five of those mines were also listed in the Abandoned Mines database. No violations

associated with any of the eight mines were reported. Due to the lack of reported violations, it is

not anticipated that contamination in connection to the eight mines is present within the Study Area.

The Facility Index System identified a lumber facility within the Study Area in the Aerometric

Information Retrieval System (AIRS) Facility Subsystem database (site 3 on Focus Map 17 in the

EDR report [Appendix A]); AIRS is a repository for information related to airborne pollution. The

facility was also identified in the Enforcement and Compliance History Online database. The closest

structure proposed for repair or replacement is approximately 630 feet southwest of the facility

location. No violations were reported by either database. Due to the nature of the database listings

and lack of reported violations, no contaminated media from the lumber facility is expected in the

Study Area.

A facility with two inactive diesel underground storage tanks (USTs) was identified within the Study

Area in the UST database (site 2 on Focus Map 10 in the EDR report [Appendix A]). The closest

structure proposed for repair or replacement is approximately 4,830 feet northwest of the facility

location. No releases in connection with the USTs were reported. Due to the lack of violations

reported and distance from Project activities, no contamination in relation to this facility is

anticipated in the Study Area.

The presence of contamination from other facilities identified in the EDR report is unlikely due to the

distance of the facilities from the Study Area. Due to regulatory status of facilities, length of time since

reported releases, distance and downgradient position of facilities relative to Project activities, and nature

of database listings, it is not anticipated that contamination associated with the facilities identified in the

EDR report will be encountered during Project construction.

F. Natural Heritage, Threatened and Endangered Species

Publicly available databases were reviewed to identify federally and state listed threatened, endangered,

and protected or sensitive species, critical habitat, and other areas or species of ecological significance and

importance that have potential to occur within the vicinity of the Study Area.

Federally-Protected Species

A review of the USFWS Information, Planning and Conservation System (IPaC) was conducted to

determine the potential for federally listed threatened and/or endangered (protected) species in the Study

Area. An official species list was obtained from the USFWS on February 4, 2020. A total of 23 threatened

and/or endangered species were identified on the official species list. These species are incorporated into

the Species Impact Determinations table (Table 3) below. A copy of the official species list obtained from

the USFWS IPaC system is located in Appendix B.

State-Protected Species

An environmental review request was submitted on February 6, 2020, to the Virginia Department of

Conservation and Recreation (DCR)-Division of Natural Heritage (DNH) to determine the potential for

impacts to state-listed threatened and endangered species and other natural heritage resources resulting

from the proposed Project. A response was received from the Virginia DCR-DNH on February 21, 2020;



2-18

the response is provided in Appendix C and summarized below. The Virginia DCR-DNH provides natural

heritage data by USGS 7.5 Minute topographic map quad. As shown on Figures 1-1 – 1-9, the Harlan-

Pocket North transmission line is located within the Pennington Gap and Evarts quads; the Dorchester-

Pocket North transmission line is located within the Pennington Gap, Keowee, Big Stone Gap, Appalachia,

and Norton quads; and the Dorchester-Arnold transmission line is located within the Norton and Appalachia

quads.

Big Stone Gap, Evarts, and Norton Quads

The Virginia DCR-DNH’s environmental review yielded no documentation of natural heritage resources

within the Study Area or within a 100-foot buffer around the Study Area in the Big Stone Gap, Evarts, and

Norton quads. However, Virginia DCR predictive modeling for the Northern Long-eared Bat (Myotis

septentrionalis), Little Brown Bat (Myotis lucifugus), and Tri-colored Bat (Perimyotis subflavus) identified

potential habitat for these resources within portions of the Study Area along the Dorchester-Pocket North

and Dorchester-Arnold transmissions lines within the Norton quadrangle; these three species are included

in Table 3 below.

Keokee and Pennington Gap Quads

The Meadow Fork-Reeds Creek Stream Conservation Unit (SCU) is located adjacent to portions of the

Study Area along the Harlan-Pocket North and Dorchester-Pocket North transmission lines (refer to

Appendix C for a description of SCUs). The Virginia DCR-DNH identified two natural heritage resources

associated with this SCU, the Blackside Dace (Chrosomus cumberlandensis) and the Spiny Scale Crayfish

(Cambarus jezerinaci); however, only the Blackside Dace has legal status and is included in Table 3 below.

In addition, Reeds Creek, which is located within a portion of the Study Area along the Dorchester-Pocket

North transmission line, has been designated by the Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries

(VDGIF) as a Threatened and Endangered Species Water for the Blackside Dace. The Meadow Fork-

Reeds Creek SCU, Blackside Dace, and Spiny Scale Crayfish are discussed in detail in Appendix C.

The Cox Creek-North Fork Powell River SCU is within portions of the Study Area along the Dorchester-

Pocket North transmission line in the Keokee quad. The Virginia DCR-DNH identified one natural heritage

resource associated with this SCU, the Blackside Dace. The Cox Creek-North Fork Powell River SCU and

Blackside Dace are discussed in detail in Appendix C.

To minimize adverse impacts to these aquatic ecosystems, the Virginia DCR recommended implementation

of and adherence to applicable state and local erosion and sediment control/stormwater management laws

and regulations. Due to the legal status of the Blackside Dace, the Virginia DCR also recommended

coordination with the USFWS and VDGIF.

Appalachia Quad

The Roaring Branch-Little Stone Mountain Conservation Site is within a portion of the Study Area along the

Dorchester-Pocket North transmission line (refer to Appendix C for a description of Conservation Sites).

The Virginia DCR-DNH identified one natural heritage resource of concern associated with the

Conservation Site, the Southern Appalachian Montane Mixed Oak Forest. The Southern Appalachian

Montane Mixed Oak Forest (Northern Red Oak-Chestnut Oak Submesic Type) abuts portions of the Study

Area along the Dorchester-Pocket North transmission line west of Big Stone Gap. To avoid impacts to the

Southern Appalachian Montane Mixed Oak Forest, the Virginia DCR recommended avoiding equipment



2-19

staging outside of existing ROW. The Roaring Branch-Little Stone Mountain Conservation Site and

Southern Appalachian Montane Mixed Oak Forest are discussed in detail in Appendix C.

The Mudlick Branch Conservation Site is located within a portion of the Study Area along the Dorchester-

Pocket North transmission line. The Virginia DCR-DNH identified four natural heritage resources of concern

associated with the Mudlick Branch Conservation Site, the Northern Long-eared Bat, Little Brown Bat, Tri-

colored Bat, and Eastern Small-footed Myotis (Myotis leibii); however; only the Northern Long-eared Bat,

Little Brown Bat, and Tri-colored Bat have legal status and are included in Table 3 below. Due to the legal

status of the Northern Long-eared Bat and the associated final 4(d) rule, if tree removal is proposed for the

Project, the Virginia DCR recommended coordination with the USFWS and the VDGIF to ensure

compliance with protected species legislation. Due to the legal status of the Little Brown Bat and Tri-colored

Bat, the Virginia DCR recommended coordination with the VDGIF to ensure compliance with the Virginia

Endangered Species Act. The Mudlick Branch Conservation Site, the Northern Long-eared Bat, Little Brown

Bat, Tri-colored Bat, and Eastern Small-footed Myotis are discussed in detail in Appendix C.

A request for VDGIF review has not been submitted as the VDGIF does not conduct pre-application

reviews due to staffing limitations. However, the VDGIF’s Virginia Fish and Wildlife Information Service

(VaFWIS) database was searched for state and federally threatened and endangered species known to

occur within a 3-mile radius of the Study Area. This review yielded 47 federally endangered (FE), state

endangered (SE), federally threatened (FT), state threatened (ST), and/or federally protected (FP) species

within the search radius. Only species identified from the 3-mile radius search that were also identified from

the IPaC official species list and/or the Virginia DCR-DNH project review were incorporated into Table 3. A

copy of the VaFWIS Search Report is contained in Appendix D.

Table 3. Species Impact Determinations

Common

Name Scientific Name Legal Status Source Species Impact Determination

Mammals

Gray Bat Myotis

grisescens

FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

This species is an inhabitant of caves and mines.

It is found mainly in large caves with substantial

streams. Nightly foraging for aquatic insects and

mayflies is mainly along the edges of rivers and

reservoirs, and roosts are generally located

close to these aquatic foraging areas. This

species may also forage in forest canopy along

river edges on occasion. They are basically a

colonial inhabitant of subterranean structures

and may not use forests to roost as do solitary

bats. They have not been found hibernating in

caves in Virginia. Only summer roosts have been

found. This Project will not impact hibernacula or



2-20


Common


roosting habitat of the Gray Bat and therefore is

not anticipated to adversely affect this species.

Indiana Bat Myotis sodalis FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

Indiana bats are found along wooded, or semi-

wooded areas along streams, and are

associated with cavernous limestone areas.

Rivers and streams are important for dispersal,

navigation, and feeding. Caves with high

humidity and waterbodies are favored. They are

also found in bridges, underpasses, buildings,

ditches, culverts, tree cavities, standing snags,

tunnels and shafts. Winter caves provide

uniformly cool damp conditions (4-8 degrees

Celsius and 66 percent relative humidity)

throughout the winter. This species spends its

summers either in caves or under loose bark of

dead trees along streams. The bats emerge at

night to feed on moths, mayflies, and other

insects in treetops and over streams. One

radioed individual foraged along edge habitat of

a mature hardwood-hemlock forest. The

shagbark hickory is a preferred summer roosting

tree because of its shaggy bark. Large white

oaks are also used for summer roosting. Bats

pick several trees in a general area and

designate one as a primary roost and the rest as

alternate roosts to use during weather changes

or other disruptive events. Tree clearing and/or

side trimming will occur as part of this Project;

however, all tree clearing and/or side trimming

will occur outside of time of year (TOYR)

restrictions for this species. The Project is not

anticipated to have an adverse impact on this

species.

Little Brown

Bat

Myotis lucifugis SE DCR-

DNH

This species will roost in caves, buildings, rocks

and trees, under bridges, in mines and in

tunnels. They hibernate mostly in caves, mine

shafts and abandoned tunnels. They may dwell

in man-made structures. This is one of the most



2-21


Common


abundant insectivorous bats in Virginia and are

found in all forested regions near water. ree

clearing and/or side trimming will occur as part of

this Project; however, all tree clearing and/or

side trimming will occur outside of time of year

(TOYR) restrictions for this species. The Project

is not anticipated to have an adverse impact on

this species.

Northern Long-

Eared Bat

Myotis

septentrionalis

FT/ST IPaC

VaFWIS

DCR-

DNH

This species inhabits forested regions, and will

forage mainly on hillsides and ridge forests

rather than riparian and floodplain forests. They

frequent areas under the forest canopy just

above shrub level. The males occur in caves in

the spring and summer, but the females shun

caves and roost under tree bark. Tree clearing

and /or side trimming will occur as part of this

Project; however, all tree clearing and/or side

trimming will occur outside of TOYR restrictions

for this species. The Project is not anticipated to

have an adverse impact on this species.

Tri-colored Bat Perimyotis

subflavus

SE DCR-

DNH

They are found in caves, trees, sometimes

buildings in both wooded and cleared areas.

Throughout their range, this species will

hibernate in caves. They roost in caves in the

winter and in caves, trees, cliffs and barns in the

summer months.

Fishes

Blackside

Dace

Chrosomus

cumberlandensis

FT/ST IPaC

VaFWIS

DCR-

DNH

This species inhabits small upland headwaters

and creeks that are approximately 2 to 5 meters

in width and where riffle and pool areas occur

equally. Preferred substrates include sand,

sandstone, and shale. It occurs in pools with

cover such as bedrock, rubble, undercut banks,

or brush. Generally, this species is associated

with lush riparian vegetation, a canopy cover of

approximately more than 70 percent, cool water,

and unsilted conditions. This species can



2-22


Common


apparently recolonize areas when water quality

or habitat conditions become more favorable,

and if suitable dispersal corridors occur. In-water

work will be limited to the extent practicable for

this Project and will consist of limited temporary

stream crossings. Additionally, any stream

crossing would occur within an existing

maintained ROW that lacks canopy cover

greater than 70 percent. This Project is not

anticipated to have an adverse effect on any fish

species.

Slender Chub Erimystax cahni FT/ST IPaC

VaFWIS

This species is restricted to moderate to large

(30-125-meter-width), warm water streams with

substrates of fine gravel, occasionally with a

mixture of coarse sand and medium and large

gravel, swept clean by moderate to swift

currents. They use open, shallow flats and

shoals of warm, usually clear, moderate-gradient

large streams and rivers, 30-125 meters wide.

Frequently the chub is observed as shallow as

0.3 meter, but rarely 0.1 meter. They

occasionally occupy slow runs but have not been

found in backwaters or pools. A specific habitat

requirement appears to be the presence of major

areas (greater than 25 square meters) of clean,

small (pea size) to medium gravel. Its winter

habitat is thought to be pools. In-water work will

be limited to the extent practical for this Project

and will consist of limited temporary stream

crossings. Additionally, large streams preferred

by this species are not located within the Study

Area. This Project is not anticipated to have an

adverse effect on any fish species.

Yellowfin

Madtom

Noturus

flavipinnis

FT/ST IPaC

VaFWIS

Habitat substrate consists of gravel and rubble,

with some boulders and bedrock and small areas

of fine sand present, but\ no shifting sand. The

habitat consists of generally short, swift riffles

and moderate to moderately long, shallow pools.



2-23


Common


This species occurs in medium to large

unpolluted streams with a moderate to gentle

gradient. In-water work will be limited to the

extent practical for this project and will consist of

limited temporary stream crossings. This

Project is not anticipated to have an adverse

effect on any fish species.

Clams

Appalachian

Monkeyface

(pearlymussel)

Theliderma

sparsa

FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

This species is often in clean fast-flowing water

in areas that contain relatively firm rubble, gravel

and sand substrates, swept free of silt. They are

usually found buried in the substrate in shallow

riffle and shoal areas. In-water work will be

limited to the extent practicable for this Project


crossings. This Project is not anticipated to have

an adverse effect on this species.

Birdwing

Mussel

Lemiox rimosus FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

This mussel is most often found in clean, fast-

flowing water in substrates that contain relatively

firm rubble, gravel and sand substrates that are

swept free of siltation. They are usually buried in

the substrate in shallow riffle and shoal areas.

They have been found alive in 6-7 feet of water

in relatively silt-free rubble, gravel and sand

substrates, indicating that depth need not be a

limiting factor. In-water work will be limited to the

extent practicable for this Project and will consist

of limited temporary stream crossings. The


effect on this species.

Cracking

Pearlymussel

Hemistena lata FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

The cracking pearlymussel is a lotic, riffle-

dwelling species, occurring at fords and shoals

with sand and gravel substrata and moderate

current velocities. It can burrow deeply in the

substratum because of an unusually long foot.

They are found in cobble, gravel, sand, and

occasionally mud substrates in medium to large



2-24


Common


rivers. In-water work will be limited to the extent

practicable for this Project and will consist of

limited temporary stream crossings. The Project

is not anticipated to have an adverse effect on

this species.

Cumberland

Monkeyface

(pearlymussel)

Theliderma

intermedia

FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

The Cumberland monkeyface is a lotic, fast-

water species, usually occurring in riffles and

runs of small to mid-sized rivers. It has never

been found in small streams or impounded

portions of rivers. This species is typically well-

burrowed in stable substrata and occupies the

same microhabitats as the other endangered

mussel species in the Powell River in Lee

County. They are found in clean water with

relatively firm rubble, gravel and sand substrates

swept free from siltation. In-water work will be



crossings. The Project is not anticipated to have


Cumberlandian

Combshell

Epioblasma

brevidens

FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

This species is usually found in fast-flowing,

clean water in substrates swept free from

siltation. They are buried in the substrate in

shallow riffle and shoal areas. It is characteristic

of medium-sized stream faunas, and is not

associated with small stream and creek habitats.

In-water work will be limited to the extent




this species.

Dromedary

Pearlymussel

Dromus dromas FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

The dromedary pearlymussel is a lotic, riffle-

dwelling species that usually inhabits shoals and

fords with moderate current velocities. However,

this species does occur in deeper, slow-flowing

waters in Tennessee. It is typically well-burrowed

in silt-free, stable substrata of mixed particle

sizes ranging from sand to cobble. In-water work



2-25


Common


will be limited to the extent practicable for this

Project and will consist of limited temporary

stream crossings. The Project is not anticipated

to have an adverse effect on this species.

Fanshell Cyprogenia

stegaria

FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

This species is found in medium to large rivers,

mainly in deep water with a gravel substrate and

moderate flow. In-water work will be limited to

the extent practicable for this Project and will

consist of limited temporary stream crossings.

The Project is not anticipated to have an adverse


Finerayed

Pigtoe

Fusconaia

cuneolus

FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

This is a riffle species that is found in ford and

shoal areas in free-flowing streams of moderate

gradient. They were collected in the Clinch River

at a depth of three feet in the sandy and rocky

substrate. It was also found in the sandy-muddy

bottom of a small creek. In-water work will be



crossings. The Project is not anticipated to have


Fluted

Kidneyshell

Ptychobranchus

subtentus

FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

This species is found imbedded in fine

sediments, usually fine mud, in relatively quiet

water in beds of vegetation or in protective

cracks between boulders. They are very close to,

but not in, rapids. In-water work will be limited to

the extent practicable for this Project and will




Littlewing

Pearlymussel

Pegias fabula FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

The little-wing pearlymussel is a lotic, riffle-

dwelling species that is usually found in the

headwaters of high gradient tributary streams.

Specimens have been found in the transition

zone between pools and riffles; buried under

large, flat rocks; and in gravel substrata adjacent

to water willow beds. In-water work will be limited



2-26


Common


to the extent practicable for this Project and will




Oyster Mussel Epioblasma

capsaeformis

FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

This species is found imbedded in fine sediments

usually fine mud, in relatively quiet water in beds

of vegetation or in protective cracks between

boulders very close to but not in rapids. In-water





Purple Bean Villosa

perpurpurea

FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

This species is usually found in fast-flowing,

clean water in substrates that contain relatively

firm rubble, gravel and sand substrates swept

free from siltation. They are buried in the

substrate in shallow riffle and shoal areas. In-

water work will be limited to the extent




this species.

Rough

Rabbitsfoot

Theliderma

cylindrica

FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

This species has been reported in swift streams

with gravel bottoms and moderate currents, and

in swift clear streams having sandy gravel bars.





this species.

Sheepnose

Mussel

Plethobasus

cyphyus

FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

This is a large river species that is absent from

small tributary streams and is of peripheral

occurrence in Virginia. Although generally

associated with sand-gravel substrate of riffles

and shoals in Virginia, it also occurs in mud-sand

habitat in deeper areas (greater than 2 meters).

They are usually very close to, but not in, rapids.



2-27


Common






this species.

Shiny Pigtoe Fusconaia cor FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

This is a riffle species that is found along fords

and shoals of clear, moderate to fast flowing

streams and rivers with stable substrate. It is

usually well buried in the substrate during most

of the year, although readily visible in the early

summer. In-water work will be limited to the

extent practicable for this Project and will consist

of limited temporary stream crossings. The



Slabside

Pearlymussel

Pleuronaia

dolabelloides

FE/SE IPaC

VaFWIS

The slabside pearlymussel resides in the shoal

and riffle habitats of intermediate-sized streams

characterized by moderate to fast-flowing water

and a clean, heterogeneous substrate. In-water





The Center for Conservation Biology Eagle Nest Locator was reviewed to determine if active bald eagle

nests are located in the vicinity of the project area. The closest bald eagle nest is approximately 4.75 miles

to the southeast of the Study Area.

Due to ground disturbance being limited to areas around structures proposed for replacement and within

existing ROW, restoration of disturbed areas to pre-construction contours, limited tree clearing, and

avoidance of large stream crossings, the Project is not expected to adversely affect federally or state-

protected species or other natural heritage resources. Additionally, KU-ODP will follow the Virginia DCR’s

recommendations for avoiding and minimizing impacts to natural heritage resources. Coordination with the

USFWS, VDGIF, and the Virginia DCR will be completed to determine what, if any, species-specific surveys

are required for the Project. KU-ODP will consult with these agencies to determine specific techniques to

minimize impacts on these species.



2-28

G. Erosion and Sediment Control

KU-ODP's Annual Standards and Specifications: Erosion and Sediment Control; Stormwater Management

is submitted to the DEQ annually for review. The approved Annual Standards and Specifications document

is given to the KU-ODP's construction contractors and requires erosion and sediment control measures to

be in place before construction begins and specifies the requirements for rehabilitation of disturbed areas.

Erosion and sediment control measures will be maintained and temporary stabilization for all soil-disturbing

activities will be used until disturbed areas have been restored. Upon completion of the Project, all

temporarily disturbed areas will be restored.

H. Archaeological, Historic, Scenic, Cultural, or Architectural

Resources

Arcadis conducted an architectural and historic resources desktop review for the pre-application analysis

of the Project per the Virginia Department of Historic Resources’ (VDHR’s) Guidelines for Assessing

Impacts of Proposed Electric Transmission Line and Associated Facilities on Historic Resources in the

Commonwealth of Virginia. This review included previously recorded VDHR resources within the Study

Area.

The Area of Potential Effect (APE) for the pre-application analysis of the Project is defined in consultation

with the VDHR as a tiered buffer extending prescribed distances from the Project centerline. The tiered

buffer APE utilizes a 1.5-mile radial buffer to identify National Historic Landmarks (NHLs); a 1.0-mile radial

buffer to identify NHLs, National Register of Historic Places (NRHP)-listed properties, battlefields, and

historic landscapes; and a 0.5-mile radial buffer for all of the previously categorized resources, as well as

formally determined NRHP-eligible properties. Previously recorded archaeological sites located within the

Study Area are also identified.

The desktop survey of the tiered buffer APE for the Harlan-Pocket North transmission line identified no

NRHP-listed or eligible properties, battlefields, historic landscapes, or NHLs within the appropriate buffer

tiers. Additionally, no previously identified archaeological sites are located within the Study Area.

The desktop survey identified no NRHP-listed or eligible properties, battlefields, historic landscapes, or

NHLs within the 0.5-mile buffer APE of the proposed replacement structures of the Dorchester-Pocket

transmission line; however, three NRHP-listed properties were identified within the 1.0-mile buffer of

proposed replacement structures: Country Cabin (097-0059), the Keokee Coal & Coke Company Store

(052-0066) and Appalachia Commercial Historic District (164-5003). The desktop survey identified no NHLs

within the 1.5-mile buffer. Additionally, no previously identified archaeological sites are located within the

Study Area.

Within the 0.5-mile buffer APE of the replacement structures of the Dorchester-Arnold transmission line,

one NRHP-listed resource, the Stonega Historic District (097-0042), was identified. The Stonega Historic

District is located within the Study Area. The desktop survey identified no NRHP-listed resources or NHLs

within the 1.0-mile or 1.5-mile buffers. Additionally, no previously identified archaeological sites are located

within the Study Area. See Appendix E for the detailed results of the Architectural and Historical Resources

Pre-Application Analysis.



2-29

Due to the increase in height of many of the structures being replaced, a Viewshed Analysis was conducted

(see Appendix E). KU-ODP will submit the pre-application analysis to the VDHR and will continue

coordination with that agency. VDHR’s correspondence will be provided when available.

I. Chesapeake Bay Reservation Areas

Construction, installation, operation, and maintenance of electric transmission lines are conditionally

exempt from the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act as stated in the exemption for public utilities, railroads,

public roads, and facilities in 9 VAC 25-830-150. The Project is not located within any localities designated

as part of Tidewater Virginia under the Chesapeake Bay Preservation Act.

J. Wildlife Resources

Due to ground disturbance being limited to areas around structures proposed for replacement and within

existing ROW, restoration of disturbed areas to pre-construction contours, limited tree clearing, and

avoidance of large stream crossings, the Project is not expected to adversely affect federally or state-

protected species or other wildlife. KU-ODP will coordinate with the appropriate regulatory agencies, as

needed, for concurrence that the Project is not likely to adversely affect federally or state-protected species.

If deemed necessary through coordination with regulatory agencies, KU-ODP will perform surveys to

determine if species are present and plan accordingly to avoid and minimize impacts on the species to the

extent practicable.

K. Recreation, Agriculture, and Forest Resources

Approximately 570 acres of forest and approximately 27 acres of farmland are present within the Study

Area. No Agricultural or Forestal Districts are crossed by the Project (Virginia Department of Forestry,

2016).

According to communications with the LENOWISCO Planning District (which serves the Counties of Lee,

Wise, and Scott and the City of Norton) on February 6, 2020, the county and municipal governments of Lee

and Wise County do not designate important farmlands; the LENOWISCO Planning District recognizes

important farmland designations determined by the NRCS. According to NRCS data, approximately 54

acres of Prime Farmland and approximately 43 acres of Farmland of Statewide Importance are located

within the Study Area (NRCS, 2020). However, only approximately 12 acres of Prime Farmland and

approximately 15 acres of Farmland of Statewide Importance are currently being used as farmland.

Disturbance to important farmland from Project activities will only be temporary and no important farmlands

will be precluded from future potential agricultural use. Lands currently used for agricultural purposes that

are disturbed by Project activities will be restored to pre-construction contours and in coordination with

landowners.

According to the Virginia DCR’s Conservation Lands Database, portions of the Study Area around the

Dorchester-Pocket North Transmission Line are within the George Washington and Jefferson National

Forest, but no other managed conservation lands, including conservation easements, federal lands, state

lands, local lands, and non-profit lands, are present (Virginia DCR, 2020a). Approximately 728 acres of the

George Washington and Jefferson National Forest is within the Study Area. Other than the George

Washington and Jefferson National Forest, no protected lands were identified in the Protected Areas



2-30

Database of the United States that are crossed by the Study Area (USGS, 2020). Coordination with the

U.S. Forest Service (USFS) for work within the George Washington and Jefferson National Forest will be

completed concurrently with this DEQ Supplement filing. It is anticipated that work associated with the

structure replacements will occur in areas of the ROW covered under existing Special Use Authorizations.

A USFS environmental review may be required for some access roads that are outside areas covered

under existing Special Use Authorizations. No Project activities will occur within the George Washington or

Jefferson National Forest prior to receipt of all required permits and approvals from the USFS. No Virginia

Natural Area Preserves or properties in the Virginia Registry of Natural Areas are crossed by the Study

Area (Virginia DCR, 2020c; Appendix C).

Virginia Scenic Byways are crossed by the Project at seven locations, according to the Virginia DCR

(2020b). Stretches of both the Cumberland to Pennington Trail (locally managed trail) and Coal Heritage

Trail (driving tour) follow Virginia Scenic Byways (Virginia DCR, 2020b). As shown on Figures 2-1 – 2-9,

the Coal Heritage Trail is crossed by the Study Area at six locations and the Cumberland to Pennington

Trail is crossed at two locations. No National Scenic Byways are crossed by the Study Area (Federal

Highway Administration, 2020). Impacts to these resources are not anticipated due to the nature of the

Project, and because ground disturbance will occur within the existing ROW at locations where structures

are currently located.

The Appalachia Trail (federally managed trail) within the George Washington and Jefferson National Forest

is located within the Study Area, but no National Natural Landmarks, National Trails, state scenic rivers,

National Wild and Scenic Rivers, National Monuments, National Parks, National Recreation Areas, state

parks, regional parks, public fishing lakes, or other designated scenic or recreational areas are located

within the Study Area (National Park Service, 2016 and 2018; National Wild and Scenic Rivers System,

2020; Virginia Department of Transportation, 2019; Virginia DCR, 2020b). Impacts to this resource is not

anticipated due to the nature of the Project, and because ground disturbance will occur within the existing

ROW at locations where structures are currently located.

Due to the limited presence of recreation, agriculture, and forest resources within the Study Area; ground

disturbance being limited to areas around structures proposed for replacement and within existing ROW,

restoration of disturbed areas to pre-construction contours, and limited tree clearing, impacts on recreation,

agriculture, and forest resources are expected to be minor.

L. Use of Pesticides and Herbicides

KU-ODP maintains transmission line ROW with aerial and ground applications, using selective herbicides

to control woody vegetation while encouraging the growth of established grasses, ferns and herbaceous

plant cover. The resulting ROW has a more diverse plant community that encourages and enhances

habitats for pollinators and wildlife. Only herbicides approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

will be applied.

M. Geology and Mineral Resources

The portions of the Study Area around the Dorchester-Arnold Transmission Line and norther

Date post:	09-Jul-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	4 times
Download:	0 times

DORCHESTER-ARNOLD-POCKET NORTH-HARLAN ......DORCHESTER-ARNOLD-POCKET NORTH-HARLAN 161KV PROJECT ii...

Documents