+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ec201 week 1 2012

ec201 week 1 2012

Date post: 10-Feb-2018
Category:
Upload: alamchowdhury
View: 215 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 56

Transcript
  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    1/56

    EC 201 Lent Term

    Week 1

    General Competitive Equilibrium

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    2/56

    General

    CompetitiveEquilibrium

    How do competitive markets aggregate consumer andproducer choices into equilibrium prices and quantities?

    How does activity on one competitive market affect activityon another? For example, how do our conclusions about the

    effects of taxing a single-market economy carry over to two-market economies?

    What properties do competitive equilibria have? Forexample, when are competitive markets efficient?2

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    3/56

    Example

    In 2007, UK government increased excise duty on bottle of wine(paid by seller) by 4p whilst keeping tax on spirits constant

    What should happen to wine and spirits prices?

    Partial equilibrium analysis analyses each market in isolation. Itpredicts: no change in spirits price because tax on spiritsunchanged; wine price increases from p to p

    3

    pwine

    Old Supply

    New Supply

    4p

    Demandqwine

    pp

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    4/56

    General-Equilibrium Effects

    Because wine and spirits are substitutes, when tax increase causeswine price to rise to p, demand for spirits rises, increasing themarket price of spirits

    Because spirits market price increases, demand for wine increases

    (again since wine and spirits substitutes), causing its market priceto rise to p>p

    4

    pwineOld Supply

    New Supply

    4p

    Old Demandqwine

    New Demand

    pp

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    5/56

    Where Does it End?Now that the price of wine is p, demand for spiritsrises, causing its price to rise, increasing demand forwine and causing its price to rise to p>p>p. And soon and so forth

    By analysing equilibrium in the two marketssimultaneously, general equilibrium allows economiststo account for the interplay between different markets,solving for equilibrium prices in the two markets

    5

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    6/56

    The simplest economy to analyse is one

    where people merely exchange goods that

    they already own

    Our market model of exchange economies provides asimplified representation of markets from the London StockExchange to international trade to village bazaars to allocatingcourses to students at Harvard Business School

    Like all models, it is too simple to incorporate all theimportant features of these or other trading environments. Yetit provides important insights into economic behaviour

    6

    Exchange Economies

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    7/56

    Overview

    In an exchange economy, each consumer begins withan endowment of the various different goods in theeconomy

    She trades her goods endowment for the bestallocation that she can afford given that endowmentand market prices

    She consumes her allocation

    The end

    7

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    8/56

    Formal Description of Exchange

    Economy

    N2 Different Consumers (Traders) L2 Different Goods in Economy Consumer iendowedwith amount e1i0 of Good 1,

    e2i0 of Good 2, etc. We mostly use two goods in thiscourse

    Consumer ihas utility function ui

    NB We use superscripts for people and subscripts for goodsWe also use ei to refer to the vector of Consumer is endowment of

    goods, i.e. ei=(e1i,e2i)

    8

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    9/56

    Exchange Economies without

    Externalities

    Absent production (firms), the N consumers simplyexchange (trade) their endowments of the L goods

    in the economy

    (Until further notice), we assume that eachconsumer cares only about her own privateconsumption; when Consumer i consumes the

    bundle of goods (x1i,x2i), her utility ui depends solely

    upon (x1i,x2i): ui(x1i,x2i). (In particular, Person is utilitydoes not depend upon Person js consumption, nor doesPerson i care about money except insofar as it allowsher to consume more, e.g., there is no saving)

    9

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    10/56

    Competitive Budget Sets Consumers budget sets depend on fixed market

    prices for the L goods in the economy, p1,p2,...0

    We write p (without subscript) to mean the pricevector: p=(p1,p2,...)

    Each consumer faces the same, fixedmarket prices!

    That is, consumers take market prices as given anddo not enjoy quantity discounts or other forms of

    non-linear prices, nor can they bargain over or

    otherwise affect prices

    Budget sets also depend upon endowments

    Different consumers may have differentendowments! 10

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    11/56

    Describing Budget Sets

    Consumer ican afford to consume any bundle of

    goods (x1i,x2i)0such that

    p1x1i+p2x2ip1e1i+p2e2i

    Cost of bundle (x1i,x2i)at market pricesValue of endowment(e1i,e2i)at market prices

    We can think of this as consumer first selling all herendowment at market prices and using the money she

    raises to buy consumption goods (e.g., poultry farmersells all chickens at market price before buying a

    consumption bundle consisting of chickens and goats)

    11

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    12/56

    Goods-EndowmentBudget Set

    ei Budget Set

    Good 1

    Good 2

    e1i

    e2i

    Slope = -p1/p2

    12

    e2i+(p1/p2)e1i

    e1i+(p2/p1)e2i

    Goods endowment

    As usual, you can work out intercepts on two axes by

    calculating how much of each good the consumer can afford

    when she buys only that good

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    13/56

    Features of Budget Set

    Budget set depends upon the relative prices p1/p2 butnot upon the absolute prices p1and p2

    Each consumers budget set passes through her goodsendowment: regardless of what it is, the consumer canalways afford to consume her endowment. She can

    does this either by selling endowment and buying it

    back (as prices being fixed and common to all

    consumers means that buying price = selling price) orsimply by not trading at all

    13

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    14/56

    Money as Unit of Account

    In economy without money as such, we use moneysimply as a unit of account

    Prices in general equilibrium are really relative prices,how much one good costs in terms of another

    For example, consider economy with only two goods,chickens and goats. Suppose that each chicken costs kgoats. Someone endowed with cchickens andggoatshas an endowment with value ofg+kcgoats.

    Alternatively, that same endowment is worthg/k+cchickens. Whether prices are quoted in chicken orgoat units does not affect economic behaviour

    14

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    15/56

    Uncompensated Demand In consumer theory, Consumer is uncompensated

    demand (x1i

    (p1,p2;mi

    ), x2i

    (p1,p2;mi

    )) maximises her utilityui(x1,x2) subject to budget constraint defined by prices(p1,p2) and wealth mi: (x1i(p1,p2;mi), x2i(p1,p2;mi)) solvesmaxui(x1,x2) subject to (s.t.) p1x1+p2x2 mi

    In exchange economy, consumers uncompensateddemand (x1i(p1,p2;e1i, e2i), x2i(p1,p2;e1i, e2i)) maximisesutility ui(x1,x2) subject to budget constraint defined byprices (p1,p2) and goods endowment ei:

    (x1i(p1,p2;e1i, e2i), x2i(p1,p2;e1i, e2i)) solves

    maxui(x1,x2) s.t. p1x1+p2x2 p1e1i+p2e2i

    15

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    16/56

    Demand with Goods Endowment

    ei Budget Set

    Good 1

    Good 2

    e1i

    e2i

    Slope = -p1/p2

    16

    x1i(p;ei)

    x2i(p;ei)

    Indifference curves

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    17/56

    Excess Demand

    We call xji(p;ei)-ejiConsumer is excess demandforgood j=1,2, the difference between what she

    consumes and her endowment

    If xji(p;ei)-eji>0, then Consumer iis a net consumerof Goodj

    If xji(p;ei)-eji

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    18/56

    Excess Demand with Goods

    Endowment

    ei

    Good 1

    Good 2

    e1i

    e2i

    Slope = -p1/p2

    18

    x1i(p;ei)

    x2i(p;ei)

    is Excess Demand Good 2

    is Excess Supply Good 1

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    19/56

    Change in Utility from Price

    Change

    ei

    Good 1

    Good 2

    e1i

    e2i

    new prices

    19

    When i supplies Good 1, she benefits when its price rises:

    at new prices she can afford old bundle (and hence utility)

    and may be able to afford a bundle with higher utility

    old prices

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    20/56

    Change in Utility from Price

    Change

    ei

    Good 1

    Good 2

    new prices

    20

    When i supplies Good 1, she may even benefit when its

    price falls if that leads her to supply Good 2 instead

    old pricese2i

    e1i

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    21/56

    Change in Utility from Price

    Change

    ei

    Good 1

    Good 2

    e1i

    e2inew prices

    21

    However, the more usual case is that the utility of a

    supplier of Good 1 falls when its price falls

    old prices

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    22/56

    Effect of Price Change on Demand

    with Goods Endowment

    Notice that with a goods endowment, demand for agood can rise when its price rises even when it is a

    normal good (unlike consumer theory with money

    endowment, where only inferior goods can be Giffen)

    In our first example of a price change, both goods arenormal, yet when the price of Good 1 rises, the

    consumer consumes more of it. The reason is that a

    supplier of Good 1 becomes wealthier when its pricerises, so the income effect works in the opposite

    direction than you are accustomed

    22

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    23/56

    Market Excess Demand

    The market excess demand for good j=1,2 at prices p is

    the sum of all N consumers excess demands forthat good:i=1,2,...,N(xji(p;ei)-eji)

    When i=1,2,...,N(xji(p;ei)-eji)>0, then there is excessdemandfor Goodj at prices p

    When i=1,2,...,N(xji(p;ei)-eji)

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    24/56

    Trading in Exchange Economy

    In an exchange economy, Consumer ibegins byowning her endowment and ends by owning anallocation yi=(y1i,y2i)0 that specifies the (non-negative)quantity that she consumes of each of the goods

    An allocation for all N consumers in the economy

    (y11,y21; y12,y22;...;y1N,y2N)

    specifies each consumers consumption of each good

    NB Consumer is demand (x1i(p;ei), x2i(p;ei)) is a function ofprices and endowment, whereas her allocation (y1i,y2i) is aconstant!

    24

    G l C

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    25/56

    General Competitive

    Equilibrium

    A General Competitive (or Walrasian) Equilibrium consistsof a price vectorp= (p1,p2) and allocation (y11,y21;

    y12,y22;...;y1N,y2N) satisfying the following properties:

    1. Utility Maximisation: Each consumer i maximises utility

    within her budget set as defined by the price vector pand her endowment eiby choosing (y1i,y2i); that is,

    (y1i

    ,y2i

    )=(x1i

    (p;ei

    ), x2i

    (p;ei

    ))2.Market Clearing: given the price vector p, supply equals

    demand:i=1,2,...,N(x1i(p;ei)-e1i)= i=1,2,...,N(x2i(p;ei)-e2i) =025

    Leon Walras

    (1834-1910)

    I l i i ilib i

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    26/56

    In a general competitive equilibriu

    of an exchange economy1. Each consumer consumes the bundle of goods within

    her budget set (as defined by her endowment and

    equilibrium prices) that gives her the most utility

    2. Market supply (total endowment) of each goodequals market demand at equilibrium prices. (Strictly

    speaking, we merely need to require that the supply

    of each good be at least as large as its demand: in a

    general competitive equilibrium, there may be somegood whose supply exceeds its demand. You may

    safely ignore this possibility.)

    26

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    27/56

    Equilibrium

    Last term you analysed Nash Equilibrium ingames: in a Nash Equilibrium, no player canimprove her payoffgiven how other playersbehave. In that sense, behaviour is stable

    In a general competitive equilibrium, noconsumer can increase her utilitygiven herendowment and market prices

    27

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    28/56

    Equilibrium Reasoning Like game theory, general-equilibrium theory

    primarily addresses the question of whichcombinations of allocations and prices constitute

    general competitive equilibrium and which do not; it

    typically does not address how the economy reaches

    a general competitive equilibrium

    As general-equilibrium theorists, you should askyourself whether a particular allocation-price

    combination is a general equilibrium rather than how

    it came to be so

    28

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    29/56

    Market Model

    Our notion of general equilibrium is one of many

    possible models of trading

    It makes strong assumptions that all consumers takemarket prices as given

    This assumption most appropriate when eachconsumer is small relative to the market, i.e. when

    there are many traders

    It also assumes that traders know all market pricesand are free to make any trade they wish subject totheir budget set

    29

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    30/56

    Two-Good, Two-Person

    Exchange Economy When the exchange economy consists of

    only two consumers and two goods, we can

    represent it in a two-dimensional diagramknown as the Edgeworth Box

    30

    Oxford Economist Francis Edgeworth

    (1849-1926)

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    31/56

    Endowments

    31

    e=(eA,eB)

    Person As Origin

    e1Ae2A

    e1BPerson Bs Origin

    e2B

    Good 1

    G

    oo

    d

    2

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    32/56

    Dimensions of the Edgeworth Box

    The Edgeworth Box has length e1A+ e1B and heighte2A+ e2B

    Each point in the box corresponds to an allocation,

    yA

    and yB

    , that is non-wasteful:y1A +y1B= e1A +e1B andy2A +y2B= e2A +e2B

    At the SW corner of the box, Person B gets all theresources in the economy; at the NE corner Person

    A does. Movements to NE thus increase PersonAsshare of total resources

    32

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    33/56

    As Utility Rises to NE

    33

    e

    Person A Origin e1A

    e2A

    e1B Person B Origin

    e2B

    Two Indifference Curves

    for Person A

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    34/56

    When more is better for Person A, higher indifferencecurves lie to the NE of lower indifference curves

    Every possible allocation for Person A, yA=(y1A,y2A)0,lies on some indifference curve for Person A, i.e., shehas indifference curves through bundles that lie outside

    the Edgeworth Box in the north or east direction (but

    neither south of the Edgeworth box, where y2A

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    35/56

    Bs Utility Rises to SW

    35

    e

    Person A Origin e1A

    e2A

    e1B Person B Origi

    e2B

    Two Indifference Curves for Person B

    T di A f E d t

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    36/56

    Trading Away from Endowments

    Can Raise Both Peoples Utilities

    36

    e

    Person A e1A

    e2A

    e1B Person B

    e2B

    Mutually Beneficial Trades

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    37/56

    Prices in the Edgeworth Box

    37

    e

    Person A e1A

    e2A

    e1B Person B

    e2B

    Slope=-p1/p2

    Budget Line

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    38/56

    38

    e

    Person A e1A

    e2A

    e1B Person B

    e2B

    Slope=-p1/p2

    Budget Line

    Person As Budget Set Given Endowment and

    Prices as Depicted by Budget Line

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    39/56

    As Much of Person Bs Budget

    Set as Fits in the Slide

    39

    Person A e1A

    e2A

    e1B Person B

    e2B

    Slope=-p1/p2

    Budget Line

    P i Whi h Th E i

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    40/56

    Prices at Which There Exists

    Excess Demand for Good x

    40

    e

    Person A

    Person B

    Budget Line

    x1A(p;eA)

    x2B(p;eB)

    x1B(p;eB)

    x2A(p;eA)

    x1A(p;eA)+x1B(p;eB)> e1A+e1B

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    41/56

    Because there is excess demand for Good 1 atprices p, the economy is not in a generalcompetitive equilibrium at these prices

    For markets to clear, the price of Good 1 relativeto Good 2 must rise: the budget line must

    become steeper

    41

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    42/56

    Market-Clearing Price

    42

    e

    A

    B

    Budget Line

    x1A(p;eA)

    x2A(p;eA)

    x1B(p;eB)

    x2B(p;eB)

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    43/56

    Two Steps to Finding a General

    Competitive Equilibrium1. Find Consumers uncompensated demands as a

    function of price (exactly as you did last term

    when you take mi=p1e1i+p2e2i)

    2. Find price at which Supply=Demand

    Shortcut: Because only relative and not absoluteprices matter, you may set the price of a single

    good equal to one

    43

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    44/56

    Example

    Two goods cherries cand damsons d Utilities uA(xcA,xdA)= xcAxdA and uB(xcB,xdB) = xcBxdB

    Consider eA =(2,0), eB =(0,2)

    Set the price of damsons = 1 and of cherries = p

    You know from last term that consumers with suchCobb-Douglas preferences with equal exponents

    for both goods spend half of income on each good.(If you dont, finding demand is good exercise.)

    44

    A demands x A(p;eA)=(1/2)(pe A+edA)/p

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    45/56

    A demands xc (p;e)=(1/2)(pec +ed )/p=(1/2)(2p)/p=1 and

    xdA(p;eA)= (1/2)(pecA+edA)/1=(1/2)(2p)/1=p

    B demands xcB(p;eB)=(1/2) (pecB+edB)/p=(1/2)(2)/p=1/p and

    xdB(p;eB) =(1/2) (pecB+edB)/1=(1/2)(2)/1=1

    Excess demand for cherries is zero whenxcA(p;eA)+ xcB(p;eB)-2=1+(1/p)-2=0

    This happens when p=1

    Thus, general competitive prices=(1,1) General competitive allocation: ycA= xcA(1,1;eA)=1,ydA= xdA(1,1;eA)=(1/2)(2)/1=1; ycB= xcB(1,1;eB)=(1/2)(2)/1=1and ydB=xdB(1,1;eB)=(1/2)(2)/1=145

    C t d f t

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    46/56

    46

    eA

    B

    xcA(p;eA)

    xdA(p;eA)

    xcB(p;eB)

    xdB(p;eB)y

    Consumers trade from e to y

    at prices (1,1)

    cherries

    damsons

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    47/56

    Trade and Welfare

    Notice that uA(eA)=uA(2,0)=0; absent trade (inautarky) A gets zero utility. After trade, uA(ycA,ydA)=uA(1,1)=1. Person A strictly benefits from trade. Sotoo does Person B.

    In general, consumers must always be weakly better

    off after trade than in autarky because they always

    have the freedom not to trade. In most cases, like

    here, consumers will be strictly better off with trade

    Economists tend to believe that moving fromautarky to free trade strictly benefits all parties

    47

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    48/56

    Another example

    Let eA =(0,1), eB =(2,0)

    Suppose uA=x1A and uB=min{x1B,x2B}

    Check that (y1A

    ,y2A

    )=(1,0), (y1B

    ,y2B

    ) =(1,1),p=(1,1) is General Competitive Equilibrium

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    49/56

    e

    Slope=-p1/p2=-1

    As indifference curves in red and Bs in blueA

    B

    y

    Cl l A i i tilit ithi

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    50/56

    Clearly A maximises utility within

    budget set by demanding yA

    e

    Slope=-p1/p2=-1

    As indifference curves in red and Bs in blueA

    B

    y

    As budget set

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    51/56

    B maximises utility within

    budget set by demandingy

    e

    Slope=-p1/p2=-1

    A

    B

    y

    Bs budget set

    Ch i E d m t

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    52/56

    Changing Endowments

    Consider a new economy exactly like first one exceptthat As endowment increases: now eA =(0,2)

    First, find demands: since A cares only for Good 1,xA(p;eA)= ((p1e1A+ p2e2A)/p1,0)

    =(p2e2A

    /p1,0)= (2p2/p1,0)

    Since B has Leontief (aka Fixed-Proportions) utility,B choosesx1B= x2B, so

    xB

    (p;eB

    ) =((p1e1B

    +p2e2B

    )/(p1+p2),(p1e1B+p2e2B)/(p1+p2))

    = (2p1/(p1+p2),2p1/(p1+p2))

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    53/56

    For the market for Good 1 to clear,x1A(p;eA)+ x1B(p;eB)e1A+e1B=0+2=2

    So 2p2/p1+ 2p1/(p1+p2)2 Because relative prices are all that matter in general

    equilibrium, we can always set one price equal to

    one

    Take p1=1

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    54/56

    This gives 2p2+ 2/(1+p2)2, or 2p2(1+p2)+ 22(1+p2)

    2p220, which implies that p2=0 Thus p=(1,0). Substituting these prices into

    demand givesxA(p;eA) =(0,0), xB(p;eB) =(2,2). Thusp=(1,0), yA=(0,0), yB=(2,2) is our general competitiveequilibrium.

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    55/56

    e

    lope=-p1/p2=-

    As indifference curves in red and Bs in blueA

    B

    y

  • 7/22/2019 ec201 week 1 2012

    56/56

    Comparing Static Exchange

    Economies In the first economy (where eA =(0,1)), the generalcompetitive equilibrium hasyA =(1,0), and

    uA(yA)=1+0=1.

    In the second economy (where eA =(0,2)), the generalcompetitive equilibrium hasyA =(0,0), anduA(yA)=0+0=0.

    As endowment has increased (with everything elsethe same), yet her utility falls!


Recommended