+ All Categories
Home > Documents > E-Government – a strategic perspective | April 24, 2001

E-Government – a strategic perspective | April 24, 2001

Date post: 13-Feb-2016
Category:
Upload: mandar
View: 45 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
E-Government – a strategic perspective – The approach of Roland Berger Strategy Consultants– European Technology Forum Strasbourg, April 24, 2001. E-Government – a strategic perspective | April 24, 2001. ContentPage. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
29
1 HAM-0 280-9 Navigator E-Government – a strategic perspective – The approach of Roland Berger Strategy Consultants– European Technology Forum Strasbourg, April 24, 2001 E-Government – a strategic perspective | April 24, 2001
Transcript
Page 1: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

1 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

E-Government – a strategic perspective

– The approach of Roland Berger Strategy Consultants–

European Technology Forum

Strasbourg, April 24, 2001

E-Government – a strategic perspective | April 24, 2001

Page 2: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

2 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

This document was created for the exclusive use of our clients. It is not complete unless supported by the underlying detailed analyses and oral presentation. It must not be passed on to third parties except with the explicit prior consent of Roland Berger & Partner GmbH International Management Consultants.

Content Page

A. Initial situation – e-government is a means, a part and an objective of administrative reform

3

B. Need for action – the fields of action result from the gap between vision and reality of e-government

9

C. Options for action – fields of action are prioritized in the e-strategy by the criteria of potential for realization and strategic relevance

19

D. Roland Berger and e-government-projects – our strategic consulting approach encloses the key elements for the realization of e-government

23

Page 3: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

3 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

A. Initial situation – e-government is a means, a part and an objective of administrative reform

Page 4: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

4 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

E-government supports all the important objectives of administrative reform – so it can be a means, a part and an objective of modernization

The most important objectives ofadministrative modernization1) Possible support by e-government

Source: Bertelsmann-Foundation, Roland Berger

1) Poll of the Bertelsmann-Foundation involving 164 mayors in cities with morethan 50.000 inhabitants, Aug./Oct. 2000. Objectives rated as "very important"

Higher satisfaction of citizens

60

61

67

69

73

Better service for companies

Improvement of attractiveness for

companies

Higher effectiveness of administration

Higher economic efficiency of

administration 100%

Easier processing of contacts with the administration

Promotion of economic development online, faster permits, marketplaces for SMEs

Higher attractiveness through better service

Easier processes through electronic support

Cost savings, e.g. through e-procurement

Page 5: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

5 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

E-government is the electronic execution of administrative processes – between administration and the public as well as within the administration

Citizens

Companies

Other administrations

Supporting technologies

Internal communication of politics and administration

g2c, c2g1)

g2b, b2g2)

g2g3)

Public Administration

Strategic partners(hard- and software-firms, banks, local enterprises, … )

Processes and workflows supported by intranet

1) Government to Citizen: e.g. information, citizen services on-line, elections2) Government to Business: e.g. promotion of economic development and permits on-line, procurement3) Government to Government: e.g. joint processing of permits

Front-Office Back-Office

Source: Roland Berger

Page 6: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

6 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

The continuing pressure of social and internal factors strengthens the need for a further administrative modernization

International pressure by competition

• Various innovative approaches towards e-government in other countries

• Customer, i.e. enterprise orientation and rapid permit processing are important factors for attractiveness of a country in the global competition for investors

New models of administration

• International approach of "New Public Management"

• German administrative reform in the nineties under the concept of the "Neue Steuerungsmodell"

Expectations of the citizens

• Experience of the rapidity of the internet

• Expectation of fast, cheap and efficient action by the state and the administration

• Expectation of being treated as a client instead of a solicitor

Technological change

• Growing connectivity of economy and private persons forces administration to catch up

• Digitalization of information and communication eases the coordination tasks of the administration

Source: Roland Berger; PriceWaterhouseCoopers and WIBERA, "Die Zukunft heißt E-Government"

Strong pressure for change from many sides

Page 7: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

7 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

High growth rate of internet usage creates new expectations towards public administration

Source: PWC, "e-Government. Eine Modeerscheinung oder "digitale" Revolution und Zukunft der Städte?", EITO (European Information Technology Observatory), Roland Berger

Growth of number of internet users in Germany1)

Wider distribution of new customer expectations

"What would you like to do from your home via the internet?"(% of persons asked)2)

5,78,0

10,9

13,6

16,1

18,7

21,2

23,7

0

5

10

15

20

25

1997 1998 200420032002200120001999

ConservativeEstimate

Mio.

• "24/7/365“ – rapidity and availability around the clock expected

• Higher convenience – realization from private home hoped for

• Individualized treatment desired

Contact public authorities

22

24

27

40

43

44

50

Transfer money

Order tickets

Book journeys

Buy books

Order from mail order houses

Order food

1) Estimate: EITO 2000 2) PWC-Poll 2000

Backup

Page 8: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

8 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

In Germany the most important field for the application of e-government will be the municipal level, as administrations of all levels agree

Levels of administration with the strongest change by e-government

Source: KPMG, "Verwaltung der Zukunft – Status quo undPerspektiven für e-Government 2000", Roland Berger

100%

64

9

27

4

20

76

8

92

Municipalities

Länder

Federal government

MunicipalitiesLänderFederal government

Appreciation of

Page 9: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

9 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

B. Need for action – the fields of action result from the gap between vision and reality of e-government

Page 10: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

10 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

• 24/7/265 – Citizen services available on-line around the clock

• Information, communication and interaction

• General availability, e.g. by kiosk system

The ultimate vision of e-government is the virtual town hall – the modernization of all fields of administration by the new techniques and media

• Promotion of economic developmentand permit processing on-line

• E-procurement

• Electronic communication with other administrations

• Administration guide / "phone book"

• Joint processing, e.g. of permits or reforms

• Connected IT-landscape without interfaces

• Electronic internal communication of administration

• Electronic internal exchange of documents

• Appropriate partners for operation, financing, hard- and software, content, etc.

• e-processes – complete electronic workflow and document management, supporting the citizen services

Source: Roland Berger

• Assured financing

Page 11: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

11 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

This way, the vision embraces much more than the offering of citizen services on-line – the ideal is a parallel internal modernization of the administration

Source: Roland Berger

Not only build the internet offer upon the existing processes ... … but reform the internal processes as well!

Partial modernization Overall modernization

• Only limited cost savings• No improvement of internal efficiency• Partial understanding of e-government• Possibilities of new techniques are not fully used

• Complete realization of savings potential• More efficient processing• Global understanding of e-government in the frame of

administrative modernization• New techniques and media are used in all spheres of the

administration, front and back office

• Offer of citizen services on-line• Internal processing in the old form – numerous media

breaks1)

• No redesign of internal processes

• Offer of citizen services on-line• Internal processing in seamless electronic workflow –

avoidance of media breaks• Check and optimization of processes

e-Government – partial or overall modernization of the administration

1) A classic example: the citizen's e-mail is printed and put into the circulation file

Page 12: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

12 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

If internal modernization takes place, e-government is a means to lower costs – despite the initial investments

Principle

1) To be reduced by choice of appropriate partners for financing - see pages on financing2) E.g. no more typing of paper forms into a computer program. Example: German electronic tax declaration3) Examples: Munich and Muenster – see pages on document management4) Example: Police of Baden-Wuerttemberg – see pages on e-procurement

Drivers of costs1) Drivers for savings

• Development of e-strategy• Development of applications• Investments in necessary hardware• Training of employees• Public relations

• Cheaper electronic processing, e.g. by– avoidance of media breaks2)

– avoidance of sorting- and filing-time3)

– automatized processing, e.g. of orders4)

• Growth of these effects by further distribution of internet usage and acceptance of the new services by the citizens

• Cost of investments for additional service decreases through effects of scale and through learning effects

Savings

Costs

Time

Page 13: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

13 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

Vision is confronted by reality – e-government in the front-office has only been realised to a small degree in Germany

Information• Guide through administration• Information on industrial areas• Information on economic qualities of site• Local enterprises

Communication• Between citizens and administrative departments

via e-mail• Between various citizens

Interaction• Download of forms• Filling and sending of forms on-line• Digital signature and payment• Digital invitation to tender and decision

Participation• Elections on-line

Number of services

offered

High

LowlMany FewCities which

offer the service

InteractionCommu-nication

Information

Partici-pation

Degrees of realization Degree of realization

Source: Roland Berger

Page 14: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

14 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

Though there are numerous examples for e-government in Germany, in most cases only isolated services are realised electronically

E-signature– Bremen, Nürnberg,

Esslingen, (Chip card)

– Memmelsdorf (digital encryption)

E-forms– County Neumarkt (order of trash cans)– Karlsruhe (various forms)– Other cities and counties

E–payments– Bremen

E-town-marketing– Mannheim as best practice– In principle in all bigger

townsE-PPP

– Berlin: financing of berlin.de by private partners

Internal e-communication– Stuttgart (CUPARLA)– Administration networks

(North-Rhine Westphalia, Bavaria)

E-procurement– Cities of the Erftkreis county– Baden-Wuerttemberg state police

E-processes– Town hall Cologne:

IT-supported workflows

E-public – citizen network

"publikom" in Münster E-document management– München (car registry)– Münster (passport registry)

E-Government

Backup

Page 15: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

15 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

A number of factors prevent the further expansion of e-government

Source: Roland Berger; PriceWaterhouseCoopers and WIBERA, "Die Zukunft heißt E-Government"

Political factors

• Sometimes problematic interaction between politics and administration

Cultural factors

• Lack of service orientation

• Lack of a culture of motivation and innovation

Social factors

• Danger of the "digital divide"

Legal factors

• Prohibition of auctions in calls to tender

• Requirement of handwritten signature for many processes

Technical factors• Insufficient IT-

equipment of town administrations

• Data safety must be secured

• Digital signature requires chip card and reading devices

Financial factors• High initial

investments

• German muni-cipalities name lack of financial freedom as main obstacle to e-government

Lack of strategy• 88% of German cities do not

have an e-strategy

• Cities do not know the expectations of their citizens regarding the cities' web site

Page 16: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

16 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

Some impediments can be overcome by partnerships – appropriate partners useful for the conception, financing and implementation of e-government

Partner

Other cities or counties(horizontalpartnership)

Producers of soft- and hardware

Partners for financing

Content partners for commercial portals

Universities

• Producer takes over development costs and receives future • selling rights

Functions of partnership

• Joint development of concept and IT

• Lower development costs

• Wider reach of joint internet presence

• Joint development of pilot applications

• The public partner saves the development costs

• Private partner finances internet presence, in exchange he receives the right of commercial use of the site

• Integration of all kinds of content by different partners: hotels, real estate market, events, sports, news, ...

• Joint development of new products

• Integration of scientists in decision making in order to gain additional know-how

Examples

• RegioInfo (Baden-Wuerttemberg)

• baynet.de (Bavaria)• RegIS online (Lower Saxony)

• Stuttgart (Berkom)

• Mannheim (SAP)

• Berlin (berlin.de new media GmbH)

• Berlin

• Stuttgart

• Mannheim

Source: Roland Berger

Page 17: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

17 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

Partnerships can contribute to the financing of e-government in a number of ways

Case-by-case payment

• A private partner develops an application for the on-line transaction of citizen services

• The public partner pays a fixed fee for each transaction made via the application

• Lower transaction costs compared to traditional transaction makes for a savings effect1)

Joint development of applications

• Joint development of software• Public partner serves as a test user for piloting• The private partner pays the costs of development and

receives the rights of future selling of the application

Life events-related advertising

• Integration of private partners into the needs listed under each "life event"

• Examples: for the life event "registration": links to a bank, to utility firms etc.; for the life event "marriage" links to shopping malls etc.

Site operation by private company

• Private partner takes over the costs and the operation of the site, in exchange he receives the name rights and the right of commercial usage

• Public partner cares for the "official" content on administration etc.

Source: Roland Berger, McKinsey Quarterly

Financing models for e-Government

1) E.g. in Hong Kong: 0,80 instead of 1,90$ average transaction costs

Page 18: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

18 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

Further possibilities for financing arise from the adaptation of the functioning of private internet portals

Source: Roland Berger

The internet presence of a city should not be understood as a static offer of information ...

... but as a portal, which offers an entry to all kind of information on the town...

... and so allows a commercial use of the site

Theatre

Shops

Hotels

Administration

News

sel-ling

User

Vendor

Portal

Ads

seeksserviceor product

brings user

€ €Sport

informa-tion/na-vigation

Page 19: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

19 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

C. Options for action – fields of action are prioritized in the e-strategy according to criteria of potential for realization and strategic relevance

Page 20: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

20 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

The broad scope of the subject makes it impossible to realize e-government simultaneously everywhere – it is a essential to have an e-strategy

Definition of an e-strategy

• Concentration on the fields with the highest strategic potential

• Start at the interfaces of fields

– High effectiveness– Strong chance for

integration

• Making up of a global strategy and vision – but implementation of this vision in small easy-to-realize steps

• Concrete, small e-realization projects instead of long and fruitless e-discussions

Cross sectionfields

Impossibility of simultaneous development in all fields

Isolated fields

Citizen services

Enterprise services (Promotion of econo- mic development, marketplaces, etc.)

E-procurement

Internal workflow and document management

Internal communication

Processes IT Partnering Financing

Source: Roland Berger

Page 21: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

21 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

The fields of action are prioritized by the criteria of potential for realization and strategic relevance

Evaluation of each application and step-by-step implementation

Step 1 Step 2 Step 3

Potential of realization

Big

Small

High LowStrategic relevance

Source: Roland Berger

Page 22: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

22 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

The weighting of the criteria determines the final evaluation of both dimensions

Strategic relevanceQuality of service Image

effectEfficiency Subjective

urgencyImprovement of

connectivityUse of media

25% 25% 25% 5% 10% 10%X X X X X X

+ + + +

=

+

=

+

Potential for realization

Ec. effectiveness25%X

Technical aspects

15%X+

Organiz. aspects15%X

Legal possibility

15%X

+

Step 3Step 2Step 1

Pol. acceptance30%X

+

Source: Roland Berger

Page 23: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

23 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

D. Roland Berger and e-government-projects – our strategic consulting approach encloses the key elements for the realization of e-government

Page 24: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

24 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

The strategic approach of Roland Berger helps municipalities overcome the typical hurdles of e-Government

Support by strategic and holistic consulting approach of Roland Berger

• Knows and respects the complex realities of public administration

• Cooperation of Roland Berger with IT-partners guarantees competence in the sphere of politics and administration as well as in technical questions; a mere IT-consultant is not enough in order to overcome the hurdles

e-governmenttoday

Vision ofe-government

tomorrow

Financial hurdlesTechnical hurdles

Legal hurdlesCultural hurdles

Political hurdles

Source: Roland Berger

Page 25: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

25 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

Roland Berger's contribution to project success resides in our combination of administrative and e-experience

Contribution of Roland Berger

Experience in public administration

• Competence Center Public Services – numerous projects in all spheres of the public sector

• Knowledge of the public administration

• Experience of projects and implementation of modernization and reforms in public administration

• Knowledge of political and administrative proceedings and frameworks

e-experience

• Over 100 realised e-projects in private economy

• Broad coverage of all fields – from processes, organization and technique to marketing, portals and marketplaces

• Knowledge of proceedings used in the private economy

Source: Roland Berger

Page 26: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

26 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

The consulting approach of Roland Berger contains all the key elements of a successful implementation of e-government

Source: Roland Berger

Parallel measures• Integration of all relevant players from politics and administration• Choice of appropriate partners

IT-audit• Analysis of IT-strategy

• Analysis of IT-processes, infrastructure and applications

• Analysis of options for action• Prioritization according to

specific client needs• Recommendation of individual

approach

e-government-strategy• Analysis of actual

processes regarding the proposed strategy• Definition of target processes

• Definition of necessary IT and comparison with results of IT-audit

Redesign of processes• Choice of pilot field and pilot

application

Piloting and implementation

• Evaluation and communication of results

• Implementation

1 3 4

2

5

Page 27: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

27 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

The Roland Berger strategy audit identifies strategic potentials for e-government and elaborates individual approaches

Source: Roland Berger

Process Aims

• Classification of tasks of the institution analyzed in the scheme of isolated and cross section fields

• Definition of appropriate project approach, which promises highest degree of optimization

• Analysis of single fields following economic and political criteria

– Discussion of options

– Evaluation and prioritization of options

• Evaluation of strategic position compared to other administrations/political institutions

• Evaluation of tasks and performance of the institution– Internal view– External view

• Identification of future challenges

• Identification of strategic strengths and weaknesses and oh biggest levers for e-government

Strategy audit

Recommendationof individualapproach for e-government

1

Backup

Page 28: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

28 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

The existing IT is checked for its e-government aptness in four different fields

Structure of IT-audit

IT-strategy• Definition of tasks

• Vision

• Self-understanding

• Standards

IT-processes• Operation• User training / support• Software development• Procurement• Project management

Applications• Fulfillment of tasks

Infrastructure

• Hardware

• Capacity for integration• Network

• Future appropriateness• Internet connection

Fit for e-Government?

• Satisfaction of users

2

Backup

Page 29: E-Government – a strategic perspective     |   April 24, 2001

29 HAM-0280-97000-01-01.ppt

Navigator

The profound and complex process of change can be managed successfully with a step-by-step acceleration

All processes and offices

Only pilot processes

Integrated processesand office

Piloting Transfer to similar offices

Global roll-out

Communicationof pilot results

Preparation of all employees for the new structures

(training/ workshops)

Gradualimplementation of

e-government

Scheme


Recommended