Early Life Lead Exposure andSubstance Abuse: is there a
connection??
Tomás R. Guilarte, PhDDean, Robert Stempel College of Public Health &
Social WorkProfessor, Department of Environmental &
Occupational HealthProfessor, Cognitive Neuroscience & Imaging
Member, Biomolecular Sciences InstituteFlorida International University
Miami, FL
oAt least 4 million households havechildren living in them that are beingexposed to high levels of lead.
oThere are approximately half amillion U.S. children ages 1-5 withblood lead levels (BLL) above 5µg/dL, the reference level at whichCDC recommends public healthactions to be initiated.
https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/
Lead ExposureLead is one of ten chemicalsidentified by the World HealthOrganization (WHO, 2010) as beingof “major public health concern”and in need of action (World HealthOrganization, 2010).
CDC: Center for Disease Control and Prevention
Lead Exposure
October 22-28 is National Lead Poisoning Prevention CDC: Center for Disease Control and Prevention
Lead Exposure
CDC
The economic impact of leadexposure in US and Europe: $50.9and $55 billion, respectively.
(Attina & Trasande, 2013)
Lead Exposure and Drug Addiction
Childhood lead intoxication has been associated with learning deficits, antisocialbehaviors, and juvenile delinquency. This study found that heroin users had bonelead levels higher than age-matched controls.
The study suggests an association between lead exposure and substance abuse
What is Drug Addiction?
Drug addiction is a worldwide epidemic, affecting millions of individuals across theglobe. Substance abuse and addiction can result in serious repercussions in medical,financial, legal, and social domains and cost our society roughly $193 billion annuallyin healthcare, crime and lost work productivity (NIDA, 2016).
NIDA: National Institute on Drug Abuse
Addiction is defined as a chronic, relapsingbrain disease characterized by compulsivedrug seeking and use, despite harmfulconsequences. It is considered a braindisease because drugs change the brain; theychange its structure and how it works.
These brain changes can be long lasting andcan lead to many harmful, often self-destructive, behaviors (NIDA, 2016).
o In 2014, there were anestimated 1.5 million currentcocaine users aged 12 or older
Cocaine Use
o Adults aged 18 to 25 yearshave a higher rate of currentcocaine use than any otherage group
https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/research-reports/cocaine/what-scope-cocaine-use-in-united-states
Drug Addiction
How we can identifya relationshipbetween Pb2+-exposure and
predisposition todrug addiction?
Lead Exposure Paradigm
ControlPb2+
(1500 ppm)
MatingExposure
Birth WeaningSex & cull
PN-0 PN-21 PN-28 PN-50
BehavioralEndpoints
* *
Males Females
PN-28 Mean (µg/dL) ± S.E.MControl
Pb2+ 1500 ppm≤ 1.9ƚ (n=20)
20.38 ± 0.61 (n=25)≤ 1.9ƚ (n=18)
26.55 ± 1.55 (n=22)
Males Females
PN-50 Mean (µg/dL) ± S.E.MControl
Pb2+ 1500 ppm≤ 1.9ƚ (n=20)
19.8 ± 0.6 (n=25)≤ 1.9ƚ (n=18)
21.75 ± 1.55 (n=22)
Blood Lead Levels
60 minutes
-Habituation
i.p.
-Drug administration
- Saline- 5 or 15 mg/kgcocaine-HCl.
-Locomotor activity
60 minutesTotal distance travelled
Locomotor Activity
Acute locomotor responses arean indicator of drug sensitivity
Most drugs of abuse stimulatelocomotor behavior through activationof the dopaminergic circuits thatcontribute to their reinforcing effects(Wise 1987; Di Chiara 1995).
Cocaine typically increase motoractivity in two ways:
At lower doses (<20 mg/kg) , theambulatory activity is increased, this ismeasured as an increase in distancetraveled.
At higher doses (>20 mg/kg),locomotor behavior decreases andstereotypic behavior emerges, which ismanifested as an increase in sniffing,grooming, head bobbing, or otherrepetitive behaviors and a decrease indistance traveled.
n=15, 15, 15 n=14, 16, 17Two Way ANOVA, posthoc: BonferroniTreatment F 1,89= 5.049, p=0.027Drugs F 2,89 = 29.113, p≤0.001 Two Way ANOVA, posthoc: BonferroniTreatment F 1,76 = 7.496, p=0.008Drugs F 2,76 = 49.55, p≤0.001
n= 13, 13, 13 n=15, 15, 13
Locomotor ActivityPN-28
84% 60%
Locomotor ActivityPN-50
n=15, 15, 15 n=17, 17, 17
Two Way ANOVA, posthoc: BonferroniTreatment F 1,90= 7.664, p=0.007Drugs F 2,90= 57.539, p≤0.001
Two Way ANOVA, posthoc: BonferroniTreatment F 1,99= 3.608, p=0.060Drugs F 2,99= 61.511, p≤0.001
n= 18, 17, 18 n=17, 16, 19
55%
Lead Exposure and Drug Addiction
Summary
o Psychostimulant effects of cocaine are higher in lead exposed ratscompared to control
o Psychostimulant effects of cocaine are higher in adolescent lead exposedrats compared to adults
o In adults, the acute psychostimulant effects of cocaine are higher in malelead-exposed than females
o Lead exposed animals have a higher rate of cocaine self-administration
Substance use in adolescence is a key predictor of latersubstance use and related health consequences,including substance use disorders, mental illness, loweducational achievement, and incarceration (Aarons et al., 1999;Hall et al., 2016; Hussong et al., 2017).
Summary
Cocaine effect on the dopaminergic system
60 minutes
-Habituation -Locomotor activity
60 minutes
Total distance travelled
i.p.
-Drug administration
15 mg/kg cocaine-HCl.
SCH-23390(0, 0.05 or 0.1 mg/kg, i.p.)Raclopride(0, 0.05 or 0.1 mg/kg, i.p)
-15 min
D1-D2 Receptor Antagonist Treatment
D1 Receptor Antagonist, PN-28
n=10, 10, 10 n=10, 10, 10 n= 10, 10, 10 n=10, 10, 10
A
BB
B B
C
A
A
BB B B
[3H]-SCH23390 AutoradiographyMales and females, PN-28
D1R Males Females
Mean fmol/mg of tissue ± S.E.
Control n= 8Pb n =7
Control n= 7Pb n=6
StriatumControl
Pb
*, p= 0.0225107.4 ± 4.92127.1 ± 5.92
*, p=0.0127107 ± 3.72
120.6 ± 1.85
NAcControl
Pb
**, p= 0.0014104.6 ± 2.9126.3 ± 4.28
ns115.6 ± 5.74
130 ± 5.7
OTControl
Pb
***, p= 0.0002104.9 ± 4.95143.1 ± 5.48
**, p= 0.007112. 4± 7.4
151.4 ± 7.98
[3H]-SCH23390 AutoradiographyMales and females, PN-28
Summary
o Psychostimulant effects of cocaine are mainly mediated by D1Rin adolescent and adult rats
oD1R levels were increased in the STR, NAc and OT of PN-28 ratsand in the OT of PN-50 rats
oNo changes in D2R levels were detected in any of the brainregions at the ages
The Opioid Epidemic
Karila et al., 2019
The US Opioid Epidemic
https://www.hhs.gov/opioids/
The CDC estimates that the total "economic burden" of prescription opioid misusealone in the United States is $78.5 billion/year,
https://www.drugabuse.gov/drugs-abuse/opioids/opioid-overdose-crisis
The Opioid EpidemicUnited States
2000 2009 2016
Estimated Age-Adjusted Death Rate per 100,000
Source: National Center for Health Statistics, National Vital Statistics System, mortality dataRossen et al., 2017
Numerous studies have implicated all three opioid receptors inbehavioral effects including: analgesia, reward, depression, anxiety,and addiction.
µ,
Opioid Receptor mediated signaling
The most commonly used opioids for pain management act on μ-opioid receptor (MOR) systems.
[3H]-DAMGO AutoradiographyAnatomical Regions
https://instruct.uwo.ca/anatomy/530/ratpix.pdf
LPTN: Lateral post-thalamic nucleiVPM/VPL: Ventral posteromedial and lateromedialthalamic nucleusZID/ZIV: Zona Incerta (dorsal and ventral part)
[3H]-DAMGO Autoradiography PN-28
0 fmol/mg tissue
CONTROL Pb2+
208 fmol/mg tissue
https://instruct.uwo.ca/anatomy/530/ratpix.pdf
Striatum
[3H]-DAMGO AutoradiographyAnatomical Regions
0 fmol/mg tissue
CONTROL Pb2+
208 fmol/mg tissue
MALE
FEMALE
[3H]-DAMGO Autoradiography PN-28
[3H]-DAMGO Autoradiography PN-28 MALES
Hypothalamus Thalamus BasolateralAmygdala
Striatum
Lateralposthalamic nuclei
Striamedullaris ofthe thalamus
Ventralposteromedial
thalamic nucleus
NucleusAccumbens
n=7-8*p<0.05 ,**p<0.01and ,***p<0.001
[3H]-DAMGO Autoradiography PN-28 FEMALES
Hypothalamus Thalamus BasolateralAmygdala
Striatum
Lateralposthalamic nuclei
Striamedullaris ofthe thalamus
Ventralposteromedial
thalamic nucleus
NucleusAccumbens
n=6-8*p<0.05 ,**p<0.01and ,***p<0.001
Summary
o Lead exposure increases the number of MOR in brain regionsthat are relevant to drug use and abuse in adolescent rats
o The increase in MOR makes it possible to increase thesusceptibility of lead-exposed experimental animals/humans tobe more sensitive/susceptible to opioid drugs
oCollectively, these studies suggest that exposure to lead mayincrease the susceptibility of drug use and abuse inadolescence and in young adults.
THANK YOU!
D1 Receptor Antagonist, PN-50
n=15, 14, 14 n=13, 12, 12 n= 11, 10, 12 n=10, 10, 10
[3H]-SCH23390 AutoradiographyMales and females, PN-50
D1R Males Females
Mean fmol/mg of tissue ± S.E.
Control n= 8Pb n =7
Control n= 7Pb n=6
StriatumControl
Pb
ns219.7 11.9231.9 8.4
ns243.7 ± 7.97229.8 ± 11.4
NAcControl
Pb
ns229.0 10.04249.8 12.30
ns222.8 ± 8.03226 ± 17.23
OTControl
Pb
**, p= 0.01198.3 11.9250.0 9.1
ns221± 11.5
214.7 ± 28.2
[3H]-SCH23390 AutoradiographyMales and females, PN-50
Cocaine effects on the Brain
Cocaine enhances dopamine-mediated neurotransmission by elevatingsynaptic levels of dopamine within the mesocorticolimbic pathway, the majorneuroanatomical circuit mediating drug reward.
This pathway originates from dopaminergic-containing cell bodies in theventral tegmental area (VTA) and projects to a number of forebrain areasincluding the frontal cortex, nucleus accumbens, caudate putamen, olfactorytubercle, hippocampus, and amygdala (Fallon and Moore, 1978).
What dopamine receptor subtype mediates thecocaine-induced increase in locomotor activity?
From Korpi et al., 2015
cAMP cAMP
Dopamine
How to study Drug Abuse using Animal models
REPEATED INTAKERECREATIONAL USE
Stable Self-administration
INITIALEXPERIMENTATION
ConditionedAversion
ConditionedPreference
AcuteLocomotion
Acquisition ofself
administration
COMPULSIVE DRUGSEEKING
Self-adminw/permutations
modelingcompulsion
Sensitization
Modified from Schramm-Sapyta et al., 2009
ATTEMPTEDCESSATION,
WITHDRAWALWithdrawalin animals
Opioid Receptor mediated signaling
Opioid peptides and their receptors are expressed throughout thenociceptive neural circuitry and in regions involved in reward andemotion-related brain structures.
MOR are of the most effective analgesics, they are alsoefficacious mood enhancers and cause activation of centraldopamine reward pathways that modulate euphoria.
Beyond the rewarding aspect of drugconsumption, pharmacological studies have alsosuggested a role for this receptor in themaintenance of drug use, as well as craving andrelapse
MOR mediated signaling
n=10, 10, 10 n=10, 10, 10 n= 10, 10, 10 n=10, 10, 10
A
A
A
A
A
AA A
A
B
A, B
A, B
D2 Receptor Antagonist, PN-28
[3H]-Raclopride Autoradiography,Males and Females, PN-28
https://epi.envirocenter.yale.edu/2018-epi-report/heavy-metals
Lead-Polluted Sites
Behavioral Sensitization
60 minutes-Habituation
-Drugadministration 15 mg/kg cocaine-HCl
i.p.
-Locomotoractivity
60 minutesTotal
distancetravelled
Repeated exposure to Cocaine canlead to a phenomenon calledsensitization, in which the ambulatory orstereotypic response to a repeated lowdose is augmented (Segal andKuczenski, 1992).
Sensitization is a manifestation ofneuroplastic changes in response torepeated exposure, and someresearchers have hypothesized that it isa behavioral correlate of increaseddrug craving and development ofdependence (Robinson and Berridge 1993,2000, 2001, 2008).
Sensitization represents a lastingneuroplastic change that is easilymeasured.
5 DAYSAbstinence 2 Days
Reinstatement
Two Way RM ANOVA, posthoc: BonferroniTreatment F 1,90=3.087, p= 0.096Days F 5,90=5.844, p<0.001
Two Way RM ANOVA, posthoc: BonferroniTreatment F 1,85=0.000135, p= 0.991Days F 5,85=10.231, p<0.001
Behavioral Sensitization,PN-28
Behavioral Sensitization,PN-50
Two Way RM ANOVA, posthoc: BonferroniTreatment F 1,90= 1.624, p=0.219Days F 5,90= 8.327, p<0.001
Two Way RM ANOVA, posthoc: BonferroniTreatment F 1,95=7.129, p=0.015Days F 5,95=22.034, p<0.001
Summary
o Developmental Pb2+ exposure increases the response to thepsychostimulant effects of cocaine in male and femaleadolescent rats
o Developmental Pb2+ exposure increases the response to thepsychostimulant effects of cocaine in male adult rats
o The enhancement of the cocaine-induced locomotor activity inPb2+ exposed rats is mainly mediated by D1R
o Developmental Pb2+ exposure could predispose to drug use inearly adolescence.
0 fmol/mg tissue
CONTROL Pb2+
208 fmol/mg tissue
MALE
FEMALE
[3H]-DAMGO Autoradiography PN-28
[3H]-DAMGO Autoradiography
PN-28
Hypo Thal BLA
% increase 126 809 167p value 0.0778 0.0015 0.0024
Control n= 8Pb n = 7
[3H]-DAMGO Autoradiography
Control n= 8Pb n = 7
LPTN SM VPM/VPL
% increase 104 205 235p value 0.0032 0.0026 0.0379
LPTN: Lateral post-thalamic nucleiSM: Stria MedullarisVPM/VPL: Ventral posteromedial and lateromedial thalamic nucleusZID/ZIV: Zona Incerta (dorsal and ventral part)
PN-28
PN-28
Hypo Thal BLA% increase 244 104 157
p value 0.0344 0.0023 0.042
Control n= 8Pb n = 6
[3H]-DAMGO Autoradiography
LPTN SM VPM/VPL% increase 112 85 326
p value 0.0064 0.0653 0.025
Control n= 8Pb n = 6
LPTN: Lateral post-thalamic nucleiSM: Stria MedullarisVPM/VPL: Ventral posteromedial and lateromedial thalamic nucleusZID/ZIV: Zona Incerta (dorsal and ventral part)
[3H]-DAMGO Autoradiography
PN-28
D2 Receptor Antagonist, PN-50
n=10, 10, 10 n=10, 10, 10 n= 10, 10, 10 n=10, 10, 10
[3H]-Raclopride Autoradiography,Males and Females, PN-50
0102030405060708090
100
74dB 78dB 82dB 86dB 90dB
% In
hibi
tion
PN28Control Male1500ppm Male
0102030405060708090
100
74dB 78dB 82dB 86dB 90dB
% In
hibi
tion
PN28Control Female1500ppm Female
Control: n=18; 1500ppm: n=19 Control: n=19; 1500ppm: n=19
dB Levels: F(2.56, 92.28) = 42.74; p<0.001Treatment: F(1,36) = 0.01; p=0.942dB Levels x Treatment: F(2.56, 92.28) = 0.17; p=0.888
dB Levels: F(2.57, 89.83) = 68.69; p<0.001Treatment: F(1,35) = 0.54; p=0.467dB Levels x Treatment: F(2.57, 89.83) = 2.56; p=0.069
020406080
100120140160
Control Male 1500ppm Male
Sta
rtle
Res
pons
e (m
V)
T-test (Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances): p= 0.462 T-test (Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances): p= 0.311
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
Control Female 1500ppm Female
Sta
rtle
Res
pons
e (m
V)
-100
102030405060708090
100
74dB 78dB 82dB 86dB 90dB
% In
hibi
tion
PN50Control Male1500ppm Male
0102030405060708090
100
74dB 78dB 82dB 86dB 90dB
% In
hibi
tion
PN50Control Female1500ppm Female
Control: n=18; 1500ppm: n=19 Control: n=18; 1500ppm: n=19
dB Levels: F(2.89, 101.26) = 90.26; p<0.001Treatment: F(1,35) = 0.28; p=0.602dB Levels x Treatment: F(2.89, 101.26) = 0.61; p=0.606
dB Levels: F(3.12, 109.23) = 53.49; p<0.001Treatment: F(1,35) = 11.32; p=0.002dB Levels x Treatment: F(3.12, 109.23) = 1.34; p=0.266
T-test (Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances): p= 0.770 T-test (Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances): p= 0.861
0
50
100
150
200
250
Control Male 1500ppm Male
Sta
rtle
Res
pons
e (m
V)
0
50
100
150
200
250
Control Female 1500ppm Female
Sta
rtle
Res
pons
e (m
V)
0102030405060708090
100
74dB 78dB 82dB 86dB 90dB
% In
hibi
tion
PN120Control Male1500ppm…
Control: n=21; 1500ppm: n=21 Control: n=20; 1500ppm: n=19
dB Levels: F(2.88, 115.11) = 59.59; p<0.001Treatment: F(1,40) = 9.30; p=0.004dB Levels x Treatment: F(2.88, 115.11) = 2.00; p=0.120
T-test (Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances): p= 0.730
0100200300400500600700800
Control Male 1500ppm Male
Sta
rtle
Res
pons
e (m
V)
0102030405060708090
100
74dB 78dB 82dB 86dB 90dB
% In
hibi
tion
PN120Control Female1500ppm Female
dB Levels: F(2.82, 104.17) = 57.96; p<0.001Treatment: F(1,37) = 0. 02; p=0.878dB Levels x Treatment: F(2.82, 104.17) = 0.61; p=0.597
0
100
200
300
400
500
Control Female 1500ppm Female
Sta
rtle
Res
pons
e (m
V)
T-test (Two-Sample Assuming Unequal Variances): p= 0.481