Date post: | 14-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | alaina-marsh |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
CERVICAL MEDIAN BRANCH BLOCK AND RF
Dr. Kailash Kothari, MD
History
Patients are presented with pain in neck
Morning stiffness of neck Gets better with heating pad,
activities Intermittent flare ups. Frequent radiation in to neck,
shoulder
Symptoms and Signs
• Unilateral or bilateral paravertebral neck pain
• Upper cervical facet joint that cause not only neck pain but also headaches and cutaneous pain
• Pain frequently referred into the shoulder girdle. Pain can extend to the elbow but is rarely distal to the elbow
• The pain should not follow a radicular pattern
Referred Pain
Physical Examination
Normal Power
Limited ROM of cervical spine in extension
Tenderness over facet joint area
Decreased range of motion of the neck
Local tenderness over affected facet joints
Radiological Tests
X-Ray CT Scan MRI Bone SPECT Scan
Diagnosis
Based on history, Physical Examination and reviewing the radiological tests.
Confirmed by diagnostic and confirmatory blocks of median nerve branch.
Anatomy of Median nerve
CT SCAN
Anatomy
Diagnostic Procedure
Position: ProneSupine with head turned to opposite side
Lateral
Skeletal Anatomy
Median Branch Block
ThreeOverlappingLesions
X-Ray sites for lesion
Oblique view
Anatomy
Therapeutic Block
Intra Articular Block
Cervicogenic Headache
Cervical C1-2 facet joint can be culprit for chronic occipital cervical area headache.
Proper diagnosis including X-Ray, CT Scan, Bone Scan is helpful
Diagnostic block is helpful
C1- C2 Pathology
AA Joint
Headache is a symptom Rheumatoid Arthritis Subluxation Neurological sequel Lateral approach to block joint. Surgical correction and fusion
Follow Up
Diagnostic Median Branch Block Differentiate Nerve Blocks Intra articular Facet Joint Injection Length of time of pain relief Repeat procedure Additional PT etc
Is Patient a Good Candidate for RF?
Proper blocks for diagnostic and therapeutic
Consistent results More than 80% pain relief Patient Is motivated
Indications
Thermal radiofrequency ablation of facet joint nerves is proven for chronic cervical, thoracic and lumbar pain when confirmed by: Positive response to diagnostic and
confirmatory median nerve branch block or intra-articular block
Temp >60 degree C Duration 60-90 sec Use fluroscopy, CT
RF
Size of needle tip Single or multiple needles up to 3 in
parallel Curved or Straight needle Patient position Minimum length of time for RF lesion Minimum Temperature >45degree Pulse RF
C4
C5
C6
3 lesions at C4
2 lesions at C5
3 lesions at C6
results
Manchikanti et al. (2003) There was strong evidence for short-
term pain relief Moderate evidence for long-term
pain relief of chronic low back, thoracic, and neck facet joint pain.
Results
Cervical radiofrequency neurotomy reduces central hyperexcitability and improves neck movement in individuals with chronic whiplash. Smith AD, Jull G, Schneider G, Frizzell B, Hooper RA, Sterling M. Pain Med. 2014 Jan;15(1):128-41. doi: 10.1111/pme.12262. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
53 patients with whiplash 30 healthy controls Significant early (within 1 month) and sustained (3
months) improvements in pain, disability, local and widespread hyperalgesia to pressure and thermal stimuli, nociceptive flexor reflex threshold, and brachial plexus provocation test responses as well as increased neck range of motion (all P < 0.0001)
Results – long term
Pain Pract. 2014 Jan;14(1):8-15. doi: 10.1111/papr.12043. Epub 2013 Mar 18. Long-term follow-up of cervical facet medial branch radiofrequency treatment with with the single posterior-lateral approach: an exploratory study van Eerd M1, de Meij N, Dortangs E, Kessels A, van Zundert J, Lataster A, Patijn J, van Kleef M.
130 pat Radiofrequency treatment of the cervical facet joints
using a single posterior-lateral approach is a promising technique in patients with chronic neck pain due to facet degeneration. The short-term and long-term therapeutic effects of this intervention justify a randomized controlled trial to estimate the efficacy of cervical facet joint RF treatment in a chronic neck pain population patients
Results
Barnsley (2005). 35 patients Retrospective
Twelve patients had 2 procedures. 80% achieved significant relief of
pain. Pain relief continued after a median
follow-up of 35 weeks.
Results
Shin 2006.28 patients with chronic cervicobrachialgia
6 months following RFA, 19 (68%) patients reported successful outcome and 8 (42%) of these patients reported complete pain relief.
Four patients had recurrence of pain between 6 and 12 months.
Results
American Society of Interventional Pain Physicians (ASIPP): A 2009 practice guideline states (Manchikanti et al. 2009)
suggested therapeutic frequency for medial branch neurotomy should remain at intervals of at least 6 months or longer per each region (maximum of 2 times per year) between each procedure.
Provided that 50% or greater relief is obtained for 10 to 12 weeks.
Guidelines
(ASA): A 2010 guideline states Conventional 80°Cor thermal (e.g., 67°C)
radiofrequency ablation of the medial branch nerves to the facet joint should be performed for low back (medial branch) pain when previous diagnostic or therapeutic injections of the joint or medial branch nerve have provided temporary relief.
Conventional radiofrequency ablation may be performed for neck pain.
Water-cooled radiofrequency ablation may be used for chronic sacroiliac joint pain.
Conventional or thermal radiofrequency ablation of the dorsal root ganglion should not be routinely used for the treatment of lumbar radicular pain.
Pulse RF
PRFA delivers short bursts of radiofrequency (RF) current, of 2Hz with temperatures not exceeding 42°C
This allows the tissue to cool between bursts.
Lower maximum temperatures as compared with the continuous mode.
Lesser the risk of surrounding tissue destruction.
Results Pulse RF
A retrospective study by Mikeladze et al. (2003) of 114 patients cervical or lumbar facet joint pain
responsive to diagnostic medial branch blocks and subsequently treated with PRF at 42°C for 120 seconds found that 68 patients had significant pain relief (> 50% pain reduction) that lasted an average of nearly 4 months. Eighteen patients had the procedure repeated with the same duration of pain relief that was achieved initially.
The authors concluded that due to the short duration of pain relief with pulse radiofrequency therapy, this therapy is less effective than standard thermal radiofrequency ablation and improvement following pulsed radiofrequency therapy lasting more than 4 months is possibly the result of the natural course of the disease rather than the procedure itself.
Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2008 Jan; 12(1): 37–41. Pulsed Radiofrequency for Chronic Pain David Byrd, MD, MPH and Sean Mackey, MD, PhD
Various articles using pRF in different condition were discussed, and concluded that pRF may be an effective treatment option for chronic pain conditions
Eur Spine J. 2014 Sep;23(9):1927-32. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3412-x. Epub 2014 Jul 6.
Effect of pulsed radiofrequency in treatment of facet-joint origin back pain in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Hashemi M, Hashemian M, Mohajerani SA, Sharifi G. Patients were randomly assigned to - group one
received pulsed RF, and group 2 received injection by steroids (triamcinolone) and bupivacaine.
80 patient Results - PRF more effective than steroid and bupivacaine
injection in decreasing back pain due to degenerative facet pain and improvement in function of patients.
Conclusion
Facet pain is clinical diagnosis Diagnostic block is gold standard RF ablation is proven therapy and
gives lasting relief in most patients RF ablation is easily repeatable
procedure Post procedure rehabilitation
programme helps improving outcome
THANK YOU