+ All Categories
Home > Documents > DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Date post: 23-Jan-2018
Category:
Upload: dillon-oconnor
View: 45 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
38
Daniel Paul Chairs Senior Design Project ME 450 Adrien Raucoules Andrew (Tim) Northcutt Michael Massey Dillon O’Connor December 12, 2014 1
Transcript
Page 1: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Daniel Paul Chairs

Senior Design ProjectME 450

Adrien Raucoules

Andrew (Tim) Northcutt

Michael Massey

Dillon O’Connor

December 12, 2014

1

Page 2: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

• Stacking chairs are the chair of choice for most high volume public settings

• Hotels

• Restaurants

• Convention centers

• Corporate Offices

• Dependable construction

• Extensive customization options

• Stack for convenient storage

Introduction to Stacking Chairs

2

Page 3: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

• Most of the industry has moved production overseas

• Many aspects of the production are becoming more modernized

• Modernization has allowed some of the work to return to the United States

• However, a critical aspect of production has resisted modernization

• Chair back assembly has not experienced substantial improvement since 1953

Production of Stacking Chairs

3

Page 4: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

• Most chair backs are made with a “sandwich” construction, where separate front

and back pieces are upholstered and attached to one another

• Requires a skilled laborer to perform this task manually

• Tremendous range of customization options for chair back shape, material,

cushion, and upholstery

• Growing number of styles and combinations of chair backs as customers

demand more and more

• Each chair back is a significant investment of time

The Problem

4

Page 5: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Sandwich Construction

Wood Panels without Upholstery Wood Panels with Upholstery5

Page 6: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

• Clean and professional appearance

• No mounting hardware is visible to the user

• Staples are safely contained between the two pieces

• Most of the seam between the two pieces is hidden

within the frame of the chair

• Upholstery appears seamless

Finished Sandwich Chair Back

6

Page 7: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Functions and Requirements• Not compromising the rigidity of the chair itself

• Decrease the time of assembly

• Increase production of as many chair styles as possible from the 2000 series

tubular steel frame chairs (with wood backs) from 12 per hour to 13~15 per

hour

• There are currently 31 total frame styles in this series

• Increase production of as many chair styles as possible from the 2000 series

aluminum frame chairs (from China) from 5 per hour to 6~8 per hour

• There are currently 25 total frame styles in this series

• As many back styles as possible with these frames

• Does not have to work for every design 7

Page 8: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Economizing Rigidity

• The more points of connection to the frame means better rigidity

• More points of connection means more parts and time spent making the

connection

• Stronger materials and/or a greater amount of material used in mounting hardware

(nuts, bolts, clips, fasteners, etc.) factors into rigidity

• Stronger materials or a greater amount of material comes at a higher cost

• Find a balance between time and cost of mounting hardware and rigidity of the

chair back

8

Page 9: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Brainstorming

• Injection molding

• Clip mounting tool

• Uniform hole pattern

• Grid pattern

• Asterisk pattern

• Clip modification

• Extended clips

• Universal sheet with Anti-Spin Receiver (ASR)9

Page 10: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Dead on Arrival

• We thought some injection molded designs would be ideal for mass production

• Molds are very expensive to design, and there are too many different backs that

would need separate molds

• Production of individual styles are not large enough to alleviate the initial

expense

• We thought a clip mounting gun or lever based machine would help save time

applying clips to chair frames

• Design of such equipment would be difficult

• The amount of time potentially saved here was deemed trivial

10

Page 11: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Dead on Arrival(Continued)

Lever Based Clip Application Machine Injection Molded Parts

11

Page 12: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Uniform Hole Pattern - Grid

• A sheet of material with a grid pattern of holes that could be mass produced

• Almost any chair back shape could be cut out and the holes would already be in

place for mounting to corresponding chair frames

• Excessive hole count would compromise rigidity

• Intended for injection molding where holes are made as part of

the mold

• Wood requires additional time and expense of

CNC machining each hole

• Unused holes equate to wasted machine time12

Page 13: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Uniform Hole Pattern - Asterisk• A sheet of material with an asterisk shaped pattern of holes that could be mass

produced

• Work similarly to the grid hole pattern but with less holes and greater material

thickness around holes to avoid a loss in rigidity

• Intended for injection molding where holes are made as part of the mold

• Wood requires additional time and expense of CNC machining

each hole

• Unused holes equate to wasted machine time

• Thickness variation around the hole pattern is not feasible

• Possible companion to an extended clip design13

Page 14: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Extended Mounting Clip

• A longer clip with an assortment of holes to facilitate connection to chair back

faces regardless of frame geometry

• Increased size of clip improves rigidity of chair back

• Requires more material (at the thickness of current clips) to make and thus is

marginally more expensive

• Not substantial enough an improvement in production

time to validate the cost

14

Page 15: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Anti-Spin Receiver (ASR)

• Mr. Barile expressed concern with current fasteners that spin while mounting chair

backs

• Hinders tightening of bolts

• Can snag loose strands of upholstery

• Suggested a plastic receiver in an oblong shape to prevent spinning

• Provided a preliminary prototype for reference

• We dubbed this design the Anti-Spin Receiver (ASR)

• Compatible with barbs that help in the upholstery process as well as threaded bolts

• Includes a slot for variable adjustments15

Page 16: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Anti-Spin

Receiver

(ASR)(Continued)

16

Page 17: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Uniform Hole Pattern - ASR

• A sheet of material with a standard pattern of holes that could be mass produced

and work for a variety of chair back styles is still a goal

• However, the hole pattern can accommodate the ASR

• Must work with wood

• Compatibility with injection molding for future endeavors is desirable

• Must have a lip at outermost perimeter of chair back for upholstery process

17

Page 18: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Idea Cost Ease of

Manufacturing

Rigidity Efficiency

(Time)

Total

Grid Hole Pattern 2 3 3 7 15

Asterisk Hole Pattern 3 3 5 7 18

Extended Clips 3 7 7 5 22

ASR Hole Pattern 7 8 5 7 27

Scored 1 (poor) through 10 (great)

5 represents no change from current methods

Concept Selection

18

Page 19: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Narrowing the Field• Variety is an understatement about possible chair styles

• Daniel Paul Chairs offers an immense variety of

stacking chair styles with very different chair backs.

However, some chair back styles work for multiple

frames

• The chair backs shown in models 2125-RFP-RGG,

2165-HH, 2155-HH, and 2115-HH are used in 21 of

31 steel frames and 13 of 25 aluminum frames

• Model 1900-HH has a simple chair back that can be

used for future steel and aluminum chair styles 19

Page 20: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Rectangular

• Demonstrated in frame 2125-RFP-RGG

• We call this chair back style the “rectangular”

chair back

• Named due to its basic four sided shape

20

Page 21: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Taper

• Demonstrated in frame 2165-HH

• We call this chair back style the “taper” chair

back

• Named due to its basic four sided shape with

a mild taper along its height

21

Page 22: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Oval

• Demonstrated in frame 2155-HH

• We call this chair back style the “oval” chair

back

• Named due to its basic shape

22

Page 23: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Ghost

• Demonstrated in frame 1900-HH

• We call this chair back style the “ghost” chair

back

• Named due to its shape, which we felt

resembled a traditional ghost

23

Page 24: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Lady

• Demonstrated in frame 2115-HH

• We call this chair back style the “lady” chair

back

• Named due to its elegant shape

24

Page 25: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Proposed Design

• Works for rectangular, taper, oval, and ghost chair back shapes

• We were not able to factor in the lady chair back shape

• When crafting from wood, holes can be made using standard drill bits that are

drilled in and dragged along in a straight line for 1/2 in

• 3/8 in through for body of clip

• 1/2 in to recess for lip to lie flush into the chair back

• Ideal with injection molding

• Outermost lip for each shape is discretely included in the structural webbing

• Requires one mold to be made

• Some extraneous material will be wasted25

Page 26: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Proposed ASR

3D Model of ASR Drawing of ASR26

Page 27: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Proposed ASR Clip

3D Model of ASR Clip Drawing of ASR Clip

27

Page 28: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Proposed Uniform Sheet

28

Page 29: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Analysis of Proto-PrototypeEngineering analysis was done using the following

setup:

• Smallest area frame (oval)

• Using the primary chair back material as ABS

Plastic

• Assuming the ASR pieces are made of ABS plastic

and the ASR clips and chair frame are made of

extruded aluminum (Aluminum 6061)

• Thickness of frame walls is 1/16 in

• The max pressure supported by the back frame is

0.68 psi which equates to a 150 lb force over the

220 in² surface area Oval Chair Back

29

Page 30: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Analysis of Proto-Prototype(continued)

Results:

• Our analysis concludes that with proper spacing of the

ASR and ASR clips, the majority of the force is

distributed directly to the frame

• The back panel has no noticeable effect on the

performance and is merely aesthetic

• The max stress was ~40 ksi, centered around the bend of

the frame where it would attach to the base

• The max displacement appeared at the top portion of the

frame at ~3.5 in

Stress Analysis

Deflection 30

Page 31: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Preparation for Moving Forward

• Our work will continue into ME 460 in the spring

• To facilitate keeping our work on target we have established a work task

breakdown

• We have a Gantt chart to keep up with our deadlines and task progression in one

convenient diagram

31

Page 32: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Work Breakdown

StructureGantt Chart

32

Page 33: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Delegation

of Tasks

• Procure Materials - Michael Massey

• Prepare Test Plan - Tim Northcutt

• Fabricate Parts - Dillon O’Connor

• Assemble System - Adrien Raucoules

• Test System - Tim Northcutt

• Final Presentation - Dillon O’Connor

• Write Report - Adrien Raucoules

33

Page 34: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Bill of Materials

Each chair would require the following:

• 1 frame of desired shape

• 1 wood/plastic chair front panel

• Cut to desired shape

• 1 wood/plastic chair back panel

• Cut to desired shape

• 6 ASR pieces

• 6 ASR clips

• 6 1/16 screws

• 6 barbed nails

34

Page 35: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Cost Estimates

35

Page 36: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Conclusion

• We are confident this idea can work

• However, we have our work cut out for next semester

• With the continued support from Daniel Paul Chairs and Mr. Barile we hope to

chip away at the stalemate in chair back construction

• We intend to try to verify the accuracy of our estimates about both the money

saved in materials and the time saved per chair

36

Page 37: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

References

• Slides 2, 6, 20-24: images courtesy of Daniel Paul Chairs

(www.danielpaulchairs.com)

• Slide 9, 19, 33: images courtesy of Google Images

• Slide 16: images courtesy of Pete Barile

• Slides 2, 3, 4, 35: information courtesy of Pete Barile

37

Page 38: DPC Final Presentation Rev 8

Questions?

38


Recommended