E507 URBAN TRANSPORATION PROJECT (MUTP) · 2016-07-14 · e507 volume 9 miuma metropolitan reion...

E507Volume 9

MIUMA METROPOLITAN REiON DSVKLOPMIIPT AUTHORITY(MKRDA

MU1M URBAN TRANSPORATION PROJECT (MUTP)

FMAL REPOWr OF COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL KANAGEUT PLAN(CUP)

FOR TRANSIT RESET1rLMENT SITE AT KANJU1RMARO

JUNE 2002

PREPARED BY

MCOM POLLUTION CONTROL COWSULTANTS

4-5, DIAMONID COURT, 142, LADY JAMlHEDJ ROAD

MAE, MUMAA - 400 016

PHONZ: 444 3325 7AX444 3308 ItMAfl: ecom (v=Lom

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

Pub

lic D

iscl

osur

e A

utho

rized

wb350881

Typewritten Text

E2548 v9

CONTENTS

CHAPTER Pg. No

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

INTRODUCTION 5Annexure 1.1 Site Location Plan 10Annexure 1.2 Applicable Indian Laws and World Bank

Safeguards Policies 11

2. SUB-PROJECT DESCRIPTION, ANALYSIS OFALTERNATIVES AND SELECTION OF SITE 19Annexure 2.1 Site Layout Plan 20

AndExhibits of Site 21

3. BASELINE ENVIRONMENT 31

4. IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 32

Annexure 4.1 Minutes Of The Meeting With The PAH's 37

5. COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENTPLAN 41

Annexure 5.1 Kanjurmarg Transit Camp Site CEMPPhase - I (Existing Conditions) 45

Annexure 5.1 Kanjurmarg Transit Camp Site CEMPPhase - II During Construction 49

Annexure 5.2 A Do's And Don'ts To BeCirculated Amongst EMC's 52

Annexure 5.2 B Do's And Don'ts To BeCirculated AmongstInhabitants 54

CONTENTS

CHAPTER Pg. No

Annexure 5.3 A Translation Of "Synopsis"Of Annexure 5.2 In LocalLanguage 55

Annexure 5.4 Monitoring Indicators Phase - I 57

Annexure 5.4 Monitoring Indicators Phase - II 61

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

BEST Bombay Electric Supply and TransportUndertaking

BMC Bombay Municipal Corporation

BSES Baseline Socio Economic Society

CEMP Community Environment Management Plan.

CO Carbon Monoxide

CRZ Coastal Regulation Zone

DCR Development Control Regulations

EA Environmental Assessment

EHS Environment, Health and Safety

EMC Environmental Management Committee

EMP Environment Management Plan

FSI Floor Space Index

GOM Government of Maharashtra

HC Hydrocarbons

IBRD International Bank of Reconstruction andDevelopment

IDA International Development Association

JVLR Jogeshwari Vikhroli Link Road

MCBM Municipal Corporation of Brihan Mumbai

MCGM Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai

MHADA Maharashtra Housing and Area DevelopmentAuthority

MMR Mumbai Metropolitan Region

MMRDA Mumbai Metropolitan Region DevelopmentAuthority

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

MoEF Ministry of Environment and Forest

MPCB Maharashtra Pollution Control Board

MSEB Maharashtra State Electricity Board

MTNL Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited

MUTP Mumbai Urban Transport Project

NGO Non-Governmental Organisation

NO, Nitrogen Oxides

OD Operational Directive (of the World Bank)

PAH's Project Affected Households

PCC Project Coordinating Committee

PIA Project Implementation Agency

PIC Public Information Center

PIL Public Interest Litigation

PMC Project Management Consultants

RAP Resettlement Action Plan

R&R Resettlement and Rehabilitation

RIP Resettlement Implementation Plan

ROB Road Over (RAIL) Bridge

SPARC Society For The Promotion Of AreaResource Centre

SO 2 Sulphur Di Oxide

SRS Slum Rehabilitation Society

TDR Transfer of Development Rights

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Mumbai Urban Transport Project (MUTP) conceptualized in 1994 envisages

substantial improvements in both the rail and the non-rail infrastructure primarily to

encourage public transport. The Project is to be implemented jointly by Government

of Maharashtra (GOM), Indian Railways, BEST, MCBM and MSRDC. A total of

19,000 Project Affected Households (PAH's) are likely to be affected by the Project

and required to be re-settled in accordance to Resettlement and Rehabilitation

(R & R) policy adopted by GOM for MUTP. Resettlement Action Plan (RAP - April,

2002) prepared by MMRDA provides the details of R & R Policy, socio-economic

characteristics of PAH, resettlement entitlements and the institutional framework.

The applicable Indian Laws and World Bank Safeguard policies within which this

resettlement will be carried out for this Sub-Project and overall MUTP are presented

in Article 1.2 of this Report.

Therefore, as a part of Project preparation, a site specific Community Environmental

Management Plan (CEMP) is prepared to meet the requirements of OP 4.01

guidelines published by the World Bank for each Sub-Project Site along with a

Resettlement Implementation Plan (RIP).

MMRDA appointed M/s. ECON POLLUTION CONTROL CONSULTANTS in

January 2002 to prepare a CEMP for Transit Resettlement Site at Kanjurmarg where

PAH's are temporarily based due to provision of 5 1h and 6th additional railway tracks

between Kurla and Thane. This site falls under Option 'A' category of the RAP.

MMRDA proposes to convert this Transit Camp into a Permanent Resettlement Site

at a later date.

The social economical and environmental conditions in the slums from where the

PAH's have been shifted to Transit Camps varied from pocket to pocket but was by

and large unhygienic with poor living and sanitary conditions.

The PAH's have been earlier residing in unorganized housing or slums. Being

unorganized, the state of infrastructural facilities in the slums was poor and

substandard. Electricity and water supply was mostly tapped illegally. The service

charges for facilities were mostly paid to the slumlords in the area. The law and order

situation in the slums was also grim. The sanitary conditions were very poor. Solids

waste was dumped haphazardly in the area.

The implementation of CEMP for the Transit Camp is targeted at improving status of.

PAH's in terms of their social and environmental conditions.

A number of consultation meetings were undertaken by M/s ECON through MMRDA

and the local NGO's. Through these meetings and based on our experience of other

resettlement sites, environmental impacts have been identified for present conditions

of transit accommodation and during construction of permanent buildings.

M/s ECON has now prepared a site-specific CEMP for the Transit Resettlement Site,

which addresses issues related to improve the environmental conditions at the Transit

Site in terms of urban infrastructure services only. CEMP also recommends

mitigatory actions to be implemented during construction of the Permanent Housing.

Recommendations And Conclusions:

CEMP - Phase I gives issue-wise recommendations for improving the social and

environmental conditions of the PAH's at the Transit Camp in the immediate future. It

also identifies issues, agency responsible, time frame, with their costs for

implementation .The cost for Phase I is Rs.13,40,000/-.

CEMP - Phase II gives site-specific recommendations on issues related to impacts

due to activities for the construction of Permanent Housing. It also identifies the

agencies responsible, time frame for implementation. The costs for Phase II are not

included here and are deemed to have been included in the individual construction

contracts for Permanent Buildings. MMRDA will ensure that recommended

mitigatory actions are clearly specified in these tender documents.

The recommendations include immediate formation and functioning of the EMC's

through the local NGO. For the general guidance of the EMC's and the Residents, a

list of Do's and Don'ts in simple language along with its translation in local language

is attached to form a part of larger awareness education and participation programme.

The role of the EMC's will continue and ultiirnately merge into post-implementation

stage for Permanent Housing.

The implementation of the CEMP should be monitored by MMRDA through the

NGO's / PMC's as appropriate based on the monitoring indicators put forth.

Corrective action, wherever necessary, to ensure that good housekeeping practices

and local laws for environmental parameters will be complied with.

It is expected that on implementation of CEMP - Phase 1, the PAH's will be able to

live in the near future in the Transit Camp with much better amenities than those

available presently. CEMP - Phase II will ensure a peaceful co-existence when

construction activities for Permanent Housing are undertaken by MMRDA.

The conditions of the PAH will improve on successful implementation of both the

phases of CEMP at the Transit Camp site. Also, the conditions of the PAH's are

likely to further improve on both social and environmental fronts when they are

ultimately resettled at the Permanent Resettlement Housing proposed to be developed

by MMRDA at this same Site at Kanjurmarg.

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Overview

1.1.1 Mumbai, over the last few decades, has emerged as the financial and

commercial capital of India. Greater Mumbai's population that was

around 4 million in 1961 is now 11.9 million in 2001. The urban

growth has spread beyond the boundaries of Municipal Corporation of

Greater Mumbai (MCGM) in the northern, northeastern and eastern

directions mainly along the suburban rail corridors to form Mumbai

Metropolitan Region (MMR). Greater Mumbai has an area of 438 sq.

km and a population of 11.9 million and the MMR has an area of 4354

sq. km and a population of about 18 million. By 2011, MMR is

expected to have a population of 22 million. MMR generates about 5%

of national GDP and contributes to over one third of India's tax

revenues.

1.1.2 As a result of population growth and increase in private ownership of

vehicles, public transport is under severe stress. Until now, solutions to

Mumbai's acute transport problems have been hindered by the likely

magnitude of displacement and resettlement of slum dwellers by the

fragmentation of institutional responsibilities and the inadequacy of

financial resources.

1.1.3 The transport challenges of Mumbai are compounded by the fact that

over 50 % of Mumbai's population lives in squatter settlements. These

settlements are most often located on publicly owned land and land

reserved for public purposes in the master plans, including the land

reserved for roads, road widening and along the rail tracks. Managing

the resettlement and rehabilitation of a large number of households and

businesses therefore becomes a critical part of most transport projects.

1.1.4 Mumbai Urban Transportation Project (MUTP) has been

conceptualized in 1994 to improve transportation in the Mumbai

region.

The major components of MUTP are:

1. Rail Transport Component

* Railway system - Capacity, Optimization and Enhancement

* Setting up new corridors

* Purchase of rolling stock

2. Road Transport Component

* Road Transport - Traffic Management (TM) and related

measures including Area Traffic Control (traffic signal system),

bus priority and rail station area transport integration.

* Road Transport - Infrastructure, including roads and road even

rail bridges

* Road Transport - Equipment (procurement of buses)

3. Resettlement and Rehabilitation.

* Construction of 19,000 permanent dwelling units.

* Construction of 6,000 transit dwelling units.

* Land acquisition and R & R assistance.

Each component has related provisions for environmental protection

and improvement, institutional capacity building and training.

1.1.5 Environmental Assessment Process and Impacts due to Sub-Projects

The EA consists of:

* Sectoral Environmental Analysis (SLEA) of the three strategic

transport options for MMR identified as part of CTS (1998).

* Sub-project level Environmental Assessment undertaken by

way of:

o Programmatic Level Environmental Assessment

(PLEA) of generic sub-projects (1998).

o Micro-Level Environmental Assessment (MLEA) of

sub-projects projects with a potential for significant

environmental issues. (1998)

Consolidated EA, which brings together the

updated findings of the above-mentioned

documents into a comprehensive document.

(2002).

Typical environmental impacts of subprojects have been categorized

into impacts during the construction phase and during the operation

phase. These impacts are expected to be in respect of the following

environmental resources:

* Ambient Air Quality Deterioration

* Increase in Noise Levels

* Adverse Impacts on Ecology (Flora/Fauna)

* Population displacement

* Land degradation

* Surface and groundwater degradation

* Occupational health and safety

* Impacts on Traffic and road safety

1.1.6 GOM in March 1997 adopted an R & R Policy for the R & R of PAH

affected by the MUTP. The main objective of the R & R Policy is to

avoid or minimize the displacement by exploring all the viable

alternative designs and where unavoidable execute the resettlement

action plan to enable the Project Affected Persons to improve their

living standards.

MMRDA has prepared RAP. This RAP contains the details on policy

provisions and legal framework, magnitude of land acquisition and

displacement, findings of socio-economic surveys and baseline

characteristics, organizational responsibilities. The process adopted

under two stage resettlement, generic time table for construction of

transit and permanent housing, and consolidated costs and budgets.

The RAP also identified criteria for judging the completion of R & R

and monitoring indicators for physical and financial progress. The

RAP also describes the Community Environmental Management Plan

(CEMP).

The dwelling units required for the resettlement of the PAH's are

proposed to be procured in three different ways;

Option A: In this option building construction is directly contracted

the PMU by following the World Bank procurement guidelines for

works, on land obtained through TDR or land transferred by GOM.

7.97 ha. of land has been identified for constructing about 4000

dwelling units under this option.

Option B: The land and dwelling units are procured under this method

by inviting competitive bids from developers against the TDR benefits

that would accrue to the developers for land and the construction area.

(Please refer to paragraph 33 for details of TDR). Approximately

12000 dwelling units will be constructed under this option and the

Executive Committee of MMRDA has approved the evaluation of bids

on 22 February 2002. Work is expected to be awarded shortly.

Option C: Dwelling units already constructed by Maharashtra

Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA) are purchased in

this option at a price ranging between Rs.1,25,000/- and Rs. 2,00,000/-

per dwelling unit depending upon the location. The TDR benefit

accrues to MHADA in this case. 4000 Dwelling units under this option

have already been procured.

1.1.7 MUTP involves resettlement of about 19,000 PAH's. The Site at

Kanjurmarg is to the north of the Road Over Bridge along the

Jogeshwari - Vikhroli Link Road (JVLR).

The plot of land at Kanjurmarg where transit accommodation has been

constructed on a temporary basis was originally reserved to be

developed as a Permanent Resettlement Site.

MMRDA proposes to construct about 23 residential buildings

containing 1,614 residential tenements of 20.91 sq.rnts each and 210

shops. The 850 PAH's residing in the Transit Camps at Kanjurmarg

will be re-settled in the permanent resettlement buildings developed at

the same Site. The location of the Site at Kanjurmarg is marked in the

map of Mumbai in Annexure 1.1

MMRDA now proposes to prepare a site specific CEMP for the Transit

Resettlement Site at Kanjurmarg.

1.1.8 The main objective of the study is to improve the environment in the

future and during the construction phase of the Permanent Housing at

the Transit Camp Site. The specific objectives are as follows:

1. To identify the basic environmental and sanitation related

issues such as water supply, sewage disposal, solid waste

management, access road, storm water drain, mosquito

nuisance, etc in the temporary dwelling units at Kanjurmarg

Transit Resettlement Sites.

2. To identify the environmental and health impacts issues on the

community.

3. To improve Project Affected Person's knowledge on

environmental issues and enhance their ability to participate

directly by identifying, evaluating and receiving the benefits

among themselves.

4. To prepare the Community Environmental Management Plan

for the temporary dwelling units.

5. To reduce impact on the PAH's staying in the Transit Camp

during construction of the permanent dwelling units.

M/s. ECON POLLUTION CONTROL CONSULTANTS have been appointed

to prepare the site-specific CEMP for this Transit Resettlement Site at

Kanjurmarg.

1.2 Applicable Indian Laws and World Bank Safeguards Policies:

1.2.1 The applicable Indian Laws and World Bank Safeguards with a brief

overview that are applicable to the overall MUTP are presented in

Annexure 1.2.

1.2.2 The Indian Laws and World Bank Safeguards Policies that are

applicable to this CEMP / Sub-Project are:

a) The Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Preservation of Trees Act,

1975

b) The Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960

c) Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966

d) Development Control Regulations for Greater Mumbai, 1991

e) Environmental Assessment (OP 4.01)

f) Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.30).

ANNEXURE 1.1

SITE LOCATION PLAN

LOCATION MAP SHOWING KANJURMARG TRANSIT RESETTLEMENT SITE

Mumbai 4w~~~~~~~~~~oaiPMancw

-. 4 r..Z. ; n i.

'C

:~~~~~~~~~~~~~ AC.;-.,,; - Ya -sh' *-nc c

mloUlva

-. IV- O8d-~'SatNa

* -,AR;Y8 , l

~~~~a ruz,- -

Ma'h'irn.Ba~~~~~~~~~~~~~Ma ott Sd

ANNEXURE 1.2

APPLICABLE INDIAN LAWS AND WORLDBANK SAFEGUARDS POLICIES

ANNEXURE 1.2 APPLICABLE INDIAN LAWS AND WORLD BANK

SAFEGUARD POLICIES

A brief overview of key provisions of the policy, legal framework and safeguard policies

applicable overall to the MUTP are provided below:

A. APPLICABLE INDIAN LEGAL REQUIREMENTS

1. LEGISLATION RELATED TO ENVIRONMENT:

There are various Acts, Rules and Notifications applicable for different

environmental components such as Air Pollution, Water Pollution, Noise

Pollution, Coastal Areas, Hazardous Materials Handling and Transport, Forest

and Wildlife, etc. In addition, regulatory provisions by way of environmental

clearance also exist. The applicable regulations are listed below.

Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986

This is an umbrella act for environmental protection. Various rules and

notifications are issued from time to time under the provisions of this Act.

Environmental Protection Rules (2000) specify standards for ambient air quality

whereas Noise Pollution (Regulation and Control) Rules, 2000 provide for the

ambient noise standards in public places. However legal mechanism to achieve

these are not explicit in terms of emission at source in transport sector except for

the vehicle emission norms like Euro II or Bharat 11 that have been prescribed.

The Environmental Impact Assessment Notification, 1994 (as amended in May

1994) make environmental clearance mandatory for 29 categories of

developmental projects listed in Schedule 1 of the notification. Railways are not

listed in schedule 1 and hence do not need environmental clearance. For other

components under MUTP, MoEF has confirmed that environmental clearance is

not required.

Coastal Regulation Zone Notification 1991

The notification provides for determining certain areas between the Low Tide

Line (LTL) and High Tide Line (HTL) and adjacent land ward area as the Coastal

Regulation Zone and its classification into CRZ I (ecologically sensitive), CRZ II

(where development has already occurred) and CRZ III the residual area (largely

rural in character). The notification also prescribes prohibited activities in CRZ

and activities that can be taken up with the approval of MoEF. Reclamation being

a prohibited activity cannot be undertaken in CRZ 1. This restricts use of such

lands for R & R. MoEF clearance is required for Borivali Virar Railway section

that traverses the Vasai Creek and adjoining wetland which is a Coastal

Regulation Zone though construction of such links is a permitted activity in CRZ.

This clearance has been requested and is being processed.

The Maharashtra Felling Of Trees (Regulation) Act 1964

GOM legislation requires every local authority to constitute a tree authority. No

tree can be felled without the permission of this authority. Trees in the right of

way of roads can be removed with the permission of this authority, which may

prescribe transplanting or compensatory plantation.

LEGISLATION RELATED TO R & R

Land Acquisition Act 1894 (La Act):

This act provides for compulsory acquisition of land for public purposes by

paying compensation at the market rate with 30% solatium for the compulsory

nature of acquisition and interest at 12 percent per annum from the date of

notification.

Maharashtra Regional And Town Planning Act, 1966 (Mr&Tp Act):

The Act provides for preparation of Development Plans (Master Plans). These

plans designate land required for public purposes, which can then be acquired in

conjunction with the provisions of Land Acquisition Act. The act also provides a

statutory framework for formulation and enforcement of Development Control

Regulations.

Development Control Regulations For Greater Mumbai 1991 (Dcrs):

These regulations prepared under the MR & TP Act offer an alternative to

acquisition under LA Act by way of Transfer of Development Rights (TDR). The

permissible Floor Space Index (FSI) defines the development rights of every

parcel of land in Mumbai. If a particular parcel of land is designated for a public

purpose the landowner has an option of accepting monetary compensation under

the LA Act 1894 or accept TDR (equivalent to the plot area times the permissible

FSI), which can be sold in the market for use elsewhere in Mumbai. The DC

Regulations have been amended to provide incentives for rehabilitation (including

resettlement of slum dwellers) in 1997. For landowners prepared to provide

225 sq.ft. dwelling units free of cost to slum dwellers, the incentive is in the form

of right to build and sell floor space equivalent to that required for slum

rehabilitation subject to the maximum in-situ utilization of FSI of 2.5. The

remainder of the total development rights can be used as TDR. In case of land

designated for resettlement of slum dwellers affected by infrastructure projects,

the land owner has an option of offering dwelling units to the project

implementing agency free of cost and getting the benefit of maximum of TDR

equivalent to floor area calculated at FSI of 3.5 (1 for land and 2.5 for the built-up

area). The DCRs also set out the standards for building design and construction,

provision of services like water supply, sewerage, site drainage, access roads,

elevators, fire fighting etc. Buildings procured for R & R have to conform to these

DCRs. Up-front clearance of the entire project is however not required under the

DCR. Approvals are to be obtained for individual scheme, as it gets prepared.

iv The Maharashtra Co-Operative Societies Act 1960:

This act provides for establishing, registering and administering the co-operative

societies. Housing co-operative is a special form of co-operative society, where

the land and building is owned by the co-operative and its members have

occupancy rights of apartment occupied by them. Sale and purchase of such units

can take place only with the consent of the society. This is a common form of

tenure in Mumbai's apartment buildings and is widely understood.

B. APPLICABLE WORLD BANK SAFEGUARD POLICIES

Given that MUTP has been developed with the intention of mobilizing financial

resources from the World Bank, project preparation has included a number of

studies and assessments which have sought to address and meet the requirements

of the World Bank's environmental and social policies, often referred as the

'safeguard' policies. The next paragraphs provide a summary overview of how

these guidelines have been considered. Several policies were found not to have

been triggered and are therefore not discussed any further.

Environmental Assessment (OP 4.01):

In the context of the Bank's Operational Policy (OP) 4.01 on Environmental

Assessment, MUTP has been classified as category "A" project, largely on the

basis of the large numrber of people requiring resettlement and rehabilitation.

Because of the large-scale resettlement and the triggering of more than one

safeguard policy the project is also classified as "S1" in terms of safeguard issues.

A consolidated EA including SEA and sub-project specific EAs and EMPs have

been prepared in compliance with the World Bank policy.

Cultural Property (OP 4.11):

Mumbai with its history of nearly three hundred years is rich in cultural property

particularly in the form of built heritage. GOM and MCGM are acutely aware of

the need to conserve such heritage. GOM in 1995 with the involvement of'NGOs

listed over 600 buildings and precincts as of heritage significance. DCR 67

governs the development of these listed buildings and precincts. GOM has also

constituted a Heritage Conservation Committee in 1995 to advise the Municipal

Commissioner regarding development permission to be granted in case of listed

buildings and precincts. No development permission can be granted of the listed

buildings or within the precincts without the consent of the Heritage Committee.

None of the MUTP sub-projects, except the pedestrian subways, directly or

indirectly affect heritage buildings. Some of the pedestrian facilities in the Island

City notably one near the CST would be located in the heritage precinct. The

design consultants have been advised to take cognizance of this fact. In any case

the proposals will be subject to the review of the Heritage Conservation

Committee.

During the execution of works, if a "chance find "of archaeological significance

occurs, the contract requires the contractor to immediately inform the employer

and stop further work. Employer will in turn inform the state Archaeology

Department for further investigation.

In addition to the listed buildings, there are smaller common cultural properties

like shrines, small temples or mosques within the project-affected communities.

Thus this policy applies to the project. These have been identified during the

BSES and the RIP's cover their resettlement. In case of JVLR Phase I there are

9 small temples, which will be relocated according to the RIP prepared in

consultation with the PAH's.

Natural Habitat (OP 4.04):

Mumbai's notable natural habitat is limited to the 103 sq.km. National Park at

Borivali, which is located in the northern part of the peninsula between the two

rail corridors and the coastal wetlands in the eastern and western suburbs. The

MoEF protects both through variety of legal and administrative mechanisms. The

National Park is protected under the Indian Forest Act whereas the coastal

wetlands are protected by the Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) Notification of 19

February 1991. None of the subprojects pass through these areas except a section

of 4.5 km. of the Borivali - Virar Railway line that (total length 26 km.) crosses

the Vasai Creek and the adjoining wetlands having degraded mangroves. The area

of the wetland directly affected is less than 5000 sq.m. out of a total extent of

wetland of 48 sq.km. Bridges traversing the CRZ are not prohibited but require

environmental clearance. MoEF has already been approached for the approval

under the CRZ Notificationln case of JVLR an area of 2000 sq.m. is observed to

have dwarf and stunted mangroves. This also has weeds and garbage. The

construction of road has been approved as a part of CZMP by MoEF. However

suitable measures to enhance the growth of mangroves have been included in the

EMP. In an effort to provide immediate temporary transit accommodation for

squatters, in response to a court order with stringent implementation schedule,

resulted in an inadvertent breach of the coastal zone regulations at the transit sites

at Mankhurd and Turbhe and Mandale. GOM has now undertaken to move all

squatters currently housed in transit accommodation to their permanent

accommodation within a period of not more than three years. Environmental audit

of these transit camps has also been carried out to determine how the land under

CRZ can be restored to its original status after the dismantling of transit houses.

Thus, although the impacts on natural habitat are small, the policy applies, and

has been complied with.

iv. Involuntary Resettlement (OP 4.30):

MUTP will require resettlement of about 19000 households (77000 persons). The

World Bank Policy on Involuntary Resettlement is therefore applicable to the

project. In compliance with to this policy an R & R Policy has been prepared and

adopted by GOM for MUTP. RAP and sub-project specific RIPs are being

prepared. RIPs including CEMPs have been prepared for four sub-projects

scheduled for commencement in the first year. The project is therefore in

compliance with the policy.

v. Indigenous People (OP 4.20):

About 1% of the PAH's belong to the Scheduled Tribes. A field based review was

undertaken to determine if these PAH's were subject to application of this Policy

since they might have originally belonged to tribal communities in the distant

past. As of now they are integrated with the city life and do not have their

traditional habitat or follow traditional ways of life. More particularly, (a) they no

longer have close attachment to ancestral territories; (b) they do not identify

themselves or are identified by others as distinct cultural group; (c) they do not

speak an indigenous language; and (d) they no longer belong to customary social

and political institutions. There is also a general reluctance to reveal the caste or

tribe particularly pronounced when data is to be kept in public domain. It was

determined by the review that the social impact of the project on such people is

therefore similar to that on other PAH's and thus the policy does not apply. No

separate Indigenous Peoples Development Plan (IPDP) has therefore been

prepared.

CHAPTER 2

SUB-PROJECT DESCRIPTION, ANALYSIS OFALTERNATIVES AND SELECTION OF SITES

CHAPTER 2 SUB-PROJECT DESCRIPITION, ANALYSIS OFALTERNATIVES AND SELECTION OF SITE

2.1 The residents of Kanjurmarg transit camp site are essentially Project Affected

Households who were residing in slums along the rail tracks from Kurla to

Thane.

2.2 The residents were re-settled in a transit camp site at Kanjurmarg. which was

reserved for construction of permanent resettlement houses.

2.3 The area of the plot is 27,582.2 sq.mts. The net area after deducting setback

areas, embankment and railway reservation is 20,959.45 sq.mts. A portion of

this Site will be consumed in ROB widening and its embankment. Similarly, a

reservation has been kept for 5 th and 6Lh railway track between Kurla and

Thane.

2.4 MMRDA proposes to construct 23 numbers of buildings having 1614

residential tenements and 210 shops.

2.5 The Present Site is having a Transit camp where 850 PAH's reside. Additional

tenements would be used to house PAH's from other components of MUTP.

2.6 The condition of the transit houses is not good and most houses need to be

repaired. The residents are managing to live on with the hope of being able to

shift to better houses provided by MMRDA some day.

2.7 MMRDA proposes to start construction at the open space in the same Site and

shift Transit camp Residents phase-wise into the permanent residential

tenements.

2.8 There are no alternative sites analysed as the PAH's presently living in transit

camps are proposed to be permanently resettled at this very site.

2.9 The Site Layout, Photographs of the site with its surroundings are attached as

Annexure 2.1.

ANNEXURE 2.1

SITE LAYOUT PLANAND

EXHIBITS OF SITE

-~~to-

I

| 45 75 mn WIDE JOGESHWARI V16

I .

I l 1 ' i

VIKHROLI LINK ROAD.._EM BANKM EN T \

--

0~00IIX

5GGm WIDE ROA D

ii~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c

w

E

> f . _ _ a

IF 1i I C)1

:EC X I Z [/'I IA I XA I L

15-20 m

EXISTINGSTRUCTURE TO \

BE DEMOUSHEtD-

6 00 m Wl DE R OA D.

11.16 16 16 16 1L. 1L 1L. 1

_ .w

1N' C. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r. C

\ll±E6l001 i I D:1-I-''l'L

16o 16 1- - 1 1 1f4 T

\ ''-1- 1'1' I. ILt I. -I T

1\E~EE 1Ul'lJ-lX m~~~12

2 2

U'~~

| t Et I>LILEX 1 183F

I .l..,- - --

12 ' *~*S1

7

22

REV. DESCRI PTION DRN. C HK. DAT E

CLi ENTM. M .R. D. A. MUMBAI.

JOBCOMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLANFOR 'nAMMr TENEM ENTS AT KANJ

TITLE

LAYOUT PLAN OF PLOTNO- C.T.S. 120

DRAWN DESIGNED CHECKED DATE APPROVED

S.S.Kadam H.S.Thakker G.K.Thevar '1-2-2002 V. N. Khar kor

econ pollution control consultants S CALE

4-5 diamond court lStfLoor 142-144,tady jamshedji road"

mahim. mumbai - 400 016 DRG NO.tel.. no. 4443325 con/MMRDwW07fcx. no .44433 08

I r. ?

EXHIBIT I. ENTRANCE TO THE PLOT CTS 120 EXISTING TRANSIT CAMPSIE AT KARVE NAGAR RESETTLEMENT COLONY,KANJMRMARG

-)~~~--

i- . -

' }_'~~~~- _ *

EXHIBIT 2: COMMON OPEN SPACE WHICH IS PROPOSED) TO BE USED) FORSTARTUP FOR CONSTRUCTING PERMANENT HOUSINCI

7.!-

,VICTUpS

JOF-H

EXHIBIIT 3 PlCTA

SHOWS LE OF TRS S TO BE

, RWWENThG ROAD OVEFRUG

LNGJGSN rHMIROLI

LNK ROAD

X1134 SINGE ROW OF TRANSIT HOUSES TO EAST OF ACCESS R'OAD

EXUIT SNOTGCMP WAALL AND) PLOT OF JOLLY BOARDJ BEHIND

NOTEICH SNTCIUND w 3Y?, CRZ IUS

WC-i IS Aff EC' M

f_ _f

*~~~~~~~ -7: - F-

41;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.

'i;~~~~ ;> jr 1' A. .*,

EXHIBIT 5 COMMON ELECTRIC METER FOR ENTIRE COMPLEX.

~~1w .- - -,L -

w wjjij77! . -- js-]

EXHIBIT 6 MTNL JUNCTION BOX AVAILABLE WITHThN THE COMPLEX

,,I - <- toXI !>''41

. . - tz -~ - Irl'

r.. i ,. t -_*

EXHIBIT 7 STORM NALLAH PASSING THROUGH THE PLOT CARRYINGSEWAGE LEADING TO BREEDING OF MOSQUITOES.

I s -s ti$ E

"gi.

- EXHIBIT MFNMP

EXHIBIT 8 MCBM STAFF SPRAYING ANTI--MALARIAL PESTICIDE

EXHIBIT 9: RESIDENTS CROSS TRACKS TO ACCESS TICKET WINDOW ONWEST SIDE OF KANJURMARG STATION

,< ' -~~~~~~~~~~~~~I

A _A

EXHIBIT 10 RESIDENTS QUEUE UP FOR WATER, WHICH [S SCARCE

U ss, - -., ,

EXH03T 2 C N LL DU AN UNU

EXHIBIT 11 WATER COLLECTED AT LOWER LEVELNOTE THE SEWAGE DRAIN FLOWING ADJACENT TO ITIN THE BACKGROUND

', *

.i...1 4'

EXII2COMNTIE TOTLL DEUC AM) UNUSABLE.

v,ti; * -b S,l-bese~~*

EXHIBIT13 INTERNAL STORM WATER DRAIN CARRY SULLAGE ANDCHOKED WITH GARBAGE

_h|z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~' S i,....

o I to/X _~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~to

EXH3T14 SOLID WAE M D BY R* .xS

~~-, -- - , ?fe:

__, .

EXHIBIT14 SOLID WASTE MANAGED BY RESIDENTS

i-itllel_. _<__O t-I!3g -1 i It

9k-~~~~~ '"V -l

# A,,,,,, # r;,, * 'a-. 'A l

L>- -0

_- ' -' :- J

EXHIBIT 15 RESIDENTS CARRY GARBAGE IN CARTS TO DISPOSAL POINT

EXHIBIT16: PLOT 121 USED FOR DU)MPING GARBAGE BY RESIDENTSON ITS PERIPHE'R

an~~~-

-~~~ :U

EXHIBIT 17 MOSQUlITO BREEDING IN THE NALLAH PASSING THROUGHTHE PLOT

U.. K; t,,

EXHIBIT 18 COMMUNITY TOILET CONSTRUCTION ATTEMNTED BYRESIDENTS OF PLOT 122 WORK STOPPED DUE TOLITIGATION

E -,' <

EXHIBITI9: NARROW PASSAGE AMONG MULTI-STOREYED TRANSITHOUSES

'FA~~~~~~~~~t

EXMHBIT20 POLICE CHOWKY PROVIDED IN THE COMPLEX

CHAPTER 3

BASELINE ENVIRONMENT

CHAPTER 3 BASELINE ENVIRONMENT

3.1 The PAH's have been earlier residing in unorganized housing or slums before

being shifted to transit camps at Kanjurmarg. Being unorganized, the state of

infrastructural facilities in the slums was poor and substandard. Electricity and

water supply was mostly tapped illegally. The service charges for facilities

were mostly paid to the slumlords in the area. The law and order situation in

the slums was also grim. The sanitary conditions were very poor. Solid waste

was dumped haphazardly in the vicinity.

3.2 The present condition of the PAH in transit camp is better than that when they

resided in the slums along railway tracks. However, there is scope for further

improvement before they are shifted to Permanent Resettlement Housing.

3.3 The living conditions, though better than the slums from which they have been

shifted, are far from satisfactory. The services at the Transit Camps are

managed by Residents' Committee established through SPARC.

CHAPTER 4

IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTALIMPACTS

CHAPTER 4 IDENTIFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS

The following environmental impacts are identified at the transit camp site due to the

present conditions (Phase I) and during construction of permanent building at the site

(Phase - II).

4.1 Impacts identified due to present conditions at the transit camp are based on

minutes of the meeting attached as Annexure 4.1.

1) Water Supply and Quality:

Municipal water supply is,available at Site, but it is grossly inadequate

for the population it serves. The supply pressure is very low and at

times there are fights at t4he water supply point which is common to

many. Most PAH's get water from the slums across the road by paying

Rs.100/- per month to the slum dwellers. Duration of water supply is

for 12 hours but the pressure is very low.

They have not received any bills for water supply. There is a common

tap for each group of 15 to 20 PAH's.

No water supply meters are provided.

2) Sewerage and Sewage Disposal

Five blocks of common toilets, each of 12 units is provided. 6 males +

6 females toilets are provided. Toilets are in very poor condition and

are grossly overloaded. They get choked frequently.

The outlet of toilets overflows into the nallah causing severe mosquito

nuisances.-

Also in monsoon, most toilets get a back flow from the nallah.

Kitchen/bath drainage overflows into common drain outside the house.

These drains also get choked but are cleaned by the residents to

maintain flow in them.

3) Solid Wastes Disposal

Each society has appointed a person to clean open spaces and dispose

garbage collected from individual tenements to the garbage disposal

bin situated within the Complex.

MCBM garbage staff collects the garbage form the bins on alternate

days. At times, if they do not come, the garbage piles up causing

nuisance leading to rodent odour and mosquitoes.

Most of the residents around Plot No. CTS 122 throw their garbage in

Plot No. CTS 122 as it is unoccupied.

4) Storm Water Disposal

The plot is low lying and floods up during monsoon.

Internal storm water drains are filled with garbage.

Residents usually clean them before monsoon. Residents have resolved

the flooding problem by getting out the storm water into the

neighbouring plot by puncturing the Compound Wall.

Proper covered storm water drains will be needed to be provided in the

permanent housing complex in the plot.

5) Compound Wall

Compound Wall is there only on one side. Fence is broken at most

places giving unlimited access to vandals from outside. There is no

security in the Complex.

7) Electricity

Common electric meter is provided for each society. Bills are

distributed among residents. About Rs.100/-per tenant is paid towards

electricity through NGO, M/s SPARC. However, it would be

preferable to have individual meters in permanent houses. Since some

residents do not pay on time it results in delays and hardships.

4.2 Identified During Construction - Phase II

The major activities associated with the construction of the twenty-three

buildings at the Kanjurmarg resettlement site are:

a) Piling for foundations

b) Preparing Form work

c) Cutting, bending and fixing re-inforcement

d) Casting concrete for slabs, columns and beams.

e) Erecting Internal Walls: Flooring

f) Fixing doors and windows, panels and frames.

g) Fixing Plumbing Lines.

h) Electrification including Lifts.

i) External and Internal Painting.

j) Internal Roads, Water Supply and Sewerage Lines.

k) Storm Water Drains and Compound Wall.

1) Other necessary Civil, Electrical and Mechanical Works.

In the process of carrying out the above construction activities, there are likely

to be the following negative environmental impacts on

Air-quality

Noise.

Vibrations.

Water Quality

Soil contamination

Vegetation

Excess excavated earth

Health and Safety of Contract Workers

These impacts would affect the surrounding habitation and the construction workers

working within the Plot.

For the following environmental parameters, the negative impacts expected are

enlisted below each of them.

1. Air-Quality

i) Construction activities will increase dust specifically, due to

transportation of materials loading, unloading of cement, excavated

earth, gravel, sand, etc.

ii) The construction machinery such as excavators, rollers, mixers,

vibrators, dewatering pumps are likely to emit fumes of oxides of

nitrogen and sulphur dioxide and soot.

2. Noise Nuisance

i) The noise levels are likely to increase during construction due to

operation of machinery, banging of hammers, shouting of labourers,

noise of vibrators, openings of form work, dropping of material from a

height, etc. is likely to affect people in the surrounding areas as well as

construction labourers / supervision engineering staff at Site.

However, there is already some background noise due to the flow of

traffic along the road, bridge and movement of local trains along the

tracks.

3. Vibrations

i) In case, blasting activity is envisaged in the area, it will cause an

impact on the structures in the surrounding area. Also, vibrations due

to driving of piles for foundation and operating piling equipment will

have an impact on neighbouring structures with a possibility of

damaging them.

4) Water Quality

i) Wastewater emanating from the Site, especially from sand washing,

washing of equipment, labour camps, cooking, washing of utensils,

dumping of uneaten food, washing toilets, office establishment toilets,

etc. is likely to further deteriorate water quality in the adjoining natural

water course.

5. Soil Contamination

i) The soil in the existing Plot is likely to get contaminated due to soil

waste generation leachates, dumping of garbage, construction debris,

construction chemicals and mineral oil leaking/drained from

construction machinery. Leachates from these waters are likely to

pollute the soil as well as ground water source within the Plot and in

the vicinity.

6. Vegetation

i) There are some shrubs and trees present at this Site. These trees may

have to be felled to accommodate the various buildings and services

within the Plot.

7. Excess Excavation

i) The Plot is quite flat. However, excess excavated material may arise

due to excavation from foundations. The same may be required to be

disposed properly.

8. Health and Safety of Construction Workers

i) The impacts will be mostly related to environmental health and safety

precautions during construction. Better control will result in less

sickness and prevention of accidents at the Site.

ANNEXURE 4.1

MINUTES OF THE MEETING WITH THE PAH'S

MINUTES OF MEETING HELD AT KANJURMARG ON 09.01.2002

PARTICIPANTS:

SOCIETY MEMBERS ECON

Mr. S. H. MANSURI Mr. GANESH K.

Mrs. SUSHEELA NARAYAN SHETITY

Mr. SRIDHAR CHALKE

POINTS LISTED:

1. The water supply by the BMC to the society is for duration of 12.0 hrs,which is not adequate due to low pressure and low quantity of water.

2. There is no provision of separate water supply line for each Tenement.

3. There is a common water supply tap for about 10-15 Tenements due towhich there are lots of quarrels during the supply hours.

4. Around 200 - 250 Tenements get water for their daily purpose from thenearby slums and they pay around Rs. 100/- per month to the nearbyslums.

5. They claim the quality of water is as normal municipal water quality.

6. There are no separate electricity meters for each Tenement. There is onlyone common meter for the entire society. Each Tenement is paying a sumof Rs. 100/- per month as their share for paying the monthly electric bill ofMSEB.

7. The society collects a proportional share amount from the Residents anddeposits it with SPARC (NGO) and SPARC arranges to pay the bills toMSEB.

8. The monthly collection of the entire society is around Rs. 80,000/- toRs. 90,000/-.

9. 60% of the Tenements pay their share of bills in time but 40% of theTenements delay their payment due to which the society faces difficulty inpaying the MSEB bills within the due date.

10. The rates charged per unit of electricity applied by the MSEB are normalconsumer rates, but the society members feel the rates are very high.

11. The Complex does not have a proper Internal Approach Road. A narrowfilled up mud road with Transit Houses on both sides is the only internalaccess within the Complex, because of which it becomes difficult to theapproach within the Transit Houses for emergency services likeambulance, fire engine, trucks, etc.

12. During monsoon in the year 2000 there was flooding in the Complex up tothree feet height,-but in 2001 there was nQ flooding as they have mademany outlets connecting to the BMC drain at the periphery of the society.

13. The Storm Water Drains are choked with garbage and debris.

14. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Ltd. has provided telephone cables withinthe society and around 50-70 Tenements have private phones.

15. Around 6-7 Public Telephones Points are available within the society foremergency purpose.

16. There is no Compound Wall for the Complex. The only barrier betweenthe Complex and adjacent plot is a wire fencing, which is not in goodshape.

17. Non-existence of compound wall does not bother the Residents.

18. There is no provision of gas pipeline for cooking in the society. But thereis an easy availability of gas cylinders for cooking. Around 200 - 250Tenements use gas cylinders for cooking and remaining Tenements areusing kerosene stoves for cooking.

19. The Government subsidy items like kerosene, food grains, etc. areavailable within the society, as the society members have formed, aGovernment approved Mahila Milan Rationing Shop.

20. There is no closed drainage system for the society.

21. The outlets from all the Transit Houses in a row are connected to acommon sewer open outside the houses.

22. The society has five sets of toilets at five different locations within thesociety. Each toilet is of 12.0 seater, 6.0 for male and 6.0 for female.

23. There are 850 PAH's in the society. The population is around 4500 -6000. The available toilet is only 60 nos. for male and female, due towhich the Tenants have to wait in queue for toilet purpose and that leads towastage of time.

24. The drainage lines are working, but the society cleans the drainage on afrequent basis people are appointed for cleaning.

25. The drainage lines from the row houses are connected to main opendrainage line of BMC, which is passing within the centre of societypremises. The BMC's main drainage lines were partly filled with garbageand debris.

26. The sewerage drain is a open drain due to which the Tenants parallel to theopen drain face the consequences of bad smell, mosquito, etc.

27. During monsoon the BMC's main drainage line flows back into thesociety.

28. The BMC nallah passes within the society premises causing mosquitonuisance.

29. The Residents have informed the BMC regarding the problem faced due tomosquito but no action has been taken.

30. BMC's Malarial Department Staff do not come to spray insecticide.

31. Doctors are not available within the society for emergency purpose. Thenearest Government Hospital is Mahatma Phule Hospital, which is about 5- 6 kms from the society, but private clinics are available at a distance ofaround 1.0 km from the society.

32. Persons are appointed to collect waste garbage from the Tenements and todump the collected garbage at the end of the society premises from wherethe BMC's garbage collection department collects on every alternate day.

33. Various mode of transport are easily available outside the society.

34. The nearest railway station is Kanjurmarg Railway Station, which is about150 - 200 mts from the Site.

35. The society is located at the east side and the ticket counter for railwaytickets is at the west side. There is no connecting walkway bridge betweenthe two sides due to which people cross the railway tracks to get railwaytickets or to go to the west side, because of which accidents occurfrequently.

36. There is a vacant plot {plot no. (S.T. 122) within the society premises.Most of the Residents adjacent to this plot dump the garbage in this plot.

37. Some of the PAH's have sold their transit houses; some of them have leftfor living on rental basis outside. The lists of those PAH's were handedover to the concerned authorities by the society members but no action wastaken.

CHAPTER 5

COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENTALMANAGEMENT PLAN

CHAPTER 5 COMMUNITY ENVIRONMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN

5.1 Objectives:

The objective of the CEMP is to improve the quality of life of the Project

Affected Households by providing access to better urban infrastructural

services at the Transit Camp Site at Kanjurmarg through community

participation and lower the environmental health risks to the community.

CEMP is divided into two phases of implementation i.e. Phase - I involves

addressing environmental impacts arising out of existing conditions at the

Transit Camp Site and Phase - II involves mitigating environmental impacts

during construction of Permanent housing at the resettlement site.

5.2 Community Environmental Management Plan - Phase - I

About 850 families residing in the Kanjurmarg Resettlement Site and are

facing various hardships due to poor environmental conditions which have

been identified in Article 4.1 and now mitigatory actions for each of them

addressed in Annexure 5.1. This Annexure also gives the responsible agency,

time-frame and the costs of implementation. The cost for implementation for

CEMP - Phase I - improving existing conditions is Rs. 13,40,000/-.

5.3 Community Environmental Management Plan (CEMP) - Phase II

MMRDA proposes to build Permanent Resettlement Houses at the same Site,

where 850 transits houses exist. To start with, construction will be started in

the open area at the southeast corner of the Plot. PAH's will be shifted phase-

wise and empty transit houses will be cleared to create more space eventually

develop the entire Plot as a Permanent Resettlement Site. There will be certain

impacts due to construction activity on the Residents. The impacts on

Residents due to construction activity have been addressed issue-wise in

Annexure 5.1 as phase II of this CEMP.

MMRDA will ensure that these recommended mitigatory actions clearly

specified in the tender documents for construction of permanent buildings at

this Site.

This Annexure 5.1 alongwith issue-wise specific mitigatory actions, also

identifies with the agency responsible for its implementation. The costs for

CEMP - Phase II during construction are not included here as they are deemed

to be included in the cost for construction contracts for permanent buildings.

5.4 CEMP Costs:

The costs for CEMP - Phase I (existing conditions in the Transit Camp) are

Rs.13,40,000/- costs for Phase - II (during construction of Permanent

Housing) will be a part of the contract costs for Permanent Housing.

5.5 Public Consultation:

Training And Awareness / Participation Programme:

The public awareness, training participation & consultation process will be

made an integral part of the project implementation during both the phases of

the CEMP.

The EMC are to be activated immediately through the local NGO's. EMC's

will be involved in all the decision making process on environmental issues

during both the phases.

Interaction with PAH's through EMC members will be initiated immediately

and carried out frequently through meetings, seminar and interactive training

workshops. The minutes of such meetings will be properly documented &

followed up for implementation by the MMRDA / NGO's.

After implementation of the Project Permanent Housing at the Site, the EMC's

will be involved in the operation & maintenance of the various infrastructural

services of the permanent housing. Later the EMC's will also be interacting

with co-operative housing societies on a regular basis. Their services will be

utilized in spreading environmental awareness in the surrounding area and

educating the PAH's regarding the importance of good habits and maintenance

of clear surroundings.

Other useful information for EMC's / Residents is presented as:

Annexure 5.2 - A & B List of Do's and Don'ts in simple language to be

circulated amongst EMC's / Inhabitants at the

Resettlement Site.

Annexure 5.3 - A Translation of "synopsis" of Annexure 5.2 in local language.

5.6 Monitoring Indicators For Effective Implementation Of CEMP:

MMRDA shall monitor the effective implementation of the CEMP in both the

phases as per the monitoring indicators suggested in Annexure 5.4. Annexure

5.4 gives a suggested format for issue-wise monitoring the implementation of

the CEMP for both the phases by MMRDA / PMC's as appropriate for CEMP

- Phase II - monitoring the PMC's will have inputs from environmental

experts in their team. Corrective measures will be taken, wherever necessary,

to ensure that good housekeeping practices and local laws for environmental

parameters will be complied with.

5.7 Interagency Co-Ordination:

As can be seen, a number of agencies are to be involved during both the

phases of CEMP implementation. MMRDA should ensure close co-ordination

between various agencies. Information technology networking by computer

tools should be used by MMRDA to maintain this close co-ordination, to be

backed u'p by regular contact at various levels.

5.8 Conclusions:

PAH's who were residing in slums are now living in Transit Camps. To

improve their social and environmental status, CEMP recommended for

Phase I and II needs to be implemented effectively. A budget for CEMP costs

for Phase - I Rs. 13,40,000/- are included in Annexure 5.1.

The EMC's need to be activated immediately through the local NGO's. An

awareness, educational training and participation programme needs to be

initiated immediately and continued to merge with post implementation

CEMP of permanent buildings at the Site. Monitoring indicators for CEMP

implementation are also recommended in Annexure 5.4 for both the phases.

The Housing Complex will have PAH's from other projects and commercial

buyers as well. Inter agency co-ordination to establish proper Apex body,

individual societies and EMC's will have to be undertaken. The local NGO

will play a very important role of bridging the social, economic and cultural

divergence.

The successful implementations of both the phases CEMP will improve the

environmental conditions of Transit Camp residents and construction workers.

ANNEXURE 5.1

KANJURMARG TRANSIT CAMP SITE CEMPPHASE - I (EXISTING CONDITIONS)

ANNEXURE S.1 KANJURMARO TRANSiT RESErTLEMENT SITE - PHASE I (EXISTING CONDITIONS}PARAMETERS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RECOMMENDED MITIGATORY AGENCY *TIME- COST INENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS IDENTIFIED ACTIONS RESPONSIBLE FOR FRAME RUPEES

ASSESSMENT IMPLEMENTATION

URBAN

INFRASTRUCTURAL

SERVICES

WATER SUPPLY Municipal water supply Is available Stop Illegal connectlon of water. NGO /SOCIETY I EMC/ I 50,000.00at Site but It Is grossly Inadequte for Increase supply to ensure at least WARD OFFICE /

the population It serves. The supply 45 Ipcd is available to Transit Camp MMRDApressure Is very low and at times dwellors.

there are fights at the water supply Divert water supply lines to eliminate I 100,000.00point which is common to many. Most contact with sewage.

PAH's get water from the slums Test water quality periodically. l 20,000.00across the road by paying Rs. 100/- Replace water supply line with largerper month to the slum dwellers. Duration capacity tapping.

of water supply Is for 12 hours but the

pressure Is very low.

They have not received any bills for

water supply.

There Is a common tap for each group of

15 to 20 PAHs.

No water supply meters are provided.

2 SEWERAGE I AND SEWAGE Five blocks of common toilets, each of Prevent dumping of solid waste in NGOCISOCIETY I EMC IDISPOSAL 12 units is provided. 6 males + 6 female sewage chambers. WARD OFFICE /

toilets are provided. Toilets are In very Awareness programme to be MMRDA I 20,000.00poor condition and are grossly over- implemented.

loaded. They get choked frequently. Prevent chokage of sewers. i 20,000.00The outlet of toilets overflows Into the Clean the disposal channel of silt to I 50,000.00

^ I IMMEDIATE 0 -6 MONTHS

*- MMRDA will got execut-d through Railways who aro also part of MUTP.

ANNEXURE 5.11 KANJUR1ARG TRANSIT RESErTLEMENT SITE - PHASE I (EXISTING CONDITIONS)PARAMETERS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL, RECOMMENDED MITIGATORY AGENCY *TIME- COST INENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS IDENTIFIED ACTIONS RESPONSIBLE FOR FRAME RUPEES


nallah causing severe mosquito nuisance. prevent choking up of sewage InAlso In monsoon, most toilets get a back drains.flow from the nallah. Proper sewage disposal to beKitchen/bath drainage overflows Into planned for the permanent housing.common drain outside the house. Thesedrains also get choked but are cleaned bythe residents to maintain the flow In them.

3 SOLID WASTES DISPOSAL Each society has appointed a person to Provide garbage collection system NGO I MMRDA l 20,000.00clean open spaces and dispose garbage at site. (10 bins @collected from Individual tenement to the Society to manage open space and Rs.2000/- I bin)garbage disposal bin situated within the stop people from dumping garbageComplex. from window. NGO i EMC / MMRDA IMCBM garbage staff collects the garbage Awareness and educationfrom the bins on alternate days. At times, programme to be conducted.If they do not come the garbage plies upcausing nuisance leading to rodent odourand mosquitoes.Most of the residents around Plot No.CTS 122 threw their garbage in PlotCTS 122 as it Is unoccupied.

4 STORM WATER DISPOSAL The plot Is low lying and floods up during Awareness to be improved by for NGO / SOCIETY / EMC / 20,000.00monsoon. Internal storm water drains are keeping Storm Water Drains clean. MMRDAflled with garbage. Residents usually clean Residents should actively guardthem before monsoon. Residents have against dumping of anything in Stormwresolved the flooding problem by getting Water Drains.out the storm water into the neighbouring Desilting of nailah to be undertaken a l 20,000.00plot by puncturing the Compound Wall. to improve carrying capacity of the

I IMMEDIATE 0 - 6 MONTHS

ANNEXURE 5.1 KANJUR1ARC TRANSIT RESErTLEMENT SITE - PHASE I (EXISTING CONDITIONS)PARAMETERS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RECOMMENDED MITIGATORY AGENCY TIME- COST INENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS IDENTIFIED ACTIONS RESPONSIBLE FOR FRAME RUPEES


Proper covered storm water drains will be natural drain.needed to be provided In the permanent Training of nallah will also improve l 20,000.00housing complex in the plot. hydraulic properties to carry storm

water I sewage.

5 COMPOUND WALL Compound Wall Is there only on one side. Complete Compound Wall on all sides. MHADA / NGO/EMC l 200,000.00Fence Is broken at most places giving /MMRDA (2000sqm@

unlimited access to vandals from outside. Provide basic security for the Rs1O0/- / sqm)There is no security in the Complex. Complex once it is conipleted.

6 ELECTRICITY Common electric meter for each society. Society I EMC will require to prevent BSES/NGO / EMC I 50,000.00Bills are distributed among residents. About misuse of electricity and manageRs.100/- per tenant Is paid towards common bills.electricity through NGO, M/s SPARC. Provision of individual meters to be I 50,000.00However, It would be preferable to have Included In the Contract for construc-Individual meters In permanent houses. tion of buildings.Since some residents do not pay on time Itresults In delay and hardships.

11 WORKMANSHIP The workmanship of transit building Is very Temporary repairs to be undertaken SOCIETY/NGO/MMRDA I 2,00,000/-poor. Slightest wind blows away the AC wherever necessary. (4000sqm@sheet roof. The quality of asbestos sheet Is Rs.50I-Isqm)poor and the roof has to be protected byLDPE sheet every monsoon to prevent Shift PAH's Internally to empty SOCIETY/NGO I 5,00,000/-leakages In the transit houses during houses and demolish damaged

I IMMEDIATE 0 . 6 MONTHS

ANNEXURE 5.1 KANJURIARG TRANSIT RESETTLEMENT SITE - PHASE I (EXISTING CONDITIONS)PARAMETERS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RECOMMENDED MITIGATORY AGENCY TIME- COST INENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS IDENTIFIED ACTIONS RESPONSIBLE FOR FRAME RUPEES


monsoon. There are cracks In walls and houses.also In the PCC flooring. Plaster Is also MMRDA to Include clause on NGO/EMC/MMRDA Imissing In some rooms and bare bricks are workmanship In Contract for const-vIsible. ruction of new buildings

TOTAL CEMP COST 13,40,000/-

IMMEDIATE 0 - 6 MONTHS

ANNEXURE 5.1

KANJURMARG TRANSIT CAMP SITE CEMP-PHASE II - DURING CONSTRUCTION

ANNEXURE 5.1 KANJURMARG TRANSIT CAMP SITE CEMP - PHASE II - DURING CONSTRUCTIONPARAMETERS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS IDENTIFIED RECOMMENDED AGENCY *TIME'

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MITIGATORY ACTIONS RESPOI SIBLE FRAMEIMPLEMENTAT- SUPER-

ION VISION

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUESLIKELY TO HAVE IMPACT DURINGCONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT

HOUSING (BASED ON EXPERIENCEOTHER SITES) ON THE RESIDENTSAT KANJURMARO RESETTLEMENT

SITEAIR QUALITY Construction activities will Increase dust Use Ready Mix Concrete/Pre-fab members for CONTRACTORS * PMC/MMRDA C

specifically, due to transportation of materials concrete structures to the extent possible.loading, unloading of cement, excavated earth, All trucks/dumpers carrying constructiongravel, sand etc. The construction machinery materials that are likely to gonerate dustsuch as excavators, rollers, mixers, vibrators, will be covered during transportation.dewatering pumps are likely to emit fumes of All construction roads will be watered tooxides of nitrogen and sulphur dioxide. keep dust under control.

Trucks/dumpers with a valid PUC will be usedfor the Project.

2 NOISE- NUISANCE The noise levels are likely to Increase during No noise generating activities shall beconstruction due to operatlon of machinery, carried out during the night (10p.m.- 6a.m.).banging of hammers, shouting by labourers, Any construction machinery generating CONTRACTORS PMC/MMRDA Cnoise of vibrators, openings of form work, excessive noise will be either enclosed, ordropping of material from a height, etc. is likely other physical precautionsto affect people in the surrounding areas as such as provisions of noise barriers will bewell as construction labourers/supervision taken.

* COSTS UNDER THESE HEADS ARE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT HOUSING.* I IMMEDIATE - - 6 MONTHS

MT MID-TERM - 6 MONTHS - 2 YEARSLT LONG-TERM - 2 YEARS -5 YEARSC CONTINUOUS

ANNEXURE 5.1 KANJURMARG TRANSIT CAMP SITE CEMP - PHASE II - DURING CONSTRUCTIONPARAMETERS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS IDENTIFIED RECOMMENDED AGENCY TTIME-ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MITIGATORY ACTIONS RESPONSIBLE FRAME

IMPLEMENTAT- SUPER-_____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ _____ IO N V ISIO N

engineering staff at Site.However, there Is already some background Earmuffs/ear guards shall be provided innoise due to the flow of traffic along the addition to hardhats for all constructionJogeshwari Vikhroli Link Road. workers on higher levels of noise while

working in the vicinity of noise generatingmachine.

3 VIBRATIONS In Case, blasting activity Is envisaged In the All precautions to be taken during blasting CONTRACTORS P FMC/MMRDA Carea It will cause an Impact on the structures and piling operations to prevent Impact ofIn the surrounding area. Also, vibrations due to vibration on structures in the surrroundingdriving of piles for foundation and operating areas.piling equipment will have an Impact onneighbouring structures.

4 WATER QUALITY Waste water emanating from the site especially Wherever necessary, the wastewater CONTRACTORS PMCIMMRDA Cfrom sand washing, washing of equipment, generated from sand washing plant will belabour camps, cooking, washing of utensils, pre-settled prior to disposal or possiblydumping of uneaten food washing toilets, office recycled after settling to conserve waterestablishment toilets, etc Is likely to further where possible.deteriorate water quality in the adjoining Waste water generated from labour camps,natural water course. offices, canteens etc. shall be properly

treated by construction of temporary SepticTanks prior to Its disposal or discharge intothe surrounding water bodies.Oil spillage will be prevented by providingsplash trays below equipment, periodicinspection of equipment, and timely replace-ment, and timely replacement of oil seals,controlled lubrication to prevent filling up ofexcess oil will be done. Oil shall be recovered

by collection in large drums and sold tovendors for recycling rather than indiscrimin-ately dumping it in the natural drain, which is

a normal practice.COSTS UNDER THESE HEADS ARE TO HE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT HOUSING.

I IMMEDIATE 0 0.6 MONTHSMT MIID-TtRM 0 MONTh" a? YEARiLT LONG-TERM . 2 YEARS . 5 YEARSC~ rrON1iNSIlIP5

ANNEXURE 5.1 KANJURMARG TRANSIT CAMP SITE CEMP - PHASE Il --DURING CONSTRUCTIONPARAMETERS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS IDENTIFIED RECOMMENDED AGENCY *TIME-

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MITIGATORY ACTIONS RESPON IBLE FRAMEIMPLEMENTAT- SUPER-

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ IONI OVV ISI O

5 SOIL CONTAMINATION The soil in the existing plot is likely to get Any type of soil contamination will becontaminated due to soil waste generation prevented by not allowing any leachatesleachates, dumping of garbage, construction debris (either generated from garbage disposal,

chemicals, and mineral oil leaking/drained from fertilizer, run off etc.) seeping into the soil.construction machinery. Leachates from these Efficiently manage garbage and solid waste CONTRACTORS^* PMC/MMRDA Cwaters are likely to pollute the soil as well as generated from the development, Its handlingground water source within the plot and in the and disposal.vicinity.

6 VEGETATION Trees on the selected Resettlement Site may In case some trees are to be felled, properhave to be felled. permission of Tree Authority will be obtained.

Any other norms like transplantationsuggested by Tree Authority will be adhered to.In case it Is Inevitable, proper rehabilitation CONTRACTORS PMC/MMRDA Cmeasures will be taken. If some trees are cut,they will be transplanted If possible orcompensatory plantation of three trees forevery tree cut shall be carried out.

7 EXCESS EXCAVATION Undulations arising out of excess excavated As far as possible, all cut and fill to be CONTRACTORS * PMCIMMRDA Cmaterial and debris from the construction Site. balanced at the Site.

Excess earth to be filled in plinth.Excess earth to be disposed as per local laws.

8 HEALTH AND SAFETY OF Environmental health of labourors. Construction of labour camps with proper CONTRACTORS * PMC/MMRDA CCONSTRUCTION WORKERS Accidents during working. facilities for water supply, sanitation, drainage

and solid waste disposal according to contractconditions. After construction, safety practices CONTRACTORS ** PMC/MMRDA Clike ear-plugs wearing helmets, safety lines,goggles, safety first-aid shoes, sign posts,barricading excavations, kits, electrical safetynorms, etc. should be adopted at the Site.

COSTS UNDER THESE HEADS ARE TO BE INCLUDED IN THE CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENT HOUSING.* I IMMEDIATE - 0 - 6 MONTHS

MT MID-TERM *6 MONTHS -2 YEARSLT LONG-TERM * 2 YEARS - 5 YEARSC CONTINUOUS

ANNEXURE 5.2 A

DO'S AND DONT'S TO BE CIRCULATEDAMONGST EMC

4NNEXURE 5.2 A - DO'S / DON'TS TO BE CIRCULATED AMONGST EMC

(Based on our experience of similar projects for Resettlement Sites)

I. Water Supply Systems:

1. Get both underground and overhead tanks cleaned and inspected every

year.

2. Suction Pump shall be protected and lubricated regularly. Any defects

noted during operation shall be promptly reported.

3. Any signs of leakage observed in the pipes shall be promptly attended

to.

4. Overhead Tanks cover will be locked and overflow prevented.

Periodic cleaning shall be undertaken to prevent development of

unhygienic/unhealthy conditions.

II. Sanitation:

1. Sewer chamber cover is to be protected and unauthorized opening and

removal shall be prevented.

2. Sewer lines shall be maintained with the help of the local ward office

of Municipal Corporation.

3. Vent pipes must be maintained clean and protected from birds, which

make nests in the cowl.

III. Solid Waste:

1. Garbage shall be collected in each household and transferred to the

bins provided below each building.

2. The EMC will arrange to collect garbage from every building and

dispose it to a pre-identified Municipal garbage collection pick point.

3. Uncollected garbage shall promptly be reported to the concerned

authority.

4. Shop owners and hotels will not be allowed to dump their garbage in

the domestic garbage collection point.

IV. Storm Water Drain:

1. It is important to ensure that the sweeper sweeping the pathway does

not sweep leaves/debris in the Storm Water Drain.

2. The Storm Water Drain shall be checked and cleaned prior to monsoon

to prevent flooding.

3. There should not be any water/sewage flowing in the Storm Water

Drain in dry season. If some person has made an illegal connection it

should be promptly reported and diverted to the sewers.

4. Rainwater downtakes at the terrace levels shall be checked and cleaned

prior to the monsoon to prevent accuinulation of rainwater in the

terrace.

V. Street Lights:

1. The Street Lighting shall be protected from unauthorized

tampering/tapping by the residents and outsiders.

2. Fused bulbs shall be promptly replaced by reporting to the

maintenance staff.

3. Street Lights shall be switched off at sunrise to prevent wastage of

power.

VI. Green Areas, Garden And Trees:

1. Leaves shall be removed from the area.

2. Plucking of leaves/flowers shall be controlled and discouraged.

3. The garden shall be protected from outside encroachers and anti-social

elements.

ANNEXURE 5.2 B

DO'S AND DONT'S TO BE CIRCULATEDAMONGST INHABITANTS

4,NNEXURE 5.2 B DO'S / DON'TS TO BE CIRCULATED AMONGST

INHABITANTS

(Based on our experience of similar projects for Resettlement Sites)

I. Water Supply Systems:

1. Keep area surrounding your water tank clean.

2 Keep water tank covers locked and do not allow people to dip or take

water from the underground water tank.

II. Sanitation:

1. Toilets are to be used and maintained properly.

2. No other wastes shall be disposed in the toilet.

3. Garbage and debris shall not be allowed to enter the sewage chamber.

4 Water seal in the W.C. shall be maintained.

5. Cloth rags, broken glass, brooms etc. shall not be put into the toilets.

6. In case of chokage a licensed plumber or Municipal Authority shall be

intimated to attend to the problems.

III. Solid Waste:

1. Garbage shall not be thrown in open spaces, below the staircase or out

of the kitchen window.

2. If possible, Residents will segregate organic/inorganic the garbage

prior to its disposal.

3. Animals shall not be allowed to enter the garbage bins in the building.

4. Garbage shall not be dumped into the Storm Water Drain or Sewers.

IV. Green Areas, Garden And Trees:

1. Garden must be kept clean and no litter shall be thrown in the area.

2. Garden shall be protected from stray cattle or animals.

3. Cutting of trees shall be strongly resented and immediately reported to

the concerned authorities.

ANNEXURE 5.3

A TRANSLATION OF "SYNOPSIS" OFANNEXURE 5.2 A AND 5.2 B IN LOCAL

LANGUAGE

q ) ~~~~~Q41AC 1OU 1 91

9 )TM-q NUrqlM CQ SMzt TpMR qNfl. rme 1T,-U}l

qfF IWM ,51D q[ 4l<nMqtf qq I c<lTM cWTzT- -qjt qgdf WffM

4)aC-7j MTlug-tq 3fl-q& 41Zfctl>! q\zqA M99c8 tcl1.

cOR1'41 (0T )

' qelPl"l<ul

q ) YilSae

q,- '< q1r,1XU Wt6,< Ma a 4 ~ ' ft qTR qp0 4pE WE6 FqT.

i~~Th~ui qnFM qr4 3[;Fft t;r! {t q4f -cMzrT, f1 ~ ;

) ZFIf T WA cTU T T T -th

)~~~~~q, kzfa zmtni Mia e<T fIfuTk; ch7dXEX 4T f~qtEZ hr cl

WqqTFqi)~ftizT F-7?-rafft. qp~12 uj 3TR T w z r,V

~)tT-ZTT qTURTdt WuqrT:ThT TrTrT TT;f~M~ Rm irurtrruil Clftt"-i 51TMU qTf wt~ Wr

g)h ZHNI 98FWMT HE141il d 2d l)f d WUM Cql-, fMit4 1 dIcC1< I rcl 1Z.

qTqWA qr4Tif 3IT 3r~

3T1U11P Z E,T Z4. E

UFITU f~i;xJITW T t c rm I o6;FRl E:4rTTJ

m,2mm0 Ql<lw< t4i1vmb imi<iM wmr1- cpRuqd wM

t I :Tclzl1° I MUZff: U2TlTF H 1TfT[lsu 41 fCr; ! T fUl1 ig r wTh 3 q4 .

T4 T m; TN furO claTfIl qTuUrT- qT4b g R1T1fM7, HTh IF Wgi Pr 4qllfloo419A 4E Uh MqZFcfi 3TIt.

) z@;8,T Zit w386<ctullBt

3TU1t '&lo tmi.

lW-(FT r51MV lUlX Zi WR T;TIx lffqt W7EXq --if 1-7 ;Sq e 3 ¢

c~~~~~~~~~~~~ZT ZF" ,RlU ct

ANNEXURE 5.4

MONITORING INDICATORS AT KANJURMARGTRANSIT CAMP SITE - PHASE I

(TO BE FILLED UP EVERY MONTHAND SUBMITTED TO MMRDA)

ANNEXURE 5.4 - MONITORING INDICATORS OF POST CEMP ASSESSMENT

SR. SERVICE ACTION REQUIRED AGENCY TO BE RESPONSIBLE FREQUENCY INFORMATION COMPLIANCE TONO. FOR THE TASK ON ACTION REQD. STDS./ GOOD

TAKEN HOUSEKEEPING STDS.

1 WATER SUPPLY I) Check quality of water EMC Once a year (OR)Samples to be analysed at as necessaryexternal laboratory

1) Adequacy of pressure and EMC member/ As and Whensupply hours. MCBM ward oftice. necessary

ill) Check for any Indication of EMC Once a yearleakages. Local Plumber.

2 SEWAGE AND I) Ensure that sewage flows EMC member with help of Once a yearSEPTIC TANK smoothly from all branches. local plumber.

1) Ensure all chambers are EMC members with help of Once a yearproperly covered and no local plumber.

debris Is pushed In the

chambers.

1ll) Keep vent shafts clear from EMC members with help of Once a yearbirds nests specially cowls local plumber.which get choked with leaves

and twigs collected by small

birds.


ANNEXURE 5.4 - MONITORING INDICATORS OF POST CEMP ASSESSMENTSR. SERVICE ACTION REQUIRED AGENCY TO BE RESPONSIBLE FREQUENCY INFORMATION COMPLIANCE TONO. FOR THE TASK ON ACTION REQD. STDS./ GOOD


Iv) Septic Tanks shall be cleaned EMC/ local ward office to Inspect once aonce In 4 years with the help clean Septic Tank. yearof Municipal Boozer meant for

cleaning Septic Tanks.

3 STORM WATER i) Ensure that the sweeper does Soclety/EMC Members MonthlyDRAINS not sweep leaves, debris etc.

Into the Storm Water Drain.

ii) A pre-monsoon check of all EMC members Yearly prior to rainsStormvWater Drains shall be and weekly duringperformed to ensure that there monsoon.Is no blockage In the drains.

111) All storm water down takes Society sweeper/EMC Yearly prior tofrom terraces of buildings shall member/secretary of each rains.be checked to prevent building.

accumulation of rain water in

terraces.

4 GARDEN AND i) Periodic watering of garden. Gardener under supervision Weekly with extraTREES of EMC member. precaution In

summer.


ANNEXURE 5.4 - MONITORING INDICATORS OF POST CEMP ASSESSMENTSR. SERVICE ACTION REQUIRED AGENCY TO BE RESPONSIBLE FREQUENCY INFORMATION COMPLIANCE TONO. FOR THE TASK ON ACTION REQD. STDS.1 GOOD

TAKEN HOUSEKEEPING STDS.1i) Raking of leaves. Gardener under supervision Weekly with extra

of EMC member. precaution in

monsoon.

iil) De-weeding of garden. Gardener under supervision Weekly with extra

of EMC member. precaution In

monsoon.

iv) Plantations of new saplings Gardener under supervision Weekly with extra

In pre-monsoon period. of EMC member. precaution in

monsoon.

5 SOLID WASTE AND l) Check area around garbage bin EMC MembersGARBAGE Is kept clean.

ii) Discourage direct throwing of EMC Members

garbage from houses.

ill) Encourage responsible Apex Body Annually

behavior by awarding prizes to

best kept surroundings.


ANNEXURE 5.4- MONITORING INDICATORS OF POST CEMP ASSESSMENTSR. SERVICE ACTION REQUIRED AGENCY TO BE RESPONSIBLE FREQUENCY INFORMATION COMPLIANCE TONO. FOR THE TASK ON ACTION REOD. STDS./ GOOD


lv) Ensure transfer of garbage from Society Secretary/EMC Regular checksIndividual bins to commons members to supervise the preferably everydaydisposal point by trained staff, hired staff.

v) Follow up with MCBM authorities Apex Body/EMCfor clearance of Garbage fromcollection point.

vi) Keep dogs/cattle and scavengers All society members. Red alertfrom spreading the garbage and EMCcreating ugly sights. Members

ANNEXURE 5.4

MONITORING INDICATORS AT KANJURMARGTRANSIT CAMP SITE -PHASE - II

DURING CONSTRUCTION

(TO BE SUBMITTED EVERY MONTH TO MMRDA)

ANNEXURE 54 KANJURUARG TRANSIT CAMP SITE MONITORINIG INDICATORS - PHASE 11- DURING CONSTRUCTIOIN

COMPLIANCEPARAMETERS FOR RECOMMENDED AGENCY RESPONSIBLE ACTION TAKEN TO REQUIRED STDS/

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MITIGATORY ACTIONS FOR IMPLEMENTAT- FOR SUPER GOODION VISION HOUSEKEEPING

ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES LIKELY TOHAVE IMPACT DURINO

CONSTRUCTION OF PERMANENTHOUSING (BASED ON EXPERIENCE ATOTHER SITES) ON THE RESIDENTS ATKANJURMARG RESETTLEMENT SITE

AIR QUALITY Use Ready Mix Concrete/Pre-fab members for concrete CONTRACTORS PMC / MMRDAstructures to the oxtent possible.All trucks/dumpers carrying construction materials that arelikely to generate dust will be covered during transportation.All construction roads will be watered to keep dust undercontrol.Trucks/dumpers with a valid PUC will be used for the project.

2 NOISE -NUISANCE No noise generating activities shall be carried out during the CONTRACTORS PMC / MMRDAnight (10p.m.- 6a.m.).Any construction machinery generating excessive noise willbe oIther enclosed, or other physical precautions such asprovisions of noise barriers will be taken.Earmuffs/ear guards shall be provided In addition to hardhatsfor all construction workers on higher levels of noise whileworking in the vicinity of noise generating machine.


ANNEXURE 5.4 KANJURiARG TRANSIT CAMP SITE MONITORING INDICATORS - PHASE 11- DURiNG COiSTRUCTION

_ COMPLIANCEPARAMETERS FOR RECOMMENDED AGENCY RESPONSIBLE ACTION TAKEN TO REQUIRED STDS/

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MITIGATORY ACTIONS FOR IMPLEMENTAT FORNSUPER GOOD

ION VISION HOUSEKEEPING

3 VIBRATIONS All precautions to be taken during blasting and piling CONTRACTORS PMC I MMRDAoperations to prevent Impact of vibration on structures in thesurrrounding areas.

4 WATER QUALITY Wherever necessary, the wastewater generated from sand CONTRACTORS PMC / MMRDAwashing plant will be pre-settled prior to disposal or possiblyrecycled after settling to conserve water where possible.Waste water generated from labour camps, offices, canteens,etc. shal be properiy treated by construction of temporarySeptic Tanks prior to Its disposal or discharge Into thesurrounding water bodies.

Oil spillage will be prevented by providing splash trays belowequipment, periodic Inspection of equipment, and timelyreplacement of oIl seals, controlled lubrication to preventfilling up of excess oil wil be done. Oil shall be recovered bycollection in large drums and sold to vendors for recycylingrather than indiscriminately dumping It In the natural drain,which Is a normal practice.


ANMlEXURE S.4 KAlJURlARG TRANSIT CAMP SITE MONITORING INDICATORS - PHASE 11- DURING CONSTRUCTION

COMPLIANCEPARAMETERS FOR RECOMMENDED AGENCY RESPONSIBLE ACTION TAKEN TO REQUIRED STDS/

ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT MITIGATORY ACTIONS FOR IMPLEMENTAT FOR SUPER GOODION VISION HOUSEKEEPING

5 SOIL CONTAMINATION Any type of soil contamination will be prevented by not MCBM PMC I MMRDAallowing any leachates (either generated from garbagedisposal, fertilizer, run off etc.) seeping Into the soil.Efficiently manage garbage and solid waste generated fromthe development, its handling and disposal.

6 VEGETATION In case some trees are to be felled, proper permission of MCBM PMC / MMRDATree Authority will be obtained. Any other norms like trans-plantation suggested by Tree Authority will be adhered to.

In case It Is Inevitable, proper rehabilitation measures will betaken. If some trees are cut, they will be transplanted Ifpossible or compensatory plantation of three trees forevery tree cut shall be carried out.

7 EXCESS EXCAVATION As far as possible, all cut and fill to be balanced at the Site. CONTRACTORS PMC / MMRDAExcess earth to be filled In plinth.Excess earth to be disposed as per local laws.

8 HEALTH AND SAFETY OF Construction of labour camps with proper facilities for water CONTRACTORS PMC / MMRDACONSTRUCTION WORKERS supply, sanitation, drainage and solid waste disposal

according to contract conditions.After construction, safety practices like ear-plugs wearing CONTRACTORS PMC / MMRDAhelmets, safety lines, goggles, safety shoes, sign posts,barricading excavations, first-aid kits, electrical safety normsetc. should be adopted at the Site.

Date post:	14-Mar-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	1 times
Download:	0 times

E507 URBAN TRANSPORATION PROJECT (MUTP) · 2016-07-14 · e507 volume 9 miuma metropolitan reion...

Documents