+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

Date post: 14-Jun-2022
Category:
Upload: others
View: 7 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
18
Research Article Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft System in Thermal Environment Based on Finite Element Method Zhihao Liu, 1 Renren Wang, 2 Fang Cao , 1 and Pidong Shi 1 1 School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250353, China 2 School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences), Jinan 250353, China Correspondence should be addressed to Fang Cao; [email protected] Received 17 March 2020; Revised 23 June 2020; Accepted 29 July 2020; Published 14 August 2020 Academic Editor: oi Trung Nguyen Copyright © 2020 Zhihao Liu et al. is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. e stable operation of a high-speed rotating rotor-bearing system is dependent on the internal damping of its materials. In this study, the dynamic behaviours of a rotor-shaft system with internal damping composite materials under the action of a temperature field are analysed. e temperature field will increase the tangential force generated by the internal damping of the composite material. e tangential force will also increase with the rotor speed, which can destabilise the rotor-shaft system. To better understand the dynamic behaviours of the system, we introduced a finite element calculation model of a rotor-shaft system based on a 3D high-order element (Solid186) to study the turbocharger rotor-bearing system in a temperature field. e analysis was done according to the modal damping coefficient, stability limit speed, and unbalance response. e results show that accurate prediction of internal damping energy dissipation in a temperature field is crucial for accurate prediction of rotor dynamic performance. is is an important step to understand dynamic rotor stress and rotor dynamic design. 1. Introduction Turbochargers are mechanical devices that can improve fuel efficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. e core component of a turbocharger is a rotor composed mainly of a turbine and a compressor. e turbine is crucial because it can recover energy from the exhaust gas and increase the intake air volume by driving the compressor [1]. It is characterized by light weight and high speed. To meet re- quirements for higher speeds, greater power density, and the ability to adapt to harsh operating environments for a long time, structural designers use various materials to manu- facture the rotor parts. is introduces high requirements for the stable rotation of the rotor. erefore, to analyse the stability of a rotor and its dynamic characteristics, it is necessary to accurately predict the damping effect. Damping is divided into external damping, such as bearing damping, and internal damping, such as material damping, which in turn is mainly modelled by viscous damping and hysteretic damping [2]. In a dynamic composite rotor, internal damping is meaningful only when the matrix can damp [3]. Also, most single materials, such as metals, have vibration damping characteristics similar to those of hysteretic in- ternal damping but not viscous internal damping [4]. Many researchers have studied the effect of material damping on rotor dynamics and stability behaviour. Sin [5] studied the instability phenomenon of a composite shaft with internal damping and calculated the natural frequency and instability threshold of the shaft by using the finite element model for beams. ey found that the stacking sequence of layers of composite materials, the arrangement directions of material fibers, and the transverse shear forces of materials affected the natural frequency and instability threshold of the shaft. Wittgren [6] studied the stability of flexible rotors with flexible supports. ey found that the correct combination of the asymmetry of the internal damping of the shaft material and the anisotropy of bearings could significantly reduce the amplitude at critical speed. Hindawi Shock and Vibration Volume 2020, Article ID 8888504, 18 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8888504
Transcript
Page 1: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

Research ArticleDynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-ShaftSystem in Thermal Environment Based on Finite ElementMethod

Zhihao Liu1 Renren Wang2 Fang Cao 1 and Pidong Shi1

1School of Mechanical and Automotive Engineering Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences)Jinan 250353 China2School of Electrical Engineering and Automation Qilu University of Technology (Shandong Academy of Sciences)Jinan 250353 China

Correspondence should be addressed to Fang Cao caofangqlueducn

Received 17 March 2020 Revised 23 June 2020 Accepted 29 July 2020 Published 14 August 2020

Academic Editor oi Trung Nguyen

Copyright copy 2020 Zhihao Liu et al is is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution Licensewhich permits unrestricted use distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited

e stable operation of a high-speed rotating rotor-bearing system is dependent on the internal damping of its materials In thisstudy the dynamic behaviours of a rotor-shaft system with internal damping composite materials under the action of atemperature field are analysed e temperature field will increase the tangential force generated by the internal damping of thecomposite material e tangential force will also increase with the rotor speed which can destabilise the rotor-shaft system Tobetter understand the dynamic behaviours of the system we introduced a finite element calculation model of a rotor-shaft systembased on a 3D high-order element (Solid186) to study the turbocharger rotor-bearing system in a temperature field e analysiswas done according to the modal damping coefficient stability limit speed and unbalance responsee results show that accurateprediction of internal damping energy dissipation in a temperature field is crucial for accurate prediction of rotor dynamicperformance is is an important step to understand dynamic rotor stress and rotor dynamic design

1 Introduction

Turbochargers are mechanical devices that can improve fuelefficiency and reduce greenhouse gas emissions e corecomponent of a turbocharger is a rotor composed mainly ofa turbine and a compressor e turbine is crucial because itcan recover energy from the exhaust gas and increase theintake air volume by driving the compressor [1] It ischaracterized by light weight and high speed To meet re-quirements for higher speeds greater power density and theability to adapt to harsh operating environments for a longtime structural designers use various materials to manu-facture the rotor parts is introduces high requirementsfor the stable rotation of the rotor erefore to analyse thestability of a rotor and its dynamic characteristics it isnecessary to accurately predict the damping effect Dampingis divided into external damping such as bearing dampingand internal damping such as material damping which inturn is mainly modelled by viscous damping and hysteretic

damping [2] In a dynamic composite rotor internaldamping is meaningful only when the matrix can damp [3]Also most single materials such as metals have vibrationdamping characteristics similar to those of hysteretic in-ternal damping but not viscous internal damping [4]

Many researchers have studied the effect of materialdamping on rotor dynamics and stability behaviour Sin [5]studied the instability phenomenon of a composite shaftwith internal damping and calculated the natural frequencyand instability threshold of the shaft by using the finiteelement model for beams ey found that the stackingsequence of layers of composite materials the arrangementdirections of material fibers and the transverse shear forcesof materials affected the natural frequency and instabilitythreshold of the shaft Wittgren [6] studied the stability offlexible rotors with flexible supports ey found that thecorrect combination of the asymmetry of the internaldamping of the shaft material and the anisotropy of bearingscould significantly reduce the amplitude at critical speed

HindawiShock and VibrationVolume 2020 Article ID 8888504 18 pageshttpsdoiorg10115520208888504

Montagnier [7] used EulerndashBernoulli shaft model to analysethe critical speed of a flexible internal resistance rotorsupported by elastic bearings to obtain the stable workingrange of the rotor ey found that most of the rotor in-stability was caused by the internal damping of the materialIncreasing the bearing damping could make the rotor runmore stably and they established a rotor instability analysismodel that included the internal resistance of the materialVitta [8] used linear and nonlinear evaluation methods toanalyse the effect of internal damping on the dynamic be-haviour of a shaft e results show that the critical sub-critical and stable limit speeds of a rotor can be obtained bylinear evaluation Newkirk [9] studied internal damping andfound that a rotor may vibrate violently at a speed higherthan the first critical speed Genta [10] explained that thehysteretic damping of rotating structures is stable in thesubcritical range but unstable in the supercritical range Allthose researchers proved that the instability speed is higherthan the first-order critical speed when considering thehysteretic damping of rotating structures Also many re-searchers have studied the combined effects of materialdamping and bearing damping e results show that in-creasing the bearing damping can improve the stability ofthe rotor but increasing the material damping can reducethe instability threshold [6]

e effect of the surrounding temperature on materialdamping of a turbocharger rotor cannot be disregarded inhigh-temperature environments It is very important tounderstand the dynamic behaviours of the structure invarious temperatures when designing a rotor to operate inthermal extremes San [11] established a nonlinear rotor-bearing finite element model e model considered thethermal effects of lubricating oil and the thermal expansionsof the rotor shaft and bearing and San Andres analysed thenatural frequency stability and unbalanced response of therotor e results show that the natural frequency andsynchronous speed amplitude obtained by the simulationwere completely consistent with the experimental valueswhich verified the feasibility of the finite element modelZych [12] used a finite element method to calculate thethermal stress of a radial axial microturbine in a high-temperature environment In the calculation they consid-ered the mass of the disc the rotation speed of the rotor andthe complex shape at the rear of the disc eir work showedthat numerical calculation helps to choose the best opti-mization method and they reduced the turbinersquos von Misesstress by approximately 45 Jeyaraj [13] uniformly heated athin plate that incorporated various internal dampingcomposite materials and did free vibration and forced vi-bration analyses e study found that with increasingtemperature the vibration amplitude (response) of the thinplate structure decreased but the modal loss factor increasedsignificantly with increasing temperature thereby reducingthe vibration amplitude Its response frequency also de-creased with increasing temperature Guo [14] did thermalvibration analysis of a rotating beam structure with con-strained layer damping e study found that as the tem-perature increased the modal frequency of the beamstructure decreased accordingly and the damping ratio

increased accordingly at study provides a basis for dy-namic analysis of high-speed rotating blades in variousthermal environments However the number of articles onthis subject is limited

erefore this research studied the dynamic characteristicsof internal material damping and an oil film force turbochargerrotor-bearing system under thermal environments (tempera-ture fields)We used the conjugate heat transfer (CHT)methodto simulate the temperature field of the solid part of a rotor-shaft system e temperature field was coupled with the finiteelement model of the rotor compared with the instancewithout considering the temperature field e rotor finiteelement is verified by experiment

2 Numerical Model and Research Methods

21 Fluid and Heat Transfer Sections Before the thermalmodal analysis the aerodynamic thermal analysis wasperformed e current industry standard modelling ap-proaches assume the turbine and compressor operate underadiabatic conditions [15] e CHT simulation method[16ndash22] is used to obtain the temperature distribution of therotor and the node temperature is provided for the modalsimulation part

211 Turbocharge and Compressor Geometry e turbo-charger had an impeller with 10 blades and the compressorhad an impeller with 6 blades and 6 splitters e turbo-charger and compressor parameters are shown in Table 1 Toimprove the accuracy of the calculations we modelled boththe turbocharger and the compressor using full passagesesolid parts and the air flow are shown in Figure 1

212 Grid Generation CHT involves the direct coupling offluids and solids ICEM grid discretisation software (AnsysInc USA) uses the same numerical principles and griddiscretisation for both regions is allows the non-interpolated exchange of heat flux between adjacent grids[23] e calculation accuracy of CHT is very sensitive to theresolution of the fluid boundary layer grid erefore thedimensionless distance y+ 1 or less (in this paper y+ 1)of the wall distance of the first layer of the grid can determinethe local heat flux with enough accuracy As shown inFigures 2 and 3 the fluid domain solid domain (rotorimpeller) and boundary layer grid were generated for CHTcalculations e total number of global grids was12329631 with 2067903 global grid nodes Following theshape of the outer contour of the rotor we used a triangulartetrahedral mesh with good adaptability to the outer con-tour and we used smoothing to optimize the mesh eimpeller grid and the fluid grid were connected in a generalgrid interface mode in Ansys CFX software

213 Boundary Conditions We determined the boundaryconditions for aerodynamic thermal analysis using experi-mental data provided by the turbocharger company theboundary conditions are shown in Table 2

2 Shock and Vibration

Table 1 Turbocharger and compressor parameters

Turbine side Compressor sideParameters Value and units Parameters Value and unitsBlades number 10 Blades number 6 + 6 (minus)Impeller inlet diameter 5505mm Impeller outlet diameter 565mmTip clearance 041mm Tip clearance 026mm

Turbineside

Solid casing Solid casingInlet

Inlet

Outlet

Impeller Impeller

Sha

Compressorside

Outlet

Figure 1 Centrifugal turbocharger and compressor with a solid casing

Figure 2 Global grid for conjugate heat transfer calculation

Turbinefluid

Turbineimpeller

Compressorfluid Compressor

impeller

Figure 3 Computational grids for conjugate heat transfer calculation

Table 2 e boundary conditions for aerothermal analysis

Turbine side Compressor sideMedium (intensity 5) Medium (intensity 5)Inlet mass flow 0074 kgs Inlet total pressure 999359 PaInlet total temperature 87297K Inlet total temperature 297201 KOutlet static pressure 968927 Pa Outlet static pressure 127578 Pa

Shock and Vibration 3

e heat transfer of the surrounding air was disregardedand the out-wall of the turbocharger was assumed to beadiabatic We applied ldquono-sliprdquo boundary conditions to allinner walls An interface was added between the rotatingdomain and the fixed domain and the interface was con-nected by a ldquofrozen rotorrdquo [24]

214 Numerical Methodology CHTrefers to a coupled heattransfer phenomenon in which the thermal properties of twomaterials occur through a medium or in direct contact eCHT method can calculate the heat transfer between fluidand solid and calculate the temperatures of fluids and solidsat the same time In this study we used the commercialsoftware Ansys CFX for numerical simulation CFX is acomputational fluid dynamics software package based on thecontrol volume method to solve NavierndashStokes equations Inthe fluid domain the mass conservation momentum andenergy transport equations are described as

zρf

zt+ nabla middot ρf uf1113872 1113873 0 (1)

zuf ρf

zt+ nabla middot ρf uf uf1113872 1113873 minus nablap + nabla middot τ (2)

zhtot ρf

zt+ nabla middot ρf uf htot1113872 1113873 nabla middot λf nablaT1113872 1113873 + nabla middot uf middot τ1113872 1113873

(3)

where uf ρf p τ λf T htot and t represent the velocityvector density pressure stress tensor thermal conductivitytemperature total enthalpy and time of the fluidrespectively

In a solid domain the conservation of energy equationcan explain the heat transfer caused by solid motion con-duction and a volume heat source e energy equation is

zhtot ρs

zt+ nabla middot ρs us htot( 1113857 nabla middot λsnablaT( 1113857 + SE (4)

where us is the velocity vector of the solid us uf SE is theoptional volume heat source SE nabla middot (us middot τ) ρs is the densityof the solid and λs is the thermal conductivity of the solid

is study did not directly solve (1)ndash(4) Instead theywere converted to the steady-state Reynolds averageNavierndashStokes method to calculate turbulence e fluidmedium (exhaust gas and air) is an ideal gas and the shearstress transmission (SST) turbulence model was used be-cause the SST turbulence model has good accuracy for CHTcalculations [20] at model has both the accuracy of thek minus ω model in high-pressure gradient flow boundary layerprediction and the stability of the k minus e model in mainstreamprediction [18]

22 Modal Part

221 Rotor-Shaft System Geometry emodel of the rotor-shaft system was provided by the turbocharger company andagreed with the real onee rotor-shaft system comprised a

turbine wheel a compressor wheel a rotating shaft afloating ring bearing a thrust bearing a seal sleeve and anut as Figure 4 shows e turbine wheel and shaft wereconnected by friction welding whereas the compressor wasaxially and circumferentially fixed by a left-hand nut

e materials of the main parts of the rotor-shaft systemare shown in Table 3 based on the actual situation

is study investigated the effect of temperature andfound that the material properties changed as the temper-ature changed e function curves of the material prop-erties of each part as a function of temperature are shown inFigure 5 [25 26]

Publication [29] proposes a set of damping coefficientsand we verified the influence of damping coefficients on thestability limit displacement of the rotor through theoreticalanalysis and numerical simulation We selected this set ofdamping coefficients based on the theory of the publication

Table 4 shows what we assumed was the materialdamping coefficient of each part of the rotor

222 Floating Ring Bearing Parameters e rotor shaft wassupported by a floating ring bearing whose detailed pa-rameters are shown in Table 5

To aid the simulation we combined the stiffness anddamping coefficients of the inner and outer oil film into atotal impedance (equivalent stiffness and damping coeffi-cients) according to [27 28] Combining the stiffness anddamping coefficients of the inner and outer oil film providedby the turbocharger company with the parameters of thefloating ring bearing we calculated the total impedanceusing Dyrobes rotor dynamics software (Dyrobes USA)Figure 6 shows the total impedance (equivalent stiffness anddamping coefficients) of the floating ring bearing at variousspeeds

223 Finite Element Model of Rotor is study used a large-scale general software Ansys Workbench for simulation Toobtain the motion trace on the axis the rotor shaft wasequally divided into four parts along the axis direction asshown in Figure 7 e blue lines (solid and dotted) in thefigure represent the division positions

e solid model was discretised and an Ansys Solid186element was used e Solid186 element is a high-order 3D20-node element with quadratic displacement characteris-tics e element is defined by 20 nodes each node withthree degrees of freedom (translation of each node in the x-y- and z-directions) e element supports plasticitysuperelasticity creep stress hardening large deflection andlarge strain capacity In the shaft part the grid was generatedby a sweep as shown in Figure 8 depicting the ldquoithrdquo elementafter segmentation

We transformed (deformed) the original hexahedronelement to an approximately one-quarter cylinder elementIn Figure 8 the red dotted line represents the actual edge ofthe element and the red solid line represents the edge of theelement e advantage of a solid model is that it retains theproperties of the original element and describes the outercontour of the shaft model well

4 Shock and Vibration

To adapt to the more complicated outer contour of theblade tetrahedral pyramid and prismmethods were used togenerate the unit in the blade and the remaining partFigure 9 shows the (i + 1) (i + 2) and (i + 3) elementsgenerated by three methods

e effects of rotational inertia translational inertia gyromoment support stiffness support damping materialdamping rotational damping and thermal stress stiffnesswere considered in the model to establish the equation ofmotion e rotor model was discretised into Ne elementsand the total number of nodes became a e node dis-placement vector of the ith element is

qe xiI yiI ziI xiJ yiJ ziJ xiμ yiμ ziμ xiA1113966

yiA ziA xiB yiB ziB1113865T

(5)

where μ I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W

X Y Z A B is the node number and the superscript T isthe matrixvector transpose ese writing formats are alsomentioned later in the text

After combining the governing equations of all elementsand combining the boundary conditions the equation ofmotion of the rotor-bearing system is

Meuroq (t) + C _q(t) + Kq (t) f (t) (6)

where M M trs + M rot C [minusΩG + Ccon + Cbrg] andK [Kbrg + Ksh + Ktem + Ktemσ]

HereM is a mass matrix that includes mass componentscaused by translation along the axis (Mtrs) and rotation alongthe axis (Mrot) C is a damping matrix (asymmetric matrixcoefficient of the velocity vector) that includes a skew-symmetric gyro matrix (G) a constant structural dampingmatrix (Ccon βKcon) with hysteresis characteristics causedby internal friction of the material and damping caused bythe floating ring bearing support matrix (Cbrg) K is thestiffness matrix (matrix coefficient of the displacementvector) that includes the stiffness matrix (Kbrg) caused by thesupport of the floating ring bearing the spin-softeningbending matrix (Ksh) generated by the rotor rotation thestiffness matrix (Ktem) of the elastic modulus the stiffnessmatrix (Ktemσ) caused by the nonuniform thermal stress andthermal deformation caused by temperature changes esize of all matrices is 3a times 3a Ω is the rotor speed in rpm βis the material damping (Rayleigh damping) stiffnessdamping coefficient

e total displacement and global force vectors q(t) andf(t) are expressed as

q (t)

x(t) a times 1

y (t) a times 1

z (t) a times 1

⎧⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎭3atimes1

x1 (t)x2 (t)x3 (t) x(aminus 1) (t) xa(t)1113960 1113961T

y1 (t) y2(t) y3 (t) y(aminus 1) (t)ya(t)1113960 1113961T

z1 (t) z2 (t) z3 (t) z(aminus 1) (t) za(t)1113960 1113961T

⎧⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎭

f (t)

fx (t) a times 1

fy (t) a times 1

fz (t)a times 1

⎧⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎭3atimes1

fx1 (t) fx2 (t)fx3 (t) fx(aminus 1)(t) fxa (t)1113960 1113961T

fy1 (t) fy2(t) fy3 (t) fy(aminus 1)(t) fya (t)1113960 1113961T

fz1 (t) fz2 (t) fz3 (t) fz(aminus 1) (t) fza (t)1113960 1113961T

⎧⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎭

(7)

Turbinewheel Floating rings

bearings

Rotating shirustbearing Seal

sleeve

Nut

Compressorwheel

YZ

X

ωRotor

Figure 4 Composition of the rotor-shaft system

Table 3 Material of the main part of the rotor-shaft system

Part name Material nameTurbo impeller K418Compressor impeller and nut ZL105Shaft 42CrMorust bearing and seal sleeve 316 stainless steel

Shock and Vibration 5

208

195

182

169

156

143

130

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

0 200 400 600Temperature (degC)

800 1000

028

027

026

025

024

023

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

Temperature (degC)

580

560

540

520

500

480

460

440Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)

420

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

24

22

20

18

16

14

12

10

0 200 400 600 800 1000

(a)

0 50 100 150 250 300 350200 400 450Temperature (degC)

The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

900

800

185

180

175

170

165

160

155

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

72

68

64

60

0 50 100 150 250 300200Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

10

05

00

ndash05

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

56

(b)

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

215

210

205

200

195

190

185

180

175

Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

033

032

030

031

029

028

027

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

0 100 300 400 500200Temperature (degC)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

) 1350

1200

1050

900

750

600

450 The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)40

36

32

28

24

20

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

0 200 600 800 1000400

(c)

Figure 5 Continued

6 Shock and Vibration

Writing (6) in state-space form yields

A _w(t) Bw(t) + F(t) (8)

where matrices A and B state vector w(t) and force vectorF(t) are

A 0 M

M C1113890 1113891

6atimes6a

B M 0

0 minusK1113890 1113891

6atimes6a

w(t) _q (t)

q (t)1113896 1113897

6atimes1F(t)

0

f(t)1113896 1113897

6atimes1

(9)

where 0 is an empty matrix of size 3a times 3a and an emptyvector of size 3a times 1

Figure 10 shows a simplified finite element model of therotor-shaft system e grey-blue points in the figure areused to observe the modal shapes line trajectories andunbalanced harmonic response analysis

Figure 11 shows the rotor finite element global grid etotal number of grids was 3176485 with 546067 gridnodes In the geometry software each portion of the rotorwas treated as a part to avoid extra contact stiffness in thefinite element simulation and prevent affecting the simu-lation accuracy

To aid the comparison we considered two cases in thisstudy case 1 the rotor-shaft system without the influence oftemperature and case 2 the rotor-shaft system affected bytemperature In the following sections r-th forward and r-thbackward modes are represented as ldquor-Frdquo and ldquor-Brdquo modesrespectively

3 Results and Discussion

31 Heat Transfer Results and Experimental VerificationAfter the calculation we verified the numerical results of themass flow and the supercharger ratio (expansion ratio) enumerical results agreed with the experimental data and theerror control was approximately 7 as Figure 12 shows

e temperature distribution of the rotor was obtainedthrough postprocessing as Figure 13 shows the temperaturedistribution law was the same as that in the Bohn [19] studyresult and is shown in Figure 14

Figures 13 and 14 show that the highest temperature wasat the outer edge of the turbine wheel blades and that thelowest temperature was at the compressor wheel Overallthe rotor had a large temperature gradient

32 Modal Results

321 Campbell Diagram and Stability Diagram of NormalTemperature Environment Figure 15 shows the Campbelldiagram of the rotor-shaft system in case 1 that iswithout considering the temperature e figure was

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

0 600 800 1000 1200400200Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

034

032

030

028

026

024

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

0 800 1000 1200 1400 1600400 600200Temperature (degC)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

800

750

700

650

600

550

500 The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)32

28

24

20

16

12

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

(d)

Figure 5 Material properties of rotor-shaft system as a function of temperature (Youngrsquos modulus Poisson ratio specific heat capacity andthermal conductivity) (a) K418 (b) ZL105 (c) 42CrMo (d) 316 stainless steel [25 26]

Table 4 Damping coefficient of each partPart name Damping coefficientTurbo impeller 0002Compressor impeller and nut 0001Shaft 0005rust bearing and seal sleeve 0005

Table 5 Parameters of floating ring bearing that supported therotor shaftParameter name Parameter valueFloating ring mass 517 gInner length 514mmOuter length 796mmInner diameter 750mmOuter diameter 129mm

Shock and Vibration 7

Y

Divide

Z

X

14 cylinder

Figure 7 Rotor shaft divided into four parts and 14 cylinder

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

ndash2000

ndash4000

ndash6000

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

ndash2

ndash4

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

(a)

3000

2000

1000

0

ndash1000

ndash2000

ndash3000

ndash4000

12

10

08

06

04

02

00

ndash02

ndash04

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

(b)

Figure 6 Total impedance of floating ring bearing (equivalent stiffness and damping coefficients) (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

8 Shock and Vibration

obtained from the whirl frequency (obtained from theimaginary part of the eigenvalue) and the rotational speedTo present a clear figure and express its basic

characteristics only the first four whirling directions aredescribed In the figure there are two forward whirls (thewhirl direction of the rotor agrees with the rotation

cyx cyx

cxy

cyy cyykyxkyx

kyy

kxxkxx kxycxx

cxy cxxkxy

kyy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Y

X Z

Figure 10 Finite element model of rotor-shaft system

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

IY

Z

X

V ON V

U A

RK X

S

M

YQ

I

O

W

P

B

LT

Z

JTransit (sweep)A

K

SX

R W

Figure 8 Solid186 element generated by the sweep method

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

I

V O

A

K

SX

R W

YZ

X

Transit (tetrahedral) (i + 1)

(i + 2)

(i + 3)

J K O N R AV Z

J K O N R A V Z

O N V

W U

P M XT

I

QY SK

BL

AR

P M X

W U

I

Q

Q

I

UM X

W

PB

L

SY

T

J Z

YS

T L B

Transit (pyramid)

Transit (prism)

Figure 9 Solid186 elements generated by tetrahedral pyramid and prism methods

Shock and Vibration 9

direction of the speed) which are marked as 1F and 2F inorder of increased frequency ere are also two backwardwhirls (the whirl direction of the rotor is opposite to therotation direction of the speed) that are marked as 3B and

4B respectively e synchronous whirl line is called thesynchronous excitation line In the figure the velocitiescorresponding to the intersection of the synchronouswhirl line and the frequency line of the forward whirl are

Temperature8177

Turbineside

Compressorside

(K)

7688

7199

6710

6222

5733

5244

4755

4266

3777

Figure 13 Postprocessing rotor temperature distribution

Figure 11 Global grid of rotor-shaft system

008

007

006

005

004

003

002

001

000

60000rpm

80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

ExperimentalCFD

(a)

014

012

010

008

006

004

002

000

60000rpm80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

10 11 12 13 14 1615 17

ExperimentalCFD

(b)

Figure 12 Numerical simulation verified by experiments (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

10 Shock and Vibration

Compressorside

Turbineside035 10

TToT times103 (K)

Figure 14 Rotor temperature distribution of Bohn [19]

times103

SWL (1X)

Normal temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 15 Campbell diagram showing whirl frequency and rotor-spin speed for the first four modes

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

Normal temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 16 Stability diagram of rotor-shaft system without considering temperature

Shock and Vibration 11

marked as Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 respectively and were calculatedas follows Ωcr1 5 0115 rpm and Ωcr2 43 622 rpmBecause the backward whirl could not be excited by theunbalanced force it is not marked or considered

When the speed was in the critical speed range be-tween Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in the 1F mode the whirling fre-quency had a clear increasing trend at trend may havebeen caused by floating ring bearings because in thecritical speed range of Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 the stiffness anddamping of the oil film changed sharply When the criticalspeed of Ωcr2 was exceeded the stiffness and damping ofthe oil film changed smoothly and the eddy frequency inthe corresponding 1F mode also increased at a constantrate

Figure 16 shows that the curve of the damping ratio ofthe four modes in case 1 changed with the rotation speede modal damping ratio is the ratio of actual damping tothe critical damping of a certain mode and the dampingratio is the decisive parameter to describe the stability Apositive damping ratio means that the rotor-shaft systemwas in a stable region when the vibration energy wasdissipated A negative damping ratio means that therotation energy supported the rotor rotation by addingvibration energy resulting in the rotor-shaft systembecoming unstable e point where the damping ratiocurve intersects with the zero line is the stable limit speed(SLS) e figure shows that the rotor-shaft system be-came unstable when SLS 1 56 550 rpm in 1F mode andthen became unstable when SLS 2 97 946 rpm in 2Fmode

Figure 17 shows the four modes close to the SLS 1stability limit speed at 55000 rpm e black dotted linerepresents the axis the combination of the orange line andthe orange sphere represents the starting position of thetrajectory and the incomplete track curve represents thewhirl direction e figure shows that the 1F mode wascylindrical thus combining rigid body motion with rotorbending Furthermore the rotor was close to the unstablestate at this time In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode e figure shows that the 3B mode wasconical with both rigid body motion and rotor bendingLastly the 4B mode was cylindrical with both rigid bodymotion and rotor bending

Figure 18 shows the four modes close to the SLS 2stability limit speed at 97946 rpme rotor was close to theunstable state at this time e 1F and 3B modes were cy-lindrical and conical combining rigid body motion androtor bending In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode

322 Effect of Temperature on the Campbell Diagram andStability Diagram We exported the temperature data ofeach node in Figure 12 and inserted the temperature valueinto the corresponding rotor-shaft system node through the

Ansys software commands functionWe analysed the criticalspeed and stability of the rotor-shaft system in the thermalenvironment

Figure 19 shows that temperature affected the intrinsicfrequency (whirl frequency) Compared with case 1 thewhirl-frequency curves in the 1F 2F and 3B modes wereslightly lower whereas for the 4B mode the whirl-fre-quency curve was much lower In the figure the startingpoint at the left end (when the rotating speed was 0 rpm)was taken as the observation object In case 1 the frequencywas 23009 Hz whereas in case 2 the frequency decreasedto 21825 Hz Because the temperature changed the ma-terialrsquos elastic modulus and Poissonrsquos ratio it affected itsstructural stiffness For higher-order frequencies the effecton frequency became greater as the order increasedHowever the effect on the critical speed Ωcr1 did notchange much whereas Ωcr2 decreased from 43622 rpm to41815 rpm is decrease was also caused by the intrinsicfrequency drop

Figure 20 shows the stability diagram in case 2 and thatthe temperature had an important effect on the dampingratio and SLS Compared with case 1 SLS 1 of the 1F modedecreased from the original 56550 rpm to 55078 rpm andmade the 1F mode enter the unstable region ahead of timee 2F mode change was more obvious and the same SLS 2decreased from the original 97946 rpm to 95969 rpm ereason for this can be explained by the following formulaξr (α2ωhr) + (βωhr2) Here ξr is the damping ratiocoefficient of the rth mode α is the mass damping coeffi-cient β is the stiffness damping coefficient and ωhr is thenatural frequency of the rth mode In most cases α (α 0)can be disregarded that is ξr βωhr2 β did not changewhereas ωhr decreased because of the effect of temperatureresulting in a decrease in ξr In other words SLS 1 and SLS 2in the 1F and 2F modes were reduced erefore whenpredicting the stability limit reset and dynamic perfor-mance of a turbocharger rotor the effect of temperatureshould have a great influence on the dynamic design of therotor

323 Unbalance Response Analysis We applied a dummyunbalance mass of 001 kg middot mm at node 2 and the fre-quency range of the steady-state synchronous responseanalysis was 0 to 2500Hz (corresponding speed range0 to 150 000 rpm) We then measured the response am-plitude of the turbine end floating ring bearing centerposition node 5 In Figure 21 case 1 is represented by ablack curve (normal temperature) and case 2 by a redcurve (high temperature) In case 1 (case 2) the curvesrepresent 6F 6B and 20F modes e frequency at thewave crest corresponding to the frequency correspondingto the fast reverse rotation (the frequency of the rotationspeed within one minute) in the case 1 (case 2) Campbelldiagram as shown in Figures 22 and 23) is similar to the

12 Shock and Vibration

black (red) number in Figure 20 Because the steeringmode is dominant in the response diagram the criticalspeeds Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in case 1 (case 2) 1F and 2F modesare not shown in the diagram and followed a phenom-enon similar to that reported by Chouksey and Roy[29 30] Because of the effect of temperature the steering

frequency of case 2 shifted to the left making the changeof response amplitude more obvious e responsevalue at the peak of the 6F and 6B modes decreased from0147mm to 0014 mm and that at the peak of the20F and 20B modes decreased from 0036 mm to00037 mm

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02

ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 17 Mode shapes at 55000 rpm (SLS 1) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

Shock and Vibration 13

324 Verification of Rotor FEM Natural frequency anal-ysis is very important as the basis of a dynamic analysisWe obtained the first two natural frequencies of the rotorby hammering experiments and verified them by nu-merical simulation Figure 24 shows the measured parts(rotor system) force hammer and piezoelectric acceler-ation sensor To reduce the measurement error rate we

adopted a sensor with a nonlinearity of less than 12 anda sensitivity of 10 mvg and placed the sensor in themiddle of the rotor shaft Table 6 compares the naturalfrequency experimental value with the simulated valuee experimental and simulated values of the first naturalfrequency were 1386Hz and 1453 Hz respectively esecond-order natural frequencies were 4100 Hz and

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

010203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash01

0001

0203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 18 Mode shapes at 97000 rpm (SLS 2) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

14 Shock and Vibration

4383 Hz respectively and the error rate was within 7But the higher mass of the accelerometer is the maincause of error value between the experimental value andthe simulated value

A more favorable verification was the oil film data shownin Figure 6e oil film data were experimental data providedby the turbocharger company In the simulation the oil filmwas the key factor in supporting or restraining the rotor isalso illustrates the reliability of the simulation method

times103

SWL (1X)

High temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 19 Effect of temperature on the Campbell diagram

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

High temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

Figure 20 Effect of temperature on stability diagram

5375Hz0036mm

8125Hz0147mm

Turbine side node 5X-direction

001

000500 1000

525Hz00037mm 7875Hz

0014mm

000

002

004

006

008

010

012

014

016

Am

plitu

de (m

m)

250 5000 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500Frequency (Hz)

Normal temperatureHigh temperature

Figure 21 Response comparison between case 1 and case 2 of theturbine side floating ring bearing center position (node 5)

Shock and Vibration 15

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 2: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

Montagnier [7] used EulerndashBernoulli shaft model to analysethe critical speed of a flexible internal resistance rotorsupported by elastic bearings to obtain the stable workingrange of the rotor ey found that most of the rotor in-stability was caused by the internal damping of the materialIncreasing the bearing damping could make the rotor runmore stably and they established a rotor instability analysismodel that included the internal resistance of the materialVitta [8] used linear and nonlinear evaluation methods toanalyse the effect of internal damping on the dynamic be-haviour of a shaft e results show that the critical sub-critical and stable limit speeds of a rotor can be obtained bylinear evaluation Newkirk [9] studied internal damping andfound that a rotor may vibrate violently at a speed higherthan the first critical speed Genta [10] explained that thehysteretic damping of rotating structures is stable in thesubcritical range but unstable in the supercritical range Allthose researchers proved that the instability speed is higherthan the first-order critical speed when considering thehysteretic damping of rotating structures Also many re-searchers have studied the combined effects of materialdamping and bearing damping e results show that in-creasing the bearing damping can improve the stability ofthe rotor but increasing the material damping can reducethe instability threshold [6]

e effect of the surrounding temperature on materialdamping of a turbocharger rotor cannot be disregarded inhigh-temperature environments It is very important tounderstand the dynamic behaviours of the structure invarious temperatures when designing a rotor to operate inthermal extremes San [11] established a nonlinear rotor-bearing finite element model e model considered thethermal effects of lubricating oil and the thermal expansionsof the rotor shaft and bearing and San Andres analysed thenatural frequency stability and unbalanced response of therotor e results show that the natural frequency andsynchronous speed amplitude obtained by the simulationwere completely consistent with the experimental valueswhich verified the feasibility of the finite element modelZych [12] used a finite element method to calculate thethermal stress of a radial axial microturbine in a high-temperature environment In the calculation they consid-ered the mass of the disc the rotation speed of the rotor andthe complex shape at the rear of the disc eir work showedthat numerical calculation helps to choose the best opti-mization method and they reduced the turbinersquos von Misesstress by approximately 45 Jeyaraj [13] uniformly heated athin plate that incorporated various internal dampingcomposite materials and did free vibration and forced vi-bration analyses e study found that with increasingtemperature the vibration amplitude (response) of the thinplate structure decreased but the modal loss factor increasedsignificantly with increasing temperature thereby reducingthe vibration amplitude Its response frequency also de-creased with increasing temperature Guo [14] did thermalvibration analysis of a rotating beam structure with con-strained layer damping e study found that as the tem-perature increased the modal frequency of the beamstructure decreased accordingly and the damping ratio

increased accordingly at study provides a basis for dy-namic analysis of high-speed rotating blades in variousthermal environments However the number of articles onthis subject is limited

erefore this research studied the dynamic characteristicsof internal material damping and an oil film force turbochargerrotor-bearing system under thermal environments (tempera-ture fields)We used the conjugate heat transfer (CHT)methodto simulate the temperature field of the solid part of a rotor-shaft system e temperature field was coupled with the finiteelement model of the rotor compared with the instancewithout considering the temperature field e rotor finiteelement is verified by experiment

2 Numerical Model and Research Methods

21 Fluid and Heat Transfer Sections Before the thermalmodal analysis the aerodynamic thermal analysis wasperformed e current industry standard modelling ap-proaches assume the turbine and compressor operate underadiabatic conditions [15] e CHT simulation method[16ndash22] is used to obtain the temperature distribution of therotor and the node temperature is provided for the modalsimulation part

211 Turbocharge and Compressor Geometry e turbo-charger had an impeller with 10 blades and the compressorhad an impeller with 6 blades and 6 splitters e turbo-charger and compressor parameters are shown in Table 1 Toimprove the accuracy of the calculations we modelled boththe turbocharger and the compressor using full passagesesolid parts and the air flow are shown in Figure 1

212 Grid Generation CHT involves the direct coupling offluids and solids ICEM grid discretisation software (AnsysInc USA) uses the same numerical principles and griddiscretisation for both regions is allows the non-interpolated exchange of heat flux between adjacent grids[23] e calculation accuracy of CHT is very sensitive to theresolution of the fluid boundary layer grid erefore thedimensionless distance y+ 1 or less (in this paper y+ 1)of the wall distance of the first layer of the grid can determinethe local heat flux with enough accuracy As shown inFigures 2 and 3 the fluid domain solid domain (rotorimpeller) and boundary layer grid were generated for CHTcalculations e total number of global grids was12329631 with 2067903 global grid nodes Following theshape of the outer contour of the rotor we used a triangulartetrahedral mesh with good adaptability to the outer con-tour and we used smoothing to optimize the mesh eimpeller grid and the fluid grid were connected in a generalgrid interface mode in Ansys CFX software

213 Boundary Conditions We determined the boundaryconditions for aerodynamic thermal analysis using experi-mental data provided by the turbocharger company theboundary conditions are shown in Table 2

2 Shock and Vibration

Table 1 Turbocharger and compressor parameters

Turbine side Compressor sideParameters Value and units Parameters Value and unitsBlades number 10 Blades number 6 + 6 (minus)Impeller inlet diameter 5505mm Impeller outlet diameter 565mmTip clearance 041mm Tip clearance 026mm

Turbineside

Solid casing Solid casingInlet

Inlet

Outlet

Impeller Impeller

Sha

Compressorside

Outlet

Figure 1 Centrifugal turbocharger and compressor with a solid casing

Figure 2 Global grid for conjugate heat transfer calculation

Turbinefluid

Turbineimpeller

Compressorfluid Compressor

impeller

Figure 3 Computational grids for conjugate heat transfer calculation

Table 2 e boundary conditions for aerothermal analysis

Turbine side Compressor sideMedium (intensity 5) Medium (intensity 5)Inlet mass flow 0074 kgs Inlet total pressure 999359 PaInlet total temperature 87297K Inlet total temperature 297201 KOutlet static pressure 968927 Pa Outlet static pressure 127578 Pa

Shock and Vibration 3

e heat transfer of the surrounding air was disregardedand the out-wall of the turbocharger was assumed to beadiabatic We applied ldquono-sliprdquo boundary conditions to allinner walls An interface was added between the rotatingdomain and the fixed domain and the interface was con-nected by a ldquofrozen rotorrdquo [24]

214 Numerical Methodology CHTrefers to a coupled heattransfer phenomenon in which the thermal properties of twomaterials occur through a medium or in direct contact eCHT method can calculate the heat transfer between fluidand solid and calculate the temperatures of fluids and solidsat the same time In this study we used the commercialsoftware Ansys CFX for numerical simulation CFX is acomputational fluid dynamics software package based on thecontrol volume method to solve NavierndashStokes equations Inthe fluid domain the mass conservation momentum andenergy transport equations are described as

zρf

zt+ nabla middot ρf uf1113872 1113873 0 (1)

zuf ρf

zt+ nabla middot ρf uf uf1113872 1113873 minus nablap + nabla middot τ (2)

zhtot ρf

zt+ nabla middot ρf uf htot1113872 1113873 nabla middot λf nablaT1113872 1113873 + nabla middot uf middot τ1113872 1113873

(3)

where uf ρf p τ λf T htot and t represent the velocityvector density pressure stress tensor thermal conductivitytemperature total enthalpy and time of the fluidrespectively

In a solid domain the conservation of energy equationcan explain the heat transfer caused by solid motion con-duction and a volume heat source e energy equation is

zhtot ρs

zt+ nabla middot ρs us htot( 1113857 nabla middot λsnablaT( 1113857 + SE (4)

where us is the velocity vector of the solid us uf SE is theoptional volume heat source SE nabla middot (us middot τ) ρs is the densityof the solid and λs is the thermal conductivity of the solid

is study did not directly solve (1)ndash(4) Instead theywere converted to the steady-state Reynolds averageNavierndashStokes method to calculate turbulence e fluidmedium (exhaust gas and air) is an ideal gas and the shearstress transmission (SST) turbulence model was used be-cause the SST turbulence model has good accuracy for CHTcalculations [20] at model has both the accuracy of thek minus ω model in high-pressure gradient flow boundary layerprediction and the stability of the k minus e model in mainstreamprediction [18]

22 Modal Part

221 Rotor-Shaft System Geometry emodel of the rotor-shaft system was provided by the turbocharger company andagreed with the real onee rotor-shaft system comprised a

turbine wheel a compressor wheel a rotating shaft afloating ring bearing a thrust bearing a seal sleeve and anut as Figure 4 shows e turbine wheel and shaft wereconnected by friction welding whereas the compressor wasaxially and circumferentially fixed by a left-hand nut

e materials of the main parts of the rotor-shaft systemare shown in Table 3 based on the actual situation

is study investigated the effect of temperature andfound that the material properties changed as the temper-ature changed e function curves of the material prop-erties of each part as a function of temperature are shown inFigure 5 [25 26]

Publication [29] proposes a set of damping coefficientsand we verified the influence of damping coefficients on thestability limit displacement of the rotor through theoreticalanalysis and numerical simulation We selected this set ofdamping coefficients based on the theory of the publication

Table 4 shows what we assumed was the materialdamping coefficient of each part of the rotor

222 Floating Ring Bearing Parameters e rotor shaft wassupported by a floating ring bearing whose detailed pa-rameters are shown in Table 5

To aid the simulation we combined the stiffness anddamping coefficients of the inner and outer oil film into atotal impedance (equivalent stiffness and damping coeffi-cients) according to [27 28] Combining the stiffness anddamping coefficients of the inner and outer oil film providedby the turbocharger company with the parameters of thefloating ring bearing we calculated the total impedanceusing Dyrobes rotor dynamics software (Dyrobes USA)Figure 6 shows the total impedance (equivalent stiffness anddamping coefficients) of the floating ring bearing at variousspeeds

223 Finite Element Model of Rotor is study used a large-scale general software Ansys Workbench for simulation Toobtain the motion trace on the axis the rotor shaft wasequally divided into four parts along the axis direction asshown in Figure 7 e blue lines (solid and dotted) in thefigure represent the division positions

e solid model was discretised and an Ansys Solid186element was used e Solid186 element is a high-order 3D20-node element with quadratic displacement characteris-tics e element is defined by 20 nodes each node withthree degrees of freedom (translation of each node in the x-y- and z-directions) e element supports plasticitysuperelasticity creep stress hardening large deflection andlarge strain capacity In the shaft part the grid was generatedby a sweep as shown in Figure 8 depicting the ldquoithrdquo elementafter segmentation

We transformed (deformed) the original hexahedronelement to an approximately one-quarter cylinder elementIn Figure 8 the red dotted line represents the actual edge ofthe element and the red solid line represents the edge of theelement e advantage of a solid model is that it retains theproperties of the original element and describes the outercontour of the shaft model well

4 Shock and Vibration

To adapt to the more complicated outer contour of theblade tetrahedral pyramid and prismmethods were used togenerate the unit in the blade and the remaining partFigure 9 shows the (i + 1) (i + 2) and (i + 3) elementsgenerated by three methods

e effects of rotational inertia translational inertia gyromoment support stiffness support damping materialdamping rotational damping and thermal stress stiffnesswere considered in the model to establish the equation ofmotion e rotor model was discretised into Ne elementsand the total number of nodes became a e node dis-placement vector of the ith element is

qe xiI yiI ziI xiJ yiJ ziJ xiμ yiμ ziμ xiA1113966

yiA ziA xiB yiB ziB1113865T

(5)

where μ I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W

X Y Z A B is the node number and the superscript T isthe matrixvector transpose ese writing formats are alsomentioned later in the text

After combining the governing equations of all elementsand combining the boundary conditions the equation ofmotion of the rotor-bearing system is

Meuroq (t) + C _q(t) + Kq (t) f (t) (6)

where M M trs + M rot C [minusΩG + Ccon + Cbrg] andK [Kbrg + Ksh + Ktem + Ktemσ]

HereM is a mass matrix that includes mass componentscaused by translation along the axis (Mtrs) and rotation alongthe axis (Mrot) C is a damping matrix (asymmetric matrixcoefficient of the velocity vector) that includes a skew-symmetric gyro matrix (G) a constant structural dampingmatrix (Ccon βKcon) with hysteresis characteristics causedby internal friction of the material and damping caused bythe floating ring bearing support matrix (Cbrg) K is thestiffness matrix (matrix coefficient of the displacementvector) that includes the stiffness matrix (Kbrg) caused by thesupport of the floating ring bearing the spin-softeningbending matrix (Ksh) generated by the rotor rotation thestiffness matrix (Ktem) of the elastic modulus the stiffnessmatrix (Ktemσ) caused by the nonuniform thermal stress andthermal deformation caused by temperature changes esize of all matrices is 3a times 3a Ω is the rotor speed in rpm βis the material damping (Rayleigh damping) stiffnessdamping coefficient

e total displacement and global force vectors q(t) andf(t) are expressed as

q (t)

x(t) a times 1

y (t) a times 1

z (t) a times 1

⎧⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎭3atimes1

x1 (t)x2 (t)x3 (t) x(aminus 1) (t) xa(t)1113960 1113961T

y1 (t) y2(t) y3 (t) y(aminus 1) (t)ya(t)1113960 1113961T

z1 (t) z2 (t) z3 (t) z(aminus 1) (t) za(t)1113960 1113961T

⎧⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎭

f (t)

fx (t) a times 1

fy (t) a times 1

fz (t)a times 1

⎧⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎭3atimes1

fx1 (t) fx2 (t)fx3 (t) fx(aminus 1)(t) fxa (t)1113960 1113961T

fy1 (t) fy2(t) fy3 (t) fy(aminus 1)(t) fya (t)1113960 1113961T

fz1 (t) fz2 (t) fz3 (t) fz(aminus 1) (t) fza (t)1113960 1113961T

⎧⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎭

(7)

Turbinewheel Floating rings

bearings

Rotating shirustbearing Seal

sleeve

Nut

Compressorwheel

YZ

X

ωRotor

Figure 4 Composition of the rotor-shaft system

Table 3 Material of the main part of the rotor-shaft system

Part name Material nameTurbo impeller K418Compressor impeller and nut ZL105Shaft 42CrMorust bearing and seal sleeve 316 stainless steel

Shock and Vibration 5

208

195

182

169

156

143

130

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

0 200 400 600Temperature (degC)

800 1000

028

027

026

025

024

023

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

Temperature (degC)

580

560

540

520

500

480

460

440Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)

420

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

24

22

20

18

16

14

12

10

0 200 400 600 800 1000

(a)

0 50 100 150 250 300 350200 400 450Temperature (degC)

The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

900

800

185

180

175

170

165

160

155

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

72

68

64

60

0 50 100 150 250 300200Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

10

05

00

ndash05

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

56

(b)

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

215

210

205

200

195

190

185

180

175

Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

033

032

030

031

029

028

027

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

0 100 300 400 500200Temperature (degC)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

) 1350

1200

1050

900

750

600

450 The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)40

36

32

28

24

20

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

0 200 600 800 1000400

(c)

Figure 5 Continued

6 Shock and Vibration

Writing (6) in state-space form yields

A _w(t) Bw(t) + F(t) (8)

where matrices A and B state vector w(t) and force vectorF(t) are

A 0 M

M C1113890 1113891

6atimes6a

B M 0

0 minusK1113890 1113891

6atimes6a

w(t) _q (t)

q (t)1113896 1113897

6atimes1F(t)

0

f(t)1113896 1113897

6atimes1

(9)

where 0 is an empty matrix of size 3a times 3a and an emptyvector of size 3a times 1

Figure 10 shows a simplified finite element model of therotor-shaft system e grey-blue points in the figure areused to observe the modal shapes line trajectories andunbalanced harmonic response analysis

Figure 11 shows the rotor finite element global grid etotal number of grids was 3176485 with 546067 gridnodes In the geometry software each portion of the rotorwas treated as a part to avoid extra contact stiffness in thefinite element simulation and prevent affecting the simu-lation accuracy

To aid the comparison we considered two cases in thisstudy case 1 the rotor-shaft system without the influence oftemperature and case 2 the rotor-shaft system affected bytemperature In the following sections r-th forward and r-thbackward modes are represented as ldquor-Frdquo and ldquor-Brdquo modesrespectively

3 Results and Discussion

31 Heat Transfer Results and Experimental VerificationAfter the calculation we verified the numerical results of themass flow and the supercharger ratio (expansion ratio) enumerical results agreed with the experimental data and theerror control was approximately 7 as Figure 12 shows

e temperature distribution of the rotor was obtainedthrough postprocessing as Figure 13 shows the temperaturedistribution law was the same as that in the Bohn [19] studyresult and is shown in Figure 14

Figures 13 and 14 show that the highest temperature wasat the outer edge of the turbine wheel blades and that thelowest temperature was at the compressor wheel Overallthe rotor had a large temperature gradient

32 Modal Results

321 Campbell Diagram and Stability Diagram of NormalTemperature Environment Figure 15 shows the Campbelldiagram of the rotor-shaft system in case 1 that iswithout considering the temperature e figure was

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

0 600 800 1000 1200400200Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

034

032

030

028

026

024

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

0 800 1000 1200 1400 1600400 600200Temperature (degC)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

800

750

700

650

600

550

500 The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)32

28

24

20

16

12

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

(d)

Figure 5 Material properties of rotor-shaft system as a function of temperature (Youngrsquos modulus Poisson ratio specific heat capacity andthermal conductivity) (a) K418 (b) ZL105 (c) 42CrMo (d) 316 stainless steel [25 26]

Table 4 Damping coefficient of each partPart name Damping coefficientTurbo impeller 0002Compressor impeller and nut 0001Shaft 0005rust bearing and seal sleeve 0005

Table 5 Parameters of floating ring bearing that supported therotor shaftParameter name Parameter valueFloating ring mass 517 gInner length 514mmOuter length 796mmInner diameter 750mmOuter diameter 129mm

Shock and Vibration 7

Y

Divide

Z

X

14 cylinder

Figure 7 Rotor shaft divided into four parts and 14 cylinder

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

ndash2000

ndash4000

ndash6000

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

ndash2

ndash4

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

(a)

3000

2000

1000

0

ndash1000

ndash2000

ndash3000

ndash4000

12

10

08

06

04

02

00

ndash02

ndash04

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

(b)

Figure 6 Total impedance of floating ring bearing (equivalent stiffness and damping coefficients) (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

8 Shock and Vibration

obtained from the whirl frequency (obtained from theimaginary part of the eigenvalue) and the rotational speedTo present a clear figure and express its basic

characteristics only the first four whirling directions aredescribed In the figure there are two forward whirls (thewhirl direction of the rotor agrees with the rotation

cyx cyx

cxy

cyy cyykyxkyx

kyy

kxxkxx kxycxx

cxy cxxkxy

kyy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Y

X Z

Figure 10 Finite element model of rotor-shaft system

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

IY

Z

X

V ON V

U A

RK X

S

M

YQ

I

O

W

P

B

LT

Z

JTransit (sweep)A

K

SX

R W

Figure 8 Solid186 element generated by the sweep method

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

I

V O

A

K

SX

R W

YZ

X

Transit (tetrahedral) (i + 1)

(i + 2)

(i + 3)

J K O N R AV Z

J K O N R A V Z

O N V

W U

P M XT

I

QY SK

BL

AR

P M X

W U

I

Q

Q

I

UM X

W

PB

L

SY

T

J Z

YS

T L B

Transit (pyramid)

Transit (prism)

Figure 9 Solid186 elements generated by tetrahedral pyramid and prism methods

Shock and Vibration 9

direction of the speed) which are marked as 1F and 2F inorder of increased frequency ere are also two backwardwhirls (the whirl direction of the rotor is opposite to therotation direction of the speed) that are marked as 3B and

4B respectively e synchronous whirl line is called thesynchronous excitation line In the figure the velocitiescorresponding to the intersection of the synchronouswhirl line and the frequency line of the forward whirl are

Temperature8177

Turbineside

Compressorside

(K)

7688

7199

6710

6222

5733

5244

4755

4266

3777

Figure 13 Postprocessing rotor temperature distribution

Figure 11 Global grid of rotor-shaft system

008

007

006

005

004

003

002

001

000

60000rpm

80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

ExperimentalCFD

(a)

014

012

010

008

006

004

002

000

60000rpm80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

10 11 12 13 14 1615 17

ExperimentalCFD

(b)

Figure 12 Numerical simulation verified by experiments (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

10 Shock and Vibration

Compressorside

Turbineside035 10

TToT times103 (K)

Figure 14 Rotor temperature distribution of Bohn [19]

times103

SWL (1X)

Normal temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 15 Campbell diagram showing whirl frequency and rotor-spin speed for the first four modes

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

Normal temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 16 Stability diagram of rotor-shaft system without considering temperature

Shock and Vibration 11

marked as Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 respectively and were calculatedas follows Ωcr1 5 0115 rpm and Ωcr2 43 622 rpmBecause the backward whirl could not be excited by theunbalanced force it is not marked or considered

When the speed was in the critical speed range be-tween Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in the 1F mode the whirling fre-quency had a clear increasing trend at trend may havebeen caused by floating ring bearings because in thecritical speed range of Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 the stiffness anddamping of the oil film changed sharply When the criticalspeed of Ωcr2 was exceeded the stiffness and damping ofthe oil film changed smoothly and the eddy frequency inthe corresponding 1F mode also increased at a constantrate

Figure 16 shows that the curve of the damping ratio ofthe four modes in case 1 changed with the rotation speede modal damping ratio is the ratio of actual damping tothe critical damping of a certain mode and the dampingratio is the decisive parameter to describe the stability Apositive damping ratio means that the rotor-shaft systemwas in a stable region when the vibration energy wasdissipated A negative damping ratio means that therotation energy supported the rotor rotation by addingvibration energy resulting in the rotor-shaft systembecoming unstable e point where the damping ratiocurve intersects with the zero line is the stable limit speed(SLS) e figure shows that the rotor-shaft system be-came unstable when SLS 1 56 550 rpm in 1F mode andthen became unstable when SLS 2 97 946 rpm in 2Fmode

Figure 17 shows the four modes close to the SLS 1stability limit speed at 55000 rpm e black dotted linerepresents the axis the combination of the orange line andthe orange sphere represents the starting position of thetrajectory and the incomplete track curve represents thewhirl direction e figure shows that the 1F mode wascylindrical thus combining rigid body motion with rotorbending Furthermore the rotor was close to the unstablestate at this time In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode e figure shows that the 3B mode wasconical with both rigid body motion and rotor bendingLastly the 4B mode was cylindrical with both rigid bodymotion and rotor bending

Figure 18 shows the four modes close to the SLS 2stability limit speed at 97946 rpme rotor was close to theunstable state at this time e 1F and 3B modes were cy-lindrical and conical combining rigid body motion androtor bending In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode

322 Effect of Temperature on the Campbell Diagram andStability Diagram We exported the temperature data ofeach node in Figure 12 and inserted the temperature valueinto the corresponding rotor-shaft system node through the

Ansys software commands functionWe analysed the criticalspeed and stability of the rotor-shaft system in the thermalenvironment

Figure 19 shows that temperature affected the intrinsicfrequency (whirl frequency) Compared with case 1 thewhirl-frequency curves in the 1F 2F and 3B modes wereslightly lower whereas for the 4B mode the whirl-fre-quency curve was much lower In the figure the startingpoint at the left end (when the rotating speed was 0 rpm)was taken as the observation object In case 1 the frequencywas 23009 Hz whereas in case 2 the frequency decreasedto 21825 Hz Because the temperature changed the ma-terialrsquos elastic modulus and Poissonrsquos ratio it affected itsstructural stiffness For higher-order frequencies the effecton frequency became greater as the order increasedHowever the effect on the critical speed Ωcr1 did notchange much whereas Ωcr2 decreased from 43622 rpm to41815 rpm is decrease was also caused by the intrinsicfrequency drop

Figure 20 shows the stability diagram in case 2 and thatthe temperature had an important effect on the dampingratio and SLS Compared with case 1 SLS 1 of the 1F modedecreased from the original 56550 rpm to 55078 rpm andmade the 1F mode enter the unstable region ahead of timee 2F mode change was more obvious and the same SLS 2decreased from the original 97946 rpm to 95969 rpm ereason for this can be explained by the following formulaξr (α2ωhr) + (βωhr2) Here ξr is the damping ratiocoefficient of the rth mode α is the mass damping coeffi-cient β is the stiffness damping coefficient and ωhr is thenatural frequency of the rth mode In most cases α (α 0)can be disregarded that is ξr βωhr2 β did not changewhereas ωhr decreased because of the effect of temperatureresulting in a decrease in ξr In other words SLS 1 and SLS 2in the 1F and 2F modes were reduced erefore whenpredicting the stability limit reset and dynamic perfor-mance of a turbocharger rotor the effect of temperatureshould have a great influence on the dynamic design of therotor

323 Unbalance Response Analysis We applied a dummyunbalance mass of 001 kg middot mm at node 2 and the fre-quency range of the steady-state synchronous responseanalysis was 0 to 2500Hz (corresponding speed range0 to 150 000 rpm) We then measured the response am-plitude of the turbine end floating ring bearing centerposition node 5 In Figure 21 case 1 is represented by ablack curve (normal temperature) and case 2 by a redcurve (high temperature) In case 1 (case 2) the curvesrepresent 6F 6B and 20F modes e frequency at thewave crest corresponding to the frequency correspondingto the fast reverse rotation (the frequency of the rotationspeed within one minute) in the case 1 (case 2) Campbelldiagram as shown in Figures 22 and 23) is similar to the

12 Shock and Vibration

black (red) number in Figure 20 Because the steeringmode is dominant in the response diagram the criticalspeeds Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in case 1 (case 2) 1F and 2F modesare not shown in the diagram and followed a phenom-enon similar to that reported by Chouksey and Roy[29 30] Because of the effect of temperature the steering

frequency of case 2 shifted to the left making the changeof response amplitude more obvious e responsevalue at the peak of the 6F and 6B modes decreased from0147mm to 0014 mm and that at the peak of the20F and 20B modes decreased from 0036 mm to00037 mm

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02

ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 17 Mode shapes at 55000 rpm (SLS 1) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

Shock and Vibration 13

324 Verification of Rotor FEM Natural frequency anal-ysis is very important as the basis of a dynamic analysisWe obtained the first two natural frequencies of the rotorby hammering experiments and verified them by nu-merical simulation Figure 24 shows the measured parts(rotor system) force hammer and piezoelectric acceler-ation sensor To reduce the measurement error rate we

adopted a sensor with a nonlinearity of less than 12 anda sensitivity of 10 mvg and placed the sensor in themiddle of the rotor shaft Table 6 compares the naturalfrequency experimental value with the simulated valuee experimental and simulated values of the first naturalfrequency were 1386Hz and 1453 Hz respectively esecond-order natural frequencies were 4100 Hz and

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

010203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash01

0001

0203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 18 Mode shapes at 97000 rpm (SLS 2) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

14 Shock and Vibration

4383 Hz respectively and the error rate was within 7But the higher mass of the accelerometer is the maincause of error value between the experimental value andthe simulated value

A more favorable verification was the oil film data shownin Figure 6e oil film data were experimental data providedby the turbocharger company In the simulation the oil filmwas the key factor in supporting or restraining the rotor isalso illustrates the reliability of the simulation method

times103

SWL (1X)

High temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 19 Effect of temperature on the Campbell diagram

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

High temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

Figure 20 Effect of temperature on stability diagram

5375Hz0036mm

8125Hz0147mm

Turbine side node 5X-direction

001

000500 1000

525Hz00037mm 7875Hz

0014mm

000

002

004

006

008

010

012

014

016

Am

plitu

de (m

m)

250 5000 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500Frequency (Hz)

Normal temperatureHigh temperature

Figure 21 Response comparison between case 1 and case 2 of theturbine side floating ring bearing center position (node 5)

Shock and Vibration 15

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 3: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

Table 1 Turbocharger and compressor parameters

Turbine side Compressor sideParameters Value and units Parameters Value and unitsBlades number 10 Blades number 6 + 6 (minus)Impeller inlet diameter 5505mm Impeller outlet diameter 565mmTip clearance 041mm Tip clearance 026mm

Turbineside

Solid casing Solid casingInlet

Inlet

Outlet

Impeller Impeller

Sha

Compressorside

Outlet

Figure 1 Centrifugal turbocharger and compressor with a solid casing

Figure 2 Global grid for conjugate heat transfer calculation

Turbinefluid

Turbineimpeller

Compressorfluid Compressor

impeller

Figure 3 Computational grids for conjugate heat transfer calculation

Table 2 e boundary conditions for aerothermal analysis

Turbine side Compressor sideMedium (intensity 5) Medium (intensity 5)Inlet mass flow 0074 kgs Inlet total pressure 999359 PaInlet total temperature 87297K Inlet total temperature 297201 KOutlet static pressure 968927 Pa Outlet static pressure 127578 Pa

Shock and Vibration 3

e heat transfer of the surrounding air was disregardedand the out-wall of the turbocharger was assumed to beadiabatic We applied ldquono-sliprdquo boundary conditions to allinner walls An interface was added between the rotatingdomain and the fixed domain and the interface was con-nected by a ldquofrozen rotorrdquo [24]

214 Numerical Methodology CHTrefers to a coupled heattransfer phenomenon in which the thermal properties of twomaterials occur through a medium or in direct contact eCHT method can calculate the heat transfer between fluidand solid and calculate the temperatures of fluids and solidsat the same time In this study we used the commercialsoftware Ansys CFX for numerical simulation CFX is acomputational fluid dynamics software package based on thecontrol volume method to solve NavierndashStokes equations Inthe fluid domain the mass conservation momentum andenergy transport equations are described as

zρf

zt+ nabla middot ρf uf1113872 1113873 0 (1)

zuf ρf

zt+ nabla middot ρf uf uf1113872 1113873 minus nablap + nabla middot τ (2)

zhtot ρf

zt+ nabla middot ρf uf htot1113872 1113873 nabla middot λf nablaT1113872 1113873 + nabla middot uf middot τ1113872 1113873

(3)

where uf ρf p τ λf T htot and t represent the velocityvector density pressure stress tensor thermal conductivitytemperature total enthalpy and time of the fluidrespectively

In a solid domain the conservation of energy equationcan explain the heat transfer caused by solid motion con-duction and a volume heat source e energy equation is

zhtot ρs

zt+ nabla middot ρs us htot( 1113857 nabla middot λsnablaT( 1113857 + SE (4)

where us is the velocity vector of the solid us uf SE is theoptional volume heat source SE nabla middot (us middot τ) ρs is the densityof the solid and λs is the thermal conductivity of the solid

is study did not directly solve (1)ndash(4) Instead theywere converted to the steady-state Reynolds averageNavierndashStokes method to calculate turbulence e fluidmedium (exhaust gas and air) is an ideal gas and the shearstress transmission (SST) turbulence model was used be-cause the SST turbulence model has good accuracy for CHTcalculations [20] at model has both the accuracy of thek minus ω model in high-pressure gradient flow boundary layerprediction and the stability of the k minus e model in mainstreamprediction [18]

22 Modal Part

221 Rotor-Shaft System Geometry emodel of the rotor-shaft system was provided by the turbocharger company andagreed with the real onee rotor-shaft system comprised a

turbine wheel a compressor wheel a rotating shaft afloating ring bearing a thrust bearing a seal sleeve and anut as Figure 4 shows e turbine wheel and shaft wereconnected by friction welding whereas the compressor wasaxially and circumferentially fixed by a left-hand nut

e materials of the main parts of the rotor-shaft systemare shown in Table 3 based on the actual situation

is study investigated the effect of temperature andfound that the material properties changed as the temper-ature changed e function curves of the material prop-erties of each part as a function of temperature are shown inFigure 5 [25 26]

Publication [29] proposes a set of damping coefficientsand we verified the influence of damping coefficients on thestability limit displacement of the rotor through theoreticalanalysis and numerical simulation We selected this set ofdamping coefficients based on the theory of the publication

Table 4 shows what we assumed was the materialdamping coefficient of each part of the rotor

222 Floating Ring Bearing Parameters e rotor shaft wassupported by a floating ring bearing whose detailed pa-rameters are shown in Table 5

To aid the simulation we combined the stiffness anddamping coefficients of the inner and outer oil film into atotal impedance (equivalent stiffness and damping coeffi-cients) according to [27 28] Combining the stiffness anddamping coefficients of the inner and outer oil film providedby the turbocharger company with the parameters of thefloating ring bearing we calculated the total impedanceusing Dyrobes rotor dynamics software (Dyrobes USA)Figure 6 shows the total impedance (equivalent stiffness anddamping coefficients) of the floating ring bearing at variousspeeds

223 Finite Element Model of Rotor is study used a large-scale general software Ansys Workbench for simulation Toobtain the motion trace on the axis the rotor shaft wasequally divided into four parts along the axis direction asshown in Figure 7 e blue lines (solid and dotted) in thefigure represent the division positions

e solid model was discretised and an Ansys Solid186element was used e Solid186 element is a high-order 3D20-node element with quadratic displacement characteris-tics e element is defined by 20 nodes each node withthree degrees of freedom (translation of each node in the x-y- and z-directions) e element supports plasticitysuperelasticity creep stress hardening large deflection andlarge strain capacity In the shaft part the grid was generatedby a sweep as shown in Figure 8 depicting the ldquoithrdquo elementafter segmentation

We transformed (deformed) the original hexahedronelement to an approximately one-quarter cylinder elementIn Figure 8 the red dotted line represents the actual edge ofthe element and the red solid line represents the edge of theelement e advantage of a solid model is that it retains theproperties of the original element and describes the outercontour of the shaft model well

4 Shock and Vibration

To adapt to the more complicated outer contour of theblade tetrahedral pyramid and prismmethods were used togenerate the unit in the blade and the remaining partFigure 9 shows the (i + 1) (i + 2) and (i + 3) elementsgenerated by three methods

e effects of rotational inertia translational inertia gyromoment support stiffness support damping materialdamping rotational damping and thermal stress stiffnesswere considered in the model to establish the equation ofmotion e rotor model was discretised into Ne elementsand the total number of nodes became a e node dis-placement vector of the ith element is

qe xiI yiI ziI xiJ yiJ ziJ xiμ yiμ ziμ xiA1113966

yiA ziA xiB yiB ziB1113865T

(5)

where μ I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W

X Y Z A B is the node number and the superscript T isthe matrixvector transpose ese writing formats are alsomentioned later in the text

After combining the governing equations of all elementsand combining the boundary conditions the equation ofmotion of the rotor-bearing system is

Meuroq (t) + C _q(t) + Kq (t) f (t) (6)

where M M trs + M rot C [minusΩG + Ccon + Cbrg] andK [Kbrg + Ksh + Ktem + Ktemσ]

HereM is a mass matrix that includes mass componentscaused by translation along the axis (Mtrs) and rotation alongthe axis (Mrot) C is a damping matrix (asymmetric matrixcoefficient of the velocity vector) that includes a skew-symmetric gyro matrix (G) a constant structural dampingmatrix (Ccon βKcon) with hysteresis characteristics causedby internal friction of the material and damping caused bythe floating ring bearing support matrix (Cbrg) K is thestiffness matrix (matrix coefficient of the displacementvector) that includes the stiffness matrix (Kbrg) caused by thesupport of the floating ring bearing the spin-softeningbending matrix (Ksh) generated by the rotor rotation thestiffness matrix (Ktem) of the elastic modulus the stiffnessmatrix (Ktemσ) caused by the nonuniform thermal stress andthermal deformation caused by temperature changes esize of all matrices is 3a times 3a Ω is the rotor speed in rpm βis the material damping (Rayleigh damping) stiffnessdamping coefficient

e total displacement and global force vectors q(t) andf(t) are expressed as

q (t)

x(t) a times 1

y (t) a times 1

z (t) a times 1

⎧⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎭3atimes1

x1 (t)x2 (t)x3 (t) x(aminus 1) (t) xa(t)1113960 1113961T

y1 (t) y2(t) y3 (t) y(aminus 1) (t)ya(t)1113960 1113961T

z1 (t) z2 (t) z3 (t) z(aminus 1) (t) za(t)1113960 1113961T

⎧⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎭

f (t)

fx (t) a times 1

fy (t) a times 1

fz (t)a times 1

⎧⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎭3atimes1

fx1 (t) fx2 (t)fx3 (t) fx(aminus 1)(t) fxa (t)1113960 1113961T

fy1 (t) fy2(t) fy3 (t) fy(aminus 1)(t) fya (t)1113960 1113961T

fz1 (t) fz2 (t) fz3 (t) fz(aminus 1) (t) fza (t)1113960 1113961T

⎧⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎭

(7)

Turbinewheel Floating rings

bearings

Rotating shirustbearing Seal

sleeve

Nut

Compressorwheel

YZ

X

ωRotor

Figure 4 Composition of the rotor-shaft system

Table 3 Material of the main part of the rotor-shaft system

Part name Material nameTurbo impeller K418Compressor impeller and nut ZL105Shaft 42CrMorust bearing and seal sleeve 316 stainless steel

Shock and Vibration 5

208

195

182

169

156

143

130

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

0 200 400 600Temperature (degC)

800 1000

028

027

026

025

024

023

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

Temperature (degC)

580

560

540

520

500

480

460

440Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)

420

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

24

22

20

18

16

14

12

10

0 200 400 600 800 1000

(a)

0 50 100 150 250 300 350200 400 450Temperature (degC)

The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

900

800

185

180

175

170

165

160

155

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

72

68

64

60

0 50 100 150 250 300200Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

10

05

00

ndash05

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

56

(b)

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

215

210

205

200

195

190

185

180

175

Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

033

032

030

031

029

028

027

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

0 100 300 400 500200Temperature (degC)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

) 1350

1200

1050

900

750

600

450 The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)40

36

32

28

24

20

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

0 200 600 800 1000400

(c)

Figure 5 Continued

6 Shock and Vibration

Writing (6) in state-space form yields

A _w(t) Bw(t) + F(t) (8)

where matrices A and B state vector w(t) and force vectorF(t) are

A 0 M

M C1113890 1113891

6atimes6a

B M 0

0 minusK1113890 1113891

6atimes6a

w(t) _q (t)

q (t)1113896 1113897

6atimes1F(t)

0

f(t)1113896 1113897

6atimes1

(9)

where 0 is an empty matrix of size 3a times 3a and an emptyvector of size 3a times 1

Figure 10 shows a simplified finite element model of therotor-shaft system e grey-blue points in the figure areused to observe the modal shapes line trajectories andunbalanced harmonic response analysis

Figure 11 shows the rotor finite element global grid etotal number of grids was 3176485 with 546067 gridnodes In the geometry software each portion of the rotorwas treated as a part to avoid extra contact stiffness in thefinite element simulation and prevent affecting the simu-lation accuracy

To aid the comparison we considered two cases in thisstudy case 1 the rotor-shaft system without the influence oftemperature and case 2 the rotor-shaft system affected bytemperature In the following sections r-th forward and r-thbackward modes are represented as ldquor-Frdquo and ldquor-Brdquo modesrespectively

3 Results and Discussion

31 Heat Transfer Results and Experimental VerificationAfter the calculation we verified the numerical results of themass flow and the supercharger ratio (expansion ratio) enumerical results agreed with the experimental data and theerror control was approximately 7 as Figure 12 shows

e temperature distribution of the rotor was obtainedthrough postprocessing as Figure 13 shows the temperaturedistribution law was the same as that in the Bohn [19] studyresult and is shown in Figure 14

Figures 13 and 14 show that the highest temperature wasat the outer edge of the turbine wheel blades and that thelowest temperature was at the compressor wheel Overallthe rotor had a large temperature gradient

32 Modal Results

321 Campbell Diagram and Stability Diagram of NormalTemperature Environment Figure 15 shows the Campbelldiagram of the rotor-shaft system in case 1 that iswithout considering the temperature e figure was

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

0 600 800 1000 1200400200Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

034

032

030

028

026

024

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

0 800 1000 1200 1400 1600400 600200Temperature (degC)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

800

750

700

650

600

550

500 The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)32

28

24

20

16

12

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

(d)

Figure 5 Material properties of rotor-shaft system as a function of temperature (Youngrsquos modulus Poisson ratio specific heat capacity andthermal conductivity) (a) K418 (b) ZL105 (c) 42CrMo (d) 316 stainless steel [25 26]

Table 4 Damping coefficient of each partPart name Damping coefficientTurbo impeller 0002Compressor impeller and nut 0001Shaft 0005rust bearing and seal sleeve 0005

Table 5 Parameters of floating ring bearing that supported therotor shaftParameter name Parameter valueFloating ring mass 517 gInner length 514mmOuter length 796mmInner diameter 750mmOuter diameter 129mm

Shock and Vibration 7

Y

Divide

Z

X

14 cylinder

Figure 7 Rotor shaft divided into four parts and 14 cylinder

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

ndash2000

ndash4000

ndash6000

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

ndash2

ndash4

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

(a)

3000

2000

1000

0

ndash1000

ndash2000

ndash3000

ndash4000

12

10

08

06

04

02

00

ndash02

ndash04

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

(b)

Figure 6 Total impedance of floating ring bearing (equivalent stiffness and damping coefficients) (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

8 Shock and Vibration

obtained from the whirl frequency (obtained from theimaginary part of the eigenvalue) and the rotational speedTo present a clear figure and express its basic

characteristics only the first four whirling directions aredescribed In the figure there are two forward whirls (thewhirl direction of the rotor agrees with the rotation

cyx cyx

cxy

cyy cyykyxkyx

kyy

kxxkxx kxycxx

cxy cxxkxy

kyy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Y

X Z

Figure 10 Finite element model of rotor-shaft system

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

IY

Z

X

V ON V

U A

RK X

S

M

YQ

I

O

W

P

B

LT

Z

JTransit (sweep)A

K

SX

R W

Figure 8 Solid186 element generated by the sweep method

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

I

V O

A

K

SX

R W

YZ

X

Transit (tetrahedral) (i + 1)

(i + 2)

(i + 3)

J K O N R AV Z

J K O N R A V Z

O N V

W U

P M XT

I

QY SK

BL

AR

P M X

W U

I

Q

Q

I

UM X

W

PB

L

SY

T

J Z

YS

T L B

Transit (pyramid)

Transit (prism)

Figure 9 Solid186 elements generated by tetrahedral pyramid and prism methods

Shock and Vibration 9

direction of the speed) which are marked as 1F and 2F inorder of increased frequency ere are also two backwardwhirls (the whirl direction of the rotor is opposite to therotation direction of the speed) that are marked as 3B and

4B respectively e synchronous whirl line is called thesynchronous excitation line In the figure the velocitiescorresponding to the intersection of the synchronouswhirl line and the frequency line of the forward whirl are

Temperature8177

Turbineside

Compressorside

(K)

7688

7199

6710

6222

5733

5244

4755

4266

3777

Figure 13 Postprocessing rotor temperature distribution

Figure 11 Global grid of rotor-shaft system

008

007

006

005

004

003

002

001

000

60000rpm

80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

ExperimentalCFD

(a)

014

012

010

008

006

004

002

000

60000rpm80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

10 11 12 13 14 1615 17

ExperimentalCFD

(b)

Figure 12 Numerical simulation verified by experiments (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

10 Shock and Vibration

Compressorside

Turbineside035 10

TToT times103 (K)

Figure 14 Rotor temperature distribution of Bohn [19]

times103

SWL (1X)

Normal temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 15 Campbell diagram showing whirl frequency and rotor-spin speed for the first four modes

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

Normal temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 16 Stability diagram of rotor-shaft system without considering temperature

Shock and Vibration 11

marked as Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 respectively and were calculatedas follows Ωcr1 5 0115 rpm and Ωcr2 43 622 rpmBecause the backward whirl could not be excited by theunbalanced force it is not marked or considered

When the speed was in the critical speed range be-tween Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in the 1F mode the whirling fre-quency had a clear increasing trend at trend may havebeen caused by floating ring bearings because in thecritical speed range of Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 the stiffness anddamping of the oil film changed sharply When the criticalspeed of Ωcr2 was exceeded the stiffness and damping ofthe oil film changed smoothly and the eddy frequency inthe corresponding 1F mode also increased at a constantrate

Figure 16 shows that the curve of the damping ratio ofthe four modes in case 1 changed with the rotation speede modal damping ratio is the ratio of actual damping tothe critical damping of a certain mode and the dampingratio is the decisive parameter to describe the stability Apositive damping ratio means that the rotor-shaft systemwas in a stable region when the vibration energy wasdissipated A negative damping ratio means that therotation energy supported the rotor rotation by addingvibration energy resulting in the rotor-shaft systembecoming unstable e point where the damping ratiocurve intersects with the zero line is the stable limit speed(SLS) e figure shows that the rotor-shaft system be-came unstable when SLS 1 56 550 rpm in 1F mode andthen became unstable when SLS 2 97 946 rpm in 2Fmode

Figure 17 shows the four modes close to the SLS 1stability limit speed at 55000 rpm e black dotted linerepresents the axis the combination of the orange line andthe orange sphere represents the starting position of thetrajectory and the incomplete track curve represents thewhirl direction e figure shows that the 1F mode wascylindrical thus combining rigid body motion with rotorbending Furthermore the rotor was close to the unstablestate at this time In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode e figure shows that the 3B mode wasconical with both rigid body motion and rotor bendingLastly the 4B mode was cylindrical with both rigid bodymotion and rotor bending

Figure 18 shows the four modes close to the SLS 2stability limit speed at 97946 rpme rotor was close to theunstable state at this time e 1F and 3B modes were cy-lindrical and conical combining rigid body motion androtor bending In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode

322 Effect of Temperature on the Campbell Diagram andStability Diagram We exported the temperature data ofeach node in Figure 12 and inserted the temperature valueinto the corresponding rotor-shaft system node through the

Ansys software commands functionWe analysed the criticalspeed and stability of the rotor-shaft system in the thermalenvironment

Figure 19 shows that temperature affected the intrinsicfrequency (whirl frequency) Compared with case 1 thewhirl-frequency curves in the 1F 2F and 3B modes wereslightly lower whereas for the 4B mode the whirl-fre-quency curve was much lower In the figure the startingpoint at the left end (when the rotating speed was 0 rpm)was taken as the observation object In case 1 the frequencywas 23009 Hz whereas in case 2 the frequency decreasedto 21825 Hz Because the temperature changed the ma-terialrsquos elastic modulus and Poissonrsquos ratio it affected itsstructural stiffness For higher-order frequencies the effecton frequency became greater as the order increasedHowever the effect on the critical speed Ωcr1 did notchange much whereas Ωcr2 decreased from 43622 rpm to41815 rpm is decrease was also caused by the intrinsicfrequency drop

Figure 20 shows the stability diagram in case 2 and thatthe temperature had an important effect on the dampingratio and SLS Compared with case 1 SLS 1 of the 1F modedecreased from the original 56550 rpm to 55078 rpm andmade the 1F mode enter the unstable region ahead of timee 2F mode change was more obvious and the same SLS 2decreased from the original 97946 rpm to 95969 rpm ereason for this can be explained by the following formulaξr (α2ωhr) + (βωhr2) Here ξr is the damping ratiocoefficient of the rth mode α is the mass damping coeffi-cient β is the stiffness damping coefficient and ωhr is thenatural frequency of the rth mode In most cases α (α 0)can be disregarded that is ξr βωhr2 β did not changewhereas ωhr decreased because of the effect of temperatureresulting in a decrease in ξr In other words SLS 1 and SLS 2in the 1F and 2F modes were reduced erefore whenpredicting the stability limit reset and dynamic perfor-mance of a turbocharger rotor the effect of temperatureshould have a great influence on the dynamic design of therotor

323 Unbalance Response Analysis We applied a dummyunbalance mass of 001 kg middot mm at node 2 and the fre-quency range of the steady-state synchronous responseanalysis was 0 to 2500Hz (corresponding speed range0 to 150 000 rpm) We then measured the response am-plitude of the turbine end floating ring bearing centerposition node 5 In Figure 21 case 1 is represented by ablack curve (normal temperature) and case 2 by a redcurve (high temperature) In case 1 (case 2) the curvesrepresent 6F 6B and 20F modes e frequency at thewave crest corresponding to the frequency correspondingto the fast reverse rotation (the frequency of the rotationspeed within one minute) in the case 1 (case 2) Campbelldiagram as shown in Figures 22 and 23) is similar to the

12 Shock and Vibration

black (red) number in Figure 20 Because the steeringmode is dominant in the response diagram the criticalspeeds Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in case 1 (case 2) 1F and 2F modesare not shown in the diagram and followed a phenom-enon similar to that reported by Chouksey and Roy[29 30] Because of the effect of temperature the steering

frequency of case 2 shifted to the left making the changeof response amplitude more obvious e responsevalue at the peak of the 6F and 6B modes decreased from0147mm to 0014 mm and that at the peak of the20F and 20B modes decreased from 0036 mm to00037 mm

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02

ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 17 Mode shapes at 55000 rpm (SLS 1) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

Shock and Vibration 13

324 Verification of Rotor FEM Natural frequency anal-ysis is very important as the basis of a dynamic analysisWe obtained the first two natural frequencies of the rotorby hammering experiments and verified them by nu-merical simulation Figure 24 shows the measured parts(rotor system) force hammer and piezoelectric acceler-ation sensor To reduce the measurement error rate we

adopted a sensor with a nonlinearity of less than 12 anda sensitivity of 10 mvg and placed the sensor in themiddle of the rotor shaft Table 6 compares the naturalfrequency experimental value with the simulated valuee experimental and simulated values of the first naturalfrequency were 1386Hz and 1453 Hz respectively esecond-order natural frequencies were 4100 Hz and

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

010203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash01

0001

0203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 18 Mode shapes at 97000 rpm (SLS 2) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

14 Shock and Vibration

4383 Hz respectively and the error rate was within 7But the higher mass of the accelerometer is the maincause of error value between the experimental value andthe simulated value

A more favorable verification was the oil film data shownin Figure 6e oil film data were experimental data providedby the turbocharger company In the simulation the oil filmwas the key factor in supporting or restraining the rotor isalso illustrates the reliability of the simulation method

times103

SWL (1X)

High temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 19 Effect of temperature on the Campbell diagram

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

High temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

Figure 20 Effect of temperature on stability diagram

5375Hz0036mm

8125Hz0147mm

Turbine side node 5X-direction

001

000500 1000

525Hz00037mm 7875Hz

0014mm

000

002

004

006

008

010

012

014

016

Am

plitu

de (m

m)

250 5000 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500Frequency (Hz)

Normal temperatureHigh temperature

Figure 21 Response comparison between case 1 and case 2 of theturbine side floating ring bearing center position (node 5)

Shock and Vibration 15

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 4: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

e heat transfer of the surrounding air was disregardedand the out-wall of the turbocharger was assumed to beadiabatic We applied ldquono-sliprdquo boundary conditions to allinner walls An interface was added between the rotatingdomain and the fixed domain and the interface was con-nected by a ldquofrozen rotorrdquo [24]

214 Numerical Methodology CHTrefers to a coupled heattransfer phenomenon in which the thermal properties of twomaterials occur through a medium or in direct contact eCHT method can calculate the heat transfer between fluidand solid and calculate the temperatures of fluids and solidsat the same time In this study we used the commercialsoftware Ansys CFX for numerical simulation CFX is acomputational fluid dynamics software package based on thecontrol volume method to solve NavierndashStokes equations Inthe fluid domain the mass conservation momentum andenergy transport equations are described as

zρf

zt+ nabla middot ρf uf1113872 1113873 0 (1)

zuf ρf

zt+ nabla middot ρf uf uf1113872 1113873 minus nablap + nabla middot τ (2)

zhtot ρf

zt+ nabla middot ρf uf htot1113872 1113873 nabla middot λf nablaT1113872 1113873 + nabla middot uf middot τ1113872 1113873

(3)

where uf ρf p τ λf T htot and t represent the velocityvector density pressure stress tensor thermal conductivitytemperature total enthalpy and time of the fluidrespectively

In a solid domain the conservation of energy equationcan explain the heat transfer caused by solid motion con-duction and a volume heat source e energy equation is

zhtot ρs

zt+ nabla middot ρs us htot( 1113857 nabla middot λsnablaT( 1113857 + SE (4)

where us is the velocity vector of the solid us uf SE is theoptional volume heat source SE nabla middot (us middot τ) ρs is the densityof the solid and λs is the thermal conductivity of the solid

is study did not directly solve (1)ndash(4) Instead theywere converted to the steady-state Reynolds averageNavierndashStokes method to calculate turbulence e fluidmedium (exhaust gas and air) is an ideal gas and the shearstress transmission (SST) turbulence model was used be-cause the SST turbulence model has good accuracy for CHTcalculations [20] at model has both the accuracy of thek minus ω model in high-pressure gradient flow boundary layerprediction and the stability of the k minus e model in mainstreamprediction [18]

22 Modal Part

221 Rotor-Shaft System Geometry emodel of the rotor-shaft system was provided by the turbocharger company andagreed with the real onee rotor-shaft system comprised a

turbine wheel a compressor wheel a rotating shaft afloating ring bearing a thrust bearing a seal sleeve and anut as Figure 4 shows e turbine wheel and shaft wereconnected by friction welding whereas the compressor wasaxially and circumferentially fixed by a left-hand nut

e materials of the main parts of the rotor-shaft systemare shown in Table 3 based on the actual situation

is study investigated the effect of temperature andfound that the material properties changed as the temper-ature changed e function curves of the material prop-erties of each part as a function of temperature are shown inFigure 5 [25 26]

Publication [29] proposes a set of damping coefficientsand we verified the influence of damping coefficients on thestability limit displacement of the rotor through theoreticalanalysis and numerical simulation We selected this set ofdamping coefficients based on the theory of the publication

Table 4 shows what we assumed was the materialdamping coefficient of each part of the rotor

222 Floating Ring Bearing Parameters e rotor shaft wassupported by a floating ring bearing whose detailed pa-rameters are shown in Table 5

To aid the simulation we combined the stiffness anddamping coefficients of the inner and outer oil film into atotal impedance (equivalent stiffness and damping coeffi-cients) according to [27 28] Combining the stiffness anddamping coefficients of the inner and outer oil film providedby the turbocharger company with the parameters of thefloating ring bearing we calculated the total impedanceusing Dyrobes rotor dynamics software (Dyrobes USA)Figure 6 shows the total impedance (equivalent stiffness anddamping coefficients) of the floating ring bearing at variousspeeds

223 Finite Element Model of Rotor is study used a large-scale general software Ansys Workbench for simulation Toobtain the motion trace on the axis the rotor shaft wasequally divided into four parts along the axis direction asshown in Figure 7 e blue lines (solid and dotted) in thefigure represent the division positions

e solid model was discretised and an Ansys Solid186element was used e Solid186 element is a high-order 3D20-node element with quadratic displacement characteris-tics e element is defined by 20 nodes each node withthree degrees of freedom (translation of each node in the x-y- and z-directions) e element supports plasticitysuperelasticity creep stress hardening large deflection andlarge strain capacity In the shaft part the grid was generatedby a sweep as shown in Figure 8 depicting the ldquoithrdquo elementafter segmentation

We transformed (deformed) the original hexahedronelement to an approximately one-quarter cylinder elementIn Figure 8 the red dotted line represents the actual edge ofthe element and the red solid line represents the edge of theelement e advantage of a solid model is that it retains theproperties of the original element and describes the outercontour of the shaft model well

4 Shock and Vibration

To adapt to the more complicated outer contour of theblade tetrahedral pyramid and prismmethods were used togenerate the unit in the blade and the remaining partFigure 9 shows the (i + 1) (i + 2) and (i + 3) elementsgenerated by three methods

e effects of rotational inertia translational inertia gyromoment support stiffness support damping materialdamping rotational damping and thermal stress stiffnesswere considered in the model to establish the equation ofmotion e rotor model was discretised into Ne elementsand the total number of nodes became a e node dis-placement vector of the ith element is

qe xiI yiI ziI xiJ yiJ ziJ xiμ yiμ ziμ xiA1113966

yiA ziA xiB yiB ziB1113865T

(5)

where μ I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W

X Y Z A B is the node number and the superscript T isthe matrixvector transpose ese writing formats are alsomentioned later in the text

After combining the governing equations of all elementsand combining the boundary conditions the equation ofmotion of the rotor-bearing system is

Meuroq (t) + C _q(t) + Kq (t) f (t) (6)

where M M trs + M rot C [minusΩG + Ccon + Cbrg] andK [Kbrg + Ksh + Ktem + Ktemσ]

HereM is a mass matrix that includes mass componentscaused by translation along the axis (Mtrs) and rotation alongthe axis (Mrot) C is a damping matrix (asymmetric matrixcoefficient of the velocity vector) that includes a skew-symmetric gyro matrix (G) a constant structural dampingmatrix (Ccon βKcon) with hysteresis characteristics causedby internal friction of the material and damping caused bythe floating ring bearing support matrix (Cbrg) K is thestiffness matrix (matrix coefficient of the displacementvector) that includes the stiffness matrix (Kbrg) caused by thesupport of the floating ring bearing the spin-softeningbending matrix (Ksh) generated by the rotor rotation thestiffness matrix (Ktem) of the elastic modulus the stiffnessmatrix (Ktemσ) caused by the nonuniform thermal stress andthermal deformation caused by temperature changes esize of all matrices is 3a times 3a Ω is the rotor speed in rpm βis the material damping (Rayleigh damping) stiffnessdamping coefficient

e total displacement and global force vectors q(t) andf(t) are expressed as

q (t)

x(t) a times 1

y (t) a times 1

z (t) a times 1

⎧⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎭3atimes1

x1 (t)x2 (t)x3 (t) x(aminus 1) (t) xa(t)1113960 1113961T

y1 (t) y2(t) y3 (t) y(aminus 1) (t)ya(t)1113960 1113961T

z1 (t) z2 (t) z3 (t) z(aminus 1) (t) za(t)1113960 1113961T

⎧⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎭

f (t)

fx (t) a times 1

fy (t) a times 1

fz (t)a times 1

⎧⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎭3atimes1

fx1 (t) fx2 (t)fx3 (t) fx(aminus 1)(t) fxa (t)1113960 1113961T

fy1 (t) fy2(t) fy3 (t) fy(aminus 1)(t) fya (t)1113960 1113961T

fz1 (t) fz2 (t) fz3 (t) fz(aminus 1) (t) fza (t)1113960 1113961T

⎧⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎭

(7)

Turbinewheel Floating rings

bearings

Rotating shirustbearing Seal

sleeve

Nut

Compressorwheel

YZ

X

ωRotor

Figure 4 Composition of the rotor-shaft system

Table 3 Material of the main part of the rotor-shaft system

Part name Material nameTurbo impeller K418Compressor impeller and nut ZL105Shaft 42CrMorust bearing and seal sleeve 316 stainless steel

Shock and Vibration 5

208

195

182

169

156

143

130

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

0 200 400 600Temperature (degC)

800 1000

028

027

026

025

024

023

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

Temperature (degC)

580

560

540

520

500

480

460

440Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)

420

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

24

22

20

18

16

14

12

10

0 200 400 600 800 1000

(a)

0 50 100 150 250 300 350200 400 450Temperature (degC)

The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

900

800

185

180

175

170

165

160

155

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

72

68

64

60

0 50 100 150 250 300200Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

10

05

00

ndash05

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

56

(b)

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

215

210

205

200

195

190

185

180

175

Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

033

032

030

031

029

028

027

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

0 100 300 400 500200Temperature (degC)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

) 1350

1200

1050

900

750

600

450 The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)40

36

32

28

24

20

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

0 200 600 800 1000400

(c)

Figure 5 Continued

6 Shock and Vibration

Writing (6) in state-space form yields

A _w(t) Bw(t) + F(t) (8)

where matrices A and B state vector w(t) and force vectorF(t) are

A 0 M

M C1113890 1113891

6atimes6a

B M 0

0 minusK1113890 1113891

6atimes6a

w(t) _q (t)

q (t)1113896 1113897

6atimes1F(t)

0

f(t)1113896 1113897

6atimes1

(9)

where 0 is an empty matrix of size 3a times 3a and an emptyvector of size 3a times 1

Figure 10 shows a simplified finite element model of therotor-shaft system e grey-blue points in the figure areused to observe the modal shapes line trajectories andunbalanced harmonic response analysis

Figure 11 shows the rotor finite element global grid etotal number of grids was 3176485 with 546067 gridnodes In the geometry software each portion of the rotorwas treated as a part to avoid extra contact stiffness in thefinite element simulation and prevent affecting the simu-lation accuracy

To aid the comparison we considered two cases in thisstudy case 1 the rotor-shaft system without the influence oftemperature and case 2 the rotor-shaft system affected bytemperature In the following sections r-th forward and r-thbackward modes are represented as ldquor-Frdquo and ldquor-Brdquo modesrespectively

3 Results and Discussion

31 Heat Transfer Results and Experimental VerificationAfter the calculation we verified the numerical results of themass flow and the supercharger ratio (expansion ratio) enumerical results agreed with the experimental data and theerror control was approximately 7 as Figure 12 shows

e temperature distribution of the rotor was obtainedthrough postprocessing as Figure 13 shows the temperaturedistribution law was the same as that in the Bohn [19] studyresult and is shown in Figure 14

Figures 13 and 14 show that the highest temperature wasat the outer edge of the turbine wheel blades and that thelowest temperature was at the compressor wheel Overallthe rotor had a large temperature gradient

32 Modal Results

321 Campbell Diagram and Stability Diagram of NormalTemperature Environment Figure 15 shows the Campbelldiagram of the rotor-shaft system in case 1 that iswithout considering the temperature e figure was

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

0 600 800 1000 1200400200Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

034

032

030

028

026

024

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

0 800 1000 1200 1400 1600400 600200Temperature (degC)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

800

750

700

650

600

550

500 The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)32

28

24

20

16

12

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

(d)

Figure 5 Material properties of rotor-shaft system as a function of temperature (Youngrsquos modulus Poisson ratio specific heat capacity andthermal conductivity) (a) K418 (b) ZL105 (c) 42CrMo (d) 316 stainless steel [25 26]

Table 4 Damping coefficient of each partPart name Damping coefficientTurbo impeller 0002Compressor impeller and nut 0001Shaft 0005rust bearing and seal sleeve 0005

Table 5 Parameters of floating ring bearing that supported therotor shaftParameter name Parameter valueFloating ring mass 517 gInner length 514mmOuter length 796mmInner diameter 750mmOuter diameter 129mm

Shock and Vibration 7

Y

Divide

Z

X

14 cylinder

Figure 7 Rotor shaft divided into four parts and 14 cylinder

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

ndash2000

ndash4000

ndash6000

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

ndash2

ndash4

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

(a)

3000

2000

1000

0

ndash1000

ndash2000

ndash3000

ndash4000

12

10

08

06

04

02

00

ndash02

ndash04

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

(b)

Figure 6 Total impedance of floating ring bearing (equivalent stiffness and damping coefficients) (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

8 Shock and Vibration

obtained from the whirl frequency (obtained from theimaginary part of the eigenvalue) and the rotational speedTo present a clear figure and express its basic

characteristics only the first four whirling directions aredescribed In the figure there are two forward whirls (thewhirl direction of the rotor agrees with the rotation

cyx cyx

cxy

cyy cyykyxkyx

kyy

kxxkxx kxycxx

cxy cxxkxy

kyy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Y

X Z

Figure 10 Finite element model of rotor-shaft system

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

IY

Z

X

V ON V

U A

RK X

S

M

YQ

I

O

W

P

B

LT

Z

JTransit (sweep)A

K

SX

R W

Figure 8 Solid186 element generated by the sweep method

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

I

V O

A

K

SX

R W

YZ

X

Transit (tetrahedral) (i + 1)

(i + 2)

(i + 3)

J K O N R AV Z

J K O N R A V Z

O N V

W U

P M XT

I

QY SK

BL

AR

P M X

W U

I

Q

Q

I

UM X

W

PB

L

SY

T

J Z

YS

T L B

Transit (pyramid)

Transit (prism)

Figure 9 Solid186 elements generated by tetrahedral pyramid and prism methods

Shock and Vibration 9

direction of the speed) which are marked as 1F and 2F inorder of increased frequency ere are also two backwardwhirls (the whirl direction of the rotor is opposite to therotation direction of the speed) that are marked as 3B and

4B respectively e synchronous whirl line is called thesynchronous excitation line In the figure the velocitiescorresponding to the intersection of the synchronouswhirl line and the frequency line of the forward whirl are

Temperature8177

Turbineside

Compressorside

(K)

7688

7199

6710

6222

5733

5244

4755

4266

3777

Figure 13 Postprocessing rotor temperature distribution

Figure 11 Global grid of rotor-shaft system

008

007

006

005

004

003

002

001

000

60000rpm

80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

ExperimentalCFD

(a)

014

012

010

008

006

004

002

000

60000rpm80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

10 11 12 13 14 1615 17

ExperimentalCFD

(b)

Figure 12 Numerical simulation verified by experiments (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

10 Shock and Vibration

Compressorside

Turbineside035 10

TToT times103 (K)

Figure 14 Rotor temperature distribution of Bohn [19]

times103

SWL (1X)

Normal temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 15 Campbell diagram showing whirl frequency and rotor-spin speed for the first four modes

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

Normal temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 16 Stability diagram of rotor-shaft system without considering temperature

Shock and Vibration 11

marked as Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 respectively and were calculatedas follows Ωcr1 5 0115 rpm and Ωcr2 43 622 rpmBecause the backward whirl could not be excited by theunbalanced force it is not marked or considered

When the speed was in the critical speed range be-tween Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in the 1F mode the whirling fre-quency had a clear increasing trend at trend may havebeen caused by floating ring bearings because in thecritical speed range of Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 the stiffness anddamping of the oil film changed sharply When the criticalspeed of Ωcr2 was exceeded the stiffness and damping ofthe oil film changed smoothly and the eddy frequency inthe corresponding 1F mode also increased at a constantrate

Figure 16 shows that the curve of the damping ratio ofthe four modes in case 1 changed with the rotation speede modal damping ratio is the ratio of actual damping tothe critical damping of a certain mode and the dampingratio is the decisive parameter to describe the stability Apositive damping ratio means that the rotor-shaft systemwas in a stable region when the vibration energy wasdissipated A negative damping ratio means that therotation energy supported the rotor rotation by addingvibration energy resulting in the rotor-shaft systembecoming unstable e point where the damping ratiocurve intersects with the zero line is the stable limit speed(SLS) e figure shows that the rotor-shaft system be-came unstable when SLS 1 56 550 rpm in 1F mode andthen became unstable when SLS 2 97 946 rpm in 2Fmode

Figure 17 shows the four modes close to the SLS 1stability limit speed at 55000 rpm e black dotted linerepresents the axis the combination of the orange line andthe orange sphere represents the starting position of thetrajectory and the incomplete track curve represents thewhirl direction e figure shows that the 1F mode wascylindrical thus combining rigid body motion with rotorbending Furthermore the rotor was close to the unstablestate at this time In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode e figure shows that the 3B mode wasconical with both rigid body motion and rotor bendingLastly the 4B mode was cylindrical with both rigid bodymotion and rotor bending

Figure 18 shows the four modes close to the SLS 2stability limit speed at 97946 rpme rotor was close to theunstable state at this time e 1F and 3B modes were cy-lindrical and conical combining rigid body motion androtor bending In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode

322 Effect of Temperature on the Campbell Diagram andStability Diagram We exported the temperature data ofeach node in Figure 12 and inserted the temperature valueinto the corresponding rotor-shaft system node through the

Ansys software commands functionWe analysed the criticalspeed and stability of the rotor-shaft system in the thermalenvironment

Figure 19 shows that temperature affected the intrinsicfrequency (whirl frequency) Compared with case 1 thewhirl-frequency curves in the 1F 2F and 3B modes wereslightly lower whereas for the 4B mode the whirl-fre-quency curve was much lower In the figure the startingpoint at the left end (when the rotating speed was 0 rpm)was taken as the observation object In case 1 the frequencywas 23009 Hz whereas in case 2 the frequency decreasedto 21825 Hz Because the temperature changed the ma-terialrsquos elastic modulus and Poissonrsquos ratio it affected itsstructural stiffness For higher-order frequencies the effecton frequency became greater as the order increasedHowever the effect on the critical speed Ωcr1 did notchange much whereas Ωcr2 decreased from 43622 rpm to41815 rpm is decrease was also caused by the intrinsicfrequency drop

Figure 20 shows the stability diagram in case 2 and thatthe temperature had an important effect on the dampingratio and SLS Compared with case 1 SLS 1 of the 1F modedecreased from the original 56550 rpm to 55078 rpm andmade the 1F mode enter the unstable region ahead of timee 2F mode change was more obvious and the same SLS 2decreased from the original 97946 rpm to 95969 rpm ereason for this can be explained by the following formulaξr (α2ωhr) + (βωhr2) Here ξr is the damping ratiocoefficient of the rth mode α is the mass damping coeffi-cient β is the stiffness damping coefficient and ωhr is thenatural frequency of the rth mode In most cases α (α 0)can be disregarded that is ξr βωhr2 β did not changewhereas ωhr decreased because of the effect of temperatureresulting in a decrease in ξr In other words SLS 1 and SLS 2in the 1F and 2F modes were reduced erefore whenpredicting the stability limit reset and dynamic perfor-mance of a turbocharger rotor the effect of temperatureshould have a great influence on the dynamic design of therotor

323 Unbalance Response Analysis We applied a dummyunbalance mass of 001 kg middot mm at node 2 and the fre-quency range of the steady-state synchronous responseanalysis was 0 to 2500Hz (corresponding speed range0 to 150 000 rpm) We then measured the response am-plitude of the turbine end floating ring bearing centerposition node 5 In Figure 21 case 1 is represented by ablack curve (normal temperature) and case 2 by a redcurve (high temperature) In case 1 (case 2) the curvesrepresent 6F 6B and 20F modes e frequency at thewave crest corresponding to the frequency correspondingto the fast reverse rotation (the frequency of the rotationspeed within one minute) in the case 1 (case 2) Campbelldiagram as shown in Figures 22 and 23) is similar to the

12 Shock and Vibration

black (red) number in Figure 20 Because the steeringmode is dominant in the response diagram the criticalspeeds Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in case 1 (case 2) 1F and 2F modesare not shown in the diagram and followed a phenom-enon similar to that reported by Chouksey and Roy[29 30] Because of the effect of temperature the steering

frequency of case 2 shifted to the left making the changeof response amplitude more obvious e responsevalue at the peak of the 6F and 6B modes decreased from0147mm to 0014 mm and that at the peak of the20F and 20B modes decreased from 0036 mm to00037 mm

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02

ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 17 Mode shapes at 55000 rpm (SLS 1) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

Shock and Vibration 13

324 Verification of Rotor FEM Natural frequency anal-ysis is very important as the basis of a dynamic analysisWe obtained the first two natural frequencies of the rotorby hammering experiments and verified them by nu-merical simulation Figure 24 shows the measured parts(rotor system) force hammer and piezoelectric acceler-ation sensor To reduce the measurement error rate we

adopted a sensor with a nonlinearity of less than 12 anda sensitivity of 10 mvg and placed the sensor in themiddle of the rotor shaft Table 6 compares the naturalfrequency experimental value with the simulated valuee experimental and simulated values of the first naturalfrequency were 1386Hz and 1453 Hz respectively esecond-order natural frequencies were 4100 Hz and

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

010203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash01

0001

0203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 18 Mode shapes at 97000 rpm (SLS 2) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

14 Shock and Vibration

4383 Hz respectively and the error rate was within 7But the higher mass of the accelerometer is the maincause of error value between the experimental value andthe simulated value

A more favorable verification was the oil film data shownin Figure 6e oil film data were experimental data providedby the turbocharger company In the simulation the oil filmwas the key factor in supporting or restraining the rotor isalso illustrates the reliability of the simulation method

times103

SWL (1X)

High temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 19 Effect of temperature on the Campbell diagram

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

High temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

Figure 20 Effect of temperature on stability diagram

5375Hz0036mm

8125Hz0147mm

Turbine side node 5X-direction

001

000500 1000

525Hz00037mm 7875Hz

0014mm

000

002

004

006

008

010

012

014

016

Am

plitu

de (m

m)

250 5000 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500Frequency (Hz)

Normal temperatureHigh temperature

Figure 21 Response comparison between case 1 and case 2 of theturbine side floating ring bearing center position (node 5)

Shock and Vibration 15

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 5: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

To adapt to the more complicated outer contour of theblade tetrahedral pyramid and prismmethods were used togenerate the unit in the blade and the remaining partFigure 9 shows the (i + 1) (i + 2) and (i + 3) elementsgenerated by three methods

e effects of rotational inertia translational inertia gyromoment support stiffness support damping materialdamping rotational damping and thermal stress stiffnesswere considered in the model to establish the equation ofmotion e rotor model was discretised into Ne elementsand the total number of nodes became a e node dis-placement vector of the ith element is

qe xiI yiI ziI xiJ yiJ ziJ xiμ yiμ ziμ xiA1113966

yiA ziA xiB yiB ziB1113865T

(5)

where μ I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W

X Y Z A B is the node number and the superscript T isthe matrixvector transpose ese writing formats are alsomentioned later in the text

After combining the governing equations of all elementsand combining the boundary conditions the equation ofmotion of the rotor-bearing system is

Meuroq (t) + C _q(t) + Kq (t) f (t) (6)

where M M trs + M rot C [minusΩG + Ccon + Cbrg] andK [Kbrg + Ksh + Ktem + Ktemσ]

HereM is a mass matrix that includes mass componentscaused by translation along the axis (Mtrs) and rotation alongthe axis (Mrot) C is a damping matrix (asymmetric matrixcoefficient of the velocity vector) that includes a skew-symmetric gyro matrix (G) a constant structural dampingmatrix (Ccon βKcon) with hysteresis characteristics causedby internal friction of the material and damping caused bythe floating ring bearing support matrix (Cbrg) K is thestiffness matrix (matrix coefficient of the displacementvector) that includes the stiffness matrix (Kbrg) caused by thesupport of the floating ring bearing the spin-softeningbending matrix (Ksh) generated by the rotor rotation thestiffness matrix (Ktem) of the elastic modulus the stiffnessmatrix (Ktemσ) caused by the nonuniform thermal stress andthermal deformation caused by temperature changes esize of all matrices is 3a times 3a Ω is the rotor speed in rpm βis the material damping (Rayleigh damping) stiffnessdamping coefficient

e total displacement and global force vectors q(t) andf(t) are expressed as

q (t)

x(t) a times 1

y (t) a times 1

z (t) a times 1

⎧⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎭3atimes1

x1 (t)x2 (t)x3 (t) x(aminus 1) (t) xa(t)1113960 1113961T

y1 (t) y2(t) y3 (t) y(aminus 1) (t)ya(t)1113960 1113961T

z1 (t) z2 (t) z3 (t) z(aminus 1) (t) za(t)1113960 1113961T

⎧⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎭

f (t)

fx (t) a times 1

fy (t) a times 1

fz (t)a times 1

⎧⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎭3atimes1

fx1 (t) fx2 (t)fx3 (t) fx(aminus 1)(t) fxa (t)1113960 1113961T

fy1 (t) fy2(t) fy3 (t) fy(aminus 1)(t) fya (t)1113960 1113961T

fz1 (t) fz2 (t) fz3 (t) fz(aminus 1) (t) fza (t)1113960 1113961T

⎧⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎨

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎩

⎫⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎬

⎪⎪⎪⎪⎪⎭

(7)

Turbinewheel Floating rings

bearings

Rotating shirustbearing Seal

sleeve

Nut

Compressorwheel

YZ

X

ωRotor

Figure 4 Composition of the rotor-shaft system

Table 3 Material of the main part of the rotor-shaft system

Part name Material nameTurbo impeller K418Compressor impeller and nut ZL105Shaft 42CrMorust bearing and seal sleeve 316 stainless steel

Shock and Vibration 5

208

195

182

169

156

143

130

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

0 200 400 600Temperature (degC)

800 1000

028

027

026

025

024

023

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

Temperature (degC)

580

560

540

520

500

480

460

440Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)

420

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

24

22

20

18

16

14

12

10

0 200 400 600 800 1000

(a)

0 50 100 150 250 300 350200 400 450Temperature (degC)

The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

900

800

185

180

175

170

165

160

155

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

72

68

64

60

0 50 100 150 250 300200Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

10

05

00

ndash05

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

56

(b)

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

215

210

205

200

195

190

185

180

175

Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

033

032

030

031

029

028

027

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

0 100 300 400 500200Temperature (degC)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

) 1350

1200

1050

900

750

600

450 The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)40

36

32

28

24

20

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

0 200 600 800 1000400

(c)

Figure 5 Continued

6 Shock and Vibration

Writing (6) in state-space form yields

A _w(t) Bw(t) + F(t) (8)

where matrices A and B state vector w(t) and force vectorF(t) are

A 0 M

M C1113890 1113891

6atimes6a

B M 0

0 minusK1113890 1113891

6atimes6a

w(t) _q (t)

q (t)1113896 1113897

6atimes1F(t)

0

f(t)1113896 1113897

6atimes1

(9)

where 0 is an empty matrix of size 3a times 3a and an emptyvector of size 3a times 1

Figure 10 shows a simplified finite element model of therotor-shaft system e grey-blue points in the figure areused to observe the modal shapes line trajectories andunbalanced harmonic response analysis

Figure 11 shows the rotor finite element global grid etotal number of grids was 3176485 with 546067 gridnodes In the geometry software each portion of the rotorwas treated as a part to avoid extra contact stiffness in thefinite element simulation and prevent affecting the simu-lation accuracy

To aid the comparison we considered two cases in thisstudy case 1 the rotor-shaft system without the influence oftemperature and case 2 the rotor-shaft system affected bytemperature In the following sections r-th forward and r-thbackward modes are represented as ldquor-Frdquo and ldquor-Brdquo modesrespectively

3 Results and Discussion

31 Heat Transfer Results and Experimental VerificationAfter the calculation we verified the numerical results of themass flow and the supercharger ratio (expansion ratio) enumerical results agreed with the experimental data and theerror control was approximately 7 as Figure 12 shows

e temperature distribution of the rotor was obtainedthrough postprocessing as Figure 13 shows the temperaturedistribution law was the same as that in the Bohn [19] studyresult and is shown in Figure 14

Figures 13 and 14 show that the highest temperature wasat the outer edge of the turbine wheel blades and that thelowest temperature was at the compressor wheel Overallthe rotor had a large temperature gradient

32 Modal Results

321 Campbell Diagram and Stability Diagram of NormalTemperature Environment Figure 15 shows the Campbelldiagram of the rotor-shaft system in case 1 that iswithout considering the temperature e figure was

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

0 600 800 1000 1200400200Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

034

032

030

028

026

024

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

0 800 1000 1200 1400 1600400 600200Temperature (degC)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

800

750

700

650

600

550

500 The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)32

28

24

20

16

12

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

(d)

Figure 5 Material properties of rotor-shaft system as a function of temperature (Youngrsquos modulus Poisson ratio specific heat capacity andthermal conductivity) (a) K418 (b) ZL105 (c) 42CrMo (d) 316 stainless steel [25 26]

Table 4 Damping coefficient of each partPart name Damping coefficientTurbo impeller 0002Compressor impeller and nut 0001Shaft 0005rust bearing and seal sleeve 0005

Table 5 Parameters of floating ring bearing that supported therotor shaftParameter name Parameter valueFloating ring mass 517 gInner length 514mmOuter length 796mmInner diameter 750mmOuter diameter 129mm

Shock and Vibration 7

Y

Divide

Z

X

14 cylinder

Figure 7 Rotor shaft divided into four parts and 14 cylinder

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

ndash2000

ndash4000

ndash6000

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

ndash2

ndash4

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

(a)

3000

2000

1000

0

ndash1000

ndash2000

ndash3000

ndash4000

12

10

08

06

04

02

00

ndash02

ndash04

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

(b)

Figure 6 Total impedance of floating ring bearing (equivalent stiffness and damping coefficients) (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

8 Shock and Vibration

obtained from the whirl frequency (obtained from theimaginary part of the eigenvalue) and the rotational speedTo present a clear figure and express its basic

characteristics only the first four whirling directions aredescribed In the figure there are two forward whirls (thewhirl direction of the rotor agrees with the rotation

cyx cyx

cxy

cyy cyykyxkyx

kyy

kxxkxx kxycxx

cxy cxxkxy

kyy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Y

X Z

Figure 10 Finite element model of rotor-shaft system

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

IY

Z

X

V ON V

U A

RK X

S

M

YQ

I

O

W

P

B

LT

Z

JTransit (sweep)A

K

SX

R W

Figure 8 Solid186 element generated by the sweep method

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

I

V O

A

K

SX

R W

YZ

X

Transit (tetrahedral) (i + 1)

(i + 2)

(i + 3)

J K O N R AV Z

J K O N R A V Z

O N V

W U

P M XT

I

QY SK

BL

AR

P M X

W U

I

Q

Q

I

UM X

W

PB

L

SY

T

J Z

YS

T L B

Transit (pyramid)

Transit (prism)

Figure 9 Solid186 elements generated by tetrahedral pyramid and prism methods

Shock and Vibration 9

direction of the speed) which are marked as 1F and 2F inorder of increased frequency ere are also two backwardwhirls (the whirl direction of the rotor is opposite to therotation direction of the speed) that are marked as 3B and

4B respectively e synchronous whirl line is called thesynchronous excitation line In the figure the velocitiescorresponding to the intersection of the synchronouswhirl line and the frequency line of the forward whirl are

Temperature8177

Turbineside

Compressorside

(K)

7688

7199

6710

6222

5733

5244

4755

4266

3777

Figure 13 Postprocessing rotor temperature distribution

Figure 11 Global grid of rotor-shaft system

008

007

006

005

004

003

002

001

000

60000rpm

80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

ExperimentalCFD

(a)

014

012

010

008

006

004

002

000

60000rpm80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

10 11 12 13 14 1615 17

ExperimentalCFD

(b)

Figure 12 Numerical simulation verified by experiments (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

10 Shock and Vibration

Compressorside

Turbineside035 10

TToT times103 (K)

Figure 14 Rotor temperature distribution of Bohn [19]

times103

SWL (1X)

Normal temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 15 Campbell diagram showing whirl frequency and rotor-spin speed for the first four modes

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

Normal temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 16 Stability diagram of rotor-shaft system without considering temperature

Shock and Vibration 11

marked as Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 respectively and were calculatedas follows Ωcr1 5 0115 rpm and Ωcr2 43 622 rpmBecause the backward whirl could not be excited by theunbalanced force it is not marked or considered

When the speed was in the critical speed range be-tween Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in the 1F mode the whirling fre-quency had a clear increasing trend at trend may havebeen caused by floating ring bearings because in thecritical speed range of Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 the stiffness anddamping of the oil film changed sharply When the criticalspeed of Ωcr2 was exceeded the stiffness and damping ofthe oil film changed smoothly and the eddy frequency inthe corresponding 1F mode also increased at a constantrate

Figure 16 shows that the curve of the damping ratio ofthe four modes in case 1 changed with the rotation speede modal damping ratio is the ratio of actual damping tothe critical damping of a certain mode and the dampingratio is the decisive parameter to describe the stability Apositive damping ratio means that the rotor-shaft systemwas in a stable region when the vibration energy wasdissipated A negative damping ratio means that therotation energy supported the rotor rotation by addingvibration energy resulting in the rotor-shaft systembecoming unstable e point where the damping ratiocurve intersects with the zero line is the stable limit speed(SLS) e figure shows that the rotor-shaft system be-came unstable when SLS 1 56 550 rpm in 1F mode andthen became unstable when SLS 2 97 946 rpm in 2Fmode

Figure 17 shows the four modes close to the SLS 1stability limit speed at 55000 rpm e black dotted linerepresents the axis the combination of the orange line andthe orange sphere represents the starting position of thetrajectory and the incomplete track curve represents thewhirl direction e figure shows that the 1F mode wascylindrical thus combining rigid body motion with rotorbending Furthermore the rotor was close to the unstablestate at this time In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode e figure shows that the 3B mode wasconical with both rigid body motion and rotor bendingLastly the 4B mode was cylindrical with both rigid bodymotion and rotor bending

Figure 18 shows the four modes close to the SLS 2stability limit speed at 97946 rpme rotor was close to theunstable state at this time e 1F and 3B modes were cy-lindrical and conical combining rigid body motion androtor bending In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode

322 Effect of Temperature on the Campbell Diagram andStability Diagram We exported the temperature data ofeach node in Figure 12 and inserted the temperature valueinto the corresponding rotor-shaft system node through the

Ansys software commands functionWe analysed the criticalspeed and stability of the rotor-shaft system in the thermalenvironment

Figure 19 shows that temperature affected the intrinsicfrequency (whirl frequency) Compared with case 1 thewhirl-frequency curves in the 1F 2F and 3B modes wereslightly lower whereas for the 4B mode the whirl-fre-quency curve was much lower In the figure the startingpoint at the left end (when the rotating speed was 0 rpm)was taken as the observation object In case 1 the frequencywas 23009 Hz whereas in case 2 the frequency decreasedto 21825 Hz Because the temperature changed the ma-terialrsquos elastic modulus and Poissonrsquos ratio it affected itsstructural stiffness For higher-order frequencies the effecton frequency became greater as the order increasedHowever the effect on the critical speed Ωcr1 did notchange much whereas Ωcr2 decreased from 43622 rpm to41815 rpm is decrease was also caused by the intrinsicfrequency drop

Figure 20 shows the stability diagram in case 2 and thatthe temperature had an important effect on the dampingratio and SLS Compared with case 1 SLS 1 of the 1F modedecreased from the original 56550 rpm to 55078 rpm andmade the 1F mode enter the unstable region ahead of timee 2F mode change was more obvious and the same SLS 2decreased from the original 97946 rpm to 95969 rpm ereason for this can be explained by the following formulaξr (α2ωhr) + (βωhr2) Here ξr is the damping ratiocoefficient of the rth mode α is the mass damping coeffi-cient β is the stiffness damping coefficient and ωhr is thenatural frequency of the rth mode In most cases α (α 0)can be disregarded that is ξr βωhr2 β did not changewhereas ωhr decreased because of the effect of temperatureresulting in a decrease in ξr In other words SLS 1 and SLS 2in the 1F and 2F modes were reduced erefore whenpredicting the stability limit reset and dynamic perfor-mance of a turbocharger rotor the effect of temperatureshould have a great influence on the dynamic design of therotor

323 Unbalance Response Analysis We applied a dummyunbalance mass of 001 kg middot mm at node 2 and the fre-quency range of the steady-state synchronous responseanalysis was 0 to 2500Hz (corresponding speed range0 to 150 000 rpm) We then measured the response am-plitude of the turbine end floating ring bearing centerposition node 5 In Figure 21 case 1 is represented by ablack curve (normal temperature) and case 2 by a redcurve (high temperature) In case 1 (case 2) the curvesrepresent 6F 6B and 20F modes e frequency at thewave crest corresponding to the frequency correspondingto the fast reverse rotation (the frequency of the rotationspeed within one minute) in the case 1 (case 2) Campbelldiagram as shown in Figures 22 and 23) is similar to the

12 Shock and Vibration

black (red) number in Figure 20 Because the steeringmode is dominant in the response diagram the criticalspeeds Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in case 1 (case 2) 1F and 2F modesare not shown in the diagram and followed a phenom-enon similar to that reported by Chouksey and Roy[29 30] Because of the effect of temperature the steering

frequency of case 2 shifted to the left making the changeof response amplitude more obvious e responsevalue at the peak of the 6F and 6B modes decreased from0147mm to 0014 mm and that at the peak of the20F and 20B modes decreased from 0036 mm to00037 mm

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02

ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 17 Mode shapes at 55000 rpm (SLS 1) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

Shock and Vibration 13

324 Verification of Rotor FEM Natural frequency anal-ysis is very important as the basis of a dynamic analysisWe obtained the first two natural frequencies of the rotorby hammering experiments and verified them by nu-merical simulation Figure 24 shows the measured parts(rotor system) force hammer and piezoelectric acceler-ation sensor To reduce the measurement error rate we

adopted a sensor with a nonlinearity of less than 12 anda sensitivity of 10 mvg and placed the sensor in themiddle of the rotor shaft Table 6 compares the naturalfrequency experimental value with the simulated valuee experimental and simulated values of the first naturalfrequency were 1386Hz and 1453 Hz respectively esecond-order natural frequencies were 4100 Hz and

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

010203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash01

0001

0203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 18 Mode shapes at 97000 rpm (SLS 2) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

14 Shock and Vibration

4383 Hz respectively and the error rate was within 7But the higher mass of the accelerometer is the maincause of error value between the experimental value andthe simulated value

A more favorable verification was the oil film data shownin Figure 6e oil film data were experimental data providedby the turbocharger company In the simulation the oil filmwas the key factor in supporting or restraining the rotor isalso illustrates the reliability of the simulation method

times103

SWL (1X)

High temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 19 Effect of temperature on the Campbell diagram

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

High temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

Figure 20 Effect of temperature on stability diagram

5375Hz0036mm

8125Hz0147mm

Turbine side node 5X-direction

001

000500 1000

525Hz00037mm 7875Hz

0014mm

000

002

004

006

008

010

012

014

016

Am

plitu

de (m

m)

250 5000 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500Frequency (Hz)

Normal temperatureHigh temperature

Figure 21 Response comparison between case 1 and case 2 of theturbine side floating ring bearing center position (node 5)

Shock and Vibration 15

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 6: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

208

195

182

169

156

143

130

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

0 200 400 600Temperature (degC)

800 1000

028

027

026

025

024

023

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

Temperature (degC)

580

560

540

520

500

480

460

440Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)

420

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

24

22

20

18

16

14

12

10

0 200 400 600 800 1000

(a)

0 50 100 150 250 300 350200 400 450Temperature (degC)

The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

1500

1400

1300

1200

1100

1000

900

800

185

180

175

170

165

160

155

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

72

68

64

60

0 50 100 150 250 300200Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

10

05

00

ndash05

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

56

(b)

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

215

210

205

200

195

190

185

180

175

Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

033

032

030

031

029

028

027

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

0 100 300 400 500200Temperature (degC)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

) 1350

1200

1050

900

750

600

450 The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)40

36

32

28

24

20

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

0 200 600 800 1000400

(c)

Figure 5 Continued

6 Shock and Vibration

Writing (6) in state-space form yields

A _w(t) Bw(t) + F(t) (8)

where matrices A and B state vector w(t) and force vectorF(t) are

A 0 M

M C1113890 1113891

6atimes6a

B M 0

0 minusK1113890 1113891

6atimes6a

w(t) _q (t)

q (t)1113896 1113897

6atimes1F(t)

0

f(t)1113896 1113897

6atimes1

(9)

where 0 is an empty matrix of size 3a times 3a and an emptyvector of size 3a times 1

Figure 10 shows a simplified finite element model of therotor-shaft system e grey-blue points in the figure areused to observe the modal shapes line trajectories andunbalanced harmonic response analysis

Figure 11 shows the rotor finite element global grid etotal number of grids was 3176485 with 546067 gridnodes In the geometry software each portion of the rotorwas treated as a part to avoid extra contact stiffness in thefinite element simulation and prevent affecting the simu-lation accuracy

To aid the comparison we considered two cases in thisstudy case 1 the rotor-shaft system without the influence oftemperature and case 2 the rotor-shaft system affected bytemperature In the following sections r-th forward and r-thbackward modes are represented as ldquor-Frdquo and ldquor-Brdquo modesrespectively

3 Results and Discussion

31 Heat Transfer Results and Experimental VerificationAfter the calculation we verified the numerical results of themass flow and the supercharger ratio (expansion ratio) enumerical results agreed with the experimental data and theerror control was approximately 7 as Figure 12 shows

e temperature distribution of the rotor was obtainedthrough postprocessing as Figure 13 shows the temperaturedistribution law was the same as that in the Bohn [19] studyresult and is shown in Figure 14

Figures 13 and 14 show that the highest temperature wasat the outer edge of the turbine wheel blades and that thelowest temperature was at the compressor wheel Overallthe rotor had a large temperature gradient

32 Modal Results

321 Campbell Diagram and Stability Diagram of NormalTemperature Environment Figure 15 shows the Campbelldiagram of the rotor-shaft system in case 1 that iswithout considering the temperature e figure was

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

0 600 800 1000 1200400200Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

034

032

030

028

026

024

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

0 800 1000 1200 1400 1600400 600200Temperature (degC)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

800

750

700

650

600

550

500 The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)32

28

24

20

16

12

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

(d)

Figure 5 Material properties of rotor-shaft system as a function of temperature (Youngrsquos modulus Poisson ratio specific heat capacity andthermal conductivity) (a) K418 (b) ZL105 (c) 42CrMo (d) 316 stainless steel [25 26]

Table 4 Damping coefficient of each partPart name Damping coefficientTurbo impeller 0002Compressor impeller and nut 0001Shaft 0005rust bearing and seal sleeve 0005

Table 5 Parameters of floating ring bearing that supported therotor shaftParameter name Parameter valueFloating ring mass 517 gInner length 514mmOuter length 796mmInner diameter 750mmOuter diameter 129mm

Shock and Vibration 7

Y

Divide

Z

X

14 cylinder

Figure 7 Rotor shaft divided into four parts and 14 cylinder

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

ndash2000

ndash4000

ndash6000

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

ndash2

ndash4

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

(a)

3000

2000

1000

0

ndash1000

ndash2000

ndash3000

ndash4000

12

10

08

06

04

02

00

ndash02

ndash04

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

(b)

Figure 6 Total impedance of floating ring bearing (equivalent stiffness and damping coefficients) (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

8 Shock and Vibration

obtained from the whirl frequency (obtained from theimaginary part of the eigenvalue) and the rotational speedTo present a clear figure and express its basic

characteristics only the first four whirling directions aredescribed In the figure there are two forward whirls (thewhirl direction of the rotor agrees with the rotation

cyx cyx

cxy

cyy cyykyxkyx

kyy

kxxkxx kxycxx

cxy cxxkxy

kyy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Y

X Z

Figure 10 Finite element model of rotor-shaft system

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

IY

Z

X

V ON V

U A

RK X

S

M

YQ

I

O

W

P

B

LT

Z

JTransit (sweep)A

K

SX

R W

Figure 8 Solid186 element generated by the sweep method

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

I

V O

A

K

SX

R W

YZ

X

Transit (tetrahedral) (i + 1)

(i + 2)

(i + 3)

J K O N R AV Z

J K O N R A V Z

O N V

W U

P M XT

I

QY SK

BL

AR

P M X

W U

I

Q

Q

I

UM X

W

PB

L

SY

T

J Z

YS

T L B

Transit (pyramid)

Transit (prism)

Figure 9 Solid186 elements generated by tetrahedral pyramid and prism methods

Shock and Vibration 9

direction of the speed) which are marked as 1F and 2F inorder of increased frequency ere are also two backwardwhirls (the whirl direction of the rotor is opposite to therotation direction of the speed) that are marked as 3B and

4B respectively e synchronous whirl line is called thesynchronous excitation line In the figure the velocitiescorresponding to the intersection of the synchronouswhirl line and the frequency line of the forward whirl are

Temperature8177

Turbineside

Compressorside

(K)

7688

7199

6710

6222

5733

5244

4755

4266

3777

Figure 13 Postprocessing rotor temperature distribution

Figure 11 Global grid of rotor-shaft system

008

007

006

005

004

003

002

001

000

60000rpm

80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

ExperimentalCFD

(a)

014

012

010

008

006

004

002

000

60000rpm80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

10 11 12 13 14 1615 17

ExperimentalCFD

(b)

Figure 12 Numerical simulation verified by experiments (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

10 Shock and Vibration

Compressorside

Turbineside035 10

TToT times103 (K)

Figure 14 Rotor temperature distribution of Bohn [19]

times103

SWL (1X)

Normal temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 15 Campbell diagram showing whirl frequency and rotor-spin speed for the first four modes

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

Normal temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 16 Stability diagram of rotor-shaft system without considering temperature

Shock and Vibration 11

marked as Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 respectively and were calculatedas follows Ωcr1 5 0115 rpm and Ωcr2 43 622 rpmBecause the backward whirl could not be excited by theunbalanced force it is not marked or considered

When the speed was in the critical speed range be-tween Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in the 1F mode the whirling fre-quency had a clear increasing trend at trend may havebeen caused by floating ring bearings because in thecritical speed range of Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 the stiffness anddamping of the oil film changed sharply When the criticalspeed of Ωcr2 was exceeded the stiffness and damping ofthe oil film changed smoothly and the eddy frequency inthe corresponding 1F mode also increased at a constantrate

Figure 16 shows that the curve of the damping ratio ofthe four modes in case 1 changed with the rotation speede modal damping ratio is the ratio of actual damping tothe critical damping of a certain mode and the dampingratio is the decisive parameter to describe the stability Apositive damping ratio means that the rotor-shaft systemwas in a stable region when the vibration energy wasdissipated A negative damping ratio means that therotation energy supported the rotor rotation by addingvibration energy resulting in the rotor-shaft systembecoming unstable e point where the damping ratiocurve intersects with the zero line is the stable limit speed(SLS) e figure shows that the rotor-shaft system be-came unstable when SLS 1 56 550 rpm in 1F mode andthen became unstable when SLS 2 97 946 rpm in 2Fmode

Figure 17 shows the four modes close to the SLS 1stability limit speed at 55000 rpm e black dotted linerepresents the axis the combination of the orange line andthe orange sphere represents the starting position of thetrajectory and the incomplete track curve represents thewhirl direction e figure shows that the 1F mode wascylindrical thus combining rigid body motion with rotorbending Furthermore the rotor was close to the unstablestate at this time In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode e figure shows that the 3B mode wasconical with both rigid body motion and rotor bendingLastly the 4B mode was cylindrical with both rigid bodymotion and rotor bending

Figure 18 shows the four modes close to the SLS 2stability limit speed at 97946 rpme rotor was close to theunstable state at this time e 1F and 3B modes were cy-lindrical and conical combining rigid body motion androtor bending In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode

322 Effect of Temperature on the Campbell Diagram andStability Diagram We exported the temperature data ofeach node in Figure 12 and inserted the temperature valueinto the corresponding rotor-shaft system node through the

Ansys software commands functionWe analysed the criticalspeed and stability of the rotor-shaft system in the thermalenvironment

Figure 19 shows that temperature affected the intrinsicfrequency (whirl frequency) Compared with case 1 thewhirl-frequency curves in the 1F 2F and 3B modes wereslightly lower whereas for the 4B mode the whirl-fre-quency curve was much lower In the figure the startingpoint at the left end (when the rotating speed was 0 rpm)was taken as the observation object In case 1 the frequencywas 23009 Hz whereas in case 2 the frequency decreasedto 21825 Hz Because the temperature changed the ma-terialrsquos elastic modulus and Poissonrsquos ratio it affected itsstructural stiffness For higher-order frequencies the effecton frequency became greater as the order increasedHowever the effect on the critical speed Ωcr1 did notchange much whereas Ωcr2 decreased from 43622 rpm to41815 rpm is decrease was also caused by the intrinsicfrequency drop

Figure 20 shows the stability diagram in case 2 and thatthe temperature had an important effect on the dampingratio and SLS Compared with case 1 SLS 1 of the 1F modedecreased from the original 56550 rpm to 55078 rpm andmade the 1F mode enter the unstable region ahead of timee 2F mode change was more obvious and the same SLS 2decreased from the original 97946 rpm to 95969 rpm ereason for this can be explained by the following formulaξr (α2ωhr) + (βωhr2) Here ξr is the damping ratiocoefficient of the rth mode α is the mass damping coeffi-cient β is the stiffness damping coefficient and ωhr is thenatural frequency of the rth mode In most cases α (α 0)can be disregarded that is ξr βωhr2 β did not changewhereas ωhr decreased because of the effect of temperatureresulting in a decrease in ξr In other words SLS 1 and SLS 2in the 1F and 2F modes were reduced erefore whenpredicting the stability limit reset and dynamic perfor-mance of a turbocharger rotor the effect of temperatureshould have a great influence on the dynamic design of therotor

323 Unbalance Response Analysis We applied a dummyunbalance mass of 001 kg middot mm at node 2 and the fre-quency range of the steady-state synchronous responseanalysis was 0 to 2500Hz (corresponding speed range0 to 150 000 rpm) We then measured the response am-plitude of the turbine end floating ring bearing centerposition node 5 In Figure 21 case 1 is represented by ablack curve (normal temperature) and case 2 by a redcurve (high temperature) In case 1 (case 2) the curvesrepresent 6F 6B and 20F modes e frequency at thewave crest corresponding to the frequency correspondingto the fast reverse rotation (the frequency of the rotationspeed within one minute) in the case 1 (case 2) Campbelldiagram as shown in Figures 22 and 23) is similar to the

12 Shock and Vibration

black (red) number in Figure 20 Because the steeringmode is dominant in the response diagram the criticalspeeds Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in case 1 (case 2) 1F and 2F modesare not shown in the diagram and followed a phenom-enon similar to that reported by Chouksey and Roy[29 30] Because of the effect of temperature the steering

frequency of case 2 shifted to the left making the changeof response amplitude more obvious e responsevalue at the peak of the 6F and 6B modes decreased from0147mm to 0014 mm and that at the peak of the20F and 20B modes decreased from 0036 mm to00037 mm

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02

ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 17 Mode shapes at 55000 rpm (SLS 1) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

Shock and Vibration 13

324 Verification of Rotor FEM Natural frequency anal-ysis is very important as the basis of a dynamic analysisWe obtained the first two natural frequencies of the rotorby hammering experiments and verified them by nu-merical simulation Figure 24 shows the measured parts(rotor system) force hammer and piezoelectric acceler-ation sensor To reduce the measurement error rate we

adopted a sensor with a nonlinearity of less than 12 anda sensitivity of 10 mvg and placed the sensor in themiddle of the rotor shaft Table 6 compares the naturalfrequency experimental value with the simulated valuee experimental and simulated values of the first naturalfrequency were 1386Hz and 1453 Hz respectively esecond-order natural frequencies were 4100 Hz and

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

010203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash01

0001

0203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 18 Mode shapes at 97000 rpm (SLS 2) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

14 Shock and Vibration

4383 Hz respectively and the error rate was within 7But the higher mass of the accelerometer is the maincause of error value between the experimental value andthe simulated value

A more favorable verification was the oil film data shownin Figure 6e oil film data were experimental data providedby the turbocharger company In the simulation the oil filmwas the key factor in supporting or restraining the rotor isalso illustrates the reliability of the simulation method

times103

SWL (1X)

High temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 19 Effect of temperature on the Campbell diagram

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

High temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

Figure 20 Effect of temperature on stability diagram

5375Hz0036mm

8125Hz0147mm

Turbine side node 5X-direction

001

000500 1000

525Hz00037mm 7875Hz

0014mm

000

002

004

006

008

010

012

014

016

Am

plitu

de (m

m)

250 5000 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500Frequency (Hz)

Normal temperatureHigh temperature

Figure 21 Response comparison between case 1 and case 2 of theturbine side floating ring bearing center position (node 5)

Shock and Vibration 15

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 7: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

Writing (6) in state-space form yields

A _w(t) Bw(t) + F(t) (8)

where matrices A and B state vector w(t) and force vectorF(t) are

A 0 M

M C1113890 1113891

6atimes6a

B M 0

0 minusK1113890 1113891

6atimes6a

w(t) _q (t)

q (t)1113896 1113897

6atimes1F(t)

0

f(t)1113896 1113897

6atimes1

(9)

where 0 is an empty matrix of size 3a times 3a and an emptyvector of size 3a times 1

Figure 10 shows a simplified finite element model of therotor-shaft system e grey-blue points in the figure areused to observe the modal shapes line trajectories andunbalanced harmonic response analysis

Figure 11 shows the rotor finite element global grid etotal number of grids was 3176485 with 546067 gridnodes In the geometry software each portion of the rotorwas treated as a part to avoid extra contact stiffness in thefinite element simulation and prevent affecting the simu-lation accuracy

To aid the comparison we considered two cases in thisstudy case 1 the rotor-shaft system without the influence oftemperature and case 2 the rotor-shaft system affected bytemperature In the following sections r-th forward and r-thbackward modes are represented as ldquor-Frdquo and ldquor-Brdquo modesrespectively

3 Results and Discussion

31 Heat Transfer Results and Experimental VerificationAfter the calculation we verified the numerical results of themass flow and the supercharger ratio (expansion ratio) enumerical results agreed with the experimental data and theerror control was approximately 7 as Figure 12 shows

e temperature distribution of the rotor was obtainedthrough postprocessing as Figure 13 shows the temperaturedistribution law was the same as that in the Bohn [19] studyresult and is shown in Figure 14

Figures 13 and 14 show that the highest temperature wasat the outer edge of the turbine wheel blades and that thelowest temperature was at the compressor wheel Overallthe rotor had a large temperature gradient

32 Modal Results

321 Campbell Diagram and Stability Diagram of NormalTemperature Environment Figure 15 shows the Campbelldiagram of the rotor-shaft system in case 1 that iswithout considering the temperature e figure was

Youn

grsquos m

odul

us (1

09 Pa)

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

0 600 800 1000 1200400200Temperature (degC)

Poiss

onrsquos

ratio

034

032

030

028

026

024

Youngrsquos modulusPoissonrsquos ratio

0 800 1000 1200 1400 1600400 600200Temperature (degC)

Spec

ific h

eat c

apac

ity (J

[Kgmiddot

degC]ndash1

)

800

750

700

650

600

550

500 The

rmal

cond

uctiv

ity (W

[mmiddotdegC

]ndash1)32

28

24

20

16

12

Specific heat capacityThermal conductivity

(d)

Figure 5 Material properties of rotor-shaft system as a function of temperature (Youngrsquos modulus Poisson ratio specific heat capacity andthermal conductivity) (a) K418 (b) ZL105 (c) 42CrMo (d) 316 stainless steel [25 26]

Table 4 Damping coefficient of each partPart name Damping coefficientTurbo impeller 0002Compressor impeller and nut 0001Shaft 0005rust bearing and seal sleeve 0005

Table 5 Parameters of floating ring bearing that supported therotor shaftParameter name Parameter valueFloating ring mass 517 gInner length 514mmOuter length 796mmInner diameter 750mmOuter diameter 129mm

Shock and Vibration 7

Y

Divide

Z

X

14 cylinder

Figure 7 Rotor shaft divided into four parts and 14 cylinder

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

ndash2000

ndash4000

ndash6000

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

ndash2

ndash4

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

(a)

3000

2000

1000

0

ndash1000

ndash2000

ndash3000

ndash4000

12

10

08

06

04

02

00

ndash02

ndash04

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

(b)

Figure 6 Total impedance of floating ring bearing (equivalent stiffness and damping coefficients) (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

8 Shock and Vibration

obtained from the whirl frequency (obtained from theimaginary part of the eigenvalue) and the rotational speedTo present a clear figure and express its basic

characteristics only the first four whirling directions aredescribed In the figure there are two forward whirls (thewhirl direction of the rotor agrees with the rotation

cyx cyx

cxy

cyy cyykyxkyx

kyy

kxxkxx kxycxx

cxy cxxkxy

kyy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Y

X Z

Figure 10 Finite element model of rotor-shaft system

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

IY

Z

X

V ON V

U A

RK X

S

M

YQ

I

O

W

P

B

LT

Z

JTransit (sweep)A

K

SX

R W

Figure 8 Solid186 element generated by the sweep method

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

I

V O

A

K

SX

R W

YZ

X

Transit (tetrahedral) (i + 1)

(i + 2)

(i + 3)

J K O N R AV Z

J K O N R A V Z

O N V

W U

P M XT

I

QY SK

BL

AR

P M X

W U

I

Q

Q

I

UM X

W

PB

L

SY

T

J Z

YS

T L B

Transit (pyramid)

Transit (prism)

Figure 9 Solid186 elements generated by tetrahedral pyramid and prism methods

Shock and Vibration 9

direction of the speed) which are marked as 1F and 2F inorder of increased frequency ere are also two backwardwhirls (the whirl direction of the rotor is opposite to therotation direction of the speed) that are marked as 3B and

4B respectively e synchronous whirl line is called thesynchronous excitation line In the figure the velocitiescorresponding to the intersection of the synchronouswhirl line and the frequency line of the forward whirl are

Temperature8177

Turbineside

Compressorside

(K)

7688

7199

6710

6222

5733

5244

4755

4266

3777

Figure 13 Postprocessing rotor temperature distribution

Figure 11 Global grid of rotor-shaft system

008

007

006

005

004

003

002

001

000

60000rpm

80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

ExperimentalCFD

(a)

014

012

010

008

006

004

002

000

60000rpm80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

10 11 12 13 14 1615 17

ExperimentalCFD

(b)

Figure 12 Numerical simulation verified by experiments (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

10 Shock and Vibration

Compressorside

Turbineside035 10

TToT times103 (K)

Figure 14 Rotor temperature distribution of Bohn [19]

times103

SWL (1X)

Normal temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 15 Campbell diagram showing whirl frequency and rotor-spin speed for the first four modes

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

Normal temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 16 Stability diagram of rotor-shaft system without considering temperature

Shock and Vibration 11

marked as Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 respectively and were calculatedas follows Ωcr1 5 0115 rpm and Ωcr2 43 622 rpmBecause the backward whirl could not be excited by theunbalanced force it is not marked or considered

When the speed was in the critical speed range be-tween Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in the 1F mode the whirling fre-quency had a clear increasing trend at trend may havebeen caused by floating ring bearings because in thecritical speed range of Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 the stiffness anddamping of the oil film changed sharply When the criticalspeed of Ωcr2 was exceeded the stiffness and damping ofthe oil film changed smoothly and the eddy frequency inthe corresponding 1F mode also increased at a constantrate

Figure 16 shows that the curve of the damping ratio ofthe four modes in case 1 changed with the rotation speede modal damping ratio is the ratio of actual damping tothe critical damping of a certain mode and the dampingratio is the decisive parameter to describe the stability Apositive damping ratio means that the rotor-shaft systemwas in a stable region when the vibration energy wasdissipated A negative damping ratio means that therotation energy supported the rotor rotation by addingvibration energy resulting in the rotor-shaft systembecoming unstable e point where the damping ratiocurve intersects with the zero line is the stable limit speed(SLS) e figure shows that the rotor-shaft system be-came unstable when SLS 1 56 550 rpm in 1F mode andthen became unstable when SLS 2 97 946 rpm in 2Fmode

Figure 17 shows the four modes close to the SLS 1stability limit speed at 55000 rpm e black dotted linerepresents the axis the combination of the orange line andthe orange sphere represents the starting position of thetrajectory and the incomplete track curve represents thewhirl direction e figure shows that the 1F mode wascylindrical thus combining rigid body motion with rotorbending Furthermore the rotor was close to the unstablestate at this time In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode e figure shows that the 3B mode wasconical with both rigid body motion and rotor bendingLastly the 4B mode was cylindrical with both rigid bodymotion and rotor bending

Figure 18 shows the four modes close to the SLS 2stability limit speed at 97946 rpme rotor was close to theunstable state at this time e 1F and 3B modes were cy-lindrical and conical combining rigid body motion androtor bending In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode

322 Effect of Temperature on the Campbell Diagram andStability Diagram We exported the temperature data ofeach node in Figure 12 and inserted the temperature valueinto the corresponding rotor-shaft system node through the

Ansys software commands functionWe analysed the criticalspeed and stability of the rotor-shaft system in the thermalenvironment

Figure 19 shows that temperature affected the intrinsicfrequency (whirl frequency) Compared with case 1 thewhirl-frequency curves in the 1F 2F and 3B modes wereslightly lower whereas for the 4B mode the whirl-fre-quency curve was much lower In the figure the startingpoint at the left end (when the rotating speed was 0 rpm)was taken as the observation object In case 1 the frequencywas 23009 Hz whereas in case 2 the frequency decreasedto 21825 Hz Because the temperature changed the ma-terialrsquos elastic modulus and Poissonrsquos ratio it affected itsstructural stiffness For higher-order frequencies the effecton frequency became greater as the order increasedHowever the effect on the critical speed Ωcr1 did notchange much whereas Ωcr2 decreased from 43622 rpm to41815 rpm is decrease was also caused by the intrinsicfrequency drop

Figure 20 shows the stability diagram in case 2 and thatthe temperature had an important effect on the dampingratio and SLS Compared with case 1 SLS 1 of the 1F modedecreased from the original 56550 rpm to 55078 rpm andmade the 1F mode enter the unstable region ahead of timee 2F mode change was more obvious and the same SLS 2decreased from the original 97946 rpm to 95969 rpm ereason for this can be explained by the following formulaξr (α2ωhr) + (βωhr2) Here ξr is the damping ratiocoefficient of the rth mode α is the mass damping coeffi-cient β is the stiffness damping coefficient and ωhr is thenatural frequency of the rth mode In most cases α (α 0)can be disregarded that is ξr βωhr2 β did not changewhereas ωhr decreased because of the effect of temperatureresulting in a decrease in ξr In other words SLS 1 and SLS 2in the 1F and 2F modes were reduced erefore whenpredicting the stability limit reset and dynamic perfor-mance of a turbocharger rotor the effect of temperatureshould have a great influence on the dynamic design of therotor

323 Unbalance Response Analysis We applied a dummyunbalance mass of 001 kg middot mm at node 2 and the fre-quency range of the steady-state synchronous responseanalysis was 0 to 2500Hz (corresponding speed range0 to 150 000 rpm) We then measured the response am-plitude of the turbine end floating ring bearing centerposition node 5 In Figure 21 case 1 is represented by ablack curve (normal temperature) and case 2 by a redcurve (high temperature) In case 1 (case 2) the curvesrepresent 6F 6B and 20F modes e frequency at thewave crest corresponding to the frequency correspondingto the fast reverse rotation (the frequency of the rotationspeed within one minute) in the case 1 (case 2) Campbelldiagram as shown in Figures 22 and 23) is similar to the

12 Shock and Vibration

black (red) number in Figure 20 Because the steeringmode is dominant in the response diagram the criticalspeeds Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in case 1 (case 2) 1F and 2F modesare not shown in the diagram and followed a phenom-enon similar to that reported by Chouksey and Roy[29 30] Because of the effect of temperature the steering

frequency of case 2 shifted to the left making the changeof response amplitude more obvious e responsevalue at the peak of the 6F and 6B modes decreased from0147mm to 0014 mm and that at the peak of the20F and 20B modes decreased from 0036 mm to00037 mm

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02

ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 17 Mode shapes at 55000 rpm (SLS 1) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

Shock and Vibration 13

324 Verification of Rotor FEM Natural frequency anal-ysis is very important as the basis of a dynamic analysisWe obtained the first two natural frequencies of the rotorby hammering experiments and verified them by nu-merical simulation Figure 24 shows the measured parts(rotor system) force hammer and piezoelectric acceler-ation sensor To reduce the measurement error rate we

adopted a sensor with a nonlinearity of less than 12 anda sensitivity of 10 mvg and placed the sensor in themiddle of the rotor shaft Table 6 compares the naturalfrequency experimental value with the simulated valuee experimental and simulated values of the first naturalfrequency were 1386Hz and 1453 Hz respectively esecond-order natural frequencies were 4100 Hz and

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

010203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash01

0001

0203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 18 Mode shapes at 97000 rpm (SLS 2) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

14 Shock and Vibration

4383 Hz respectively and the error rate was within 7But the higher mass of the accelerometer is the maincause of error value between the experimental value andthe simulated value

A more favorable verification was the oil film data shownin Figure 6e oil film data were experimental data providedby the turbocharger company In the simulation the oil filmwas the key factor in supporting or restraining the rotor isalso illustrates the reliability of the simulation method

times103

SWL (1X)

High temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 19 Effect of temperature on the Campbell diagram

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

High temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

Figure 20 Effect of temperature on stability diagram

5375Hz0036mm

8125Hz0147mm

Turbine side node 5X-direction

001

000500 1000

525Hz00037mm 7875Hz

0014mm

000

002

004

006

008

010

012

014

016

Am

plitu

de (m

m)

250 5000 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500Frequency (Hz)

Normal temperatureHigh temperature

Figure 21 Response comparison between case 1 and case 2 of theturbine side floating ring bearing center position (node 5)

Shock and Vibration 15

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 8: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

Y

Divide

Z

X

14 cylinder

Figure 7 Rotor shaft divided into four parts and 14 cylinder

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

ndash2000

ndash4000

ndash6000

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

ndash2

ndash4

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

Turbine sidefloating ring bearing

(a)

3000

2000

1000

0

ndash1000

ndash2000

ndash3000

ndash4000

12

10

08

06

04

02

00

ndash02

ndash04

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Compressor sidefloating ring bearing

Stiff

ness

coef

ficie

nt (N

mm

ndash1)

Dam

ping

coef

ficie

nt (N

middots m

mndash1

)

Rotor speed (rpm) times103

kxxkyy

kxykyx

cxxcyy

cxycyx

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180Rotor speed (rpm) times103

0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180

(b)

Figure 6 Total impedance of floating ring bearing (equivalent stiffness and damping coefficients) (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

8 Shock and Vibration

obtained from the whirl frequency (obtained from theimaginary part of the eigenvalue) and the rotational speedTo present a clear figure and express its basic

characteristics only the first four whirling directions aredescribed In the figure there are two forward whirls (thewhirl direction of the rotor agrees with the rotation

cyx cyx

cxy

cyy cyykyxkyx

kyy

kxxkxx kxycxx

cxy cxxkxy

kyy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Y

X Z

Figure 10 Finite element model of rotor-shaft system

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

IY

Z

X

V ON V

U A

RK X

S

M

YQ

I

O

W

P

B

LT

Z

JTransit (sweep)A

K

SX

R W

Figure 8 Solid186 element generated by the sweep method

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

I

V O

A

K

SX

R W

YZ

X

Transit (tetrahedral) (i + 1)

(i + 2)

(i + 3)

J K O N R AV Z

J K O N R A V Z

O N V

W U

P M XT

I

QY SK

BL

AR

P M X

W U

I

Q

Q

I

UM X

W

PB

L

SY

T

J Z

YS

T L B

Transit (pyramid)

Transit (prism)

Figure 9 Solid186 elements generated by tetrahedral pyramid and prism methods

Shock and Vibration 9

direction of the speed) which are marked as 1F and 2F inorder of increased frequency ere are also two backwardwhirls (the whirl direction of the rotor is opposite to therotation direction of the speed) that are marked as 3B and

4B respectively e synchronous whirl line is called thesynchronous excitation line In the figure the velocitiescorresponding to the intersection of the synchronouswhirl line and the frequency line of the forward whirl are

Temperature8177

Turbineside

Compressorside

(K)

7688

7199

6710

6222

5733

5244

4755

4266

3777

Figure 13 Postprocessing rotor temperature distribution

Figure 11 Global grid of rotor-shaft system

008

007

006

005

004

003

002

001

000

60000rpm

80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

ExperimentalCFD

(a)

014

012

010

008

006

004

002

000

60000rpm80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

10 11 12 13 14 1615 17

ExperimentalCFD

(b)

Figure 12 Numerical simulation verified by experiments (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

10 Shock and Vibration

Compressorside

Turbineside035 10

TToT times103 (K)

Figure 14 Rotor temperature distribution of Bohn [19]

times103

SWL (1X)

Normal temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 15 Campbell diagram showing whirl frequency and rotor-spin speed for the first four modes

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

Normal temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 16 Stability diagram of rotor-shaft system without considering temperature

Shock and Vibration 11

marked as Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 respectively and were calculatedas follows Ωcr1 5 0115 rpm and Ωcr2 43 622 rpmBecause the backward whirl could not be excited by theunbalanced force it is not marked or considered

When the speed was in the critical speed range be-tween Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in the 1F mode the whirling fre-quency had a clear increasing trend at trend may havebeen caused by floating ring bearings because in thecritical speed range of Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 the stiffness anddamping of the oil film changed sharply When the criticalspeed of Ωcr2 was exceeded the stiffness and damping ofthe oil film changed smoothly and the eddy frequency inthe corresponding 1F mode also increased at a constantrate

Figure 16 shows that the curve of the damping ratio ofthe four modes in case 1 changed with the rotation speede modal damping ratio is the ratio of actual damping tothe critical damping of a certain mode and the dampingratio is the decisive parameter to describe the stability Apositive damping ratio means that the rotor-shaft systemwas in a stable region when the vibration energy wasdissipated A negative damping ratio means that therotation energy supported the rotor rotation by addingvibration energy resulting in the rotor-shaft systembecoming unstable e point where the damping ratiocurve intersects with the zero line is the stable limit speed(SLS) e figure shows that the rotor-shaft system be-came unstable when SLS 1 56 550 rpm in 1F mode andthen became unstable when SLS 2 97 946 rpm in 2Fmode

Figure 17 shows the four modes close to the SLS 1stability limit speed at 55000 rpm e black dotted linerepresents the axis the combination of the orange line andthe orange sphere represents the starting position of thetrajectory and the incomplete track curve represents thewhirl direction e figure shows that the 1F mode wascylindrical thus combining rigid body motion with rotorbending Furthermore the rotor was close to the unstablestate at this time In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode e figure shows that the 3B mode wasconical with both rigid body motion and rotor bendingLastly the 4B mode was cylindrical with both rigid bodymotion and rotor bending

Figure 18 shows the four modes close to the SLS 2stability limit speed at 97946 rpme rotor was close to theunstable state at this time e 1F and 3B modes were cy-lindrical and conical combining rigid body motion androtor bending In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode

322 Effect of Temperature on the Campbell Diagram andStability Diagram We exported the temperature data ofeach node in Figure 12 and inserted the temperature valueinto the corresponding rotor-shaft system node through the

Ansys software commands functionWe analysed the criticalspeed and stability of the rotor-shaft system in the thermalenvironment

Figure 19 shows that temperature affected the intrinsicfrequency (whirl frequency) Compared with case 1 thewhirl-frequency curves in the 1F 2F and 3B modes wereslightly lower whereas for the 4B mode the whirl-fre-quency curve was much lower In the figure the startingpoint at the left end (when the rotating speed was 0 rpm)was taken as the observation object In case 1 the frequencywas 23009 Hz whereas in case 2 the frequency decreasedto 21825 Hz Because the temperature changed the ma-terialrsquos elastic modulus and Poissonrsquos ratio it affected itsstructural stiffness For higher-order frequencies the effecton frequency became greater as the order increasedHowever the effect on the critical speed Ωcr1 did notchange much whereas Ωcr2 decreased from 43622 rpm to41815 rpm is decrease was also caused by the intrinsicfrequency drop

Figure 20 shows the stability diagram in case 2 and thatthe temperature had an important effect on the dampingratio and SLS Compared with case 1 SLS 1 of the 1F modedecreased from the original 56550 rpm to 55078 rpm andmade the 1F mode enter the unstable region ahead of timee 2F mode change was more obvious and the same SLS 2decreased from the original 97946 rpm to 95969 rpm ereason for this can be explained by the following formulaξr (α2ωhr) + (βωhr2) Here ξr is the damping ratiocoefficient of the rth mode α is the mass damping coeffi-cient β is the stiffness damping coefficient and ωhr is thenatural frequency of the rth mode In most cases α (α 0)can be disregarded that is ξr βωhr2 β did not changewhereas ωhr decreased because of the effect of temperatureresulting in a decrease in ξr In other words SLS 1 and SLS 2in the 1F and 2F modes were reduced erefore whenpredicting the stability limit reset and dynamic perfor-mance of a turbocharger rotor the effect of temperatureshould have a great influence on the dynamic design of therotor

323 Unbalance Response Analysis We applied a dummyunbalance mass of 001 kg middot mm at node 2 and the fre-quency range of the steady-state synchronous responseanalysis was 0 to 2500Hz (corresponding speed range0 to 150 000 rpm) We then measured the response am-plitude of the turbine end floating ring bearing centerposition node 5 In Figure 21 case 1 is represented by ablack curve (normal temperature) and case 2 by a redcurve (high temperature) In case 1 (case 2) the curvesrepresent 6F 6B and 20F modes e frequency at thewave crest corresponding to the frequency correspondingto the fast reverse rotation (the frequency of the rotationspeed within one minute) in the case 1 (case 2) Campbelldiagram as shown in Figures 22 and 23) is similar to the

12 Shock and Vibration

black (red) number in Figure 20 Because the steeringmode is dominant in the response diagram the criticalspeeds Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in case 1 (case 2) 1F and 2F modesare not shown in the diagram and followed a phenom-enon similar to that reported by Chouksey and Roy[29 30] Because of the effect of temperature the steering

frequency of case 2 shifted to the left making the changeof response amplitude more obvious e responsevalue at the peak of the 6F and 6B modes decreased from0147mm to 0014 mm and that at the peak of the20F and 20B modes decreased from 0036 mm to00037 mm

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02

ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 17 Mode shapes at 55000 rpm (SLS 1) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

Shock and Vibration 13

324 Verification of Rotor FEM Natural frequency anal-ysis is very important as the basis of a dynamic analysisWe obtained the first two natural frequencies of the rotorby hammering experiments and verified them by nu-merical simulation Figure 24 shows the measured parts(rotor system) force hammer and piezoelectric acceler-ation sensor To reduce the measurement error rate we

adopted a sensor with a nonlinearity of less than 12 anda sensitivity of 10 mvg and placed the sensor in themiddle of the rotor shaft Table 6 compares the naturalfrequency experimental value with the simulated valuee experimental and simulated values of the first naturalfrequency were 1386Hz and 1453 Hz respectively esecond-order natural frequencies were 4100 Hz and

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

010203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash01

0001

0203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 18 Mode shapes at 97000 rpm (SLS 2) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

14 Shock and Vibration

4383 Hz respectively and the error rate was within 7But the higher mass of the accelerometer is the maincause of error value between the experimental value andthe simulated value

A more favorable verification was the oil film data shownin Figure 6e oil film data were experimental data providedby the turbocharger company In the simulation the oil filmwas the key factor in supporting or restraining the rotor isalso illustrates the reliability of the simulation method

times103

SWL (1X)

High temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 19 Effect of temperature on the Campbell diagram

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

High temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

Figure 20 Effect of temperature on stability diagram

5375Hz0036mm

8125Hz0147mm

Turbine side node 5X-direction

001

000500 1000

525Hz00037mm 7875Hz

0014mm

000

002

004

006

008

010

012

014

016

Am

plitu

de (m

m)

250 5000 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500Frequency (Hz)

Normal temperatureHigh temperature

Figure 21 Response comparison between case 1 and case 2 of theturbine side floating ring bearing center position (node 5)

Shock and Vibration 15

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 9: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

obtained from the whirl frequency (obtained from theimaginary part of the eigenvalue) and the rotational speedTo present a clear figure and express its basic

characteristics only the first four whirling directions aredescribed In the figure there are two forward whirls (thewhirl direction of the rotor agrees with the rotation

cyx cyx

cxy

cyy cyykyxkyx

kyy

kxxkxx kxycxx

cxy cxxkxy

kyy

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

Y

X Z

Figure 10 Finite element model of rotor-shaft system

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

IY

Z

X

V ON V

U A

RK X

S

M

YQ

I

O

W

P

B

LT

Z

JTransit (sweep)A

K

SX

R W

Figure 8 Solid186 element generated by the sweep method

N

Z

U

J

QM

Y

T L

B

P

I

V O

A

K

SX

R W

YZ

X

Transit (tetrahedral) (i + 1)

(i + 2)

(i + 3)

J K O N R AV Z

J K O N R A V Z

O N V

W U

P M XT

I

QY SK

BL

AR

P M X

W U

I

Q

Q

I

UM X

W

PB

L

SY

T

J Z

YS

T L B

Transit (pyramid)

Transit (prism)

Figure 9 Solid186 elements generated by tetrahedral pyramid and prism methods

Shock and Vibration 9

direction of the speed) which are marked as 1F and 2F inorder of increased frequency ere are also two backwardwhirls (the whirl direction of the rotor is opposite to therotation direction of the speed) that are marked as 3B and

4B respectively e synchronous whirl line is called thesynchronous excitation line In the figure the velocitiescorresponding to the intersection of the synchronouswhirl line and the frequency line of the forward whirl are

Temperature8177

Turbineside

Compressorside

(K)

7688

7199

6710

6222

5733

5244

4755

4266

3777

Figure 13 Postprocessing rotor temperature distribution

Figure 11 Global grid of rotor-shaft system

008

007

006

005

004

003

002

001

000

60000rpm

80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

ExperimentalCFD

(a)

014

012

010

008

006

004

002

000

60000rpm80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

10 11 12 13 14 1615 17

ExperimentalCFD

(b)

Figure 12 Numerical simulation verified by experiments (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

10 Shock and Vibration

Compressorside

Turbineside035 10

TToT times103 (K)

Figure 14 Rotor temperature distribution of Bohn [19]

times103

SWL (1X)

Normal temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 15 Campbell diagram showing whirl frequency and rotor-spin speed for the first four modes

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

Normal temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 16 Stability diagram of rotor-shaft system without considering temperature

Shock and Vibration 11

marked as Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 respectively and were calculatedas follows Ωcr1 5 0115 rpm and Ωcr2 43 622 rpmBecause the backward whirl could not be excited by theunbalanced force it is not marked or considered

When the speed was in the critical speed range be-tween Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in the 1F mode the whirling fre-quency had a clear increasing trend at trend may havebeen caused by floating ring bearings because in thecritical speed range of Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 the stiffness anddamping of the oil film changed sharply When the criticalspeed of Ωcr2 was exceeded the stiffness and damping ofthe oil film changed smoothly and the eddy frequency inthe corresponding 1F mode also increased at a constantrate

Figure 16 shows that the curve of the damping ratio ofthe four modes in case 1 changed with the rotation speede modal damping ratio is the ratio of actual damping tothe critical damping of a certain mode and the dampingratio is the decisive parameter to describe the stability Apositive damping ratio means that the rotor-shaft systemwas in a stable region when the vibration energy wasdissipated A negative damping ratio means that therotation energy supported the rotor rotation by addingvibration energy resulting in the rotor-shaft systembecoming unstable e point where the damping ratiocurve intersects with the zero line is the stable limit speed(SLS) e figure shows that the rotor-shaft system be-came unstable when SLS 1 56 550 rpm in 1F mode andthen became unstable when SLS 2 97 946 rpm in 2Fmode

Figure 17 shows the four modes close to the SLS 1stability limit speed at 55000 rpm e black dotted linerepresents the axis the combination of the orange line andthe orange sphere represents the starting position of thetrajectory and the incomplete track curve represents thewhirl direction e figure shows that the 1F mode wascylindrical thus combining rigid body motion with rotorbending Furthermore the rotor was close to the unstablestate at this time In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode e figure shows that the 3B mode wasconical with both rigid body motion and rotor bendingLastly the 4B mode was cylindrical with both rigid bodymotion and rotor bending

Figure 18 shows the four modes close to the SLS 2stability limit speed at 97946 rpme rotor was close to theunstable state at this time e 1F and 3B modes were cy-lindrical and conical combining rigid body motion androtor bending In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode

322 Effect of Temperature on the Campbell Diagram andStability Diagram We exported the temperature data ofeach node in Figure 12 and inserted the temperature valueinto the corresponding rotor-shaft system node through the

Ansys software commands functionWe analysed the criticalspeed and stability of the rotor-shaft system in the thermalenvironment

Figure 19 shows that temperature affected the intrinsicfrequency (whirl frequency) Compared with case 1 thewhirl-frequency curves in the 1F 2F and 3B modes wereslightly lower whereas for the 4B mode the whirl-fre-quency curve was much lower In the figure the startingpoint at the left end (when the rotating speed was 0 rpm)was taken as the observation object In case 1 the frequencywas 23009 Hz whereas in case 2 the frequency decreasedto 21825 Hz Because the temperature changed the ma-terialrsquos elastic modulus and Poissonrsquos ratio it affected itsstructural stiffness For higher-order frequencies the effecton frequency became greater as the order increasedHowever the effect on the critical speed Ωcr1 did notchange much whereas Ωcr2 decreased from 43622 rpm to41815 rpm is decrease was also caused by the intrinsicfrequency drop

Figure 20 shows the stability diagram in case 2 and thatthe temperature had an important effect on the dampingratio and SLS Compared with case 1 SLS 1 of the 1F modedecreased from the original 56550 rpm to 55078 rpm andmade the 1F mode enter the unstable region ahead of timee 2F mode change was more obvious and the same SLS 2decreased from the original 97946 rpm to 95969 rpm ereason for this can be explained by the following formulaξr (α2ωhr) + (βωhr2) Here ξr is the damping ratiocoefficient of the rth mode α is the mass damping coeffi-cient β is the stiffness damping coefficient and ωhr is thenatural frequency of the rth mode In most cases α (α 0)can be disregarded that is ξr βωhr2 β did not changewhereas ωhr decreased because of the effect of temperatureresulting in a decrease in ξr In other words SLS 1 and SLS 2in the 1F and 2F modes were reduced erefore whenpredicting the stability limit reset and dynamic perfor-mance of a turbocharger rotor the effect of temperatureshould have a great influence on the dynamic design of therotor

323 Unbalance Response Analysis We applied a dummyunbalance mass of 001 kg middot mm at node 2 and the fre-quency range of the steady-state synchronous responseanalysis was 0 to 2500Hz (corresponding speed range0 to 150 000 rpm) We then measured the response am-plitude of the turbine end floating ring bearing centerposition node 5 In Figure 21 case 1 is represented by ablack curve (normal temperature) and case 2 by a redcurve (high temperature) In case 1 (case 2) the curvesrepresent 6F 6B and 20F modes e frequency at thewave crest corresponding to the frequency correspondingto the fast reverse rotation (the frequency of the rotationspeed within one minute) in the case 1 (case 2) Campbelldiagram as shown in Figures 22 and 23) is similar to the

12 Shock and Vibration

black (red) number in Figure 20 Because the steeringmode is dominant in the response diagram the criticalspeeds Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in case 1 (case 2) 1F and 2F modesare not shown in the diagram and followed a phenom-enon similar to that reported by Chouksey and Roy[29 30] Because of the effect of temperature the steering

frequency of case 2 shifted to the left making the changeof response amplitude more obvious e responsevalue at the peak of the 6F and 6B modes decreased from0147mm to 0014 mm and that at the peak of the20F and 20B modes decreased from 0036 mm to00037 mm

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02

ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 17 Mode shapes at 55000 rpm (SLS 1) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

Shock and Vibration 13

324 Verification of Rotor FEM Natural frequency anal-ysis is very important as the basis of a dynamic analysisWe obtained the first two natural frequencies of the rotorby hammering experiments and verified them by nu-merical simulation Figure 24 shows the measured parts(rotor system) force hammer and piezoelectric acceler-ation sensor To reduce the measurement error rate we

adopted a sensor with a nonlinearity of less than 12 anda sensitivity of 10 mvg and placed the sensor in themiddle of the rotor shaft Table 6 compares the naturalfrequency experimental value with the simulated valuee experimental and simulated values of the first naturalfrequency were 1386Hz and 1453 Hz respectively esecond-order natural frequencies were 4100 Hz and

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

010203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash01

0001

0203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 18 Mode shapes at 97000 rpm (SLS 2) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

14 Shock and Vibration

4383 Hz respectively and the error rate was within 7But the higher mass of the accelerometer is the maincause of error value between the experimental value andthe simulated value

A more favorable verification was the oil film data shownin Figure 6e oil film data were experimental data providedby the turbocharger company In the simulation the oil filmwas the key factor in supporting or restraining the rotor isalso illustrates the reliability of the simulation method

times103

SWL (1X)

High temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 19 Effect of temperature on the Campbell diagram

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

High temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

Figure 20 Effect of temperature on stability diagram

5375Hz0036mm

8125Hz0147mm

Turbine side node 5X-direction

001

000500 1000

525Hz00037mm 7875Hz

0014mm

000

002

004

006

008

010

012

014

016

Am

plitu

de (m

m)

250 5000 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500Frequency (Hz)

Normal temperatureHigh temperature

Figure 21 Response comparison between case 1 and case 2 of theturbine side floating ring bearing center position (node 5)

Shock and Vibration 15

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 10: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

direction of the speed) which are marked as 1F and 2F inorder of increased frequency ere are also two backwardwhirls (the whirl direction of the rotor is opposite to therotation direction of the speed) that are marked as 3B and

4B respectively e synchronous whirl line is called thesynchronous excitation line In the figure the velocitiescorresponding to the intersection of the synchronouswhirl line and the frequency line of the forward whirl are

Temperature8177

Turbineside

Compressorside

(K)

7688

7199

6710

6222

5733

5244

4755

4266

3777

Figure 13 Postprocessing rotor temperature distribution

Figure 11 Global grid of rotor-shaft system

008

007

006

005

004

003

002

001

000

60000rpm

80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

12 13 14 15 16 17 18

ExperimentalCFD

(a)

014

012

010

008

006

004

002

000

60000rpm80000rpm

100000rpm

Pressure ratio

Mas

s flo

w ra

te (k

g sndash1

)

10 11 12 13 14 1615 17

ExperimentalCFD

(b)

Figure 12 Numerical simulation verified by experiments (a) Turbine side (b) Compressor side

10 Shock and Vibration

Compressorside

Turbineside035 10

TToT times103 (K)

Figure 14 Rotor temperature distribution of Bohn [19]

times103

SWL (1X)

Normal temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 15 Campbell diagram showing whirl frequency and rotor-spin speed for the first four modes

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

Normal temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 16 Stability diagram of rotor-shaft system without considering temperature

Shock and Vibration 11

marked as Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 respectively and were calculatedas follows Ωcr1 5 0115 rpm and Ωcr2 43 622 rpmBecause the backward whirl could not be excited by theunbalanced force it is not marked or considered

When the speed was in the critical speed range be-tween Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in the 1F mode the whirling fre-quency had a clear increasing trend at trend may havebeen caused by floating ring bearings because in thecritical speed range of Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 the stiffness anddamping of the oil film changed sharply When the criticalspeed of Ωcr2 was exceeded the stiffness and damping ofthe oil film changed smoothly and the eddy frequency inthe corresponding 1F mode also increased at a constantrate

Figure 16 shows that the curve of the damping ratio ofthe four modes in case 1 changed with the rotation speede modal damping ratio is the ratio of actual damping tothe critical damping of a certain mode and the dampingratio is the decisive parameter to describe the stability Apositive damping ratio means that the rotor-shaft systemwas in a stable region when the vibration energy wasdissipated A negative damping ratio means that therotation energy supported the rotor rotation by addingvibration energy resulting in the rotor-shaft systembecoming unstable e point where the damping ratiocurve intersects with the zero line is the stable limit speed(SLS) e figure shows that the rotor-shaft system be-came unstable when SLS 1 56 550 rpm in 1F mode andthen became unstable when SLS 2 97 946 rpm in 2Fmode

Figure 17 shows the four modes close to the SLS 1stability limit speed at 55000 rpm e black dotted linerepresents the axis the combination of the orange line andthe orange sphere represents the starting position of thetrajectory and the incomplete track curve represents thewhirl direction e figure shows that the 1F mode wascylindrical thus combining rigid body motion with rotorbending Furthermore the rotor was close to the unstablestate at this time In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode e figure shows that the 3B mode wasconical with both rigid body motion and rotor bendingLastly the 4B mode was cylindrical with both rigid bodymotion and rotor bending

Figure 18 shows the four modes close to the SLS 2stability limit speed at 97946 rpme rotor was close to theunstable state at this time e 1F and 3B modes were cy-lindrical and conical combining rigid body motion androtor bending In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode

322 Effect of Temperature on the Campbell Diagram andStability Diagram We exported the temperature data ofeach node in Figure 12 and inserted the temperature valueinto the corresponding rotor-shaft system node through the

Ansys software commands functionWe analysed the criticalspeed and stability of the rotor-shaft system in the thermalenvironment

Figure 19 shows that temperature affected the intrinsicfrequency (whirl frequency) Compared with case 1 thewhirl-frequency curves in the 1F 2F and 3B modes wereslightly lower whereas for the 4B mode the whirl-fre-quency curve was much lower In the figure the startingpoint at the left end (when the rotating speed was 0 rpm)was taken as the observation object In case 1 the frequencywas 23009 Hz whereas in case 2 the frequency decreasedto 21825 Hz Because the temperature changed the ma-terialrsquos elastic modulus and Poissonrsquos ratio it affected itsstructural stiffness For higher-order frequencies the effecton frequency became greater as the order increasedHowever the effect on the critical speed Ωcr1 did notchange much whereas Ωcr2 decreased from 43622 rpm to41815 rpm is decrease was also caused by the intrinsicfrequency drop

Figure 20 shows the stability diagram in case 2 and thatthe temperature had an important effect on the dampingratio and SLS Compared with case 1 SLS 1 of the 1F modedecreased from the original 56550 rpm to 55078 rpm andmade the 1F mode enter the unstable region ahead of timee 2F mode change was more obvious and the same SLS 2decreased from the original 97946 rpm to 95969 rpm ereason for this can be explained by the following formulaξr (α2ωhr) + (βωhr2) Here ξr is the damping ratiocoefficient of the rth mode α is the mass damping coeffi-cient β is the stiffness damping coefficient and ωhr is thenatural frequency of the rth mode In most cases α (α 0)can be disregarded that is ξr βωhr2 β did not changewhereas ωhr decreased because of the effect of temperatureresulting in a decrease in ξr In other words SLS 1 and SLS 2in the 1F and 2F modes were reduced erefore whenpredicting the stability limit reset and dynamic perfor-mance of a turbocharger rotor the effect of temperatureshould have a great influence on the dynamic design of therotor

323 Unbalance Response Analysis We applied a dummyunbalance mass of 001 kg middot mm at node 2 and the fre-quency range of the steady-state synchronous responseanalysis was 0 to 2500Hz (corresponding speed range0 to 150 000 rpm) We then measured the response am-plitude of the turbine end floating ring bearing centerposition node 5 In Figure 21 case 1 is represented by ablack curve (normal temperature) and case 2 by a redcurve (high temperature) In case 1 (case 2) the curvesrepresent 6F 6B and 20F modes e frequency at thewave crest corresponding to the frequency correspondingto the fast reverse rotation (the frequency of the rotationspeed within one minute) in the case 1 (case 2) Campbelldiagram as shown in Figures 22 and 23) is similar to the

12 Shock and Vibration

black (red) number in Figure 20 Because the steeringmode is dominant in the response diagram the criticalspeeds Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in case 1 (case 2) 1F and 2F modesare not shown in the diagram and followed a phenom-enon similar to that reported by Chouksey and Roy[29 30] Because of the effect of temperature the steering

frequency of case 2 shifted to the left making the changeof response amplitude more obvious e responsevalue at the peak of the 6F and 6B modes decreased from0147mm to 0014 mm and that at the peak of the20F and 20B modes decreased from 0036 mm to00037 mm

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02

ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 17 Mode shapes at 55000 rpm (SLS 1) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

Shock and Vibration 13

324 Verification of Rotor FEM Natural frequency anal-ysis is very important as the basis of a dynamic analysisWe obtained the first two natural frequencies of the rotorby hammering experiments and verified them by nu-merical simulation Figure 24 shows the measured parts(rotor system) force hammer and piezoelectric acceler-ation sensor To reduce the measurement error rate we

adopted a sensor with a nonlinearity of less than 12 anda sensitivity of 10 mvg and placed the sensor in themiddle of the rotor shaft Table 6 compares the naturalfrequency experimental value with the simulated valuee experimental and simulated values of the first naturalfrequency were 1386Hz and 1453 Hz respectively esecond-order natural frequencies were 4100 Hz and

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

010203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash01

0001

0203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 18 Mode shapes at 97000 rpm (SLS 2) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

14 Shock and Vibration

4383 Hz respectively and the error rate was within 7But the higher mass of the accelerometer is the maincause of error value between the experimental value andthe simulated value

A more favorable verification was the oil film data shownin Figure 6e oil film data were experimental data providedby the turbocharger company In the simulation the oil filmwas the key factor in supporting or restraining the rotor isalso illustrates the reliability of the simulation method

times103

SWL (1X)

High temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 19 Effect of temperature on the Campbell diagram

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

High temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

Figure 20 Effect of temperature on stability diagram

5375Hz0036mm

8125Hz0147mm

Turbine side node 5X-direction

001

000500 1000

525Hz00037mm 7875Hz

0014mm

000

002

004

006

008

010

012

014

016

Am

plitu

de (m

m)

250 5000 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500Frequency (Hz)

Normal temperatureHigh temperature

Figure 21 Response comparison between case 1 and case 2 of theturbine side floating ring bearing center position (node 5)

Shock and Vibration 15

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 11: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

Compressorside

Turbineside035 10

TToT times103 (K)

Figure 14 Rotor temperature distribution of Bohn [19]

times103

SWL (1X)

Normal temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 15 Campbell diagram showing whirl frequency and rotor-spin speed for the first four modes

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

Normal temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 16 Stability diagram of rotor-shaft system without considering temperature

Shock and Vibration 11

marked as Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 respectively and were calculatedas follows Ωcr1 5 0115 rpm and Ωcr2 43 622 rpmBecause the backward whirl could not be excited by theunbalanced force it is not marked or considered

When the speed was in the critical speed range be-tween Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in the 1F mode the whirling fre-quency had a clear increasing trend at trend may havebeen caused by floating ring bearings because in thecritical speed range of Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 the stiffness anddamping of the oil film changed sharply When the criticalspeed of Ωcr2 was exceeded the stiffness and damping ofthe oil film changed smoothly and the eddy frequency inthe corresponding 1F mode also increased at a constantrate

Figure 16 shows that the curve of the damping ratio ofthe four modes in case 1 changed with the rotation speede modal damping ratio is the ratio of actual damping tothe critical damping of a certain mode and the dampingratio is the decisive parameter to describe the stability Apositive damping ratio means that the rotor-shaft systemwas in a stable region when the vibration energy wasdissipated A negative damping ratio means that therotation energy supported the rotor rotation by addingvibration energy resulting in the rotor-shaft systembecoming unstable e point where the damping ratiocurve intersects with the zero line is the stable limit speed(SLS) e figure shows that the rotor-shaft system be-came unstable when SLS 1 56 550 rpm in 1F mode andthen became unstable when SLS 2 97 946 rpm in 2Fmode

Figure 17 shows the four modes close to the SLS 1stability limit speed at 55000 rpm e black dotted linerepresents the axis the combination of the orange line andthe orange sphere represents the starting position of thetrajectory and the incomplete track curve represents thewhirl direction e figure shows that the 1F mode wascylindrical thus combining rigid body motion with rotorbending Furthermore the rotor was close to the unstablestate at this time In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode e figure shows that the 3B mode wasconical with both rigid body motion and rotor bendingLastly the 4B mode was cylindrical with both rigid bodymotion and rotor bending

Figure 18 shows the four modes close to the SLS 2stability limit speed at 97946 rpme rotor was close to theunstable state at this time e 1F and 3B modes were cy-lindrical and conical combining rigid body motion androtor bending In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode

322 Effect of Temperature on the Campbell Diagram andStability Diagram We exported the temperature data ofeach node in Figure 12 and inserted the temperature valueinto the corresponding rotor-shaft system node through the

Ansys software commands functionWe analysed the criticalspeed and stability of the rotor-shaft system in the thermalenvironment

Figure 19 shows that temperature affected the intrinsicfrequency (whirl frequency) Compared with case 1 thewhirl-frequency curves in the 1F 2F and 3B modes wereslightly lower whereas for the 4B mode the whirl-fre-quency curve was much lower In the figure the startingpoint at the left end (when the rotating speed was 0 rpm)was taken as the observation object In case 1 the frequencywas 23009 Hz whereas in case 2 the frequency decreasedto 21825 Hz Because the temperature changed the ma-terialrsquos elastic modulus and Poissonrsquos ratio it affected itsstructural stiffness For higher-order frequencies the effecton frequency became greater as the order increasedHowever the effect on the critical speed Ωcr1 did notchange much whereas Ωcr2 decreased from 43622 rpm to41815 rpm is decrease was also caused by the intrinsicfrequency drop

Figure 20 shows the stability diagram in case 2 and thatthe temperature had an important effect on the dampingratio and SLS Compared with case 1 SLS 1 of the 1F modedecreased from the original 56550 rpm to 55078 rpm andmade the 1F mode enter the unstable region ahead of timee 2F mode change was more obvious and the same SLS 2decreased from the original 97946 rpm to 95969 rpm ereason for this can be explained by the following formulaξr (α2ωhr) + (βωhr2) Here ξr is the damping ratiocoefficient of the rth mode α is the mass damping coeffi-cient β is the stiffness damping coefficient and ωhr is thenatural frequency of the rth mode In most cases α (α 0)can be disregarded that is ξr βωhr2 β did not changewhereas ωhr decreased because of the effect of temperatureresulting in a decrease in ξr In other words SLS 1 and SLS 2in the 1F and 2F modes were reduced erefore whenpredicting the stability limit reset and dynamic perfor-mance of a turbocharger rotor the effect of temperatureshould have a great influence on the dynamic design of therotor

323 Unbalance Response Analysis We applied a dummyunbalance mass of 001 kg middot mm at node 2 and the fre-quency range of the steady-state synchronous responseanalysis was 0 to 2500Hz (corresponding speed range0 to 150 000 rpm) We then measured the response am-plitude of the turbine end floating ring bearing centerposition node 5 In Figure 21 case 1 is represented by ablack curve (normal temperature) and case 2 by a redcurve (high temperature) In case 1 (case 2) the curvesrepresent 6F 6B and 20F modes e frequency at thewave crest corresponding to the frequency correspondingto the fast reverse rotation (the frequency of the rotationspeed within one minute) in the case 1 (case 2) Campbelldiagram as shown in Figures 22 and 23) is similar to the

12 Shock and Vibration

black (red) number in Figure 20 Because the steeringmode is dominant in the response diagram the criticalspeeds Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in case 1 (case 2) 1F and 2F modesare not shown in the diagram and followed a phenom-enon similar to that reported by Chouksey and Roy[29 30] Because of the effect of temperature the steering

frequency of case 2 shifted to the left making the changeof response amplitude more obvious e responsevalue at the peak of the 6F and 6B modes decreased from0147mm to 0014 mm and that at the peak of the20F and 20B modes decreased from 0036 mm to00037 mm

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02

ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 17 Mode shapes at 55000 rpm (SLS 1) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

Shock and Vibration 13

324 Verification of Rotor FEM Natural frequency anal-ysis is very important as the basis of a dynamic analysisWe obtained the first two natural frequencies of the rotorby hammering experiments and verified them by nu-merical simulation Figure 24 shows the measured parts(rotor system) force hammer and piezoelectric acceler-ation sensor To reduce the measurement error rate we

adopted a sensor with a nonlinearity of less than 12 anda sensitivity of 10 mvg and placed the sensor in themiddle of the rotor shaft Table 6 compares the naturalfrequency experimental value with the simulated valuee experimental and simulated values of the first naturalfrequency were 1386Hz and 1453 Hz respectively esecond-order natural frequencies were 4100 Hz and

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

010203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash01

0001

0203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 18 Mode shapes at 97000 rpm (SLS 2) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

14 Shock and Vibration

4383 Hz respectively and the error rate was within 7But the higher mass of the accelerometer is the maincause of error value between the experimental value andthe simulated value

A more favorable verification was the oil film data shownin Figure 6e oil film data were experimental data providedby the turbocharger company In the simulation the oil filmwas the key factor in supporting or restraining the rotor isalso illustrates the reliability of the simulation method

times103

SWL (1X)

High temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 19 Effect of temperature on the Campbell diagram

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

High temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

Figure 20 Effect of temperature on stability diagram

5375Hz0036mm

8125Hz0147mm

Turbine side node 5X-direction

001

000500 1000

525Hz00037mm 7875Hz

0014mm

000

002

004

006

008

010

012

014

016

Am

plitu

de (m

m)

250 5000 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500Frequency (Hz)

Normal temperatureHigh temperature

Figure 21 Response comparison between case 1 and case 2 of theturbine side floating ring bearing center position (node 5)

Shock and Vibration 15

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 12: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

marked as Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 respectively and were calculatedas follows Ωcr1 5 0115 rpm and Ωcr2 43 622 rpmBecause the backward whirl could not be excited by theunbalanced force it is not marked or considered

When the speed was in the critical speed range be-tween Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in the 1F mode the whirling fre-quency had a clear increasing trend at trend may havebeen caused by floating ring bearings because in thecritical speed range of Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 the stiffness anddamping of the oil film changed sharply When the criticalspeed of Ωcr2 was exceeded the stiffness and damping ofthe oil film changed smoothly and the eddy frequency inthe corresponding 1F mode also increased at a constantrate

Figure 16 shows that the curve of the damping ratio ofthe four modes in case 1 changed with the rotation speede modal damping ratio is the ratio of actual damping tothe critical damping of a certain mode and the dampingratio is the decisive parameter to describe the stability Apositive damping ratio means that the rotor-shaft systemwas in a stable region when the vibration energy wasdissipated A negative damping ratio means that therotation energy supported the rotor rotation by addingvibration energy resulting in the rotor-shaft systembecoming unstable e point where the damping ratiocurve intersects with the zero line is the stable limit speed(SLS) e figure shows that the rotor-shaft system be-came unstable when SLS 1 56 550 rpm in 1F mode andthen became unstable when SLS 2 97 946 rpm in 2Fmode

Figure 17 shows the four modes close to the SLS 1stability limit speed at 55000 rpm e black dotted linerepresents the axis the combination of the orange line andthe orange sphere represents the starting position of thetrajectory and the incomplete track curve represents thewhirl direction e figure shows that the 1F mode wascylindrical thus combining rigid body motion with rotorbending Furthermore the rotor was close to the unstablestate at this time In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode e figure shows that the 3B mode wasconical with both rigid body motion and rotor bendingLastly the 4B mode was cylindrical with both rigid bodymotion and rotor bending

Figure 18 shows the four modes close to the SLS 2stability limit speed at 97946 rpme rotor was close to theunstable state at this time e 1F and 3B modes were cy-lindrical and conical combining rigid body motion androtor bending In contrast the 2F mode was a conicalbending mode

322 Effect of Temperature on the Campbell Diagram andStability Diagram We exported the temperature data ofeach node in Figure 12 and inserted the temperature valueinto the corresponding rotor-shaft system node through the

Ansys software commands functionWe analysed the criticalspeed and stability of the rotor-shaft system in the thermalenvironment

Figure 19 shows that temperature affected the intrinsicfrequency (whirl frequency) Compared with case 1 thewhirl-frequency curves in the 1F 2F and 3B modes wereslightly lower whereas for the 4B mode the whirl-fre-quency curve was much lower In the figure the startingpoint at the left end (when the rotating speed was 0 rpm)was taken as the observation object In case 1 the frequencywas 23009 Hz whereas in case 2 the frequency decreasedto 21825 Hz Because the temperature changed the ma-terialrsquos elastic modulus and Poissonrsquos ratio it affected itsstructural stiffness For higher-order frequencies the effecton frequency became greater as the order increasedHowever the effect on the critical speed Ωcr1 did notchange much whereas Ωcr2 decreased from 43622 rpm to41815 rpm is decrease was also caused by the intrinsicfrequency drop

Figure 20 shows the stability diagram in case 2 and thatthe temperature had an important effect on the dampingratio and SLS Compared with case 1 SLS 1 of the 1F modedecreased from the original 56550 rpm to 55078 rpm andmade the 1F mode enter the unstable region ahead of timee 2F mode change was more obvious and the same SLS 2decreased from the original 97946 rpm to 95969 rpm ereason for this can be explained by the following formulaξr (α2ωhr) + (βωhr2) Here ξr is the damping ratiocoefficient of the rth mode α is the mass damping coeffi-cient β is the stiffness damping coefficient and ωhr is thenatural frequency of the rth mode In most cases α (α 0)can be disregarded that is ξr βωhr2 β did not changewhereas ωhr decreased because of the effect of temperatureresulting in a decrease in ξr In other words SLS 1 and SLS 2in the 1F and 2F modes were reduced erefore whenpredicting the stability limit reset and dynamic perfor-mance of a turbocharger rotor the effect of temperatureshould have a great influence on the dynamic design of therotor

323 Unbalance Response Analysis We applied a dummyunbalance mass of 001 kg middot mm at node 2 and the fre-quency range of the steady-state synchronous responseanalysis was 0 to 2500Hz (corresponding speed range0 to 150 000 rpm) We then measured the response am-plitude of the turbine end floating ring bearing centerposition node 5 In Figure 21 case 1 is represented by ablack curve (normal temperature) and case 2 by a redcurve (high temperature) In case 1 (case 2) the curvesrepresent 6F 6B and 20F modes e frequency at thewave crest corresponding to the frequency correspondingto the fast reverse rotation (the frequency of the rotationspeed within one minute) in the case 1 (case 2) Campbelldiagram as shown in Figures 22 and 23) is similar to the

12 Shock and Vibration

black (red) number in Figure 20 Because the steeringmode is dominant in the response diagram the criticalspeeds Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in case 1 (case 2) 1F and 2F modesare not shown in the diagram and followed a phenom-enon similar to that reported by Chouksey and Roy[29 30] Because of the effect of temperature the steering

frequency of case 2 shifted to the left making the changeof response amplitude more obvious e responsevalue at the peak of the 6F and 6B modes decreased from0147mm to 0014 mm and that at the peak of the20F and 20B modes decreased from 0036 mm to00037 mm

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02

ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 17 Mode shapes at 55000 rpm (SLS 1) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

Shock and Vibration 13

324 Verification of Rotor FEM Natural frequency anal-ysis is very important as the basis of a dynamic analysisWe obtained the first two natural frequencies of the rotorby hammering experiments and verified them by nu-merical simulation Figure 24 shows the measured parts(rotor system) force hammer and piezoelectric acceler-ation sensor To reduce the measurement error rate we

adopted a sensor with a nonlinearity of less than 12 anda sensitivity of 10 mvg and placed the sensor in themiddle of the rotor shaft Table 6 compares the naturalfrequency experimental value with the simulated valuee experimental and simulated values of the first naturalfrequency were 1386Hz and 1453 Hz respectively esecond-order natural frequencies were 4100 Hz and

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

010203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash01

0001

0203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 18 Mode shapes at 97000 rpm (SLS 2) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

14 Shock and Vibration

4383 Hz respectively and the error rate was within 7But the higher mass of the accelerometer is the maincause of error value between the experimental value andthe simulated value

A more favorable verification was the oil film data shownin Figure 6e oil film data were experimental data providedby the turbocharger company In the simulation the oil filmwas the key factor in supporting or restraining the rotor isalso illustrates the reliability of the simulation method

times103

SWL (1X)

High temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 19 Effect of temperature on the Campbell diagram

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

High temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

Figure 20 Effect of temperature on stability diagram

5375Hz0036mm

8125Hz0147mm

Turbine side node 5X-direction

001

000500 1000

525Hz00037mm 7875Hz

0014mm

000

002

004

006

008

010

012

014

016

Am

plitu

de (m

m)

250 5000 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500Frequency (Hz)

Normal temperatureHigh temperature

Figure 21 Response comparison between case 1 and case 2 of theturbine side floating ring bearing center position (node 5)

Shock and Vibration 15

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 13: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

black (red) number in Figure 20 Because the steeringmode is dominant in the response diagram the criticalspeeds Ωcr1 and Ωcr2 in case 1 (case 2) 1F and 2F modesare not shown in the diagram and followed a phenom-enon similar to that reported by Chouksey and Roy[29 30] Because of the effect of temperature the steering

frequency of case 2 shifted to the left making the changeof response amplitude more obvious e responsevalue at the peak of the 6F and 6B modes decreased from0147mm to 0014 mm and that at the peak of the20F and 20B modes decreased from 0036 mm to00037 mm

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02

ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash01000102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 55000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 17 Mode shapes at 55000 rpm (SLS 1) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

Shock and Vibration 13

324 Verification of Rotor FEM Natural frequency anal-ysis is very important as the basis of a dynamic analysisWe obtained the first two natural frequencies of the rotorby hammering experiments and verified them by nu-merical simulation Figure 24 shows the measured parts(rotor system) force hammer and piezoelectric acceler-ation sensor To reduce the measurement error rate we

adopted a sensor with a nonlinearity of less than 12 anda sensitivity of 10 mvg and placed the sensor in themiddle of the rotor shaft Table 6 compares the naturalfrequency experimental value with the simulated valuee experimental and simulated values of the first naturalfrequency were 1386Hz and 1453 Hz respectively esecond-order natural frequencies were 4100 Hz and

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

010203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash01

0001

0203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 18 Mode shapes at 97000 rpm (SLS 2) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

14 Shock and Vibration

4383 Hz respectively and the error rate was within 7But the higher mass of the accelerometer is the maincause of error value between the experimental value andthe simulated value

A more favorable verification was the oil film data shownin Figure 6e oil film data were experimental data providedby the turbocharger company In the simulation the oil filmwas the key factor in supporting or restraining the rotor isalso illustrates the reliability of the simulation method

times103

SWL (1X)

High temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 19 Effect of temperature on the Campbell diagram

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

High temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

Figure 20 Effect of temperature on stability diagram

5375Hz0036mm

8125Hz0147mm

Turbine side node 5X-direction

001

000500 1000

525Hz00037mm 7875Hz

0014mm

000

002

004

006

008

010

012

014

016

Am

plitu

de (m

m)

250 5000 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500Frequency (Hz)

Normal temperatureHigh temperature

Figure 21 Response comparison between case 1 and case 2 of theturbine side floating ring bearing center position (node 5)

Shock and Vibration 15

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 14: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

324 Verification of Rotor FEM Natural frequency anal-ysis is very important as the basis of a dynamic analysisWe obtained the first two natural frequencies of the rotorby hammering experiments and verified them by nu-merical simulation Figure 24 shows the measured parts(rotor system) force hammer and piezoelectric acceler-ation sensor To reduce the measurement error rate we

adopted a sensor with a nonlinearity of less than 12 anda sensitivity of 10 mvg and placed the sensor in themiddle of the rotor shaft Table 6 compares the naturalfrequency experimental value with the simulated valuee experimental and simulated values of the first naturalfrequency were 1386Hz and 1453 Hz respectively esecond-order natural frequencies were 4100 Hz and

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

1F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(a)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash0100

010203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

2F (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(b)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04ndash04

ndash03ndash02ndash0100

0102

0304 0

2550

75100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

3B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(c)

04030201

Y-di

r

X-dir

00ndash01ndash02ndash03ndash04

ndash04ndash03ndash02ndash01

0001

0203

04 025

5075

100

Z-dir (shaft axis)

125150

4B (Ω = 97000rpm)Shaft axisStarting line

(d)

Figure 18 Mode shapes at 97000 rpm (SLS 2) (a) Mode 1F (b) Mode 2F (c) Mode 3B (d) Mode 4B

14 Shock and Vibration

4383 Hz respectively and the error rate was within 7But the higher mass of the accelerometer is the maincause of error value between the experimental value andthe simulated value

A more favorable verification was the oil film data shownin Figure 6e oil film data were experimental data providedby the turbocharger company In the simulation the oil filmwas the key factor in supporting or restraining the rotor isalso illustrates the reliability of the simulation method

times103

SWL (1X)

High temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 19 Effect of temperature on the Campbell diagram

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

High temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

Figure 20 Effect of temperature on stability diagram

5375Hz0036mm

8125Hz0147mm

Turbine side node 5X-direction

001

000500 1000

525Hz00037mm 7875Hz

0014mm

000

002

004

006

008

010

012

014

016

Am

plitu

de (m

m)

250 5000 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500Frequency (Hz)

Normal temperatureHigh temperature

Figure 21 Response comparison between case 1 and case 2 of theturbine side floating ring bearing center position (node 5)

Shock and Vibration 15

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 15: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

4383 Hz respectively and the error rate was within 7But the higher mass of the accelerometer is the maincause of error value between the experimental value andthe simulated value

A more favorable verification was the oil film data shownin Figure 6e oil film data were experimental data providedby the turbocharger company In the simulation the oil filmwas the key factor in supporting or restraining the rotor isalso illustrates the reliability of the simulation method

times103

SWL (1X)

High temperature

1F2F

3B4B

Ωcr2Ωcr1

0

550

1100

1650

2200

2750

3300

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 19 Effect of temperature on the Campbell diagram

times103

SLS 1 SLS 2

High temperature

Zero line1F2F

3B4B

20 40 60 80 100 120 140 1600Rotor spin speed (rpm)

ndash04

ndash02

00

02

04

06

08

10

Mod

al d

ampl

ing

Figure 20 Effect of temperature on stability diagram

5375Hz0036mm

8125Hz0147mm

Turbine side node 5X-direction

001

000500 1000

525Hz00037mm 7875Hz

0014mm

000

002

004

006

008

010

012

014

016

Am

plitu

de (m

m)

250 5000 750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 2250 2500Frequency (Hz)

Normal temperatureHigh temperature

Figure 21 Response comparison between case 1 and case 2 of theturbine side floating ring bearing center position (node 5)

Shock and Vibration 15

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 16: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

SWL (1X)

1F

20F

2F

19F6F

12F

3B20B

6B

32250rpm (5375Hz)

48750rpm (8125Hz)

1F2F3B

6B20F

6F12F

19F20B

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

14000

14250

14500

14750

15000

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 22 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 1)

SWL (1X)

1F

2F

3B

19F

6F

12F

20F

20B6B

47250rpm (7875Hz)

31500rpm (525Hz)

ndash150

0

150

300

450

600

750

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

13500

13750

14000

14250

14500

Freq

uenc

y (H

z)

1F2F3B

6B20B

6F12F

19F20B

25000 30000 35000 40000 45000 5000020000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

20000 30000 40000 50000 6000010000Rotor spin speed (rpm)

Figure 23 Partial enlargement of Campbell diagram (case 2)

Figure 24 Hammering experiment for a rotor

16 Shock and Vibration

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 17: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

4 Conclusions

is study used the CHT numerical simulation method toobtain the temperature of a rotor-shaft system and foundthat there was a large temperature gradient when the systemwas in use

Splitting the rotation shaft solved the problem that asolid model cannot obtain an axis orbit on the AnsysWorkbench software platform

Analysing the Campbell diagram shows that the tem-perature reduced the stiffness of the rotor structure causingthe intrinsic frequency to decrease especially for higher-order frequencies e decrease in stiffness was greater andthe critical speed (Ωcr1) in the 1F mode did not changemuch whereas the critical speed (Ωcr2) in the 2F modedecreased a large amount erefore dynamic design andstability prediction of a turbocharger rotor must considerthe temperature during its operation

For the analysis of an unbalanced response the responsecorresponding to the critical speed in the 1F and 2F modesdoes not appear in Figure 21 because these two modes havehigher damping and because the two steering modes weredominant However the response diagram can well reflectthe rotor steering mode Also the temperature effect on theresponse was mainly reflected in the response amplitudeand the response frequency was slightly shifted to the left(reduced) which was similar to the decreased intrinsicfrequency relation

Abbreviations

CHT Conjugate heat transferSWL Synchronous whirl lineSLS Stable limit speedTC Turbochargerr-F r-th forward whirl moder-B r-th backward whirl modeGreek Symbolsα Mass damping coefficientβ Stiffness damping coefficiente Natural baseσ Stressξr Damping ratio coefficienty+ Dimensionless wall thicknessSubscriptsbrg Bearingcr Criticalcon Constante ElementE Energyf Fluidh Harmonics Solid

sh Shafttrs Translationrot Rotationtem Temperaturetot Total

Data Availability

e data used to support the findings of this study areavailable from the corresponding author upon request

Conflicts of Interest

e authors declare that there are no conflicts of interestregarding the publication of this paper

Acknowledgments

is work was supported by the Key Research amp Devel-opmental Program of Shandong Province (Grant no2019GGX104104) e authors are grateful for technicalsupport and the experimental data from Kangyue Tech-nology Co Ltd

References

[1] Z Yang and A Bandivadekar Light-Duty Vehicle GreenhouseGas and Fuel Economy Standards ICCT Washington DCUSA 2017

[2] S B Arab J D Rodrigues S Bouaziz and M HaddarldquoStability analysis of internally damped rotating compositeshafts using a finite element formulationrdquo Comptes RendusMecanique vol 346 no 4 pp 291ndash307 2018

[3] H Zinberg and M F Symonds ldquoe development of anadvanced composite tail rotor driveshaftrdquo in Proceedings ofthe 26th Annual National Forum of the American HelicopterSociety pp 55ndash63 1970

[4] D G Lee H Sung Kim J Kook Kim and J K Kim ldquoDesignand manufacture of an automotive hybrid aluminumcom-posite drive shaftrdquo Composite Structures vol 63 no 1pp 87ndash99 Washington DC USA 2004

[5] R Sino T N Baranger E Chatelet and G Jacquet ldquoDynamicanalysis of a rotating composite shaftrdquoComposites Science andTechnology vol 68 no 2 pp 337ndash345 2008

[6] H L Wettergren and K-O Olsson ldquoDynamic instability of arotating asymmetric shaft with internal viscous dampingsupported in anisotropic bearingsrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 195 no 1 pp 75ndash84 1996

[7] O Montagnier and C Hochard ldquoDynamic instability ofsupercritical driveshafts mounted on dissipative supports-effects of viscous and hysteretic internal dampingrdquo Journal ofSound and Vibration vol 305 no 3 pp 378ndash400 2007

[8] F Vatta and A Vigliani ldquoInternal damping in rotating shaftsrdquoMechanism and Machine Deory vol 43 no 11 pp 1376ndash1384 2008

[9] B L Newkirk ldquoShaft whippingrdquo Genernal Electric Reviewvol 27 pp 169ndash178 1924

[10] G Genta ldquoOn a persistent misunderstanding of the role ofhysteretic damping in rotordynamicsrdquo Journal of Vibrationand Acoustics vol 126 no 3 pp 459ndash461 2004

[11] L S Andres J C Rivadeneira K Gjika C Groves andG LaRue ldquoA virtual tool for prediction of turbochargernonlinear dynamic response validation against test datardquo

Table 6 Experimental and calculated values of natural frequencies

Order number Experimental value Simulated value Error rate1 1386Hz 1453Hz 00462 4100Hz 4383Hz 0064

Shock and Vibration 17

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration

Page 18: Dynamic Behaviour Analysis of Turbocharger Rotor-Shaft ...

Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 129no 4 pp 1035ndash1046 2007

[12] P Zych and G Zywica ldquoOptimisation of stress distribution ina highly loaded radial-axial gas microturbine using FEMrdquo DeGruyter vol 10 pp 318ndash335 2020

[13] P Jeyaraj N Ganesan and C Padmanabhan ldquoVibration andacoustic response of a composite plate with inherent materialdamping in a thermal environmentrdquo Journal of Sound andVibration vol 320 no 1-2 pp 322ndash338 2009

[14] Y Guo L Li and D Zhang ldquoDynamic modeling and vi-bration analysis of rotating beams with active constrainedlayer damping treatment in temperature fieldrdquo CompositeStructures vol 226 Article ID 111217 2019

[15] R D Burke ldquoAnalysis and modeling of the transient thermalbehavior of automotive turbochargersrdquo Journal of Engineeringfor Gas Turbines and Power vol 136 pp 1ndash10 Article ID10511 2014

[16] A Romagnoli A Manivannan S Rajoo et al ldquoA review ofheat transfer in turbochargersrdquo Renewable and SustainableEnergy Reviews vol 79 pp 1442ndash1460 2017

[17] G Tanda S Marelli G Marmorato and M Capobianco ldquoAnexperimental investigation of internal heat transfer in anautomotive turbocharger compressorrdquo Applied Energyvol 193 pp 531ndash539 2017

[18] M P Bulat and P V Bulat ldquoComparison of turbulencemodels in the calculation of supersonic separated flowsrdquoWorld Applied Sciences Journal vol 27 no 10 pp 1263ndash12662013

[19] D Bohn T Heuer and K Kusterer ldquoConjugate flow and heattransfer investigation of a turbo chargerrdquo Journal of Engi-neering for Gas Turbines and Power vol 127 no 3pp 663ndash669 2005

[20] L Gang K Karsten H A Anis B Dieter and S TakaoldquoConjugate heat transfer analysis of convection-cooled tur-bine vanes using c-Reθ transition modelrdquo InternationalJournal of Gas Turbine Propulsion and Power Systems vol 6no 3 pp 9ndash15 2014

[21] R D Burke C R M Vagg D Chalet and P Chesse ldquoHeattransfer in turbocharger turbines under steady pulsating andtransient conditionsrdquo International Journal of Heat and FluidFlow vol 52 pp 185ndash197 2015

[22] H Chung H-S Sohn J S Park K M Kim and H H Choldquoermo-structural analysis of cracks on gas turbine vanesegment having multiple airfoilsrdquo Energy vol 118pp 1275ndash1285 2017

[23] D Bohn B Bonhoff H Schonenborn and H WilhelmiPrediction of the Film-Cooling Effectiveness in Gas TurbineBlades using a Numerical Model for the Coupled Simulation ofFluid Flow and Diabatic Walls Publikationsserver der RWTHAachen University Aachen Germany 1995

[24] S M Moosania and X Zheng ldquoEffect of internal heat leakageon the performance of a high pressure ratio centrifugalcompressorrdquo Applied Dermal Engineering vol 111pp 317ndash324 2017

[25] China Aeronautical Materials Handbook Editorial Commit-tee China Aeronautical Materials Handbook China Stan-dards Press Beijing China 2002

[26] Z Wang Structural Reliability of Vehicle Turbocharger Sci-ence Press Beijing China 2013

[27] L Tian W J Wang and Z J Peng ldquoDynamic behaviours of afull floating ring bearing supported turbocharger rotor withengine excitationrdquo Journal of Sound and Vibration vol 330no 20 pp 4857ndash4874 2011

[28] A A Alsaeed and D J Inman Dynamic Stability Evaluationof an Automotive Turbocharger Rotor-Bearing System Vir-ginia Polytechnic Institute and State University BlacksburgVA USA 2005

[29] M Chouksey J K Dutt and S V Modak ldquoModal analysis ofrotor-shaft system under the influence of rotor-shaft materialdamping and fluid film forcesrdquo Mechanism and MachineDeory vol 48 pp 81ndash93 2012

[30] H Roy and S Chandraker ldquoDynamic study of viscoelasticrotor modal analysis of higher order model consideringvarious asymmetriesrdquo Mechanism and Machine Deoryvol 109 pp 65ndash77 2017

18 Shock and Vibration


Recommended