Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Vol. 4, No. 4 (2009) 409 - 418 © School of Engineering, Taylor’s University College
409
DRASTIC ENHANCEMENT OF PROPENE YIELD FROM 1-HEXENE CATALYTIC CRACKING USING A SHAPE
INTENSIFIED MESO-SAPO-34 CATALYST
ZEESHAN NAWAZ*, JIE ZHU, FEI WEI
Beijing Key Laboratory of Green Chemical Reaction Engineering
and Technology (FLOTU), Department of chemical Engineering,
Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
* Corresponding author: [email protected]
Abstract
A shape intensified Meso-SAPO-34 catalyst was designed and used to improve
the yield and selectivity of propene from 1-hexene cracking. The propene was
produced with an optimal selectivity of 73.9 wt.% with high feed conversion
98.2 wt.% at 14 per hour WHSV. Robust exponential control of the
stereochemistry was observed over the Meso-SAPO-34 shape selective
catalyst’s cracking. The influence of the operating parameters on 1-hexene
catalytic cracking, such as reaction temperature, time-on-stream effect on
product distribution and conversion variations were systematically studied. The
yield of propene and conversion rapidly increased with the reaction
temperature, until 575oC. Shape intensification and topological integration of
SAPO-34 increases the diffusion opportunities for feed, and this phenomenon
was found to be responsible for drastic increase in 1-hexene conversion and
propene yield. One other reason for this increase is the suppression of surface
reactions (isomerization and hydride transfer) owing to better diffusion
opportunities. About 55 wt.% propene yield and higher total olefins content was
achieved over Meso-SAPO-34.
Keywords: Cracking, Propene, Shape intensification, Diffusion, Meso-SAPO-34.
1. Introduction
Propene is the principal raw material for production of important
petrochemicals, such as polypropylene, acrylonitrile, propylene oxide, cumene,
phenol, oxo-alcohols, alkylates blends, isopropylic alcohol, acrylic acid,
isopropyl alcohol, polygas chemicals [1, 2]. The continuous increase in demand
410 Zeeshan Nawaz et al.
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology December 2009, Vol. 4(4)
Abbreviations
BET Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (m2/g)
CTO Catalyst to oil ratio
DCC Deep catalytic cracking
FCC Fluid catalytic cracking
FID Flame ionization detector
GC Gas chromatography
IUPAC International union of pure and applied chemistry
MSCC Millisecond catalytic cracking
PIONA Paraffin’s, i-paraffins, olefins, naphthenes, and aromatics
SAPO Silicoaluminophosphate
TOS Time-on-stream
WHSV Weight hourly space velocity (h-1)
XRD X-ray diffraction
of propene has lead to the development of new catalysts and on purpose
propene producing processes.
Fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) products were containing higher olefins while it
shows selectivity towards alkane and the processes were governed by hydrogen-
transfer reactions. Moreover olefins yield from FCC is still limited due to its
complexity and process severity. It is also known that increasing process
severities, leads to maximize propene production in FCC units up to 7% [3].
The on-purpose propene technologies are currently being developed to obtain
higher yields of propene from FCC units by upgrading low value refinery streams
like C4–C6 olefins and their overall reaction kinetics is recently proposed by
Huaqun et al. [4]. Recent developments in reactor’s integration, like millisecond
catalytic cracking technology (MSCC), the down-flow reactor technology
(Downer), deep catalytic cracking (DCC), two-stage riser FCC and the new
catalytic cracking technologies for producing light olefins are on the verge of
communication but no drastic improvement has been reported [5]. Catalyst
intensification on the nano-scale was also currently being investigated, e.g.
SAPO-34 in the fixed-bed catalytic cracking process ‘‘Propylur’’, developed by
Lurgi in 1996. In this process Lurgi claims to convert approximately 60 wt.% of
C4 and C5 olefins to propene and ethene using steam cracker [6].
The catalytic enhancement of SAPO-34 zeolite catalysts is still not well
understood and not available through open resources; but it does claim to
demonstrate better performance in hexene catalytic cracking [5]. The effect of
topology on SAPO-34 catalyst performance has been studied here to ascertain any
possible propene production enhancements. In previous studies SAPO-34 was
observed to be more effective for butene cracking and hexane [5, 7, 8].
In the work presented here, 1-hexene cracking over shape intensified
catalyst Meso-SAPO-34 was studied and found that the shape selectivity not
only increased the reaction rate but also improved the propene yield and feed
conversion. Both SAPO-34 and Meso-SAPO-34 results were obtained under
similar operating values and compared in order to explain superiority. The
overall 1-hexene process was parametrically characterized to explored
operational optimization.
Drastic Enhancement of Propene Yield from 1-Hexene Catalytic Cracking 411
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology December 2009, Vol. 4(4)
2. Experimental
2.1. Preparation of Meso-SAPO-34 catalyst and characteristics
Conventional, solid, acidic, zeolite-based catalysts are widely used in the
petrochemical industry for hydrocarbon conversion. In significant features of
SAPO-34 catalyst, it has high catalytic activity for cracking reactions and low
activity for hydrogen-transfer reactions. Characteristics of SAPO-34 including
packing density (0.84 g/cm3), the internal pore size (0.34 Ao) and average
diameter of the particles (~5µm) [9]. The shape intensified catalyst; Meso-SAPO-
34 was designed by Zhu Jie et al. of Beijing Key Lab of Green Reaction
Engineering & Technology (FLOTU), Tsinghua University, Beijing, China [10].
The kaolin (a source of aluminum and silicon), phosphorus, template and de-
ionized water are mixed together and stirred to obtain uniform crystallization
solution. The Al2O3: SiO2: P2O5: H2O molar ratio is 0 ~ 1.5:0 ~ 1.2:0.8 ~ 1.5:2 ~
4:10 ~ 500. The silicon aluminum phosphate catalyst of slit shape i.e. Meso-
SAPO-34 is available shortly after crystallization. The shape intensified Meso-
SAPO-34 catalyst was characterized through X-ray diffraction (XRD). The Meso-
SAPO-34 catalyst possesses an internal structure similar to cube shape SAPO-34,
but with different quoin and topology. Although in many experimental studies
SAPO-34 cracking ability has proven to be uniform among available cracking
catalysts, the slit shaped topology of Meso-SAPO-34 offers a more robust design
for exponential enhancement of activity by increasing pore diffusivity.
The structure of Meso-SAPO-34 is shown in Fig. 1 and its XRD pattern is
shown in Fig. 2 [8]. The internal pore size, acidity, and XRD pattern of Meso-
SAPO-34 is almost similar to SAPO-34 [8], except the outer shaping quo’s (see
Fig. 1). Therefore characterization of Meso-SAPO-34 is useless but their cracking
performance can only be justified on the experimental grounds. The single point
surface area at P/Po is 0.2012: 540.3451, BET surface area 522.3917 and
Langmuir surface area was 689.102.
Fig. 1. SEM Image of the
Outer Shaping Quo’s of
Meso-SAPO-34 Catalyst.
0 10 20 30 40 50
Intensity (a. u.)
2 Theta (angle)
Fig. 2. XRD of Meso-SAPO-34.
412 Zeeshan Nawaz et al.
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology December 2009, Vol. 4(4)
2.2. Feed stock and products
All alkenes have the general formula CnH2n, so propene is CH3-CH=CH2 and
molar mass of 42.08 g/mol [11]. Although the official IUPAC nomenclatures for
saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons are alkanes and alkenes, respectively by
IUPAC, these compounds are also known as paraffin’s and olefins. Thus many
acronyms and industrial concepts are also based on these common names e.g.
“PIONA” (paraffin’s, i-paraffins, olefins, naphthenes, and aromatics) analysis and
“olefinicity” (the relative amount of olefins within a certain product group) [12].
Here we refer to individual species according to IUPAC nomenclature; e.g.
ethane, propene and use non-IUPAC nomenclature (olefins and paraffin’s) when
addressing groups of hydrocarbons. Analytical grade 98 % pure 1-hexene
(IUPAC name: hex-1-ene) of AlfaAesar (A. Johanson Matthey Company, UK)
was used as a model FCC feed in current experimental investigations in a micro-
reactor. All the values were calculated and presented in weight percentages.
2.3. Feed stock and products
The experimental setup was designed to analyze the robustness and exponential
control of the Meso-SAPO-34 catalyst’s on a model FCC component 1-hexene
cracking in a micro-reactor. After the cracking reaction the product gas was
analyzed using on-line Gas Chromatography equipped with FID (Techcomp
Holdings Ltd., Model GC-7890II). The used FID has a sensitivity of Mt = 1×10-
11 g/s and was used at 200oC. The measured amount of Meso-SAPO-34 catalyst
was mixed with 0.2 g of inert material. The rector pressure was maintained at
0.02 MPa and the feed loading rate was adjusted at 10 ml/min in all experiments
in order to obtain the desired WHSV i.e 14 h-1.
3. Results and Discussions
The activity of intensified topological SAPO-34 catalyst (Meso-SAPO-34) has been
experimentally studied and found suitable for propene enhancement. As
isomerization rate is much faster than cracking [13], but Slit-SAPO-34 better
diffusion ability reduces the possibilities of surface reactions. Extensive
experimentation has been carried out between the temperature range of 450-600oC
at varying TOS and fixed WHSV, 14 h-1.
Initially, the selectivity of propene increased, but then decreased at 500oC with
a sudden increase in conversion. After 500oC, both selectivity and yield gradually
increased with the increasing conversion of propane on TOS = 1 min. (see Fig. 3).
At higher TOS (5 min.) the catalyst quickly deactivates above 575oC with a
maximum 66.5% propene yield and 73.9% selectivity was obtained (see Fig. 4).
The present conversion begins to decline after TOS = 4 min. and temperature
575oC with a sudden decrease in yield and selectivity (see Fig. 5).
1-hexene was first cracked over Lewis acid site and as the L/B ratio increased with
the increase in temperature, conversion also increased [14]. It has long been reported
that at higher temperatures and lower pressures, the adsorption of hydrocarbons
decreases and monomolecular mechanism will enhanced; in fact dominating the
dimeric cracking mechanism [12]. The cracking of olefins at FCC reaction conditions
favors the formation of small olefins such as propene experimentally explained by
Drastic Enhancement of Propene Yield from 1-Hexene Catalytic Cracking 413
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology December 2009, Vol. 4(4)
450 475 500 525 550 575 600
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
% Conversion of 1-Hexene (X)
% Yield of Propene (Y)
% Selectivity of Propene (Z)X / Y / Z wt%
Temperature oC
TOS = 1min
Ea = 18 kJ/mol
WHSV = 14 h-1
Fig. 3. Effect of Temperature on 1-hexene Cracking
at TOS = 1 min. in a Micro-reactor.
450 475 500 525 550 575 600
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
TOS = 5min
Ea = 20.5 kJ/mol
WHSV = 14 h-1
% Conversion of 1-Hexene (X)
% Yield of Propene (Y)
% Selectivity of Propene (Z)
X / Y / Z wt%
Temperature oC
Fig. 4. Effect of Temperature on 1-hexene Cracking
at TOS = 5 min. in a Micro-reactor.
1 2 3 4 5
60
70
80
90
100
CTO5.16.48.412.525.1
% Conversion of 1-Hexene (X)
% Yield of Propene (Y)
% Selectivity of Propene (Z)
X / Y / Z wt%
TOS, min
Temperature= 575oC
WHSV = 14 h-1
Fig. 5. At Constant Temperature 575oC, TOS Influence
on % Conversion, % Yields and % Selectivity of Propene.
414 Zeeshan Nawaz et al.
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology December 2009, Vol. 4(4)
Xaioping et al. [5]. It has also been demonstrated that the medium pore size zeolite
catalyst, SAPO-34 has better cracking ability owing to its shape selectivity as reported
by Tabak et al. [15, 8].
In current experimentation, however we observed that for the same catalyst
pore size, changes in quo’s and topology can have a drastic effect in enhancing
the desired product. This enhancement can be attributed to better diffusion
abilities provide by Meso-SAPO-34. There is still controversy regarding the
nature of acid sites action for sustained hydride transfer and it may prolong
alkylation activities [16]. The decrease of the hydrogen transfer coefficient with
the reaction temperature indicates that higher temperatures favor
monomolecular cracking and enhancement of light olefin formation [17].
Comparison of Meso-SAPO-34 and SAPO-34 catalytic performance for
1-hexene cracking under identical conditions has been shown in Fig. 6, and
similar results were shown in literature [8]. Significant difference in conversion
can be seen while slightly higher propylene selectivity at higher conversion
over Meso-SAPO-34 was observed. Detailed experimental results obtained at
different temperatures and TOS were show in Table 1, except propene because
it has been presented through graphs.
1 2 3 4 5
0
20
40
60
80
100
Conversion, %
TOS, min
Meso-SAPO-34 at 550oC
SAPO-34 at 550oC
WHSV = 14 h-1
Fig. 6. 1-Hexene Conversion over SAPO-34 and Meso-SAPO-34 at 550oC.
The product distribution obtained at optimum cracking temperature of 575oC
is shown in Fig. 7. Under fixed feed flow rate of 10 ml/min, increasing the TOS
from 1-5 min. decreases the CTO to 25.1, 12.5, 8.4, 6.4 and 5.1 respectively. The
% yield of propene and % selectivity increases with the increase in TOS up to 4
min and then becomes stagnant. The C3/C2 ratio also increases with time and
temperature up to 575oC. In all the current experiments, at WHSV = 14 h-1, no
methane and C7+ carbons were detected. Buchanan et al. [18] explained all
possible cracking schemes after extensive experimentation; the dominant cracking
reaction is C-type β-scission (see Scheme 1) while using Slit-SAPO-34 as a
catalyst [18, 8].
Drastic Enhancement of Propene Yield from 1-Hexene Catalytic Cracking 415
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology December 2009, Vol. 4(4)
Table 1. Percentage Yield of Total Olefins and Ethene with
Percentage Conversion of Feed (in Temperatures Range
of 450-600oC and TOS = 1 - 5 min., at WHSV = 14 h-1).
Temperature, oC
TOS,
min.
% conversion
of 1-hexene
% yield of
total olefins
% yield of
ethene
1 63.949 95.229 4.237 2 47.187 96.905 1.862 3 42.246 96.712 1.492 4 38.989 96.945 1.276
450
5 36.861 97.359 1.142 1 95.836 89.087 8.180 2 94.813 90.389 8.014 3 91.341 93.133 6.647 4 87.456 94.815 5.230
500
5 82.874 95.776 4.204 1 97.400 92.771 12.636 2 96.447 94.824 10.897 3 95.162 95.973 8.556 4 93.175 96.859 6.869
550
5 88.310 97.416 5.404 1 98.207 93.305 13.689 2 97.848 94.913 12.376 3 96.231 96.516 9.915 4 94.139 97.281 8.060
575
5 89.965 97.862 6.335
1 2 3 4 5
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
% Selectivity
TOS, min
Ethane
Ethene
Propane
Iso-Butane
n-Butane
trans-2-butene
1-butene
Iso-Butene
cis-2-butene
Pentane
Pentene
Hexane
Hexene
25.1 12.5 8.4 6.4 5.1 CTO
Fig. 7. At Temperature 575oC and WHSV 14 h-1,
TOS and CTO Influence on Product Distribution.
Scheme 1. Carbenium Ion Formation in 1-hexene Cracking,
C-type β-Scission Mode [8].
416 Zeeshan Nawaz et al.
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology December 2009, Vol. 4(4)
At the same reaction conditions the balance between mono-molecular and
bimolecular mechanisms will depend on the characteristics of the catalyst. The
medium pore size of Meso-SAPO-34 will favors the monomolecular mechanism.
Since the bimolecular reaction intermediates cannot be formed during the course
of cracking. The conversion of 1-hexene and yield of propene shows a rapid
increase with the increase in reaction temperature and decreases with reference to
the catalyst-to-oil ratio. However, at lower catalyst-to-oil ratios the hydrogen-
transfer reactions were negligibly low. The optimum operating conditions are
therefore moderate residence time for high yields of propene combined with (i)
lower yields of dry gas and (ii) a lower apparent hydrogen-transfer coefficient.
One of the interesting findings of our current experimentations is the initially high
yield and selectivity of propene, which decreased rapidly up to 80% by increasing
TOS at all temperatures (Fig. 8). Therefore, optimum TOS and catalyst
deactivation integration provides a significant guidance towards severity of the
operating parameters with the Meso-SAPO-34 catalyst.
480 500 520 540 560 580 600
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Yield of Propene (%)
Temperature oC
TOS=1min
TOS=2min
TOS=3min
TOS=4min
TOS=5min
Fig. 8. Influence of Temperature on % Yield of Propane
during 1-hexene cracking over Meso-SAPO-34.
Meso-SAPO-34 catalyst exhibits high activity and can reduce the production of
by-products such as methane and coke. It should be noted that the ethene and butane
are the second prominent products which promotes a significant impact in overall %
yield of total olefins. Meso-SAPO-34 catalyst has a significant advantage as the
higher desired product yield and gives less coke formation than SAPO-34.
4. Conclusion
The influence of primary operating parameters such as reaction temperature, catalyst-
to-oil ratio and residence time on product distribution and conversion was
systematically studied. Because of very high conversion rates, even at high WHSV,
therefore lower CTO is needed during cracking. The Meso-SAPO-34 catalyst
promotes C-type β-scission and significantly retards HT-surface reactions.
Increasing catalyst-to-oil ratio can enhance 1-hexene cracking rate and
improves the yield of propene even at higher temperatures to some extent. While
increase in catalyst-to-oil ratio will leads towards secondary reactions and
decrease the desired product yield and selectivity. The percentage selectivity of
Drastic Enhancement of Propene Yield from 1-Hexene Catalytic Cracking 417
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology December 2009, Vol. 4(4)
propene and conversion showed a rapid increase with increasing reaction
temperature up to 575oC. But further increase in propene selectivity was at the
cost of lower feed conversion along with the increase of by-products were
observed and found unsuitable. This drastic increase in propene yield was
attributed to an enhanced opportunity for diffusion owing to the change in
existing SAPO-34 catalyst intensification.
The results suggest that at the optimum operating parameters investigated were
575oC and TOS = 1 min. at WHSV = 14 h-1, the conversion of 1-hexene achieved
was approximately 98.2 wt.%. The optimum propene selectivity was observed to be
73.9 wt.% at 575oC and at TOS = 5 min, propene yield reached a maximum
66.5 wt.%. At optimum conditions, the yield of total olefins was 97.9 wt.%.
This new generation Meso-SAPO-34 catalyst with improved quo’s and
topology provides a significant increase in propene yield and may emerge as a
significant milestone in commercial catalyst design and development for the
enhancement of propene via petroleum based route.
Acknowledgments
The authors are gratefully acknowledged the resources and technical support
provided by Bejing Key Laboratory for Green Chemical Reaction Engineering &
Technology (FLOTU), Department of Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua
University, Beijing, China and to Higher Education Commission, Islamabad,
Pakistan for their financial support.
References
1. Ladwig, P.K.; Asplin, J.E.; Stuntz, G.F.; Wachter, W.A. and Henry, B.E. (2000).
Process for selectively producing light olefins in a fluid catalytic cracking
process. US Patent 6,069,287 (to Exxon Research and Engineering Corporation).
2. Wei, F.; Tang, X.P.; Zhu, H. and Nawaz, Z. (2008). Development of
propylene production enhancement technology. Petrochemical Technology,
37(10), 979-986.
3. Upson, L.L. (2000). FCC process with high temperature cracking zone. US
Patent No. 6,113,776.
4. Zhu, H.; Wang, Y.; Wei, F.; Wang, D.Z. and Wang, Z. (2008). Kinetics of
the reactions of the light alkenes over SAPO-34. Applied Catalysis A:
General, 348(1), 135–141.
5. Xioping, T. (2008). Study on the Downer Fluid Catalytic Cracking and Light
Olefin Conversion for Maximizing Propylene. PhD Thesis, Department of
Chemical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
6. Nawaz, Z.; Tang, X.P.; Zhu, J.; Naveed, S. and Wei, F. (2009). Catalytic
Cracking of 1-Hexene to Propylene Using SAPO-34 Catalysts with Different
Bulk Topologies, Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 30(11), 1049-1057.
418 Zeeshan Nawaz et al.
Journal of Engineering Science and Technology December 2009, Vol. 4(4)
7. Nawaz, Z.; Tang, X.P. and Wei, F. (2009). Hexene Catalytic Cracking over
SAPO-34 Catalyst for Propylene Maximization: Influence of Reaction
Conditions and Reaction Pathway Exploration, Brazilian Journal of
Chemical Engineering, 26(4), 705-712.
8. Nawaz, Z.; Zhu, J. and Fei, W. (2009). Structural Topology Integration of
SAPO-34 Catalyst at nano-level enhances its catalytic activity for FCC model
feed to propylene. Presented at 6th International Bhurban Conference on
Applied Sciences & Technology (IBCAST), Islamabad, Pakistan.
9. Min, P.; Zhi-hong, L.; Yan-jun, G.; Dong, W. and Yuhan, S. (2003). Ab-
initio study on the isomerization of 1-hexene to 2-hexene over the surface of
aluminosilicate molecular sieves. Journal of Material Science Letters,
22(14), 955– 957.
10. Zhu, J.; Cui, Y.; Wang, Y. and Wei, F. (2009). Direct synthesis of
hierarchical zeolite from a natural layered material. Chemical
Communications, 22, 3282-3284.
11. Budavari, S. (1996). Propylene. The Merck Index, Twelfth Edition, New
Jersey: Merck & Co., 1348-1349.
12. Hollander, M.A.; Wissink, M.; Makkee, M. and Moulijn, J.A. (2002).
Gasoline conversion: reactivity towards cracking with equilibrated FCC and
ZSM-5 catalysts. Applied Catalysis A: General, 223(1), 85–102.
13. Choung, S.J. and Butt, J.B. (1990). The selectivity changes in 1-hexene
isomerization and its relation to acid properties of Pd/SAPO-11, SAPO-11,
AZSM-5, and H-Mordenite catalysts. Korean Journal of Chemical
Engineering, 7(3), 175-181.
14. Jung, J.S.; Kim, T.J. and Seo, G. (2004). Catalytic cracking of n-Octane over
zeolites with different pore structures and acidities. Korean Journal of
Chemical Engineering, 21(4), 777-781.
15. Tabak, S.A.; Krambeck, F.J. and Garwood, W.E. (1986). Conversion of
propylene and butylene over ZSM-5 catalyst, AIChE Journal. 32(9), 1526–1531.
16. Feller, A.; Zuazo, I.; Guzman, A.; Barth, J. O. and Lercher, J. A. (2003).
Common mechanistic aspects of liquid and solid acid catalyzed alkylation of
isobutane with n-butene. Journal of Catalysis. 216(1-2), 313-323.
17. Chen, J.W. and Cao, H.C. (2005). Catalytic cracking technology and
engineering. China Petrochemical Press, Beijing, Chapter 2, 154–159.
18. Buchanan, J.S.; Santiesteban, J.G. and Haag, W.O. (1996). Mechanistic
considerations in acid-catalyzed cracking of olefins. Journal of Catalysis,
158(1), 279–287.