+ All Categories
Home > Education > Dr Sadhana Singh

Dr Sadhana Singh

Date post: 05-Dec-2014
Category:
Upload: iapsmupukcon2010
View: 770 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
15
1 predictors of Menstrual Hygiene Practices as key determinant of RTI among ever-married ‘in- migrant’ women of Dehradun Authors: Singh Sadhna ,Kandpal SD,Roy D
Transcript
Page 1: Dr Sadhana Singh

1

Socio-demographic predictors of Menstrual Hygiene Practices as key determinant of RTI among

ever-married ‘in-migrant’ women

of Dehradun

Authors:

Singh Sadhna,Kandpal SD,Roy D

Page 2: Dr Sadhana Singh

2

Background:

Considering huge burden of RTI across community based study settings, menstrual hygiene practices by reproductive age group women have documented evidence of being a key determinant of RTI and bearing causal association with Socio-demographic attributes.

Page 3: Dr Sadhana Singh

3

Objectives:

1. Study menstrual hygiene practices of ever-married ‘in-migrant’ women from Dehradun as a key determinant of RH needs.

2. Establish causal association between menstrual hygiene practices and (i) key socio-demographic attributes (ii) RTI

Page 4: Dr Sadhana Singh

4

Material & Method:

An observational (cross-sectional) study was designed with a probability sample of 965 ever-married women of 15-49 yrs from 06 ‘make-shift settlements’/slums along immediate precincts i.e 50 meters into the mainland from the banks of rivers- all in the district of Dehradun.

Page 5: Dr Sadhana Singh

Distribution of study population by use of cloth during menses

Menstrual hygiene Practices

No. of Respondents

Percentage

Use of cloth during mensesUsed clothFresh clothSanitary padsHome- made pads

101605127132

10.4662.6913.1613.67

Page 6: Dr Sadhana Singh

6

Used cloth Fresh cloth Sanitary pads Home- made pads0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

10.46

62.69

13.16 13.67

Distribution of study population by use of cloth during menses

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Page 7: Dr Sadhana Singh

Distribution of study subjects according to

menstrual hygiene practices and literacy

Menstrual hygiene Literacy Level of

Significance (p)

Illiterate(n=671) Literate(n=294)

Used Cloth 92 13 0.000032

Fresh Cloth 492 105 0.0000000

Sanitary pads 20 110 0.0000000

Home- made pads 67 66 0.0000004

Page 8: Dr Sadhana Singh

8

Used Cloth Fresh Cloth Sanitary pads Home- made pads0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

13.71

73.32

2.98

9.99

4.42

35.71 37.41

22.45

Distribution of study subjects according to menstrual hygiene practices and literacy

Illiterate(n=671) Literate(n=294)

Pe

rce

nta

ge

Page 9: Dr Sadhana Singh

Distribution of Study Subjects according to Menstrual Hygiene Practice and Religion

Menstrual Hygiene practices

Religion Level of significance (p)

Hindu Muslim

Used cloth 70(8.34%) 15(14.42%) 0.041

Fresh cloth 530(63.18%)

62(59.62%) 0.421

Sanitary pads 112(14.54%) 18(17.31%) 0.605

Home- made pads 127(15.14%)

9(8.65%) 0.075

Page 10: Dr Sadhana Singh

10

Used cloth Fresh cloth Sanitary pads Home- made pads0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

8.34

63.18

14.54 15.1414.42

59.62

17.31

8.65

Distribution of study subjects according to menstrual hygiene practice and religion

Hindu (n=839) Muslim (n=104)

Perc

enta

ge

Page 11: Dr Sadhana Singh

Distribution of study subjects according

to menstrual hygiene practice and SES

Menstrual hygiene practice of using

Socio-economic status Level of significance

Upper class (n=179)

Lower class (n=786)

Used cloth 5(2.80%) 84(10.69%) 0.00093

Fresh cloth 71(39.66%) 546(69.46%) 0.0000000

Sanitary pad 57(31.84%) 68(8.65%) 0.0000000

Home- made pad 46(25.70%) 88(11.19%) 0.0000004

Page 12: Dr Sadhana Singh

12

Used cloth Fresh cloth Sanitary pad Home- made pad0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2.8

39.66

31.84

25.7

10.69

69.46

8.6511.19

Distribution of study subjects according to menstrual hygiene practice and SES

Upper class (n=179) Lower class (n=786)

Perc

enta

ge

Page 13: Dr Sadhana Singh

13

Menstrual Hygiene Practice and RTI/STI- Distribution of study subjects according to

menstrual hygiene and RTI/STISymptomsof RTI/STI

Menstrual hygiene practice (n=965) Level of significance

Used cloth (n=101)

Fresh cloth (n=605)

Sanitarypads

(n=127)

Home-made pads (n=132)

Vaginaldischarge

88(87.13%) 137(14.19%) 27(2.79%) 21(2.17%) 0.000

Itching 46(45.54%) 86(8.91%) 14(1.45%) 11(1.13%) 0.000

Boils 20(19.80%) 37(3.83%) 9(0.93%) 3(0.31%) 0.000

Pain lower abdomen

54(53.46%) 95(9.84%) 18(1.86%) 19(1.96%) 0.000

Pain during sexual intercourse

42(41.58%) 95(9.84%) 20(2.07%) 18(1.86%) 0.000

Backache 73(72.28%) 104(17.19%) 17(2.79%) 25(2.59%) 0.000

Lymph-adenopathy

3(2.97%) 11(1.81%) 2(0.20%) 0(0%) 0.000

Page 14: Dr Sadhana Singh

14

Used cloth (n=101) Fresh cloth (n=605) Sanitary pads (n=127)

Home-made pads (n=132)

0102030405060708090

10087

14

3 2

46

9

1 1

20

41 1

53

10

2 2

42

10

2 2

72

17

3 33 2 1 0

Distribution of study subjects according to menstrual hygiene and RTI/STI

Vaginal discharge Itching Boils Pain lower abdomen

Pain during sexual intercourse Backache Lymph-adenopathy

Per

cen

tag

e

Page 15: Dr Sadhana Singh

15

Results:

The present study findings revealed that as a key determinant of RH needs, menstrual hygiene practices of the study population bore significant statistical association with their Socio demographic attributes & key RTI symptoms.


Recommended