Date post: | 11-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | noreen-day |
View: | 216 times |
Download: | 0 times |
EBA / TACTIC Workgroup ReportMaria E. Fernandez, PhD and Pat Dolan
Mullen, DrPHLatinos in Network for Cancer Control
University of Texas School of Public Health
CPCRN Signature Project
Development of a web-based tool to increase the use of EBAs in communities (TACTIC)
• EBA Resources and Training Inventory
• CDC Conference - Audience Participation
• EBA Partner Needs Assessment Survey
• Partner Validation Interviews
• ASPO presentations on Cancer Control Planners’ views of EBAs & Development of TACTIC
• R25E Grant submission
EBA Resources and Inventory
• Provide a list of resources - cancer prevention and control EBAs with descriptions of particular features of each resource. – focus; cost; language level; availability and
helpfulness, usability (ease of navigation, links to other resources); types of information about specific programs.
• Selected major resources sponsored by federal government agencies, voluntary organizations and foundations.
CDC Conference
• Participants– 63 attendees of EBA session
• Methods– Speakers asked questions
•Audience characteristics•Use of resources•Opinions about EBAs
– Audience responded w/ hand-held devices
CDC Conference Results
• 2/3 participants spend >50% of their time planning & implementing programs
• Use of resources varies – 35% use R-TIPs– 59% use Community Guide– 72% use P.L.A.N.E.T.
• Most find EBAs challenging – 32% agree that they are easy to find & get– 24% agree they are easy to adapt
CDC Conference Audience Response
• Many cancer control program planners feel pressure from funders to use EBAs,
• Difficult finding and implementing EBAs
• Unaware of and/or not using existing online resources
• It is important to better understand how to further support practitioners in finding, implementing, and adapting EBAs.
CPCRN Partner Survey
• Each CPCRN surveyed > 30 partners
• Survey available on-line & on paper– Key survey domains included
• Participant characteristics• Cancer control program development process• Perceptions of evidence-based programs• Use of Guide, PLANET, R-TIPs• Training needs to adapt & implement evidence-
based programs
• Participants offered $20 Amazon gift card
Partner Survey Participants
• 282 completed survey
• 240 were retained for analyses– These participants had implemented
programs in the past year
• Most participants– Work at local level (65%)– For organizations with < 50 staff (57%)– Have high-speed internet access (92%)
Sources of Cancer Control Programs
69
68
69
0 20 40 60 80 100
AdaptedProgram
UsedProgram
DevelopedOwn
Program
% Doing Activity in Past Year
• Participants’ reasons for using/adapting existing programs– 53% - scientific
evidence the program works
– 44% - free or low cost
– 43% - easy to implement
Participants could choose > 1 response
Use of Resources
48
13
36
28
65
22
49
43
0 20 40 60 80
Any of theabove
R-TIPs
P.L.A.N.E.T.
Guide
Percent
Ever heard of
Ever used
80-85% of those who had ever used these resources rated them as somewhat or very useful
Top Perceived Training Needs
• Among respondents never using resources– Find & secure
additional resources (81%)
– Assess & use current resources (64%)
– Obtain program materials (63%)
– Develop implementation & evaluation plan (62%)
• Among respondents using 1+ resources– Find & secure additional
resources (70%)
– Adapt program/materials for cultural appropriateness (70%)
– Identify which program aspects can be changed (65%)
– Develop implementation & evaluation plan (65%)
Use of Resources
48
13
36
28
65
22
49
43
0 20 40 60 80
Any of theabove
R-TIPs
P.L.A.N.E.T.
Guide
Percent
Ever heard of
Ever used
80-85% of those who had ever used these resources rated them as somewhat or very useful
• Collaboration through the CPCRN Consortium – CPCRN Steering Committee as
Advisory Com; great input throughout proposal development
• From the Community– Current partners participating in the
production of TACTIC and dissemination planning
Tailored Assistance for Choosing Tested Cancer
Control Tools in Communities (TACTIC)
TACTIC Screenshots
Partner Validation Interviews
• Conducted face to face interviews with selected community partners
• Feedback and suggestions about the practical utility and relevance of the tool and provide suggestion for modifying program objectives, modules, or content areas.
Tailored Assistance for Choosing Tested Cancer
Control Tools in Communities (TACTIC)• Sent R25E application to NCI last week –
Thank you, Larissa!
• Collaboration throughout the CPCRN Consortium– Texas: Lead (Mullen, Fernandez, Bartholomew)
– Emory: Evaluation (Kegler, Escoffery, Carvalho, Swan)
– Wash U/SLU: Interface (Kreuter, Pfeiffer, Ross)
– Coord Ctr/Mass, Morehouse, UCLA, UNC, UW: Collaborators, Co-I’s (Bowen, Hannon, Glenn,
Mistry, Reese, Ribisl, Williams)
– CPCRN Steering Committee PI’s: Advisory Group (Bastani, Blumenthal, Glanz, Melvin, Sorenson, Taylor)
• Collaboration through the CPCRN Consortium – CPCRN Steering Committee as
Advisory Committee -great input throughout proposal development
• From the Community– Current partners participating in the
production of TACTIC and dissemination planning
Tailored Assistance for Choosing Tested Cancer
Control Tools in Communities (TACTIC)
ASPO Presentations•“Cancer control planners’
views of evidence-based approaches (EBAs),”
•“Development of a Computer-Based Training and Planning Tool for Increasing Use of Evidence-Based Approaches (EBAs) for Cancer Control,”
Agenda•Further development of
TACTIC•Future Collaboration
Pathways for the Progression of TACTIC in Interim
How do we continue to collaborate to maintain
momentum?
PresentationPapers
Spin off grant proposalsTemplate Development
Papers•Partner survey paper –
Hannon et al.•TACTIC Development –
Fernandez et al.• Inventory of resources –
Mullen et al.•Framework for identifying
“active ingredients” of interventions – Bartholomew, Mullen, Fernandez et al.
Presentations•ASPO March 2008•CDC Chronic Disease
Conference•SBM•CDC Cancer Conference
Spinoff Grant Proposals•Emory – EBA Measurement
- R03(?)
Template Development
Merging of Minds – EBA and
Dissemination Workgroup
How can we work together?