Early Intervention Service Monthly Performance Report June ... · Ilyas Najeeb...

Early Intervention Service

Monthly Performance Report

June 2014

Summary

Report extracted: End June 2014

Performance & Information Team

Joint Commissioning

Ilyas Najeeb ([email protected] ext. no: 0549)

Caroline Rixon: ([email protected] ext. no: 6564)

EI_Report_All in One_June 2014_VX 1

Summary

This report is based on data extracted from the Capita One system at end of June 2014 and is based on all referrals made to EI Service. The report summarises information about the profile of children/young people referred to the Service, the numbers and distribution of allocated cases recorded (otherwise known as involvements in One), as well as the type of activities being provided by Early Intervention Hubs.

Who do we see?• Since September 2013, 2877 new children/young people have been referred to the Early Intervention Service

o 55% of these were male and 45% were female

o 2286 (80%) were of White British background.

o 58% were SEN (Special Educational Needs). 41% of those SEN referred had BESD (Behavioural, Emotional and Social Difficulties)

o 41% were of secondary school age (11 to 15 years old).

• Since September 2013, 11814 presenting issues related to the child/young person were recorded, of which:

o Behaviour Difficulties at 1122 (9%)o Emotional Wellbeing Support at 1037 (9%) o Parenting Challenges/Diffs at 652 (6%)o Low Self Esteem at 646 (5%)

were the most common.

• 42% of allocated cases since September 2013 were referred by School, 28% were referred by Children, Education and Families and 9% were referred by Health.

How do we engage with them?

• There have been 3800 allocated cases(referrals) recorded since September 2013.

o The number of allocated cases recorded during reporting month were 290.

• Core Offers describes the types of support offered to child/young person and family. The most frequently recorded core offer was "Direct Work with Children, Young People and Families" (67%) of all generic core offers recorded.

• A total of 20713 Activity sessions have been recorded by EI hubs since September 2013. 92% were targeted sessions and 8% open access sessions. 46% of the targeted sessions recorded were engaging with individual Child/Young Person.

• Activities are linked to one or more key performance indicators (KPI). The most popular KPI addressed since September 2013 has been "Reducing Child / Young Person in Need" (50%) of all KPIs recorded, followed by "Improve Attainment Levels" at (11%) and "Improve School Attendance" at (9%).

What difference have we made since September 2013?

• The most frequently recorded outcome for closed allocated cases were "No Further Action" (28%), "Moved to TAC process" (13%) and "Reduce Child/Young Person in Need" at (10%).

• Across the county 13% of allocated cases were closed where the child/young person was moved onto a TAC process. This is particularly noticeable at West Oxfordshire hub at (26%), South West Oxfordshire hub and Littlemore hub both at (15%) of all closed allocated cases.

• 12% allocated cases were closed as the CAFs or TACs outcomes had been achieved.

• 8% allocated cases were closed because child/young person or parent/carer were not engaging. For Banbury hub in particular, 11% allocated cases were closed with such Outcomes followed by Biceter hub at 10%.

• 3% (35) allocated cases were closed as the child/young person was moved to Social Care. This is most noticeable in the three Northern area hubs.

• Note: Figures of 5 and under (in all tables) have been suppressed and are shown as an "X" due to data protection and confidentiality.


Index of Contents Page

Early Intervention Service Monthly Performance Report

Notes for the Early Intervention Service key indicators 2

County & Area Dashboards included for June 2014 4

Summary Of Allocated Cases (Referrals) and Profile of Children/Young People Referred 7

Figure 1a: Number of EI allocated cases by academic year

Figure 1b: Number of EI allocated cases by academic year and referral type

Figure 2: Children/Young People referred by Gender

Figure 3: Children/Young People referred by Ethnicity

Figure 4: Children/Young People referred by Primary Special Educational Needs

Figure 5: Children/Young People referred by Age group

Allocated Cases Opened and Number Of Children/Young People Referred since September 2013 11

Figure 6: Number of allocated cases opened & number of children/young people referred since September 2013

Figure 7: Number allocated cases opened - September 2012 to August 2013

Figure 8: Number allocated cases opened - September 2011 to August 2012

Core Offer (Status) for allocated cases 12

Figure 9: Core Offers - Since September 2013

Allocated Cases By Outcome

Figure 10: Number of closed allocated cases by Outcome - Since September 2011

Allocated Cases By Presenting Issue (Reason) 13

Figure 11: Number of presenting issues for allocated cases opened - since September 2013

Allocated Cases By Level Of Intervention and Risk of Entering Social Care 15

Figure 12: Number of generic allocated cases by level of intervention - since September 2013

Allocated Cases By Risk Of Entering Social Care

Figure 13: Number of generic allocated cases by risk of entering social care - since September 2013

Allocated Cases By Source Of Referral 16

Figure 14: Number of referrals (incl Missing Children & CAFs/TACs) by source of referral - Since September 2013

Figure 15: Number of referrals (incl Missing Children & CAFs/TACs) by source of referral - September 2012 to August 2013

Summary Of Activity Sessions By Early Intervention Hubs - since September 2013 18

Figure 16: Number of activity session by Hub and Key Performance Indicator.

Key Contacts 19

Appendix 1 Summary of CAFs and TACs from ONE system 20


Key

Ear

ly In

terv

entio

n s

trat

egic

per

form

ance

ind

icat

ors

- J

un

e 20

1411

Ind

ica

tor

Sta

tus

Ke

y:O

n, o

r be

tter

than

, ta

rget

With

in 5

% o

f tar

get

Las

t up

dat

ed:

30/0

6/20

14M

ore

than

5%

from

targ

et

CE

F

Ref

Oxf

ord

shir

eC

entr

alN

ort

her

nS

ou

ther

n

Rat

eN

o.

Sta

tus

Rat

eN

o.

Rat

eN

o.

Rat

eN

o.

322-

032.

57%

(13/

14 a

c.yr

)2%

571

(end

of t

5)

2.77

%29

21.

94%

337

1.53

%23

4

322-

047.

2% (1

3/14

ac.

Yr)

6.18

%12

53 (e

nd o

f t 5

)8.

15%

403

5.85

%69

15.

61%

562

422-

0239

nya

12.7

5ny

aX

nya

9.75

nya

X

422-

03<3

200

nya

1134

.75

nya

408

nya

490.

5ny

a64

4.25

511-

015.

0% (1

3/14

fy)

4.4%

773

5.7%

225

4.3%

311

3.7%

235

421-

01<1

50 ft

e (R

ate=

247

) (1

4/15

fy)

24.3

1e15

58.8

2e7

9.30

eX

27.4

0e6

270-

0237

0 (1

3/14

ac.

yr)

n/a

321

n/a

84n/

a16

8n/

a66

322-

063.

0% (r

ep c

ohor

t (1

3/14

ac.

Yr)

)6.

0%(fu

ll co

hort)

/ 3.

7%(r

ep c

ohor

t)23

22 /

850

(end

of t

5)

5.8%

/ 4.

0%62

0 / 2

304.

8% /

3.7%

529

/ 274

4.1%

/ 2.

1%26

4 / 9

0

322-

07a

3.3%

(rep

coh

ort

(13/

14 a

c. Y

r))

15.4

%(fu

ll co

hort)

/ 5.

3%(r

ep c

ohor

t)49

/ 8

(end

of t

5)

14.9

% /

5.4%

13 /

214

.0%

/ 8.

3%13

/ 4

7.1%

/ .0

%13

/ 2

422-

040

(13/

14 a

c.yr

)ny

any

a0.

0%0

0.0%

00.

0%0

214-

0540

00 (r

ate=

290)

(13/

14

ac.y

r)32

9.24

e38

0032

3.53

e82

540

7.35

e17

5526

3.95

e10

91

214-

0721

84 (r

ate=

160)

(13/

14

ac.y

r)13

4.44

e18

6217

252

614

5.1

750

104.

852

0

214-

0815

% (1

3/14

ac.

Yr)

15.3

%36

112

.2%

6014

.9%

157

18.8

%13

7

214-

0147

5(13

/14

ac.y

r)n/

a56

7 (6

19e)

n/a

97n/

a32

4n/

a12

3

214-

0240

0 (1

3/14

ac.

yr)

n/a

480

(524

e)n/

a11

9n/

a23

5n/

a11

4

Ear

ly In

terv

entio

n S

ervi

ce a

lso

su

pp

ort

s th

ese

targ

ets

bu

t is

no

t pri

mar

ily r

esp

on

sib

le fo

r p

erfo

rman

ce r

egar

din

g th

em13

0-01

28.3

(201

3/14

ac.

yr)

15.2

(Q3

2013

/14)

42 (Q

3 20

13/1

4)n/

an/

an/

an/

an/

an/

a

Aw

aitin

g ta

rget

n/a

27 (Q

1 20

14-1

5 fy

)n/

a17

n/a

56n/

a43

370

n/a

15 (Q

1 20

14-1

5 fy

)n/

aX

n/a

10n/

aX

60.0

%57

.14%

4 (Q

1 20

14-1

5 fy

)0%

050

%X

60%

X

211-

24N

/A13

318

4219

1.8

585

7940

973

.836

6

. Sec

onda

ry s

choo

l per

sist

ent a

bsen

ce ra

te: 1

5%+

abse

nce

- ple

ase

see

note

s

Lat

est p

erfo

rman

ce:

end

of J

un

e 20

14,

or

Ter

m 1

-5 o

f aca

dem

ic y

ear

2013

/14

Per

form

ance

Ind

icat

ors

Tar

get

. Prim

ary

scho

ol p

ersi

sten

t abs

ence

rate

: 15%

+ ab

senc

e - p

leas

e se

e no

tes

. No.

of C

AF

s as

soci

ated

with

Ear

ly In

terv

entio

n (H

ub) i

nvol

vem

ents

. Per

man

ent e

xclu

sion

s - o

vera

ll - p

leas

e se

e no

tes

. Fix

ed-te

rm e

xclu

sion

s - o

vera

ll - p

leas

e se

e no

tes

. You

ng p

eopl

e in

NE

ET:

sch

ool y

ears

12-

14

. Rat

e of

firs

t tim

e en

trant

s to

crim

inal

just

ice

per 1

00,0

00 1

0-17

yea

r old

s

. No.

of y

oung

car

ers

supp

orte

d th

roug

h E

arly

Inte

rven

tion

Hub

s

. LA

C o

vera

ll ab

senc

e (fu

ll co

hort

/ rep

orte

d co

hort)

. Loo

ked

afte

r chi

ldre

n pe

rsis

tent

abs

ence

rate

(15%

+) (f

ull c

ohor

t / re

porte

d co

hort)

. Per

man

ent e

xclu

sion

s of

look

ed a

fter c

hild

ren

(in-C

ount

y)

. Rat

e pe

r 10,

000

of e

arly

inte

rven

tion

hub

invo

lvem

ents

ope

ned

in th

e m

onth

/yea

r

. Rat

e p

er 1

0,00

0 of

chi

ldre

n w

ith a

n op

en in

volv

emen

t

. Rat

e o

f re-

refe

rral

s to

ear

ly in

terv

entio

n hu

bs

19c

Num

ber o

f you

ng p

eopl

e (r

efer

red

with

sub

stan

ce m

isus

e) s

ucce

ssfu

lly c

ompl

etin

g st

ruct

ure

inte

rven

tions

. Rat

e of

chi

ldre

n in

nee

d pe

r 10,

000

19b

Num

ber o

f you

ng p

eopl

e (r

efer

red

with

sub

stan

ce m

isus

e) s

tarti

ng a

stru

ctur

ed

inte

rven

tion

with

spe

cial

ist w

orke

rs. (

pare

ntal

sub

stan

ce m

isus

e nu

mbe

rs e

xclu

ded)

19a

Num

ber o

f you

ng p

eopl

e al

loca

ted

to a

sub

stan

ce m

isus

e w

orke

r in

a hu

b (d

urin

g cu

rren

t fin

anci

al y

ear)

. No.

of t

eam

s ar

ound

the

child

(TA

Cs)

initi

ated

. Und

er-1

8 co

ncep

tions

: rat

e pe

r 100

0


Key Early Intervention strategic performance indicators - June 2014 - Central Area

Last updated: 30/06/2014

CEF Ref

Central Area East Oxford Littlemore

Rate No. Rate No. Rate No.322-03 2.77% 292 2.21% 151 3.79% 141

322-04 8.15% 403 6.67% 208 10.67% 195

422-02 nya X nya 0 nya X

422-03 nya 408 nya 259 nya 467

511-01 5.7% 225 5.0% 117 6.9% 109

421-01 58.82e 7 0 0 0 0

270-02 n/a 84 n/a 24 n/a 60

322-06 5.8% / 4.0% 620 / 230 7.9% / 5.3% 378.5 / 138.5 4.1% / 3.0% 241.5 / 91

322-07a 14.9% / 5.4% 13 / 2 12.8% / 5.9% 5 / 1 16.7% / 5.0% 8 / 1

422-04 0.0% 00.0% 0 0.0% 0

214-05 323.53e 825 246.2e 398 457.5e 427

214-07 171.90 526 88.1 171 317.0 355

214-08 12.2% 60 14.5% 33 10.2% 27

214-01 n/a 97 n/a 50 n/a 47

214-02 n/a 119 n/a 50 n/a 69

Key Early Intervention strategic performance indicators - June 2014 - Southern Area


CEF Ref

Southern Area Abingdon Didcot

Rate No. Rate No. Rate No.322-03 1.53% 234 1.64% 114 1.44% 120

322-04 5.61% 562 6.18% 185 5.37% 377

422-02 nya X nya X nya 0

422-03 nya 644.25 nya 664 nya 481

511-01 3.7% 235 4.1% 119 3.4% 116

421-01 27.40e 6 0 0 0 0

270-02 n/a 66 n/a 43 n/a 23

322-06 4.1% / 2.1% 264 / 90 4.3% / 3.2% 133.5 / 69.5 3.8% / 1.0% 130.5 / 20.5

322-07a 7.1% / .0% 13 / 2 3.7% / .0% 1 / 10.3% / .0% 3 /

422-04 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

214-05 263.95e 1091 290.1e 573 240.0e 518

214-07 104.8387097 520 136.7 324 75.7 196

214-08 18.8% 137 8.0% 27 27.9% 110

214-01 n/a 123 n/a 79 n/a 44

214-02 n/a 114 n/a 86 n/a 2815. No. of teams around the child (TACs) initiated

Latest performance: end of June 2014, or Term 1-5 of academic year 2013/14

1. Primary school persistent absence rate: 15%+ absence - please see notes

2. Secondary school persistent absence rate: 15%+ absence - please see notes

3. Permanent exclusions - overall - please see notes

5. Young people in NEET: school years 12-14

6. Rate of first time entrants to criminal justice per 100,000 10-17 year olds

8. LAC overall absence (full cohort / reported cohort)

9. Looked after children persistent absence rate (15%+) (full cohort / reported cohort)

12. Rate per 10,000 of children with an open involvement




7. No. of young carers supported through Early Intervention Hubs


4. Fixed-term exclusions - overall - please see notes

14. No. of CAFs associated with Early Intervention (Hub) involvements

15. No. of teams around the child (TACs) initiated





Performance Indicators


10. Permanent exclusions of looked after children (in-County)

11. Rate per 10,000 of early intervention hub involvements opened in the month/year


13. Rate of re-referrals to early intervention hubs








Notes: 1)

2)3)

4)

5)

6)

7)8)

9)

No. of young carers supported (no.7) is determined from the list of presenting issues selected for EI involvement with Child/ Young Person and the involvement is still open.

Rates per 10,000 are based on 0-17 population, though interventions may involve young people older than 17Rate for re-referrals is calculated based on repeat EI Generic involvements for young people within 12 months, where the involvement did not have core offers purely of CAF/TAC and missing person involvement. This is because young people should normally only have one open involvement at any one time unless they also have a CAF/TAC involvement, missing persons involvement.Rate of children in need (no.20) is as identified by the open cases report run on Frameworki, and does not include LAC, Leaving Care & CP cases. Area is based on social care team location, and cases handled by the all-County and Disability teams are not included in the Area totals.

The current reporting year for the indicators is the current academic year. Figures for indicators 6 and 11 have been extrapolated from the data collected quarterly.

Targets are set at County level..

For indicators number 3 and 4, all figures at county, area and hub level are based on the home address postcode (if the address has no postcode or has an out of oxon postcode then the hub id is used). For indicators number 1,2, 8, 9 and 10, the county and area totals are based on the school location/postcode whereas for hub calculations are based on the home postcodes of the young people concerned. This means that the hub totals do not necessarily add up to the area totals.

Abbreviations: (e) = year to date figure is extrapolated to provide a predicted end of year rate; nya = Not yet available; n/a = Not available.

No.5: The Area and Hub NEET figures are on the same basis as the County figures, i.e. year 12-14, adjusted to allow for Not Knowns. Previously, they were for 16-18s and unadjusted.

Key Early Intervention strategic performance indicators - June 2014 - Northern Area


CEF Ref

Northern Area Banbury Bicester

Rate No. Rate No. Rate No. Rate No.322-03 1.94% 337 2.52% 131 2.01% 88 1.52% 118

322-04 5.85% 691 6.29% 228 4.46% 119 6.23% 344

422-02 nya 9.75 nya 9 nya X nya X

422-03 nya 490.5 nya 241 nya 209 nya 421

511-01 4.3% 311 5.9% 118 3.7% 71 3.6% 122

421-01 9.30e X 0 0 0 0 0 0

270-02 n/a 168 n/a 76 n/a 29 n/a 63

322-06 4.8% / 3.7% 529 / 274 5.3% / 3.2% 239.5 / 107.5 2.3% / 1.6% 60.5 / 24.5 6.0% / 5.8% 229 / 142

322-07a 14.0% / 8.3% 13 / 4 13.2% / 4.5% 5 / 1 .0% / .0% / 21.6% / 18.8% 8 / 3

422-04 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0

214-05 407.35e 1755 503.2e 608 420.9e 470 341.3e 677

214-07 145.0676983 750 184.1 267 143.3 192 122.3 291

214-08 14.9% 157 17.1% 65 17.9% 61 9.4% 31

214-01 n/a 324 n/a 110 n/a 59 n/a 155

214-02 n/a 235 n/a 65 n/a 45 n/a 125







Witney


15. No. of teams around the child (TACs) initiated











Summary Of Allocated Cases (Referrals) and Profile of Children/Young People Referred

Number of Referrals to Early Intervention as at end of June 2014Figure 1a: Number of EI referrals by academic year

Academic Yr Academic Yr Academic Yr Since Sep 20112011-12 2012-13 2013-14 to date

to date

Oxfordshire 3177 3967 3800 10944South West Oxfordshire 465 504 573 1542South East Oxfordshire 353 665 518 1536East Oxford 428 453 398 1279Littlemore 560 674 427 1661Banbury 383 514 608 1505Bicester 383 454 470 1307West Oxfordshire 521 590 677 1788Other 84 113 129 326

Figure 1b: Number of EI referrals by academic year and referral type

General notes on dataAdditional staffing data is received from HR at end of each month.In the allocated cases (involvements) data, the hubs are identified according to the postcode of child/young person. In the activities data, the hubs are identified according to the postcode of staff member responsible for the activity session.This will mean that where the postcodes are incorrect for staff members the activities will be assigned to the wrong hubs.The 'Other' field shows numbers where no hub has been identified. An assumption has been made that this is due to the child/young person living out of the county.

306339 337

253

482

394

322

220 232

374 377

265232

326

381

232

312341

305342 338

11

3071

16

63

52

30

4966

1861

46

7

59

52

3

12

25

26

55 59148

135

165

84

120

72

76

184100

168

236

116

144

129

175

148

130

104 190

193

280

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2011‐12

2012‐13

2013‐14

2011‐12

2012‐13

2013‐14

2011‐12

2012‐13

2013‐14

2011‐12

2012‐13

2013‐14

2011‐12

2012‐13

2013‐14

2011‐12

2012‐13

2013‐14

2011‐12

2012‐13

2013‐14

SW Oxfordshire SE Oxfordshire East Oxford Littlemore Banbury Bicester West Oxfordshire

EI Generic Involvement Form EI Missing Person Involvement Form EI CAF TAC Involvement Form


Figure 2: Children/Young People Referred by Gender - since September 2013Key messages

Figure 3: Children/Young People referred by ethnicity Since September 2013Key messages

OxfordshireSouth West Oxfordshire

South East Oxfordshire

East Oxford Littlemore Banbury Bicester

West Oxfordshire Other

Asian Bangladeshi 11 0 X X 6 0 X X X

Asian Indian 13 0 0 X X X X X 0

Asian Pakistani 39 X X X 16 14 X 0 0

Other Asian Background 16 X X X X X X X 0

Black Caribbean 15 X X X X 0 X 0 X

Black African 31 X 0 X 17 X X X X

Other Black Background 12 X 0 0 X X X X 0

Chinese 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

White & Black African 26 X 0 8 7 X X X 0

White & Black Caribbean 57 X X 12 22 7 X X 0

White & Asian 24 X X X 8 6 X 0 X

Other Mixed Background 44 X X 6 9 X X 9 X

Other 10 0 X X X 0 0 0 0

White British 2286 380 366 218 188 368 320 412 34

White Irish 6 X 0 0 X 0 0 X XWhite Traveller of Irish Heritage

15 0 0 X X X X X X

White Other 66 6 9 12 13 17 7 X 0

White Gypsy/ Roma 15 X 0 X 0 6 0 X 0

Info not obtained 15 X X X X X X X 0

Refused 8 X X 0 0 X X X 0

Unknown 158 20 6 13 16 18 7 16 62

Total 2867 406 381 269 302 436 334 437 96

South WestOxfordshire

South EastOxfordshire

East Oxford Littlemore Banbury BicesterWest

OxfordshireOther

Male 239 236 164 197 255 171 269 56

Female 198 164 136 140 203 196 201 50

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

Nu

mb

er

Number children/young people by gender

The gender split was 55%:45% between male and female referred to the EI service since September 2013. The gender split appears to be relatively stable over time, with more male than female being referred with the exception of Bicester, where there were more female than male. South West Oxfordshire shows the highest difference in gender split at 59% male to 41% female, followed by Littlemore hub with 58% male and 42% female. The total for hubs and County may differ due to gender not available for unborn child .

White British remains the most common ethnicity amongst Children /Young People referred to the EI service (80%)This month's report highlights that next most frequent groups were those with an Unknown ethnicity at 6% and White Other at 2% .10% of Children /Young People were from BAME (Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic Groups), as a comparison, the proportion of CYP in Oxfordshire that were BAME was 21% (from January 2014 annual school census).


Figure 4: Breakdown by primary special educational needs

Key messages

Figure 5: Breakdown by age profileKey messages

Hub Total To Date0-4 5-10 11-15 16-19 20-25

Oxfordshire 2877 280 969 1182 423 23

South 838 76 270 343 143 6South West Oxfordshire 438 45 147 175 67 XSouth East Oxfordshire 400 31 123 168 76 X

Central 637 68 212 281 75 XEast Oxford 300 19 113 129 38 XLittlemore 337 49 99 152 37 0

North 1295 99 470 532 185 9Banbury 458 32 160 199 63 XBicester 367 18 121 180 45 XWest Oxfordshire 470 49 189 153 77 X

Other 107 37 17 26 20 7

Age Group

Key:ASD - Autistic Spectrum DisorderBESD - Behaviour, Emotional and Social DifficultyHI - Hearing ImpairmentMLD - Moderate Learning DifficultyMSI - Multi-Sensory ImpairmentOTH - Other Special Educational NeedPD - Physical DisabilityPMLD - Profound and Multiple Learning DifficultySLCN - Speech, Language and Communication NeedsSLD - Severe Learning DifficultySPLD - Specific Learning DifficultyVI - Visual Impairment

ASD, 88, 5%

BESD, 685, 41%

MLD, 581, 35%

OTH, 10, 1%

PD, 17, 1%

PMLD, X, 0%

SLCN, 135, 8%

SLD, 13, 1%

SPLD, 126, 7%VI, X, 0%Oxfordshire

0 - 4 yrs, 280, 10%

5-10 yrs, 969, 33%

11-15 yrs, 1182, 41%

16-19 yrs, 423, 15%

20-25 yrs, 23, 1%

Oxfordshire

The proportions of Children / Young People referred to the EI service with SEN have remained relatively stable over time.

It is worth noting the proportion of Children / Young People referred to the EI service with SEN was 58%. In comparison, Oxfordshire had 18% Children / Young People with SEN (from January 2014 annual school census) . BESD (41%) and MLD (35%) are the most common primary needs of those referred to EI Service.

There has been very little change in the age group composition of Children / Young People referred to the EI Service.

As seen in previous months, the largest group referred were 11-15 year olds (41%), followed by 5-10 year olds (33%). Both these age groups cover the primary and secondary school age population. 9% of the referrals are for the age group 0-4 years old.


Southern Area

Central Area

Northern Area

Key

Ages are as at date of referral

0 - 4 yrs, 45, 10%

5-10 yrs, 147, 34%

11-15 yrs, 175, 40%

16-19 yrs, 67, 15%

20-25 yrs, X, 1%

South West Oxfordshire

0 - 4 yrs, 31, 8%

5-10 yrs, 123, 31%11-15 yrs, 168, 42%

16-19 yrs, 76, 19%

20-25 yrs, X, 1%


0 - 4 yrs, 19, 6%

5-10 yrs, 113, 38%

11-15 yrs, 129, 43%

16-19 yrs, 38, 13%

20-25 yrs, X, 0%

East Oxford Hub

0 - 4 yrs, 49, 15%

5-10 yrs, 99, 29%

11-15 yrs, 152, 45%

16-19 yrs, 37, 11%

Littlemore Hub

0 - 4 yrs, 32, 7%

5-10 yrs, 160, 35%11-15 yrs, 199,

43%

16-19 yrs, 63, 14%

20-25 yrs, X, 1%

Banbury Hub

0 - 4 yrs, 18, 5%

5-10 yrs, 121, 33%

11-15 yrs, 180, 49%

16-19 yrs, 45, 12%

20-25 yrs, X, 1%

Bicester Hub

0 - 4 yrs, 49, 10%

5-10 yrs, 189, 40%

11-15 yrs, 153, 33%

16-19 yrs, 77, 16%

20-25 yrs, X, 1%

West Oxfordshire


Key messages

Figure 6: Number of allocated cases opened & number of NEW children/young people referred since September 2013

Figure 7: Number allocated cases opened during academic year September 2012-13

Figure 8: Number allocated cases opened during academic year September 2011-12

Allocated Cases (Involvements) Opened And Number Of Children/Young People Referred




OxfordshireOther

Allocated Cases 504 665 453 674 514 454 590 113YP Referred 405 488 351 499 385 328 424 98

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Nu

mb

er




OxfordshireOther


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Nu

mb

er




OxfordshireOther


0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

Nu

mb

er

Since September 2013, the highest number of allocated cases recorded were by West Oxfordshire hub (677), followed by Banbury hub (608), in comparison the least number of allocated cases were recorded at East Oxford Hub (398). Littlemore hub recorded the most during 2011-12 and 2012-13 academic years (560) and (674) respectively.

Please note: The charts below show number of referrals (allocated cases) and number of NEW children /young people referred during the academic years (NEW, meaning that they have been referred for the first time to EI service).


Core Offer (Status) for Allocated CasesKey messages

Figure 9:Core offers since September 2013

Core-offer OxfordshireSouth West Oxfordshire

South East Oxfordshire East Oxford Littlemore Banbury Bicester


Access to EET 87 8 18 X 6 15 14 15 8Community Outreach Work X X X 0 0 0 X 0 0Counselling provision 40 X X 0 6 0 10 14 XDirect work with CYPF 1,685 254 309 161 196 262 215 233 55Diversion Activities 38 9 13 0 11 0 X X XMentoring/Coaching provision 47 X 6 18 X X 0 12 0Missing from School 57 12 X 0 16 20 X X XOpen access and Targetted Sess 213 X 24 10 19 17 102 38 XParenting Course 294 34 45 X 15 68 40 78 12Restorative Practice 8 X X 0 0 0 0 X 0Signpost to Other Service 35 X 8 X 0 0 0 19 X

Total (All Core offers) 4489 668 657 497 460 695 535 827 150

Total (EI Generic core offers) 2,507 333 433 198 272 385 386 418 82

Closed allocated cases by Outcome since September 2013Key messages

Figure 10: Closed allocated cases by Outcome -since September 2011

Outcome OxfordshireSouth West Oxfordshire




Avoid Teenage Pregnancy X X 0 0 0 X 0 0 0Improve Attainment Levels X 0 0 0 0 0 X 0 0Improve attend/attain for CLA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Reduce Caring Responsibility 7 0 0 0 0 X X X 0Improve emp, edu or train 13 X X X 0 X X X 0Improved School Attendance 14 X 0 X X 7 X 0 0Reduce C and YP in need 159 8 65 11 7 11 45 10 XReduce non accident hosp admis X X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0Reduce Offending/entry to CJS 7 X X 0 X 0 0 0 0Reduce School Exclusions 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Child/YP moved to adult servic 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Child/YP moved to tier4 servic 15 X X 0 X 7 X X 0Child/YP not engaging 55 6 X 7 8 11 7 8 XInnapropriate use of CAT/TAC 6 0 0 X X 0 0 0 XMoved out of Oxon area 10 X 0 0 0 X X 0 XMoved to TAC Process 213 27 18 23 20 29 22 68 6Parent/Carer not engaging 49 9 X X X 14 9 9 XDeceased X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0TAC Not completed 16 7 6 X 0 0 0 X 0TAC Outcome Achieved 57 11 X 11 X 11 X 9 XCAF Outcome Achieved 78 10 X X X 18 X 34 XReturned to CAF/TAC Process 12 0 0 X 0 X X X XReferred to further work in EI 36 10 7 X X X X 6 0Referred to other agency 10 0 X X X X X X 0Hub Service Inappropriate 48 X 0 8 6 17 X 6 XCompleted CSE Screening 6 0 0 0 0 X 0 X XReview CSE Screening X 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 0Referred to Tier4 agency 10 X X 0 0 0 X X 0Update CAF/TAC processes X X 0 X 0 0 0 X 0Step Up to Social Care 10 0 X X X 0 X 0 XNo Further Action 459 58 62 62 69 78 41 70 19Signpost to other service 65 X 10 14 8 6 X 17 XReferred to BIAS X 0 X 0 0 0 0 0 0Returned to school 18 8 0 0 X X X X 0Blank/No outcome recorded 239 58 75 15 9 23 21 23 15

Total since September 13 1626 237 270 186 146 257 184 284 62

The data tables below are used to determine the impact of EI Service involvement with child / young person and family.The most frequent Outcomes selected for closed allocated cases are highlighted in the table below.Since September 2013, 28% allocated cases were closed with "No Further Action" required, 13% were closed where child / young person was "Moved to TAC process" and 10% were closed where "Reduce C and YP in need" outcome was recorded.teAcross the County 6% allocated cases were closed where Child/YP or Parent/Carers were not engaging . For Bicester hub in particular 11% closed allocated cases were with such outcomes.cd cases were closed as the child/ young person was moved onto tier 4 service. Data Quality:Since September 2013, 15% of closed allocated cases did not have an outcome recorded, and 10% closed allocated cases since September 2011were without an outcome. South East Oxfordshire hub had left highest proportion blank at 28%, followed by South West Oxfordshire at 24% since September 2013.

The data tables below exclude core-offers related to CAFs &TACs, Missing Children and Signpost to Other Services.The summary of number of CAFs and TACs can be found in appendix 1.

This month's data is following the trend set since September 2013 where 'Direct work with children, young people and families' is the most popular core-offer selected (67% ) since September 2013 and (60%) during academic year 2012-13).

The other most popular core offers selected by EI hubs are highlighted in the tables below, including "Parenting Course" at (10%) and "Open access and targetted sessions" at (8%)


Allocated Cases by Presenting Issue (Reason) Key Messages

Figure 11: Number of presenting issues for allocated cases opened - since September 2013





3+ Fixed Term Exclusions 176 56 20 X 33 34 9 20 X

Absenteeism >= 15% over 3 term 120 9 X X 19 32 25 27 X

Academic Underachievement 459 58 19 15 110 72 69 109 7

Anti-Social behaviour/Risk 282 36 18 7 57 75 42 44 X

Attachment Issues 237 24 21 9 53 33 36 55 6

Attendance/Absenteeism 489 51 28 43 84 92 81 97 13

Awaiting reason from CAF audit 56 0 0 X 17 30 6 0 X

Behaviour Difficulties 1,122 125 274 77 140 163 95 217 31

Bereavement/Loss 139 21 12 X 27 35 11 27 X

Bullying - Perpetrator 62 X X X 14 17 9 11 0

Bullying - Victim 152 12 X 17 26 29 17 44 X

Child - Domestic Abuse Victim 91 7 X X X 40 13 16 X

Child - Social Isolation 158 17 X 23 32 41 7 29 X

Child on Child Protection Plan 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Communication/Interaction Diff 183 19 X 7 44 42 13 53 0

Developmental Delay 116 X X X 29 20 13 40 X

Dietary Issues 137 20 6 X 34 24 12 35 X

Disability/Difficulty-Learning 207 28 8 6 30 42 29 60 X

Disability/Difficulty-Physical 63 X X X 12 12 9 23 X

Discrimination - Perpertrator 6 0 0 0 X X 0 0 0

Discrimination - Victim 17 X 0 X X 7 0 X X

Emotional Wellbeing Support 1,037 148 106 94 120 184 161 202 22

Environmental Issues 74 8 6 0 20 13 7 17 XExclusion permanent / risk of 77 10 X 0 26 13 7 17 Xfamily breakdown 314 53 33 13 14 47 28 116 10Family frequent Police involve 29 X X X 6 8 X X 0

Financial Difficulties 120 22 12 X 14 8 16 42 X

Gang Related Crime Involvement X 0 0 X X X 0 0 0

Harrasment - Perpertrator 8 0 0 0 7 X 0 0 0

Harrasment Victim 31 X 0 X 9 X X 9 X

Homelessness 63 7 X X 11 23 X 9 X

Household 1+ anti-soc behaviou 24 0 0 0 9 11 X X 0

Household 1+ child offences 9 X 0 0 X X X X 0

Illness - Long Term 32 X 0 X X 12 X 9 X

Illness - Physical 74 7 X X X 10 11 36 XIn PRU/Alt prov re exclusion 24 X X 0 X 9 X X 0LA Considering as a LAC 11 X 0 X X 7 X 0 0Living Independently 19 X X 0 X X X X XLooked After - at risk of 25 0 X 0 X 11 X X XLow Self Esteem 646 64 71 40 87 126 105 146 7Mental Health Issues 268 33 9 8 37 41 39 92 9Missing from School 43 19 X 0 X 14 X X 0Neighbourhood Conflict 46 X X X 20 7 X 7 XNot in ed or Training 133 22 20 13 13 17 11 28 9Not on School Role 22 X X 0 X 12 X 0 XOffending Behaviour 132 6 13 6 30 37 24 14 X

The most frequent Presenting Issues selected since September 2013 has been 'Behaviour Difficulties' and 'Emotional Wellbeing Support' both at 9%, followed by 'Parenting Challenges/Diffs ' at 6%.The most frequent PIs for academic year 2012-13 were "Emotional Wellbeing Support" at 7%, followed by "Academic Underachievement" and "Attendance/Absenteeism" both at 6%. The tables below highlight frequently selected 'Reasons'.

There is no limit to the number of PIs that can be assigned to an allocated case - the number of PIs for an allocated case varied from 1 to 39 PIs. These could highlight where the complexity of some cases might lie.


Parent Adult proven offences 15 X 0 0 8 X 0 X 0

Parent Bereavement/Loss 26 X X 0 X 10 0 7 0Parent Breastfeeding Support 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Parent Disability/Dif Learning 39 X X 0 10 8 X 8 X

Parent Disability/Dif Physical 64 X X X 17 15 10 10 X

Parent Domestic Abuse 44 8 7 6 X X X 7 X

Parent Domestic Abuse Curre 39 X 0 X 7 20 X X 0

Parent Domestic Abuse Perp 42 8 0 X X 20 X X X

Parent Domestic Abuse Prev 175 11 X X 40 45 20 45 9

Parent Domestic Abuse Victim 185 11 8 12 39 45 20 44 6

Parent Educat, Emp, Train 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Parent Emotional Support 484 40 50 9 75 106 68 115 21

Parent Imprisonment History 30 X X X 11 X X X X

Parent Inv in Gang Rel Crime X 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0

Parent Long Term Health Cond 127 6 9 X 28 44 17 18 X

Parent Managing Behaviour 448 38 35 13 77 101 48 124 12

Parent Offending Behav/Risk 21 X X 0 6 7 X X 0

Parent Poor self care 44 X X X 11 15 X 9 0

Parent Social Isolation 165 11 X 7 41 34 19 40 9

Parent Substance Misuse-alcoho 120 15 9 8 26 22 9 27 X

Parent Substance Misuse-Drugs 65 8 X X 19 19 7 X X

Parent Under 18 conception 9 X 0 0 X X 0 X 0Parent Unemp/NEET 163 X X 7 33 35 24 52 X

Parent/Family member in Prison 24 X X X 9 X X X 0

Parenting Challenges/Diffs 652 78 62 10 148 126 37 174 17

Peer Relationship Issues 323 26 27 6 59 77 38 87 X

Poor Self Care 97 7 0 X 23 33 6 22 X

Previous missing from home 11 X 0 0 X X X X 0

Previous missing from school 7 X 0 0 X 0 0 0 0

Previously on CP Register 57 6 X X 16 15 6 8 0

Prolific Offender in Family 11 0 0 X 6 X 0 0 0

Refugee/Asylum Seeker 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Safeguarding Concerns 191 26 10 12 51 39 12 35 6

Sexualised Behaviour 74 9 X X X 32 7 12 X

Sibling - Learning Disability 28 6 X 0 X X X 9 X

Sibling-Physical Disability 18 0 0 X 6 X X X 0

Sibling-Physical Illness 7 0 0 0 X 0 X X 0

Substance Misuse - Alcohol 55 9 10 X 8 11 7 7 X

Substance Misuse - Drugs 126 20 19 9 21 15 12 27 XVictim of Crime 14 0 X 0 X 0 X 10 0

Young Carer 222 16 21 13 34 64 21 50 X

Young Parent - Father X 0 X X X 0 0 0 X

Young Parent - Mother 29 X X 0 9 6 6 X X

Young Parent to be - Father X 0 0 0 X 0 0 0 0

Young Parent to be - Mother 10 0 0 0 X 0 X 6 0

Youth Restorative Disposal 9 X X 0 X 0 0 0 0

Total Presenting Issues 11,814 1,317 1,047 573 2,096 2,460 1,367 2,664 290


Allocated Cases by Level of Intervention and Risk of entering Social CareKey messages

Figure 12: Number of generic allocated cases by level of intervention -since September 2013

Hub Total Red Amber Green BlankOxfordshire 2352 75 432 1641 204 (9%)

Southern 730 17 76 531 106 (15%)South West Oxfordshire 336 10 57 194 75 (22%)South East Oxfordshire 394 7 19 337 31 (8%)

Central 493 12 64 400 17 (3%)East Oxford 228 X 18 193 13 (6%)Littlemore 265 8 46 207 4 (2%)

Northern 1051 43 276 654 78 (7%)Banbury 381 15 144 164 58 (15%)Bicester 341 16 99 207 19 (6%)West Oxfordshire 329 12 33 283 1 (0%)

Other 78 X 16 56 3 (4%)

Figure 13: Number of generic allocated cases by risk of entering social care - since September 2013

Hub Total High Medium Low BlankOxfordshire 2352 236 313 1439 364 (15%)

Southern 730 58 69 360 243 (33%)South West Oxfordshire 336 38 51 165 82 (24%)South East Oxfordshire 394 20 18 195 161 (41%)

Central 493 64 79 332 18 (4%)East Oxford 228 18 31 165 14 (6%)Littlemore 265 46 48 167 4 (2%)

Northern 1051 109 156 702 84 (8%)Banbury 381 57 81 182 61 (16%)Bicester 341 17 60 243 21 (6%)West Oxfordshire 329 35 15 277 2 (1%)

Other 78 X 9 45 19 (24%)

The figures below are based on EI Generic involvements only (exluding involvements where the core offer was "signpost to other service").

Level of InterventionThe percentage of allocated cases with high level of intervention (Red) since September 2013 is 3%, 3% point lower compared to end of 2012-13 academic year (6%). Medium level (Amber) is also considerablly lower at 18% compared to 26% at end of 2012-13 and the low level (Green) is 70% and that is 9% higher when compared to 2012-13 academic year (61%)

Data Quality:Since September 2013, 9% of all allocated cases recorded had this field left blank. This month the hubs with the highest proportion for leaving this field blank were South West Oxfordshire hub (22%) and Banbury hub (15%).

Risk of Entering Social CareThe percentage of allocated cases with risk of entering social care "High" since September 2013 is 10%. For Littlemore hub in particular, 17% generic allocated cases were recorded with "High" risk of entering social care, which is 3% point lower compared to 20% during 2012-13 academic year. The Banbury hub "High" risk is at 15% and is 3 percent point higher compared to 2012-13.

Data Quality:Since September 2013, 15% allocated cases recorded had this field left blank. This month the hubs with the highest proportion for leaving this field blank were South East Oxfordshire at 41% and South West Oxfordshire hub at 24%.

Key:

High - Complex level 3 needs where there are multiple risk factors across the Assessment Framework. Consideration of "toxic three", domestic abuse, mental health or substance misuse.

Medium - Identification of at least one level 3 need with multiple level 2 issues across the Assessment Framework

Low - Identification or time limited enhanced intervention to make child into level one, universal services

Key:

Red 8-10+ hours contact or liaison time required per week

Amber 4-7 hours contact or liaison time required per week

Green 2-3 hours contact or liaison time required per week


Allocated Cases By Source Of ReferralKey messages

Figure 14: Number of referrals (incl Missing Children & CAFs / TACs) by source of referral since September 2013




CEF 1000 149 66 111 130 174 140 192 38Adult Mental Health Team 7 0 0 0 0 0 X 6 0Behaviour Support Service X 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 XChildrens Centre Staff 142 18 8 11 24 12 24 29 16Connexions X 0 0 0 X X 0 X 0Educational Psychologist X X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0EYSENIT 9 X 0 X X 0 0 0 0SENSS X 0 0 X X 0 0 0 0Social Care (Childrens') 312 52 27 40 61 52 32 39 9Social Inclusion Officer 14 X 0 X X X 0 X 0Behaviour, Incl & Att service 7 X X X 0 X 0 0 0Hub Worker 440 67 24 39 30 88 75 107 10Young Carers Service 6 X 0 0 X 0 0 X 0Youth Offending Service 34 X 6 X X 12 6 X XYouth, Engagement & Opps X X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

School 1494 190 134 146 177 300 223 298 26Assistant Headteacher 21 X X 0 X 0 X 9 XDeputy Head 18 6 0 0 0 8 X X 0Headteacher 139 20 37 X 0 26 6 46 0Home Sch Link Worker 254 24 6 44 59 60 26 33 XLearning Mentor 8 X X 0 0 0 0 X 0Learning Support Manager 14 X X 0 0 X 0 X XOther School Staff 154 14 26 8 20 11 25 46 XPastoral Support Manager 55 8 X X 0 22 12 7 XSchool 392 61 37 70 47 39 45 85 8School Support Teacher 49 6 7 X 6 X 15 9 0School Support Worker 181 6 X 6 25 103 27 8 XSENCO 206 31 6 12 19 20 65 50 XMeadowbrook College X X 0 0 0 X 0 0 0

Health 306 71 27 28 31 33 23 77 16Clinical Nurse Specialist X X X 0 X 0 0 0 0Doctor 63 19 9 X X X X 22 XDrugs Case Worker X X 0 0 0 0 0 X 0Health Visitor 101 24 X X 14 10 X 30 10Midwife 15 X X 0 0 0 X 7 XPCAMHS CAMHS 111 23 10 17 10 20 15 15 XSchool Nurse 11 0 X X X X 0 X 0

CYP/Parent/Carer 67 11 6 6 6 16 10 8 XParent/Carer 41 8 X X 6 X X 7 XSelf 26 X X X 0 12 X X X

Other 655 114 108 94 82 78 73 83 23Domestic Violence Team 7 X X 0 X 0 0 0 0Job Centre X 0 X 0 0 X 0 0 0Not Yet Known 6 X 0 0 X X 0 X XOther Professional 204 29 45 19 20 16 46 20 9Other Voluntary Organisation 8 0 X X 0 X 0 0 0Police 428 83 55 74 60 54 27 62 13

Blank 278 38 177 13 X 7 X 19 22

3522 535 341 385 426 601 469 658 107

Total allocated cases 3800 573 518 398 427 608 470 677 129

Source Job role of person referring the child/ young person to the Early Intervention Service

Allocated cases with source recorded

For this month's report, School group is the most common source of referrals to EI Service, 42% of referrals since Sept 13 and 46% during 2012-13 academic year. The frequent source of referrals for each group are highlighted in the tables below.

Within CEF(Children, Education and Families), Hub Workers and Social Care referred most at 44% and 31% respectively.Within School group, generic school and Home School Link Worker referred most at 26%, and 17% respectively.Within Health group, Health visitor and PCAHMS CAHMS referred the most at 33% and 36% respectively.

Police referred 12% referral during academice year 2013-14 to date and 10% during 2012-13 to EI Service.


Figure 15: Number of referrals (incl Missing Children & CAFs / TACs) - Academic Yr 2012-13



East Oxford

Littlemore Banbury BicesterWest

OxfordshireOther

CEF 977 133 95 94 166 147 150 166 26Adult Mental Health Team X X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0ASET Advisory Service X X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Childrens Centre Staff 110 9 X 24 30 12 8 19 XConnexions 29 16 X X X X X X 0EYSENIT 7 6 0 0 0 X 0 0 0SENSS X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0Social Care (Childrens') 286 43 55 33 62 49 15 18 11Social Inclusion Officer 6 0 X X X 0 0 X 0Behaviour, Incl & Att service 7 X 0 X X 0 X 0 0Hub Worker 458 48 21 26 57 61 119 117 9Young Carers Service 6 0 X 0 X X 0 X 0Youth Offending Service 54 X 10 X 10 14 X 7 XYouth, Engagement & Opps X 0 X 0 0 X X 0 0

School 1735 171 300 217 333 205 217 252 40Assistant Headteacher 15 X X 0 X X X X 0Deputy Head 19 X X X X 7 X X 0Foundation Support Teacher 7 X 6 0 0 0 0 0 0Headteacher 156 X 75 X X 18 7 42 6Home Sch Link Worker 246 37 23 60 73 17 18 17 XLearning Mentor 12 6 X 0 X X X 0 0Learning Support Manager 28 X X X 0 18 0 X 0Other School Staff 287 10 36 29 81 21 38 66 6Pastoral Support Manager 31 7 X X X 7 7 X 0School 467 62 108 89 110 11 18 55 14School Support Teacher 56 X 9 6 X 11 13 6 6School Support Worker 156 X 6 X 34 69 26 11 6SENCO 251 31 25 21 24 23 79 47 XMeadowbrook College X 0 0 X 0 X X 0 0Virtual School X 0 0 X 0 0 0 0 0

Health 357 68 43 34 46 55 36 64 11Childrens Community Nurse 6 X 0 0 X X X X 0Clinical Nurse Specialist X X 0 0 0 X X X 0Doctor 21 X 7 X X X X X 0Drugs Case Worker X 0 0 X 0 0 0 X 0Health Visitor 127 35 13 16 18 9 11 19 6Midwife 23 0 X 0 0 10 X 7 XOccupational Therapist X 0 0 0 0 X 0 0 0PCAMHS CAMHS 145 26 21 12 21 28 15 20 XSchool Nurse 26 X X X X X X 8 X

CYP/Parent/Carer 115 40 14 12 8 7 20 10 XParent/Carer 54 16 6 7 6 6 6 6 XSelf 61 24 8 X X X 14 X X

Other 613 59 118 87 111 100 26 96 16Domestic Violence Team X X 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Job Centre 6 X 0 0 0 0 0 0 XNot Yet Known 11 0 X X X X 0 X 0Other Professional 194 10 48 27 35 24 7 35 8Other Voluntary Organisation 21 X X X X 11 X 0 XPolice 380 42 65 57 70 64 16 60 6

Blank 170 33 95 9 10 0 X X 16

Allocated cases with source 3797 471 570 444 664 514 449 588 97

Total allocated cases 3967 504 665 453 674 514 454 590 113

NotesSource Job role of person referring the child/ young person to the Early Intervention Service


Number of Activity KPIs recorded by Early Intervention Hubs

Key messages

Figure 16: Number of KPIs selected for all activity sessions recorded by EI Hubs Since September 2013

Activity as per EI KPISouth West Oxfordshire


West Oxfordshire Oxfordshire

Avoid Teenage Pregnancy 140 222 20 48 59 253 16 758Improve Attainment Levels 399 479 86 478 384 1,008 821 3,655Improve attend & attain for CLA 110 51 96 156 110 136 86 745Improve Caring Responsibilities 182 299 178 307 148 972 283 2,369Improve School Attendance 410 395 194 312 260 819 722 3,112Increase emp, ed or train 161 363 565 131 262 226 415 2,123Red non acc injury hosp admis 112 237 89 10 31 369 268 1,116Reduce C and YP in need 1,465 2,039 2,636 2,229 2,212 4,061 2,279 16,921Reduce Offence/entry to CJS 30 367 46 215 102 384 213 1,357Reduce School Exclusions 220 433 50 169 75 417 298 1,662EI Service but no EI KPI 19 7 X 9 52 X X 97Error (wrong service selected) 0 0 X 0 0 X 8 12(blank) / no selection made 14 X 7 16 22 18 X 84

0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

The most popular KPI chosen since September 2013 has been "Reducing C and YP in need" which accounts for 50% of all KPIs assigned to activity sessions. This trend was reflected across all hubs. The other frequent KPIs selected are highlighted in the table below, and include "Improve Attainment Level" at 11% and "Improve School Attendance" at 9%.

Data Quality:

Since September 2013, 193 activity sessions recorded had no KPI selected or wrong service selected.

AvoidTeenagePregnanc

y

ImproveAttainment Levels

Improveattend &attain for

CLA

ImproveCaring

Responsibilities

ImproveSchool

Attendance

Increaseemp, edor train

Red nonacc injury

hospadmis

Reduce Cand YP in

need

ReduceOffence/e

ntry toCJS

ReduceSchool

Exclusions

EI Servicebut no EI

KPI

Error(wrongservice

selected)

(blank) /no

selectionmade

Activity as per EI KPI 758 3,655 745 2,369 3,112 2,123 1,116 16,921 1,357 1,662 97 12 84

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

8,000

9,000

10,000

11,000

12,000

13,000

14,000

15,000

16,000

17,000

18,000

Nu

mb

er

Early Intervention KPI

Number of Activity sessions as per EI KPI since September 2012 for Oxfordshire


Key ContactsJob title Email Tel no

Early Intervention Service DataIlyas Najeeb EIS Data Officer [email protected] 01865 810549Caroline Rixon EI Senior

Information Analyst

[email protected] 01865 816564

MIS Support team (One)Emma Holdaway MIS Manager (One) [email protected] 01865 810627

James Lord MIS Support Officer [email protected] 01865 816283

Hub Managers and Team Leaders

South West Oxfordshire James Carter Hub Manager [email protected] 01865 328400Andy Robinson Team LeaderKathy Peto Team Leader

BanburyHelen Kilby Hub Manager [email protected] 01865 328440Diane Long Team LeaderLiane Low Team LeaderSophie Black Team Leader

BicesterRichard Savage Hub Manager [email protected] 01865 328470Elaine North Team

LeaderJane Roffey Team

Leader

South East Oxfordshire Susan Blake Hub Manager [email protected] 01865 328480Paul Merritt Team

Janice Nicholls Team Leader

East OxfordSarah Burrows Hub Manager [email protected] 01865 328490Nicky Brodie Team

LeaderDawn Thompson Team

Leader

LittlemoreDelia Mann Hub Manager [email protected] 01865 816202Ruth Byant Team

LeaderAlison Barlow Team Leader

West OxfordshireAnnelies Henshall Hub Manager [email protected] 01865 328730Amanda Rowley Team

LeaderAnthony Sayles Team

Leader

Early Intervention Service work streams

Youth Offending ServiceGill Halstead Performanc

e Review & Management Information Officer

[email protected] 01865 815929

Youth, Engagement & Opportunities TeamEmily Smith IAG Development Officer [email protected] 01865 815627Profile Helpdesk [email protected] 01865 328410


Summary of CAF and TAC from ONE system by academic year since January 2007.

Sum

mar

y of

all

CA

Fs a

nd T

AC

s al

loca

ted

case

s re

cord

ed in

the

ON

E s

yste

m

Num

ber o

f CA

Fs a

nd T

AC

s - o

pene

d ea

ch A

cade

mic

Yea

rU

pdat

ed J

une

2014

CA

FsTA

Cs

Sin

ce J

anua

ry 2

007

Tota

l20

06/

0720

07/

0820

08/

0920

09/

1020

10/

1120

11/

1220

12/

1320

13/

14To

tal

2006

/07

2007

/08

2008

/09

2009

/10

2010

/11

2011

/12

2012

/13

2013

/14

Oxf

ords

hire

3346

7028

851

658

262

658

468

056

726

2944

264

471

516

474

394

466

480

Sou

ther

n89

428

9913

317

419

013

513

512

372

016

9612

114

512

597

120

114

Sou

th W

est O

xfor

dshi

re44

313

3851

8985

101

6679

350

1040

5670

5847

6986

Sou

th E

ast O

xfor

dshi

re45

115

6182

8510

534

6944

370

656

6575

6750

5128

Cen

tral

941

1556

141

157

192

153

227

9775

4X

6014

017

592

9119

311

9E

ast O

xfor

d45

16

3567

9294

5410

350

361

X26

6810

756

2281

50Li

ttlem

ore

490

921

7465

9899

124

4739

3X

3472

6836

6911

269

Nor

ther

n13

3823

108

199

224

198

281

305

324

1042

2096

186

172

220

201

147

235

Ban

bury

438

733

7282

6395

8611

028

911

2454

5256

4943

65B

ices

ter

330

1025

4041

4279

9359

316

738

5246

6769

3745

Wes

t Oxf

ords

hire

570

650

8710

193

107

126

155

437

X34

8074

9783

6712

5

Oth

er17

3X

2543

2746

1513

2311

3X

1224

2437

X6

12

This

rep

ort i

s ba

sed

on th

e da

ta e

xtra

cted

fro

m C

apita

ON

E s

yste

m a

t end

of M

ay 2

014.

The

an

alys

is b

elow

sho

w n

umbe

r of

CA

Fs a

nd T

AC

s re

cord

ed in

O

NE

sys

tem

dur

ing

each

aca

dem

ic y

ear

sinc

e Ja

nuar

y 20

07. 6

77C

AFs

and

454

TA

Cs

wer

e re

cord

ed d

urin

g 20

12/1

3 ac

adem

ic y

ear,

whe

re 5

84C

AFs

and

38

9TA

Cs

wer

e re

cord

ed d

urin

g pr

evio

us a

cade

mic

yea

r bet

wee

n S

epte

mbe

r 201

1 an

d A

ugus

t 201

2. T

he tr

end

show

s nu

mbe

r of

CA

Fs a

nd T

AC

s re

cord

ed

durin

g 20

12/1

3 w

ere

bette

r th

an p

revi

ous

acad

emic

yea

r 20

11/1

2.

Ple

ase

note

that

the

EI H

ub is

ass

igne

d to

eve

ry r

efer

red

child

/you

ng p

erso

n ba

sed

on th

eir

hom

e po

stco

de. T

he O

ther

area

incl

udes

ref

erra

ls w

here

th

ere

is

no p

ostc

ode

reco

rded

in th

e O

NE

sys

tem

or t

he p

ostc

ode

is o

utsi

de O

xfor

dshi

re.

This

rep

ort i

s ba

sed

on th

e da

ta e

xtra

cted

fro

m C

apita

ON

E s

yste

m a

t end

of J

une

2014

. Th

e a

nalys

is b

elow

sho

w n

umbe

r of

CA

Fs a

nd T

AC

s re

cord

ed in

O

NE

sys

tem

dur

ing

each

aca

dem

ic y

ear

sinc

e Ja

nuar

y 20

07. 6

80C

AFs

and

466

TA

Cs

wer

e re

cord

ed d

urin

g 20

12/1

3 ac

adem

ic y

ear,

whe

re 5

84C

AFs

and

39

4TA

Cs

wer

e re

cord

ed d

urin

g pr

evio

us a

cade

mic

yea

r bet

wee

n S

epte

mbe

r 201

1 an

d A

ugus

t 201

2. T

he tr

end

show

s nu

mbe

r of

CA

Fs a

nd T

AC

s re

cord

ed

durin

g 20

12/1

3 w

ere

bette

r th

an p

revi

ous

acad

emic

yea

r 20

11/1

2.

Ple

ase

note

that

the

EI H

ub is

ass

igne

d to

eve

ry r

efer

red

child

/you

ng p

erso

n ba

sed

on th

eir

hom

e po

stco

de. T

he O

ther

area

incl

udes

ref

erra

ls w

here

th

ere

is

no p

ostc

ode

reco

rded

in th

e O

NE

sys

tem

or t

he p

ostc

ode

is o

utsi

de O

xfor

dshi

re.


Date post:	26-Sep-2020
Category:	Documents
Upload:	others
View:	0 times
Download:	0 times

Early Intervention Service Monthly Performance Report June ... · Ilyas Najeeb...

Documents