+ All Categories
Home > Business > Ead pertemuan-2

Ead pertemuan-2

Date post: 23-Jun-2015
Category:
Upload: yudha-arif-budiman
View: 89 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
31
PERTEMUAN 2 PENGEMBANGAN APLIKASI ENTERPRISE Review Arsitektur Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi
Transcript
Page 1: Ead pertemuan-2

PERTEMUAN 2PENGEMBANGAN APLIKASI ENTERPRISE

Review Arsitektur Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi

Page 2: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 3: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 4: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 5: Ead pertemuan-2

Definition

The Central Computer and Telecommunications Agency (CCTA1) of the UK Treasury denotes the following concerns of ISSP: (CCTA, 1988) Understanding the aims and objectives of the

business, Establishing the information requirements of the

business, Outlining the systems to provide the information,

and determining the role of technology in supporting the information systems,

Agreeing policies and plans to develop and implement the information systems,

Determining the role and use of resources to achieve the information systems required, and

Managing, reviewing and evolving the strategy.

Page 6: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 7: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 8: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 9: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 10: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 11: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 12: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 13: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 14: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 15: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 16: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 17: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 18: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 19: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 20: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 21: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 22: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 23: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 24: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 25: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 26: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 27: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 28: Ead pertemuan-2
Page 29: Ead pertemuan-2

Comparison of ISSP & EAP

Similarities: Basic Intent/Vision: Both are high-level approaches,

intended to realize a rational, affordable IT infrastructure that is consistent with business strategy and goals.

Both include a baseline summary of existing IT infrastructure (“where are we now?”), and an objective architecture (“where do we want to be?”).

Both establish the information requirements of the business and determine the systems required, to provide and manage the information.

Both include a fiscal dimension (however, this is much moreheavily emphasized in ISSP).

Both produce plans/architectures that are dynamic, and need to be reviewed regularly.

Both can be used by, or adapted to, any type or size of organization that uses IT.

Page 30: Ead pertemuan-2

Differences

Page 31: Ead pertemuan-2

Similarities ISSP and EAP The similarities between ISSP and EAP are

reinforced by Beveridge and Perks (2003) who state: “In many ways there is synergy between the

Enterprise IT architecture and the concepts that embodies … ISSP.

Both provide a medium- to long-term vision and framework within which the IT environment is implemented, including people, structure and technologies.

Both the ISSP and enterprise architecture provide guidelines for systems to be implemented, technologies to be considered, and

information to be gained. The ISSP, however, considers all of these aspects at a point in time and at a higher (business) level.”


Recommended