Dynamic Traffic Dynamic Traffic Assignment and Assignment and Applications in the Twin Applications in the Twin Cities AreaCities Area
Steve WilsonSteve Wilson SRF Consulting GroupSRF Consulting Group
Duluth, MinnesotaDuluth, Minnesota
August, 2008August, 2008
OutlineOutline
Background/FHWA SupportBackground/FHWA Support 35W Bridge Project35W Bridge Project Test ApplicationsTest Applications FHWA DTA Ongoing DevelopmentFHWA DTA Ongoing Development
What is Dynamic What is Dynamic Traffic Assignment Traffic Assignment (DTA)?(DTA)? Mesoscopic traffic assignment Mesoscopic traffic assignment
modelmodel– More responsive to operational More responsive to operational
factors (queuing) than traditional factors (queuing) than traditional travel demand modelstravel demand models
– More responsive to system level More responsive to system level factors (route-changing) than factors (route-changing) than traditional operations modelstraditional operations models
Travel Demand Model Travel Demand Model Assignment Assignment LimitationsLimitations Trips are instantaneously on all Trips are instantaneously on all
links between origin to links between origin to destination (not time-dependent)destination (not time-dependent)
Congestion delay does not Congestion delay does not adequately reflect bottlenecks adequately reflect bottlenecks (upstream or downstream) (upstream or downstream)
DTA Models DTA Models AvailabilityAvailability Federal Highways DTAFederal Highways DTA Commercial VendorsCommercial Vendors
– CITILABSCITILABS– TRANSCADTRANSCAD– PTV PTV – EMME/2 EMME/2 – OthersOthers
FHWA DTA (TrEPS) FHWA DTA (TrEPS) ProgramProgram
Started in 1995Started in 1995 Two parallel tracks (Real-time ITS and Two parallel tracks (Real-time ITS and
Operational Planning) Operational Planning) Linking planning and operationsLinking planning and operations
– Concept of “Concept of “Operational PlanningOperational Planning”” Fill in the traffic analysis tool gapFill in the traffic analysis tool gap
– Macroscopic (static, regional) Macroscopic (static, regional) – Mesoscopic (dynamic, regional) Mesoscopic (dynamic, regional) – Microscopic (dynamic, corridor)Microscopic (dynamic, corridor)
Integration with TDM and microscopic Integration with TDM and microscopic model model
Program ActivitiesProgram Activities
DTA concept education and outreachDTA concept education and outreach
– Webinars (online) – several per yearWebinars (online) – several per year
– Short seminar (0.5-1 day) – on demandShort seminar (0.5-1 day) – on demand
– Workshops (2.5 day) – 2 to 3 per yearWorkshops (2.5 day) – 2 to 3 per yearMn/DOT (September 2008)Mn/DOT (September 2008)
Program ActivitiesProgram Activities
Technical support to state agenciesTechnical support to state agencies– MPO/DOT – FHWA division – Resource MPO/DOT – FHWA division – Resource
center – FHWA HQ or TFHRCcenter – FHWA HQ or TFHRC– Educational SupportEducational Support
Training for DTA conceptsTraining for DTA concepts
– Modeling SupportModeling Support Assist in initial modeling and dataset Assist in initial modeling and dataset
buildupbuildup Can be extended to consultants for a Can be extended to consultants for a
federally funded projectfederally funded project Matching-fund may be needed if more Matching-fund may be needed if more
involvement is requestedinvolvement is requested
M&O StatusM&O Status (updated May 2008) (updated May 2008)
State Users
Workshops held
Future Workshops(TBD)
Initial Development of Initial Development of Twin Cities FHWA DTA Twin Cities FHWA DTA ModelModel
I-35W Bridge I-35W Bridge CollapseCollapse
FHWA ResponseFHWA Response Pace of StudyPace of Study
MnDOT Model MnDOT Model DevelopmentDevelopment Importing of regional TDF model Importing of regional TDF model
networknetwork Importing of regional TDF model Importing of regional TDF model
trip tablestrip tables Network cleaningNetwork cleaning Simplified traffic control Simplified traffic control
assumptionsassumptions
MnDOT Model MnDOT Model DevelopmentDevelopment Calibration/adjustment of O-D Calibration/adjustment of O-D
matricesmatrices Testing of routing/improvement Testing of routing/improvement
scenariosscenarios
Initial Development of Initial Development of Twin Cities FHWA DTA Twin Cities FHWA DTA ModelModel
I-35W Bridge I-35W Bridge CollapseCollapse
FHWA ResponseFHWA Response Pace of StudyPace of Study
I-35W UPA ProjectI-35W UPA Project
UPA Program UPA Program CompetitionCompetition
Innovative, multi-Innovative, multi-modal, pricedmodal, priced
Open by end of Open by end of 20092009
I-35W UPA ProjectI-35W UPA Project
Priced dynamic shoulder lane segment
Addition of a HOT lane in Crosstown reconstruction project
Conversion of existing HOV lane to HOT lane
Also: BRT advanced implementation, park-ride, ITS
Why Dynamic Traffic Why Dynamic Traffic Assignment?Assignment? AvailabilityAvailability Better MOEs for comparison of Better MOEs for comparison of
AlternativesAlternatives High-level operational evaluationHigh-level operational evaluation HOT lane capabilitiesHOT lane capabilities
Why Why NotNot Dynamic Dynamic Traffic Assignment?Traffic Assignment? Availability/readinessAvailability/readiness
Memory/CPU resourcesMemory/CPU resources
Learning curveLearning curve
Traffic engineers’ comfort zoneTraffic engineers’ comfort zone
AnalysisAnalysis(Top 20 O-D pairs impacted by (Top 20 O-D pairs impacted by bridge collapse)bridge collapse)
341
424
444
339
426
340
443
336
423
318
124
337
119
321
414
514
123
371
359
372
420
421
335
334
322
373337
Twin Cities FHWA DTA Twin Cities FHWA DTA ModelModel
Travel time into Travel time into Downtown areaDowntown area
409
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
30
50
70
90
11
0
13
0
15
0
17
0
19
0
21
0
23
0
Departure Time(min)
Tra
ve
l T
ime
(m
in)
w
wo
410
0102030405060708090
10
30
50
70
90
11
0
13
0
15
0
17
0
19
0
21
0
23
0
Departure Time (min)
Tra
ve
l T
ime
(m
in)
w
wo
408
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
30
50
70
90
11
0
13
0
15
0
17
0
19
0
21
0
23
0
Departure Time (min)
Tra
ve
l T
ime
(m
in)
w
wo
407
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
10
30
50
70
90
11
0
13
0
15
0
17
0
19
0
21
0
23
0
To
tal
Departure Time (min)
Tra
ve
l Tim
e (
min
)
w
wo
FHWA DTA Model FHWA DTA Model (Subarea)(Subarea)
Learning CurveLearning Curve
““CORSIM-like”CORSIM-like”
Wiki help systemWiki help system
Model Integration w/ TDF Model Integration w/ TDF softwaressoftwares
FHWA DTA HOT Lane FHWA DTA HOT Lane OptionsOptions Distance-basedDistance-based
Link-basedLink-based
Zone-based (coming soon)Zone-based (coming soon)
FHWA DTA HOT Lane FHWA DTA HOT Lane Options FlexibilityOptions Flexibility
Multiple User Class Multiple User Class FlexibilityFlexibility
Flexible Traffic Flow Flexible Traffic Flow ModelModel
Exportable Tabular Exportable Tabular OutputOutput
Graphic OutputGraphic Output
Time Stream Time Stream ComparisonsComparisons
FHWA DTA TestsFHWA DTA Tests(with subarea model)(with subarea model)
Sensitivity to geometric changesSensitivity to geometric changes– Through lane addThrough lane add– Auxiliary lane addAuxiliary lane add– Bottleneck queuingBottleneck queuing
Stadium event departureStadium event departure Peak-segment ramp O-D volumesPeak-segment ramp O-D volumes
Best Candidate DTA Best Candidate DTA UsesUses Evacuation Planning Work zones Systems Planning Value pricing/HOT Lanes Benefit-Cost Analysis Travel demand model feedback
Lessons LearnedLessons Learned
New DTA model not short-term New DTA model not short-term responseresponse
Integration with planning/simulation Integration with planning/simulation modelsmodels
Role of DTA in project development Role of DTA in project development processprocess
FHWA DTA V2.0 FHWA DTA V2.0 Modeling FeaturesModeling Features Lane-group based Anisotropic Mesoscopic Lane-group based Anisotropic Mesoscopic
Simulation (AMS) models Simulation (AMS) models Relative gap gradient based assignment Relative gap gradient based assignment
algorithmalgorithm Epoch implementation for 24-hour to multi-Epoch implementation for 24-hour to multi-
day assignmentday assignment Destination and origin-based time-dependent Destination and origin-based time-dependent
least-cost path algorithms for various least-cost path algorithms for various applicationsapplications
Vertical integration with TDM and VISSIMVertical integration with TDM and VISSIM
2008 Projects and 2008 Projects and Applications OutlookApplications Outlook
In progressIn progress– Military Deployment Transportation Improvement in Military Deployment Transportation Improvement in
Guam (PB, FHWA)Guam (PB, FHWA)– Interstate highway corridor improvement (TTI, TxDOT, Interstate highway corridor improvement (TTI, TxDOT,
ELPMPO)ELPMPO)– Value Pricing (ORNL, FHWA; SRF, Mn/DOT, TTI, TxDOT)Value Pricing (ORNL, FHWA; SRF, Mn/DOT, TTI, TxDOT)– Evacuation operational planning (UA, ADOT; LSU, LDOT; Evacuation operational planning (UA, ADOT; LSU, LDOT;
Noblis, FHWA; U of Toronto)Noblis, FHWA; U of Toronto)– Integrated Corridor Management modeling (CS, FHWA)Integrated Corridor Management modeling (CS, FHWA)– Bay area regional modeling (CS, MTC)Bay area regional modeling (CS, MTC)– Florida turnpike system traffic and evacuation analysis Florida turnpike system traffic and evacuation analysis
(FDOT Turnpike)(FDOT Turnpike)– Commercial development traffic improvement (PAG)Commercial development traffic improvement (PAG)
Future Outreach Future Outreach ActivitiesActivities ArizonaArizona
– Workshop (July 29-31, jointly funded by Workshop (July 29-31, jointly funded by MAG and FHWA)MAG and FHWA)
MinnesotaMinnesota– Mn/DOT workshop (September 09)Mn/DOT workshop (September 09)
CaliforniaCalifornia– CalTrans and CA MPOs (August 11-13, CalTrans and CA MPOs (August 11-13,
2008)2008) 2-3 Kick-the-Tire webinars (FY 09)2-3 Kick-the-Tire webinars (FY 09) 2-3 Training workshops (FY 09)2-3 Training workshops (FY 09)
FHWA DTA V2.0 FHWA DTA V2.0 Modeling FeaturesModeling Features Suite of supporting tools to facilitate model Suite of supporting tools to facilitate model
use:use:– Pre-processingPre-processing
Network cleaningNetwork cleaning Demand integrationDemand integration
– Post-processingPost-processing Time-space diagramsTime-space diagrams Time-varying link statistics reportsTime-varying link statistics reports Cumulative arrival curvesCumulative arrival curves Impacted vehicle analysisImpacted vehicle analysis Vehicle path analysisVehicle path analysis
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
FHWAFHWA– Jim McCarthyJim McCarthy– Chung TranChung Tran
Mn/DOT Planning DivisionMn/DOT Planning Division– Brian IsaacsonBrian Isaacson– Mark FilipiMark Filipi– Tony FischerTony Fischer
DynusT LabsDynusT Labs– Yi-Chang Chiu, University of ArizonaYi-Chang Chiu, University of Arizona