PAC Meeting #4 Review Materials
July 20, 2017
EAT Airport Master Plan
PARALLEL
TAXIWAY SYSTEM
RUNWAY 12-30
EAST SIDE PARALLEL TAXIWAY CONNECTORS – EXISTING AND PLANNED
±1,700’±2,000’±1,500’±1,800’
EXISTING PARALLEL TAXIWAY ‘A’
54
0’
52
7.5
’
54
0’
‘A6’
Remain
‘A5’
Remain
‘A4’
New
‘A3’
Remain
‘A1’
Remain‘A4’
Remove
Former
Runway
Remove
‘A2’
Remove
FAA Taxiway
Connector
Turnoff
Guidance
RUNWAY 12-30
PROPOSED PARALLEL TAXIWAY ‘A’ @ 400’ SEPARATION
EAST SIDE PARALLEL TAXIWAY SYSTEM – EXISTING AND PROPOSED RUNWAY SEPARATION
ILS
EXISTING PARALLEL TAXIWAY:
50’ to 75’ Wide
@ 527.5 to 540’ Separation
From Runway 12-30 Centerline
250’ Taxiway Holdshort
From Runway Centerline5
40
’
NOTE: TAXIWAY CONNECTORS NOT
SHOWN FOR CLUTTER PURPOSES.
54
0’40
0
EXISTING PARALLEL TAXIWAY ‘A’ @ 527.5’ TO 540’ SEPARATION
52
7.5
’
40
0
40
0
PROPOSED PARALLEL TAXIWAY
75’ Wide
Parallel Taxiway
@ 540’ Separation
From Runway 12-30 Centerline
250’ Taxiway Holdshort
From Runway Centerline
PROPOSED WEST-SIDE PARALLEL TAXIWAY (PHASE 3 – DARK BLUE)
EAST SIDE AIRFIELD
WEST SIDE AIRFIELDAssumes
VOR Station
Decommission
Or Relocation
AIRLINE TERMINAL FACILITIES
ALTERNATIVES
Scenario 1: Meet EAT 20-year forecast passenger growth
(60,000 to 95,000 enplaned growth by 2035)
Scenario 2: Introduce Second West-Coast Destination/Airline
(Two-Gate System with 34-Seat Turboprop)
Scenario 3: Introduce Second West-Coast Destination/Airline
(Two-Gate System with 76 to 90-Seat Jets)
Scenario 4: Introduce Low-Cost Charter
(Two-Gate Gate System with 130 to 150-Seat Jet)
AIRLINE PASSENGER TERMINAL BUILDING – AIRLINE EXPANSION SCENARIOS
DERIVED FROM THE AIRLINE FORECAST SCENARIO EVENTS:
BUILDING LAYOUT SCENARIO 2/3 – OPTION 4
AIRLINE APRON
VEHICLE CURBSIDE
BUILDING LAYOUT SCENARIO 4 – OPTION 5
AIRLINE APRON
VEHICLE CURBSIDE
BUILDING LAYOUT SCENARIO 2/4 – OPTION 6
AIRLINE APRON
VEHICLE CURBSIDE
MATRIX COMPARISON – TERMINAL BUILDING SCENARIOS
Facility Component / Factors
Scenario Passenger Demand Levels Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6
Existing Airport Building
Airline Forecast Scenario Scenario 1 Scenario 2 Scenario 3 Scenario 2/3 Scenario 4 Scenario 2/4
Forecast Airline-Passenger Building Scenario (SF) 26,500 SF 29,200 SF 31,900 SF 30,000 SF 33,300 SF 33,300 SF
Proposed Building Size (SF) 19,000 SF 20,600 SF 26,800 SF 25,500 SF 31,100 SF 31,050 SF
Building Size Per 20,150 SF Fire Wall Code Threshold Less Less Greater Greater Greater Greater
Building Exterior Expansion - Number of Sides 1 - W 2 - W / N 2 - W / N 2 - W / N 3 - W / N / S 2 - W / N
Requires Remote Building Relocation Yes Yes No No No No
Building Features Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6
Number of Airlines / Departure Gates 1 / 1 2 / 2 2 / 2 2 / 2 3 / 2 3 / 2
Expands to 2-Story Building (Yes or No) No No Yes No Yes Yes
Passenger Loading (Ground or Bridge) Ground Ground Ground Ground Ground Ground
Provides New Building Curbside Entry Point No No Yes No No No
Provides Flip-Flow Building Entry No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Requires Fire Sprinklers No No TBD TBD TBD TBD
19,000 SF (Single Story: 90' x 260' / 92 Departure Lounge Seats)
Alternative Options
MATRIX COMPARISON – TERMINAL BUILDING SCENARIOS (CONTINUED)
Individual Building Components / Factors Bldg. Trigger Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6
Airline Operating Area Expansion (Yes or No) Essential Reconfigure Yes Yes Reconfigure Yes Yes
Expands Airline Ticket Counter Essential No No Yes No Relocated Relocated
Expands Airline Office Area (Net Area) LOS Yes Yes Yes Reconfigure Relocated Relocated
Expands Airline Baggage Make-Up LOS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Expands Airline Passenger Tickekting/Counter Queing LOS No No Yes No Relocated Yes
Passenger Departure Lounge Expansion (Yes or No) Essential No Net Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Passenger Departure Lounge (Total SF) Essential 2,150 2,400 2,550 2,050 4,200 2,050
Passenger Departure Lounge (Total Seats) Essential ±90 Seats ±100 Seats 110-124 Seats 120 Seats 160 Seats 120 Seats
Bathrooms Upgraded to ADA Compliance Per Code Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Outbound Baggage Improvements LOS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Airline Conveyor to Tug (Yes or No) LOS Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
TSA Baggage Screening - By Hand or Equipment Scanner LOS Either Either Either Either Either Either
TSA Passenger Screening and Office Area (Yes or No) LOS / Standards No No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Expands TSA Passenger Screening Queing LOS No No No No Yes Yes
Accommodates TSA SSCP Equipment Upgrades TSA Standards No No No No Yes Yes
Meets TSA Checkpoint Guidelines for Space & Layout TSA Standards No No No No Yes Yes
MATRIX COMPARISON – TERMINAL BUILDING SCENARIOS (CONTINUED)
Individual Building Components / Factors Bldg. Trigger Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Option 4 Option 5 Option 6
Airport Administration / Operations LOS ±3,000 SF ±3,000 SF 3,900 SF 4,200 SF 6,150 SF 6,150 SF
Accommodates Administrative Staff LOS Exterior Bldg. Exterior Bldg. Marginal Marginal Yes Yes
Accommodates Law Enforcement Staff (LEO) LOS Exterior Bldg. Exterior Bldg. Marginal Marginal Yes Yes
Expands Airport Storage Area LOS Exterior Bldg. Exterior Bldg. Marginal Marginal Yes Yes
Inbound Baggage Improvements LOS No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Baggage Claim - Manual or Conveyor Devise LOS Hand Transfer Conveyor Conveyor Conveyor Conveyor Conveyor
Expands Passenger Baggage Claim/ Meeter-Greeter Area LOS No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Expands Tenant Office-Counters / Area (Yes or No) LOS No No No No Yes Yes
Expands Restrooms - Non-Secured Area (Yes or No) Per Code No No No Yes Yes Yes
Expands Storage Area Yes No No No Yes Yes
Constructability & Costs N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Economic Value & Financial Return N/A TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD TBD
Note: Building reconfiguration triggers compliance with federal ADA requirements (bathroom facilities).
Note: 20,150 SF is maximum building area without requiring fire suppression systems; firewall separation possible for expanding adjoinging building areas beyond 20,150 SF.
Note: 46,000 SF is allowable building area with sprinkler system.
Note: Future timeframe for implementation for TSA passenger or baggage screening equipment upgrades are unspecified.
- ALTERNATIVES -
AIRLINE APRON
AIRLINE APRON – EXISTING CONDITIONS
PARKING
POSITION #1
(TURBOPROP)
TERMINAL BUILDING
TOTAL APRON = 95,500 SF
AIRCRAFT MANEUVERING = 87,500 SF
AIRCRAFT PARKING = 55,000 SF
APRON SUPPORT = 8,000 SF
VEHICLES
GA
AP
RO
N
PARALLEL TAXIWAY ‘A’
NON-PARKING AREA
TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA
PARKING
POSITION #2
(TURBOPROP)
Win
gti
p S
ep
ara
tio
n
B-I
I T
OFA
@ 6
5.5
’
GSE STORAGE
3.40%
1.5
0%
C-III TOFA @ 93’
±90’
AIRLINE APRON – EXPANSION OPTION ACAP 3
TERMINAL BUILDING
VEHICLES
GA
AP
RO
N
PARALLEL TAXIWAY ‘A’
NON-PARKING AREA
TAXIWAY SAFETY AREA
Win
gti
p S
ep
ara
tio
n
B-I
I T
OFA
@ 6
5.5
’
GSE STORAGE
PARKING
POSITION #1NARROW
BODY JET
NARROW-BODY JET TYPES:
EMB-190
MD-90 SERIES
B-737 SERIES
EMB-190/195
BOMBARDIER CS-300
- ALTERNATIVES -
AIRLINE AUTO PARKING
Lot and Parking Function2015
(Actual)2020 2025 2030 2035
2015 to 2035
Change
Daily Enplaned Passengers - Peak Month 191 221 253 287 318 127
PARKING SPACES (NO OVERFLOW) 379 340 383 428 470 91
PARKING SPACES (PLUS OVERFLOW) 379 407 458 513 565 186
Short-Term * 45 38 42 47 51 6
Long-Term 235 209 239 271 300 65
Rental Car 69 62 68 74 79 10
Employee/Tenant 30 32 34 37 39 9
Overflow/Special Event 0 66 75 84 95 95
PARKING AREA - SF (NO OVERFLOW) 148,400 170,200 191,500 214,200 234,800 86,400
PARKING AREA - ACRES (NO OVERFLOW) 3.4 3.9 4.4 4.9 5.4 2.0
PARKING AREA - SF (PLUS OVERFLOW) 148,400 201,600 226,900 254,000 279,600 131,200
PARKING AREA - ACRES (PLUS OVERFLOW) 3.4 4.6 5.2 5.8 6.4 3.0
Short-Term * 24,000 25,400 28,600 31,900 34,800 10,800
Long-Term 86,400 98,700 112,900 128,100 142,000 55,600
Rental Car 25,500 30,900 33,800 36,800 39,300 13,800
Employee / Tenant 12,500 15,200 16,200 17,400 18,700 6,200
Overflow / Special Event 0 31,400 35,400 39,800 44,800 44,800
FUTURE AIRLINE AUTO PARKING DEMAND (SPACES AND AREA)
Additional 20-
Year Demand
- Spaces -
Additional 20-
Year Demand
- Area -
AIRLINE AUTO PARKING – OPTION AUTO 1
(RECONFIGURE LOT)
Relocate Rental
Expand Short-
Term
New Livery Lane
Expand Employee
New Entry
AIRLINE AUTO PARKING – OPTION AUTO 2
(RECONFIGURE LOT, ENTRANCE, EXPAND LOT)
Expand Long-Term
Straighten
Entrance / New
Access Point
Expand Employee
Relocate Rental
AIRLINE AUTO PARKING – OPTION AUTO 3
(RECONFIGURE LOT, NEW ENTRANCE, EXPAND LOT, OVERFLOW)
New Circulation
Route
New-Expanded
Long Term
New Overflow
AIRLINE AUTO PARKING – OPTION AUTO 4
(RECONFIGURE LOT, NEW ENTRANCE, EXPAND LOT, OVERFLOW)
New Circulation
Route
New-Expanded
Long Term
/ Rental
New Overflow
COMBINED AIRPORT
OPERATIONS BUILDING (AOB)
ARFF AND SRE
Airport Operations Building (AOB):
The AOB is a single structure to consolidate Airport Rescue
and Fire Fighting (ARFF) and Snow Remove Equipment (SRE)
facilities and staff. The ARFF and SRE share many common
functions, including staff, emergency response, storage, and
vehicle maintenance.
PROPOSED BUILDING ALLOCATION:
ARFF: 5,500 to 7,000 SF
SRE: 18,000 to 22,000 SF
Storage/Materials: 500 SF
Staff Operations: 3,000 to 4,500 SF
TOTAL: 27,000 to 34,000 SF
AOB - EAT RENDERING
EXISTING BUILDING SPACE:
ARFF (3 Bays): 4,050 SF
SRE (Total Structures): 16,150 SF
Storage/Materials: 0 SF
Staff Operations: 1,500 SF
TOTAL: 21,700 SF
AOB FACTORS – EXISTING CONDITIONS
AIRPORT WAY
AIR CARGOSRE
ARFF
RUNWAY BUILDING RESTRICTION LINEGA APRON
Equipment
Stored
Outside
SRE SRESRE
Obsolete
Airport
Ops.
Building
Constrained
SRE Space
and Door
Set Up
Constrained
Door Size
and
Operating
Space
Proximity
of
Overnight
Quarters
Joint
Airport and
Douglas
County
Operations
FBO
Airport
Staffing
of FBO
SRE/ARFF
AOB-A1-1
AOB-A2-1
AOB-A4
AOB-A6
AOB-A5
AOB-A3
AO
B-A
2-2
AOB LAYOUT OPTION – SITE A
AOB BLDG.
FOOTPRINT
±35,000 SF
AOB LAYOUT OPTION – SITE D
PANGBORN AIRPORT
BUSINESS PARK
ALTERNATIVES
- GENERAL AVIATION -
FIXED BASE OPERATOR
(FBO) BUILDING
SITE LAYOUT OPTIONS
EAST-SIDE
Optimize GA
Apron Frontage
SRE Building
Disposition
FBO
AIRPORT WAY Adjacent FBO
Facilities and
Services
GA APRON
100LL
FUEL
TAXIWAY ‘A’
JET-A
FUEL
ARFF
CARGO
GA AIRCRAFT
PARKING
GA HANGARS
T-HANGAR SITE
DISPOSITIONARFF Building
Proximity/Future
Expansion/AOB
Consolidation to
Alternate Airfield
Site
SRE
Future Aircraft
Fueling Storage
Locations
Existing FBO
Building Factors:
- Condition
- Hangar Size
- Door Height
- Amenities
- Aesthetics
Long-Term
T-Hangar
Disposition and
Redevelopment
Long-Term
Hangar
Disposition
PANGBORN FLIGHT CENTER - EXISTING SITE FACTORS
Future GA Aircraft
Parking Needs
(Aircraft Type)
REPLACEMENT FBO
BUILDING (±3,500 SF)
F
FF
FBO BUILDING/HANGAR OPTION – FBO A-1
AIRPORT WAY
CARGOFUTURE T-HANGAR
DISPOSITION
TB HR
GA AUTO
(FUTURE)
SRE
ARFF
HR
HR
HR
RAMP
(F)
RUNWAY BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE
TBSRE
F
F
F
FBO BUILDING/HANGAR OPTION – FBO A-3
HR
F
GA AUTO
(FUTURE)
AIRPORT WAY
CARGOFUTURE T-HANGAR
DISPOSITION
ARFF
AUTO
OVERFLOW
RAMP (FUTURE)
FUTURE
AOB
RUNWAY BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE
TB
F
FBO BUILDING/HANGAR OPTION – FBO A-5
HR
F F
GA AUTO
(FUTURE)
AIRPORT WAY
CARGOFUTURE T-HANGAR
DISPOSITION
ARFF
SRE
RAMP (FUTURE)
RUNWAY BUILDING RESTRICTION LINE
GA T-HANGAR DISPOSITION – SUB OPTION - GA T-HANGAR REMOVAL SITE OPTION
FUTURE T-HANGAR
DISPOSITION
SITE ADVANTAGES
Large Paved Surface
Visibility (Airfield & Landside)
Proximity to Paved Apron
Existing Utilities
Strong Commercial Potential
SITE DISADVANTAGES
T-Hangar Removal Timeframe
Vehicle Access and Parking
Proximity to GA Hangars
Proximity to Airline Operations
POTENTIAL REDEVELOPMENT
Aircraft Parking (Large GA)
Aircraft Parking (Overflow)
GA FBO Building
GA Tenant Service Providers
GA Aircraft Deicing Pad
Aircraft Fuel Storage
Airport Operations Facilities
Potential Air Cargo Site
Flexible Development Area
Note: Resist Redevelopment
for replacement T-Hangars
EAST-SIDE
GA SMALL AIRCRAFT
HANGARS
LAYOUT OPTIONS
GENERAL AVIATION HANGAR TYPES
EXECUTIVE
(E)
BOX
(B)
T-HANGAR / SHADE
COMMON /
CORPORATE
(C)
Size: 10,000 to 30,000 SF
Stored Aircraft: 2 to 4 Aircraft (Corporate-Class Turbine)
Use: Aircraft Storage, Workshop, Office Space, Potential Public Use
Note: This information is intended to reflect a range of common industry hangar sizes and uses.
Size: 6,000 to 15,000 SF
Stored Aircraft: 1 to 3 Aircraft (Piston-Turbine Business-Class/Helicopter)
Use: Aircraft Storage, Small Office Space
Size: 3,000 to 6,000 SF
Stored Aircraft: 1 to 2 Aircraft (Piston-Class)
Use: Aircraft Storage, Small Workshop
Size: 8,000 to 12,000 SF (Closed Stacked or Nested / Open Shade)
Stored Aircraft: 6 to 10 Aircraft (Single/Twin Piston)
Use: Aircraft Storage, Workbench
GENERAL AVIATION HANGAR TYPES
Future hangars sites are required for 1) new based aircraft owners, 2) tenant expansion, and 3)
replacement for obsolete or removed hangars. Nearly all future based aircraft will be stored in hangars.
The following identifies general hangar siting considerations:
• Ideally, hangars should be developed in a linear, modular manner. Hangar locations should be
centralized or grouped by type and function, and aircraft sizes-categories (piston, turboprops, jets,
rotor), to promote efficient airfield and landside access, and constructed along existing flightlines as
possible, to minimize costs associated with expanded paved areas, drainage, utilities, auto parking and
secured access.
• Hangar orientation should consider weather conditions, and provide adequate drainage with minimal
slope differential, especially in front of hangar doors.
• Hangars must be constructed beyond the runway and taxiway safety areas, navigational critical areas,
remain beyond visibility line-of-sights, and be regulated by height so as to not encroach imaginary
airspace surfaces. Hangar buildings should be separated to meet, at minimum, FAA taxilane width and
safety area distances in providing sufficient access, maneuvering and ramp space.
E
EX
EC
EX
EC
FORMER RUNWAY 7-25 - AIRCRAFT PARKING AREA
T-H
AN
GA
R / S
HA
DE
EAST GA HANGAR OPTION – EXISTING (HANGAR IN-FILL AND RETAIN TAXIWAY ‘F’)
TAXIWAY ‘F’
LARGE
EXECUTIVE
EAST GA HANGAR OPTION – HGR A (ACQUIRE AIRPORT PROPERTY)
EXISTING HANGARS
T-H
AN
GA
R / S
HA
DE
T-H
AN
GA
R / S
HA
DE
EX
EB
EX
EB
EX
EB
EX
EB
ROAD ACCESS- OPTION A (FUTURE)E
XE
BE
XE
B
FUTURE TAXIWAY
FORMER RUNWAY 7-25 - AIRCRAFT PARKING AREA
Note: Site considered for future removal of the four T-Hangars from the main general aviation apron.
T-H
AN
GA
R/S
HA
DE
BB
TAXIWAY (FUTURE)
T-H
AN
GA
R/S
HA
DE
EX
E
BB
EX
E
T-H
AN
GA
R/S
HA
DE
EXISTING HANGARS
RO
AD
AC
CE
SS
ROAD (FUTURE)
EAST GA HANGAR OPTION – HGR B (BEYOND FORMER CROSSWIND)
TAXIWAY ‘F’
FORMER RUNWAY 7-25 - FUTURE TAXIWAY
Note: Site considered for future removal of the four T-Hangars from the main general aviation apron.
EAST GA HANGAR OPTION – HGR C (SOUTH OF FORMER CROSSWIND)
T-HANGAR (R)
T-HANGAR (R)
T-HANGAR (R)
BBEXEB EXE
RO
AD
OP
TIO
N (F
UT
UR
E)
ROAD OPTION (FUTURE)ASOS
STATION
FORMER RUNWAY 7-25 – FUTURE TAXIWAY
Note: Site considered for future removal of the four T-Hangars from the main general aviation apron.
FORMER RUNWAY - AIRCRAFT PARKING / CONVERT TO FUTURE TAXIWAY
UN
SP
EC
IFIE
D
T-HANGAR/SHADE
BB
B
BB
B
T-HANGAR/SHADE T-HANGAR/SHADE
B
T-HANGAR/SHADE
B
TAXIWAY ‘F’ (REMAIN OPEN)
EAST GA HANGAR OPTION – HGR D (HANGAR IN-FILL, SHADE HANGARS, RETAIN TAXIWAY ‘F’)
T-H
AN
GA
R
UN
SP
EC
IFIE
D
EX
EE
XE
BB
B
BB
B
T-H
AN
GA
R
T-H
AN
GA
R
BB
B
BB
BB
BB
BB
B
EAST GA HANGAR OPTION – HGR D (EXISTING IN-FILL, MAXIMIZE SPACE, CLOSE TAXIWAY ‘F’)
TAXIWAY ‘F’ (CLOSE)
FORMER RUNWAY - AIRCRAFT PARKING / CONVERT TO FUTURE TAXIWAY
TAX
ILA
NE
TAX
ILA
NE
TAX
ILA
NE
TAX
ILA
NE
TAX
ILA
NE
CORPORATE CORPORATE
RESERVE FOR FUTURE LARGE CORPORATE GENERAL AVIATION LOTS
TAXIWAY ‘B’
EAST GA HANGAR OPTION – WEST SIDE (CONDITION OF USFS WINTHROP)
AIRPORT BUSINESS PARK
TAXIWAY ‘B’ EXTENDED
AUTO PARKING
EAST-SIDE
GA APRON PARKING
LAYOUT OPTIONS
GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT PARKING TYPES
Type: Business Jet
Parking Area: ±6,000 SF (60’ x 100’)
Aircraft Weight: 16,000 to 90,000 Pounds
Pilot/Passengers: 5 to 12
Note: This information is intended to reflect a range of common industry aircraft sizes.
Type: Single/Twin Turboprop
Parking Area: ±4,500 SF (50’ x 90’)
Weight: 12,000 to 22,000 Pounds
Pilot/Passengers: 3 to 8
Type: Single/Twin-Piston
Parking Area: ±2,500 SF (40’ x 60’)
Aircraft Weight: 3,000 to 8,000 Pounds
Pilot/Passengers: 2 to 5
Type: Helicopter:
Parking Area: ±3,600 SF (60’ x 60’)
Aircraft Weight: 2,000 to 15,000 Pounds
Pilot/Passengers: 2 to 6
GENERAL AVIATION AIRCRAFT PARKING – GA APRON 1 (TWY ‘A’ RELOCATION )
F
FUEL
FEDEX
CARGOUPS
CARGO
LONG-TERM
TIE-DOWN
(MIX)
USFS
OVERFLOWFBO (JET)
SRE
FBO ARFF
CARGO
GA HANGARS
FBO (TURBINE)
FBO
(PISTON)
POTENTIAL
AIRCRAFT
PARKING
(OVERFLOW)
GA
ROTOR
CROSSWIND/TURF RUNWAY
ALTERNATIVES
OPTIONS FOR FORMER
CROSSWIND AS FUTURE
PAVED RUNWAY
MATRIX TABLE – PAVED CROSSWIND RUNWAY OPTIONS
Facility Component Factor
FAA Runway Length (FAA Standards)
FAA Runway Design Category
FAA Runway Protection Zone (RPZ)
Assessment Option P-A Option P-B Option P-C Option P-D Option P-E Option P-F
Length Benefit (% of 3,400' FAA Length) 3,400' 3,400' 2,500' (73%) 2,500' (73%) ±1,800' (52%) ±900' (26%)
Length Benefit - Annual Fights (% Total) 2,150 2,150 1,600 (75%) 1,600 (75%) 1,100 (50%) 800 (35%)
Occupied Airport Aeronautical Property (Acres) 65 Acres± 65 Acres± 55 Acres± 55 Acres± 48 Acres± 40 Acres±
Airfield Configuration, Access and Geometry Rwy 12-30
Taxiway Access/Geometry (Turnaround Needed)* Yes No Rwy 12-30 No Rwy 12-30 New Entry
Runway 12-30 and Taxiway 'A' Crossing Yes Yes Yes Yes West End No
Airspace Imaginary Surfaces
Accommodates RPZ On Airport Property Partial Leased Area Partial
Compatibility - Airport Operations / Aircraft Parking Rwy AC Parking Rwy AC Parking Rwy AC Parking Rwy AC Parking West End Partial West End
Compatibility - On-Airport Land Use / Visibility Zone
Compatibility - Off-Airport (Noise, Overflight) RPZ RPZ
Environmental Considerations RPZ RPZ
Constructability / Costs Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded Airport Funded
Economic Value & Financial Return Cost/Use Cost/Use Cost/Use Cost/Use Cost/Use Benefit/Use
Facility Factors
3,400' x 60'
250' x 1,000’ x 450' (Visual Runway)
A/B-I - Small Aircraft Only (Single and Twin-Piston Aircraft)
OPTIONS FOR TURF
CROSSWIND
SITE LOCATIONS AND LAYOUTS
MATRIX EXHIBIT – NON-PAVED TURF CROSSWIND RUNWAY OPTIONS
Sailplane Hangar and
Apron Location
Taxiway Considerations
Former Glider Landing Strip
Does not Comply with FAA
Separation and Setback
Standards:
- Twy Separation (150’)
- Rwy Separation (700’)
- Primary Surface (250’)
- Hold Position (125’)
- Aircraft Parking (125’)
- Runway Safety Area
- Runway Object Free Area
Off Airport Property and
Residence Location(s)NON-PAVED TURF RUNWAY
REQUIRED TO MEET FAA
DESIGN STANDARDS
MATRIX TABLE – NON-PAVED TURF CROSSWIND OPTIONS (LIGHT SPORT AIRCRAFT)Facility Component Factor
Runway Length (Former Turf Length)
Aircraft Category
FAA Runway Design Category
FAA Runway Protection Zone (RPZ)
Assessment Option T-A Option T-B Option T-C Option T-D Option T-E Option T-F
Turf Strip On Existing Airport Property Yes Yes Partial Partial Partial No
Turf RPZ On Existing Airport Property Yes Partial Partial No South End No
Airfield Configuration, Access and Geometry Former Runway
Aligned with Prevailing Winds
Taxiway Access Entry and Geometry Reconfigure Turf Access Turf Access Turf or Paved Turf or Paved Hangar Access?
Airspace Geometry-Design Former Runway Parallel Primary
Compatibility - Closed Runway 7-25 as 'Paved Runway' Not Co-Existent Requires 700' Conflicts Conflicts 700' Separation 700' Separation
Compatibility - Closed Runway 7-25 as 'Aircraft Parking' Not Co-Existent Requires 250'+ Requires 250'+ Conflicts
Compatibility - On-Airport Land Use / Visibility Zone ASOS ? Relocate ASOS ASOS/Hangars Visibility Visibility Remote
Compatibility - Airport Operations Former Runway
Compatibility - Off-Airport (Noise, Overflight) Former Runway Home Overflight Overflight(s) Land Purchase Land Purchase Land Purchase
Environmental Considerations Former Runway Partial RPZ Land Purchase Land Purchase Land Purchase Land Purchase
Constructability / Costs Turf or Paved ? Airport Cost Airport Cost Airport Cost Airport Cost Airport Cost
Economic Value & Financial Return Functional Use Best Use ? Land Revenues
250' x 1,000’ x 450' (Visual Runway)
Facility Factors
A/B-I - Small Aircraft Only (Light and Sport Aircraft)
±1,000' x 60' (Non-Paved Turf)
Light Sport Aircraft (Maximum Gross Takeoff Not Greater Than 1,320 Pounds) / Sailplane Landings
NON-PAVED TURF CROSSWIND RUNWAY OPTION T-B
REQUIRES FAA COORDINATION – RPZ BEYOND EXISTING AIRPORT PROPERTY
NOTE: REQUIRES FAA AIRSPACE FOR FINAL LAYOUT AND LENGTH DETERMINATION