Date post: | 02-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | collin-cole |
View: | 213 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Earth Science Environmental Decision-Making
Earth Science Environmental Decision-Making
Pai-Yei Whung, PhDChief Scientist
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
January 5, 2010
2010 ESIP Federation Winter Meeting
Washington, DC
Decision-Making at EPADecision-Making at EPA
• Action Development Process (ADP) – the process EPA uses to prepare and release actions that define the technical and operational details of environmental programs
Decision-Making at EPADecision-Making at EPA
• Decision Types – regulations, policies, voluntary
• Accountability – measurable metrics to quantify the success of the result
• Science and Technology - improves decision support tools and delivers data/information systems
Decision-Making StepsDecision-Making Steps
• Earth observation systems & models• Data-to-Information archiving & services• Decision support tool development• Decision making• Assessment of benefits
From observations systems
To societal benefits
Flooding in the MidwestFlooding in the MidwestJUNE RAINFALL
FLOWS
June 14, 2008 Historic Gage Records in 9 States Source: Josh Foster (Center for Clean Air Policy)
TWO500-YEAR FLOODS
IN 15 YEARS (1993 & 2008)
FLOOD FREQUENCY CHANGES10% increase in flow = 2.5 times chance of failureFLOOD FREQUENCY CHANGES10% increase in flow = 2.5 times chance of failure
Source: Derek Booth (Univ. of Washington & Stillwater Science, Inc.)
EPA
Source: Joel Scheraga (EPA)
The Decision-Maker’s VoiceThe Decision-Maker’s Voice
• First Step: engage relevant Users (decision-makers) to learn about what they do and what could help them do it better
• In Between: check-in with Users on a regular basis throughout the data/tool development process
• Last Step: feedback from the Users on whether decision-making improved and the anticipated impacts/benefits were realized
The Spectrum of UsersThe Spectrum of Users
• Earth observation system scientists and modelers
• IT/IM experts and service providers• Environmental process modelers & researchers• Policy makers & environmental managers• Public officials, advocacy groups and the public
User requirements well known
Not aware that observational requirements are even needed
• Began in 1997• Diverse stakeholder community
– Federal, state, provincial, tribal and local air agencies (120+)
– Scientific and health research organizations (15+)– Media and public outreach groups (30+)
• Education and outreach• Substantial growth and data exchange
1997
2007
120+ State and 120+ State and Local Air Local Air Agencies Agencies
ObservationsObservations
Forecasts Forecasts
AIRNowAIRNowData Data
Management Management CenterCenter
InternetInternet
MediaMedia
DecisionDecisionMakers Makers
and and PublicPublic
Data Data
Maps and Maps and Forecasts Forecasts
About AIRNowAbout AIRNow
• Real-time, hourly maps and data
• Forecasts (300+ cities)• News stories, e.g.
wildfires• Web cams (air quality)• Seasonal air
comparisons
AIRNow ProductsAIRNow Products
It’s not just a system, it’s a community• Annual conference• Regional cooperation• Daily interaction with stakeholders• Support during air quality events
AIRNow’s “Human Side”AIRNow’s “Human Side”
• Leveraging state, local, and federal resources by collecting and distributing data back to partners, as well as to media outlets
Lessons from AIRNow….Lessons from AIRNow….
•Community is KEY – 40% technology, 60% people
•The public wants environmental information, but depends upon the community to interpret it
•The community provides the context of the data for the public
A vision of GEOSS for Air Quality Decision-Makers
A vision of GEOSS for Air Quality Decision-Makers
Data Needs
Ambient Meteorology
Emissions Models
Satellite
Decision Makers
Policy maker assessing intercontinental transport
AQ manager assessing an exceptional event
Public planning activities today and tomorrow
Decision-makers depend on common observations and data
THE SPECTRUM OF USERSTHE SPECTRUM OF USERS
• Earth observation system scientists and modelers
• IT/IM experts and service providers• Environmental process modelers & researchers• Policy Makers & Environmental managers• Public officials, advocacy groups and the Public
User requirements well known
Not aware that observational requirements are even needed
NOVICE USERS
The “Novice” UserThe “Novice” User
• science-to-policy analysts, decision-makers, public officials, & the public
• working/interested in specific issues
• not GEOSS-experienced
• looking for any and all observational data relevant to their issues
• want to easily find it and view it
The “Novice-Friendly” ToolThe “Novice-Friendly” Tool
• Easy to use
• Focus on what the user out of the data/tool
• Components (data/services) need to provide sample data sets for easy viewing geographically
In SummaryIn Summary
• EPA uses environmental data in its own decision-making process and provides data for other decision-makers.
• EPA partners with others (GEOSS) in the delivery of observational and other data to the decision-makers.
• EPA would like to work with “providers” to make environmental data components/ services more user-friendly.