Date post: | 08-Aug-2015 |
Category: |
Business |
Upload: | business-growth-hub |
View: | 33 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Nanomedicine Lab | Centre for Tissue Injury and Repair | Institute of Inflammation and Repair | Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences | & National Graphene Institute | The University of Manchester | UK
@Nanomedicinelab www.nanomedicinelab.com
Cyrill Bussy, PhD
Graphene: Biomedical applications & safety profile
Nanomedicine Lab | Engineering & testing nano-carriers for diagnosis & therapy
Nano-carrier platforms
Aptamers
Antibodies
Nucleic Acids
Gadolinium
Indocyanine Green
Doxorubicin
Iron Oxide
Protein based Nano-objects
Fullerene Graphene
(Nano-hydrogels)
Artificially enveloped adenovirus
Liposomes
C nanotubes C nanohorns Gold nanoparticles Nanoswimmers
Graphene | A biomaterial ?
The idea: using graphene as a biomaterial
Solution 1 : using graphene as it is Solution 2 : modifying graphene to make it a biomaterial performing better
than existing ones
what is interesting about graphene (intrinsically) ?
Is graphene a good platform ?
Bitounis et al., Adv Mat, 2013
Graphene as Biomaterial | Current Landscape – Non Covalent Modifications
Graphene Graphene Oxide
Graphene as Biomaterial | Current Landscape – Covalent Modifications
Bitounis et al., Adv Mat, 2013
Long lasting blood circulation
Targeting
Imaging
Biocompatibility
Therapy
Capture
Graphene in Biomedicine | Current Landscape – Most mature bio-applications
The high chemical versatility of graphene, GO and rGO allows the conjugation of a vast variety of small molecules, macromolecules, and bioactive agents => promising biomedical opportunities
Expected (forecasted) applications
Servant et al.,Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett., 2014 | Bitounis et al., Adv Mat, 2013 | Shen et al, Theranostics 2012
Most Mature applications
Biosensing & Diagnostic Devices 64%
Toxicity 12%
Drug Delivery & Imaging carriers 8%
Antibacterial Agents 4% Tissue engineering & Scaffolds 4%
Photothermal Therapy 3%
Gene Delivery 2%
Biochemistry General 2%
Enzymatic Interations 1%
Drug & Gene Delivery 13%
Graphene in Biomedicine | Current Landscape (2013)
Orecchioni et al, Theranostics, 2015
Status of Graphene publications in the last 7 years for Cancer Fight.
D. Jasim, 1st transfer report, 2014
73%
32%
10%
31% 27%
• Which graphene materials to use?
• How is the interaction with cells ?
• What happens with graphene in the body ?
• Limitations: Toxicity - Biodegradation - Biopersistence?
• Use specific intrinsic properties (conductivity, optical, …) to identify uniqueness of graphene in biomedical application
Novoselov, K. et al., Nature, 2012
Graphene in Biomedicine | the Roadmap View
Kostarelos, K. and Novoselov K., Nat Nanotechnologies, 2014
Kostarelos, K. and Novoselov K., Science, 2014
What do we need to know/study to transform hope into real opportunities ?
Understand your material | Specific Physicochemical Features / Proper name
Bussy et al., Acc Chem Res, 2013 Bianco et al, Editorial of Carbon, 2013
It is essential to know and name properly the materials used to prevent confusion, misunderstanding, and generalisation
Ali-Boucetta et al., Adv Health Mat, 2013 + Lozano et al., in preparation
Modified Hummers’ Method for Biologically-relevant GO prepared under endotoxin free conditions
K. Chen et al, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2015,3, 2441-2453
Understand your material | Engineer the Required Materials
Graphene
Graphene Oxide
In ionic (physiological) fluids [e.g. Graphene Oxide ]
Understand your material | Characterisation/Behaviour in Relevant Fluids
The theory The Reality
In water In culture medium In saline solution
Smal
l La
rge
Understand your material | Characterisation/Behaviour in Relevant Fluids
Graphene cell biology | Colloidal Suspension vs Substrate
Bussy et al., Acc Chem Res, 2013
Colloidal suspensions = developing tools for imaging, diagnosis and therapy in nanomedicine
Substrate = platform for cell growth, differentiation in regenerative medicine (and tissue engineering)
Shah, S. et al., Advanced Materials, 2014
Ph
ase
con
tras
t B
righ
t fi
eld
Naïve Exposed to small flakes
Graphene cell biology | Interactions of Cells with Colloidal GNM Suspension
2. UPTAKE
24hrs after exposure
Ph
ase
con
tras
t B
righ
t fi
eld
Naïve Exposed to small flakes Exposed to small flakes
Graphene cell biology | Interactions of Cells with Colloidal GNM Suspension
2. UPTAKE
30 days after exposure
Graphene Pharmacology | Biodistribution, Elimination and Accumulation
111InCl3
=
Jasim D et al., Chem Sci, 2015.
Radioactive marker
Required parameters: • Good dispersibility => GO • Small size (blood) => small GO • Able to carry tracer => functionalised
Metabolic Profile
Jasim D et al., Chem Sci, 2015.
1h
4
h
24
h
Lung
Liver
Kidney
Bladder
Spleen
Lung
Liver
Kidney
Bladder
Spleen
Lung
Liver
Kidney
Bladder
Spleen
SPECT/CT Imaging
111InCl3
=
Gamma Scintigraphy
0
2
4
6
8
10
DOTA-111In EDTA-111In GO-DOTA-111In
%ID
de
tect
ed
aft
er
24
hr
Urine
Feaces
GO – DOTA[111In] EDTA[111In] DOTA[111In]
* *
* *
Graphene Pharmacology | Biodistribution, elimination and accumulation
Consequences, long term fate ?
HYDROGELS
3D water swollen polymer network
Formed by chemical or physical cross-linking
Equilibrium swelling/shrinking behaviour
High water content and resemblance with natural tissues
Biocompatible
• Pre-programmed drug delivery systems – Multi-layered polymeric matrix: layer loaded with drug and a
‘spacer’ layer
– Release controlled by the degradation of the polymer matrix
• ‘Smart’ materials: – Glucose or enzyme responsive
– pH responsive
– Temperature sensitive
– Electro-sensitive
– Light sensitive
Graphene & drug delivery | Polymeric implants for pulsatile drug release
How to make them responsive to stimuli ?
MAA, MBAM, PPS
70°C, 20 hours
Electrical
stimulation
I)
II)
III)
14C-sucrose loading
into the gel matrix
Servant et al., Adv. Health. Mater., 2012
Servant et al., J. Mat. Chem., 2013
Graphene & drug delivery | Electro-responsive hydrogels for pulsatile drug release
The idea: using the electrical conductivity of C-NMs to release drug from a gel. First, using CNTs
Servant et al., Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2014
In situ polymerisation
Graphene & drug delivery | Electroresponsive hydrogels for pulsatile drug release
The idea: using the electrical conductivity of C-NMs to release drug from a gel, this time using graphene
Ball mill graphene
• Graphene gels outperform MWNT gel hybrid in vivo: higher amounts of 14C-sucrose are released
• Reproducibility between cycles implying less damage upon electrical stimulation
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 50 100 150
% 1
4C
-su
cro
se r
elea
sed
in
vit
ro
Time (min)
graphene hybrid (0.2 mg/ml)
MWNT hybrid (0.2mg/ml)
Blank gel
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0 50 100 150 200 250
14C
-su
cro
se r
elea
se
in b
loo
d (
%)
Time (min)
MWNT 0.2 mg/ml
Blank gel
graphene 0.2 mg/ml
Graphene & drug delivery | Electroresponsive hydrogels for pulsatile drug release
Servant et al., Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2014
Graphene
Nanotubes
Blank gel
Graphene
Nanotubes
Blank gel
Graphene-based electro-responsive hydrogels perform (Release Drugs) better
Blank gel Graphene gel MWNT gel
Graphene & drug delivery | Electroresponsive hydrogels for pulsatile drug release
Servant et al., Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2014
Graphene-based electro-responsive hydrogels are SAFER
• Gels were implanted subcutaneously and electrically stimulated for 5 mins
• Significant inflammation for MWNT hybrid gels due to gel heating during stimulation
• under normal conditions, GO are non-toxic materials
• under irradiation (light), materials starts to produce oxidative stress related products that induce cell death
The idea: using the intrinsic optical (photothermal) properties of graphene related materials to induce toxicity
Graphene & therapy | Therapies based on induced toxicity
Li et al, Int J Nanomedicine, 2015
Wu et al, ACS nano, 2015
Cancer cells
Bacteria
The idea: using both the chemical functionalization potential (to attract and collect) and the optical absorption (photothermal) properties to kill bacteria
Bussy et al., Acc Chem Res, 2013
Graphene safety profile | Potential Limitations (environmental health)
Bussy et al., Acc Chem Res, 2013
Graphene safety profile | Analogy with Carbon Nanotubes (environmental health)?
Diaphragm tissue Inflammatory response
Evaluation of:
Intra-peritoneal injection
(50 µg/animal) n=8-10
After 24 hr & 7 days
Ali-Boucetta et al., Adv Health Mat, 2013
C57 BL/6 mice (6weeks old)
Graphene safety profile | Analogy with Carbon Nanotubes – Mesothelium model
Graphene safety profile | Potential Limitations (beyond environmental health)
Bussy et al., Nanoscale, 2015
Main outcome: Pulmonary system is tissue of highest risk, regardless of administration route. Lungs are organs: • with highest accumulation of GBMs (>100 nm) & • site of reported adverse effects
Bussy et al., Acc Chem Res, 2013
SAFETY RULES 1. to use small, individual CNMs that macrophages in the body can efficiently
internalize and remove from the site of deposition; 2. to use hydrophilic, stable, colloidal dispersions of CNMs to minimize
aggregation in vivo; 3. to use excretable CNMs or chemically-modified CNMs that can be degraded
effectively.
Graphene in Biomedicine| put everything into perspective
Kostarelos, K. and Novoselov K., Science, 2014
Wick et al., Angew Chem Int Ed Engl., 2014 Bianco, Angew Chem Int Ed Engl., 2013
Graphene in Biomedicine| Proposed Classification
3 essential features for bio-interactions:
• Lateral size • Thickness • Functionalization
Increase in Thickness
Increase in Lateral Dimensions Increase in
Functionalisation